about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,053 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Number of public school students in 7th grade and the second variable is Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of 7th graders swells, so does the demand for knowledge...and hotdogs. It's a classic case of bun and learn – more students means more energy, leading to an upsurge in hotdog consumption. It seems the 7th grade truly is the wurst!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a vivid and humorous portrayal of a Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Depict the champion, a larger-than-life figure, devouring an ever-increasing pile of hotdogs amidst the cheering crowd. Meanwhile, the lines of rival 7th grade public school students twist and coil around with eager faces, each holding multiple hotdogs. The champion’s determination contrasts with the sheer joy and competitive spirit of the students, forming a comical and lively scene that would spark amusement on Reddit. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Number of public school students in 7th grade and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art Steampunk a funny image you would see on reddit 3D Pixar Style Psychedelic
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Number of public school students in 7th grade and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, in the following situation: As the number of 7th grade students increased, so did the demand for hotdogs as a result of an elaborate prank war between rival middle schools, ultimately leading to a surge in hotdog consumption at the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, the champion is devouring an increasing number of hotdogs as the line of 7th grade public school students from rival middle schools grows longer. The students, fueled by a prank war, can't seem to get enough hotdogs, while the champion eagerly devours them, setting a new record for hotdog consumption.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, the champion is devouring an increasing number of hotdogs as the line of 7th grade public school students from rival middle schools grows longer. The students, fueled by a prank war, can't seem to get enough hotdogs, while the champion eagerly devours them, setting a new record for hotdog consumption. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a vivid and humorous portrayal of a Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Depict the champion, a larger-than-life figure, devouring an ever-increasing pile of hotdogs amidst the cheering crowd. Meanwhile, the lines of rival 7th grade public school students twist and coil around with eager faces, each holding multiple hotdogs. The champion’s determination contrasts with the sheer joy and competitive spirit of the students, forming a comical and lively scene that would spark amusement on Reddit.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Number of public school students in 7th grade caused Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Seventh Grade Sausage Saga: A Statistical Study of Student Numbers and Sausage Consumption

The Journal of Adolescent Gastronomy

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 7th grade and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8136279 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Seventh Grade Sausage Saga: A Statistical Study of Student Numbers and Sausage Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the surprising world of statistical connections between the number of public school students in 7th grade and the consumption of hotdogs by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Unraveling the mystery of this seemingly unrelated pairing, our study utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Wikipedia to analyze the correlation over the years 1990 to 2022. The results yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8136279, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a significant association. Our findings not only provide statistical evidence of this quirky relationship but also offer potential avenues for further investigation into the enigmatic link between junior high demographics and competitive hot dog consumption. Hilarity and statistical significance ensue.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 7th grade and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Seventh Grade Sausage Saga: A Statistical Study of Student Numbers and Sausage Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the surprising world of statistical connections between the number of public school students in 7th grade and the consumption of hotdogs by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Unraveling the mystery of this seemingly unrelated pairing, our study utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Wikipedia to analyze the correlation over the years 1990 to 2022. The results yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8136279, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a significant association. Our findings not only provide statistical evidence of this quirky relationship but also offer potential avenues for further investigation into the enigmatic link between junior high demographics and competitive hot dog consumption. Hilarity and statistical significance ensue.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The tantalizing scent of sizzling sausages may not be the first thing that comes to mind when contemplating the intricate webs of statistical analysis. However, the unexpected connection between the number of public school students in 7th grade and the hotdog consumption by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion has piqued the curiosity of researchers and hotdog enthusiasts alike. This unconventional pairing has sparked a trove of statistical inquiries, prompting us to delve into the mysterious realm of hotdogs and adolescent education.

In the grand tradition of statistical sleuthing, our research sought to unravel the enigma surrounding the correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. Employing data sourced from the esteemed National Center for Education Statistics and the font of wisdom known as Wikipedia, we embarked on a journey to unmask the statistical cloak veiling the relationship between 7th-grade student numbers and competitive hotdog consumption. Our ambitious undertaking aimed to shed light on this bewildering alliance and provide a glimpse into the whimsical nature of statistical associations.

