about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,135 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and the second variable is The number of sonographers in Wisconsin.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the engineering expertise grew, so did their ability to finely tune and calibrate ultrasound equipment, leading to a sonographic renaissance in the dairy state. Those engineers' precision and attention to detail really resonated with the dairy industry, and soon the sound of udderly efficient sonography filled the air.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: A minimalist depiction of this scene could involve creating an image that uses clean lines and bold colors to represent the bustling university classroom in Wisconsin. The focus would be on the group of engineers learning about ultrasound technology, with the skilled instructor demonstrating the advancements in sonography. The image could convey the sense of excitement and potential by showing the students' engaged expressions and the instructor's confident demonstration. Additionally, a separate minimalist visualization could illustrate hospitals and clinics bustling with the growing number of sonographers, representing the impact of the engineers' new potential in healthcare. The simplicity and clarity of the visuals would capture the scene's essence while leaving room for the viewer's imagination to fill in the details. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and The number of sonographers in Wisconsin. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image Minimalism Cute 2D animation Oragami Glitch art
ChatGPT: Minimalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and The number of sonographers in Wisconsin, in the following situation: Because Master's in engineering required courses on ultrasound tech, more engineers became sonographers, leading to a surge in Wisconsin's sonographer population.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling university classroom in Wisconsin, graduate students are proudly receiving their Master's degrees in Engineering. Among them, a group of engineers is enthusiastically learning about ultrasound technology, while a skilled instructor demonstrates the latest advancements in sonography. The room is filled with excitement as the engineers realize their new potential in healthcare. Meanwhile, across the state, hospitals and clinics are bustling with the growing number of sonographers, many of whom were once engineering students turned skilled sonographers.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Minimalism ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling university classroom in Wisconsin, graduate students are proudly receiving their Master's degrees in Engineering. Among them, a group of engineers is enthusiastically learning about ultrasound technology, while a skilled instructor demonstrates the latest advancements in sonography. The room is filled with excitement as the engineers realize their new potential in healthcare. Meanwhile, across the state, hospitals and clinics are bustling with the growing number of sonographers, many of whom were once engineering students turned skilled sonographers. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: A minimalist depiction of this scene could involve creating an image that uses clean lines and bold colors to represent the bustling university classroom in Wisconsin. The focus would be on the group of engineers learning about ultrasound technology, with the skilled instructor demonstrating the advancements in sonography. The image could convey the sense of excitement and potential by showing the students' engaged expressions and the instructor's confident demonstration. Additionally, a separate minimalist visualization could illustrate hospitals and clinics bustling with the growing number of sonographers, representing the impact of the engineers' new potential in healthcare. The simplicity and clarity of the visuals would capture the scene's essence while leaving room for the viewer's imagination to fill in the details.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Master's degrees awarded in Engineering caused The number of sonographers in Wisconsin to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Engineering Education's Effect on Echogenic Examiners: Exploring the Engineering Master's Degree and Sonographer Supply in Wisconsin

The International Journal of Echogenic Engineering

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and The number of sonographers in Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9695186 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Engineering Education's Effect on Echogenic Examiners: Exploring the Engineering Master's Degree and Sonographer Supply in Wisconsin

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and the quantity of sonographers in the state of Wisconsin. Through a ten-year analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have uncovered an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9695186 with a p-value less than 0.01. The evidence suggests that as the number of Engineering Master's degrees awarded increases, the number of sonographers in Wisconsin also rises. Perhaps this unexpected connection can be attributed to the dynamic nature of sound waves in both engineering and sonography – after all, a good joke is all about the delivery, isn't it? This correlation opens up a new avenue for research into the interconnected world of academic disciplines and career choices. So next time you find yourself pondering the relationship between seemingly unrelated fields, just remember that sometimes the most surprising connections are the ones that make the most noise.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and The number of sonographers in Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Engineering Education's Effect on Echogenic Examiners: Exploring the Engineering Master's Degree and Sonographer Supply in Wisconsin

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and the quantity of sonographers in the state of Wisconsin. Through a ten-year analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have uncovered an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9695186 with a p-value less than 0.01. The evidence suggests that as the number of Engineering Master's degrees awarded increases, the number of sonographers in Wisconsin also rises. Perhaps this unexpected connection can be attributed to the dynamic nature of sound waves in both engineering and sonography – after all, a good joke is all about the delivery, isn't it? This correlation opens up a new avenue for research into the interconnected world of academic disciplines and career choices. So next time you find yourself pondering the relationship between seemingly unrelated fields, just remember that sometimes the most surprising connections are the ones that make the most noise.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ah, the world of academic research - where data meets discovery, and correlations are as sought after as the elusive Higgs boson. In this paper, we delve into the curious case of how a Master's degree in Engineering might influence the burgeoning population of sonographers in the cheese-loving state of Wisconsin. While it may sound like the setup to a punchline at a science convention, our findings paint a picture worth more than a thousand words – and in our case, perhaps also a few ultrasound waves.

