about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,271 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Butter consumption and the second variable is Republic Services' stock price (RSG).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As butter consumption increased, so did the demand for toast. With more people enjoying toast, there was a surge in the need for bread, leading to higher production and distribution. Republic Services, as a waste management company, experienced a significant uptick in the disposal of bread-related packaging and food waste. This unexpected toast-driven demand was undoubtedly the rise and spread of Republic Services' stock price.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Photorealism] Generate an image of a cluttered kitchen counter, with a nearly empty butter dish prominently displayed. An overflowing garbage can nearby contains empty bread bags, indicating elevated toast consumption. In the background, incorporate a computer screen displaying Republic Services' stock price chart, highlighting a clear upward trend. Create a realistic and detailed scene capturing the essence of high butter and bread consumption, alongside the visual representation of the stock value trend. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Photorealism a meme A TIME magazine cover image High-tech
ChatGPT: Photorealism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG), in the following situation: Because as butter consumption increased, so did the demand for toast, leading to more bread bags being thrown out. Republic Services makes money from waste disposal, and the increase in bread bags led to an increase in their stock price!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Picture a kitchen counter with a butter dish that's nearly empty, indicating high butter consumption. Nearby, a garbage can overflows with bread bags, showing the increased demand for toast. In the background, a computer screen displays Republic Services' stock price chart, clearly showing an upward trend in their stock value.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Photorealism ] and depicting this scene: Picture a kitchen counter with a butter dish that's nearly empty, indicating high butter consumption. Nearby, a garbage can overflows with bread bags, showing the increased demand for toast. In the background, a computer screen displays Republic Services' stock price chart, clearly showing an upward trend in their stock value. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Photorealism] Generate an image of a cluttered kitchen counter, with a nearly empty butter dish prominently displayed. An overflowing garbage can nearby contains empty bread bags, indicating elevated toast consumption. In the background, incorporate a computer screen displaying Republic Services' stock price chart, highlighting a clear upward trend. Create a realistic and detailed scene capturing the essence of high butter and bread consumption, alongside the visual representation of the stock value trend.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Butter consumption caused Republic Services' stock price (RSG) to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Putting Butter in Your Utter: A Study on the Clutter of Butter Consumption and the Stock Price Flutter of Republic Service's RSG

The Journal of Culinary Finance and Market Trends

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9078598 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Putting Butter in Your Utter: A Study on the Clutter of Butter Consumption and the Stock Price Flutter of Republic Service's RSG"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious coupling of butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG), embracing the dairy delight and the financial flight. Utilizing data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team embarked on a valiant expedition to answer the curious question: "Is there a link between butter and stock price that’s not just a mere coincidence, but a statistical dance of significance?"

Through rigorous analysis, we unearthed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9078598 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2021. Our findings set the stage for a bountiful banquet of illuminating revelations, proving that the butter you sputter and the RSG stock price flutter are not merely happenstance, but two peas in a data pod. This research aims to pave the way for future exploration into the whimsical world of unexpected connections between culinary customs and financial markets.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Putting Butter in Your Utter: A Study on the Clutter of Butter Consumption and the Stock Price Flutter of Republic Service's RSG"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious coupling of butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG), embracing the dairy delight and the financial flight. Utilizing data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team embarked on a valiant expedition to answer the curious question: "Is there a link between butter and stock price that’s not just a mere coincidence, but a statistical dance of significance?"

Through rigorous analysis, we unearthed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9078598 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2021. Our findings set the stage for a bountiful banquet of illuminating revelations, proving that the butter you sputter and the RSG stock price flutter are not merely happenstance, but two peas in a data pod. This research aims to pave the way for future exploration into the whimsical world of unexpected connections between culinary customs and financial markets.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The intersection of culinary customs and financial markets has long been a subject shrouded in mystery and marinated in skepticism. One might be tempted to dismiss the notion that butter consumption could have any bearing on the stock price of Republic Services (RSG) as utter nonsense. After all, what could the spreadability of butter possibly have in common with the fluctuation of stock prices?

However, as the old adage goes, "the proof of the pudding is in the eating." In this case, the proof lies in the carefully collated data sourced from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), which forms the crux of our rigorous examination. The aim of this study is to butter up the appetite of researchers interested in the unexplored corridors of the financial culinary world and garnishing the conversation with a sprinkle of statistical scrutiny.

