about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,059 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Denver and the second variable is Solar power generated in South Korea.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more babies were named Denver, their parents unconsciously gravitated towards sunny, positive vibes. This inadvertently led to a surge in upbeat energy in South Korea, thereby boosting the solar power generated. It's like the whole country got a dose of sunshine-infused motivation from the name alone!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars': In a bustling South Korean city, a newborn named Denver is celebrated by his family. People passing by start to associate the name with the Mile High City and its bright, clear skies. This sparks curiosity and excitement around solar power, leading to an increase in solar panels gleaming on rooftops and in fields. The connection between the name Denver and solar power shines a light on renewable energy, brightening the city with its sustainable glow. The city skyline is punctuated by the glow of solar panels, creating a futuristic and sustainable landscape. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Denver and Solar power generated in South Korea. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a funny image you would see on reddit Cubism An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Concept art Magic realism
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Denver and Solar power generated in South Korea, in the following situation: Because as the popularity of the name Denver soared, more people started associating it with the Mile High City, which reminded them of clear, sunny skies. This mental connection led to a surge in interest in solar power, ultimately causing South Korea to increase its solar power generation, proving that even baby names can shine a light on renewable energy solutions!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling South Korean city, a newborn named Denver is celebrated by his family. People passing by start to associate the name with the Mile High City and its bright, clear skies. This sparks curiosity and excitement around solar power, leading to an increase in solar panels gleaming on rooftops and in fields. The connection between the name Denver and solar power shines a light on renewable energy, brightening the city with its sustainable glow.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling South Korean city, a newborn named Denver is celebrated by his family. People passing by start to associate the name with the Mile High City and its bright, clear skies. This sparks curiosity and excitement around solar power, leading to an increase in solar panels gleaming on rooftops and in fields. The connection between the name Denver and solar power shines a light on renewable energy, brightening the city with its sustainable glow. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars': In a bustling South Korean city, a newborn named Denver is celebrated by his family. People passing by start to associate the name with the Mile High City and its bright, clear skies. This sparks curiosity and excitement around solar power, leading to an increase in solar panels gleaming on rooftops and in fields. The connection between the name Denver and solar power shines a light on renewable energy, brightening the city with its sustainable glow. The city skyline is punctuated by the glow of solar panels, creating a futuristic and sustainable landscape.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Denver caused Solar power generated in South Korea to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Illuminating Influence of Denver: Examining the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name and Solar Power Generation in South Korea

Journal of Solar Psychology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Denver and Solar power generated in South Korea. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9733270 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Illuminating Influence of Denver: Examining the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name and Solar Power Generation in South Korea

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study delves into the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name *Denver* and the solar power generation in South Korea. Utilizing comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we, the solar sleuths, conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1990 to 2021. Our investigation unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9733270 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

With a twinkle in our eye, we contemplated the puzzling connection between the name *Denver* and solar power - could it be the allure of the city's skyline or the inspiration drawn from the Denver Broncos' sunny disposition? These were questions that sparked more intrigue than an eclipse!

The findings of our research shed light on this peculiar link and provide illuminating insights into the factors that may influence the adoption of solar power technologies. By unraveling this enigma, we aim to spark discussions that echo the very essence of solar power - bright and boundless. After all, with *Denver* around, it's a guarantee that sunnier days are ahead!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Denver and Solar power generated in South Korea. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Illuminating Influence of Denver: Examining the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name and Solar Power Generation in South Korea

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study delves into the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name *Denver* and the solar power generation in South Korea. Utilizing comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we, the solar sleuths, conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1990 to 2021. Our investigation unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9733270 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

With a twinkle in our eye, we contemplated the puzzling connection between the name *Denver* and solar power - could it be the allure of the city's skyline or the inspiration drawn from the Denver Broncos' sunny disposition? These were questions that sparked more intrigue than an eclipse!

The findings of our research shed light on this peculiar link and provide illuminating insights into the factors that may influence the adoption of solar power technologies. By unraveling this enigma, we aim to spark discussions that echo the very essence of solar power - bright and boundless. After all, with *Denver* around, it's a guarantee that sunnier days are ahead!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea has sparked our intellectual curiosity. As researchers, we strive to shed light on the unexpected connections that permeate our world, even if they seem as unlikely as a solar-powered flashlight at midnight.

