about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,016 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Jonah and the second variable is The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

The name Jonah became a hit, leading to a rise in demand for everything ocean-related, including seafood. This sparked a sudden fascination with marine biology in Idaho, causing a surge in the need for nursing instructors and teachers to school the next wave of aquatic enthusiasts. It looks like the name Jonah really made some "waves" in Idaho's education system.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image of a classroom in Idaho, featuring a group of nursing instructors and teachers gathered around a large chart. The chart shows the increase in popularity of the first name Jonah. In the background, a poster of a whale hangs on the wall, reflecting the newfound interest in marine life. The visual includes subtle elements indicating the growing fascination with maritime culture, such as a speaker playing sea shanties. The instructors are depicted preparing to expand their curriculum to include more material about whales and maritime medicine in response to the changing interests of their students. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Jonah and The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Photorealism Symbolism
ChatGPT: Symbolism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Jonah and The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho, in the following situation: The changes in popularity of the first name Jonah caused the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho to increase. As the name Jonah gained popularity, it led to a rise in the demand for whale-related knowledge among Idahoans, thereby prompting the need for more nursing instructors and teachers to educate the public on the proper care and treatment of underwater creatures. The influx of Jonahs also coincided with a surge in the popularity of sea shanties, which in turn sparked an interest in maritime medicine, further driving the need for more educators in the nursing field. Thus, the name Jonah's ascent in popularity had a whale of an impact on the teaching landscape in Idaho.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a classroom in Idaho, a group of nursing instructors and teachers gather around a large chart showing the increase in popularity of the first name Jonah. Nearby, a poster of a whale hangs on the wall, reflecting the newfound interest in marine life. The sounds of sea shanties can be heard from a nearby speaker, indicating the growing fascination with maritime culture. The instructors prepare to expand their curriculum to include more material about whales and maritime medicine, in response to the changing interests of their students.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Symbolism ] and depicting this scene: In a classroom in Idaho, a group of nursing instructors and teachers gather around a large chart showing the increase in popularity of the first name Jonah. Nearby, a poster of a whale hangs on the wall, reflecting the newfound interest in marine life. The sounds of sea shanties can be heard from a nearby speaker, indicating the growing fascination with maritime culture. The instructors prepare to expand their curriculum to include more material about whales and maritime medicine, in response to the changing interests of their students. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image of a classroom in Idaho, featuring a group of nursing instructors and teachers gathered around a large chart. The chart shows the increase in popularity of the first name Jonah. In the background, a poster of a whale hangs on the wall, reflecting the newfound interest in marine life. The visual includes subtle elements indicating the growing fascination with maritime culture, such as a speaker playing sea shanties. The instructors are depicted preparing to expand their curriculum to include more material about whales and maritime medicine in response to the changing interests of their students.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Jonah caused The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Nurse-ing Jonah: A Whale of a Tale of Names and Numbers in Idaho

The Journal of Marine Mammal Medicine and Mythology

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jonah and The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8959117 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Nurse-ing Jonah: A Whale of a Tale of Names and Numbers in Idaho"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the popularity of the first name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho. Our research team, armed with census data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, set out to answer the age-old question: does the name Jonah lure in more educators to the nursing field, or is it all just a fishy coincidence?

Analyzing data from 2003 to 2018, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8959117 and p < 0.01, prompting us to exclaim, "Well, blow me down!" The evidence suggests that there may be something more to the name Jonah than meets the eye, or should we say nursing scrubs?

While it's tempting to say that this correlation is as clear as the call of a captain to his crew, further research is needed to untangle the complexity of this curious connection. One thing's for sure, though: when it comes to naming future healthcare providers, it seems that Jonah has a whale of an influence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jonah and The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Nurse-ing Jonah: A Whale of a Tale of Names and Numbers in Idaho"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the popularity of the first name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho. Our research team, armed with census data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, set out to answer the age-old question: does the name Jonah lure in more educators to the nursing field, or is it all just a fishy coincidence?

Analyzing data from 2003 to 2018, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8959117 and p < 0.01, prompting us to exclaim, "Well, blow me down!" The evidence suggests that there may be something more to the name Jonah than meets the eye, or should we say nursing scrubs?

While it's tempting to say that this correlation is as clear as the call of a captain to his crew, further research is needed to untangle the complexity of this curious connection. One thing's for sure, though: when it comes to naming future healthcare providers, it seems that Jonah has a whale of an influence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Much like the legendary tale of Jonah and the whale, our study plunges into the depths of an equally captivating mystery - the relationship between the popularity of the name 'Jonah' and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in the state of Idaho. While some might think this topic is a mere fish story, we are determined to uncover the truth lurking beneath the waves of data and statistics.

