about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,215 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan and the second variable is Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon.  The chart goes from 1987 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the air in Muskegon cleared up, it created a vacuum effect, sucking the forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon towards it. It was like nature's way of saying, "Hey, let's stick together!" The trees just couldn't resist the fresh breeze from the Great Lakes, so they packed their leafy bags and leaf-t for a cleaner, greener lifestyle in Michigan. It's a 'tree-mendous' case of transcontinental arboreal relocation!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a surreal landscape with an industrial area in Muskegon, Michigan emitting dense smoke and pollutants into the atmosphere. The sky is veiled in a hazy, smog-filled atmosphere. Imagine airborne seeds from the remaining Amazon forest intertwining with pollution particles, forming a mesmerizing visual as they traverse the globe. The scene should convey a sense of magic realism as the seeds begin to germinate and grow into new trees in South America, amidst the backdrop of industrial pollution. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan and Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style Vaporwave High-tech Magic realism Cute cartoon
ChatGPT: Magic realism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan and Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon, in the following situation: The increased air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan caused the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon to increase due to the airborne seeds hitching a ride on pollution particles and creating a new forest paradise in South America.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Muskegon, Michigan, an industrial area releases thick smoke and pollutants into the air. The hazy sky is filled with smog. Against this backdrop, airborne seeds from the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon ride on pollution particles, creating a mystical scene as they travel across the globe and begin to sprout new trees in South America.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Magic realism ] and depicting this scene: In Muskegon, Michigan, an industrial area releases thick smoke and pollutants into the air. The hazy sky is filled with smog. Against this backdrop, airborne seeds from the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon ride on pollution particles, creating a mystical scene as they travel across the globe and begin to sprout new trees in South America. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a surreal landscape with an industrial area in Muskegon, Michigan emitting dense smoke and pollutants into the atmosphere. The sky is veiled in a hazy, smog-filled atmosphere. Imagine airborne seeds from the remaining Amazon forest intertwining with pollution particles, forming a mesmerizing visual as they traverse the globe. The scene should convey a sense of magic realism as the seeds begin to germinate and grow into new trees in South America, amidst the backdrop of industrial pollution.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan caused Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
A Breath of Fresh Air: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Quality in Muskegon, Michigan and Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon

The Journal of Ecological Connections

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan and Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Mongabay to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7814547 and p < 0.01 for 1987 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Air: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Quality in Muskegon, Michigan and Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the potential interconnectedness between air pollution levels in Muskegon, Michigan and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Mongabay, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1987 to 2022. The results yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7814547 and p < 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly disparate geographic entities. Our findings suggest that the air we breathe in Muskegon may indeed have an impact on the resilience of the Amazonian ecosystem. The implications of this study extend beyond mere atmospheric concerns, highlighting the intricate, albeit unexpected, ways in which environmental phenomena across the globe can be intertwined.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan and Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Air: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Quality in Muskegon, Michigan and Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the potential interconnectedness between air pollution levels in Muskegon, Michigan and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Mongabay, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1987 to 2022. The results yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7814547 and p < 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly disparate geographic entities. Our findings suggest that the air we breathe in Muskegon may indeed have an impact on the resilience of the Amazonian ecosystem. The implications of this study extend beyond mere atmospheric concerns, highlighting the intricate, albeit unexpected, ways in which environmental phenomena across the globe can be intertwined.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The quality of air in Muskegon, Michigan has been the subject of numerous studies and discussions, largely due to its potential impact on public health and well-being. Concurrently, the preservation of the sprawling rainforests in the Brazilian Amazon has garnered global attention as a critical aspect of biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation efforts. Through some serendipitous data mining and a dash of academic curiosity, our research team stumbled upon a potential link between these two disparate locales. As we delved into this unlikely connection, a confluence of punexpected findings emerged, challenging our initial assumptions and leading us down a veritable rabbit hole of environmental interconnectivity.

The title of our study, "A Breath of Fresh Air," was chosen with the careful intention of highlighting the breath-catching revelation that there may indeed be a subtle yet significant relationship between air quality in Muskegon and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. While it is punderstandable that such a correlation may seem far-fetched at first glance, the trove of data at our disposal compelled us to delve deeper into this unexplored terrain of environmental interconnectedness.

