about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,293 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the second variable is Jet fuel used in Estonia.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more umpires and referees were needed in Louisiana, there was a surge in whistle production. This, in turn, led to an unexpected spike in demand for jet fuel in Estonia, as it was discovered that a secret ingredient in the environmentally friendly whistle fuel was actually refined Estonian jet fuel. So remember, the next time you hear a whistle, a little part of Estonia is flying high!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A scene from Skyrim ] A group of baseball players stand on the sidelines of a deserted and overgrown baseball field in Louisiana, eagerly awaiting a game that never happens. In the background, the empty soccer pitch adds to the sense of quiet abandonment. Meanwhile, a line of powerful jets sits on the tarmac in Estonia, their engines roaring as they wait to take off, symbolizing the chaos in the air caused by the shortage of referees in Louisiana. The scene is dynamic and filled with anticipation, depicting the impact of the scarcity of officials on sports events in an evocative and visually striking way. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and Jet fuel used in Estonia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cubism A scene from Skyrim Macabre a Polaroid photo Cute cartoon
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and Jet fuel used in Estonia, in the following situation: Jet fuel used in Estonia increased due to a shortage of umpires and referees in Louisiana, causing chaos in local sporting events. This led to delays in games, prompting international teams to use more fuel making multiple trips to finish their matches.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Louisiana, a baseball field sits empty, with players waiting impatiently on the sidelines. The local soccer pitch is also quiet, with no referees in sight. Meanwhile, in Estonia, a line of jets wait on the tarmac, engines roaring as they burn through jet fuel. Teams from different countries are making repeated trips, causing chaos in the air and delays in their matches due to the shortage of umpires and referees in Louisiana.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In Louisiana, a baseball field sits empty, with players waiting impatiently on the sidelines. The local soccer pitch is also quiet, with no referees in sight. Meanwhile, in Estonia, a line of jets wait on the tarmac, engines roaring as they burn through jet fuel. Teams from different countries are making repeated trips, causing chaos in the air and delays in their matches due to the shortage of umpires and referees in Louisiana. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A scene from Skyrim ] A group of baseball players stand on the sidelines of a deserted and overgrown baseball field in Louisiana, eagerly awaiting a game that never happens. In the background, the empty soccer pitch adds to the sense of quiet abandonment. Meanwhile, a line of powerful jets sits on the tarmac in Estonia, their engines roaring as they wait to take off, symbolizing the chaos in the air caused by the shortage of referees in Louisiana. The scene is dynamic and filled with anticipation, depicting the impact of the scarcity of officials on sports events in an evocative and visually striking way.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of umpires and referees in Louisiana caused Jet fuel used in Estonia to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Refereeing Reality: Unraveling the Peculiar Correlation Between Umpire Numbers in Louisiana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Estonia

The International Journal of Unlikely Connections

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and Jet fuel used in Estonia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6841762 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Refereeing Reality: Unraveling the Peculiar Correlation Between Umpire Numbers in Louisiana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Estonia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the unexpected and often overlooked connection between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia. Drawing from data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration for the period spanning 2005 to 2020, our research has unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6841762 and a p-value of less than 0.01. It appears that the link between these two seemingly unrelated factors is indeed statistically significant, leaving us with the burning question – are the umpires in Louisiana unintentionally fueling the skies over Estonia with their calls? As a wise umpire once said, "When in doubt, just wing it!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and Jet fuel used in Estonia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Refereeing Reality: Unraveling the Peculiar Correlation Between Umpire Numbers in Louisiana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Estonia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the unexpected and often overlooked connection between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia. Drawing from data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration for the period spanning 2005 to 2020, our research has unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6841762 and a p-value of less than 0.01. It appears that the link between these two seemingly unrelated factors is indeed statistically significant, leaving us with the burning question – are the umpires in Louisiana unintentionally fueling the skies over Estonia with their calls? As a wise umpire once said, "When in doubt, just wing it!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of statistical analysis often uncovers curious connections that leave even the most seasoned researchers scratching their heads. In this paper, we aim to shed light on a correlation that may seem as improbable as a baseball bat made of jet fuel – the relationship between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia. It's a pairing so unexpected, one might call it a "jet set umpire" – a phrase undoubtedly never uttered until this very moment.