Now, before you start thinking we've gone off the deep end with this research, let's cast our nets wide and bask in the glory of some data-driven humor. Why did the researcher go to art school? Because he wanted to draw his own conclusions. Science may be our passion, but we never miss an opportunity for a bit of scholarly silliness.

As we embark on this academic voyage, let's take a moment to appreciate the serious side of our investigation. The fascination with the name Jonah stems from religious and cultural significance, but could it also be linked to the noble profession of nursing education? Our curiosity is as insatiable as a sea monster's appetite, driving us to explore this enigmatic correlation with all the rigor of a dedicated scholarly crew.

Before we dive into the statistical depths, let's reel in a quick dad joke: Why did the statistician go to therapy? Because he had too many unresolved issues. We firmly believe that a little levity can keep our minds afloat in a sea of numbers and hypotheses.

Fueled by the fervor for discovery, we embrace the challenge of unraveling the twining threads of chance and causation. Our journey will navigate the treacherous waters of independent and dependent variables, steering us toward the promised land of empirical insight. With our compass set to the north star of scientific inquiry, we aim to chart a course that even Captain Ahab would commend.

Now, hold on to your scientific hats as we embark on a voyage that might just make a big splash in the world of interdisciplinary research. Join us as we examine the ebb and flow of data, riding the waves of discovery and knowledge. As we navigate the tempest of information, we invite you to stay afloat with us and partake in the surprising revelations that await.

So, with all puns intended, let's set sail towards uncovering the deep-sea secrets of the name 'Jonah' and its peculiar connection to the world of nursing education. As the saying goes, "Water" we waiting for? Let's navigate the choppy waters of empirical investigation and uncover the hidden currents that bind names and numbers in the realm of academia.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jonah and The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Nurse-ing Jonah: A Whale of a Tale of Names and Numbers in Idaho"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the popularity of the first name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho. Our research team, armed with census data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, set out to answer the age-old question: does the name Jonah lure in more educators to the nursing field, or is it all just a fishy coincidence?

Analyzing data from 2003 to 2018, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8959117 and p < 0.01, prompting us to exclaim, "Well, blow me down!" The evidence suggests that there may be something more to the name Jonah than meets the eye, or should we say nursing scrubs?

While it's tempting to say that this correlation is as clear as the call of a captain to his crew, further research is needed to untangle the complexity of this curious connection. One thing's for sure, though: when it comes to naming future healthcare providers, it seems that Jonah has a whale of an influence.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Much like the legendary tale of Jonah and the whale, our study plunges into the depths of an equally captivating mystery - the relationship between the popularity of the name 'Jonah' and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in the state of Idaho. While some might think this topic is a mere fish story, we are determined to uncover the truth lurking beneath the waves of data and statistics.
Now, before you start thinking we've gone off the deep end with this research, let's cast our nets wide and bask in the glory of some data-driven humor. Why did the researcher go to art school? Because he wanted to draw his own conclusions. Science may be our passion, but we never miss an opportunity for a bit of scholarly silliness.
As we embark on this academic voyage, let's take a moment to appreciate the serious side of our investigation. The fascination with the name Jonah stems from religious and cultural significance, but could it also be linked to the noble profession of nursing education? Our curiosity is as insatiable as a sea monster's appetite, driving us to explore this enigmatic correlation with all the rigor of a dedicated scholarly crew.
Before we dive into the statistical depths, let's reel in a quick dad joke: Why did the statistician go to therapy? Because he had too many unresolved issues. We firmly believe that a little levity can keep our minds afloat in a sea of numbers and hypotheses.
Fueled by the fervor for discovery, we embrace the challenge of unraveling the twining threads of chance and causation. Our journey will navigate the treacherous waters of independent and dependent variables, steering us toward the promised land of empirical insight. With our compass set to the north star of scientific inquiry, we aim to chart a course that even Captain Ahab would commend.
Now, hold on to your scientific hats as we embark on a voyage that might just make a big splash in the world of interdisciplinary research. Join us as we examine the ebb and flow of data, riding the waves of discovery and knowledge. As we navigate the tempest of information, we invite you to stay afloat with us and partake in the surprising revelations that await.
So, with all puns intended, let's set sail towards uncovering the deep-sea secrets of the name 'Jonah' and its peculiar connection to the world of nursing education. As the saying goes, "Water" we waiting for? Let's navigate the choppy waters of empirical investigation and uncover the hidden currents that bind names and numbers in the realm of academia.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between names and professional career choices has been a subject of fascination and intrigue for researchers across various disciplines. Smith et al. (2010) expound on the psychological implications of nomenclature in their study "The Influence of Names on Occupational Paths," shedding light on the intriguing ways in which individuals' names may unconsciously steer them toward specific career trajectories. This line of inquiry sets the stage for our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho.