While the wry grins and raised eyebrows at the mention of this unusual partnership are entirely justified, our rigorous analysis uncovered a startling revelation. The numbers spoke volumes, or shall we say, shouted with the resonance of a stadium hotdog vendor. The statistical scrutiny yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8136279, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a robust and statistically significant association.

The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of statistical quirkiness, offering a gateway into the whimsical world of junior high demographics and competitive hotdog consumption. As we navigate through the corridors of this eccentric connection, we invite readers to join us in this scholarly escapade, where hilarity and statistical significance intertwine.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 7th grade and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Seventh Grade Sausage Saga: A Statistical Study of Student Numbers and Sausage Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the surprising world of statistical connections between the number of public school students in 7th grade and the consumption of hotdogs by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Unraveling the mystery of this seemingly unrelated pairing, our study utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Wikipedia to analyze the correlation over the years 1990 to 2022. The results yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8136279, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a significant association. Our findings not only provide statistical evidence of this quirky relationship but also offer potential avenues for further investigation into the enigmatic link between junior high demographics and competitive hot dog consumption. Hilarity and statistical significance ensue.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The tantalizing scent of sizzling sausages may not be the first thing that comes to mind when contemplating the intricate webs of statistical analysis. However, the unexpected connection between the number of public school students in 7th grade and the hotdog consumption by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion has piqued the curiosity of researchers and hotdog enthusiasts alike. This unconventional pairing has sparked a trove of statistical inquiries, prompting us to delve into the mysterious realm of hotdogs and adolescent education.
In the grand tradition of statistical sleuthing, our research sought to unravel the enigma surrounding the correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. Employing data sourced from the esteemed National Center for Education Statistics and the font of wisdom known as Wikipedia, we embarked on a journey to unmask the statistical cloak veiling the relationship between 7th-grade student numbers and competitive hotdog consumption. Our ambitious undertaking aimed to shed light on this bewildering alliance and provide a glimpse into the whimsical nature of statistical associations.
While the wry grins and raised eyebrows at the mention of this unusual partnership are entirely justified, our rigorous analysis uncovered a startling revelation. The numbers spoke volumes, or shall we say, shouted with the resonance of a stadium hotdog vendor. The statistical scrutiny yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8136279, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a robust and statistically significant association.
The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of statistical quirkiness, offering a gateway into the whimsical world of junior high demographics and competitive hotdog consumption. As we navigate through the corridors of this eccentric connection, we invite readers to join us in this scholarly escapade, where hilarity and statistical significance intertwine.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Several previous studies have delved into the intricate world of statistical oddities and unexpected correlations. Smith (2015) analyzed the consumption patterns of competitive eaters and identified peculiar links between their food intake and seemingly unrelated demographic factors. Doe (2018) investigated the influence of educational trends on unconventional dietary habits, shedding light on the curious interplay between scholastic environments and competitive eating prowess. Similarly, Jones (2020) explored the whimsical relationships between junior high demographics and the gastronomic feats of champion eaters, uncovering a tapestry of statistical curiosities.

Turning to the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Statistical Significance of Sausages" by A. Researcher and B. Analyst (2019) offers a comprehensive overview of unusual correlations in food consumption, providing a glimpse into the surprising world of statistical oddities. Likewise, "Between Buns: A Statistical Study of Sausage Consumption" by C. Statistician (2020) offers a thorough examination of quirky food trends and their inexplicable associations with demographic variables.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, the works of "Sausage Sleuths and Statistical Surprises" by D. Novelist (2016) and "The Mysterious Link: 7th Grade and Hotdog Consumption" by E. Author (2017) present imaginative tales of statistical anomalies and culinary capers, offering a light-hearted take on the peculiar connections between adolescent education and competitive eating.

Furthermore, anecdotal evidence gleaned from social media sources revealed intriguing observations, with users reporting whimsical musings on the correlation between 7th-grade population trends and the voracious appetite of competitive eating champions. One post, in particular, cited the uncanny coincidence of a surge in hotdog consumption coinciding with fluctuations in 7th-grade student numbers, prompting a flurry of lighthearted speculations and comical anecdotes.

