about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,091 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the second variable is American Express Company's stock price (AXP).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As households spent more on delicious animal products, they were overcome with the urge to dine out at fancy restaurants. They swiped their American Express cards with abandon, leading to higher revenue and ultimately boosting the stock price of the company. It’s like the circle of carnivorous capitalism!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALL·E, using the following style: [ Photorealism ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, a bustling city street filled with people carrying bags of fresh groceries is depicted. The individuals are shown with improved muscular definition and a confident stride. They carry cuts of meat, poultry, fish, and cartons of eggs, and the scene is rendered in a vivid and lifelike manner. Additionally, a dynamic digital billboard prominently displays the American Express Company's stock ticker, showing a visible upward trend. This vividly captures the energy and optimism of the city's bustling economy. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and American Express Company's stock price (AXP). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: inspired by bauhaus Glitch art A scene from Skyrim Cutsy graphics Photorealism
ChatGPT: Photorealism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and American Express Company's stock price (AXP), in the following situation: Because as people ate more meat, they got stronger and were able to work harder, leading to more people getting promotions and bonuses, which they put on their American Express cards, boosting the company's stock price.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, a bustling city street is filled with people carrying bags of groceries, featuring cuts of meat, poultry, fish, and cartons of eggs. As they walk with a spring in their step, their muscles look stronger, and they confidently head to work. Alongside them, the American Express Company's stock ticker flashes on a digital billboard, showing an upward trend, as excited investors watch its rise.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Photorealism ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, a bustling city street is filled with people carrying bags of groceries, featuring cuts of meat, poultry, fish, and cartons of eggs. As they walk with a spring in their step, their muscles look stronger, and they confidently head to work. Alongside them, the American Express Company's stock ticker flashes on a digital billboard, showing an upward trend, as excited investors watch its rise. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALL·E, using the following style: [ Photorealism ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, a bustling city street filled with people carrying bags of fresh groceries is depicted. The individuals are shown with improved muscular definition and a confident stride. They carry cuts of meat, poultry, fish, and cartons of eggs, and the scene is rendered in a vivid and lifelike manner. Additionally, a dynamic digital billboard prominently displays the American Express Company's stock ticker, showing a visible upward trend. This vividly captures the energy and optimism of the city's bustling economy.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs caused American Express Company's stock price (AXP) to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Grilling the Numbers: A Meaty Analysis of Annual US Household Spending on Animal Protein and American Express Company's Stock Price

The Journal of Culinary Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and American Express Company's stock price (AXP). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9052435 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Grilling the Numbers: A Meaty Analysis of Annual US Household Spending on Animal Protein and American Express Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a thorough investigation into the curious and at times utterly bizarre relationship between the annual spending habits of American households on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock price of the American Express Company. We have utilized data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to grill through the numbers, aiming to understand whether there is a substantial correlation between American meat-eating habits and the financial performance of this iconic financial services corporation. Our analysis, covering the period from 2002 to 2022, has yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9052435, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a "meaty" connection between consumer spending on animal protein and the performance of American Express Company's stocks. We hope this paper will beef up the understanding of the financial implications of carnivorous consumer behavior and underscore the importance of delving into unexpected avenues of economic analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and American Express Company's stock price (AXP). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Grilling the Numbers: A Meaty Analysis of Annual US Household Spending on Animal Protein and American Express Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a thorough investigation into the curious and at times utterly bizarre relationship between the annual spending habits of American households on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock price of the American Express Company. We have utilized data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to grill through the numbers, aiming to understand whether there is a substantial correlation between American meat-eating habits and the financial performance of this iconic financial services corporation. Our analysis, covering the period from 2002 to 2022, has yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9052435, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a "meaty" connection between consumer spending on animal protein and the performance of American Express Company's stocks. We hope this paper will beef up the understanding of the financial implications of carnivorous consumer behavior and underscore the importance of delving into unexpected avenues of economic analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Meat consumption and stock prices - an unlikely pairing, a seemingly incongruous duo, a match made in...the financial markets? Well, hold onto your hats as we embark on a meaty adventure through the labyrinth of consumer spending and stock market gyrations. We are about to delve into the world of beef, chicken, fish, eggs, and a pinch of financial wizardry to uncover a potential link between annual US household spending on animal protein and the stock price of the American Express Company (AXP).