The connection between Engineering Master's degrees and the supply of sonographers may seem more far-fetched than the plot of a low-budget sci-fi movie, but we assure you, the data doesn't lie - unless, of course, it's caught up in a statistical paradox. Our investigation harnesses the power of numbers and charts to uncover what seems to be a puzzling association between these seemingly divergent fields. It's like trying to find the common ground between quarks and quasars – you might not expect them to be related, but as the data suggests, they somehow are.

The essence of research is in uncovering the unexpected – it's like stumbling upon a hidden treasure chest while looking for lost car keys. And in our case, the treasure we've unearthed is as surprising as finding a yeti in a freezer. The statistical analysis of the relationship between these variables yielded a correlation coefficient that's so strong, it's practically braided - 0.9695186, to be exact. And with a p-value that can practically fit on the head of a pin, we find ourselves in a situation more remarkable than an egg balancing on its tip.

So, what prompts such an unlikely correlation between Engineering Master's degrees and the supply of sonographers? Is it the resonant frequencies of engineering jargon and ultrasound waves, or is there a deeper, more enigmatic force at play? As we journey into the heart of this unexpected relationship, we invite you to join us in unraveling this scientific enigma. After all, the most delightful surprises often come from the unlikeliest of pairings, much like discovering a robot and a kitten becoming the best of friends. So, buckle up and get ready for an investigation that proves that sometimes in science, the best discoveries are the ones that take us by surprise.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and The number of sonographers in Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Engineering Education's Effect on Echogenic Examiners: Exploring the Engineering Master's Degree and Sonographer Supply in Wisconsin

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and the quantity of sonographers in the state of Wisconsin. Through a ten-year analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have uncovered an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9695186 with a p-value less than 0.01. The evidence suggests that as the number of Engineering Master's degrees awarded increases, the number of sonographers in Wisconsin also rises. Perhaps this unexpected connection can be attributed to the dynamic nature of sound waves in both engineering and sonography – after all, a good joke is all about the delivery, isn't it? This correlation opens up a new avenue for research into the interconnected world of academic disciplines and career choices. So next time you find yourself pondering the relationship between seemingly unrelated fields, just remember that sometimes the most surprising connections are the ones that make the most noise.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the world of academic research - where data meets discovery, and correlations are as sought after as the elusive Higgs boson. In this paper, we delve into the curious case of how a Master's degree in Engineering might influence the burgeoning population of sonographers in the cheese-loving state of Wisconsin. While it may sound like the setup to a punchline at a science convention, our findings paint a picture worth more than a thousand words – and in our case, perhaps also a few ultrasound waves.
The connection between Engineering Master's degrees and the supply of sonographers may seem more far-fetched than the plot of a low-budget sci-fi movie, but we assure you, the data doesn't lie - unless, of course, it's caught up in a statistical paradox. Our investigation harnesses the power of numbers and charts to uncover what seems to be a puzzling association between these seemingly divergent fields. It's like trying to find the common ground between quarks and quasars – you might not expect them to be related, but as the data suggests, they somehow are.
The essence of research is in uncovering the unexpected – it's like stumbling upon a hidden treasure chest while looking for lost car keys. And in our case, the treasure we've unearthed is as surprising as finding a yeti in a freezer. The statistical analysis of the relationship between these variables yielded a correlation coefficient that's so strong, it's practically braided - 0.9695186, to be exact. And with a p-value that can practically fit on the head of a pin, we find ourselves in a situation more remarkable than an egg balancing on its tip.
So, what prompts such an unlikely correlation between Engineering Master's degrees and the supply of sonographers? Is it the resonant frequencies of engineering jargon and ultrasound waves, or is there a deeper, more enigmatic force at play? As we journey into the heart of this unexpected relationship, we invite you to join us in unraveling this scientific enigma. After all, the most delightful surprises often come from the unlikeliest of pairings, much like discovering a robot and a kitten becoming the best of friends. So, buckle up and get ready for an investigation that proves that sometimes in science, the best discoveries are the ones that take us by surprise.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we delve into the surprisingly interconnected realms of engineering education and sonography supply, we find precedent in the works of Smith, Doe, and Jones. In "The Influence of Graduate Education on Allied Health Professions," Smith et al. explore the potential effects of advanced degrees in engineering on the healthcare workforce, opening a door to considering the impact on sonographer numbers as well. In a similar vein, Doe's "Engineering Education and Labor Market Outcomes" delves into the far-reaching consequences of engineering education, providing valuable insights for our investigation. Furthermore, Jones' seminal work, "The Link Between Academic Disciplines and Professional Paths," offers a framework for understanding the unexpected correlations between seemingly disparate fields, laying a foundation for our exploration.

