about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,871 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the second variable is The number of bailiffs in Wisconsin.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin increased, more people developed respiratory issues. This led to an influx of courtroom cases, requiring the need for additional bailiffs to maintain order. It's a classic case of 'breathe easy, but not too easy' in the Wisconsin judicial system.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a minimalist courtroom scene in Appleton, Wisconsin, with the air murky from pollution. Depict a line of bailiffs standing with handcuffs glinting in the dim light, ready to uphold the law and bring culprits of pollution to justice. The overall scene should be rendered in a simple, stark style in line with minimalism. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and The number of bailiffs in Wisconsin. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism Minimalism Low poly Scalar art Minimalism
ChatGPT: Minimalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and The number of bailiffs in Wisconsin, in the following situation: Because as air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin increased, people started coughing more, leading to a higher demand for bailiffs in courtrooms to 'cuff' all the culprits responsible for the pollution.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Appleton, Wisconsin, the air is murky with pollution, causing people to cough and cover their mouths. Nearby, a line of bailiffs stands ready in the courtroom, their handcuffs glinting in the dim light, as they prepare to uphold the law and bring the culprits of the pollution to justice.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Minimalism ] and depicting this scene: In Appleton, Wisconsin, the air is murky with pollution, causing people to cough and cover their mouths. Nearby, a line of bailiffs stands ready in the courtroom, their handcuffs glinting in the dim light, as they prepare to uphold the law and bring the culprits of the pollution to justice. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a minimalist courtroom scene in Appleton, Wisconsin, with the air murky from pollution. Depict a line of bailiffs standing with handcuffs glinting in the dim light, ready to uphold the law and bring culprits of pollution to justice. The overall scene should be rendered in a simple, stark style in line with minimalism.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin positively influenced The number of bailiffs in Wisconsin. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Breath of Fresh Air: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the Bailiff Boom in the Badger State

Journal of Environmental Breezology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and The number of bailiffs in Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7265047 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Air: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the Bailiff Boom in the Badger State

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the curious connection between air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the number of bailiffs in the fine state of Wisconsin. With our research team's keen eye for correlation, we used data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to investigate this peculiar pairing. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7265047 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2003 to 2021. Our results provide compelling evidence of a link between polluted air and the proliferation of bailiffs, shedding light on the unexpected influence of environmental factors on the legal system. Our research not only offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of interdisciplinary studies but also highlights the need for further examination of the far-reaching effects of air pollution.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and The number of bailiffs in Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Air: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the Bailiff Boom in the Badger State

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the curious connection between air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the number of bailiffs in the fine state of Wisconsin. With our research team's keen eye for correlation, we used data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to investigate this peculiar pairing. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7265047 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2003 to 2021. Our results provide compelling evidence of a link between polluted air and the proliferation of bailiffs, shedding light on the unexpected influence of environmental factors on the legal system. Our research not only offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of interdisciplinary studies but also highlights the need for further examination of the far-reaching effects of air pollution.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As we venture into the labyrinth of empirical research, we often encounter unexpected associations and entangled relationships that leave us scratching our heads and muttering, "Well, isn't that peculiar." One such bewitching intersection that has captured our scholarly curiosity is the correlation between the quality of the air we breathe in Appleton, Wisconsin, and the presence of bailiffs in the great state of Wisconsin. Yes, you heard that right – we are embarking on a journey to explore the funky connection between environmental air quality and the legal system, and boy, is it a breath of fresh air in the world of interdisciplinary studies!

Now, before you start gasping for air in anticipation, let's clear the air on what exactly we're delving into here. In this study, we set out to unravel the mystery behind the surge in the number of bailiffs in Wisconsin and its potential link to air pollution levels in the charming city of Appleton. By harnessing the power of statistical analysis and diving into a pool of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we aimed to bring this quirky correlation into the spotlight.

You may be wondering why we chose to embark on this whimsical expedition. Well, science is all about uncovering the unexpected, and what could be more unexpected than unearthing a connection between the air we breathe and the guardians of justice? Besides, who wouldn't want to add a dash of intrigue and amusement to the world of academia?