The literature, ranging from serious academic works to whimsical fiction and social media anecdotes, offers a diverse tapestry of perspectives on the surprising union between 7th-grade student numbers and hotdog consumption by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. As we plunge into the depths of this statistical journey, the fusion of scholarly findings and humorous insights promises a delightful exploration of this curiously charming correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 7th grade and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Wikipedia . You used data from 1990 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Seventh Grade Sausage Saga: A Statistical Study of Student Numbers and Sausage Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the surprising world of statistical connections between the number of public school students in 7th grade and the consumption of hotdogs by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Unraveling the mystery of this seemingly unrelated pairing, our study utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Wikipedia to analyze the correlation over the years 1990 to 2022. The results yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8136279, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a significant association. Our findings not only provide statistical evidence of this quirky relationship but also offer potential avenues for further investigation into the enigmatic link between junior high demographics and competitive hot dog consumption. Hilarity and statistical significance ensue.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The tantalizing scent of sizzling sausages may not be the first thing that comes to mind when contemplating the intricate webs of statistical analysis. However, the unexpected connection between the number of public school students in 7th grade and the hotdog consumption by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion has piqued the curiosity of researchers and hotdog enthusiasts alike. This unconventional pairing has sparked a trove of statistical inquiries, prompting us to delve into the mysterious realm of hotdogs and adolescent education.
In the grand tradition of statistical sleuthing, our research sought to unravel the enigma surrounding the correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. Employing data sourced from the esteemed National Center for Education Statistics and the font of wisdom known as Wikipedia, we embarked on a journey to unmask the statistical cloak veiling the relationship between 7th-grade student numbers and competitive hotdog consumption. Our ambitious undertaking aimed to shed light on this bewildering alliance and provide a glimpse into the whimsical nature of statistical associations.
While the wry grins and raised eyebrows at the mention of this unusual partnership are entirely justified, our rigorous analysis uncovered a startling revelation. The numbers spoke volumes, or shall we say, shouted with the resonance of a stadium hotdog vendor. The statistical scrutiny yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8136279, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a robust and statistically significant association.
The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of statistical quirkiness, offering a gateway into the whimsical world of junior high demographics and competitive hotdog consumption. As we navigate through the corridors of this eccentric connection, we invite readers to join us in this scholarly escapade, where hilarity and statistical significance intertwine.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In pursuit of unraveling the mysterious alliance between the number of public school students in 7th grade and the consumption of hotdogs by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, our research team embarked on a lively quest that involved meticulous data collection and analysis. The data, spanning the years 1990 to 2022, were primarily gleaned from the National Center for Education Statistics and the relentless fount of knowledge known as Wikipedia.

To facilitate the assembly of the requisite data, we employed a satirical algorithm, affectionately nicknamed the "Hotdog-o-Meter," which scoured the digital landscapes for pertinent information. This algorithm, a hybrid of sophisticated coding and a dash of wry humor, navigated the treacherous terrains of online data repositories to compile an extensive dataset encapsulating the numbers of 7th-grade students in public schools and the exorbitant consumption of hotdogs by the esteemed champion of competitive hotdog devouring.

The data, once corralled, were subjected to a series of arduous statistical analyses, including but not limited to correlation analysis, linear regression, and perhaps the most crucial component – a comprehensive examination of the historical hotdog consumption trends vis-à-vis the fluctuating 7th-grade student population.

Our methodology, while marked by the occasional uproarious escapade into the world of statistical inquiry, rigorously adhered to established statistical protocols and conventions, ensuring the validity and reliability of our findings. In adherence to the principles of empirical inquiry, our methodology employed an eclectic mix of statistical software packages, including SPSS, R, and an obscure, yet oddly fitting, program known as "Wiener-Stats Deluxe."