Doe and Jones (2015) also weigh in on this topic in their seminal work "Naming Destiny: The Role of Names in Occupational Preferences." Their comprehensive analysis delves into the complex interplay between nomenclature and vocational inclinations, prompting us to ponder whether the name Jonah holds a deeper significance in the context of nursing education.

Now, as our research sets sail into the tumultuous sea of scholarly literature, let's pause for a moment to appreciate the gravity of our subject matter. It's time for a quick dad joke to keep your scholarly spirits afloat: Why don't data scientists like making resolutions? Because the data always points to regression! It's all fun and games until someone brings a spreadsheet to the party.

As we venture deeper into this ocean of knowledge, it's worth considering the broader cultural and literary influences that could potentially shape our understanding of names and their impact. "The Power of Names: A Cultural Exploration" by Stevenson (2012) offers a thought-provoking exploration of the symbolic significance attributed to names in different societies. While not directly related to our topic, the insights from this work invite us to reflect on the potential nuances underlying the popularity of the name Jonah and its resonance within the realm of nursing education.

Taking a rather imaginative leap, let's turn our attention to fictional works that might shed a whimsical light on our research. "Call Me Ishmael: A Tale of Names and Destiny" by Fictitious Author (1851) is a literary classic that, despite its focus on a different biblical name, delves into the profound impact of nomenclature on the lives of its characters. While our investigation revolves around the name Jonah, this whimsical reference serves as a lighthearted reminder to approach our scholarly pursuits with a sense of curiosity and wonder.

And now, for a completely unexpected turn in our literary explorations, allow us to disclose a rather unorthodox source of insight: CVS receipts. Yes, in a bold departure from conventional research practices, we delved into the labyrinthine scrolls of CVS receipts, scrawled with discounts, offers, and, unbeknownst to many, cryptic messages about the significance of names in career choices. While the veracity of this unconventional approach might be, well, questionable, we cannot discount the unexpected wisdom that lurks within the enigmatic folds of these everyday artifacts.

As we resurface from these literary and not-so-literary detours, our scholarly endeavor to unravel the enigma of the name Jonah and its potential influence on nursing education in Idaho remains steadfast. In the words of a wise old sailor, "When in doubt, consult the data." And so, with the winds of empirical inquiry at our backs, we chart a course toward a deeper understanding of this captivating phenomenon. Off we go, navigating the choppy sea of scholarly inquiry with the name Jonah as our guiding light.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jonah and The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Nurse-ing Jonah: A Whale of a Tale of Names and Numbers in Idaho"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the popularity of the first name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho. Our research team, armed with census data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, set out to answer the age-old question: does the name Jonah lure in more educators to the nursing field, or is it all just a fishy coincidence?

Analyzing data from 2003 to 2018, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8959117 and p < 0.01, prompting us to exclaim, "Well, blow me down!" The evidence suggests that there may be something more to the name Jonah than meets the eye, or should we say nursing scrubs?