Adding a fictional twist, the insights from Dostoevsky's "The Brothers Karamazov" provide an intriguing parallel to the elusive connection we seek. Indeed, the complex interplay of characters in the novel mirrors the intricate relationship between the field of engineering and the practice of sonography. And who could forget the timeless wisdom of "Winnie-the-Pooh" by A.A. Milne, which, while not directly related to our topic, has an undeniable charm that resonates with our study's unexpected discoveries.

Drawing inspiration from unlikely sources, our research has even ventured into the realms of cartoons and children's shows. Through the lens of "SpongeBob SquarePants," we ponder the significance of underwater acoustics in the world of engineering and its potential influence on the sonographic landscape. Additionally, the enigmatic nature of "Scooby-Doo" prompts contemplation of the mysterious forces at play in the correlation between these divergent fields.

In the pursuit of scientific inquiry, it is crucial to consider all avenues of inspiration, no matter how unconventional they may seem. After all, in the grand tapestry of knowledge, the most unexpected threads often weave the most fascinating patterns. And who would have thought that the world of academia could be illuminated by the whimsy of children's literature and animated adventures? But as our findings have revealed, sometimes the most peculiar associations can hold the key to unlocking profound insights – much like finding a treasure map in a batch of freshly baked cookies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and The number of sonographers in Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Engineering Education's Effect on Echogenic Examiners: Exploring the Engineering Master's Degree and Sonographer Supply in Wisconsin

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and the quantity of sonographers in the state of Wisconsin. Through a ten-year analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have uncovered an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9695186 with a p-value less than 0.01. The evidence suggests that as the number of Engineering Master's degrees awarded increases, the number of sonographers in Wisconsin also rises. Perhaps this unexpected connection can be attributed to the dynamic nature of sound waves in both engineering and sonography – after all, a good joke is all about the delivery, isn't it? This correlation opens up a new avenue for research into the interconnected world of academic disciplines and career choices. So next time you find yourself pondering the relationship between seemingly unrelated fields, just remember that sometimes the most surprising connections are the ones that make the most noise.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the world of academic research - where data meets discovery, and correlations are as sought after as the elusive Higgs boson. In this paper, we delve into the curious case of how a Master's degree in Engineering might influence the burgeoning population of sonographers in the cheese-loving state of Wisconsin. While it may sound like the setup to a punchline at a science convention, our findings paint a picture worth more than a thousand words – and in our case, perhaps also a few ultrasound waves.
The connection between Engineering Master's degrees and the supply of sonographers may seem more far-fetched than the plot of a low-budget sci-fi movie, but we assure you, the data doesn't lie - unless, of course, it's caught up in a statistical paradox. Our investigation harnesses the power of numbers and charts to uncover what seems to be a puzzling association between these seemingly divergent fields. It's like trying to find the common ground between quarks and quasars – you might not expect them to be related, but as the data suggests, they somehow are.
The essence of research is in uncovering the unexpected – it's like stumbling upon a hidden treasure chest while looking for lost car keys. And in our case, the treasure we've unearthed is as surprising as finding a yeti in a freezer. The statistical analysis of the relationship between these variables yielded a correlation coefficient that's so strong, it's practically braided - 0.9695186, to be exact. And with a p-value that can practically fit on the head of a pin, we find ourselves in a situation more remarkable than an egg balancing on its tip.
So, what prompts such an unlikely correlation between Engineering Master's degrees and the supply of sonographers? Is it the resonant frequencies of engineering jargon and ultrasound waves, or is there a deeper, more enigmatic force at play? As we journey into the heart of this unexpected relationship, we invite you to join us in unraveling this scientific enigma. After all, the most delightful surprises often come from the unlikeliest of pairings, much like discovering a robot and a kitten becoming the best of friends. So, buckle up and get ready for an investigation that proves that sometimes in science, the best discoveries are the ones that take us by surprise.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the mysterious link between Engineering Master's degrees and the sonographer population in Wisconsin, our research team embarked on a journey that was as intricate as untangling an over-enthusiastic knot. We gathered data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, utilizing their treasure trove of information spanning the years 2012 to 2021. Our data collection process involved more clicking and downloading than a binge-watching session on a rainy day.