The influence of names on individual behavior and societal trends has been a subject of fascination for scholars across various disciplines. From the impact of names on career opportunities to their reflection of cultural shifts, the significance of nomenclature has not escaped the discerning eye of researchers. In this study, we bring this inquiry to the realm of renewable energy and solar power generation, aiming to uncover whether there might be a luminous link between the popularity of the name Denver and solar power output in South Korea.

As we embarked on this quest, we found ourselves pondering the age-old question: What do you call a solar-powered dog? A sun-dog! The levity of this pun was a welcome contrast to our rigorous statistical analyses, serving as a reminder of the importance of balancing gravitas with good-natured humor in academic pursuits.

The intersection of solar power generation and the first name Denver may offer unexpected insights into the influences that shape societal preferences. Just as a sudden burst of sunshine can brighten an unexpected rainy day, our research aims to illuminate the factors that drive the adoption of solar power technologies – regardless of whether they stem from the whims of nomenclature or the whims of weather.

As we delve into the data and delve into dad jokes, we invite fellow scholars and enthusiasts to join us in unraveling this remarkable conundrum, ensuring that our pursuit of knowledge remains as exhilarating as a solar flare and as joyous as a pun-laden conversation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Denver and Solar power generated in South Korea. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Illuminating Influence of Denver: Examining the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name and Solar Power Generation in South Korea

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study delves into the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name *Denver* and the solar power generation in South Korea. Utilizing comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we, the solar sleuths, conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1990 to 2021. Our investigation unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9733270 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

With a twinkle in our eye, we contemplated the puzzling connection between the name *Denver* and solar power - could it be the allure of the city's skyline or the inspiration drawn from the Denver Broncos' sunny disposition? These were questions that sparked more intrigue than an eclipse!

The findings of our research shed light on this peculiar link and provide illuminating insights into the factors that may influence the adoption of solar power technologies. By unraveling this enigma, we aim to spark discussions that echo the very essence of solar power - bright and boundless. After all, with *Denver* around, it's a guarantee that sunnier days are ahead!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea has sparked our intellectual curiosity. As researchers, we strive to shed light on the unexpected connections that permeate our world, even if they seem as unlikely as a solar-powered flashlight at midnight.
The influence of names on individual behavior and societal trends has been a subject of fascination for scholars across various disciplines. From the impact of names on career opportunities to their reflection of cultural shifts, the significance of nomenclature has not escaped the discerning eye of researchers. In this study, we bring this inquiry to the realm of renewable energy and solar power generation, aiming to uncover whether there might be a luminous link between the popularity of the name Denver and solar power output in South Korea.
As we embarked on this quest, we found ourselves pondering the age-old question: What do you call a solar-powered dog? A sun-dog! The levity of this pun was a welcome contrast to our rigorous statistical analyses, serving as a reminder of the importance of balancing gravitas with good-natured humor in academic pursuits.
The intersection of solar power generation and the first name Denver may offer unexpected insights into the influences that shape societal preferences. Just as a sudden burst of sunshine can brighten an unexpected rainy day, our research aims to illuminate the factors that drive the adoption of solar power technologies – regardless of whether they stem from the whims of nomenclature or the whims of weather.
As we delve into the data and delve into dad jokes, we invite fellow scholars and enthusiasts to join us in unraveling this remarkable conundrum, ensuring that our pursuit of knowledge remains as exhilarating as a solar flare and as joyous as a pun-laden conversation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between the popularity of the first name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea has been previously unexplored, prompting the present investigation into this compelling and unlikely correlation. As we embark on this scholarly journey, it is pertinent to review existing literature that may shed light on this unconventional association.

In "Smith et al.'s study," the authors find lorem ipsum, shedding light on the influence of names on societal trends and individual behavior. This study serves as a foundational piece in understanding the impact of nomenclature, although it regrettably does not explore the specific connection between the name Denver and solar power. Nevertheless, it primes us for the arduous task of delving into the arcane world of names and their unforeseen influences.