This paper aims to unveil a correlation that’s as smooth as butter, and as robust as a stock portfolio – a correlation so strong that it might make one wonder if there's more to the churn of butter and the churn of stock prices than meets the eye. Through a thorough empirical analysis, we aim to spread some light on this apparently slippery issue and perhaps, enlighten the skeptics about the potential tangy connection between butter consumption and the stock price flutter of Republic Services' RSG.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Putting Butter in Your Utter: A Study on the Clutter of Butter Consumption and the Stock Price Flutter of Republic Service's RSG"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious coupling of butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG), embracing the dairy delight and the financial flight. Utilizing data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team embarked on a valiant expedition to answer the curious question: "Is there a link between butter and stock price that’s not just a mere coincidence, but a statistical dance of significance?"

Through rigorous analysis, we unearthed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9078598 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2021. Our findings set the stage for a bountiful banquet of illuminating revelations, proving that the butter you sputter and the RSG stock price flutter are not merely happenstance, but two peas in a data pod. This research aims to pave the way for future exploration into the whimsical world of unexpected connections between culinary customs and financial markets.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of culinary customs and financial markets has long been a subject shrouded in mystery and marinated in skepticism. One might be tempted to dismiss the notion that butter consumption could have any bearing on the stock price of Republic Services (RSG) as utter nonsense. After all, what could the spreadability of butter possibly have in common with the fluctuation of stock prices?
However, as the old adage goes, "the proof of the pudding is in the eating." In this case, the proof lies in the carefully collated data sourced from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), which forms the crux of our rigorous examination. The aim of this study is to butter up the appetite of researchers interested in the unexplored corridors of the financial culinary world and garnishing the conversation with a sprinkle of statistical scrutiny.
This paper aims to unveil a correlation that’s as smooth as butter, and as robust as a stock portfolio – a correlation so strong that it might make one wonder if there's more to the churn of butter and the churn of stock prices than meets the eye. Through a thorough empirical analysis, we aim to spread some light on this apparently slippery issue and perhaps, enlighten the skeptics about the potential tangy connection between butter consumption and the stock price flutter of Republic Services' RSG.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature on the unexpected convergence of dietary habits and financial indicators is scarce but nonetheless intriguing. Smith et al. (2015) examined the relationship between margarine consumption and the volatility of automotive stocks, shedding light on the potential influence of edible fats on market dynamics. Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the impact of olive oil consumption on real estate investment trusts, uncovering a tangy connection that left readers both bemused and enlightened.

Turning to the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Big Short" by Michael Lewis offers a captivating exploration of the 2008 financial crisis, reminding readers of the intricate web of factors that can influence stock prices. On a lighter note, "Kitchen Confidential" by Anthony Bourdain provides a flavorful account of the culinary world, setting the stage for a delectable investigation into the potential interplay of butter consumption and stock price fluctuations.

In the realm of fiction, "American Psycho" by Bret Easton Ellis ushers readers into the cutthroat world of finance and consumer culture, prompting contemplation of the potential influence of dietary choices on market behavior. "Chocolat" by Joanne Harris offers a whimsical tale of confectionery and community, inviting readers to ponder the sweet surprises that may lurk within the data on butter consumption and stock prices.

Internet memes such as the famous "This is fine" dog surrounded by fire humorously encapsulate the feeling of navigating through unforeseen correlations, reminding us that sometimes, the unexpected intertwining of disparate elements can create a comically bewildering landscape. Similarly, the "Distracted Boyfriend" meme gestures towards the allure of unexplored connections, hinting at the tantalizing prospect of uncovering unexpected relationships between seemingly unrelated phenomena.

In summary, the literature landscape surrounding the curious correlation between butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price, while sparse, holds promise for a delightful exploration that may transcend the ordinary boundaries of culinary and financial scholarship.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Putting Butter in Your Utter: A Study on the Clutter of Butter Consumption and the Stock Price Flutter of Republic Service's RSG"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious coupling of butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG), embracing the dairy delight and the financial flight. Utilizing data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team embarked on a valiant expedition to answer the curious question: "Is there a link between butter and stock price that’s not just a mere coincidence, but a statistical dance of significance?"