With the data under scrutiny and the statistical tools at our whimsical disposal, our research team navigated the convoluted labyrinth of numbers and sausages with an unwavering commitment to unraveling the statistical whimsy underlying this improbable association. It is with a mix of academic sobriety and newfound fondness for the unusual that we present the findings of our endeavor, brimming with statistical significance and the unmistakable aroma of scholarly amusement.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 7th grade and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1990 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8136279, r-squared of 0.6619903, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Seventh Grade Sausage Saga: A Statistical Study of Student Numbers and Sausage Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the surprising world of statistical connections between the number of public school students in 7th grade and the consumption of hotdogs by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Unraveling the mystery of this seemingly unrelated pairing, our study utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Wikipedia to analyze the correlation over the years 1990 to 2022. The results yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8136279, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a significant association. Our findings not only provide statistical evidence of this quirky relationship but also offer potential avenues for further investigation into the enigmatic link between junior high demographics and competitive hot dog consumption. Hilarity and statistical significance ensue.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The tantalizing scent of sizzling sausages may not be the first thing that comes to mind when contemplating the intricate webs of statistical analysis. However, the unexpected connection between the number of public school students in 7th grade and the hotdog consumption by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion has piqued the curiosity of researchers and hotdog enthusiasts alike. This unconventional pairing has sparked a trove of statistical inquiries, prompting us to delve into the mysterious realm of hotdogs and adolescent education.
In the grand tradition of statistical sleuthing, our research sought to unravel the enigma surrounding the correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. Employing data sourced from the esteemed National Center for Education Statistics and the font of wisdom known as Wikipedia, we embarked on a journey to unmask the statistical cloak veiling the relationship between 7th-grade student numbers and competitive hotdog consumption. Our ambitious undertaking aimed to shed light on this bewildering alliance and provide a glimpse into the whimsical nature of statistical associations.
While the wry grins and raised eyebrows at the mention of this unusual partnership are entirely justified, our rigorous analysis uncovered a startling revelation. The numbers spoke volumes, or shall we say, shouted with the resonance of a stadium hotdog vendor. The statistical scrutiny yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8136279, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a robust and statistically significant association.
The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of statistical quirkiness, offering a gateway into the whimsical world of junior high demographics and competitive hotdog consumption. As we navigate through the corridors of this eccentric connection, we invite readers to join us in this scholarly escapade, where hilarity and statistical significance intertwine.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between the number of public school students in 7th grade and the hotdog consumption by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion has unveiled an intriguing correlation. Over the period from 1990 to 2022, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8136279, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.6619903, emerged from the statistical cauldron. The p-value of less than 0.01 further cemented the significance of this unexpected association.

Figure 1 illustrates the strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, akin to the synchronicity of hotdog fervor and 7th-grade student numbers. The scatterplot showcases the undeniable link between the two, prompting contemplation on the whims of statistical fate.

The high correlation coefficient suggests a compelling relationship, one that may raise an eyebrow or two, not unlike the quizzical expression of a bystander witnessing a marathon hotdog eating contest. The coalescence of these two ostensibly unrelated phenomena invites a medley of curious inquiries, perhaps beginning with the age-old question: "What do junior high student populations and hotdog consumption have in common?" Our findings beckon further investigation into this playful partnership, offering a tantalizing enigma for the research community to ponder.

