about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,023 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Athens, Tennessee and the second variable is Wind power generated in Puerto Rico.  The chart goes from 2010 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The air pollution in Athens, Tennessee was so potent that it created a new form of turbocharged air currents. These pollution-powered winds of change inadvertently bolstered the wind power generation in Puerto Rico, blowing a breath of fresh energy into the industry. It seems the smog in Tennessee really knew how to 're-volt' against the status quo and 'amp' up the wind production in Puerto Rico!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Create an image of a polluted city skyline in Athens, Tennessee, being overshadowed by smog, while in Puerto Rico, towering wind turbines stand against a clear blue sky. The turbines' blades are turning in the wind, symbolizing the shift towards clean energy amidst the pollution in Athens. The focus should be on the contrast between the polluted city and the clean, renewable energy source. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind power generated in Puerto Rico. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Voxel art Futuristic Low poly Concept art High-tech
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind power generated in Puerto Rico, in the following situation: Because the smog in Athens, Tennessee caused a surge in demand for clean energy, Puerto Rico had to ramp up their wind power production to meet the unexpected order of giant wind turbines from the mainland.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Athens, Tennessee, a hazy skyline is overtaken by smog, with thick, polluted air hanging over the city. In contrast, in Puerto Rico, rows of towering wind turbines stand against a clear blue sky, their massive blades turning in the wind to generate clean energy. Amidst the pollution in Athens, the demand for wind power has led to an increase in the production of wind turbines in Puerto Rico, symbolizing the shift towards cleaner energy sources.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In Athens, Tennessee, a hazy skyline is overtaken by smog, with thick, polluted air hanging over the city. In contrast, in Puerto Rico, rows of towering wind turbines stand against a clear blue sky, their massive blades turning in the wind to generate clean energy. Amidst the pollution in Athens, the demand for wind power has led to an increase in the production of wind turbines in Puerto Rico, symbolizing the shift towards cleaner energy sources. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Create an image of a polluted city skyline in Athens, Tennessee, being overshadowed by smog, while in Puerto Rico, towering wind turbines stand against a clear blue sky. The turbines' blades are turning in the wind, symbolizing the shift towards clean energy amidst the pollution in Athens. The focus should be on the contrast between the polluted city and the clean, renewable energy source.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Athens, Tennessee caused Wind power generated in Puerto Rico to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Blowing in the Wind: A Rhyme and Reason Study of Air Pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind Power in Puerto Rico.

The Journal of Ecological Harmony and Sustainable Solutions

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind power generated in Puerto Rico. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9341646 and p < 0.01 for 2010 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: A Rhyme and Reason Study of Air Pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind Power in Puerto Rico."

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee and the generation of wind power in the sunny shores of Puerto Rico. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration, we discovered a significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors. The correlation coefficient of 0.9341646 and p < 0.01, spanning from 2010 to 2021, yielded astonishment among our research team. At first glance, one might quip that this connection is as incongruous as a snowman in the desert, but our findings challenge such notions. Our analysis unveils the delightful twist of fate whereby the winds of change in Puerto Rico appear to influence the atmospheric harmony in Athens, Tennessee. We invite fellow scholars to join us in this whimsical dance of data analysis, as we uncover the delightful serendipity within the realm of environmental and energy studies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind power generated in Puerto Rico. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: A Rhyme and Reason Study of Air Pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind Power in Puerto Rico."

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee and the generation of wind power in the sunny shores of Puerto Rico. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration, we discovered a significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors. The correlation coefficient of 0.9341646 and p < 0.01, spanning from 2010 to 2021, yielded astonishment among our research team. At first glance, one might quip that this connection is as incongruous as a snowman in the desert, but our findings challenge such notions. Our analysis unveils the delightful twist of fate whereby the winds of change in Puerto Rico appear to influence the atmospheric harmony in Athens, Tennessee. We invite fellow scholars to join us in this whimsical dance of data analysis, as we uncover the delightful serendipity within the realm of environmental and energy studies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

It is a truth universally acknowledged that clean air and renewable energy are the cornerstones of a sustainable future. The pursuit of understanding the intricate interplay between environmental factors and energy sources has led researchers down many a windy path. In this paper, we present the results of our investigation into the unexpected relationship between air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee, and the generation of wind power in the sultry environs of Puerto Rico. This research aims to shed light on the whimsical dance that seems to be playing out between these two seemingly disparate variables.

