about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,095 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Butter consumption and the second variable is Quanta Services' stock price (PWR).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As butter consumption rose, so did the demand for toast. This led to an increase in the sales of toasters. The surge in toaster sales necessitated more electrical infrastructure to power all these new appliances. As a result, Quanta Services, a leading provider of electrical infrastructure services, experienced a significant uptick in business, causing their stock price to rise. It's a buttery, toast-driven chain reaction that has investors spreading PWR throughout the market!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic state fair where people are enjoying delicious, buttery corn cobs and popcorn while admiring intricate butter sculptures. In the background, show the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR) steadily rising as they gain recognition for their expertise in large-scale food art installations. The scene should embody a high-tech aesthetic, with sleek and modern visual elements that convey the advanced nature of the state fair and the technological advancements in food artistry. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Butter consumption and Quanta Services' stock price (PWR). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Glitch art Realistic A scene from Skyrim High-tech Oragami
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Butter consumption and Quanta Services' stock price (PWR), in the following situation: Because as butter consumption increased, so did the demand for butter sculptures at state fairs, boosting Quanta Services' stock as they specialize in large-scale food art installations.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling state fair, people are indulging in buttery, freshly-baked corn cobs and popcorn. As they munch on these treats, they admire the intricate butter sculptures on display, marveling at the amazing detail and precision. In the background, the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR) is shown steadily rising as their expertise in large-scale food art installations becomes increasingly sought after.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling state fair, people are indulging in buttery, freshly-baked corn cobs and popcorn. As they munch on these treats, they admire the intricate butter sculptures on display, marveling at the amazing detail and precision. In the background, the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR) is shown steadily rising as their expertise in large-scale food art installations becomes increasingly sought after. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a futuristic state fair where people are enjoying delicious, buttery corn cobs and popcorn while admiring intricate butter sculptures. In the background, show the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR) steadily rising as they gain recognition for their expertise in large-scale food art installations. The scene should embody a high-tech aesthetic, with sleek and modern visual elements that convey the advanced nature of the state fair and the technological advancements in food artistry.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Butter consumption caused Quanta Services' stock price (PWR) to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Spreading the Wealth: Unveiling the Butter-PWR Connection

The Journal of Dairy Dynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Quanta Services' stock price (PWR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8474648 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Wealth: Unveiling the Butter-PWR Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the seemingly inexplicable relationship between butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). While one might be tempted to dismiss the idea of any correlation as mere conspiracy churn-theories, our rigorous analysis using USDA butter consumption data paired with LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) stock price data casts new light on the buttery, yet financially potent, topic. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong positive correlation, with a coefficient of 0.8474648 and p-value of less than 0.01 over the time period from 2002 to 2021.

Through this study, we aim to butter up the financial world with insights that may initially seem hard to swallow. Our results not only showcase the pecan-tly butter-PWR relationship, but also highlight the significance of considering unex-peck-ted factors in market analysis. This research, while lighthearted in its presentation, brings to the forefront the potential dairy-lectable market influences that may have been overlooked. So, grab some popcorn and a tub of butter as we dive into the slippery, yet intriguing, world of butter-fueled stock price movement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Quanta Services' stock price (PWR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Wealth: Unveiling the Butter-PWR Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the seemingly inexplicable relationship between butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). While one might be tempted to dismiss the idea of any correlation as mere conspiracy churn-theories, our rigorous analysis using USDA butter consumption data paired with LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) stock price data casts new light on the buttery, yet financially potent, topic. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong positive correlation, with a coefficient of 0.8474648 and p-value of less than 0.01 over the time period from 2002 to 2021.

Through this study, we aim to butter up the financial world with insights that may initially seem hard to swallow. Our results not only showcase the pecan-tly butter-PWR relationship, but also highlight the significance of considering unex-peck-ted factors in market analysis. This research, while lighthearted in its presentation, brings to the forefront the potential dairy-lectable market influences that may have been overlooked. So, grab some popcorn and a tub of butter as we dive into the slippery, yet intriguing, world of butter-fueled stock price movement.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of financial markets is often characterized by complexity and unpredictability. As researchers, it is our duty to peel back the layers of obscurity and shed light on the perplexing connections that underlie stock price movements. In this pursuit, we have stumbled upon an unlikely pair - butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). While the initial reaction to such an association may be one of incredulity, it is precisely the improbable nature of this correlation that piqued our interest.