As we embark on this academic escapade, rest assured that we'll sprinkle in some statistical wizardry, toss around some puns, and perhaps even unearth a correlation coefficient or two that will make you gasp (or wheeze, depending on the air quality). So, buckle up, and let's take a deep breath as we dive into the enigmatic nexus of air pollution and the bailiff boom in the Badger State.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and The number of bailiffs in Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Air: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the Bailiff Boom in the Badger State

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the curious connection between air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the number of bailiffs in the fine state of Wisconsin. With our research team's keen eye for correlation, we used data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to investigate this peculiar pairing. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7265047 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2003 to 2021. Our results provide compelling evidence of a link between polluted air and the proliferation of bailiffs, shedding light on the unexpected influence of environmental factors on the legal system. Our research not only offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of interdisciplinary studies but also highlights the need for further examination of the far-reaching effects of air pollution.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we venture into the labyrinth of empirical research, we often encounter unexpected associations and entangled relationships that leave us scratching our heads and muttering, "Well, isn't that peculiar." One such bewitching intersection that has captured our scholarly curiosity is the correlation between the quality of the air we breathe in Appleton, Wisconsin, and the presence of bailiffs in the great state of Wisconsin. Yes, you heard that right – we are embarking on a journey to explore the funky connection between environmental air quality and the legal system, and boy, is it a breath of fresh air in the world of interdisciplinary studies!
Now, before you start gasping for air in anticipation, let's clear the air on what exactly we're delving into here. In this study, we set out to unravel the mystery behind the surge in the number of bailiffs in Wisconsin and its potential link to air pollution levels in the charming city of Appleton. By harnessing the power of statistical analysis and diving into a pool of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we aimed to bring this quirky correlation into the spotlight.
You may be wondering why we chose to embark on this whimsical expedition. Well, science is all about uncovering the unexpected, and what could be more unexpected than unearthing a connection between the air we breathe and the guardians of justice? Besides, who wouldn't want to add a dash of intrigue and amusement to the world of academia?
As we embark on this academic escapade, rest assured that we'll sprinkle in some statistical wizardry, toss around some puns, and perhaps even unearth a correlation coefficient or two that will make you gasp (or wheeze, depending on the air quality). So, buckle up, and let's take a deep breath as we dive into the enigmatic nexus of air pollution and the bailiff boom in the Badger State.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To begin our quest for understanding the curious connection between air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the surge in bailiff numbers across the state, we must first examine the existing body of literature on the subject. Smith et al. in their groundbreaking study "Aire Impurities and Law Enforcement: A Statistical Odyssey" reveal a nuanced relationship between particulate matter and the proliferation of legal guardians. They point to the potential impact of air pollutants on cognitive function, positing that inhaling polluted air may lead to an increase in legal disputes, therefore necessitating more bailiffs to maintain law and order.

In a pioneering work entitled "The Winds of Justice: Exploring Atmospheric Influences on Legal Personnel" by Doe and Jones, the authors delve into the atmospheric conditions of various regions and their correlation with the deployment of bailiffs. Their findings suggest that air quality may play a pivotal role in determining the staffing requirements of court security personnel, with higher levels of pollution seemingly leading to a greater demand for bailiffs.

Shifting our focus to more tangentially related literature, we encounter "The Economics of Air Pollution" by Stern, a comprehensive exploration of the economic implications of environmental degradation. While the central focus of the book lies in the economic costs of pollution, its insights provide a valuable backdrop for understanding the broader repercussions of air pollution, including its potential influence on legal infrastructure.

In stark contrast, the fictional realm proffers "Smoke and Mirrors: A Legal Mystery" by Wilde, where the plot revolves around a beleaguered attorney who navigates a web of deceit while grappling with the insidious effects of air pollution in a small town. While a work of fiction, the author's narrative offers an intriguing, albeit whimsical, perspective on the intertwined fate of air quality and the legal system.

Turning to the world of animated content, the cartoon "Clean Air, Fair Share" emanates a light-hearted yet didactic portrayal of air pollution and its ramifications on communities. While ostensibly geared towards young audiences, the cartoon serves as a delightful reminder of the real-world implications of environmental degradation, albeit sans the whimsical antics of anthropomorphic characters.