As we delved into this study, we could not help but marvel at the curiosity of the universe which led us to scrutinize these particular data sets. Like scientists on a scavenger hunt, we pored over the meticulous records from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, hoping to uncover correlations as intriguing as a chemical reaction in a laboratory.

At first glance, one might be forgiven for thinking that the connection between air pollution in Tennessee and wind power in Puerto Rico is about as logical as a square wheel on a bicycle. However, our analysis has unearthed a correlation coefficient so striking that even the most skeptical statistician might raise an eyebrow in surprise.

As we embark on this scientific odyssey, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in the absurdity of this juxtaposition, and perhaps, find joy in the unexpected patterns that emerge from the data. For, as Albert Einstein aptly quipped, "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science."

Stay tuned as we unravel the delightful riddle that is the connection between air pollution and wind power – the winds of change have never blown quite so unexpectedly!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind power generated in Puerto Rico. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: A Rhyme and Reason Study of Air Pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind Power in Puerto Rico."

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee and the generation of wind power in the sunny shores of Puerto Rico. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration, we discovered a significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors. The correlation coefficient of 0.9341646 and p < 0.01, spanning from 2010 to 2021, yielded astonishment among our research team. At first glance, one might quip that this connection is as incongruous as a snowman in the desert, but our findings challenge such notions. Our analysis unveils the delightful twist of fate whereby the winds of change in Puerto Rico appear to influence the atmospheric harmony in Athens, Tennessee. We invite fellow scholars to join us in this whimsical dance of data analysis, as we uncover the delightful serendipity within the realm of environmental and energy studies.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
It is a truth universally acknowledged that clean air and renewable energy are the cornerstones of a sustainable future. The pursuit of understanding the intricate interplay between environmental factors and energy sources has led researchers down many a windy path. In this paper, we present the results of our investigation into the unexpected relationship between air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee, and the generation of wind power in the sultry environs of Puerto Rico. This research aims to shed light on the whimsical dance that seems to be playing out between these two seemingly disparate variables.
As we delved into this study, we could not help but marvel at the curiosity of the universe which led us to scrutinize these particular data sets. Like scientists on a scavenger hunt, we pored over the meticulous records from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, hoping to uncover correlations as intriguing as a chemical reaction in a laboratory.
At first glance, one might be forgiven for thinking that the connection between air pollution in Tennessee and wind power in Puerto Rico is about as logical as a square wheel on a bicycle. However, our analysis has unearthed a correlation coefficient so striking that even the most skeptical statistician might raise an eyebrow in surprise.
As we embark on this scientific odyssey, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in the absurdity of this juxtaposition, and perhaps, find joy in the unexpected patterns that emerge from the data. For, as Albert Einstein aptly quipped, "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science."
Stay tuned as we unravel the delightful riddle that is the connection between air pollution and wind power – the winds of change have never blown quite so unexpectedly!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature on air pollution and wind power is as vast and varied as the gusts that sweep across the landscape. Smith et al. (2018) delved into the complex relationship between atmospheric pollutants and renewable energy sources, offering a comprehensive analysis of air quality in urban settings. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2020) explored the socioeconomic implications of wind power adoption in coastal regions, highlighting the potential for sustainable development in the face of environmental challenges.

Turning to non-fiction works, "The Windup Girl" by Paolo Bacigalupi provides a dystopian vision of a world ravaged by climate change, where air pollution and energy scarcity take center stage in a cautionary tale for the ages. On a lighter note, "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell offers a romantic backdrop against the tumultuous historical setting of the American South, where the winds of change echo the ever-shifting tides of progress.

In the world of fiction, the whimsical realms of Dr. Seuss and "The Wind in the Willows" by Kenneth Grahame beckon with their enchanting tales of nature's mysteries and the adventures that unfold amidst the breeze. As we sail through the seas of literature, it becomes clear that the winds of storytelling can carry us to unforeseen destinations, much like the unexpected connections we have uncovered in our research.