Amidst the seriousness of academic inquiry, a moment of levity is warranted. Why did the solar panel break up with the battery? It couldn't hold a charge! Humor, after all, is a universal language that transcends disciplines and invites engagement with scholarly endeavors.

In "Doe's comprehensive analysis," the authors present compelling evidence suggesting a correlation between nomenclature and environmental attitudes. While this work offers valuable insights, it overlooks the unique case of Denver and its resonance with solar power generation in South Korea. Indeed, this gap in the literature propelled our research to illuminate the uncharted territories of solar power and naming conventions.

Venturing into more unconventional sources, "The Solar-Powered Name Game" by Lucas and "The Radiant Moniker: A Study of Solar-Powered Names" by Peterson may at first appear fictitious, but their tangentially related titles surprisingly delve into the cultural implications of solar energy and nomenclature. While they do not provide empirical evidence, their imaginative exploration ignites a spark of creativity in our scholarly pursuits, much like the spark of a solar flare in a distant galaxy.

Informed by a wide array of unconventional sources, including fictional narratives such as "Sunset Boulevard: A Novel of Solar Proportions" by Sinclair and "The Luminescent Legacy of Luminous Larry" by Roberts, our literature review takes an unprecedented turn towards the whimsical. Yet, it is within this realm of creative license that we might find inspiration and unexpected connections – the very essence of scholarly exploration.

As our omniscient quest for literature extended beyond the traditional confines, we encountered unexpected sources, including but not limited to, handwritten notes on napkins, messages in bottles, and even interpretive dance performances inspired by the enigmatic cabal of solar-powered names. It is worth noting that while these unconventional sources may not adhere to conventional scholarly standards, they have undoubtedly broadened the horizons of our inquiry and imbued it with an unconventional flair.

In conclusion, the literature surrounding the correlation between the name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea, while sparse, offers diverse perspectives that illuminate the interdisciplinary nature of this inquiry, transcending the boundaries of conventional scholarship. And so, as we navigate this intellectual terrain, the question looms: What did the solar panel say to the name Denver? I've got you covered!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Denver and Solar power generated in South Korea. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1990 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Illuminating Influence of Denver: Examining the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name and Solar Power Generation in South Korea

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study delves into the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name *Denver* and the solar power generation in South Korea. Utilizing comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we, the solar sleuths, conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1990 to 2021. Our investigation unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9733270 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

With a twinkle in our eye, we contemplated the puzzling connection between the name *Denver* and solar power - could it be the allure of the city's skyline or the inspiration drawn from the Denver Broncos' sunny disposition? These were questions that sparked more intrigue than an eclipse!

The findings of our research shed light on this peculiar link and provide illuminating insights into the factors that may influence the adoption of solar power technologies. By unraveling this enigma, we aim to spark discussions that echo the very essence of solar power - bright and boundless. After all, with *Denver* around, it's a guarantee that sunnier days are ahead!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea has sparked our intellectual curiosity. As researchers, we strive to shed light on the unexpected connections that permeate our world, even if they seem as unlikely as a solar-powered flashlight at midnight.
The influence of names on individual behavior and societal trends has been a subject of fascination for scholars across various disciplines. From the impact of names on career opportunities to their reflection of cultural shifts, the significance of nomenclature has not escaped the discerning eye of researchers. In this study, we bring this inquiry to the realm of renewable energy and solar power generation, aiming to uncover whether there might be a luminous link between the popularity of the name Denver and solar power output in South Korea.
As we embarked on this quest, we found ourselves pondering the age-old question: What do you call a solar-powered dog? A sun-dog! The levity of this pun was a welcome contrast to our rigorous statistical analyses, serving as a reminder of the importance of balancing gravitas with good-natured humor in academic pursuits.
The intersection of solar power generation and the first name Denver may offer unexpected insights into the influences that shape societal preferences. Just as a sudden burst of sunshine can brighten an unexpected rainy day, our research aims to illuminate the factors that drive the adoption of solar power technologies – regardless of whether they stem from the whims of nomenclature or the whims of weather.
As we delve into the data and delve into dad jokes, we invite fellow scholars and enthusiasts to join us in unraveling this remarkable conundrum, ensuring that our pursuit of knowledge remains as exhilarating as a solar flare and as joyous as a pun-laden conversation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To tackle the perplexing connection between the popularity of the name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea, our research team employed a multifaceted approach that combined data mining, statistical modeling, and a healthy dose of curious conjecture. Our quest for enlightenment began with the retrieval of historical baby name records from the US Social Security Administration, which provided us with comprehensive data on the frequency of the name Denver from 1990 to 2021. We chose the name Denver for its geographical connotations, hoping it would shed light on any localized influences in the realm of solar power generation.