Our paper aims to present a thorough analysis of the intriguing relationship between these geographically distant regions, shedding light on the potential ramifications for both local air quality and global ecological resilience. This study embarks on a journey through the labyrinth of atmospheric and ecological phenomena, aiming to unveil the hidden threads that bind the air we breathe in Muskegon to the verdant canopies of the Amazon rainforest. With a touch of academic rigor and a healthy dose of punexpected twists, our investigation seeks to bring to light the notion that the air we breathe and the forests that thrive may indeed be more entwined than meets the eye.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan and Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Air: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Quality in Muskegon, Michigan and Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the potential interconnectedness between air pollution levels in Muskegon, Michigan and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Mongabay, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1987 to 2022. The results yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7814547 and p < 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly disparate geographic entities. Our findings suggest that the air we breathe in Muskegon may indeed have an impact on the resilience of the Amazonian ecosystem. The implications of this study extend beyond mere atmospheric concerns, highlighting the intricate, albeit unexpected, ways in which environmental phenomena across the globe can be intertwined.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The quality of air in Muskegon, Michigan has been the subject of numerous studies and discussions, largely due to its potential impact on public health and well-being. Concurrently, the preservation of the sprawling rainforests in the Brazilian Amazon has garnered global attention as a critical aspect of biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation efforts. Through some serendipitous data mining and a dash of academic curiosity, our research team stumbled upon a potential link between these two disparate locales. As we delved into this unlikely connection, a confluence of punexpected findings emerged, challenging our initial assumptions and leading us down a veritable rabbit hole of environmental interconnectivity.
The title of our study, "A Breath of Fresh Air," was chosen with the careful intention of highlighting the breath-catching revelation that there may indeed be a subtle yet significant relationship between air quality in Muskegon and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. While it is punderstandable that such a correlation may seem far-fetched at first glance, the trove of data at our disposal compelled us to delve deeper into this unexplored terrain of environmental interconnectedness.
Our paper aims to present a thorough analysis of the intriguing relationship between these geographically distant regions, shedding light on the potential ramifications for both local air quality and global ecological resilience. This study embarks on a journey through the labyrinth of atmospheric and ecological phenomena, aiming to unveil the hidden threads that bind the air we breathe in Muskegon to the verdant canopies of the Amazon rainforest. With a touch of academic rigor and a healthy dose of punexpected twists, our investigation seeks to bring to light the notion that the air we breathe and the forests that thrive may indeed be more entwined than meets the eye.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between air quality in Muskegon, Michigan and forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon has garnered limited attention in the literature. Nonetheless, a few notable studies have touched upon related environmental interconnections. Smith et al. (2015) examined the impact of air pollution on transcontinental atmospheric patterns, hinting at the potential for far-reaching consequences on remote ecosystems. Doe and Jones (2018) explored the intricate web of global environmental phenomena, making passing reference to the potential implications of localized air quality on distant forest ecosystems.

Moving beyond conventional academic literature, non-fiction works such as "The Hidden Life of Trees" by Peter Wohlleben and "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan offer deep insights into the delicate balance of forest ecosystems and the broader interconnectedness of environmental systems. Likewise, fictional accounts such as "State of Wonder" by Ann Patchett and "Where the Crawdads Sing" by Delia Owens delve into the mystique of untamed natural landscapes, providing allegorical glimpses of the underlying ecological tapestry.

In conducting this literature review, the research team also encountered seemingly unrelated sources, including grocery store receipts, traffic reports, and even interpretive dance performances. These unlikely reservoirs of information, while not traditionally considered scholarly sources, provided unexpected and punderful perspectives on the potential interplay between air quality in Muskegon and the preservation of the Brazilian Amazon rainforest.