In our pursuit of a deeper understanding of this unorthodox correlation, we have also ventured into the animated world of children's shows. The classic "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" offers a reminder of the interconnectedness of environmental phenomena, albeit with a generous dose of superhero flair. Additionally, the enigmatic allure of the "Magic School Bus" takes us on a journey through the elements, eliciting both nostalgia and a renewed sense of wonder at the intricacies of the natural world.

As we navigate the sea of literature and popular culture, it is evident that the winds of curiosity continue to sweep us into unforeseen realms of inquiry and amusement. Join us, dear reader, as we unfurl the sails of knowledge and embark on a scholarly adventure unlike any other. For in the realm of academia, as in the windswept landscapes of our study, the unexpected can often yield the most delightful discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind power generated in Puerto Rico. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2010 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: A Rhyme and Reason Study of Air Pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind Power in Puerto Rico."

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee and the generation of wind power in the sunny shores of Puerto Rico. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration, we discovered a significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors. The correlation coefficient of 0.9341646 and p < 0.01, spanning from 2010 to 2021, yielded astonishment among our research team. At first glance, one might quip that this connection is as incongruous as a snowman in the desert, but our findings challenge such notions. Our analysis unveils the delightful twist of fate whereby the winds of change in Puerto Rico appear to influence the atmospheric harmony in Athens, Tennessee. We invite fellow scholars to join us in this whimsical dance of data analysis, as we uncover the delightful serendipity within the realm of environmental and energy studies.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
It is a truth universally acknowledged that clean air and renewable energy are the cornerstones of a sustainable future. The pursuit of understanding the intricate interplay between environmental factors and energy sources has led researchers down many a windy path. In this paper, we present the results of our investigation into the unexpected relationship between air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee, and the generation of wind power in the sultry environs of Puerto Rico. This research aims to shed light on the whimsical dance that seems to be playing out between these two seemingly disparate variables.
As we delved into this study, we could not help but marvel at the curiosity of the universe which led us to scrutinize these particular data sets. Like scientists on a scavenger hunt, we pored over the meticulous records from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, hoping to uncover correlations as intriguing as a chemical reaction in a laboratory.
At first glance, one might be forgiven for thinking that the connection between air pollution in Tennessee and wind power in Puerto Rico is about as logical as a square wheel on a bicycle. However, our analysis has unearthed a correlation coefficient so striking that even the most skeptical statistician might raise an eyebrow in surprise.
As we embark on this scientific odyssey, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in the absurdity of this juxtaposition, and perhaps, find joy in the unexpected patterns that emerge from the data. For, as Albert Einstein aptly quipped, "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science."
Stay tuned as we unravel the delightful riddle that is the connection between air pollution and wind power – the winds of change have never blown quite so unexpectedly!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the enigmatic link between air pollution in Athens, Tennessee, and the generation of wind power in Puerto Rico, our research team embarked on a whimsical journey through the convoluted labyrinth of data collection and analysis. Armed with an arsenal of statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism, we navigated through the treacherous terrain of online databases, drawing primarily from the bountiful repositories of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration.

Our data collection process resembled a peculiar modern-day treasure hunt, as we scoured the digital landscape for nuggets of environmental and energy-related information spanning the years 2010 to 2021. Like intrepid explorers charting new territories, we meticulously documented air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee, and wind power generation in Puerto Rico, casting our net wide to capture the essence of these disparate yet curiously intertwined variables.

Applying the principles of robust statistical analysis, we deftly manipulated the treasure trove of data to unveil the hidden patterns and correlations that lay dormant within. Utilizing a combination of correlation analysis and regression modeling, we probed the depths of our dataset, teasing out the perplexing relationship between air pollution and wind power with the precision of a surgical scalpel and the whimsy of a magician's sleight of hand.

As we waded through the data with the tenacity of a detective on the trail of a cunning culprit, we held a firm gaze on the overarching goal of unearthing the unexpected ties between these contrasting variables. Armed with an array of statistical tests and diagnostic checks, we navigated the convoluted pathways of hypothesis testing and significance analysis, ensuring that our findings withstood the rigorous scrutiny of the scientific community.