The statistical symphony composed by the number of 7th-grade students and the consumption of Nathan's renowned hotdogs evokes an eccentric yet harmonious blend, leaving us to marvel at the lighthearted whims of statistical intrigue. This research has not only unearthed a compelling statistical relationship but also opened the door to a realm of unanticipated connections, where the analytical and the amusing converge in an embrace of delightful absurdity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 7th grade and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Seventh Grade Sausage Saga: A Statistical Study of Student Numbers and Sausage Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the surprising world of statistical connections between the number of public school students in 7th grade and the consumption of hotdogs by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Unraveling the mystery of this seemingly unrelated pairing, our study utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Wikipedia to analyze the correlation over the years 1990 to 2022. The results yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8136279, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a significant association. Our findings not only provide statistical evidence of this quirky relationship but also offer potential avenues for further investigation into the enigmatic link between junior high demographics and competitive hot dog consumption. Hilarity and statistical significance ensue.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several previous studies have delved into the intricate world of statistical oddities and unexpected correlations. Smith (2015) analyzed the consumption patterns of competitive eaters and identified peculiar links between their food intake and seemingly unrelated demographic factors. Doe (2018) investigated the influence of educational trends on unconventional dietary habits, shedding light on the curious interplay between scholastic environments and competitive eating prowess. Similarly, Jones (2020) explored the whimsical relationships between junior high demographics and the gastronomic feats of champion eaters, uncovering a tapestry of statistical curiosities.
Turning to the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Statistical Significance of Sausages" by A. Researcher and B. Analyst (2019) offers a comprehensive overview of unusual correlations in food consumption, providing a glimpse into the surprising world of statistical oddities. Likewise, "Between Buns: A Statistical Study of Sausage Consumption" by C. Statistician (2020) offers a thorough examination of quirky food trends and their inexplicable associations with demographic variables.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, the works of "Sausage Sleuths and Statistical Surprises" by D. Novelist (2016) and "The Mysterious Link: 7th Grade and Hotdog Consumption" by E. Author (2017) present imaginative tales of statistical anomalies and culinary capers, offering a light-hearted take on the peculiar connections between adolescent education and competitive eating.
Furthermore, anecdotal evidence gleaned from social media sources revealed intriguing observations, with users reporting whimsical musings on the correlation between 7th-grade population trends and the voracious appetite of competitive eating champions. One post, in particular, cited the uncanny coincidence of a surge in hotdog consumption coinciding with fluctuations in 7th-grade student numbers, prompting a flurry of lighthearted speculations and comical anecdotes.
The literature, ranging from serious academic works to whimsical fiction and social media anecdotes, offers a diverse tapestry of perspectives on the surprising union between 7th-grade student numbers and hotdog consumption by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. As we plunge into the depths of this statistical journey, the fusion of scholarly findings and humorous insights promises a delightful exploration of this curiously charming correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of public school students in 7th grade and the hotdog consumption by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion has unveiled an intriguing correlation. Over the period from 1990 to 2022, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8136279, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.6619903, emerged from the statistical cauldron. The p-value of less than 0.01 further cemented the significance of this unexpected association.
Figure 1 illustrates the strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, akin to the synchronicity of hotdog fervor and 7th-grade student numbers. The scatterplot showcases the undeniable link between the two, prompting contemplation on the whims of statistical fate.
The high correlation coefficient suggests a compelling relationship, one that may raise an eyebrow or two, not unlike the quizzical expression of a bystander witnessing a marathon hotdog eating contest. The coalescence of these two ostensibly unrelated phenomena invites a medley of curious inquiries, perhaps beginning with the age-old question: "What do junior high student populations and hotdog consumption have in common?" Our findings beckon further investigation into this playful partnership, offering a tantalizing enigma for the research community to ponder.
The statistical symphony composed by the number of 7th-grade students and the consumption of Nathan's renowned hotdogs evokes an eccentric yet harmonious blend, leaving us to marvel at the lighthearted whims of statistical intrigue. This research has not only unearthed a compelling statistical relationship but also opened the door to a realm of unanticipated connections, where the analytical and the amusing converge in an embrace of delightful absurdity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The findings of this study shed light on the remarkable correlation between the number of public school students in 7th grade and the consumption of hotdogs by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Our results provide empirical support for the previous research conducted by Smith (2015), Doe (2018), and Jones (2020), who also explored the whimsical relationships between seemingly unrelated demographic factors and gastronomic feats. These earlier studies not only alluded to the existence of peculiar links but also speculated on the potential influence of educational trends and scholastic environments on competitive eating prowess, themes echoed in our present inquiry.

Furthermore, the literature review delved into the diverse tapestry of perspectives on this unexpected correlation, encompassing serious academic works, whimsical fiction, and even anecdotal evidence from social media sources. The amalgamation of scholarly findings and lighthearted insights promises a delightful exploration of this curiously charming correlation, and our study has certainly added to this colorful mosaic of observations.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8136279, coupled with a significant p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the strength of the association between the number of 7th-grade students and hotdog consumption. This statistical revelation not only broadens our understanding of the enigmatic link between junior high demographics and competitive hot dog consumption but also piques the curiosity of the research community.

The statistical oddity uncovered in this study sparks a medley of curious inquiries, akin to an unexpected burst of laughter at a solemn gathering. The statistical symphony composed by the number of 7th-grade students and the consumption of Nathan's renowned hotdogs evokes an eccentric yet harmonious blend, standing testament to the amusing unpredictability of statistical relationships. Our findings invite further investigation into this playful partnership, offering a tantalizing enigma for the research community to ponder.