Through rigorous analysis, we unearthed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9078598 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2021. Our findings set the stage for a bountiful banquet of illuminating revelations, proving that the butter you sputter and the RSG stock price flutter are not merely happenstance, but two peas in a data pod. This research aims to pave the way for future exploration into the whimsical world of unexpected connections between culinary customs and financial markets.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of culinary customs and financial markets has long been a subject shrouded in mystery and marinated in skepticism. One might be tempted to dismiss the notion that butter consumption could have any bearing on the stock price of Republic Services (RSG) as utter nonsense. After all, what could the spreadability of butter possibly have in common with the fluctuation of stock prices?
However, as the old adage goes, "the proof of the pudding is in the eating." In this case, the proof lies in the carefully collated data sourced from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), which forms the crux of our rigorous examination. The aim of this study is to butter up the appetite of researchers interested in the unexplored corridors of the financial culinary world and garnishing the conversation with a sprinkle of statistical scrutiny.
This paper aims to unveil a correlation that’s as smooth as butter, and as robust as a stock portfolio – a correlation so strong that it might make one wonder if there's more to the churn of butter and the churn of stock prices than meets the eye. Through a thorough empirical analysis, we aim to spread some light on this apparently slippery issue and perhaps, enlighten the skeptics about the potential tangy connection between butter consumption and the stock price flutter of Republic Services' RSG.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodological approach employed in this study marinated in a concoction of data mining, statistical analysis, and financial modeling, forming a recipe as complex and intriguing as a seven-layer cake. The core ingredient utilized in this endeavor was the meticulous collection of butter consumption data from the USDA and Republic Services' (RSG) stock price data from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), creating a rich and delectable dataset for analysis.

The first step in our gastronomic journey involved extracting weekly butter consumption data from the USDA's butter production and sales reports, which provided a detailed record of butter consumption spanning from 2002 to 2021. This dataset was then churned, whisked, and folded to ensure that only the creamiest and most reliable data points were included in our analysis.

Simultaneously, the RSG stock price data was procured from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), delivering a sumptuous menu of daily stock prices, trading volumes, and other delectable financial metrics. To ensure consistency and completeness, this dataset underwent a meticulous quality check, sifting out any data points that were past their expiration date, so to speak.

Once the two datasets were collected and prepared, they were combined and blended into a single harmonious mixture, creating a buttery smooth fusion of culinary and financial data. This fusion underwent a rigorous process of time series analysis, employing AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models, vector autoregression (VAR) models, and other statistical tools to extract the underlying patterns and correlations.

Furthermore, a robust analysis was conducted to control for potential confounding variables such as macroeconomic indicators, market sentiment, and other financial variables that could introduce noise into our investigation. This involved a delicate balancing act akin to a high-wire circus performance, ensuring that we extracted the pure essence of the butter-stock price relationship.

In addition, sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of our findings, akin to tasting a dish multiple times to confirm its flavor consistency. Various sub-period analyses and alternative model specifications were explored to ensure that the observed correlation between butter consumption and RSG stock prices was not a fluke, but rather a well-founded, meaningful connection.

Upon completion of the analyses, the strength of the correlation between butter consumption and RSG stock prices was assessed using correlation coefficients and statistical significance tests, offering a clear measure of the degree to which the two variables moved in harmonious sync. The findings were like uncovering the perfect blend of seasonings in a recipe – a delightful and satisfying revelation.

In summary, the methodological approach adopted in this study was akin to crafting a gourmet meal, combining the finest ingredients, meticulous preparation, and expert blending to unearth the flavorful relationship between butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price flutter.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9078598, r-squared of 0.8242094, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Putting Butter in Your Utter: A Study on the Clutter of Butter Consumption and the Stock Price Flutter of Republic Service's RSG"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious coupling of butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG), embracing the dairy delight and the financial flight. Utilizing data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team embarked on a valiant expedition to answer the curious question: "Is there a link between butter and stock price that’s not just a mere coincidence, but a statistical dance of significance?"

Through rigorous analysis, we unearthed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9078598 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2021. Our findings set the stage for a bountiful banquet of illuminating revelations, proving that the butter you sputter and the RSG stock price flutter are not merely happenstance, but two peas in a data pod. This research aims to pave the way for future exploration into the whimsical world of unexpected connections between culinary customs and financial markets.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of culinary customs and financial markets has long been a subject shrouded in mystery and marinated in skepticism. One might be tempted to dismiss the notion that butter consumption could have any bearing on the stock price of Republic Services (RSG) as utter nonsense. After all, what could the spreadability of butter possibly have in common with the fluctuation of stock prices?
However, as the old adage goes, "the proof of the pudding is in the eating." In this case, the proof lies in the carefully collated data sourced from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), which forms the crux of our rigorous examination. The aim of this study is to butter up the appetite of researchers interested in the unexplored corridors of the financial culinary world and garnishing the conversation with a sprinkle of statistical scrutiny.
This paper aims to unveil a correlation that’s as smooth as butter, and as robust as a stock portfolio – a correlation so strong that it might make one wonder if there's more to the churn of butter and the churn of stock prices than meets the eye. Through a thorough empirical analysis, we aim to spread some light on this apparently slippery issue and perhaps, enlighten the skeptics about the potential tangy connection between butter consumption and the stock price flutter of Republic Services' RSG.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our study reveal a strikingly strong correlation between butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG). The correlation coefficient of 0.9078598 suggests a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The R-squared value of 0.8242094 indicates that approximately 82.42% of the variability in RSG stock price can be explained by changes in butter consumption.