In the spirit of scientific inquiry, we approached our methodology with equal parts rigor and merriment, recognizing that the pursuit of knowledge is as much a delightful adventure as it is a steadfast pursuit of truth. With a twinkle in our eyes and a savvy nod to the whimsical nature of our study, we set forth on this merry dance through the world of data analysis, weaving a tapestry of statistical wizardry and scientific curiosity as we unfurled the enchanting saga of air pollution and wind power.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind power generated in Puerto Rico. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2010 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9341646, r-squared of 0.8726634, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: A Rhyme and Reason Study of Air Pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind Power in Puerto Rico."

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee and the generation of wind power in the sunny shores of Puerto Rico. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration, we discovered a significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors. The correlation coefficient of 0.9341646 and p < 0.01, spanning from 2010 to 2021, yielded astonishment among our research team. At first glance, one might quip that this connection is as incongruous as a snowman in the desert, but our findings challenge such notions. Our analysis unveils the delightful twist of fate whereby the winds of change in Puerto Rico appear to influence the atmospheric harmony in Athens, Tennessee. We invite fellow scholars to join us in this whimsical dance of data analysis, as we uncover the delightful serendipity within the realm of environmental and energy studies.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
It is a truth universally acknowledged that clean air and renewable energy are the cornerstones of a sustainable future. The pursuit of understanding the intricate interplay between environmental factors and energy sources has led researchers down many a windy path. In this paper, we present the results of our investigation into the unexpected relationship between air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee, and the generation of wind power in the sultry environs of Puerto Rico. This research aims to shed light on the whimsical dance that seems to be playing out between these two seemingly disparate variables.
As we delved into this study, we could not help but marvel at the curiosity of the universe which led us to scrutinize these particular data sets. Like scientists on a scavenger hunt, we pored over the meticulous records from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, hoping to uncover correlations as intriguing as a chemical reaction in a laboratory.
At first glance, one might be forgiven for thinking that the connection between air pollution in Tennessee and wind power in Puerto Rico is about as logical as a square wheel on a bicycle. However, our analysis has unearthed a correlation coefficient so striking that even the most skeptical statistician might raise an eyebrow in surprise.
As we embark on this scientific odyssey, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in the absurdity of this juxtaposition, and perhaps, find joy in the unexpected patterns that emerge from the data. For, as Albert Einstein aptly quipped, "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science."
Stay tuned as we unravel the delightful riddle that is the connection between air pollution and wind power – the winds of change have never blown quite so unexpectedly!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9341646, with an r-squared value of 0.8726634 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee, and wind power generation in Puerto Rico.

To illustrate this unexpected connection, we present a scatterplot (Fig. 1) that vividly depicts the striking correlation between the two variables. The scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the surprising harmony between air pollution and wind power generation, as if they were dancing a tango across the graph.

The strength of the correlation left our research team in awe, akin to stumbling upon a unicorn in a forest of statistical analyses. The results challenge traditional scientific assumptions and invite us to ponder the intricate interplay between seemingly unrelated environmental and energy factors. It's as if Mother Nature herself penned a whimsical script, casting these variables in a peculiar yet delightful duet throughout the years 2010 to 2021.

The robust correlation coefficient and striking level of significance speak to the serendipitous dance of data points, reminiscent of a delightful symphony that defies conventional wisdom. As the great Carl Sagan once said, "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known." In our case, it seems that the incredible was a harmonious tango between air pollution and wind power generation, waiting patiently to be discovered amidst the vast expanse of data.

Indeed, the winds of change have blown in a most unexpected direction, and our findings indicate that we have merely scratched the surface of the enigmatic relationship between these two disparate variables. This delightful conundrum continues to beckon curious minds and invites further exploration into the marvelous mysteries that unfold within the realm of environmental and energy studies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind power generated in Puerto Rico. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: A Rhyme and Reason Study of Air Pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind Power in Puerto Rico."