Beyond the traditional bounds of academic literature, the tides of interconnectedness have drawn us into a whirlwind of unexpected insights and punderful diversions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan and Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Mongabay . You used data from 1987 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Air: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Quality in Muskegon, Michigan and Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the potential interconnectedness between air pollution levels in Muskegon, Michigan and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Mongabay, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1987 to 2022. The results yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7814547 and p < 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly disparate geographic entities. Our findings suggest that the air we breathe in Muskegon may indeed have an impact on the resilience of the Amazonian ecosystem. The implications of this study extend beyond mere atmospheric concerns, highlighting the intricate, albeit unexpected, ways in which environmental phenomena across the globe can be intertwined.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The quality of air in Muskegon, Michigan has been the subject of numerous studies and discussions, largely due to its potential impact on public health and well-being. Concurrently, the preservation of the sprawling rainforests in the Brazilian Amazon has garnered global attention as a critical aspect of biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation efforts. Through some serendipitous data mining and a dash of academic curiosity, our research team stumbled upon a potential link between these two disparate locales. As we delved into this unlikely connection, a confluence of punexpected findings emerged, challenging our initial assumptions and leading us down a veritable rabbit hole of environmental interconnectivity.
The title of our study, "A Breath of Fresh Air," was chosen with the careful intention of highlighting the breath-catching revelation that there may indeed be a subtle yet significant relationship between air quality in Muskegon and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. While it is punderstandable that such a correlation may seem far-fetched at first glance, the trove of data at our disposal compelled us to delve deeper into this unexplored terrain of environmental interconnectedness.
Our paper aims to present a thorough analysis of the intriguing relationship between these geographically distant regions, shedding light on the potential ramifications for both local air quality and global ecological resilience. This study embarks on a journey through the labyrinth of atmospheric and ecological phenomena, aiming to unveil the hidden threads that bind the air we breathe in Muskegon to the verdant canopies of the Amazon rainforest. With a touch of academic rigor and a healthy dose of punexpected twists, our investigation seeks to bring to light the notion that the air we breathe and the forests that thrive may indeed be more entwined than meets the eye.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To explore the purported association between air quality in Muskegon, Michigan and forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon, a mixed-methods approach was employed to wrangle the available data. Our research team spent countless hours poring over datasets obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Mongabay, selecting only the choicest bits of information from the digital smorgasbord spanning the years 1987 to 2022. This exhaustive process involved sifting through an expanse of data akin to traversing the Amazon itself, albeit in the digital realm.

The air quality data for Muskegon was obtained from the EPA's Air Quality System database, encompassing measurements of various pollutants such as particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and ozone (O3). Meanwhile, the forest cover data for the Brazilian Amazon was sourced from Mongabay, offering a glimpse into the sprawling canopies and their resilience over time.

In order to establish a temporal connection between these disparate geographical entities, a rigorous process of data cleansing, transformation, and normalization was executed. Through various statistical analyses and modeling techniques, such as time series analysis and spatial econometrics, the research team sought to discern any discernible patterns or associations between air pollution levels in Muskegon and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon.

Furthermore, the spatial dimension of the data was not overlooked, as geographic information system (GIS) tools were employed to map out the geographical spread of air pollution levels in Muskegon and the distribution of forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. This cartographic endeavor allowed for a visual depiction of the spatial interplay between these two distinct yet interconnected ecological landscapes.

The statistical methods utilized to quantify the relationship between air quality in Muskegon and forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon incorporated bivariate correlations, regression analyses, and perhaps a touch of statistical alchemy. The primary purpose was to seek out and quantify any semblance of a relationship between air pollution levels in Muskegon and the potential impact on the preservation of the Amazonian rainforest. The algorithms used were as multifaceted as the intertwining branches of the Amazonian trees, invoking a sense of computational exploration akin to traversing the tangled undergrowth of the rainforest floor.

Despite the seemingly insurmountable task of amalgamating data from disparate sources and plying through the virtual wilderness of statistical analyses, the research team navigated the labyrinthine pathways of interconnected environmental data with an almost daredevil-like perseverance. The results, as we shall see, yielded insights into the heretofore unsuspected relationship between air quality in Muskegon and the verdant curtains of the Brazilian Amazon.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan and Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Mongabay .

For the time period 1987 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7814547, r-squared of 0.6106715, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Air: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Quality in Muskegon, Michigan and Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the potential interconnectedness between air pollution levels in Muskegon, Michigan and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Mongabay, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1987 to 2022. The results yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7814547 and p < 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly disparate geographic entities. Our findings suggest that the air we breathe in Muskegon may indeed have an impact on the resilience of the Amazonian ecosystem. The implications of this study extend beyond mere atmospheric concerns, highlighting the intricate, albeit unexpected, ways in which environmental phenomena across the globe can be intertwined.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The quality of air in Muskegon, Michigan has been the subject of numerous studies and discussions, largely due to its potential impact on public health and well-being. Concurrently, the preservation of the sprawling rainforests in the Brazilian Amazon has garnered global attention as a critical aspect of biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation efforts. Through some serendipitous data mining and a dash of academic curiosity, our research team stumbled upon a potential link between these two disparate locales. As we delved into this unlikely connection, a confluence of punexpected findings emerged, challenging our initial assumptions and leading us down a veritable rabbit hole of environmental interconnectivity.
The title of our study, "A Breath of Fresh Air," was chosen with the careful intention of highlighting the breath-catching revelation that there may indeed be a subtle yet significant relationship between air quality in Muskegon and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. While it is punderstandable that such a correlation may seem far-fetched at first glance, the trove of data at our disposal compelled us to delve deeper into this unexplored terrain of environmental interconnectedness.
Our paper aims to present a thorough analysis of the intriguing relationship between these geographically distant regions, shedding light on the potential ramifications for both local air quality and global ecological resilience. This study embarks on a journey through the labyrinth of atmospheric and ecological phenomena, aiming to unveil the hidden threads that bind the air we breathe in Muskegon to the verdant canopies of the Amazon rainforest. With a touch of academic rigor and a healthy dose of punexpected twists, our investigation seeks to bring to light the notion that the air we breathe and the forests that thrive may indeed be more entwined than meets the eye.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The examination of the relationship between air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7814547, indicating a moderately strong positive association between these two variables. This correlation was found to be statistically significant, with a p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the robustness of the observed relationship. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6106715 implies that approximately 61.07% of the variation in forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon can be explained by the levels of air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan.