Historically, the financial sector has been notoriously averse to incorporating dairy products into its economic models. However, as we confront the bewildering dance between butter and PWR stock prices, it becomes increasingly clear that the creamy texture of financial analysis can be enhanced by a dash of culinary curiosity. While some may view this endeavor as trivial or mere lipids of imagination, we contend that exploring unorthodox relationships holds the potential to churn out truly enlightening insights.

Our study, featuring a thorough analysis of USDA butter consumption data and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) stock price data, seeks to bring clarity to this enigmatic rapport. We endeavor to peel away the layers of doubt and uncover the buttery truth that seems to linger beneath the surface of stock price volatilities. In doing so, we hope to savor the flavor of unanticipated market dynamics and perhaps even generate a few laughs along the whey.

It is our firm belief that this investigation into the butter-PWR nexus will not only enrich the financial research landscape but also add a sprinkle of whimsy to the otherwise austere realm of market analysis. After all, as we delve into the interplay of creamy indulgence and stock market performance, we might just discover that the not-so-hidden costs of butter are more than mere expenses – they may be key ingredients in the recipe for understanding market behavior. So, let us butter our bread with knowledge and embark on this lighthearted yet rigorously calibrated exploration into the intriguing symbiosis of butter consumption and stock prices.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Quanta Services' stock price (PWR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Wealth: Unveiling the Butter-PWR Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the seemingly inexplicable relationship between butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). While one might be tempted to dismiss the idea of any correlation as mere conspiracy churn-theories, our rigorous analysis using USDA butter consumption data paired with LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) stock price data casts new light on the buttery, yet financially potent, topic. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong positive correlation, with a coefficient of 0.8474648 and p-value of less than 0.01 over the time period from 2002 to 2021.

Through this study, we aim to butter up the financial world with insights that may initially seem hard to swallow. Our results not only showcase the pecan-tly butter-PWR relationship, but also highlight the significance of considering unex-peck-ted factors in market analysis. This research, while lighthearted in its presentation, brings to the forefront the potential dairy-lectable market influences that may have been overlooked. So, grab some popcorn and a tub of butter as we dive into the slippery, yet intriguing, world of butter-fueled stock price movement.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of financial markets is often characterized by complexity and unpredictability. As researchers, it is our duty to peel back the layers of obscurity and shed light on the perplexing connections that underlie stock price movements. In this pursuit, we have stumbled upon an unlikely pair - butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). While the initial reaction to such an association may be one of incredulity, it is precisely the improbable nature of this correlation that piqued our interest.
Historically, the financial sector has been notoriously averse to incorporating dairy products into its economic models. However, as we confront the bewildering dance between butter and PWR stock prices, it becomes increasingly clear that the creamy texture of financial analysis can be enhanced by a dash of culinary curiosity. While some may view this endeavor as trivial or mere lipids of imagination, we contend that exploring unorthodox relationships holds the potential to churn out truly enlightening insights.
Our study, featuring a thorough analysis of USDA butter consumption data and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) stock price data, seeks to bring clarity to this enigmatic rapport. We endeavor to peel away the layers of doubt and uncover the buttery truth that seems to linger beneath the surface of stock price volatilities. In doing so, we hope to savor the flavor of unanticipated market dynamics and perhaps even generate a few laughs along the whey.
It is our firm belief that this investigation into the butter-PWR nexus will not only enrich the financial research landscape but also add a sprinkle of whimsy to the otherwise austere realm of market analysis. After all, as we delve into the interplay of creamy indulgence and stock market performance, we might just discover that the not-so-hidden costs of butter are more than mere expenses – they may be key ingredients in the recipe for understanding market behavior. So, let us butter our bread with knowledge and embark on this lighthearted yet rigorously calibrated exploration into the intriguing symbiosis of butter consumption and stock prices.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Exploring Unlikely Market Correlations: A Comprehensive Analysis," Smith and Doe present a comprehensive examination of unexpected correlations in financial markets, highlighting the potential for serendipitous discoveries when exploring unorthodox relationships. Our investigation of the butter-PWR connection is in line with their assertion, as we strive to uncover the underlying mechanisms of this seemingly paradoxical association.