As financial analysts, we are often encouraged to think outside the box, but in this case, we are grilling the box and everything inside it! The idea of investigating the intersection between carnivorous consumer habits and stock market performance may seem far-fetched, but as the data started sizzling, something rare and well-done emerged - a correlation that could very well be the missing link that connects the dinner table to the trading floor.

While this study may seem like a departure from the usual beans and bonds or pork bellies and treasury yields, it is precisely this uncharted territory that adds spice to the world of economic analysis. By examining the annual spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs, we hope to offer insights into the potential impact of consumer behavior on the financial performance of a major player in the credit card and financial services arena.

So, fasten your seatbelts, put on your chef's hat, and get ready for a journey through the sauce-laden landscape of consumer appetites, financial markets, and the tantalizing aroma of statistical significance. Let's not chicken out now; there's a lot at stake, and it's not just the barbeque!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and American Express Company's stock price (AXP). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Grilling the Numbers: A Meaty Analysis of Annual US Household Spending on Animal Protein and American Express Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a thorough investigation into the curious and at times utterly bizarre relationship between the annual spending habits of American households on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock price of the American Express Company. We have utilized data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to grill through the numbers, aiming to understand whether there is a substantial correlation between American meat-eating habits and the financial performance of this iconic financial services corporation. Our analysis, covering the period from 2002 to 2022, has yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9052435, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a "meaty" connection between consumer spending on animal protein and the performance of American Express Company's stocks. We hope this paper will beef up the understanding of the financial implications of carnivorous consumer behavior and underscore the importance of delving into unexpected avenues of economic analysis.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Meat consumption and stock prices - an unlikely pairing, a seemingly incongruous duo, a match made in...the financial markets? Well, hold onto your hats as we embark on a meaty adventure through the labyrinth of consumer spending and stock market gyrations. We are about to delve into the world of beef, chicken, fish, eggs, and a pinch of financial wizardry to uncover a potential link between annual US household spending on animal protein and the stock price of the American Express Company (AXP).
As financial analysts, we are often encouraged to think outside the box, but in this case, we are grilling the box and everything inside it! The idea of investigating the intersection between carnivorous consumer habits and stock market performance may seem far-fetched, but as the data started sizzling, something rare and well-done emerged - a correlation that could very well be the missing link that connects the dinner table to the trading floor.
While this study may seem like a departure from the usual beans and bonds or pork bellies and treasury yields, it is precisely this uncharted territory that adds spice to the world of economic analysis. By examining the annual spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs, we hope to offer insights into the potential impact of consumer behavior on the financial performance of a major player in the credit card and financial services arena.
So, fasten your seatbelts, put on your chef's hat, and get ready for a journey through the sauce-laden landscape of consumer appetites, financial markets, and the tantalizing aroma of statistical significance. Let's not chicken out now; there's a lot at stake, and it's not just the barbeque!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith et al. (2015) first delved into the relationship between household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs, and stock prices with a serious and deliberate air. Their work laid the foundation for subsequent research, exhibiting a meticulous and scholarly approach. But let’s face it, discussing meat consumption and stock prices in the same breath is like trying to mix oil and water - it seems like a recipe for disaster! Nevertheless, we must press on, armed with our skewers of statistical analysis and a side of humor.

Doe and Jones (2018) carried the torch further, presenting their findings with a straight face and no-nonsense demeanor. Their approach was as robust as a T-bone steak, and their results were met with beefed-up interest from the academic community. However, the question remains - did they have the chops to truly grill through the complexities of this unorthodox investigation?

In "Meatonomics: How the Rigged Economics of Meat and Dairy Make You Consume Too Much––and How to Eat Better, Live Longer, and Spend Smarter" by Simon, the authors provide a captivating exploration of the economic and societal impact of meat consumption. Although not directly related to stock prices, the book offers a prime cut of insights into consumer behavior and its implications.

On a more fictional note, "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald and "Moby-Dick" by Herman Melville may not seem immediately relevant, but they do feature lavish scenes of extravagant feasts and, in the case of the latter, the pursuit of a great white whale. Perhaps there's an allegorical connection waiting to be unearthed, an epic narrative of consumer appetites and financial pursuits that transcends time and genre.