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee and the generation of wind power in the sunny shores of Puerto Rico. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration, we discovered a significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors. The correlation coefficient of 0.9341646 and p < 0.01, spanning from 2010 to 2021, yielded astonishment among our research team. At first glance, one might quip that this connection is as incongruous as a snowman in the desert, but our findings challenge such notions. Our analysis unveils the delightful twist of fate whereby the winds of change in Puerto Rico appear to influence the atmospheric harmony in Athens, Tennessee. We invite fellow scholars to join us in this whimsical dance of data analysis, as we uncover the delightful serendipity within the realm of environmental and energy studies.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature on air pollution and wind power is as vast and varied as the gusts that sweep across the landscape. Smith et al. (2018) delved into the complex relationship between atmospheric pollutants and renewable energy sources, offering a comprehensive analysis of air quality in urban settings. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2020) explored the socioeconomic implications of wind power adoption in coastal regions, highlighting the potential for sustainable development in the face of environmental challenges.
Turning to non-fiction works, "The Windup Girl" by Paolo Bacigalupi provides a dystopian vision of a world ravaged by climate change, where air pollution and energy scarcity take center stage in a cautionary tale for the ages. On a lighter note, "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell offers a romantic backdrop against the tumultuous historical setting of the American South, where the winds of change echo the ever-shifting tides of progress.
In the world of fiction, the whimsical realms of Dr. Seuss and "The Wind in the Willows" by Kenneth Grahame beckon with their enchanting tales of nature's mysteries and the adventures that unfold amidst the breeze. As we sail through the seas of literature, it becomes clear that the winds of storytelling can carry us to unforeseen destinations, much like the unexpected connections we have uncovered in our research.
In our pursuit of a deeper understanding of this unorthodox correlation, we have also ventured into the animated world of children's shows. The classic "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" offers a reminder of the interconnectedness of environmental phenomena, albeit with a generous dose of superhero flair. Additionally, the enigmatic allure of the "Magic School Bus" takes us on a journey through the elements, eliciting both nostalgia and a renewed sense of wonder at the intricacies of the natural world.
As we navigate the sea of literature and popular culture, it is evident that the winds of curiosity continue to sweep us into unforeseen realms of inquiry and amusement. Join us, dear reader, as we unfurl the sails of knowledge and embark on a scholarly adventure unlike any other. For in the realm of academia, as in the windswept landscapes of our study, the unexpected can often yield the most delightful discoveries.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9341646, with an r-squared value of 0.8726634 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee, and wind power generation in Puerto Rico.
To illustrate this unexpected connection, we present a scatterplot (Fig. 1) that vividly depicts the striking correlation between the two variables. The scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the surprising harmony between air pollution and wind power generation, as if they were dancing a tango across the graph.
The strength of the correlation left our research team in awe, akin to stumbling upon a unicorn in a forest of statistical analyses. The results challenge traditional scientific assumptions and invite us to ponder the intricate interplay between seemingly unrelated environmental and energy factors. It's as if Mother Nature herself penned a whimsical script, casting these variables in a peculiar yet delightful duet throughout the years 2010 to 2021.
The robust correlation coefficient and striking level of significance speak to the serendipitous dance of data points, reminiscent of a delightful symphony that defies conventional wisdom. As the great Carl Sagan once said, "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known." In our case, it seems that the incredible was a harmonious tango between air pollution and wind power generation, waiting patiently to be discovered amidst the vast expanse of data.
Indeed, the winds of change have blown in a most unexpected direction, and our findings indicate that we have merely scratched the surface of the enigmatic relationship between these two disparate variables. This delightful conundrum continues to beckon curious minds and invites further exploration into the marvelous mysteries that unfold within the realm of environmental and energy studies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study provide a whimsical twist in the realm of environmental and energy studies, akin to stumbling upon a unicorn in a forest of statistical analyses. The significant correlation between air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee, and wind power generation in Puerto Rico beckons us to reconsider traditional scientific assumptions and embrace the unexpected interplay between seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings echo the sentiment of the great Carl Sagan, who famously remarked, "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known." In our case, this incredible discovery took the form of a harmonious tango between air pollution and wind power generation, waiting patiently to be uncovered within the vast expanse of data.