Additionally, Jones et al., in "Unconventional-Factor Economics: Embracing the Quirky," advocate for a more holistic approach to economic analysis, emphasizing the value of incorporating unconventional factors into market research. Our study aligns with their premise, as we delve into the uncharted territory of butter consumption and its peculiar relationship with the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR).

Building upon the foundation laid by these academic works, we turn our attention to non-fiction literature that provides insights into economic dynamics and behavioral patterns. "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers an unconventional perspective on economic phenomena, encouraging readers to reexamine assumptions and seek out unexpected connections – a sentiment that resonates with our exploration of the butter-PWR nexus. Similarly, "Predictably Irrational" by Dan Ariely challenges conventional economic theories, prompting us to consider the irrational, yet influential, factors at play in market behavior.

In the realm of fiction, "The Butter Battle Book" by Dr. Seuss, though seemingly unrelated to financial markets, serves as a whimsical reminder of the potential for unexpected conflicts and resolutions – a parallel to the surprising correlation we have uncovered. Furthermore, "The Cheese Monkeys" by Chip Kidd, while centered on art and design, weaves a narrative that underscores the significance of unconventional thinking and unanticipated connections, themes that echo throughout our investigation of the butter-PWR relationship.

On a more lighthearted note, the television series "The Great British Bake Off" provides an amusing backdrop for our research, reminding us of the delightful and sometimes unpredictable nature of culinary endeavors. Likewise, the financial drama "Billions" offers a fictional portrayal of high-stakes investment strategies, serving as a source of entertainment and inspiration as we navigate the intriguing interplay between butter consumption and stock prices.

As we wade through the diverse reservoirs of literature and media, our journey into the buttery depths of market influence is not only educational but also infused with a generous dollop of unexpected humor and whimsy. In the pursuit of unraveling the butter-PWR connection, we embrace the generosity of laughter and the richness of unexpected insights, recognizing that sometimes, the most extraordinary discoveries emerge from the unlikeliest of sources.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Quanta Services' stock price (PWR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Wealth: Unveiling the Butter-PWR Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the seemingly inexplicable relationship between butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). While one might be tempted to dismiss the idea of any correlation as mere conspiracy churn-theories, our rigorous analysis using USDA butter consumption data paired with LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) stock price data casts new light on the buttery, yet financially potent, topic. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong positive correlation, with a coefficient of 0.8474648 and p-value of less than 0.01 over the time period from 2002 to 2021.

Through this study, we aim to butter up the financial world with insights that may initially seem hard to swallow. Our results not only showcase the pecan-tly butter-PWR relationship, but also highlight the significance of considering unex-peck-ted factors in market analysis. This research, while lighthearted in its presentation, brings to the forefront the potential dairy-lectable market influences that may have been overlooked. So, grab some popcorn and a tub of butter as we dive into the slippery, yet intriguing, world of butter-fueled stock price movement.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of financial markets is often characterized by complexity and unpredictability. As researchers, it is our duty to peel back the layers of obscurity and shed light on the perplexing connections that underlie stock price movements. In this pursuit, we have stumbled upon an unlikely pair - butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). While the initial reaction to such an association may be one of incredulity, it is precisely the improbable nature of this correlation that piqued our interest.
Historically, the financial sector has been notoriously averse to incorporating dairy products into its economic models. However, as we confront the bewildering dance between butter and PWR stock prices, it becomes increasingly clear that the creamy texture of financial analysis can be enhanced by a dash of culinary curiosity. While some may view this endeavor as trivial or mere lipids of imagination, we contend that exploring unorthodox relationships holds the potential to churn out truly enlightening insights.
Our study, featuring a thorough analysis of USDA butter consumption data and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) stock price data, seeks to bring clarity to this enigmatic rapport. We endeavor to peel away the layers of doubt and uncover the buttery truth that seems to linger beneath the surface of stock price volatilities. In doing so, we hope to savor the flavor of unanticipated market dynamics and perhaps even generate a few laughs along the whey.
It is our firm belief that this investigation into the butter-PWR nexus will not only enrich the financial research landscape but also add a sprinkle of whimsy to the otherwise austere realm of market analysis. After all, as we delve into the interplay of creamy indulgence and stock market performance, we might just discover that the not-so-hidden costs of butter are more than mere expenses – they may be key ingredients in the recipe for understanding market behavior. So, let us butter our bread with knowledge and embark on this lighthearted yet rigorously calibrated exploration into the intriguing symbiosis of butter consumption and stock prices.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mysterious connection between butter consumption and Quanta Services' (PWR) stock price, we embarked on an ambitious quest that required the delicate balance of analytical rigor and a touch of whimsy. Our research began by sourcing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for butter consumption figures. We then complemented this dairy-centric approach by obtaining stock price data for Quanta Services (PWR) from the London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) Analytics (Refinitiv).

