about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,314 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the second variable is Automotive recalls for issues with Steering.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As hearing aid specialists multiplied, so did their ability to eavesdrop on car conversations. The steering wheels, feeling self-conscious about all the backseat driving, started overcorrecting and swerving, leading to an increase in automotive recalls for steering issues. It was a real case of "hear today, recalled tomorrow!"

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A funny image macro ]: A funny image macro of a confused driver clutching the steering wheel with a comically exaggerated expression of shock and disbelief, while a line of hearing aid specialists' offices stretches down the bustling Massachusetts town street behind them. A line of cars can be seen pulling over, with drivers straining to make sense of strange noises coming from their steering systems. The specialists' offices are comically illustrated with large ear-shaped signs and cartoonishly over-sized hearing aid images, creatively blending the concept of hearing aid specialists with the unintended amplification of car noises, fueling the chaos in the town. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Steering. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a Polaroid photo An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie a funny image macro Realistic a funny image you would see on reddit
ChatGPT: a funny image macro

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Steering, in the following situation: As the number of hearing aid specialists increased in Massachusetts, more drivers were able to hear strange noises coming from their steering systems, leading to an uptick in automotive recalls for steering issues. It turns out, the specialists were inadvertently amplifying the sound of misaligned wheels, causing drivers to panic and demand immediate repairs!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Massachusetts town, a line of hearing aid specialists' offices stretched down the street. On the nearby road, cars could be seen pulling over as drivers strained to make sense of strange noises coming from their steering systems. With each new specialist's opening, the volume of cars making unscheduled stops increased, causing a spike in automotive recalls for steering issues. Little did anyone know, the specialists' skilled work had unintentionally amplified the sound of misaligned wheels, causing panic among drivers and demanding immediate repairs.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image macro ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Massachusetts town, a line of hearing aid specialists' offices stretched down the street. On the nearby road, cars could be seen pulling over as drivers strained to make sense of strange noises coming from their steering systems. With each new specialist's opening, the volume of cars making unscheduled stops increased, causing a spike in automotive recalls for steering issues. Little did anyone know, the specialists' skilled work had unintentionally amplified the sound of misaligned wheels, causing panic among drivers and demanding immediate repairs. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A funny image macro ]: A funny image macro of a confused driver clutching the steering wheel with a comically exaggerated expression of shock and disbelief, while a line of hearing aid specialists' offices stretches down the bustling Massachusetts town street behind them. A line of cars can be seen pulling over, with drivers straining to make sense of strange noises coming from their steering systems. The specialists' offices are comically illustrated with large ear-shaped signs and cartoonishly over-sized hearing aid images, creatively blending the concept of hearing aid specialists with the unintended amplification of car noises, fueling the chaos in the town.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts caused Automotive recalls for issues with Steering to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Hear Me Out: An Ear-resistible Link Between Hearing Aid Specialists and Automotive Recalls for Steering Issues

The Journal of Auditory Investigations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Steering. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9149651 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Hear Me Out: An Ear-resistible Link Between Hearing Aid Specialists and Automotive Recalls for Steering Issues

[[ABSTRACT]]
Steering issues in automobiles are a serious concern for public safety and consumer trust. Our study aimed to investigate the potential correlation between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues over the span of 2012 to 2022. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, our research team uncovered a surprising and unmistakable connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9149651 and p < 0.01 for this time period provided convincing evidence for the relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors.

It's no surprise that steering issues can be quite disorienting, but the unexpected role of hearing aid specialists in this equation may lead one to ask, "Can they hear the steering trouble before it happens?" Our findings like this correlation to two ships passing in the night, though in this case, those ships may have had issues with their steering. The implications of this study extend beyond the realm of automotive safety to the realms of labor statistics and public health. This research adds a new dimension to the interaction between seemingly unrelated industries, reminding us that sometimes, unexpected connections can hold the key to understanding complex societal issues.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the peculiar yet compelling connection between the number of hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues in Massachusetts. This research sparks an important conversation that may inspire further investigations and ultimately contribute to proactive measures in automotive safety and public health.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Steering. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Hear Me Out: An Ear-resistible Link Between Hearing Aid Specialists and Automotive Recalls for Steering Issues

[[ABSTRACT]]
Steering issues in automobiles are a serious concern for public safety and consumer trust. Our study aimed to investigate the potential correlation between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues over the span of 2012 to 2022. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, our research team uncovered a surprising and unmistakable connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9149651 and p < 0.01 for this time period provided convincing evidence for the relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors.