While these two variables may appear to have as much in common as a tennis racket and a shot of espresso, our analysis reveals a surprising link that demands further exploration. Could it be that the calls and whistles of the referees are, in fact, fuelling the engines of the aviation industry, quite literally? One can't help but wonder, are the Louisiana umpires secretly moonlighting as jet fuel distributors? After all, they do have a knack for handling fuel – but of the metaphorical kind!

The regulatory and economic landscape of Louisiana and Estonia may seem worlds apart, much like the disparity between a baseball field and an airport tarmac. However, our research indicates that there may be a deeper connection at play here, one that extends beyond mere coincidence and statistical aberration. As the saying goes, "When the numbers don't add up, it's time to call in the umpire" – or perhaps, it's time to investigate just how their influence reaches across continents and industries.

In the sections that follow, we will delve into the methodology used to tease out this unexpected correlation, discuss the implications of our findings, and ponder the implications for both the realms of sports officiation and international trade. So buckle up, and get ready for a journey that promises to be as perplexing as a referee trying to understand the offside rule in a game of jet-powered football.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and Jet fuel used in Estonia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Refereeing Reality: Unraveling the Peculiar Correlation Between Umpire Numbers in Louisiana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Estonia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the unexpected and often overlooked connection between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia. Drawing from data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration for the period spanning 2005 to 2020, our research has unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6841762 and a p-value of less than 0.01. It appears that the link between these two seemingly unrelated factors is indeed statistically significant, leaving us with the burning question – are the umpires in Louisiana unintentionally fueling the skies over Estonia with their calls? As a wise umpire once said, "When in doubt, just wing it!"

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of statistical analysis often uncovers curious connections that leave even the most seasoned researchers scratching their heads. In this paper, we aim to shed light on a correlation that may seem as improbable as a baseball bat made of jet fuel – the relationship between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia. It's a pairing so unexpected, one might call it a "jet set umpire" – a phrase undoubtedly never uttered until this very moment.
While these two variables may appear to have as much in common as a tennis racket and a shot of espresso, our analysis reveals a surprising link that demands further exploration. Could it be that the calls and whistles of the referees are, in fact, fuelling the engines of the aviation industry, quite literally? One can't help but wonder, are the Louisiana umpires secretly moonlighting as jet fuel distributors? After all, they do have a knack for handling fuel – but of the metaphorical kind!
The regulatory and economic landscape of Louisiana and Estonia may seem worlds apart, much like the disparity between a baseball field and an airport tarmac. However, our research indicates that there may be a deeper connection at play here, one that extends beyond mere coincidence and statistical aberration. As the saying goes, "When the numbers don't add up, it's time to call in the umpire" – or perhaps, it's time to investigate just how their influence reaches across continents and industries.
In the sections that follow, we will delve into the methodology used to tease out this unexpected correlation, discuss the implications of our findings, and ponder the implications for both the realms of sports officiation and international trade. So buckle up, and get ready for a journey that promises to be as perplexing as a referee trying to understand the offside rule in a game of jet-powered football.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Umpire Paradox: An Examination of Officiating Numbers in Louisiana," Smith et al. delve into the intricate world of sports officiation and its implications on societal dynamics. Their study uncovers the surprising influence of the number of umpires on various economic indicators, including the consumption of jet fuel in distant lands. It appears that the umpires' calls and decisions transcend the boundaries of the sports arena, leaving a trail of jet fuel emissions in their wake. As one might say, these umpires are truly hitting it out of the park – and into the skies!

Doe and Jones, in their seminal work "Refereeing Realities: Insights into Officiating Trends," take a deep dive into the behavioral patterns of referees and their impact on global energy consumption. Their findings suggest a subtle yet undeniable connection between the decisions made on the field and the fuel burned thousands of miles away. It seems that the referees' signals reach far beyond the players and spectators, extending into the stratosphere and beyond. It's enough to make one wonder if the referees are secretly fueling not only the game but also the engines of international commerce. Talk about a power play!

Turning our attention to more tangentially related works, we draw inspiration from "The Energy Dilemma: A Global Perspective" by Author X and "Jet Setting: Exploring the World of Aviation" by Author Y. While not directly addressing the peculiar correlation at the heart of our study, these texts offer valuable insights into the industries affected by the unwitting influence of sports officiation. After all, who wouldn't want to read about the silent impact of referees on transcontinental fuel consumption?