The first step in our methodology involved churning through copious amounts of historical butter consumption data, dating back to 2002. The USDA provided us with detailed insights into the per capita butter consumption in the United States, enabling us to gauge the fluctuations in this vital ingredient of culinary indulgence over the years. As for the stock price data, we meticulously extracted daily closing prices for Quanta Services (PWR), covering the same time span of 2002 to 2021.

Once we had assembled this delectable dataset, we proceeded to blend the two seemingly incongruent elements – butter consumption and stock prices – using advanced statistical techniques. The statistical analysis involved a complex recipe of correlation assessments, time series modeling, and volatility estimations. The goal of this analytical smorgasbord was to stir up a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between butter consumption and PWR stock prices, all while avoiding any likelihood of a statistical soufflé collapse.

In order to assess the statistical significance and strength of the butter-PWR entanglement, we employed various quantitative tools. The Pearson correlation coefficient was instrumental in quantifying the degree of association between butter consumption and PWR stock prices, and we sipped the tantalizing nectar of statistical significance by calculating the p-value for this correlation. Here, it was imperative to ensure that our findings were not just a mere fluke – after all, we were not in the business of producing half-baked results.

Moreover, we sautéed the dataset in a hedonic regression framework to disentangle the myriad factors that could potentially confound the butter-PWR relationship. This approach allowed us to season our analysis with controls for various market and economic variables, ensuring that the observed association did not melt away under the heat of external influences. We also conducted robustness checks and sensitivity analyses to confirm the stability of our findings, much like ensuring the consistency of a perfectly whipped buttercream frosting.

To address the potential issue of causality, we employed innovative time-series modeling techniques to explore the temporal dynamics between butter consumption and PWR stock prices. This allowed us to discern whether shifts in butter consumption could precede or follow movements in PWR stock prices, or if they were simply ignorant of each other’s presence in the financial kitchen. The result of this intricate exploration furnished us with a deeper understanding of the temporal interplay between these seemingly distant actors in the market drama.

While the complexity of our methods may appear as dense as a rich, velvety butter, the culmination of this rigorous approach has provided us with a newfound appreciation for the interconnection between a ubiquitous culinary delight and the financial dimensions of a publicly traded company. The combination of analytical depth and a sprinkle of mirth in our methodology has yielded a flavorful dish of insights that we are eager to serve up to the academic and financial communities. With our data-driven journey now complete, the time has come to lift the lid on our findings – for the proof of the pudding, or rather, butter, is indeed in the eating.

[Note: A few metaphors and puns are intentionally sprinkled throughout the methodology to add a touch of levity while maintaining the academic tone.]


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Quanta Services' stock price (PWR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8474648, r-squared of 0.7181966, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Wealth: Unveiling the Butter-PWR Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the seemingly inexplicable relationship between butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). While one might be tempted to dismiss the idea of any correlation as mere conspiracy churn-theories, our rigorous analysis using USDA butter consumption data paired with LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) stock price data casts new light on the buttery, yet financially potent, topic. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong positive correlation, with a coefficient of 0.8474648 and p-value of less than 0.01 over the time period from 2002 to 2021.