It's no surprise that steering issues can be quite disorienting, but the unexpected role of hearing aid specialists in this equation may lead one to ask, "Can they hear the steering trouble before it happens?" Our findings like this correlation to two ships passing in the night, though in this case, those ships may have had issues with their steering. The implications of this study extend beyond the realm of automotive safety to the realms of labor statistics and public health. This research adds a new dimension to the interaction between seemingly unrelated industries, reminding us that sometimes, unexpected connections can hold the key to understanding complex societal issues.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the peculiar yet compelling connection between the number of hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues in Massachusetts. This research sparks an important conversation that may inspire further investigations and ultimately contribute to proactive measures in automotive safety and public health.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The automotive industry is no stranger to the occasional steer-ing mishap, and the role of hearing aid specialists in this peculiar correlation has been the subject of much ear-scratching and head-turning. As Mark Twain once quipped, "To succeed in life, you need two things: ignorance and confidence. Or a really good hearing aid specialist." In a similar vein, our research aims to unravel the unexpected connection between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues, offering a unique perspective on public health and labor statistics.

It's as if steering issues and hearing aid specialists were destined to meet - a real-life case of "ear Today, gone tomorrow." While the field of automotive safety has traditionally focused on mechanical and technological factors, our study introduces a new dimension by exploring the potential influence of human auditory perception on the occurrence of steering-related recalls. This investigation ignites a spark of curiosity, prompting us to ask, "Are hearing aid specialists the unsung heroes of automotive safety, silently detecting steering troubles before they escalate?"

The conventional wisdom that "You can't have your cake and eat it too" doesn't apply here; our research suggests that understanding the role of hearing aid specialists in the context of automotive safety may not only allow us to have our cake, but also prevent it from veering off course. Our findings, akin to a well-crafted joke, may initially elicit surprise and amusement, but upon closer examination, they provoke thought and encourage a deeper exploration of seemingly unrelated industries.

In a nutshell, the aim of this study is to bring to light the ear-resistible link between hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues in Massachusetts. By peeling back the layers of this unanticipated connection, we hope to steer the conversation in a new direction - one that encourages collaboration between industries, inspires further investigations, and strengthens measures for automotive safety and public health.

Speaking of unexpected connections, what do you call a hearing aid specialist who also moonlights as a mechanic? A specialist in "sound advice" for steering clear of trouble!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Steering. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Hear Me Out: An Ear-resistible Link Between Hearing Aid Specialists and Automotive Recalls for Steering Issues

[[ABSTRACT]]
Steering issues in automobiles are a serious concern for public safety and consumer trust. Our study aimed to investigate the potential correlation between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues over the span of 2012 to 2022. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, our research team uncovered a surprising and unmistakable connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9149651 and p < 0.01 for this time period provided convincing evidence for the relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors.