Turning our attention to less conventional sources of inspiration, "Settlers of Catan" and "Monopoly" are board games with subtle nods to economic concepts and the ebbs and flows of financial fortune. While not directly addressing the meat-market correlation with stock prices, they encourage strategic thinking, negotiation, and the occasional questionable trade deal - skills that could very well come in handy when navigating the intricacies of this meaty analysis.

As we navigate this meat-infused labyrinth of economic analysis, let us remember that the pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths. In the words of Sirloin Bacon, the renowned philosopher and part-time butcher, "Where there's smoke, there's flavor - and perhaps a correlation worth sizzling for."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and American Express Company's stock price (AXP). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Grilling the Numbers: A Meaty Analysis of Annual US Household Spending on Animal Protein and American Express Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a thorough investigation into the curious and at times utterly bizarre relationship between the annual spending habits of American households on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock price of the American Express Company. We have utilized data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to grill through the numbers, aiming to understand whether there is a substantial correlation between American meat-eating habits and the financial performance of this iconic financial services corporation. Our analysis, covering the period from 2002 to 2022, has yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9052435, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a "meaty" connection between consumer spending on animal protein and the performance of American Express Company's stocks. We hope this paper will beef up the understanding of the financial implications of carnivorous consumer behavior and underscore the importance of delving into unexpected avenues of economic analysis.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Meat consumption and stock prices - an unlikely pairing, a seemingly incongruous duo, a match made in...the financial markets? Well, hold onto your hats as we embark on a meaty adventure through the labyrinth of consumer spending and stock market gyrations. We are about to delve into the world of beef, chicken, fish, eggs, and a pinch of financial wizardry to uncover a potential link between annual US household spending on animal protein and the stock price of the American Express Company (AXP).
As financial analysts, we are often encouraged to think outside the box, but in this case, we are grilling the box and everything inside it! The idea of investigating the intersection between carnivorous consumer habits and stock market performance may seem far-fetched, but as the data started sizzling, something rare and well-done emerged - a correlation that could very well be the missing link that connects the dinner table to the trading floor.
While this study may seem like a departure from the usual beans and bonds or pork bellies and treasury yields, it is precisely this uncharted territory that adds spice to the world of economic analysis. By examining the annual spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs, we hope to offer insights into the potential impact of consumer behavior on the financial performance of a major player in the credit card and financial services arena.
So, fasten your seatbelts, put on your chef's hat, and get ready for a journey through the sauce-laden landscape of consumer appetites, financial markets, and the tantalizing aroma of statistical significance. Let's not chicken out now; there's a lot at stake, and it's not just the barbeque!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In this meaty research endeavor, we utilized a combination of statistical and econometric methods to thoroughly chew through the relationship between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock price of the American Express Company (AXP). To tenderize our data, we embarked on an epic quest through the annals of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), carefully selecting juicy datasets from the years 2002 to 2022.

Our carnivorous adventure began with the collection of household expenditure data on animal protein, sourced from the Consumer Expenditure Survey conducted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. We sliced and diced the expenditure data based on categories such as fresh meats, processed meats, poultry, fish, and eggs, ensuring that we had a meat-eater's paradise of information at our disposal.

Next, we gnawed through the historical stock price data of American Express Company (AXP) sourced from the esteemed LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), encompassing daily closing prices over the same period. The stock price data was meticulously marinated with care to ensure the reliability and flavor of our findings.

With our jaws fully occupied by these tantalizing sets of data, we proceeded to sink our teeth into the heart of statistical analysis. We employed a series of rigorous techniques, including but not limited to correlation analysis, regression modeling, and time series analysis, to extract the essence of the relationship between household spending on animal protein and the performance of AXP stock. These models were concocted with just the right blend of variables, ensuring that our results didn't end up overcooked or underdone.

Furthermore, we implemented a battery of diagnostic tests to validate the robustness of our findings and to ensure that our analysis was free from any rotten data or statistical indigestion. Our tests included checks for multicollinearity, heteroskedasticity, and serial correlation, as we wanted our results to be as lean and mean as a well-trimmed steak.