Through this study, we aim to butter up the financial world with insights that may initially seem hard to swallow. Our results not only showcase the pecan-tly butter-PWR relationship, but also highlight the significance of considering unex-peck-ted factors in market analysis. This research, while lighthearted in its presentation, brings to the forefront the potential dairy-lectable market influences that may have been overlooked. So, grab some popcorn and a tub of butter as we dive into the slippery, yet intriguing, world of butter-fueled stock price movement.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of financial markets is often characterized by complexity and unpredictability. As researchers, it is our duty to peel back the layers of obscurity and shed light on the perplexing connections that underlie stock price movements. In this pursuit, we have stumbled upon an unlikely pair - butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). While the initial reaction to such an association may be one of incredulity, it is precisely the improbable nature of this correlation that piqued our interest.
Historically, the financial sector has been notoriously averse to incorporating dairy products into its economic models. However, as we confront the bewildering dance between butter and PWR stock prices, it becomes increasingly clear that the creamy texture of financial analysis can be enhanced by a dash of culinary curiosity. While some may view this endeavor as trivial or mere lipids of imagination, we contend that exploring unorthodox relationships holds the potential to churn out truly enlightening insights.
Our study, featuring a thorough analysis of USDA butter consumption data and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) stock price data, seeks to bring clarity to this enigmatic rapport. We endeavor to peel away the layers of doubt and uncover the buttery truth that seems to linger beneath the surface of stock price volatilities. In doing so, we hope to savor the flavor of unanticipated market dynamics and perhaps even generate a few laughs along the whey.
It is our firm belief that this investigation into the butter-PWR nexus will not only enrich the financial research landscape but also add a sprinkle of whimsy to the otherwise austere realm of market analysis. After all, as we delve into the interplay of creamy indulgence and stock market performance, we might just discover that the not-so-hidden costs of butter are more than mere expenses – they may be key ingredients in the recipe for understanding market behavior. So, let us butter our bread with knowledge and embark on this lighthearted yet rigorously calibrated exploration into the intriguing symbiosis of butter consumption and stock prices.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis conducted during this study unearthed a notable association between butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). The correlation coefficient between the two variables was calculated to be 0.8474648, indicating a strong positive relationship. In simpler terms, this means that as butter consumption increases, the stock price of Quanta Services tends to also rise, essentially demonstrating that "when there's a butter will, there's a PWR way."

The coefficient of determination (r-squared) was determined to be 0.7181966, suggesting that approximately 71.8% of the variability in PWR stock price can be explained by changes in the consumption of butter. This statistical nugget of information speaks to the tangible influence that butter consumption exerts on the financial performance of Quanta Services, leaving us to ponder the idea that "butter—a financial asset in its own right."

Importantly, the p-value obtained from the analysis was found to be less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant correlation between butter consumption and PWR stock price. This robust statistical evidence substantiates the notion that the butter-PWR connection is not simply a flight of dairy fancy, but a bona fide relationship worthy of consideration in financial forecasting models.

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the strong correlation between butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). The plot distinctly illustrates the upward trajectory of PWR prices alongside the rising trend in butter consumption, evoking the quintessentially rich and creamy link between these seemingly incongruous factors.

This investigation culminates in a butter-at-your-service revelation, underscoring the unlikely influence of butter consumption on the stock market. The findings not only lend credence to the concept that "you can't believe it's not butter—impacting PWR prices," but also prompt a reevaluation of the conventional sources of market volatility.

In summary, the results of this study unwrap an unexpectedly tantalizing connection between butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services. As we butter our way through this unorthodox coupling, it becomes evident that the seemingly separate realms of dairy and finance may in fact be churned together in a symphony of financial flavors, urging market analysts to ponder, "could butter be the unsung hero of stock price movements?"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Quanta Services' stock price (PWR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Wealth: Unveiling the Butter-PWR Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the seemingly inexplicable relationship between butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). While one might be tempted to dismiss the idea of any correlation as mere conspiracy churn-theories, our rigorous analysis using USDA butter consumption data paired with LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) stock price data casts new light on the buttery, yet financially potent, topic. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong positive correlation, with a coefficient of 0.8474648 and p-value of less than 0.01 over the time period from 2002 to 2021.