The extraordinarily low p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis that there is no association between butter consumption and RSG stock price. This implies that the observed correlation is not merely a fluke, but a statistically significant finding.

These findings underscore the potential influence of butter consumption on the stock price dynamics of Republic Services. While the precise mechanisms underlying this association remain enigmatic, our results beckon further investigation into the tantalizing interplay between dietary habits and financial market trends.

Figure 1 presents a scatterplot visually illustrating the robust correlation between butter consumption and RSG stock price. The tightly clustered data points form a compelling linear pattern, affirming the substantial relationship between these variables.

In conclusion, our research sheds light on the uncharted territory of butter consumption and stock price dynamics. This study not only enriches our understanding of the peculiar connection between culinary proclivities and financial markets but also serves as a savory appetizer for future explorations into the unexpected interplay of seemingly unrelated realms.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Putting Butter in Your Utter: A Study on the Clutter of Butter Consumption and the Stock Price Flutter of Republic Service's RSG"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious coupling of butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG), embracing the dairy delight and the financial flight. Utilizing data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team embarked on a valiant expedition to answer the curious question: "Is there a link between butter and stock price that’s not just a mere coincidence, but a statistical dance of significance?"

Through rigorous analysis, we unearthed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9078598 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2021. Our findings set the stage for a bountiful banquet of illuminating revelations, proving that the butter you sputter and the RSG stock price flutter are not merely happenstance, but two peas in a data pod. This research aims to pave the way for future exploration into the whimsical world of unexpected connections between culinary customs and financial markets.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature on the unexpected convergence of dietary habits and financial indicators is scarce but nonetheless intriguing. Smith et al. (2015) examined the relationship between margarine consumption and the volatility of automotive stocks, shedding light on the potential influence of edible fats on market dynamics. Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the impact of olive oil consumption on real estate investment trusts, uncovering a tangy connection that left readers both bemused and enlightened.
Turning to the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Big Short" by Michael Lewis offers a captivating exploration of the 2008 financial crisis, reminding readers of the intricate web of factors that can influence stock prices. On a lighter note, "Kitchen Confidential" by Anthony Bourdain provides a flavorful account of the culinary world, setting the stage for a delectable investigation into the potential interplay of butter consumption and stock price fluctuations.
In the realm of fiction, "American Psycho" by Bret Easton Ellis ushers readers into the cutthroat world of finance and consumer culture, prompting contemplation of the potential influence of dietary choices on market behavior. "Chocolat" by Joanne Harris offers a whimsical tale of confectionery and community, inviting readers to ponder the sweet surprises that may lurk within the data on butter consumption and stock prices.
Internet memes such as the famous "This is fine" dog surrounded by fire humorously encapsulate the feeling of navigating through unforeseen correlations, reminding us that sometimes, the unexpected intertwining of disparate elements can create a comically bewildering landscape. Similarly, the "Distracted Boyfriend" meme gestures towards the allure of unexplored connections, hinting at the tantalizing prospect of uncovering unexpected relationships between seemingly unrelated phenomena.
In summary, the literature landscape surrounding the curious correlation between butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price, while sparse, holds promise for a delightful exploration that may transcend the ordinary boundaries of culinary and financial scholarship.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study reveal a strikingly strong correlation between butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG). The correlation coefficient of 0.9078598 suggests a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The R-squared value of 0.8242094 indicates that approximately 82.42% of the variability in RSG stock price can be explained by changes in butter consumption.
The extraordinarily low p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis that there is no association between butter consumption and RSG stock price. This implies that the observed correlation is not merely a fluke, but a statistically significant finding.
These findings underscore the potential influence of butter consumption on the stock price dynamics of Republic Services. While the precise mechanisms underlying this association remain enigmatic, our results beckon further investigation into the tantalizing interplay between dietary habits and financial market trends.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot visually illustrating the robust correlation between butter consumption and RSG stock price. The tightly clustered data points form a compelling linear pattern, affirming the substantial relationship between these variables.
In conclusion, our research sheds light on the uncharted territory of butter consumption and stock price dynamics. This study not only enriches our understanding of the peculiar connection between culinary proclivities and financial markets but also serves as a savory appetizer for future explorations into the unexpected interplay of seemingly unrelated realms.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study provide compelling support for the previously scarce literature on unexpected connections between dietary habits and financial indicators. The robust positive correlation between butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG) echoes the prior work of Smith et al. (2015) on margarine consumption and automotive stocks, demonstrating that edible fats can indeed exert a flavorful influence on market dynamics. Similarly, the tangy connection uncovered by Doe and Jones (2018) between olive oil consumption and real estate investment trusts finds resonance in our study's findings, affirming the potential impact of culinary customs on financial markets.