Lastly, to ensure that our findings were not mere statistical flukes, we subjected our results to a battery of statistical significance tests, including t-tests and F-tests. We wanted our conclusions to be so compelling that they could cut through skepticism like a sharp knife through a succulent pork chop.

In summary, our research methodology was a blend of data curation, statistical gymnastics, and a dash of culinary flair, performed with the precision of a master chef and the tenacity of a hungry bear. This approach allowed us to sink our teeth into the potential correlation between carnivorous household spending and the financial performance of American Express Company's stock, offering a rare and delicious glimpse into the world of consumer appetites and financial markets.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and American Express Company's stock price (AXP). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9052435, r-squared of 0.8194659, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Grilling the Numbers: A Meaty Analysis of Annual US Household Spending on Animal Protein and American Express Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a thorough investigation into the curious and at times utterly bizarre relationship between the annual spending habits of American households on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock price of the American Express Company. We have utilized data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to grill through the numbers, aiming to understand whether there is a substantial correlation between American meat-eating habits and the financial performance of this iconic financial services corporation. Our analysis, covering the period from 2002 to 2022, has yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9052435, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a "meaty" connection between consumer spending on animal protein and the performance of American Express Company's stocks. We hope this paper will beef up the understanding of the financial implications of carnivorous consumer behavior and underscore the importance of delving into unexpected avenues of economic analysis.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Meat consumption and stock prices - an unlikely pairing, a seemingly incongruous duo, a match made in...the financial markets? Well, hold onto your hats as we embark on a meaty adventure through the labyrinth of consumer spending and stock market gyrations. We are about to delve into the world of beef, chicken, fish, eggs, and a pinch of financial wizardry to uncover a potential link between annual US household spending on animal protein and the stock price of the American Express Company (AXP).
As financial analysts, we are often encouraged to think outside the box, but in this case, we are grilling the box and everything inside it! The idea of investigating the intersection between carnivorous consumer habits and stock market performance may seem far-fetched, but as the data started sizzling, something rare and well-done emerged - a correlation that could very well be the missing link that connects the dinner table to the trading floor.
While this study may seem like a departure from the usual beans and bonds or pork bellies and treasury yields, it is precisely this uncharted territory that adds spice to the world of economic analysis. By examining the annual spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs, we hope to offer insights into the potential impact of consumer behavior on the financial performance of a major player in the credit card and financial services arena.
So, fasten your seatbelts, put on your chef's hat, and get ready for a journey through the sauce-laden landscape of consumer appetites, financial markets, and the tantalizing aroma of statistical significance. Let's not chicken out now; there's a lot at stake, and it's not just the barbeque!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock price of the American Express Company (AXP) has rendered some "juicy" results, to say the least. From 2002 to 2022, we found a positively "meat"-y correlation coefficient of 0.9052435, implying a strong association between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.8194659 suggests that a whopping 81.95% of the variability in AXP stock price can be explained by changes in annual meat-related expenditures. It's safe to say that this correlation is not just a "fluke," but perhaps a "fillet" of truth in the financial markets.

Remarkably, our analysis also revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying an exceedingly significant relationship between these two factors. This suggests that the likelihood of this association occurring by mere chance is about as low as the fat content in a skinless chicken breast. In other words, the probability of this being a "meat" coincidence is about as slim as a finely sliced prosciutto!

Our findings indicate that there is more to this link than meets the eye or the appetite. The figure (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates this "meaty" connection with a scatterplot showcasing the strong, linear relationship between annual meat-related expenditure and AXP stock price. It's clear that this is not just a "steak" of luck, but a statistical phenomenon worth sinking your teeth into.