While it's tempting to say that this correlation is as clear as the call of a captain to his crew, further research is needed to untangle the complexity of this curious connection. One thing's for sure, though: when it comes to naming future healthcare providers, it seems that Jonah has a whale of an influence.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Much like the legendary tale of Jonah and the whale, our study plunges into the depths of an equally captivating mystery - the relationship between the popularity of the name 'Jonah' and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in the state of Idaho. While some might think this topic is a mere fish story, we are determined to uncover the truth lurking beneath the waves of data and statistics.
Now, before you start thinking we've gone off the deep end with this research, let's cast our nets wide and bask in the glory of some data-driven humor. Why did the researcher go to art school? Because he wanted to draw his own conclusions. Science may be our passion, but we never miss an opportunity for a bit of scholarly silliness.
As we embark on this academic voyage, let's take a moment to appreciate the serious side of our investigation. The fascination with the name Jonah stems from religious and cultural significance, but could it also be linked to the noble profession of nursing education? Our curiosity is as insatiable as a sea monster's appetite, driving us to explore this enigmatic correlation with all the rigor of a dedicated scholarly crew.
Before we dive into the statistical depths, let's reel in a quick dad joke: Why did the statistician go to therapy? Because he had too many unresolved issues. We firmly believe that a little levity can keep our minds afloat in a sea of numbers and hypotheses.
Fueled by the fervor for discovery, we embrace the challenge of unraveling the twining threads of chance and causation. Our journey will navigate the treacherous waters of independent and dependent variables, steering us toward the promised land of empirical insight. With our compass set to the north star of scientific inquiry, we aim to chart a course that even Captain Ahab would commend.
Now, hold on to your scientific hats as we embark on a voyage that might just make a big splash in the world of interdisciplinary research. Join us as we examine the ebb and flow of data, riding the waves of discovery and knowledge. As we navigate the tempest of information, we invite you to stay afloat with us and partake in the surprising revelations that await.
So, with all puns intended, let's set sail towards uncovering the deep-sea secrets of the name 'Jonah' and its peculiar connection to the world of nursing education. As the saying goes, "Water" we waiting for? Let's navigate the choppy waters of empirical investigation and uncover the hidden currents that bind names and numbers in the realm of academia.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To begin our investigation into the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho, we cast our net wide and gathered data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. We focused on the years 2003 to 2018, reeling in information like a determined fisherman working the waters. Naturally, we had to make sure our data was the reel deal.

We conducted a thorough examination of the popularity of the name Jonah using the US Social Security Administration's records, ensuring that we didn't make a whale of a mistake in our data collection. We then scoured the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho, making sure we didn't flounder in our pursuit of precise and reliable information.

With our data in hand, we dove into the sea of statistical analysis. We employed robust correlation analyses to bait out any potential relationships between the popularity of the name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho. Using the trusty tools of statistical software, we reeled in the correlations with the precision of a seasoned angler. Our methods were as sound as a ship's bell, ringing in the truth amidst the waves of data.

Now, it's time for a quick quip: What do you call a fish who performs brain surgery? A neurosturgeon! As we navigate these statistical waters, a dash of humor keeps our fishing expedition lively.

Furthermore, we employed regression analyses to take a deeper dive into the potential causal factors at play. With our statistical harpoons at the ready, we aimed to spear through the tangled underbrush of variables and assumptions, seeking to untangle the knotty correlation between the name Jonah and the nursing education landscape in Idaho.

We also conducted time series analyses to track how the popularity of the name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho have ebbed and flowed over the years. Much like a sailor reading the tides, we ventured into the historical currents of data to map out the fascinating journey of these variables through the choppy sea of time.

In conclusion, through a combination of data collection, statistical analyses, and a sprinkling of humor, our methodology enabled us to navigate the tumultuous waters of this interdisciplinary investigation. With a steady hand on the academic tiller, we set sail to uncover the deep-sea secrets of the name 'Jonah' and its curious connection to the world of nursing education. Because when it comes to science, it's important to stay a-fish-iated with a sense of whimsy!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jonah and The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8959117, r-squared of 0.8026578, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Nurse-ing Jonah: A Whale of a Tale of Names and Numbers in Idaho"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the popularity of the first name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho. Our research team, armed with census data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, set out to answer the age-old question: does the name Jonah lure in more educators to the nursing field, or is it all just a fishy coincidence?

Analyzing data from 2003 to 2018, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8959117 and p < 0.01, prompting us to exclaim, "Well, blow me down!" The evidence suggests that there may be something more to the name Jonah than meets the eye, or should we say nursing scrubs?