With the fervor of aurora chasers seeking a rare glimpse of cosmic brilliance, we scoured the Energy Information Administration database to capture the temporal dynamics of solar power generation in South Korea over the same period. The juxtaposition of these disparate datasets set the stage for an analytical waltz that aimed to reveal the hidden patterns beneath the celestial dance of nomenclature and renewable energy.

Upon assembling the datasets, we proceeded to establish the statistical framework for our investigation. We applied a series of time series analyses, regression models, and correlation tests to discern any significant relationship between the popularity of the name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea. This analytical cornucopia allowed us to unravel the intricate tapestry of variables and unearth the potential interplay between human nomenclature and the harnessing of solar energy.

In the spirit of scientific camaraderie, we indulged in the occasional pun to infuse moments of levity into our rigorous methodology. Who knew that solar puns could be so illuminating? It was as if we were basking in the radiant glow of scholarly wit, knowing that our unconventional investigation was casting a solar flare of curiosity across the academic landscape.

Further bolstering our methodology, we engaged in exploratory data visualization techniques, rendering the quantitative insights in a visually appealing manner. By charting the temporal trends of solar power generation against the ebbs and flows of the name Denver’s popularity, we aimed to paint a portrait of these seemingly disparate phenomena converging in a harmonious display of statistical synergy.

In an effort to mitigate potential confounding variables, we integrated socioeconomic indicators and meteorological data into our analyses, ensuring that our findings stood as resolute as a lighthouse amidst the statistical sea. Additionally, we engaged in a sensitivity analysis to gauge the robustness of our results and ascertain the persistence of the observed correlation under varying conditions.

As our data-driven odyssey drew to a close, we were prepared to solemnly report our findings with the gravity befitting such a scholarly pursuit. However, we couldn't resist a final pun. Why don't solar panels ever tell jokes? Because they always get overshadowed! With our methodology as radiant as a solar-powered smile, we present the fruit of our research for the enlightenment and amusement of our esteemed colleagues and readers alike.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Denver and Solar power generated in South Korea. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1990 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9733270, r-squared of 0.9473654, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Illuminating Influence of Denver: Examining the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name and Solar Power Generation in South Korea

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study delves into the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name *Denver* and the solar power generation in South Korea. Utilizing comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we, the solar sleuths, conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1990 to 2021. Our investigation unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9733270 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

With a twinkle in our eye, we contemplated the puzzling connection between the name *Denver* and solar power - could it be the allure of the city's skyline or the inspiration drawn from the Denver Broncos' sunny disposition? These were questions that sparked more intrigue than an eclipse!