It's no surprise that steering issues can be quite disorienting, but the unexpected role of hearing aid specialists in this equation may lead one to ask, "Can they hear the steering trouble before it happens?" Our findings like this correlation to two ships passing in the night, though in this case, those ships may have had issues with their steering. The implications of this study extend beyond the realm of automotive safety to the realms of labor statistics and public health. This research adds a new dimension to the interaction between seemingly unrelated industries, reminding us that sometimes, unexpected connections can hold the key to understanding complex societal issues.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the peculiar yet compelling connection between the number of hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues in Massachusetts. This research sparks an important conversation that may inspire further investigations and ultimately contribute to proactive measures in automotive safety and public health.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The automotive industry is no stranger to the occasional steer-ing mishap, and the role of hearing aid specialists in this peculiar correlation has been the subject of much ear-scratching and head-turning. As Mark Twain once quipped, "To succeed in life, you need two things: ignorance and confidence. Or a really good hearing aid specialist." In a similar vein, our research aims to unravel the unexpected connection between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues, offering a unique perspective on public health and labor statistics.
It's as if steering issues and hearing aid specialists were destined to meet - a real-life case of "ear Today, gone tomorrow." While the field of automotive safety has traditionally focused on mechanical and technological factors, our study introduces a new dimension by exploring the potential influence of human auditory perception on the occurrence of steering-related recalls. This investigation ignites a spark of curiosity, prompting us to ask, "Are hearing aid specialists the unsung heroes of automotive safety, silently detecting steering troubles before they escalate?"
The conventional wisdom that "You can't have your cake and eat it too" doesn't apply here; our research suggests that understanding the role of hearing aid specialists in the context of automotive safety may not only allow us to have our cake, but also prevent it from veering off course. Our findings, akin to a well-crafted joke, may initially elicit surprise and amusement, but upon closer examination, they provoke thought and encourage a deeper exploration of seemingly unrelated industries.
In a nutshell, the aim of this study is to bring to light the ear-resistible link between hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues in Massachusetts. By peeling back the layers of this unanticipated connection, we hope to steer the conversation in a new direction - one that encourages collaboration between industries, inspires further investigations, and strengthens measures for automotive safety and public health.
Speaking of unexpected connections, what do you call a hearing aid specialist who also moonlights as a mechanic? A specialist in "sound advice" for steering clear of trouble!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues is a topic of immense interest and intrigue. Smith et al. (2016) found a positive correlation between the two variables, prompting further exploration into the unexpected role of auditory health professionals in the automotive safety landscape.

Diving deeper into the literature, Doe and Jones (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of labor statistics and automotive recall data, revealing a statistically significant association between the proliferation of hearing aid specialists and the occurrence of steering-related recalls. This unforeseen connection, akin to a well-timed punchline, encourages a reevaluation of the factors influencing automotive safety outcomes.

Shifting gears slightly, "The Art of Steering: Navigating the Path to Success" by John Smith (2015) provides a detailed examination of steering mechanisms in automobiles, offering valuable insights into the technical aspects of steering-related issues. On a related note, "Sound Waves and Steering Wheels: Unraveling the Auditory-Mechanical Nexus" by Emily Doe (2017) delves into the intersection of auditory perception and automotive functionality, shedding light on the potential influence of hearing aid specialists in early detection of steering anomalies.

Turning to the realm of fiction, "The Sound of Speed" by David Jones (2019) presents a riveting tale of a hearing aid specialist who uncovers a conspiracy related to faulty steering systems in a fleet of futuristic vehicles. While purely speculative, the narrative prompts consideration of the fictionalized yet captivating interactions between the auditory and automotive domains.

In the pursuit of comprehensive literature review, the authors also explored unconventional sources, including an analysis of CVS receipts to gauge the frequency of purchases involving both hearing aid products and automotive steering wheel covers. While the results were inconclusive, the endeavor left no aisle unturned in the quest for unexpected connections.

In a twist fitting for such an unconventional research endeavor, it seems that the path to understanding the relationship between hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues is paved with both empirical evidence and whimsical exploration. As the saying goes, "When in doubt, steer toward the unexpected - you never know what ear-resistible revelations may await!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Steering. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and US DOT . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Hear Me Out: An Ear-resistible Link Between Hearing Aid Specialists and Automotive Recalls for Steering Issues

[[ABSTRACT]]
Steering issues in automobiles are a serious concern for public safety and consumer trust. Our study aimed to investigate the potential correlation between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues over the span of 2012 to 2022. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, our research team uncovered a surprising and unmistakable connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9149651 and p < 0.01 for this time period provided convincing evidence for the relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors.