To begin our exploration, we engaged in a unique form of statistical spelunking, diving deep into the abyss of data points and variables with the fervor of an explorer in search of lost relics. After excavating the relevant data, we engaged in an exercise that resembled coaxing shy numbers out of their shells, comparing and contrasting them with the agility of an acrobat walking a statistical tightrope.

Employing the solemn art of statistical analysis, we calculated the correlation coefficient between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and the quantity of sonographers in Wisconsin. Like skilled illusionists, we manipulated the data with the precision of a magician crafting a masterful trick, only in our case, the rabbit we pulled out of our statistical hat was a breathtaking correlation coefficient of 0.9695186. This correlation was so robust that it practically did a victory lap around the realm of statistical significance, flaunting a p-value lower than the spirits of researchers facing a mountain of unanalyzed data.

In our approach to this investigation, we applied rigorous regression analysis, equation wrangling, and variable teasing to uncover the unexpected relationship between these seemingly disparate fields. Our methodology was more intricate than solving a Rubik's Cube blindfolded, but with each twist and turn, we became ever closer to unraveling the enigmatic connection between Engineering Master's degrees and the sonographer supply in Wisconsin.

Additionally, we evaluated the data by time series analysis, delving into the temporal patterns of the variables with all the enthusiasm of a time traveler exploring epochs of statistical significance. In doing so, we aimed to capture the dynamic evolution of the relationship over the span of our data, much like a botanist studying the growth of intriguingly interconnected scientific phenomena.

Finally, a causal inference analysis was conducted to unlock the elusive secrets behind the observed correlation. We delved into the intricate web of causal pathways, tiptoeing around potential confounding factors with the agility of a secret agent evading detection, ultimately uncovering insights more astonishing than finding a treasure map in a library book.

After diligently sifting through heaps of data, navigating statistical intricacies, and unraveling mysteries akin to deciphering an ancient code, our findings shed new light on the unconventional correspondence between Engineering Master's degrees and the sonographer population in Wisconsin. So, dear reader, as we present our results, remember that sometimes the most unexpected connections are the ones that resonate the loudest – much like the harmonious hum of scientific discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and The number of sonographers in Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9695186, r-squared of 0.9399663, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Engineering Education's Effect on Echogenic Examiners: Exploring the Engineering Master's Degree and Sonographer Supply in Wisconsin

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and the quantity of sonographers in the state of Wisconsin. Through a ten-year analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have uncovered an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9695186 with a p-value less than 0.01. The evidence suggests that as the number of Engineering Master's degrees awarded increases, the number of sonographers in Wisconsin also rises. Perhaps this unexpected connection can be attributed to the dynamic nature of sound waves in both engineering and sonography – after all, a good joke is all about the delivery, isn't it? This correlation opens up a new avenue for research into the interconnected world of academic disciplines and career choices. So next time you find yourself pondering the relationship between seemingly unrelated fields, just remember that sometimes the most surprising connections are the ones that make the most noise.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the world of academic research - where data meets discovery, and correlations are as sought after as the elusive Higgs boson. In this paper, we delve into the curious case of how a Master's degree in Engineering might influence the burgeoning population of sonographers in the cheese-loving state of Wisconsin. While it may sound like the setup to a punchline at a science convention, our findings paint a picture worth more than a thousand words – and in our case, perhaps also a few ultrasound waves.
The connection between Engineering Master's degrees and the supply of sonographers may seem more far-fetched than the plot of a low-budget sci-fi movie, but we assure you, the data doesn't lie - unless, of course, it's caught up in a statistical paradox. Our investigation harnesses the power of numbers and charts to uncover what seems to be a puzzling association between these seemingly divergent fields. It's like trying to find the common ground between quarks and quasars – you might not expect them to be related, but as the data suggests, they somehow are.
The essence of research is in uncovering the unexpected – it's like stumbling upon a hidden treasure chest while looking for lost car keys. And in our case, the treasure we've unearthed is as surprising as finding a yeti in a freezer. The statistical analysis of the relationship between these variables yielded a correlation coefficient that's so strong, it's practically braided - 0.9695186, to be exact. And with a p-value that can practically fit on the head of a pin, we find ourselves in a situation more remarkable than an egg balancing on its tip.
So, what prompts such an unlikely correlation between Engineering Master's degrees and the supply of sonographers? Is it the resonant frequencies of engineering jargon and ultrasound waves, or is there a deeper, more enigmatic force at play? As we journey into the heart of this unexpected relationship, we invite you to join us in unraveling this scientific enigma. After all, the most delightful surprises often come from the unlikeliest of pairings, much like discovering a robot and a kitten becoming the best of friends. So, buckle up and get ready for an investigation that proves that sometimes in science, the best discoveries are the ones that take us by surprise.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and the quantity of sonographers in Wisconsin has left us both scratching our heads and tapping our feet to an unexpected rhythm. The correlation coefficient of 0.9695186 we uncovered seems more fitting for a synchronized swimming routine than for an academic research paper – but as they say, the data speaks for itself, even if it's in a surprising tongue.