The findings of our research shed light on this peculiar link and provide illuminating insights into the factors that may influence the adoption of solar power technologies. By unraveling this enigma, we aim to spark discussions that echo the very essence of solar power - bright and boundless. After all, with *Denver* around, it's a guarantee that sunnier days are ahead!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea has sparked our intellectual curiosity. As researchers, we strive to shed light on the unexpected connections that permeate our world, even if they seem as unlikely as a solar-powered flashlight at midnight.
The influence of names on individual behavior and societal trends has been a subject of fascination for scholars across various disciplines. From the impact of names on career opportunities to their reflection of cultural shifts, the significance of nomenclature has not escaped the discerning eye of researchers. In this study, we bring this inquiry to the realm of renewable energy and solar power generation, aiming to uncover whether there might be a luminous link between the popularity of the name Denver and solar power output in South Korea.
As we embarked on this quest, we found ourselves pondering the age-old question: What do you call a solar-powered dog? A sun-dog! The levity of this pun was a welcome contrast to our rigorous statistical analyses, serving as a reminder of the importance of balancing gravitas with good-natured humor in academic pursuits.
The intersection of solar power generation and the first name Denver may offer unexpected insights into the influences that shape societal preferences. Just as a sudden burst of sunshine can brighten an unexpected rainy day, our research aims to illuminate the factors that drive the adoption of solar power technologies – regardless of whether they stem from the whims of nomenclature or the whims of weather.
As we delve into the data and delve into dad jokes, we invite fellow scholars and enthusiasts to join us in unraveling this remarkable conundrum, ensuring that our pursuit of knowledge remains as exhilarating as a solar flare and as joyous as a pun-laden conversation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration revealed a robust correlation between the popularity of the first name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea. Over the period of 1990 to 2021, a correlation coefficient of 0.9733270 was observed, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This correlation was supported by an r-squared value of 0.9473654, signifying that approximately 94.74% of the variation in solar power generation can be explained by the popularity of the name Denver. Not since the discovery of electricity has there been such a shocking revelation!

Furthermore, the statistical significance of the correlation was confirmed with a p-value of less than 0.01. This indicates that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between these variables by mere chance is less than 1%, reinforcing the validity of our findings.

The correlation is vividly depicted in Figure 1, which provides a striking visual representation of the strong connection between the popularity of the name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea. The scatterplot in Figure 1 illuminates the data points, showcasing the coalescence of these two seemingly incongruous phenomena. The correlation is so strong that it's almost as if the solar power output is saying, "Hey there, Denver!"

Our research not only establishes the existence of this unexpected association but also sparks a solar sense of humor, showcasing the intriguing nature of this correlation. Much like the sun setting over the Denver skyline, our findings set the stage for further exploration of the multifaceted influences on solar power adoption and for countless dad jokes about solar energy – after all, we don't want to be too "photon-bombed" with serious talk.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Denver and Solar power generated in South Korea. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Illuminating Influence of Denver: Examining the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name and Solar Power Generation in South Korea

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study delves into the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name *Denver* and the solar power generation in South Korea. Utilizing comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we, the solar sleuths, conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1990 to 2021. Our investigation unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9733270 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

With a twinkle in our eye, we contemplated the puzzling connection between the name *Denver* and solar power - could it be the allure of the city's skyline or the inspiration drawn from the Denver Broncos' sunny disposition? These were questions that sparked more intrigue than an eclipse!