In a departure from traditional research sources, we find ourselves drawn to the realm of fiction for potential insights. Consider "The Jet-Fueled Umpire Chronicles" by novelist Z and "Referees of the Skies" by author W. While these may not be academic treatises, their imaginative exploration of the intersection between sports officiation and jet propulsion offers a refreshing perspective. Who knows, perhaps these fictional works hold the key to unlocking the enigma of umpires and jet fuel consumption. After all, truth can be stranger than fiction, but not necessarily funnier!

As we navigate the intricate web of scholarly literature and imaginative storytelling, we are reminded of the timeless wisdom encapsulated in the words of a legendary umpire: "I never argue with people who raise strange questions. After all, they may have some fascinating answers!" With that in mind, we forge ahead into the uncharted territory of umpires, jet fuel, and everything in between. And who knows, perhaps we'll find that the true fuel of officiation is not just adrenaline, but also the propellant that powers the skies above.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and Jet fuel used in Estonia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2005 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Refereeing Reality: Unraveling the Peculiar Correlation Between Umpire Numbers in Louisiana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Estonia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the unexpected and often overlooked connection between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia. Drawing from data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration for the period spanning 2005 to 2020, our research has unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6841762 and a p-value of less than 0.01. It appears that the link between these two seemingly unrelated factors is indeed statistically significant, leaving us with the burning question – are the umpires in Louisiana unintentionally fueling the skies over Estonia with their calls? As a wise umpire once said, "When in doubt, just wing it!"

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of statistical analysis often uncovers curious connections that leave even the most seasoned researchers scratching their heads. In this paper, we aim to shed light on a correlation that may seem as improbable as a baseball bat made of jet fuel – the relationship between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia. It's a pairing so unexpected, one might call it a "jet set umpire" – a phrase undoubtedly never uttered until this very moment.
While these two variables may appear to have as much in common as a tennis racket and a shot of espresso, our analysis reveals a surprising link that demands further exploration. Could it be that the calls and whistles of the referees are, in fact, fuelling the engines of the aviation industry, quite literally? One can't help but wonder, are the Louisiana umpires secretly moonlighting as jet fuel distributors? After all, they do have a knack for handling fuel – but of the metaphorical kind!
The regulatory and economic landscape of Louisiana and Estonia may seem worlds apart, much like the disparity between a baseball field and an airport tarmac. However, our research indicates that there may be a deeper connection at play here, one that extends beyond mere coincidence and statistical aberration. As the saying goes, "When the numbers don't add up, it's time to call in the umpire" – or perhaps, it's time to investigate just how their influence reaches across continents and industries.
In the sections that follow, we will delve into the methodology used to tease out this unexpected correlation, discuss the implications of our findings, and ponder the implications for both the realms of sports officiation and international trade. So buckle up, and get ready for a journey that promises to be as perplexing as a referee trying to understand the offside rule in a game of jet-powered football.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the enigmatic web of correlation between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia, our research employed a meticulously crafted combination of quantitative analysis and deductive reasoning that would make Sherlock Holmes proud. We gathered data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, utilizing their archives from the years 2005 to 2020. As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but notice how it all seemed to "umpire" to the same conclusion.

Our initial step involved determining the precise number of umpires and referees active in the state of Louisiana across various sports. We covered all sorts – from baseball and softball to basketball and football, leaving no whistle unturned. Then, in a spirited game of data collection, we garnered statistics on the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia, taking into account the different usage scenarios – commercial flights, military operations, and even the whimsical notion of jet-fueled sightseeing tours.

With the raw data in hand, akin to a baseball infielder holding a bag of peanuts, we set about the laborious task of data cleaning and preparation. This process involved removing any outliers that attempted to disrupt the harmony of our statistical symphony – like a mischievous outfielder trying to steal a home run. Once we had polished the data to a gleaming shine, we subjected it to the merciless scrutiny of statistical analysis.

Leveraging the venerable tools of regression analysis and correlation testing, we sought to discern the degree of relationship between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the jet fuel consumption in Estonia. The results left us as stunned as an outfielder catching a fly ball with their cap because the correlation coefficient of 0.6841762 and a p-value of less than 0.01 indicated a remarkably robust association. It was a curveball we never saw coming!

In addition, we recognize that the nature of our study may prompt eyebrow-raising and incredulous looks in equal measure. However, we must emphasize that our research is woven with the thread of utmost sincerity and scientific rigor, much like a carefully crafted baseball to withstand the frenetic pace of a game.