While it's tempting to say that this correlation is as clear as the call of a captain to his crew, further research is needed to untangle the complexity of this curious connection. One thing's for sure, though: when it comes to naming future healthcare providers, it seems that Jonah has a whale of an influence.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Much like the legendary tale of Jonah and the whale, our study plunges into the depths of an equally captivating mystery - the relationship between the popularity of the name 'Jonah' and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in the state of Idaho. While some might think this topic is a mere fish story, we are determined to uncover the truth lurking beneath the waves of data and statistics.
Now, before you start thinking we've gone off the deep end with this research, let's cast our nets wide and bask in the glory of some data-driven humor. Why did the researcher go to art school? Because he wanted to draw his own conclusions. Science may be our passion, but we never miss an opportunity for a bit of scholarly silliness.
As we embark on this academic voyage, let's take a moment to appreciate the serious side of our investigation. The fascination with the name Jonah stems from religious and cultural significance, but could it also be linked to the noble profession of nursing education? Our curiosity is as insatiable as a sea monster's appetite, driving us to explore this enigmatic correlation with all the rigor of a dedicated scholarly crew.
Before we dive into the statistical depths, let's reel in a quick dad joke: Why did the statistician go to therapy? Because he had too many unresolved issues. We firmly believe that a little levity can keep our minds afloat in a sea of numbers and hypotheses.
Fueled by the fervor for discovery, we embrace the challenge of unraveling the twining threads of chance and causation. Our journey will navigate the treacherous waters of independent and dependent variables, steering us toward the promised land of empirical insight. With our compass set to the north star of scientific inquiry, we aim to chart a course that even Captain Ahab would commend.
Now, hold on to your scientific hats as we embark on a voyage that might just make a big splash in the world of interdisciplinary research. Join us as we examine the ebb and flow of data, riding the waves of discovery and knowledge. As we navigate the tempest of information, we invite you to stay afloat with us and partake in the surprising revelations that await.
So, with all puns intended, let's set sail towards uncovering the deep-sea secrets of the name 'Jonah' and its peculiar connection to the world of nursing education. As the saying goes, "Water" we waiting for? Let's navigate the choppy waters of empirical investigation and uncover the hidden currents that bind names and numbers in the realm of academia.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon analyzing the data collected between 2003 and 2018, a correlation coefficient of 0.8959117 between the popularity of the first name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho was unearthed. This robust correlation suggests a strong positive relationship between the two variables, akin to the bond between a sailor and his anchor. Well, shiver me timbers – it seems that Jonah's name carries more weight than a ship's cargo!

The r-squared value of 0.8026578 furthers the evidence of a substantial association between the prevalence of the name Jonah and the quantity of nursing educators in the Gem State. This result implies that approximately 80.3% of the variation in the number of nursing instructors and teachers can be explained by the popularity of the name Jonah. It's as if Jonah's name acts as a lodestar, guiding prospective educators into the nursing profession like a beacon in the night.

Furthermore, with a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of the correlation cannot be ignored. The likelihood of the observed relationship occurring by chance alone is less than 1%, leading us to conclude that there is certainly something "fishy" about the connection between the name Jonah and the nursing education workforce in Idaho. It's like finding Nemo in a sea of statistical randomness – statistically unlikely indeed!

Now, let's take a moment to appreciate the visual representation of our findings. As shown in Figure 1, the scatterplot displays a clear and conspicuous pattern, resembling the distinct markings on a leviathan's tail. The points clustering along a positively sloped line indicate a compelling alignment between the popularity of the name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers. It's as if the data points are saying, "Whale, hello there, Jonah's influence!"

With these results, it's safe to say that the name Jonah has more than a fisherman's chance of reeling in future nursing educators in the state of Idaho. This correlation is no fluke – it's the real fin. We might just need a bigger boat to accommodate all the educators inspired by the name Jonah!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jonah and The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Nurse-ing Jonah: A Whale of a Tale of Names and Numbers in Idaho"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the popularity of the first name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho. Our research team, armed with census data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, set out to answer the age-old question: does the name Jonah lure in more educators to the nursing field, or is it all just a fishy coincidence?

Analyzing data from 2003 to 2018, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8959117 and p < 0.01, prompting us to exclaim, "Well, blow me down!" The evidence suggests that there may be something more to the name Jonah than meets the eye, or should we say nursing scrubs?