Our study builds upon the existing literature on air pollution and wind power, shedding light on the delightful serendipity within this unorthodox correlation. Much like the cautionary tale in Paolo Bacigalupi's "The Windup Girl," our findings serve as a reminder of the intricate interconnectedness of environmental phenomena. The winds of storytelling, as depicted in Margaret Mitchell's "Gone with the Wind" and Dr. Seuss's whimsical tales, have carried us to unforeseen destinations and sparked a renewed sense of wonder at the mysteries of the natural world. In the words of "The Wind in the Willows" by Kenneth Grahame, we have ventured into the charming realm of unexpected inquiry and amusement, unfurling the sails of knowledge on a scholarly adventure unlike any other.

In conclusion, our study invites fellow scholars to join us in this delightful dance of data analysis, as we continue to uncover the marvelous mysteries that unfold within the realm of environmental and energy studies. The unexpected connections we have unearthed serve as a testament to the resilience and ingenuity of nature, where the winds of change blow in the most unexpected directions, and the most delightful discoveries await the curious minds of researchers. As we embark on this scholarly voyage, we are reminded that in the whimsical landscapes of our study, as in the unpredictable winds of fate, true marvels often arise from the most improbable of sources.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind power generated in Puerto Rico. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: A Rhyme and Reason Study of Air Pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind Power in Puerto Rico."

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee and the generation of wind power in the sunny shores of Puerto Rico. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration, we discovered a significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors. The correlation coefficient of 0.9341646 and p < 0.01, spanning from 2010 to 2021, yielded astonishment among our research team. At first glance, one might quip that this connection is as incongruous as a snowman in the desert, but our findings challenge such notions. Our analysis unveils the delightful twist of fate whereby the winds of change in Puerto Rico appear to influence the atmospheric harmony in Athens, Tennessee. We invite fellow scholars to join us in this whimsical dance of data analysis, as we uncover the delightful serendipity within the realm of environmental and energy studies.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
It is a truth universally acknowledged that clean air and renewable energy are the cornerstones of a sustainable future. The pursuit of understanding the intricate interplay between environmental factors and energy sources has led researchers down many a windy path. In this paper, we present the results of our investigation into the unexpected relationship between air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee, and the generation of wind power in the sultry environs of Puerto Rico. This research aims to shed light on the whimsical dance that seems to be playing out between these two seemingly disparate variables.
As we delved into this study, we could not help but marvel at the curiosity of the universe which led us to scrutinize these particular data sets. Like scientists on a scavenger hunt, we pored over the meticulous records from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, hoping to uncover correlations as intriguing as a chemical reaction in a laboratory.
At first glance, one might be forgiven for thinking that the connection between air pollution in Tennessee and wind power in Puerto Rico is about as logical as a square wheel on a bicycle. However, our analysis has unearthed a correlation coefficient so striking that even the most skeptical statistician might raise an eyebrow in surprise.
As we embark on this scientific odyssey, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in the absurdity of this juxtaposition, and perhaps, find joy in the unexpected patterns that emerge from the data. For, as Albert Einstein aptly quipped, "The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science."
Stay tuned as we unravel the delightful riddle that is the connection between air pollution and wind power – the winds of change have never blown quite so unexpectedly!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9341646, with an r-squared value of 0.8726634 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee, and wind power generation in Puerto Rico.
To illustrate this unexpected connection, we present a scatterplot (Fig. 1) that vividly depicts the striking correlation between the two variables. The scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the surprising harmony between air pollution and wind power generation, as if they were dancing a tango across the graph.
The strength of the correlation left our research team in awe, akin to stumbling upon a unicorn in a forest of statistical analyses. The results challenge traditional scientific assumptions and invite us to ponder the intricate interplay between seemingly unrelated environmental and energy factors. It's as if Mother Nature herself penned a whimsical script, casting these variables in a peculiar yet delightful duet throughout the years 2010 to 2021.
The robust correlation coefficient and striking level of significance speak to the serendipitous dance of data points, reminiscent of a delightful symphony that defies conventional wisdom. As the great Carl Sagan once said, "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known." In our case, it seems that the incredible was a harmonious tango between air pollution and wind power generation, waiting patiently to be discovered amidst the vast expanse of data.
Indeed, the winds of change have blown in a most unexpected direction, and our findings indicate that we have merely scratched the surface of the enigmatic relationship between these two disparate variables. This delightful conundrum continues to beckon curious minds and invites further exploration into the marvelous mysteries that unfold within the realm of environmental and energy studies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has brought to light the enchanting relationship between air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee, and wind power generation in Puerto Rico. The statistical significance of the correlation coefficient has left us as surprised as a black cat in a room full of rocking chairs. Our findings hint at a harmonious dance between these two seemingly unrelated variables, akin to a fusion of salsa and bluegrass music. It appears that the winds of change in Puerto Rico have orchestrated an atmospheric waltz with the pollution particles in Athens, Tennessee, in a display that even the most discerning data analyst might find as delightful as finding an elusive four-leaf clover.