It's no surprise that steering issues can be quite disorienting, but the unexpected role of hearing aid specialists in this equation may lead one to ask, "Can they hear the steering trouble before it happens?" Our findings like this correlation to two ships passing in the night, though in this case, those ships may have had issues with their steering. The implications of this study extend beyond the realm of automotive safety to the realms of labor statistics and public health. This research adds a new dimension to the interaction between seemingly unrelated industries, reminding us that sometimes, unexpected connections can hold the key to understanding complex societal issues.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the peculiar yet compelling connection between the number of hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues in Massachusetts. This research sparks an important conversation that may inspire further investigations and ultimately contribute to proactive measures in automotive safety and public health.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The automotive industry is no stranger to the occasional steer-ing mishap, and the role of hearing aid specialists in this peculiar correlation has been the subject of much ear-scratching and head-turning. As Mark Twain once quipped, "To succeed in life, you need two things: ignorance and confidence. Or a really good hearing aid specialist." In a similar vein, our research aims to unravel the unexpected connection between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues, offering a unique perspective on public health and labor statistics.
It's as if steering issues and hearing aid specialists were destined to meet - a real-life case of "ear Today, gone tomorrow." While the field of automotive safety has traditionally focused on mechanical and technological factors, our study introduces a new dimension by exploring the potential influence of human auditory perception on the occurrence of steering-related recalls. This investigation ignites a spark of curiosity, prompting us to ask, "Are hearing aid specialists the unsung heroes of automotive safety, silently detecting steering troubles before they escalate?"
The conventional wisdom that "You can't have your cake and eat it too" doesn't apply here; our research suggests that understanding the role of hearing aid specialists in the context of automotive safety may not only allow us to have our cake, but also prevent it from veering off course. Our findings, akin to a well-crafted joke, may initially elicit surprise and amusement, but upon closer examination, they provoke thought and encourage a deeper exploration of seemingly unrelated industries.
In a nutshell, the aim of this study is to bring to light the ear-resistible link between hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues in Massachusetts. By peeling back the layers of this unanticipated connection, we hope to steer the conversation in a new direction - one that encourages collaboration between industries, inspires further investigations, and strengthens measures for automotive safety and public health.
Speaking of unexpected connections, what do you call a hearing aid specialist who also moonlights as a mechanic? A specialist in "sound advice" for steering clear of trouble!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the ear-resistible link between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and automotive recalls for steering issues, our research employed a multifaceted approach that combined data collection, statistical analyses, and some good old-fashioned sleuthing. Our team combed through the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Department of Transportation databases, sifting through occupational employment and automotive recall data from the period spanning 2012 to 2022.

To begin, we harnessed the power of statistical wizardry to calculate the correlation coefficient between the number of licensed hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls specifically related to steering issues. Our trusty statistical software crunched the numbers, producing a correlation coefficient of 0.9149651, signaling a robust positive relationship between the two variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further bolstered the significance of this connection, leaving us as convinced as a hearing aid specialist would be of a compelling symphony.

Next, we delved into the realm of time series analysis to examine the temporal patterns of both the number of hearing aid specialists and the occurrence of automotive recalls for steering issues. This involved applying sophisticated techniques to detect any rhythmic fluctuations or emerging trends over the decade-long period. The results uncovered intriguing temporal dynamics, akin to the ebb and flow of a sea shanty, shedding light on the evolving relationship between the presence of hearing aid specialists and steering-related automotive recalls.

In a lighthearted attempt to tap into unconventional methods, we even considered the principle of acousto-mechanical resonance, positing that perhaps the vibrations emitted by faulty steering components could clandestinely reach the keen ears of nearby hearing aid specialists, prompting them to take proactive measures in response. While this hypothesis may sound like something out of a whimsical tale, we couldn't resist exploring every avenue, or should we say, "every street and intersection," in our quest for understanding.

Furthermore, we engaged in qualitative interviews with a selection of hearing aid specialists and automotive industry experts, aiming to garner firsthand insights into any anecdotal connections or intuitive perceptions related to steering issues. These conversations not only provided valuable contextual richness but also infused a dash of human perspective into our data-driven investigation.

In a nod to the adage that "you have to listen to both sides of the story," our analysis balanced the voices of the hearing aid specialists with the data from automotive recalls to construct a comprehensive narrative of this intricate correlation. We didn't just want to hear the noise; we wanted to understand its rhythm and melody in the symphony of occupational dynamics and automotive safety.

Speaking of the intersection between sound and safety, did you hear about the hearing aid specialist who moonlighted as a mechanic? He had a knack for providing "sound advice" for steering clear of trouble.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Steering. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and US DOT .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9149651, r-squared of 0.8371611, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Hear Me Out: An Ear-resistible Link Between Hearing Aid Specialists and Automotive Recalls for Steering Issues

[[ABSTRACT]]
Steering issues in automobiles are a serious concern for public safety and consumer trust. Our study aimed to investigate the potential correlation between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues over the span of 2012 to 2022. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, our research team uncovered a surprising and unmistakable connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9149651 and p < 0.01 for this time period provided convincing evidence for the relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors.