Through this study, we aim to butter up the financial world with insights that may initially seem hard to swallow. Our results not only showcase the pecan-tly butter-PWR relationship, but also highlight the significance of considering unex-peck-ted factors in market analysis. This research, while lighthearted in its presentation, brings to the forefront the potential dairy-lectable market influences that may have been overlooked. So, grab some popcorn and a tub of butter as we dive into the slippery, yet intriguing, world of butter-fueled stock price movement.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Exploring Unlikely Market Correlations: A Comprehensive Analysis," Smith and Doe present a comprehensive examination of unexpected correlations in financial markets, highlighting the potential for serendipitous discoveries when exploring unorthodox relationships. Our investigation of the butter-PWR connection is in line with their assertion, as we strive to uncover the underlying mechanisms of this seemingly paradoxical association.
Additionally, Jones et al., in "Unconventional-Factor Economics: Embracing the Quirky," advocate for a more holistic approach to economic analysis, emphasizing the value of incorporating unconventional factors into market research. Our study aligns with their premise, as we delve into the uncharted territory of butter consumption and its peculiar relationship with the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR).
Building upon the foundation laid by these academic works, we turn our attention to non-fiction literature that provides insights into economic dynamics and behavioral patterns. "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers an unconventional perspective on economic phenomena, encouraging readers to reexamine assumptions and seek out unexpected connections – a sentiment that resonates with our exploration of the butter-PWR nexus. Similarly, "Predictably Irrational" by Dan Ariely challenges conventional economic theories, prompting us to consider the irrational, yet influential, factors at play in market behavior.
In the realm of fiction, "The Butter Battle Book" by Dr. Seuss, though seemingly unrelated to financial markets, serves as a whimsical reminder of the potential for unexpected conflicts and resolutions – a parallel to the surprising correlation we have uncovered. Furthermore, "The Cheese Monkeys" by Chip Kidd, while centered on art and design, weaves a narrative that underscores the significance of unconventional thinking and unanticipated connections, themes that echo throughout our investigation of the butter-PWR relationship.
On a more lighthearted note, the television series "The Great British Bake Off" provides an amusing backdrop for our research, reminding us of the delightful and sometimes unpredictable nature of culinary endeavors. Likewise, the financial drama "Billions" offers a fictional portrayal of high-stakes investment strategies, serving as a source of entertainment and inspiration as we navigate the intriguing interplay between butter consumption and stock prices.
As we wade through the diverse reservoirs of literature and media, our journey into the buttery depths of market influence is not only educational but also infused with a generous dollop of unexpected humor and whimsy. In the pursuit of unraveling the butter-PWR connection, we embrace the generosity of laughter and the richness of unexpected insights, recognizing that sometimes, the most extraordinary discoveries emerge from the unlikeliest of sources.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis conducted during this study unearthed a notable association between butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). The correlation coefficient between the two variables was calculated to be 0.8474648, indicating a strong positive relationship. In simpler terms, this means that as butter consumption increases, the stock price of Quanta Services tends to also rise, essentially demonstrating that "when there's a butter will, there's a PWR way."
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) was determined to be 0.7181966, suggesting that approximately 71.8% of the variability in PWR stock price can be explained by changes in the consumption of butter. This statistical nugget of information speaks to the tangible influence that butter consumption exerts on the financial performance of Quanta Services, leaving us to ponder the idea that "butter—a financial asset in its own right."
Importantly, the p-value obtained from the analysis was found to be less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant correlation between butter consumption and PWR stock price. This robust statistical evidence substantiates the notion that the butter-PWR connection is not simply a flight of dairy fancy, but a bona fide relationship worthy of consideration in financial forecasting models.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the strong correlation between butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). The plot distinctly illustrates the upward trajectory of PWR prices alongside the rising trend in butter consumption, evoking the quintessentially rich and creamy link between these seemingly incongruous factors.
This investigation culminates in a butter-at-your-service revelation, underscoring the unlikely influence of butter consumption on the stock market. The findings not only lend credence to the concept that "you can't believe it's not butter—impacting PWR prices," but also prompt a reevaluation of the conventional sources of market volatility.
In summary, the results of this study unwrap an unexpectedly tantalizing connection between butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services. As we butter our way through this unorthodox coupling, it becomes evident that the seemingly separate realms of dairy and finance may in fact be churned together in a symphony of financial flavors, urging market analysts to ponder, "could butter be the unsung hero of stock price movements?"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have churned up a compelling revelation regarding the butter-PWR connection. Building on the previous literature, which we p(l)ainly took seriously, our results substantiate the unorthodox yet undeniable influence of butter consumption on the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). As the data suggests, the positive correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors is statistically robust, lending credibility to the idea that butter is not just a spread for toast, but also for stock prices.

Our results align with the premise put forth by Smith, Doe, and, most importantly, Dr. Seuss' "The Butter Battle Book" – where unexpected conflicts and resolutions parallel the surprising correlation we have unveiled. As the coefficient of determination indicates, approximately 71.8% of the variability in PWR stock price can be explained by changes in butter consumption, affirming the dairy-lectable influence on financial performance. It's as if butter is no longer just a tangential dairy product but a pivotal player in the stock market – a real butter stock, one might say.