As we tread further into the heart of our findings, we must acknowledge the limitations of our study. The breadth and depth of the data were constrained by the available records, akin to a baseball game that's called off due to bad weather. Additionally, the nature of our research design limits our ability to draw causal conclusions. We endeavor to proceed with cautious optimism, much like a pitcher glancing towards the home plate, hoping for a perfect strike.

In the subsequent sections, we will unravel the implications of our findings and delve into the realms of speculation and potential avenues for further investigation. As Yogi Berra, the legendary baseball figure, once said, "It ain't over till it's over." Similarly, our quest to comprehend this intriguing correlation is far from concluded. So, grab your metaphorical peanuts and crackerjacks, and brace yourself for the intriguing voyage that lies ahead.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and Jet fuel used in Estonia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2005 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.6841762, r-squared of 0.4680970, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Refereeing Reality: Unraveling the Peculiar Correlation Between Umpire Numbers in Louisiana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Estonia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the unexpected and often overlooked connection between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia. Drawing from data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration for the period spanning 2005 to 2020, our research has unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6841762 and a p-value of less than 0.01. It appears that the link between these two seemingly unrelated factors is indeed statistically significant, leaving us with the burning question – are the umpires in Louisiana unintentionally fueling the skies over Estonia with their calls? As a wise umpire once said, "When in doubt, just wing it!"

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of statistical analysis often uncovers curious connections that leave even the most seasoned researchers scratching their heads. In this paper, we aim to shed light on a correlation that may seem as improbable as a baseball bat made of jet fuel – the relationship between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia. It's a pairing so unexpected, one might call it a "jet set umpire" – a phrase undoubtedly never uttered until this very moment.
While these two variables may appear to have as much in common as a tennis racket and a shot of espresso, our analysis reveals a surprising link that demands further exploration. Could it be that the calls and whistles of the referees are, in fact, fuelling the engines of the aviation industry, quite literally? One can't help but wonder, are the Louisiana umpires secretly moonlighting as jet fuel distributors? After all, they do have a knack for handling fuel – but of the metaphorical kind!
The regulatory and economic landscape of Louisiana and Estonia may seem worlds apart, much like the disparity between a baseball field and an airport tarmac. However, our research indicates that there may be a deeper connection at play here, one that extends beyond mere coincidence and statistical aberration. As the saying goes, "When the numbers don't add up, it's time to call in the umpire" – or perhaps, it's time to investigate just how their influence reaches across continents and industries.
In the sections that follow, we will delve into the methodology used to tease out this unexpected correlation, discuss the implications of our findings, and ponder the implications for both the realms of sports officiation and international trade. So buckle up, and get ready for a journey that promises to be as perplexing as a referee trying to understand the offside rule in a game of jet-powered football.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The unraveling of the peculiar correlation between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia has left our research team both astounded and amused. We found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.6841762 and an r-squared value of 0.4680970, with a p-value of less than 0.01. It appears that this unexpected association is not a mere fluke but warrants further investigation. It's almost as if the Louisiana umpires have been giving the phrase "fueling the game" a whole new meaning!

Figure 1 presents a scatterplot demonstrating the robust relationship between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia over the period 2005 to 2020. The visualization starkly illustrates the surprisingly intertwined nature of these variables, leaving us with more questions than answers. As we contemplate this unexpected link, one cannot help but ponder whether the Louisiana umpires possess a hidden talent for jet fuel management – a real "home run" in the aviation industry, if you will.

The statistical significance of this correlation paves the way for a myriad of potential explanations, each more peculiar than the last. Could it be that the calls made on the baseball field in Louisiana have a direct impact on the consumption of jet fuel thousands of miles away in Estonia? The absurdity of the notion is matched only by the strength of the statistical evidence. As the saying goes, "It's a statistical home run, but for jet fuel instead of baseballs!"

The implications of these findings go beyond mere statistical amusement. The interplay between seemingly unrelated variables reminds us of the intricate and often mysterious connections that underpin various aspects of our world. While we may be left scratching our heads over the unconventional association between umpires and jet fuel, it serves as a compelling reminder that in the world of research, the most unexpected findings often lead to the most intriguing inquiries. After all, as any good umpire knows, sometimes you just have to "play ball" with the data and see where it takes you!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and Jet fuel used in Estonia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Refereeing Reality: Unraveling the Peculiar Correlation Between Umpire Numbers in Louisiana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Estonia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the unexpected and often overlooked connection between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia. Drawing from data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration for the period spanning 2005 to 2020, our research has unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6841762 and a p-value of less than 0.01. It appears that the link between these two seemingly unrelated factors is indeed statistically significant, leaving us with the burning question – are the umpires in Louisiana unintentionally fueling the skies over Estonia with their calls? As a wise umpire once said, "When in doubt, just wing it!"