It's no surprise that steering issues can be quite disorienting, but the unexpected role of hearing aid specialists in this equation may lead one to ask, "Can they hear the steering trouble before it happens?" Our findings like this correlation to two ships passing in the night, though in this case, those ships may have had issues with their steering. The implications of this study extend beyond the realm of automotive safety to the realms of labor statistics and public health. This research adds a new dimension to the interaction between seemingly unrelated industries, reminding us that sometimes, unexpected connections can hold the key to understanding complex societal issues.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the peculiar yet compelling connection between the number of hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues in Massachusetts. This research sparks an important conversation that may inspire further investigations and ultimately contribute to proactive measures in automotive safety and public health.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The automotive industry is no stranger to the occasional steer-ing mishap, and the role of hearing aid specialists in this peculiar correlation has been the subject of much ear-scratching and head-turning. As Mark Twain once quipped, "To succeed in life, you need two things: ignorance and confidence. Or a really good hearing aid specialist." In a similar vein, our research aims to unravel the unexpected connection between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues, offering a unique perspective on public health and labor statistics.
It's as if steering issues and hearing aid specialists were destined to meet - a real-life case of "ear Today, gone tomorrow." While the field of automotive safety has traditionally focused on mechanical and technological factors, our study introduces a new dimension by exploring the potential influence of human auditory perception on the occurrence of steering-related recalls. This investigation ignites a spark of curiosity, prompting us to ask, "Are hearing aid specialists the unsung heroes of automotive safety, silently detecting steering troubles before they escalate?"
The conventional wisdom that "You can't have your cake and eat it too" doesn't apply here; our research suggests that understanding the role of hearing aid specialists in the context of automotive safety may not only allow us to have our cake, but also prevent it from veering off course. Our findings, akin to a well-crafted joke, may initially elicit surprise and amusement, but upon closer examination, they provoke thought and encourage a deeper exploration of seemingly unrelated industries.
In a nutshell, the aim of this study is to bring to light the ear-resistible link between hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues in Massachusetts. By peeling back the layers of this unanticipated connection, we hope to steer the conversation in a new direction - one that encourages collaboration between industries, inspires further investigations, and strengthens measures for automotive safety and public health.
Speaking of unexpected connections, what do you call a hearing aid specialist who also moonlights as a mechanic? A specialist in "sound advice" for steering clear of trouble!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our study revealed a striking correlation between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues over the years 2012 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9149651 and an r-squared of 0.8371611 demonstrated a strong and statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further supported the robustness of this association.

Figure 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the pronounced correlation between the number of hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues, providing a visual representation of the compelling statistical relationship uncovered in this study.

It's as though hearing aid specialists were the unsung heroes of automotive safety, quietly detecting potential steering troubles before they could take a wrong turn. This correlation presents an intriguing avenue for further exploration, prompting us to ponder whether these specialists possess an "ear" for steering issues that remains unparalleled.

In conclusion, our findings highlight an ear-resistible link between the number of hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues in Massachusetts. This unexpected yet compelling connection opens the door to a new realm of inquiry, emphasizing the value of interdisciplinary perspectives in addressing complex societal issues.

Upon reflecting on our findings, one is reminded of the saying, "What do you call a hearing aid specialist who also moonlights as a mechanic? A specialist in 'sound advice' for steering clear of trouble!" This research not only provides valuable insights into the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate industries but also adds a witty twist to the discourse on automotive safety and public health.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Steering. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Hear Me Out: An Ear-resistible Link Between Hearing Aid Specialists and Automotive Recalls for Steering Issues

[[ABSTRACT]]
Steering issues in automobiles are a serious concern for public safety and consumer trust. Our study aimed to investigate the potential correlation between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues over the span of 2012 to 2022. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, our research team uncovered a surprising and unmistakable connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9149651 and p < 0.01 for this time period provided convincing evidence for the relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors.