In conclusion, the statistical journey undertaken in this study has not only unearthed a compelling and significant relationship but has also enriched the lively tapestry of statistical oddities, where the analytical and the amusing converge in an embrace of delightful absurdity. This correlation, though unexpected, emphasizes the whims of statistical fate, leaving us to marvel at the charming interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 7th grade and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Seventh Grade Sausage Saga: A Statistical Study of Student Numbers and Sausage Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the surprising world of statistical connections between the number of public school students in 7th grade and the consumption of hotdogs by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Unraveling the mystery of this seemingly unrelated pairing, our study utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Wikipedia to analyze the correlation over the years 1990 to 2022. The results yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8136279, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a significant association. Our findings not only provide statistical evidence of this quirky relationship but also offer potential avenues for further investigation into the enigmatic link between junior high demographics and competitive hot dog consumption. Hilarity and statistical significance ensue.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The tantalizing scent of sizzling sausages may not be the first thing that comes to mind when contemplating the intricate webs of statistical analysis. However, the unexpected connection between the number of public school students in 7th grade and the hotdog consumption by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion has piqued the curiosity of researchers and hotdog enthusiasts alike. This unconventional pairing has sparked a trove of statistical inquiries, prompting us to delve into the mysterious realm of hotdogs and adolescent education.
In the grand tradition of statistical sleuthing, our research sought to unravel the enigma surrounding the correlation between these seemingly disparate variables. Employing data sourced from the esteemed National Center for Education Statistics and the font of wisdom known as Wikipedia, we embarked on a journey to unmask the statistical cloak veiling the relationship between 7th-grade student numbers and competitive hotdog consumption. Our ambitious undertaking aimed to shed light on this bewildering alliance and provide a glimpse into the whimsical nature of statistical associations.
While the wry grins and raised eyebrows at the mention of this unusual partnership are entirely justified, our rigorous analysis uncovered a startling revelation. The numbers spoke volumes, or shall we say, shouted with the resonance of a stadium hotdog vendor. The statistical scrutiny yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8136279, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a robust and statistically significant association.
The implications of our findings extend beyond the realm of statistical quirkiness, offering a gateway into the whimsical world of junior high demographics and competitive hotdog consumption. As we navigate through the corridors of this eccentric connection, we invite readers to join us in this scholarly escapade, where hilarity and statistical significance intertwine.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of public school students in 7th grade and the hotdog consumption by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion has unveiled an intriguing correlation. Over the period from 1990 to 2022, a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8136279, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.6619903, emerged from the statistical cauldron. The p-value of less than 0.01 further cemented the significance of this unexpected association.
Figure 1 illustrates the strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, akin to the synchronicity of hotdog fervor and 7th-grade student numbers. The scatterplot showcases the undeniable link between the two, prompting contemplation on the whims of statistical fate.
The high correlation coefficient suggests a compelling relationship, one that may raise an eyebrow or two, not unlike the quizzical expression of a bystander witnessing a marathon hotdog eating contest. The coalescence of these two ostensibly unrelated phenomena invites a medley of curious inquiries, perhaps beginning with the age-old question: "What do junior high student populations and hotdog consumption have in common?" Our findings beckon further investigation into this playful partnership, offering a tantalizing enigma for the research community to ponder.
The statistical symphony composed by the number of 7th-grade students and the consumption of Nathan's renowned hotdogs evokes an eccentric yet harmonious blend, leaving us to marvel at the lighthearted whims of statistical intrigue. This research has not only unearthed a compelling statistical relationship but also opened the door to a realm of unanticipated connections, where the analytical and the amusing converge in an embrace of delightful absurdity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our foray into the unconventional nexus of 7th-grade student numbers and the prodigious consumption of hotdogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has provided a tantalizing glimpse into the idiosyncrasies of statistical analysis. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8136279, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, has cast a spotlight on the whimsical relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Much like the unsuspecting pairing of peanut butter and pickles, this statistical oddity has left us both bemused and enlightened.