Furthermore, our results underscore the whimsical potential for the intertwining of seemingly unrelated realms, echoing the enlightening message embedded within "Kitchen Confidential" by Anthony Bourdain and "Chocolat" by Joanne Harris. The delectable investigation into the potential interplay of butter consumption and stock price fluctuations has not only yielded empirical evidence but has also added a savory layer to the literary landscape of culinary and financial scholarship.

The extraordinarily low p-value offers firm rejection of the null hypothesis, reminding us that the observed correlation is not just a fluke but a statistically significant revelation. This robust statistical significance paves the way for a bountiful banquet of future explorations into the whimsical world of unexpected connections between dietary habits and financial market trends.

Our findings not only enrich the scholarly discourse but also offer a delightful departure from the ordinary boundaries of culinary and financial investigation, echoing the comically bewildering landscape humorously encapsulated in internet memes such as the "This is fine" dog surrounded by fire and the "Distracted Boyfriend." The unexpected convergence of butter consumption and RSG stock price, while initially bemusing, has now been firmly established as a statistically significant and substantial relationship, serving as a savory appetizer for future explorations into the potential interplay of seemingly unrelated realms.

In summary, our research stands as a testament to the whimsical potential for unexpected connections between culinary customs and financial markets, providing empirical evidence to support the existence of a statistically significant correlation between butter consumption and RSG stock price, and beckoning forth a deliciously intriguing landscape of future research endeavors in this unexpected domain.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Putting Butter in Your Utter: A Study on the Clutter of Butter Consumption and the Stock Price Flutter of Republic Service's RSG"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the curious coupling of butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG), embracing the dairy delight and the financial flight. Utilizing data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team embarked on a valiant expedition to answer the curious question: "Is there a link between butter and stock price that’s not just a mere coincidence, but a statistical dance of significance?"

Through rigorous analysis, we unearthed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9078598 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2021. Our findings set the stage for a bountiful banquet of illuminating revelations, proving that the butter you sputter and the RSG stock price flutter are not merely happenstance, but two peas in a data pod. This research aims to pave the way for future exploration into the whimsical world of unexpected connections between culinary customs and financial markets.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The intersection of culinary customs and financial markets has long been a subject shrouded in mystery and marinated in skepticism. One might be tempted to dismiss the notion that butter consumption could have any bearing on the stock price of Republic Services (RSG) as utter nonsense. After all, what could the spreadability of butter possibly have in common with the fluctuation of stock prices?
However, as the old adage goes, "the proof of the pudding is in the eating." In this case, the proof lies in the carefully collated data sourced from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), which forms the crux of our rigorous examination. The aim of this study is to butter up the appetite of researchers interested in the unexplored corridors of the financial culinary world and garnishing the conversation with a sprinkle of statistical scrutiny.
This paper aims to unveil a correlation that’s as smooth as butter, and as robust as a stock portfolio – a correlation so strong that it might make one wonder if there's more to the churn of butter and the churn of stock prices than meets the eye. Through a thorough empirical analysis, we aim to spread some light on this apparently slippery issue and perhaps, enlighten the skeptics about the potential tangy connection between butter consumption and the stock price flutter of Republic Services' RSG.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study reveal a strikingly strong correlation between butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG). The correlation coefficient of 0.9078598 suggests a robust positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The R-squared value of 0.8242094 indicates that approximately 82.42% of the variability in RSG stock price can be explained by changes in butter consumption.
The extraordinarily low p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis that there is no association between butter consumption and RSG stock price. This implies that the observed correlation is not merely a fluke, but a statistically significant finding.
These findings underscore the potential influence of butter consumption on the stock price dynamics of Republic Services. While the precise mechanisms underlying this association remain enigmatic, our results beckon further investigation into the tantalizing interplay between dietary habits and financial market trends.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot visually illustrating the robust correlation between butter consumption and RSG stock price. The tightly clustered data points form a compelling linear pattern, affirming the substantial relationship between these variables.
In conclusion, our research sheds light on the uncharted territory of butter consumption and stock price dynamics. This study not only enriches our understanding of the peculiar connection between culinary proclivities and financial markets but also serves as a savory appetizer for future explorations into the unexpected interplay of seemingly unrelated realms.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has churned out compelling evidence of a significant correlation between butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG). The robust positive relationship between these variables is as smooth as a buttercream frosting, leaving little room for doubt about the influence of dietary habits on stock market dynamics. The tantalizing aroma of these findings beckons further exploration into the whimsical world of culinary customs and financial markets.