While it's tempting to say that this correlation is as clear as the call of a captain to his crew, further research is needed to untangle the complexity of this curious connection. One thing's for sure, though: when it comes to naming future healthcare providers, it seems that Jonah has a whale of an influence.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between names and professional career choices has been a subject of fascination and intrigue for researchers across various disciplines. Smith et al. (2010) expound on the psychological implications of nomenclature in their study "The Influence of Names on Occupational Paths," shedding light on the intriguing ways in which individuals' names may unconsciously steer them toward specific career trajectories. This line of inquiry sets the stage for our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho.
Doe and Jones (2015) also weigh in on this topic in their seminal work "Naming Destiny: The Role of Names in Occupational Preferences." Their comprehensive analysis delves into the complex interplay between nomenclature and vocational inclinations, prompting us to ponder whether the name Jonah holds a deeper significance in the context of nursing education.
Now, as our research sets sail into the tumultuous sea of scholarly literature, let's pause for a moment to appreciate the gravity of our subject matter. It's time for a quick dad joke to keep your scholarly spirits afloat: Why don't data scientists like making resolutions? Because the data always points to regression! It's all fun and games until someone brings a spreadsheet to the party.
As we venture deeper into this ocean of knowledge, it's worth considering the broader cultural and literary influences that could potentially shape our understanding of names and their impact. "The Power of Names: A Cultural Exploration" by Stevenson (2012) offers a thought-provoking exploration of the symbolic significance attributed to names in different societies. While not directly related to our topic, the insights from this work invite us to reflect on the potential nuances underlying the popularity of the name Jonah and its resonance within the realm of nursing education.
Taking a rather imaginative leap, let's turn our attention to fictional works that might shed a whimsical light on our research. "Call Me Ishmael: A Tale of Names and Destiny" by Fictitious Author (1851) is a literary classic that, despite its focus on a different biblical name, delves into the profound impact of nomenclature on the lives of its characters. While our investigation revolves around the name Jonah, this whimsical reference serves as a lighthearted reminder to approach our scholarly pursuits with a sense of curiosity and wonder.
And now, for a completely unexpected turn in our literary explorations, allow us to disclose a rather unorthodox source of insight: CVS receipts. Yes, in a bold departure from conventional research practices, we delved into the labyrinthine scrolls of CVS receipts, scrawled with discounts, offers, and, unbeknownst to many, cryptic messages about the significance of names in career choices. While the veracity of this unconventional approach might be, well, questionable, we cannot discount the unexpected wisdom that lurks within the enigmatic folds of these everyday artifacts.
As we resurface from these literary and not-so-literary detours, our scholarly endeavor to unravel the enigma of the name Jonah and its potential influence on nursing education in Idaho remains steadfast. In the words of a wise old sailor, "When in doubt, consult the data." And so, with the winds of empirical inquiry at our backs, we chart a course toward a deeper understanding of this captivating phenomenon. Off we go, navigating the choppy sea of scholarly inquiry with the name Jonah as our guiding light.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data collected between 2003 and 2018, a correlation coefficient of 0.8959117 between the popularity of the first name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho was unearthed. This robust correlation suggests a strong positive relationship between the two variables, akin to the bond between a sailor and his anchor. Well, shiver me timbers – it seems that Jonah's name carries more weight than a ship's cargo!
The r-squared value of 0.8026578 furthers the evidence of a substantial association between the prevalence of the name Jonah and the quantity of nursing educators in the Gem State. This result implies that approximately 80.3% of the variation in the number of nursing instructors and teachers can be explained by the popularity of the name Jonah. It's as if Jonah's name acts as a lodestar, guiding prospective educators into the nursing profession like a beacon in the night.
Furthermore, with a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of the correlation cannot be ignored. The likelihood of the observed relationship occurring by chance alone is less than 1%, leading us to conclude that there is certainly something "fishy" about the connection between the name Jonah and the nursing education workforce in Idaho. It's like finding Nemo in a sea of statistical randomness – statistically unlikely indeed!
Now, let's take a moment to appreciate the visual representation of our findings. As shown in Figure 1, the scatterplot displays a clear and conspicuous pattern, resembling the distinct markings on a leviathan's tail. The points clustering along a positively sloped line indicate a compelling alignment between the popularity of the name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers. It's as if the data points are saying, "Whale, hello there, Jonah's influence!"
With these results, it's safe to say that the name Jonah has more than a fisherman's chance of reeling in future nursing educators in the state of Idaho. This correlation is no fluke – it's the real fin. We might just need a bigger boat to accommodate all the educators inspired by the name Jonah!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The correlation between the popularity of the first name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho has surfaced as a captivating finding, leaving us to navigate the tumultuous waters of scholarly inquiry and statistical analysis. Our research has not only supported the prior literature, but it has also cast a dazzling spotlight on the monumental influence of nomenclature on vocational pathways.

As we sail through the sea of data and statistical significances, it's hard to resist a dad joke: Why don't statisticians trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Indeed, with an r-squared value of 0.8026578, approximately 80.3% of the variation in the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho can be attributed to the popularity of the name Jonah. It's as if the name Jonah acts as a magnet, drawing educators into the world of nursing with an irresistible force.

Our findings align harmoniously with the work of Smith et al. (2010) and Doe and Jones (2015), offering empirical validation to the notion that names can subtly steer individuals toward particular career trajectories. The correlation coefficient of 0.8959117 in our study underscores the profound impact of nomenclature, prompting us to contemplate whether the name Jonah indeed carries an implicit allure for those entering the nursing profession. Perhaps the call of the whale – or should we say, the wail of the whale – is stronger than we could have ever imagined.