The scatterplot in Figure 1 practically jumps off the paper, showcasing the strong positive correlation between the two variables. The points on the plot are so neatly aligned, it's as if the numbers themselves are doing a choreographed dance. Really, it's like witnessing the scientific equivalent of a perfect duet – a statistical tango, if you will.

With an r-squared value of 0.9399663, we can confidently say that almost 94% of the variation in the number of sonographers in Wisconsin can be explained by the number of Master's degrees in Engineering – a connection that's more compelling than a detective novel's plot twist. And let's not forget about that elusive p-value, which turned out to be less than 0.01 – making it rarer than a unicorn sighting in a field of statistical analyses.

The question that looms large in the wake of these findings is: what might be the underlying cause of this unexpected correlation? Is it the unforeseen resonance of engineering knowledge and sonographic skills, or perhaps a statistical fluke that has us scratching our heads in bewilderment? It's like trying to solve a Sudoku puzzle only to find out that the numbers have a hidden message in Morse code.

These results open up a Pandora's box of further inquiries into the interconnected web of academic disciplines and professional pathways. The implications of this study not only challenge traditional academic boundaries but also urge us to reevaluate our preconceived notions about career trajectories. It's like stumbling upon a parallel universe where seemingly disparate elements blend into a harmonious whole, much like discovering that peanut butter and jelly make for an unexpectedly perfect combination.

In conclusion, our investigation into the relationship between Master's degrees in Engineering and the supply of sonographers in Wisconsin has shed light on a correlation that's as captivating as it is mystifying. As we make our way through this labyrinth of data, it's undeniable that sometimes in the vast landscape of research, the most unexpected connections can yield the most remarkable insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and The number of sonographers in Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Engineering Education's Effect on Echogenic Examiners: Exploring the Engineering Master's Degree and Sonographer Supply in Wisconsin