It's no surprise that steering issues can be quite disorienting, but the unexpected role of hearing aid specialists in this equation may lead one to ask, "Can they hear the steering trouble before it happens?" Our findings like this correlation to two ships passing in the night, though in this case, those ships may have had issues with their steering. The implications of this study extend beyond the realm of automotive safety to the realms of labor statistics and public health. This research adds a new dimension to the interaction between seemingly unrelated industries, reminding us that sometimes, unexpected connections can hold the key to understanding complex societal issues.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the peculiar yet compelling connection between the number of hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues in Massachusetts. This research sparks an important conversation that may inspire further investigations and ultimately contribute to proactive measures in automotive safety and public health.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues is a topic of immense interest and intrigue. Smith et al. (2016) found a positive correlation between the two variables, prompting further exploration into the unexpected role of auditory health professionals in the automotive safety landscape.
Diving deeper into the literature, Doe and Jones (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of labor statistics and automotive recall data, revealing a statistically significant association between the proliferation of hearing aid specialists and the occurrence of steering-related recalls. This unforeseen connection, akin to a well-timed punchline, encourages a reevaluation of the factors influencing automotive safety outcomes.
Shifting gears slightly, "The Art of Steering: Navigating the Path to Success" by John Smith (2015) provides a detailed examination of steering mechanisms in automobiles, offering valuable insights into the technical aspects of steering-related issues. On a related note, "Sound Waves and Steering Wheels: Unraveling the Auditory-Mechanical Nexus" by Emily Doe (2017) delves into the intersection of auditory perception and automotive functionality, shedding light on the potential influence of hearing aid specialists in early detection of steering anomalies.
Turning to the realm of fiction, "The Sound of Speed" by David Jones (2019) presents a riveting tale of a hearing aid specialist who uncovers a conspiracy related to faulty steering systems in a fleet of futuristic vehicles. While purely speculative, the narrative prompts consideration of the fictionalized yet captivating interactions between the auditory and automotive domains.
In the pursuit of comprehensive literature review, the authors also explored unconventional sources, including an analysis of CVS receipts to gauge the frequency of purchases involving both hearing aid products and automotive steering wheel covers. While the results were inconclusive, the endeavor left no aisle unturned in the quest for unexpected connections.
In a twist fitting for such an unconventional research endeavor, it seems that the path to understanding the relationship between hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues is paved with both empirical evidence and whimsical exploration. As the saying goes, "When in doubt, steer toward the unexpected - you never know what ear-resistible revelations may await!"

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study revealed a striking correlation between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues over the years 2012 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9149651 and an r-squared of 0.8371611 demonstrated a strong and statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further supported the robustness of this association.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the pronounced correlation between the number of hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues, providing a visual representation of the compelling statistical relationship uncovered in this study.
It's as though hearing aid specialists were the unsung heroes of automotive safety, quietly detecting potential steering troubles before they could take a wrong turn. This correlation presents an intriguing avenue for further exploration, prompting us to ponder whether these specialists possess an "ear" for steering issues that remains unparalleled.
In conclusion, our findings highlight an ear-resistible link between the number of hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues in Massachusetts. This unexpected yet compelling connection opens the door to a new realm of inquiry, emphasizing the value of interdisciplinary perspectives in addressing complex societal issues.
Upon reflecting on our findings, one is reminded of the saying, "What do you call a hearing aid specialist who also moonlights as a mechanic? A specialist in 'sound advice' for steering clear of trouble!" This research not only provides valuable insights into the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate industries but also adds a witty twist to the discourse on automotive safety and public health.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study provide compelling evidence for the unexpected yet undeniable connection between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues. The strong correlation coefficient of 0.9149651 and an r-squared of 0.8371611 indicate a robust and statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, supporting the prior research by Smith et al. (2016) and Doe and Jones (2018). This correlation echoes the sentiment that sometimes, the answers we seek are hidden in unexpected places, much like searching for a "car key" in a room full of "cabbage" - an ear-resistible connection waiting to be uncovered.

The presence of a substantial correlation between hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues raises intriguing questions about the potential role of auditory health professionals in detecting early indicators of steering anomalies. One might even humorously wonder if these specialists are equipped with a "steering ear" that allows them to 'hear' trouble in the automotive landscape before it arises - a delightful pun to accompany the profound implications of our findings. This unexpected connection adds a layer of complexity to the interdisciplinary discourse on automotive safety, akin to the twist in a riveting plot that demands further exploration.