In conclusion, our study suggests that consumer spending on animal protein may have a palpable impact on the financial performance of the American Express Company. So, the next time someone tells you that "you are what you eat," it's worth considering that your stock portfolio might also reflect your dining preferences. This "beefed-up" understanding of the financial implications of carnivorous consumer behavior sheds light on an unexplored dimension of economic analysis and serves as a friendly reminder that in the world of finance, there's always a "meaty" surprise around the corner!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and American Express Company's stock price (AXP). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Grilling the Numbers: A Meaty Analysis of Annual US Household Spending on Animal Protein and American Express Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a thorough investigation into the curious and at times utterly bizarre relationship between the annual spending habits of American households on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock price of the American Express Company. We have utilized data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to grill through the numbers, aiming to understand whether there is a substantial correlation between American meat-eating habits and the financial performance of this iconic financial services corporation. Our analysis, covering the period from 2002 to 2022, has yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9052435, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a "meaty" connection between consumer spending on animal protein and the performance of American Express Company's stocks. We hope this paper will beef up the understanding of the financial implications of carnivorous consumer behavior and underscore the importance of delving into unexpected avenues of economic analysis.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2015) first delved into the relationship between household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs, and stock prices with a serious and deliberate air. Their work laid the foundation for subsequent research, exhibiting a meticulous and scholarly approach. But let’s face it, discussing meat consumption and stock prices in the same breath is like trying to mix oil and water - it seems like a recipe for disaster! Nevertheless, we must press on, armed with our skewers of statistical analysis and a side of humor.
Doe and Jones (2018) carried the torch further, presenting their findings with a straight face and no-nonsense demeanor. Their approach was as robust as a T-bone steak, and their results were met with beefed-up interest from the academic community. However, the question remains - did they have the chops to truly grill through the complexities of this unorthodox investigation?
In "Meatonomics: How the Rigged Economics of Meat and Dairy Make You Consume Too Much––and How to Eat Better, Live Longer, and Spend Smarter" by Simon, the authors provide a captivating exploration of the economic and societal impact of meat consumption. Although not directly related to stock prices, the book offers a prime cut of insights into consumer behavior and its implications.
On a more fictional note, "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald and "Moby-Dick" by Herman Melville may not seem immediately relevant, but they do feature lavish scenes of extravagant feasts and, in the case of the latter, the pursuit of a great white whale. Perhaps there's an allegorical connection waiting to be unearthed, an epic narrative of consumer appetites and financial pursuits that transcends time and genre.
Turning our attention to less conventional sources of inspiration, "Settlers of Catan" and "Monopoly" are board games with subtle nods to economic concepts and the ebbs and flows of financial fortune. While not directly addressing the meat-market correlation with stock prices, they encourage strategic thinking, negotiation, and the occasional questionable trade deal - skills that could very well come in handy when navigating the intricacies of this meaty analysis.
As we navigate this meat-infused labyrinth of economic analysis, let us remember that the pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths. In the words of Sirloin Bacon, the renowned philosopher and part-time butcher, "Where there's smoke, there's flavor - and perhaps a correlation worth sizzling for."

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock price of the American Express Company (AXP) has rendered some "juicy" results, to say the least. From 2002 to 2022, we found a positively "meat"-y correlation coefficient of 0.9052435, implying a strong association between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.8194659 suggests that a whopping 81.95% of the variability in AXP stock price can be explained by changes in annual meat-related expenditures. It's safe to say that this correlation is not just a "fluke," but perhaps a "fillet" of truth in the financial markets.
Remarkably, our analysis also revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying an exceedingly significant relationship between these two factors. This suggests that the likelihood of this association occurring by mere chance is about as low as the fat content in a skinless chicken breast. In other words, the probability of this being a "meat" coincidence is about as slim as a finely sliced prosciutto!
Our findings indicate that there is more to this link than meets the eye or the appetite. The figure (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates this "meaty" connection with a scatterplot showcasing the strong, linear relationship between annual meat-related expenditure and AXP stock price. It's clear that this is not just a "steak" of luck, but a statistical phenomenon worth sinking your teeth into.
In conclusion, our study suggests that consumer spending on animal protein may have a palpable impact on the financial performance of the American Express Company. So, the next time someone tells you that "you are what you eat," it's worth considering that your stock portfolio might also reflect your dining preferences. This "beefed-up" understanding of the financial implications of carnivorous consumer behavior sheds light on an unexplored dimension of economic analysis and serves as a friendly reminder that in the world of finance, there's always a "meaty" surprise around the corner!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have certainly grilled up some tantalizing insights into the connection between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock price of the American Express Company (AXP). As we reflect on the meaty journey we've ventured upon, it's evident that our results resonate with the prior research in this quirky field.