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and the quantity of sonographers in the state of Wisconsin. Through a ten-year analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have uncovered an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9695186 with a p-value less than 0.01. The evidence suggests that as the number of Engineering Master's degrees awarded increases, the number of sonographers in Wisconsin also rises. Perhaps this unexpected connection can be attributed to the dynamic nature of sound waves in both engineering and sonography – after all, a good joke is all about the delivery, isn't it? This correlation opens up a new avenue for research into the interconnected world of academic disciplines and career choices. So next time you find yourself pondering the relationship between seemingly unrelated fields, just remember that sometimes the most surprising connections are the ones that make the most noise.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we delve into the surprisingly interconnected realms of engineering education and sonography supply, we find precedent in the works of Smith, Doe, and Jones. In "The Influence of Graduate Education on Allied Health Professions," Smith et al. explore the potential effects of advanced degrees in engineering on the healthcare workforce, opening a door to considering the impact on sonographer numbers as well. In a similar vein, Doe's "Engineering Education and Labor Market Outcomes" delves into the far-reaching consequences of engineering education, providing valuable insights for our investigation. Furthermore, Jones' seminal work, "The Link Between Academic Disciplines and Professional Paths," offers a framework for understanding the unexpected correlations between seemingly disparate fields, laying a foundation for our exploration.
Adding a fictional twist, the insights from Dostoevsky's "The Brothers Karamazov" provide an intriguing parallel to the elusive connection we seek. Indeed, the complex interplay of characters in the novel mirrors the intricate relationship between the field of engineering and the practice of sonography. And who could forget the timeless wisdom of "Winnie-the-Pooh" by A.A. Milne, which, while not directly related to our topic, has an undeniable charm that resonates with our study's unexpected discoveries.
Drawing inspiration from unlikely sources, our research has even ventured into the realms of cartoons and children's shows. Through the lens of "SpongeBob SquarePants," we ponder the significance of underwater acoustics in the world of engineering and its potential influence on the sonographic landscape. Additionally, the enigmatic nature of "Scooby-Doo" prompts contemplation of the mysterious forces at play in the correlation between these divergent fields.
In the pursuit of scientific inquiry, it is crucial to consider all avenues of inspiration, no matter how unconventional they may seem. After all, in the grand tapestry of knowledge, the most unexpected threads often weave the most fascinating patterns. And who would have thought that the world of academia could be illuminated by the whimsy of children's literature and animated adventures? But as our findings have revealed, sometimes the most peculiar associations can hold the key to unlocking profound insights – much like finding a treasure map in a batch of freshly baked cookies.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and the quantity of sonographers in Wisconsin has left us both scratching our heads and tapping our feet to an unexpected rhythm. The correlation coefficient of 0.9695186 we uncovered seems more fitting for a synchronized swimming routine than for an academic research paper – but as they say, the data speaks for itself, even if it's in a surprising tongue.
The scatterplot in Figure 1 practically jumps off the paper, showcasing the strong positive correlation between the two variables. The points on the plot are so neatly aligned, it's as if the numbers themselves are doing a choreographed dance. Really, it's like witnessing the scientific equivalent of a perfect duet – a statistical tango, if you will.
With an r-squared value of 0.9399663, we can confidently say that almost 94% of the variation in the number of sonographers in Wisconsin can be explained by the number of Master's degrees in Engineering – a connection that's more compelling than a detective novel's plot twist. And let's not forget about that elusive p-value, which turned out to be less than 0.01 – making it rarer than a unicorn sighting in a field of statistical analyses.
The question that looms large in the wake of these findings is: what might be the underlying cause of this unexpected correlation? Is it the unforeseen resonance of engineering knowledge and sonographic skills, or perhaps a statistical fluke that has us scratching our heads in bewilderment? It's like trying to solve a Sudoku puzzle only to find out that the numbers have a hidden message in Morse code.
These results open up a Pandora's box of further inquiries into the interconnected web of academic disciplines and professional pathways. The implications of this study not only challenge traditional academic boundaries but also urge us to reevaluate our preconceived notions about career trajectories. It's like stumbling upon a parallel universe where seemingly disparate elements blend into a harmonious whole, much like discovering that peanut butter and jelly make for an unexpectedly perfect combination.
In conclusion, our investigation into the relationship between Master's degrees in Engineering and the supply of sonographers in Wisconsin has shed light on a correlation that's as captivating as it is mystifying. As we make our way through this labyrinth of data, it's undeniable that sometimes in the vast landscape of research, the most unexpected connections can yield the most remarkable insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The prodigious correlation we uncovered between the number of Master's degrees in Engineering and the quantity of sonographers in Wisconsin has left us marveling at the unexpected symphony of data. Our findings not only support previous research, but they also evoke a sense of wonder akin to stumbling upon a scientific secret encoded in the binary system.

Drawing from the literature review, the insights from Dostoevsky's "The Brothers Karamazov" have cunningly paralleled the intricate relationship between engineering and sonography. Though the connection may seem as elusive as deciphering a cryptic crossword, our results fortify the notion that the influence of engineering education extends far beyond traditional engineering professions—it's like finding a treasure chest hidden in the attic of an old Victorian mansion.

Speaking of unexpected discoveries, the whimsy of "Winnie-the-Pooh" endures as a metaphor for the surprising correlations we've unearthed in our exploration. Just as Pooh and his friends stumble upon unforeseen adventures, our study has unraveled an unanticipated connection between academic disciplines and professional pathways. It's akin to finding a rare Pokémon in a sea of otherwise common statistical patterns.

At the heart of our findings lies the question of causality—the enigma of whether increased engineering expertise resonates with the skilled artistry of sonography or if unseen forces are at play, akin to a Quidditch match between variables and unknown covariates. This unexpected correlation challenges the conventional wisdom of academic specialization and echoes the sentiments of an unexpected plot twist in a scientific whodunit.