As we reflect on the juxtaposition of pre-adolescent education and competitive hotdog devouring, one cannot help but wonder at the capricious dance of statistical fate. The statistical rigidity of our findings, while undoubtedly intriguing, also beckons a chuckle at the unanticipated bonds that weave through the fabric of our numerical landscape.

Our investigation, while shedding light on this curious correlation, also raises a veritable smorgasbord of questions. What unseen forces nudge the consumption of hotdogs in tandem with the number of 7th-grade students? Does statistical fate hold a whimsical sense of humor, akin to a clever play on words? Indeed, the statistical landscape appears to harbor a penchant for the eccentric and the comical, inviting us to ponder the unexpected connections that underpin our numerical world.

With our findings serving as a springboard for further exploration, we must acknowledge the lighthearted nature of this scholarly escapade. The tapestry of statistical inquiry, woven with threads of both sagacity and mirth, implores us to revel in the quirkiness of statistical associations and embrace the disarming charm of the unexpected.

In light of our revelatory findings and the inherent joviality of this scholarly pursuit, we assert that no further research is needed in this peculiar domain. The synergistic blend of statistical gravitas and whimsical delight offered by this investigation stands as a testament to the bountiful surprises that await within the realm of statistical analysis. With a nod to the enigmatic allure of statistical oddities, we bid adieu to this unlikely partnership, marveling at the merry dance of statistical intrigue.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Seventh Grade Sausage Saga: A Statistical Study of Student Numbers and Sausage Consumption. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Adolescent Gastronomy


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Seventh Grade Sausage Saga: A Statistical Study of Student Numbers and Sausage Consumption. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

National Association for the Advancement of Sausage Sciences (NAASS)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Seventh Grade Sausage Saga: A Statistical Study of Student Numbers and Sausage Consumption with an abstract of This research delves into the surprising world of statistical connections between the number of public school students in 7th grade and the consumption of hotdogs by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Unraveling the mystery of this seemingly unrelated pairing, our study utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Wikipedia to analyze the correlation over the years 1990 to 2022. The results yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8136279, with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a significant association. Our findings not only provide statistical evidence of this quirky relationship but also offer potential avenues for further investigation into the enigmatic link between junior high demographics and competitive hot dog consumption. Hilarity and statistical significance ensue.

ChatGPT:

"seventh grade students," "sausage consumption," "statistical study," "hot dog eating competition," "Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion," "correlation coefficient," "junior high demographics," "public school student numbers," "National Center for Education Statistics," "Wikipedia data analysis," "statistical significance," "enigmatic link," "hilarity and statistical significance"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Number of public school students in 7th grade
Detailed data title: 7th grade enrollment in public elementary and secondary schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Number of public school students in 7th grade

Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Detailed data title: Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

Correlation r = 0.8136279 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6619903 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 66.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Number of public school students in 7th grade) over the 33 years from 1990 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.6E-9. 0.0000000085949123648621270000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.81 in 8.6E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 116,347,899 random variables You don't actually need 116 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 32 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 32 because we have two variables measured over a period of 33 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.65, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Number of public school students in 7th grade (Students)306690031810203299060335529034035503422290346395035198003529620354127036293203720470382137038405103818430377715037160803700420365262036413403676310369600037464803747570370974037315503761000377656038485103917820385950037558603663870
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion (Hotdogs eaten)1621.519172019.522.2524.51920.25255050.544.553.334953.7566596854626869616270727471757663




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3066900,3181020,3299060,3355290,3403550,3422290,3463950,3519800,3529620,3541270,3629320,3720470,3821370,3840510,3818430,3777150,3716080,3700420,3652620,3641340,3676310,3696000,3746480,3747570,3709740,3731550,3761000,3776560,3848510,3917820,3859500,3755860,3663870,])
array_2 = np.array([16,21.5,19,17,20,19.5,22.25,24.5,19,20.25,25,50,50.5,44.5,53.33,49,53.75,66,59,68,54,62,68,69,61,62,70,72,74,71,75,76,63,])
array_1_name = "Number of public school students in 7th grade"
array_2_name = "Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 3053 · Black Variable ID: 1304 · Red Variable ID: 500
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0