Our analysis has not only challenged traditional scientific assumptions but also provided a whimsical twist in the oftentimes serious realm of environmental and energy studies. As we bid adieu to this captivating research, it is with a heavy heart that we declare no further investigation is needed in this area, for we have truly unraveled the perplexing riddle of air pollution and wind power generation. It's as if the universe has bestowed upon us a memorable Da Vinci painting, capturing the beauty and absurdity of nature's intricate workings. With that said, let us raise our beakers and rejoice in this scientific adventure, for as Sir Isaac Newton once mused, "I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people." And in this case, we have certainly been witness to the delightful madness of data. Cheers to the winds of change and the charming quirks of scientific exploration!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blowing in the Wind: A Rhyme and Reason Study of Air Pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind Power in Puerto Rico.. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Harmony and Sustainable Solutions


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blowing in the Wind: A Rhyme and Reason Study of Air Pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind Power in Puerto Rico.. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Environmental Advancements and Renewable Technologies (SEART)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blowing in the Wind: A Rhyme and Reason Study of Air Pollution in Athens, Tennessee and Wind Power in Puerto Rico. with an abstract of In this study, we examine the intriguing relationship between air pollution levels in Athens, Tennessee and the generation of wind power in the sunny shores of Puerto Rico. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration, we discovered a significant correlation between these seemingly unrelated factors. The correlation coefficient of 0.9341646 and p < 0.01, spanning from 2010 to 2021, yielded astonishment among our research team. At first glance, one might quip that this connection is as incongruous as a snowman in the desert, but our findings challenge such notions. Our analysis unveils the delightful twist of fate whereby the winds of change in Puerto Rico appear to influence the atmospheric harmony in Athens, Tennessee. We invite fellow scholars to join us in this whimsical dance of data analysis, as we uncover the delightful serendipity within the realm of environmental and energy studies.

ChatGPT:

Air pollution, wind power, Athens Tennessee, Puerto Rico, environmental data analysis, EPA data, EIA data, correlation studies, atmospheric harmony

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Athens, Tennessee
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Athens, TN
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Athens, Tennessee

Wind power generated in Puerto Rico
Detailed data title: Total wind power generated in Puerto Rico in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in Puerto Rico

Correlation r = 0.9341646 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8726634 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 87.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Wind power generated in Puerto Rico) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Athens, Tennessee) over the 12 years from 2010 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.7E-6. 0.0000087154480593162710000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 0.00087% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 114,739 random variables You don't actually need 114 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.78, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in Athens, Tennessee (Bad air quality days)0.002832860.002793300.190.1501830.1636360.1512610.1447960.112360.1148460.08659220.133333
Wind power generated in Puerto Rico (Billion kWh)0.0010.0010.0150.1730.2180.2390.1930.1490.1080.1590.1430.162554




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.00283286,0.0027933,0,0.19,0.150183,0.163636,0.151261,0.144796,0.11236,0.114846,0.0865922,0.133333,])
array_2 = np.array([0.001,0.001,0.015,0.173,0.218,0.239,0.193,0.149,0.108,0.159,0.143,0.162554,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Athens, Tennessee"
array_2_name = "Wind power generated in Puerto Rico"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 3023 · Black Variable ID: 21720 · Red Variable ID: 23910
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0