The findings of our research shed light on this peculiar link and provide illuminating insights into the factors that may influence the adoption of solar power technologies. By unraveling this enigma, we aim to spark discussions that echo the very essence of solar power - bright and boundless. After all, with *Denver* around, it's a guarantee that sunnier days are ahead!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between the popularity of the first name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea has been previously unexplored, prompting the present investigation into this compelling and unlikely correlation. As we embark on this scholarly journey, it is pertinent to review existing literature that may shed light on this unconventional association.
In "Smith et al.'s study," the authors find lorem ipsum, shedding light on the influence of names on societal trends and individual behavior. This study serves as a foundational piece in understanding the impact of nomenclature, although it regrettably does not explore the specific connection between the name Denver and solar power. Nevertheless, it primes us for the arduous task of delving into the arcane world of names and their unforeseen influences.
Amidst the seriousness of academic inquiry, a moment of levity is warranted. Why did the solar panel break up with the battery? It couldn't hold a charge! Humor, after all, is a universal language that transcends disciplines and invites engagement with scholarly endeavors.
In "Doe's comprehensive analysis," the authors present compelling evidence suggesting a correlation between nomenclature and environmental attitudes. While this work offers valuable insights, it overlooks the unique case of Denver and its resonance with solar power generation in South Korea. Indeed, this gap in the literature propelled our research to illuminate the uncharted territories of solar power and naming conventions.
Venturing into more unconventional sources, "The Solar-Powered Name Game" by Lucas and "The Radiant Moniker: A Study of Solar-Powered Names" by Peterson may at first appear fictitious, but their tangentially related titles surprisingly delve into the cultural implications of solar energy and nomenclature. While they do not provide empirical evidence, their imaginative exploration ignites a spark of creativity in our scholarly pursuits, much like the spark of a solar flare in a distant galaxy.
Informed by a wide array of unconventional sources, including fictional narratives such as "Sunset Boulevard: A Novel of Solar Proportions" by Sinclair and "The Luminescent Legacy of Luminous Larry" by Roberts, our literature review takes an unprecedented turn towards the whimsical. Yet, it is within this realm of creative license that we might find inspiration and unexpected connections – the very essence of scholarly exploration.
As our omniscient quest for literature extended beyond the traditional confines, we encountered unexpected sources, including but not limited to, handwritten notes on napkins, messages in bottles, and even interpretive dance performances inspired by the enigmatic cabal of solar-powered names. It is worth noting that while these unconventional sources may not adhere to conventional scholarly standards, they have undoubtedly broadened the horizons of our inquiry and imbued it with an unconventional flair.
In conclusion, the literature surrounding the correlation between the name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea, while sparse, offers diverse perspectives that illuminate the interdisciplinary nature of this inquiry, transcending the boundaries of conventional scholarship. And so, as we navigate this intellectual terrain, the question looms: What did the solar panel say to the name Denver? I've got you covered!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration revealed a robust correlation between the popularity of the first name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea. Over the period of 1990 to 2021, a correlation coefficient of 0.9733270 was observed, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This correlation was supported by an r-squared value of 0.9473654, signifying that approximately 94.74% of the variation in solar power generation can be explained by the popularity of the name Denver. Not since the discovery of electricity has there been such a shocking revelation!
Furthermore, the statistical significance of the correlation was confirmed with a p-value of less than 0.01. This indicates that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between these variables by mere chance is less than 1%, reinforcing the validity of our findings.
The correlation is vividly depicted in Figure 1, which provides a striking visual representation of the strong connection between the popularity of the name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea. The scatterplot in Figure 1 illuminates the data points, showcasing the coalescence of these two seemingly incongruous phenomena. The correlation is so strong that it's almost as if the solar power output is saying, "Hey there, Denver!"
Our research not only establishes the existence of this unexpected association but also sparks a solar sense of humor, showcasing the intriguing nature of this correlation. Much like the sun setting over the Denver skyline, our findings set the stage for further exploration of the multifaceted influences on solar power adoption and for countless dad jokes about solar energy – after all, we don't want to be too "photon-bombed" with serious talk.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust correlation uncovered between the popularity of the name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea lends credence to the unexpected yet compelling association posited in earlier literature. Our findings not only affirm the existence of this remarkable link but also illuminate new avenues for scholarly inquiry into the influences on renewable energy adoption.

The pronounced correlation coefficient of 0.9733270 aligns with the findings of previous studies that have explored the influence of nomenclature on societal trends. While the connection between a name and solar power generation may seem as unlikely as a sunbather in a blizzard, our results underscore the potential significance of seemingly peripheral factors in shaping attitudes towards sustainable energy. As the saying goes, the sun never knew how great it was until it hit the side of a building.

The r-squared value of 0.9473654 further solidifies the strength of the relationship between the popularity of the name Denver and solar power generation, highlighting the substantial variation in the latter that can be explained by the former. One could say that this correlation shines brighter than a solar panel at high noon!

The statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, not only imparts confidence in the reliability of our findings but also underscores the unlikelihood of observing such a strong relationship by mere chance. This fortifies our assertion that the connection between the name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea transcends mere coincidence and warrants further investigation. It seems that the name Denver has truly left an indelible mark on the radiant landscape of solar energy adoption, much like a sunspot leaving a mark on the solar surface.

Our study aligns with prior research that has explored the influence of nomenclature on environmental attitudes and societal trends, indicating that names may hold unforeseen sway over individual behaviors and preferences. As the field continues to evolve, it is essential to embrace unconventional and unexpected associations, much like the puzzling yet unmistakable correlation between the name Denver and solar power generation. After all, in the realm of scholarly inquiry, the unexpected is to be embraced, much like finding a solar-powered calculator in a blackout.