In the spirit of connecting the dots between literature and our empirical investigation, it's worth recalling our whimsical literary references from the literature review. In the immortal words of Captain Ahab, "From hell's heart, I stab at thee!" – but fear not, for our findings come not from torment, but from meticulous analysis. The statistical significance of our results, illustrated by a p-value of less than 0.01, is akin to uncovering the elusive Moby Dick of correlations – a rare and awe-inspiring feat in the empirical seascape.

Returning to the more serious – yet equally whimsical – realms of statistical representation, the scatterplot in Figure 1 reflects a compelling narrative. The vivid pattern of data points mirrors the undulating majesty of ocean waves, where the correlation between the name Jonah and the nursing education workforce in Idaho glistens like the sun on the sea's surface. It seems that Jonah's influence transcends metaphor and ventures into the realm of statistical reality – a phenomenon as captivating as tales of mythical sea creatures.

Embracing the unexpected wisdom that lurks within the labyrinthine scrolls of CVS receipts, our research has, in fact, untangled a cryptic message: the influence of the name Jonah on nursing education in Idaho is not to be taken lightly. From the whimsical to the empirical, our scholarly journey has shed light on a connection that, much like the enigmatic depths of the ocean, beckons us to venture further into the uncharted waters of nomenclature and career choices.

As we suspend our discussion – for now – the significance of our findings cannot be overstated. The correlations we've uncovered, like a pod of exuberant dolphins, frolic at the intersection of names, occupations, and statistical inquiry. The implications of our research may well ripple through the scholarly seascape, inviting further exploration of the understated yet profound impact of names on the tapestry of professional trajectories. And with that, we bid adieu to this leg of our academic voyage, eagerly anticipating the next tidal wave of discovery. Onward, we sail!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jonah and The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Nurse-ing Jonah: A Whale of a Tale of Names and Numbers in Idaho"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the popularity of the first name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho. Our research team, armed with census data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, set out to answer the age-old question: does the name Jonah lure in more educators to the nursing field, or is it all just a fishy coincidence?

Analyzing data from 2003 to 2018, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8959117 and p < 0.01, prompting us to exclaim, "Well, blow me down!" The evidence suggests that there may be something more to the name Jonah than meets the eye, or should we say nursing scrubs?

While it's tempting to say that this correlation is as clear as the call of a captain to his crew, further research is needed to untangle the complexity of this curious connection. One thing's for sure, though: when it comes to naming future healthcare providers, it seems that Jonah has a whale of an influence.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Much like the legendary tale of Jonah and the whale, our study plunges into the depths of an equally captivating mystery - the relationship between the popularity of the name 'Jonah' and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in the state of Idaho. While some might think this topic is a mere fish story, we are determined to uncover the truth lurking beneath the waves of data and statistics.
Now, before you start thinking we've gone off the deep end with this research, let's cast our nets wide and bask in the glory of some data-driven humor. Why did the researcher go to art school? Because he wanted to draw his own conclusions. Science may be our passion, but we never miss an opportunity for a bit of scholarly silliness.
As we embark on this academic voyage, let's take a moment to appreciate the serious side of our investigation. The fascination with the name Jonah stems from religious and cultural significance, but could it also be linked to the noble profession of nursing education? Our curiosity is as insatiable as a sea monster's appetite, driving us to explore this enigmatic correlation with all the rigor of a dedicated scholarly crew.
Before we dive into the statistical depths, let's reel in a quick dad joke: Why did the statistician go to therapy? Because he had too many unresolved issues. We firmly believe that a little levity can keep our minds afloat in a sea of numbers and hypotheses.
Fueled by the fervor for discovery, we embrace the challenge of unraveling the twining threads of chance and causation. Our journey will navigate the treacherous waters of independent and dependent variables, steering us toward the promised land of empirical insight. With our compass set to the north star of scientific inquiry, we aim to chart a course that even Captain Ahab would commend.
Now, hold on to your scientific hats as we embark on a voyage that might just make a big splash in the world of interdisciplinary research. Join us as we examine the ebb and flow of data, riding the waves of discovery and knowledge. As we navigate the tempest of information, we invite you to stay afloat with us and partake in the surprising revelations that await.
So, with all puns intended, let's set sail towards uncovering the deep-sea secrets of the name 'Jonah' and its peculiar connection to the world of nursing education. As the saying goes, "Water" we waiting for? Let's navigate the choppy waters of empirical investigation and uncover the hidden currents that bind names and numbers in the realm of academia.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data collected between 2003 and 2018, a correlation coefficient of 0.8959117 between the popularity of the first name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho was unearthed. This robust correlation suggests a strong positive relationship between the two variables, akin to the bond between a sailor and his anchor. Well, shiver me timbers – it seems that Jonah's name carries more weight than a ship's cargo!
The r-squared value of 0.8026578 furthers the evidence of a substantial association between the prevalence of the name Jonah and the quantity of nursing educators in the Gem State. This result implies that approximately 80.3% of the variation in the number of nursing instructors and teachers can be explained by the popularity of the name Jonah. It's as if Jonah's name acts as a lodestar, guiding prospective educators into the nursing profession like a beacon in the night.
Furthermore, with a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of the correlation cannot be ignored. The likelihood of the observed relationship occurring by chance alone is less than 1%, leading us to conclude that there is certainly something "fishy" about the connection between the name Jonah and the nursing education workforce in Idaho. It's like finding Nemo in a sea of statistical randomness – statistically unlikely indeed!
Now, let's take a moment to appreciate the visual representation of our findings. As shown in Figure 1, the scatterplot displays a clear and conspicuous pattern, resembling the distinct markings on a leviathan's tail. The points clustering along a positively sloped line indicate a compelling alignment between the popularity of the name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers. It's as if the data points are saying, "Whale, hello there, Jonah's influence!"
With these results, it's safe to say that the name Jonah has more than a fisherman's chance of reeling in future nursing educators in the state of Idaho. This correlation is no fluke – it's the real fin. We might just need a bigger boat to accommodate all the educators inspired by the name Jonah!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has successfully navigated the turbulent waters of statistical analysis to reveal a compelling correlation between the prevalence of the name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho. It seems that the name Jonah is as influential as a siren's song in luring educators into the noble profession of nursing. I guess you could say it's quite a 'whale' of an influence!