As we journey through the labyrinth of interconnected disciplines, the implications of our study beckon further exploration, much like embarking on a scientific quest in uncharted territories. It's as if we've stumbled upon a hidden room in the halls of academia, where disparate fields intertwine into a harmonious blend not unlike the fusion of elements in an alchemical concoction.

In summary, our examination of the liaison between Engineering Master's degrees and the supply of sonographers in Wisconsin serves as a testament to the maxim that sometimes the most unexpected connections yield profound revelations. In the grand tapestry of knowledge, it's these unforeseen threads that weave the most captivating patterns, much like finding the missing puzzle piece to a statistical riddle.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and The number of sonographers in Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Engineering Education's Effect on Echogenic Examiners: Exploring the Engineering Master's Degree and Sonographer Supply in Wisconsin

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and the quantity of sonographers in the state of Wisconsin. Through a ten-year analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have uncovered an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9695186 with a p-value less than 0.01. The evidence suggests that as the number of Engineering Master's degrees awarded increases, the number of sonographers in Wisconsin also rises. Perhaps this unexpected connection can be attributed to the dynamic nature of sound waves in both engineering and sonography – after all, a good joke is all about the delivery, isn't it? This correlation opens up a new avenue for research into the interconnected world of academic disciplines and career choices. So next time you find yourself pondering the relationship between seemingly unrelated fields, just remember that sometimes the most surprising connections are the ones that make the most noise.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the world of academic research - where data meets discovery, and correlations are as sought after as the elusive Higgs boson. In this paper, we delve into the curious case of how a Master's degree in Engineering might influence the burgeoning population of sonographers in the cheese-loving state of Wisconsin. While it may sound like the setup to a punchline at a science convention, our findings paint a picture worth more than a thousand words – and in our case, perhaps also a few ultrasound waves.
The connection between Engineering Master's degrees and the supply of sonographers may seem more far-fetched than the plot of a low-budget sci-fi movie, but we assure you, the data doesn't lie - unless, of course, it's caught up in a statistical paradox. Our investigation harnesses the power of numbers and charts to uncover what seems to be a puzzling association between these seemingly divergent fields. It's like trying to find the common ground between quarks and quasars – you might not expect them to be related, but as the data suggests, they somehow are.
The essence of research is in uncovering the unexpected – it's like stumbling upon a hidden treasure chest while looking for lost car keys. And in our case, the treasure we've unearthed is as surprising as finding a yeti in a freezer. The statistical analysis of the relationship between these variables yielded a correlation coefficient that's so strong, it's practically braided - 0.9695186, to be exact. And with a p-value that can practically fit on the head of a pin, we find ourselves in a situation more remarkable than an egg balancing on its tip.
So, what prompts such an unlikely correlation between Engineering Master's degrees and the supply of sonographers? Is it the resonant frequencies of engineering jargon and ultrasound waves, or is there a deeper, more enigmatic force at play? As we journey into the heart of this unexpected relationship, we invite you to join us in unraveling this scientific enigma. After all, the most delightful surprises often come from the unlikeliest of pairings, much like discovering a robot and a kitten becoming the best of friends. So, buckle up and get ready for an investigation that proves that sometimes in science, the best discoveries are the ones that take us by surprise.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and the quantity of sonographers in Wisconsin has left us both scratching our heads and tapping our feet to an unexpected rhythm. The correlation coefficient of 0.9695186 we uncovered seems more fitting for a synchronized swimming routine than for an academic research paper – but as they say, the data speaks for itself, even if it's in a surprising tongue.
The scatterplot in Figure 1 practically jumps off the paper, showcasing the strong positive correlation between the two variables. The points on the plot are so neatly aligned, it's as if the numbers themselves are doing a choreographed dance. Really, it's like witnessing the scientific equivalent of a perfect duet – a statistical tango, if you will.
With an r-squared value of 0.9399663, we can confidently say that almost 94% of the variation in the number of sonographers in Wisconsin can be explained by the number of Master's degrees in Engineering – a connection that's more compelling than a detective novel's plot twist. And let's not forget about that elusive p-value, which turned out to be less than 0.01 – making it rarer than a unicorn sighting in a field of statistical analyses.
The question that looms large in the wake of these findings is: what might be the underlying cause of this unexpected correlation? Is it the unforeseen resonance of engineering knowledge and sonographic skills, or perhaps a statistical fluke that has us scratching our heads in bewilderment? It's like trying to solve a Sudoku puzzle only to find out that the numbers have a hidden message in Morse code.
These results open up a Pandora's box of further inquiries into the interconnected web of academic disciplines and professional pathways. The implications of this study not only challenge traditional academic boundaries but also urge us to reevaluate our preconceived notions about career trajectories. It's like stumbling upon a parallel universe where seemingly disparate elements blend into a harmonious whole, much like discovering that peanut butter and jelly make for an unexpectedly perfect combination.
In conclusion, our investigation into the relationship between Master's degrees in Engineering and the supply of sonographers in Wisconsin has shed light on a correlation that's as captivating as it is mystifying. As we make our way through this labyrinth of data, it's undeniable that sometimes in the vast landscape of research, the most unexpected connections can yield the most remarkable insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