First, let's revisit the work of Smith et al. (2015), who took a serious stab at exploring the relationship between carnivorous cravings and stock prices. Our study's reaffirmation of their initial findings certainly suggests that there's more to this topic than meets the eye - or the appetite, for that matter! It seems that their meticulous approach has indeed laid a sturdy foundation for us to build upon, even if the topic at hand is as incongruous as a tofu-scented steak.

Moreover, the robust findings of Doe and Jones (2018) undeniably add weight to the argument that there's a substantial link between consumer spending on animal protein and AXP stock price. One might say that they truly had the chops to tackle this unorthodox investigation, and our results have only added a succulent layer of confirmation to their prior work. It seems that our statistical analysis might have indeed grilled through the complexities of this "meaty" correlation, proving that this is more than just a flash in the pan.

Not to mention, the more unconventional sources of inspiration, such as "The Great Gatsby" and "Moby-Dick," have given us food for thought, or should I say, food for meat. While not directly related to stock prices, their exploration of lavish feasts and epic pursuits may not be entirely far-fetched in the context of our research. After all, the financial world is no stranger to its own brand of grand feasts and white whales. It's as if our findings have unearthed an allegorical connection that was simmering just beneath the surface, like a well-marinated steak awaiting its moment of revelation.

In essence, our results stand as a testament to the unexpected yet impactful relationship between consumer appetites and financial pursuits. Much like how a perfectly grilled steak surprises the taste buds, our study has revealed a correlation that adds a "meaty" surprise to the world of economic analysis. It seems that when it comes to the financial markets, there's always a "meaty" twist waiting to be uncovered - and we've certainly sunk our teeth into this one!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and American Express Company's stock price (AXP). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Grilling the Numbers: A Meaty Analysis of Annual US Household Spending on Animal Protein and American Express Company's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present a thorough investigation into the curious and at times utterly bizarre relationship between the annual spending habits of American households on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock price of the American Express Company. We have utilized data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to grill through the numbers, aiming to understand whether there is a substantial correlation between American meat-eating habits and the financial performance of this iconic financial services corporation. Our analysis, covering the period from 2002 to 2022, has yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9052435, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a "meaty" connection between consumer spending on animal protein and the performance of American Express Company's stocks. We hope this paper will beef up the understanding of the financial implications of carnivorous consumer behavior and underscore the importance of delving into unexpected avenues of economic analysis.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Meat consumption and stock prices - an unlikely pairing, a seemingly incongruous duo, a match made in...the financial markets? Well, hold onto your hats as we embark on a meaty adventure through the labyrinth of consumer spending and stock market gyrations. We are about to delve into the world of beef, chicken, fish, eggs, and a pinch of financial wizardry to uncover a potential link between annual US household spending on animal protein and the stock price of the American Express Company (AXP).
As financial analysts, we are often encouraged to think outside the box, but in this case, we are grilling the box and everything inside it! The idea of investigating the intersection between carnivorous consumer habits and stock market performance may seem far-fetched, but as the data started sizzling, something rare and well-done emerged - a correlation that could very well be the missing link that connects the dinner table to the trading floor.
While this study may seem like a departure from the usual beans and bonds or pork bellies and treasury yields, it is precisely this uncharted territory that adds spice to the world of economic analysis. By examining the annual spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs, we hope to offer insights into the potential impact of consumer behavior on the financial performance of a major player in the credit card and financial services arena.
So, fasten your seatbelts, put on your chef's hat, and get ready for a journey through the sauce-laden landscape of consumer appetites, financial markets, and the tantalizing aroma of statistical significance. Let's not chicken out now; there's a lot at stake, and it's not just the barbeque!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock price of the American Express Company (AXP) has rendered some "juicy" results, to say the least. From 2002 to 2022, we found a positively "meat"-y correlation coefficient of 0.9052435, implying a strong association between these seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.8194659 suggests that a whopping 81.95% of the variability in AXP stock price can be explained by changes in annual meat-related expenditures. It's safe to say that this correlation is not just a "fluke," but perhaps a "fillet" of truth in the financial markets.
Remarkably, our analysis also revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying an exceedingly significant relationship between these two factors. This suggests that the likelihood of this association occurring by mere chance is about as low as the fat content in a skinless chicken breast. In other words, the probability of this being a "meat" coincidence is about as slim as a finely sliced prosciutto!
Our findings indicate that there is more to this link than meets the eye or the appetite. The figure (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates this "meaty" connection with a scatterplot showcasing the strong, linear relationship between annual meat-related expenditure and AXP stock price. It's clear that this is not just a "steak" of luck, but a statistical phenomenon worth sinking your teeth into.
In conclusion, our study suggests that consumer spending on animal protein may have a palpable impact on the financial performance of the American Express Company. So, the next time someone tells you that "you are what you eat," it's worth considering that your stock portfolio might also reflect your dining preferences. This "beefed-up" understanding of the financial implications of carnivorous consumer behavior sheds light on an unexplored dimension of economic analysis and serves as a friendly reminder that in the world of finance, there's always a "meaty" surprise around the corner!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has proven to be quite the "meat"-y endeavor, yielding insights that are both rare and well-done. The statistically significant correlation between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock price of the American Express Company (AXP) has left us with food for thought and stock for laughter. It seems that the financial markets may have a taste for carnivorous consumer behavior, serving up a correlation coefficient of 0.9052435 that is as robust as a prime cut of steak.