The literature review, while filled with quirky anecdotes and unconventional sources, provided valuable context for our study. The seemingly peculiar yet statistically solid connection between the number of hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues reinforces the significance of considering unexpected correlations in multifaceted societal phenomena. It appears that, just like a good dad joke, the relationship between these variables has remained hidden in plain sight, awaiting the keen attention and analysis that our study has brought to light.

It is evident that the unexpected but substantial relationship uncovered in this study not only informs the automotive safety landscape but also underscores the importance of approaching complex issues with a discerning eye for unanticipated connections. As the old adage goes, "What's the best way to listen to steering troubles? With a 'sound' understanding brought by hearing aid specialists!" Our findings encourage future research to delve deeper into the mechanisms underlying this correlation and explore the potential implications for proactive measures in automotive safety and public health.

In summary, our study not only contributes to the budding field of interdisciplinary research but also injects a touch of wit into the discourse, emphasizing the value of embracing unexpected connections in unraveling complex societal issues. This research paves the way for further exploration, reminding us that when it comes to understanding the intricate fabric of society, sometimes, the most ear-resistible revelations are found in the unlikeliest of places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and Automotive recalls for issues with Steering. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Hear Me Out: An Ear-resistible Link Between Hearing Aid Specialists and Automotive Recalls for Steering Issues

[[ABSTRACT]]
Steering issues in automobiles are a serious concern for public safety and consumer trust. Our study aimed to investigate the potential correlation between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues over the span of 2012 to 2022. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, our research team uncovered a surprising and unmistakable connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9149651 and p < 0.01 for this time period provided convincing evidence for the relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors.

It's no surprise that steering issues can be quite disorienting, but the unexpected role of hearing aid specialists in this equation may lead one to ask, "Can they hear the steering trouble before it happens?" Our findings like this correlation to two ships passing in the night, though in this case, those ships may have had issues with their steering. The implications of this study extend beyond the realm of automotive safety to the realms of labor statistics and public health. This research adds a new dimension to the interaction between seemingly unrelated industries, reminding us that sometimes, unexpected connections can hold the key to understanding complex societal issues.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the peculiar yet compelling connection between the number of hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues in Massachusetts. This research sparks an important conversation that may inspire further investigations and ultimately contribute to proactive measures in automotive safety and public health.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The automotive industry is no stranger to the occasional steer-ing mishap, and the role of hearing aid specialists in this peculiar correlation has been the subject of much ear-scratching and head-turning. As Mark Twain once quipped, "To succeed in life, you need two things: ignorance and confidence. Or a really good hearing aid specialist." In a similar vein, our research aims to unravel the unexpected connection between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues, offering a unique perspective on public health and labor statistics.
It's as if steering issues and hearing aid specialists were destined to meet - a real-life case of "ear Today, gone tomorrow." While the field of automotive safety has traditionally focused on mechanical and technological factors, our study introduces a new dimension by exploring the potential influence of human auditory perception on the occurrence of steering-related recalls. This investigation ignites a spark of curiosity, prompting us to ask, "Are hearing aid specialists the unsung heroes of automotive safety, silently detecting steering troubles before they escalate?"
The conventional wisdom that "You can't have your cake and eat it too" doesn't apply here; our research suggests that understanding the role of hearing aid specialists in the context of automotive safety may not only allow us to have our cake, but also prevent it from veering off course. Our findings, akin to a well-crafted joke, may initially elicit surprise and amusement, but upon closer examination, they provoke thought and encourage a deeper exploration of seemingly unrelated industries.
In a nutshell, the aim of this study is to bring to light the ear-resistible link between hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues in Massachusetts. By peeling back the layers of this unanticipated connection, we hope to steer the conversation in a new direction - one that encourages collaboration between industries, inspires further investigations, and strengthens measures for automotive safety and public health.
Speaking of unexpected connections, what do you call a hearing aid specialist who also moonlights as a mechanic? A specialist in "sound advice" for steering clear of trouble!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study revealed a striking correlation between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues over the years 2012 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9149651 and an r-squared of 0.8371611 demonstrated a strong and statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further supported the robustness of this association.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the pronounced correlation between the number of hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues, providing a visual representation of the compelling statistical relationship uncovered in this study.
It's as though hearing aid specialists were the unsung heroes of automotive safety, quietly detecting potential steering troubles before they could take a wrong turn. This correlation presents an intriguing avenue for further exploration, prompting us to ponder whether these specialists possess an "ear" for steering issues that remains unparalleled.
In conclusion, our findings highlight an ear-resistible link between the number of hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues in Massachusetts. This unexpected yet compelling connection opens the door to a new realm of inquiry, emphasizing the value of interdisciplinary perspectives in addressing complex societal issues.
Upon reflecting on our findings, one is reminded of the saying, "What do you call a hearing aid specialist who also moonlights as a mechanic? A specialist in 'sound advice' for steering clear of trouble!" This research not only provides valuable insights into the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate industries but also adds a witty twist to the discourse on automotive safety and public health.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has illuminated a remarkable correlation between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues over the period of 2012 to 2022. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9149651 and the statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 underscore the substantial relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This unexpected connection may lead us to wonder if hearing aid specialists have an "ear" for detecting steering troubles before they cause a "commotion."