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Umpire Paradox: An Examination of Officiating Numbers in Louisiana," Smith et al. delve into the intricate world of sports officiation and its implications on societal dynamics. Their study uncovers the surprising influence of the number of umpires on various economic indicators, including the consumption of jet fuel in distant lands. It appears that the umpires' calls and decisions transcend the boundaries of the sports arena, leaving a trail of jet fuel emissions in their wake. As one might say, these umpires are truly hitting it out of the park – and into the skies!
Doe and Jones, in their seminal work "Refereeing Realities: Insights into Officiating Trends," take a deep dive into the behavioral patterns of referees and their impact on global energy consumption. Their findings suggest a subtle yet undeniable connection between the decisions made on the field and the fuel burned thousands of miles away. It seems that the referees' signals reach far beyond the players and spectators, extending into the stratosphere and beyond. It's enough to make one wonder if the referees are secretly fueling not only the game but also the engines of international commerce. Talk about a power play!
Turning our attention to more tangentially related works, we draw inspiration from "The Energy Dilemma: A Global Perspective" by Author X and "Jet Setting: Exploring the World of Aviation" by Author Y. While not directly addressing the peculiar correlation at the heart of our study, these texts offer valuable insights into the industries affected by the unwitting influence of sports officiation. After all, who wouldn't want to read about the silent impact of referees on transcontinental fuel consumption?
In a departure from traditional research sources, we find ourselves drawn to the realm of fiction for potential insights. Consider "The Jet-Fueled Umpire Chronicles" by novelist Z and "Referees of the Skies" by author W. While these may not be academic treatises, their imaginative exploration of the intersection between sports officiation and jet propulsion offers a refreshing perspective. Who knows, perhaps these fictional works hold the key to unlocking the enigma of umpires and jet fuel consumption. After all, truth can be stranger than fiction, but not necessarily funnier!
As we navigate the intricate web of scholarly literature and imaginative storytelling, we are reminded of the timeless wisdom encapsulated in the words of a legendary umpire: "I never argue with people who raise strange questions. After all, they may have some fascinating answers!" With that in mind, we forge ahead into the uncharted territory of umpires, jet fuel, and everything in between. And who knows, perhaps we'll find that the true fuel of officiation is not just adrenaline, but also the propellant that powers the skies above.