As we part ways, let me leave you with a parting dad joke: What did one ocean say to the other ocean? Nothing, they just waved. But we won't wave away the significance of our findings! It's clear that the relationship between the name Jonah and nursing education in Idaho is no mere fluke – it's a 'reely' strong association.

With such a 'shore'fire correlation and statistical significance, we can confidently say that there's no need for further research in this area. So, let's 'seas' the day and ride this scientific 'current' to new research endeavors!



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Nurse-ing Jonah: A Whale of a Tale of Names and Numbers in Idaho. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Marine Mammal Medicine and Mythology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Nurse-ing Jonah: A Whale of a Tale of Names and Numbers in Idaho. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Amusing Anecdotes and Academic Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Nurse-ing Jonah: A Whale of a Tale of Names and Numbers in Idaho with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the popularity of the first name Jonah and the number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho. Our research team, armed with census data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, set out to answer the age-old question: does the name Jonah lure in more educators to the nursing field, or is it all just a fishy coincidence?
Analyzing data from 2003 to 2018, our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8959117 and p < 0.01, prompting us to exclaim, "Well, blow me down!" The evidence suggests that there may be something more to the name Jonah than meets the eye, or should we say nursing scrubs?
While it's tempting to say that this correlation is as clear as the call of a captain to his crew, further research is needed to untangle the complexity of this curious connection. One thing's for sure, though: when it comes to naming future healthcare providers, it seems that Jonah has a whale of an influence.

ChatGPT:

Jonah, nursing instructors, nursing teachers, Idaho, correlation, US Social Security Administration, Bureau of Labor Statistics, census data, healthcare providers, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, first name popularity

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Jonah
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Jonah
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Jonah

The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of nursing instructors and teachers, postsecondary in Idaho
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho

Correlation r = 0.8959117 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8026578 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 80.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Jonah) over the 16 years from 2003 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.7E-6. 0.0000026849615357466558000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.00027% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 372,445 random variables You don't actually need 372 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.72, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018
Popularity of the first name Jonah (Babies born)2446231522392430253529982734279728902968291929442937280325442757
The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho (Laborers)904030130170260270310280240280350310250180340




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2446,2315,2239,2430,2535,2998,2734,2797,2890,2968,2919,2944,2937,2803,2544,2757,])
array_2 = np.array([90,40,30,130,170,260,270,310,280,240,280,350,310,250,180,340,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Jonah"
array_2_name = "The number of nursing instructors and teachers in Idaho"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 3016 · Black Variable ID: 2368 · Red Variable ID: 7163
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0