The statistical nugget of information unearthed in our analysis prompts us to mull over the implications of this buttery association in the financial realm. Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the link between butter consumption and PWR stock price, evoking the quintessentially rich and creamy connection between these dissimilar entities. It's not just a mere spread of data; it’s a rich and creamy link that has the potential to reshape the way we interpret market influences.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the significance of considering unex-peck-ted factors in market analysis. The butter-PWR nexus may seem peculiar, but the robust statistical evidence affirms its relevance in financial forecasting models. As we navigate the whimsical world of butter-fueled stock price movement, our findings underscore the potential dairy influence in the financial market, leaving market analysts to ponder – could butter be the unsung hero of stock price movements? While some may find this correlation hard to digest, the data speaks volumes; perhaps it's time to reconsider the phrase "rags to butter-riches" in the context of financial markets.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Quanta Services' stock price (PWR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Wealth: Unveiling the Butter-PWR Connection

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the seemingly inexplicable relationship between butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). While one might be tempted to dismiss the idea of any correlation as mere conspiracy churn-theories, our rigorous analysis using USDA butter consumption data paired with LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) stock price data casts new light on the buttery, yet financially potent, topic. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong positive correlation, with a coefficient of 0.8474648 and p-value of less than 0.01 over the time period from 2002 to 2021.

Through this study, we aim to butter up the financial world with insights that may initially seem hard to swallow. Our results not only showcase the pecan-tly butter-PWR relationship, but also highlight the significance of considering unex-peck-ted factors in market analysis. This research, while lighthearted in its presentation, brings to the forefront the potential dairy-lectable market influences that may have been overlooked. So, grab some popcorn and a tub of butter as we dive into the slippery, yet intriguing, world of butter-fueled stock price movement.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of financial markets is often characterized by complexity and unpredictability. As researchers, it is our duty to peel back the layers of obscurity and shed light on the perplexing connections that underlie stock price movements. In this pursuit, we have stumbled upon an unlikely pair - butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). While the initial reaction to such an association may be one of incredulity, it is precisely the improbable nature of this correlation that piqued our interest.
Historically, the financial sector has been notoriously averse to incorporating dairy products into its economic models. However, as we confront the bewildering dance between butter and PWR stock prices, it becomes increasingly clear that the creamy texture of financial analysis can be enhanced by a dash of culinary curiosity. While some may view this endeavor as trivial or mere lipids of imagination, we contend that exploring unorthodox relationships holds the potential to churn out truly enlightening insights.
Our study, featuring a thorough analysis of USDA butter consumption data and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) stock price data, seeks to bring clarity to this enigmatic rapport. We endeavor to peel away the layers of doubt and uncover the buttery truth that seems to linger beneath the surface of stock price volatilities. In doing so, we hope to savor the flavor of unanticipated market dynamics and perhaps even generate a few laughs along the whey.
It is our firm belief that this investigation into the butter-PWR nexus will not only enrich the financial research landscape but also add a sprinkle of whimsy to the otherwise austere realm of market analysis. After all, as we delve into the interplay of creamy indulgence and stock market performance, we might just discover that the not-so-hidden costs of butter are more than mere expenses – they may be key ingredients in the recipe for understanding market behavior. So, let us butter our bread with knowledge and embark on this lighthearted yet rigorously calibrated exploration into the intriguing symbiosis of butter consumption and stock prices.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis conducted during this study unearthed a notable association between butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). The correlation coefficient between the two variables was calculated to be 0.8474648, indicating a strong positive relationship. In simpler terms, this means that as butter consumption increases, the stock price of Quanta Services tends to also rise, essentially demonstrating that "when there's a butter will, there's a PWR way."
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) was determined to be 0.7181966, suggesting that approximately 71.8% of the variability in PWR stock price can be explained by changes in the consumption of butter. This statistical nugget of information speaks to the tangible influence that butter consumption exerts on the financial performance of Quanta Services, leaving us to ponder the idea that "butter—a financial asset in its own right."
Importantly, the p-value obtained from the analysis was found to be less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant correlation between butter consumption and PWR stock price. This robust statistical evidence substantiates the notion that the butter-PWR connection is not simply a flight of dairy fancy, but a bona fide relationship worthy of consideration in financial forecasting models.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the strong correlation between butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). The plot distinctly illustrates the upward trajectory of PWR prices alongside the rising trend in butter consumption, evoking the quintessentially rich and creamy link between these seemingly incongruous factors.
This investigation culminates in a butter-at-your-service revelation, underscoring the unlikely influence of butter consumption on the stock market. The findings not only lend credence to the concept that "you can't believe it's not butter—impacting PWR prices," but also prompt a reevaluation of the conventional sources of market volatility.
In summary, the results of this study unwrap an unexpectedly tantalizing connection between butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services. As we butter our way through this unorthodox coupling, it becomes evident that the seemingly separate realms of dairy and finance may in fact be churned together in a symphony of financial flavors, urging market analysts to ponder, "could butter be the unsung hero of stock price movements?"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unveiled a delectable connection between butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). The remarkably strong positive correlation coefficient and the statistically significant p-value lead us to believe that there exists a buttery good relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. As we spread the financial implications of butter consumption, it becomes clear that this study, while undoubtedly cheesy in its nature, holds considerable potential for market analysis. The unanticipated influence of butter on stock prices has churned our assumptions on market volatilities, revealing that perhaps the stock market is not just about "getting your ducks in a row", but also about "spreading your butter on PWR toast."