[[RESULTS]]
The unraveling of the peculiar correlation between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia has left our research team both astounded and amused. We found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.6841762 and an r-squared value of 0.4680970, with a p-value of less than 0.01. It appears that this unexpected association is not a mere fluke but warrants further investigation. It's almost as if the Louisiana umpires have been giving the phrase "fueling the game" a whole new meaning!
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot demonstrating the robust relationship between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia over the period 2005 to 2020. The visualization starkly illustrates the surprisingly intertwined nature of these variables, leaving us with more questions than answers. As we contemplate this unexpected link, one cannot help but ponder whether the Louisiana umpires possess a hidden talent for jet fuel management – a real "home run" in the aviation industry, if you will.
The statistical significance of this correlation paves the way for a myriad of potential explanations, each more peculiar than the last. Could it be that the calls made on the baseball field in Louisiana have a direct impact on the consumption of jet fuel thousands of miles away in Estonia? The absurdity of the notion is matched only by the strength of the statistical evidence. As the saying goes, "It's a statistical home run, but for jet fuel instead of baseballs!"
The implications of these findings go beyond mere statistical amusement. The interplay between seemingly unrelated variables reminds us of the intricate and often mysterious connections that underpin various aspects of our world. While we may be left scratching our heads over the unconventional association between umpires and jet fuel, it serves as a compelling reminder that in the world of research, the most unexpected findings often lead to the most intriguing inquiries. After all, as any good umpire knows, sometimes you just have to "play ball" with the data and see where it takes you!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have shed light on the hitherto unexplored and seemingly whimsical relationship between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia. These findings corroborate the prior research that hinted at the intriguing influence of sports officiation on distant economic indicators. Smith et al.'s work, in particular, suggested the far-reaching impact of umpires' decisions, and our study now provides statistical evidence to support this unconventional assertion. It appears that the umpires are not just calling the shots on the field but are inadvertently making their mark on the global fuel consumption charts. As one might say, it seems the power of their calls extends beyond the outfield and into the stratosphere – talk about a grand slam of statistical significance!
Furthermore, Doe and Jones' insightful exploration of the referees' behavioral patterns and their influence on international energy use seems to find support in our own investigation. The statistical significance of the correlation coefficient and the robustness of the relationship depicted in our scatterplot reiterate the subtler connection between the decisions made on the field and the fuel burned in far-flung lands. It is as if the referees are not merely arbiters of the game but are, in fact, unintentional influencers of transcontinental fuel consumption. It's almost as if the referees are signaling not just for the players but for the skies above as well – a true power play indeed!
Even as we embrace the statistical evidence and its implications, the whimsical nature of the association between umpires and jet fuel consumption serves as a poignant reminder of the unexpected connections that underpin our world. The unorthodox interplay between these variables challenges conventional wisdom with a refreshing dose of humor and provides a compelling case for further investigation. After all, who would have thought that the calls made on the fields of Louisiana could fuel the skies over Estonia? As any good umpire would say, "You can't predict a curveball, but you can always account for some statistical swing!"
Through our study, we not only add to the intriguing body of research on the unusual impacts of sports officiation but also reaffirm the fundamental truth that the most unexpected findings often lead to the most intriguing inquiries. It is a statistical home run, not just for jet fuel but also for fostering a deeper appreciation of the complex and whimsical nature of the world around us. As we close this discussion, it seems only fitting to say, "It's not just a game; it's a statistical wonderland of insights waiting to be uncovered!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and Jet fuel used in Estonia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Refereeing Reality: Unraveling the Peculiar Correlation Between Umpire Numbers in Louisiana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Estonia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the unexpected and often overlooked connection between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia. Drawing from data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration for the period spanning 2005 to 2020, our research has unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6841762 and a p-value of less than 0.01. It appears that the link between these two seemingly unrelated factors is indeed statistically significant, leaving us with the burning question – are the umpires in Louisiana unintentionally fueling the skies over Estonia with their calls? As a wise umpire once said, "When in doubt, just wing it!"

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of statistical analysis often uncovers curious connections that leave even the most seasoned researchers scratching their heads. In this paper, we aim to shed light on a correlation that may seem as improbable as a baseball bat made of jet fuel – the relationship between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia. It's a pairing so unexpected, one might call it a "jet set umpire" – a phrase undoubtedly never uttered until this very moment.
While these two variables may appear to have as much in common as a tennis racket and a shot of espresso, our analysis reveals a surprising link that demands further exploration. Could it be that the calls and whistles of the referees are, in fact, fuelling the engines of the aviation industry, quite literally? One can't help but wonder, are the Louisiana umpires secretly moonlighting as jet fuel distributors? After all, they do have a knack for handling fuel – but of the metaphorical kind!
The regulatory and economic landscape of Louisiana and Estonia may seem worlds apart, much like the disparity between a baseball field and an airport tarmac. However, our research indicates that there may be a deeper connection at play here, one that extends beyond mere coincidence and statistical aberration. As the saying goes, "When the numbers don't add up, it's time to call in the umpire" – or perhaps, it's time to investigate just how their influence reaches across continents and industries.
In the sections that follow, we will delve into the methodology used to tease out this unexpected correlation, discuss the implications of our findings, and ponder the implications for both the realms of sports officiation and international trade. So buckle up, and get ready for a journey that promises to be as perplexing as a referee trying to understand the offside rule in a game of jet-powered football.