The scatterplot (see Fig. 1) further illustrates the strong positive correlation between air pollution in Muskegon and remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. The data points exhibit a discernible upward trend, reaffirming the connection between these seemingly distant environmental factors.

These results not only highlight the statistical significance of the relationship but also underscore the potential implications for both local air quality in Muskegon and the ecological resilience of the Brazilian Amazon. The findings lend support to the notion that environmental phenomena can transcend geographical boundaries and have far-reaching consequences.

The significant correlation uncovered in this research underscores the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate environmental factors, serving as a punderfully intriguing reminder of the complexity of ecological systems. This unexpected connection between the air quality in Muskegon and the forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon serves as a testament to the serendipitous nature of scientific inquiry, revealing the often punforeseen relationships that underpin our natural world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan and Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Air: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Quality in Muskegon, Michigan and Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the potential interconnectedness between air pollution levels in Muskegon, Michigan and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Mongabay, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1987 to 2022. The results yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7814547 and p < 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly disparate geographic entities. Our findings suggest that the air we breathe in Muskegon may indeed have an impact on the resilience of the Amazonian ecosystem. The implications of this study extend beyond mere atmospheric concerns, highlighting the intricate, albeit unexpected, ways in which environmental phenomena across the globe can be intertwined.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between air quality in Muskegon, Michigan and forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon has garnered limited attention in the literature. Nonetheless, a few notable studies have touched upon related environmental interconnections. Smith et al. (2015) examined the impact of air pollution on transcontinental atmospheric patterns, hinting at the potential for far-reaching consequences on remote ecosystems. Doe and Jones (2018) explored the intricate web of global environmental phenomena, making passing reference to the potential implications of localized air quality on distant forest ecosystems.
Moving beyond conventional academic literature, non-fiction works such as "The Hidden Life of Trees" by Peter Wohlleben and "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan offer deep insights into the delicate balance of forest ecosystems and the broader interconnectedness of environmental systems. Likewise, fictional accounts such as "State of Wonder" by Ann Patchett and "Where the Crawdads Sing" by Delia Owens delve into the mystique of untamed natural landscapes, providing allegorical glimpses of the underlying ecological tapestry.
In conducting this literature review, the research team also encountered seemingly unrelated sources, including grocery store receipts, traffic reports, and even interpretive dance performances. These unlikely reservoirs of information, while not traditionally considered scholarly sources, provided unexpected and punderful perspectives on the potential interplay between air quality in Muskegon and the preservation of the Brazilian Amazon rainforest.
Beyond the traditional bounds of academic literature, the tides of interconnectedness have drawn us into a whirlwind of unexpected insights and punderful diversions.

[[RESULTS]]
The examination of the relationship between air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7814547, indicating a moderately strong positive association between these two variables. This correlation was found to be statistically significant, with a p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the robustness of the observed relationship. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6106715 implies that approximately 61.07% of the variation in forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon can be explained by the levels of air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan.
The scatterplot (see Fig. 1) further illustrates the strong positive correlation between air pollution in Muskegon and remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. The data points exhibit a discernible upward trend, reaffirming the connection between these seemingly distant environmental factors.
These results not only highlight the statistical significance of the relationship but also underscore the potential implications for both local air quality in Muskegon and the ecological resilience of the Brazilian Amazon. The findings lend support to the notion that environmental phenomena can transcend geographical boundaries and have far-reaching consequences.
The significant correlation uncovered in this research underscores the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate environmental factors, serving as a punderfully intriguing reminder of the complexity of ecological systems. This unexpected connection between the air quality in Muskegon and the forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon serves as a testament to the serendipitous nature of scientific inquiry, revealing the often punforeseen relationships that underpin our natural world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of the present study provide further credence to the notion that the air we breathe in Muskegon, Michigan may have a significant impact on the persistence of the Amazonian rainforest. The correlation coefficient of 0.7814547, along with a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforces the idea that the level of air pollution in Muskegon is associated with the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. This unexpected connection between seemingly distant environmental variables underscores the enigmatic ways in which our planet's ecological systems are intertwined.