While our study has brought to light the potential impact of butter consumption on stock price fluctuations, the underlying mechanisms of this association remain shrouded in mystery, much like the enigma of whether one should reach for another pat of butter or exercise restraint. Nevertheless, our findings serve as a delectable appetizer, whetting the appetite of researchers for future investigations into the unexpected interplay of seemingly disparate realms. A deeper dive into the butter-stock price connection might help "butter toast" the relevance of culinary habits in shaping market trends and could serve as a "spreadsheet" for exploring uncharted territories of financial analysis.

In light of our buttery smooth findings, we assert that further investigation into the connection between butter consumption and RSG stock price would be an utter waste of time and resources. It seems that the age-old wisdom "butter makes everything better" may indeed extend to the realm of stock market dynamics, leaving no need for further research in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Putting Butter in Your Utter: A Study on the Clutter of Butter Consumption and the Stock Price Flutter of Republic Service's RSG. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Culinary Finance and Market Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Putting Butter in Your Utter: A Study on the Clutter of Butter Consumption and the Stock Price Flutter of Republic Service's RSG. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association for Dairy Enthusiasts and Financial Analysis (ADEFA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Putting Butter in Your Utter: A Study on the Clutter of Butter Consumption and the Stock Price Flutter of Republic Service's RSG with an abstract of This paper delves into the curious coupling of butter consumption and Republic Services' stock price (RSG), embracing the dairy delight and the financial flight. Utilizing data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team embarked on a valiant expedition to answer the curious question: "Is there a link between butter and stock price that’s not just a mere coincidence, but a statistical dance of significance?"
Through rigorous analysis, we unearthed a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9078598 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2002 to 2021. Our findings set the stage for a bountiful banquet of illuminating revelations, proving that the butter you sputter and the RSG stock price flutter are not merely happenstance, but two peas in a data pod. This research aims to pave the way for future exploration into the whimsical world of unexpected connections between culinary customs and financial markets.

ChatGPT:

butter consumption, stock price correlation, Republic Services RSG, USDA data, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, financial markets, butter consumption impact, stock price analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Butter consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Butter in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Butter consumption

Republic Services' stock price (RSG)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Republic Services (RSG) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Republic Services' stock price (RSG)

Correlation r = 0.9078598 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8242094 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Republic Services' stock price (RSG)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Butter consumption) over the 20 years from 2002 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.2E-8. 0.0000000324109323756080750000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 3.2E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 30,853,787 random variables You don't actually need 30 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.78, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Butter consumption (Pounds per person)4.44.54.54.54.74.7554.95.45.55.55.55.65.75.766.26.36.5
Republic Services' stock price (RSG) (Stock price)12.9314.1517.0922.4324.9327.1531.2224.9928.5830.0328.0129.6133.240.2743.4257.1167.5771.3789.7296.18




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.4,4.5,4.5,4.5,4.7,4.7,5,5,4.9,5.4,5.5,5.5,5.5,5.6,5.7,5.7,6,6.2,6.3,6.5,])
array_2 = np.array([12.93,14.15,17.09,22.43,24.93,27.15,31.22,24.99,28.58,30.03,28.01,29.61,33.2,40.27,43.42,57.11,67.57,71.37,89.72,96.18,])
array_1_name = "Butter consumption"
array_2_name = "Republic Services' stock price (RSG)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 3271 · Black Variable ID: 557 · Red Variable ID: 1743
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0