Our study not only contributes to the understanding of automotive safety but also offers a fresh perspective on the role of human perception in anticipating mechanical issues. This ear-iginal research may inspire new dialogues between the automotive and healthcare industries, creating opportunities for synergistic approaches to addressing public safety concerns.

As we wrap up, it's important to note that further investigations in this area are as unnecessary as a car with a steering issue—quite unnecessary! This research seizes the wheel of understanding in this unusual correlation, paving the way for a smooth ride toward proactive measures in automotive safety and public health.

As for the joke, what do you call a hearing aid specialist who also moonlights as a mechanic? A specialist in "sound advice" for steering clear of trouble!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Hear Me Out: An Ear-resistible Link Between Hearing Aid Specialists and Automotive Recalls for Steering Issues. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Auditory Investigations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Hear Me Out: An Ear-resistible Link Between Hearing Aid Specialists and Automotive Recalls for Steering Issues. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Auditory Automotive Research and Safety (SAARS)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Hear Me Out: An Ear-resistible Link Between Hearing Aid Specialists and Automotive Recalls for Steering Issues with an abstract of Steering issues in automobiles are a serious concern for public safety and consumer trust. Our study aimed to investigate the potential correlation between the number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts and the frequency of automotive recalls for steering issues over the span of 2012 to 2022. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, our research team uncovered a surprising and unmistakable connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9149651 and p < 0.01 for this time period provided convincing evidence for the relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors.
It's no surprise that steering issues can be quite disorienting, but the unexpected role of hearing aid specialists in this equation may lead one to ask, "Can they hear the steering trouble before it happens?" Our findings like this correlation to two ships passing in the night, though in this case, those ships may have had issues with their steering. The implications of this study extend beyond the realm of automotive safety to the realms of labor statistics and public health. This research adds a new dimension to the interaction between seemingly unrelated industries, reminding us that sometimes, unexpected connections can hold the key to understanding complex societal issues.
In conclusion, our study sheds light on the peculiar yet compelling connection between the number of hearing aid specialists and automotive recalls for steering issues in Massachusetts. This research sparks an important conversation that may inspire further investigations and ultimately contribute to proactive measures in automotive safety and public health.

ChatGPT:

automotive recalls, steering issues, hearing aid specialists, Massachusetts, correlation, Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Transportation, public safety, consumer trust, labor statistics, public health, societal issues, unexpected connections, proactive measures

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts

Automotive recalls for issues with Steering
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls for issues with Steering

Correlation r = 0.9149651 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8371611 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls for issues with Steering) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.9E-5. 0.0000788620906464011300000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.0079% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 12,680 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.7, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts (Hearing Aid Specialists)506070130200220160190110450310
Automotive recalls for issues with Steering (Recalls)2223384651514046317378




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([50,60,70,130,200,220,160,190,110,450,310,])
array_2 = np.array([22,23,38,46,51,51,40,46,31,73,78,])
array_1_name = "The number of hearing aid specialists in Massachusetts"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls for issues with Steering"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 3314 · Black Variable ID: 19177 · Red Variable ID: 1096
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0