Support for this seemingly whimsical connection can be traced back to the findings of Smith et al. (2015), who hinted at the far-reaching consequences of air pollution on remote ecosystems. Doe and Jones (2018), in their exploration of the global environmental web, also tangentially suggested the potential implications of localized air quality on distant forest ecosystems. Even the less orthodox sources encountered in our literature review, such as interpretive dance performances, provided unexpected perspectives on this interconnectedness, demonstrating that the winds of punderful diversions can sometimes lead us toward unexpected scholarly insights.

The significant correlation uncovered in this research not only reaffirms the statistical significance of the relationship but also underscores the broader implications for both local air quality in Muskegon and the ecological resilience of the Brazilian Amazon. These findings serve as a punderful reminder of the intricate tapestry of ecological systems, illustrating that the unexpected connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena can hold punforeseen importance.

While the precise mechanisms underlying this interconnection remain to be fully elucidated, the present study offers a glimpse into the serendipitous nature of scientific inquiry, revealing the often punforeseen relationships that underpin our natural world. This unexpected relationship between air quality in Muskegon and the forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon serves as a testament to the delightful unpredictability of academic research, demonstrating that scholarly pursuit can lead us down a path of serendipitous punderstanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan and Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
A Breath of Fresh Air: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Quality in Muskegon, Michigan and Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the potential interconnectedness between air pollution levels in Muskegon, Michigan and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Mongabay, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1987 to 2022. The results yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7814547 and p < 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly disparate geographic entities. Our findings suggest that the air we breathe in Muskegon may indeed have an impact on the resilience of the Amazonian ecosystem. The implications of this study extend beyond mere atmospheric concerns, highlighting the intricate, albeit unexpected, ways in which environmental phenomena across the globe can be intertwined.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The quality of air in Muskegon, Michigan has been the subject of numerous studies and discussions, largely due to its potential impact on public health and well-being. Concurrently, the preservation of the sprawling rainforests in the Brazilian Amazon has garnered global attention as a critical aspect of biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation efforts. Through some serendipitous data mining and a dash of academic curiosity, our research team stumbled upon a potential link between these two disparate locales. As we delved into this unlikely connection, a confluence of punexpected findings emerged, challenging our initial assumptions and leading us down a veritable rabbit hole of environmental interconnectivity.
The title of our study, "A Breath of Fresh Air," was chosen with the careful intention of highlighting the breath-catching revelation that there may indeed be a subtle yet significant relationship between air quality in Muskegon and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. While it is punderstandable that such a correlation may seem far-fetched at first glance, the trove of data at our disposal compelled us to delve deeper into this unexplored terrain of environmental interconnectedness.
Our paper aims to present a thorough analysis of the intriguing relationship between these geographically distant regions, shedding light on the potential ramifications for both local air quality and global ecological resilience. This study embarks on a journey through the labyrinth of atmospheric and ecological phenomena, aiming to unveil the hidden threads that bind the air we breathe in Muskegon to the verdant canopies of the Amazon rainforest. With a touch of academic rigor and a healthy dose of punexpected twists, our investigation seeks to bring to light the notion that the air we breathe and the forests that thrive may indeed be more entwined than meets the eye.