Our findings point to a strong connection between consumer spending on animal protein and the performance of AXP stock, highlighting the notion that perhaps Wall Street and the dinner plate are not as distant as they seem. It's as if the financial markets have developed a "filet-tion" for meat-related expenditures, providing a new angle to chew on when analyzing stock market movements.

As we wrap up this meat-infused financial odyssey, it is clear that there is no need to continue "beef"-ing up this connection between dietary choices and stock prices. Our findings have "grilled" through the numbers and presented a well-marbled relationship that is as "meat"-y as it gets. So, let's sizzle down and chew on this data without the need for any further "seasoning" of research in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Grilling the Numbers: A Meaty Analysis of Annual US Household Spending on Animal Protein and American Express Company's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Culinary Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Grilling the Numbers: A Meaty Analysis of Annual US Household Spending on Animal Protein and American Express Company's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Alliance for Culinary and Financial Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Grilling the Numbers: A Meaty Analysis of Annual US Household Spending on Animal Protein and American Express Company's Stock Price with an abstract of In this paper, we present a thorough investigation into the curious and at times utterly bizarre relationship between the annual spending habits of American households on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock price of the American Express Company. We have utilized data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to grill through the numbers, aiming to understand whether there is a substantial correlation between American meat-eating habits and the financial performance of this iconic financial services corporation. Our analysis, covering the period from 2002 to 2022, has yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9052435, with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship. Our findings suggest that there may indeed be a "meaty" connection between consumer spending on animal protein and the performance of American Express Company's stocks. We hope this paper will beef up the understanding of the financial implications of carnivorous consumer behavior and underscore the importance of delving into unexpected avenues of economic analysis.

ChatGPT:

annual household spending, animal protein, American households, meat, poultry, fish, eggs, Bureau of Labor Statistics, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, correlation, financial performance, American Express Company, stock price, meat-eating habits, consumer spending, financial implications, carnivorous consumer behavior, economic analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs
Detailed data title: Average annual household spend on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs

American Express Company's stock price (AXP)
Detailed data title: Opening price of American Express Company (AXP) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with American Express Company's stock price (AXP)

Correlation r = 0.9052435 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8194659 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., American Express Company's stock price (AXP)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.71E-8. 0.0000000170980508726584400000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 1.71E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 58,486,199 random variables You don't actually need 58 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.78, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs (Household spend)798825880764797777846841784832852856892896890944961980107511151216
American Express Company's stock price (AXP) (Stock price)31.3431.4742.5849.7651.761.1852.0918.5740.8143.348.358.3390.993.1768.0974.8999.7393.91124.66121.3164.51




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([798,825,880,764,797,777,846,841,784,832,852,856,892,896,890,944,961,980,1075,1115,1216,])
array_2 = np.array([31.34,31.47,42.58,49.76,51.7,61.18,52.09,18.57,40.81,43.3,48.3,58.33,90.9,93.17,68.09,74.89,99.73,93.91,124.66,121.3,164.51,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs"
array_2_name = "American Express Company's stock price (AXP)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 3091 · Black Variable ID: 19888 · Red Variable ID: 1618
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0