These findings beg the question, could butter be the new margarine of financial analysis? Should market forecasters now take into account the dairy-licious insights provided by butter consumption data? As we immerse ourselves in the creamy universe of butter-powered market movements, it seems that the notion of "buttering up the stocks" may not be as farfetched as we initially thought. Perhaps there is more to the metaphorical bread and butter of market forces than meets the eye.

In light of these, dare we say, buttery-smooth revelations, it is evident that further research into the interplay of butter consumption and stock prices may lead to even more buttery financial insights. However, given the substantial findings of this study, we butter believe that no more research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Spreading the Wealth: Unveiling the Butter-PWR Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Dairy Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Spreading the Wealth: Unveiling the Butter-PWR Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Spreadable Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Spreading the Wealth: Unveiling the Butter-PWR Connection with an abstract of This paper delves into the seemingly inexplicable relationship between butter consumption and the stock price of Quanta Services (PWR). While one might be tempted to dismiss the idea of any correlation as mere conspiracy churn-theories, our rigorous analysis using USDA butter consumption data paired with LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) stock price data casts new light on the buttery, yet financially potent, topic. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong positive correlation, with a coefficient of 0.8474648 and p-value of less than 0.01 over the time period from 2002 to 2021.
Through this study, we aim to butter up the financial world with insights that may initially seem hard to swallow. Our results not only showcase the pecan-tly butter-PWR relationship, but also highlight the significance of considering unex-peck-ted factors in market analysis. This research, while lighthearted in its presentation, brings to the forefront the potential dairy-lectable market influences that may have been overlooked. So, grab some popcorn and a tub of butter as we dive into the slippery, yet intriguing, world of butter-fueled stock price movement.

ChatGPT:

butter consumption, stock price correlation, Quanta Services, PWR, USDA butter consumption data, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, financial market analysis, market influences, stock price movement, butter-fueled, dairy influence

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Butter consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Butter in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Butter consumption

Quanta Services' stock price (PWR)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Quanta Services (PWR) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Quanta Services' stock price (PWR)

Correlation r = 0.8474648 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7181966 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 71.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Quanta Services' stock price (PWR)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Butter consumption) over the 20 years from 2002 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.41E-6. 0.0000024071030958877380000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 0.000241% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 415,437 random variables You don't actually need 415 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.65, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Butter consumption (Pounds per person)4.44.54.54.54.74.7554.95.45.55.55.55.65.75.766.26.36.5
Quanta Services' stock price (PWR) (Stock price)15.63.67.387.9713.2619.7926.0919.9121.1220.0222.0427.8531.3728.5719.9735.1639.2929.6441.0770.9




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.4,4.5,4.5,4.5,4.7,4.7,5,5,4.9,5.4,5.5,5.5,5.5,5.6,5.7,5.7,6,6.2,6.3,6.5,])
array_2 = np.array([15.6,3.6,7.38,7.97,13.26,19.79,26.09,19.91,21.12,20.02,22.04,27.85,31.37,28.57,19.97,35.16,39.29,29.64,41.07,70.9,])
array_1_name = "Butter consumption"
array_2_name = "Quanta Services' stock price (PWR)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 3095 · Black Variable ID: 557 · Red Variable ID: 1842
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0