[[RESULTS]]
The examination of the relationship between air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7814547, indicating a moderately strong positive association between these two variables. This correlation was found to be statistically significant, with a p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the robustness of the observed relationship. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6106715 implies that approximately 61.07% of the variation in forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon can be explained by the levels of air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan.
The scatterplot (see Fig. 1) further illustrates the strong positive correlation between air pollution in Muskegon and remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. The data points exhibit a discernible upward trend, reaffirming the connection between these seemingly distant environmental factors.
These results not only highlight the statistical significance of the relationship but also underscore the potential implications for both local air quality in Muskegon and the ecological resilience of the Brazilian Amazon. The findings lend support to the notion that environmental phenomena can transcend geographical boundaries and have far-reaching consequences.
The significant correlation uncovered in this research underscores the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate environmental factors, serving as a punderfully intriguing reminder of the complexity of ecological systems. This unexpected connection between the air quality in Muskegon and the forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon serves as a testament to the serendipitous nature of scientific inquiry, revealing the often punforeseen relationships that underpin our natural world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unveiled an unexpected and statistically significant relationship between air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.7814547 and the p-value of less than 0.01 offer compelling evidence of the intertwined nature of these seemingly distant environmental phenomena. This finding provides a breath of fresh air in understanding the broader ecological interconnectivity that transcends geographical boundaries. It seems that the air we breathe in Muskegon does indeed have a tangible impact on the resilience of the Amazonian ecosystem, creating a link that is both remarkable and, dare I say, quite punexpected.

These results not only highlight the potential global ramifications of local air quality but also emphasize the multi-faceted nature of ecological systems, presenting a rather unexpected twist in the narrative of environmental interconnectivity. Our investigation, while initially met with skepticism, has shed light on the often overlooked, yet undeniably punexpected, relationships that shape our natural world. As we close the book on this chapter of research, it seems clear that no further exploration in this area is warranted - unless, of course, one enjoys uncovering punexpected connections that leave us breathless.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited A Breath of Fresh Air: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Quality in Muskegon, Michigan and Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Connections


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited A Breath of Fresh Air: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Quality in Muskegon, Michigan and Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Environmental Symbiosis and Biodiversity Conservation


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled A Breath of Fresh Air: Uncovering the Relationship Between Air Quality in Muskegon, Michigan and Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon with an abstract of This study explores the potential interconnectedness between air pollution levels in Muskegon, Michigan and the remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Mongabay, our research team conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1987 to 2022. The results yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7814547 and p < 0.01, indicating a significant relationship between these seemingly disparate geographic entities. Our findings suggest that the air we breathe in Muskegon may indeed have an impact on the resilience of the Amazonian ecosystem. The implications of this study extend beyond mere atmospheric concerns, highlighting the intricate, albeit unexpected, ways in which environmental phenomena across the globe can be intertwined.

ChatGPT:

Muskegon air quality, Amazon forest cover, air pollution correlation, Environmental Protection Agency data, Mongabay data, interconnected environmental phenomena, geographic entities relationship, Muskegon air impact on Amazon ecosystem, atmospheric concerns, global environmental interconnectedness

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Muskegon, MI
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan

Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon
Detailed data title: Estimated Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon
Source: Mongabay
See what else correlates with Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon

Correlation r = 0.7814547 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6106715 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 61.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan) over the 36 years from 1987 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.9E-8. 0.0000000185389117538955560000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.78 in 1.9E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 53,940,599 random variables You don't actually need 53 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 35 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 35 because we have two variables measured over a period of 36 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.61, 0.88 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan (Bad air quality days)11.845714.855115.315315.196121.12688.791219.3406614.207716.39349.944756.0439615.819214.80146.5843610.699611.257.818931.6460912.55235.82966.179781.404491.68353.292183.319514.46282.857143.278693.409093.932582.040822.50.3816792.419353.018872.88066
Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon (Sq. KM)374457037235203705750369202036809903667200365231036374103608350359019035769603559580354232035241003505930348428034588803431110341210033978103386160337325033657903358790335237033478003341910333690033306903322800331585033083103298550329012032796503268050




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([11.8457,14.8551,15.3153,15.1961,21.1268,8.79121,9.34066,14.2077,16.3934,9.94475,6.04396,15.8192,14.8014,6.58436,10.6996,11.25,7.81893,1.64609,12.5523,5.8296,6.17978,1.40449,1.6835,3.29218,3.3195,14.4628,2.85714,3.27869,3.40909,3.93258,2.04082,2.5,0.381679,2.41935,3.01887,2.88066,])
array_2 = np.array([3744570,3723520,3705750,3692020,3680990,3667200,3652310,3637410,3608350,3590190,3576960,3559580,3542320,3524100,3505930,3484280,3458880,3431110,3412100,3397810,3386160,3373250,3365790,3358790,3352370,3347800,3341910,3336900,3330690,3322800,3315850,3308310,3298550,3290120,3279650,3268050,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Muskegon, Michigan"
array_2_name = "Remaining Forest Cover in the Brazilian Amazon"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 3215 · Black Variable ID: 20936 · Red Variable ID: 372
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0