In conclusion, the unexpected connection between the popularity of the name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea not only challenges conventional notions of influential factors in renewable energy adoption but also sparks a solar sense of humor, offering a lighthearted perspective on an otherwise serious topic. Our findings serve as a beacon of curiosity, ushering in a new dawn of interdisciplinary exploration into the multifaceted influences on solar power adoption. As the solar industry continues to innovate, this peculiar correlation reminds us that beneath the seriousness of scholarly inquiry lies an inexhaustible well of unexpected connections - much like finding sunshine in the unlikeliest of places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Denver and Solar power generated in South Korea. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Illuminating Influence of Denver: Examining the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name and Solar Power Generation in South Korea

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study delves into the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name *Denver* and the solar power generation in South Korea. Utilizing comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we, the solar sleuths, conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1990 to 2021. Our investigation unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9733270 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

With a twinkle in our eye, we contemplated the puzzling connection between the name *Denver* and solar power - could it be the allure of the city's skyline or the inspiration drawn from the Denver Broncos' sunny disposition? These were questions that sparked more intrigue than an eclipse!

The findings of our research shed light on this peculiar link and provide illuminating insights into the factors that may influence the adoption of solar power technologies. By unraveling this enigma, we aim to spark discussions that echo the very essence of solar power - bright and boundless. After all, with *Denver* around, it's a guarantee that sunnier days are ahead!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea has sparked our intellectual curiosity. As researchers, we strive to shed light on the unexpected connections that permeate our world, even if they seem as unlikely as a solar-powered flashlight at midnight.
The influence of names on individual behavior and societal trends has been a subject of fascination for scholars across various disciplines. From the impact of names on career opportunities to their reflection of cultural shifts, the significance of nomenclature has not escaped the discerning eye of researchers. In this study, we bring this inquiry to the realm of renewable energy and solar power generation, aiming to uncover whether there might be a luminous link between the popularity of the name Denver and solar power output in South Korea.
As we embarked on this quest, we found ourselves pondering the age-old question: What do you call a solar-powered dog? A sun-dog! The levity of this pun was a welcome contrast to our rigorous statistical analyses, serving as a reminder of the importance of balancing gravitas with good-natured humor in academic pursuits.
The intersection of solar power generation and the first name Denver may offer unexpected insights into the influences that shape societal preferences. Just as a sudden burst of sunshine can brighten an unexpected rainy day, our research aims to illuminate the factors that drive the adoption of solar power technologies – regardless of whether they stem from the whims of nomenclature or the whims of weather.
As we delve into the data and delve into dad jokes, we invite fellow scholars and enthusiasts to join us in unraveling this remarkable conundrum, ensuring that our pursuit of knowledge remains as exhilarating as a solar flare and as joyous as a pun-laden conversation.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration revealed a robust correlation between the popularity of the first name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea. Over the period of 1990 to 2021, a correlation coefficient of 0.9733270 was observed, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This correlation was supported by an r-squared value of 0.9473654, signifying that approximately 94.74% of the variation in solar power generation can be explained by the popularity of the name Denver. Not since the discovery of electricity has there been such a shocking revelation!
Furthermore, the statistical significance of the correlation was confirmed with a p-value of less than 0.01. This indicates that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship between these variables by mere chance is less than 1%, reinforcing the validity of our findings.
The correlation is vividly depicted in Figure 1, which provides a striking visual representation of the strong connection between the popularity of the name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea. The scatterplot in Figure 1 illuminates the data points, showcasing the coalescence of these two seemingly incongruous phenomena. The correlation is so strong that it's almost as if the solar power output is saying, "Hey there, Denver!"
Our research not only establishes the existence of this unexpected association but also sparks a solar sense of humor, showcasing the intriguing nature of this correlation. Much like the sun setting over the Denver skyline, our findings set the stage for further exploration of the multifaceted influences on solar power adoption and for countless dad jokes about solar energy – after all, we don't want to be too "photon-bombed" with serious talk.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has unearthed a radiant correlation between the popularity of the first name Denver and solar power generation in South Korea. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9733270 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 illuminate a remarkably strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the sun has figuratively shone upon this unexpected connection, basking it in a glow of statistical significance.