Now, as we wrap up this whirlwind exploration of the interconnected realms of Engineering Master's degrees and the sonographer population in Wisconsin, we find ourselves in a conundrum worthy of a scientific magic show. Like a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat, the data has revealed a correlation coefficient that's so high, it's practically sending us echos. It's as if the sound waves of statistical significance have orchestrated a symphony that not even Beethoven could have fathomed. Our findings have brought us to the precipice of a scientific revelation that's more awe-inspiring than witnessing a solar eclipse in the middle of winter.

In light of our results, it's clear that this unexpected correlation between these variables is as notable as discovering a penguin in the desert – peculiar, but undeniably intriguing. The implications of this study transcend traditional academic boundaries, urging us to reconsider the very fabric of interconnected disciplines and professional pathways.

But fear not, fellow researchers, for our work here is done. It's time to bid adieu to this particular avenue of inquiry, as we confidently declare that further investigations into the relationship between Engineering Master's degrees and the sonographer supply in Wisconsin are as unnecessary as a third nostril. So let's raise our test tubes to the joyous dance of discovery, and may our future research endeavors be as illuminating as a glow-in-the-dark firefly in the night sky.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Engineering Education's Effect on Echogenic Examiners: Exploring the Engineering Master's Degree and Sonographer Supply in Wisconsin. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Echogenic Engineering


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Engineering Education's Effect on Echogenic Examiners: Exploring the Engineering Master's Degree and Sonographer Supply in Wisconsin. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Engineering and Medical Imaging Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Engineering Education's Effect on Echogenic Examiners: Exploring the Engineering Master's Degree and Sonographer Supply in Wisconsin with an abstract of This study investigates the link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Engineering and the quantity of sonographers in the state of Wisconsin. Through a ten-year analysis of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have uncovered an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9695186 with a p-value less than 0.01. The evidence suggests that as the number of Engineering Master's degrees awarded increases, the number of sonographers in Wisconsin also rises. Perhaps this unexpected connection can be attributed to the dynamic nature of sound waves in both engineering and sonography – after all, a good joke is all about the delivery, isn't it? This correlation opens up a new avenue for research into the interconnected world of academic disciplines and career choices. So next time you find yourself pondering the relationship between seemingly unrelated fields, just remember that sometimes the most surprising connections are the ones that make the most noise.

ChatGPT:

Engineering education, echogenic examiners, engineering master's degree, sonographer supply, Wisconsin, correlation coefficient, National Center for Education Statistics, Bureau of Labor Statistics, sound waves, academic disciplines, career choices, interdisciplinary research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Master's degrees awarded in Engineering
Detailed data title: Master's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions in Engineering
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Master's degrees awarded in Engineering

The number of sonographers in Wisconsin
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of diagnostic medical sonographers in Wisconsin
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of sonographers in Wisconsin

Correlation r = 0.9695186 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9399663 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of sonographers in Wisconsin) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Master's degrees awarded in Engineering) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.6E-6. 0.0000036403460736068566000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.00036% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 274,699 random variables You don't actually need 274 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.87, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Master's degrees awarded in Engineering (Degrees awarded)40323404204237646117516465282651723497014727747257
The number of sonographers in Wisconsin (Laborers)1000103010901320154016101540144014801450




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([40323,40420,42376,46117,51646,52826,51723,49701,47277,47257,])
array_2 = np.array([1000,1030,1090,1320,1540,1610,1540,1440,1480,1450,])
array_1_name = "Master's degrees awarded in Engineering"
array_2_name = "The number of sonographers in Wisconsin"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 3135 · Black Variable ID: 1320 · Red Variable ID: 16233
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0