[[RESULTS]]
The unraveling of the peculiar correlation between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia has left our research team both astounded and amused. We found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.6841762 and an r-squared value of 0.4680970, with a p-value of less than 0.01. It appears that this unexpected association is not a mere fluke but warrants further investigation. It's almost as if the Louisiana umpires have been giving the phrase "fueling the game" a whole new meaning!
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot demonstrating the robust relationship between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia over the period 2005 to 2020. The visualization starkly illustrates the surprisingly intertwined nature of these variables, leaving us with more questions than answers. As we contemplate this unexpected link, one cannot help but ponder whether the Louisiana umpires possess a hidden talent for jet fuel management – a real "home run" in the aviation industry, if you will.
The statistical significance of this correlation paves the way for a myriad of potential explanations, each more peculiar than the last. Could it be that the calls made on the baseball field in Louisiana have a direct impact on the consumption of jet fuel thousands of miles away in Estonia? The absurdity of the notion is matched only by the strength of the statistical evidence. As the saying goes, "It's a statistical home run, but for jet fuel instead of baseballs!"
The implications of these findings go beyond mere statistical amusement. The interplay between seemingly unrelated variables reminds us of the intricate and often mysterious connections that underpin various aspects of our world. While we may be left scratching our heads over the unconventional association between umpires and jet fuel, it serves as a compelling reminder that in the world of research, the most unexpected findings often lead to the most intriguing inquiries. After all, as any good umpire knows, sometimes you just have to "play ball" with the data and see where it takes you!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unearthed a statistically significant correlation between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia, with a correlation coefficient of 0.6841762 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected link has left us pondering the intercontinental influence of umpires, who may have inadvertently become the unsung heroes of the aviation industry. It seems they've truly taken the term "umpire's call" to new heights, quite literally.

As we grapple with the implications of this peculiar connection, it becomes clear that the world of statistical analysis has once again proven to be as unpredictable as a knuckleball in a baseball game. Just when you think you've got the game figured out, a curveball comes along – or in this case, an unexpected correlate between sports officiation and jet fuel consumption. It's truly a testament to the whimsical nature of statistical analysis, where even the most incongruous pairings can hold surprising significance. You might say it's like trying to predict the outcome of a game based on the price of tea in China – a real statistical head-scratcher, if you will.

In light of these findings, we are left with but one conclusion: this unique correlation is indeed deserving of further exploration, as it opens up a trove of fascinating questions about the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables. Nevertheless, in the immortal words of a seasoned umpire, "That's the end of the inning, folks!" It seems that the mystery of the umpires and jet fuel has been unveiled, and no further research is needed in this delightfully curious area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Refereeing Reality: Unraveling the Peculiar Correlation Between Umpire Numbers in Louisiana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Estonia. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Unlikely Connections


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Refereeing Reality: Unraveling the Peculiar Correlation Between Umpire Numbers in Louisiana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Estonia. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Transdimensional Research and Meta-Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Refereeing Reality: Unraveling the Peculiar Correlation Between Umpire Numbers in Louisiana and Jet Fuel Consumption in Estonia with an abstract of In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the unexpected and often overlooked connection between the number of umpires and referees in Louisiana and the consumption of jet fuel in Estonia. Drawing from data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration for the period spanning 2005 to 2020, our research has unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6841762 and a p-value of less than 0.01. It appears that the link between these two seemingly unrelated factors is indeed statistically significant, leaving us with the burning question – are the umpires in Louisiana unintentionally fueling the skies over Estonia with their calls? As a wise umpire once said, "When in doubt, just wing it!

ChatGPT:

umpires, referees, Louisiana, jet fuel consumption, Estonia, correlation, data analysis, unexpected connection, statistical significance, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, p-value

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of umpires and referees in Louisiana
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of umpires, referees, and other sports officials in Louisiana
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of umpires and referees in Louisiana

Jet fuel used in Estonia
Detailed data title: Volume of jet fuel used consumed in Estonia in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Jet fuel used in Estonia

Correlation r = 0.6841762 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4680970 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 46.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Jet fuel used in Estonia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of umpires and referees in Louisiana) over the 16 years from 2005 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0035. 0.0034651688084560130000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.68 in 0.35% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 289 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.29, 0.88 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
The number of umpires and referees in Louisiana (Laborers)60330440370220200260280210230370270420440340210
Jet fuel used in Estonia (Million Barrels/Day)0.997261.057531.279451.456280.80.7260270.9753421.267761.030141.019181.084930.9726781.273971.490411.457530.521858




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([60,330,440,370,220,200,260,280,210,230,370,270,420,440,340,210,])
array_2 = np.array([0.99726,1.05753,1.27945,1.45628,0.8,0.726027,0.975342,1.26776,1.03014,1.01918,1.08493,0.972678,1.27397,1.49041,1.45753,0.521858,])
array_1_name = "The number of umpires and referees in Louisiana"
array_2_name = "Jet fuel used in Estonia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 3293 · Black Variable ID: 17583 · Red Variable ID: 24394
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0