This correlation prompts us to ponder, why did the solar panel go to school? To get a little brighter! Indeed, the illumination provided by our findings presents a sunny outlook on the potential influences, be they cultural, psychological, or atmospheric, that may underpin the adoption of solar power technologies. The intersection of nomenclature and renewable energy adoption showcases the whimsical nature of statistical inquiry – a reminder that even in the realm of rigorous analysis, a dash of levity can shine as brightly as the sun itself.

The vivid manifestation of this correlation in Figure 1 serves as a testament to the captivating nature of this discovery. It is almost as if the solar power output is greeting the name Denver with open arms, ready to engage in a radiant tango of undeniable connection. Our research not only sheds light on this unexpected association but also kindles a solar sense of humor, a reminder that even in the sunniest of statistics, a good pun can be as illuminating as a well-crafted regression model.

In essence, our findings extend a beacon of insight into the multifaceted influences shaping the adoption of solar power technologies. With this in mind, we assert that no further research in this area is needed, as we have surely reached the zenith of solar-powered statistical inquiry. After all, why study the sun when you can bask in its statistical splendor?

And remember, when it comes to solar energy and statistical research, it's important to always stay positive – just like the correlation coefficient in our study!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Illuminating Influence of Denver: Examining the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name and Solar Power Generation in South Korea. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Solar Psychology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Illuminating Influence of Denver: Examining the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name and Solar Power Generation in South Korea. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Solar Semantics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Illuminating Influence of Denver: Examining the Correlation Between the Popularity of the Name and Solar Power Generation in South Korea with an abstract of The study delves into the curious correlation between the popularity of the first name *Denver* and the solar power generation in South Korea. Utilizing comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we, the solar sleuths, conducted a rigorous analysis spanning the years 1990 to 2021. Our investigation unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9733270 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.
With a twinkle in our eye, we contemplated the puzzling connection between the name *Denver* and solar power - could it be the allure of the city's skyline or the inspiration drawn from the Denver Broncos' sunny disposition? These were questions that sparked more intrigue than an eclipse!
The findings of our research shed light on this peculiar link and provide illuminating insights into the factors that may influence the adoption of solar power technologies. By unraveling this enigma, we aim to spark discussions that echo the very essence of solar power - bright and boundless. After all, with *Denver* around, it's a guarantee that sunnier days are ahead!

ChatGPT:

Denver name popularity, solar power generation, correlation, South Korea, US Social Security Administration, Energy Information Administration, analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, solar power adoption, solar power technologies, Denver Broncos, city skyline, solar power influence

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Denver
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Denver
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Denver

Solar power generated in South Korea
Detailed data title: Total solar power generated in South Korea in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Solar power generated in South Korea

Correlation r = 0.9733270 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9473654 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Solar power generated in South Korea) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Denver) over the 32 years from 1990 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.8E-21. 0.0000000000000000000097683578
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 9.8E-19% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 102,371,352,531,742,851,072 random variables You don't actually need 102 quintillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 31 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 31 because we have two variables measured over a period of 32 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.95, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Denver (Babies born)117123132132174171165175221251204198179189164179186191217179172200206244312439450491619723837944
Solar power generated in South Korea (Billion kWh)0.0010.0010.0020.0020.0020.0020.0030.0030.0040.0050.0050.0060.0070.0080.010.0150.0310.070.2850.5660.7720010.9159991.1011.5952.5473.885.0687.054249.2071212.99517.965623.9501




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([117,123,132,132,174,171,165,175,221,251,204,198,179,189,164,179,186,191,217,179,172,200,206,244,312,439,450,491,619,723,837,944,])
array_2 = np.array([0.001,0.001,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.003,0.003,0.004,0.005,0.005,0.006,0.007,0.008,0.01,0.015,0.031,0.07,0.285,0.566,0.772001,0.915999,1.101,1.595,2.547,3.88,5.068,7.05424,9.20712,12.995,17.9656,23.9501,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Denver"
array_2_name = "Solar power generated in South Korea"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 3059 · Black Variable ID: 3893 · Red Variable ID: 23990
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0