As we traverse the varied landscape of literature, from scholarly to fictional realms and even cartoon capers, the interplay of air pollution and the legal apparatus beckons with an enigmatic allure. Join us as we unravel this intriguing tapestry, armed with statistical rigor and a flair for the unexpected.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and The number of bailiffs in Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Air: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the Bailiff Boom in the Badger State

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the curious connection between air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the number of bailiffs in the fine state of Wisconsin. With our research team's keen eye for correlation, we used data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to investigate this peculiar pairing. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7265047 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2003 to 2021. Our results provide compelling evidence of a link between polluted air and the proliferation of bailiffs, shedding light on the unexpected influence of environmental factors on the legal system. Our research not only offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of interdisciplinary studies but also highlights the need for further examination of the far-reaching effects of air pollution.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we venture into the labyrinth of empirical research, we often encounter unexpected associations and entangled relationships that leave us scratching our heads and muttering, "Well, isn't that peculiar." One such bewitching intersection that has captured our scholarly curiosity is the correlation between the quality of the air we breathe in Appleton, Wisconsin, and the presence of bailiffs in the great state of Wisconsin. Yes, you heard that right – we are embarking on a journey to explore the funky connection between environmental air quality and the legal system, and boy, is it a breath of fresh air in the world of interdisciplinary studies!
Now, before you start gasping for air in anticipation, let's clear the air on what exactly we're delving into here. In this study, we set out to unravel the mystery behind the surge in the number of bailiffs in Wisconsin and its potential link to air pollution levels in the charming city of Appleton. By harnessing the power of statistical analysis and diving into a pool of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we aimed to bring this quirky correlation into the spotlight.
You may be wondering why we chose to embark on this whimsical expedition. Well, science is all about uncovering the unexpected, and what could be more unexpected than unearthing a connection between the air we breathe and the guardians of justice? Besides, who wouldn't want to add a dash of intrigue and amusement to the world of academia?
As we embark on this academic escapade, rest assured that we'll sprinkle in some statistical wizardry, toss around some puns, and perhaps even unearth a correlation coefficient or two that will make you gasp (or wheeze, depending on the air quality). So, buckle up, and let's take a deep breath as we dive into the enigmatic nexus of air pollution and the bailiff boom in the Badger State.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the elusive connection between the air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the proliferation of bailiffs in the state of Wisconsin, our research team embarked on a research odyssey that involved a blend of statistical acrobatics and data detective work.

First and foremost, we scoured the vast expanse of the internet, navigating through the virtual realm like intrepid explorers seeking the treasures of information. Our quest led us to the hallowed repositories of data at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Like skilled alchemists, we sifted through a plethora of datasets spanning the years 2003 to 2021, discerning patterns and correlations amidst the sea of numbers.

With our magnifying glass firmly in hand, we zeroed in on the air quality data from Appleton, a city known for its picturesque charm and penchant for confounding researchers with its intriguing correlations. The air quality index (AQI) became our guiding star, illuminating the fluctuations in atmospheric composition and the whims of Mother Nature.

Simultaneously, we turned our attention to the BLS treasure trove, where the tantalizing figures on the number of bailiffs in Wisconsin awaited our perusal. Like sleuths in a who-done-it mystery, we meticulously documented the ebbs and flows of the bailiff population, teasing out the nuances that lay beneath the seemingly innocuous numbers.

Armed with these datasets brimming with potential connections, we wielded the tools of statistical analysis with a flair for the dramatic. Our weapon of choice? The trusty correlation coefficient, serving as both our compass and our telescope as we navigated the murky waters of empirical inquiry.

We used the Pearson correlation coefficient to illuminate the relationship between air pollution levels in Appleton and the number of bailiffs in Wisconsin. With bated breath and feverish anticipation, we watched as the data unfurled its narrative, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.7265047, surpassing the fabled threshold of statistical significance with a p-value of less than 0.01.

In our quest to unravel this curious connection, we deployed various statistical models, including regression analysis and time series analysis, to paint a vivid portrait of the intertwined fates of air pollution and the bailiff battalion. Like artisans sculpting the marble of data, we molded the information into compelling visualizations and models that spoke volumes about the relationship at hand.

Admittedly, our foray into the realm of statistics and data analysis had the potential to induce more than a few dizzy spells, but we persevered with unwavering determination and a healthy dose of caffeine. Our approach was as methodical as it was adventurous, as we navigated the labyrinthine pathways of empirical inquiry with a sense of wonder and a sprinkle of statistical pizzazz.

Now, with our findings in hand, we stand ready to unveil the intriguing tapestry of connections between air pollution in Appleton and the bailiff boom in the Badger State, inviting fellow researchers and enthusiasts of statistical quirks to partake in the whimsical journey that defies conventional boundaries of correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and The number of bailiffs in Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7265047, r-squared of 0.5278091, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Air: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the Bailiff Boom in the Badger State

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the curious connection between air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the number of bailiffs in the fine state of Wisconsin. With our research team's keen eye for correlation, we used data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to investigate this peculiar pairing. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7265047 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2003 to 2021. Our results provide compelling evidence of a link between polluted air and the proliferation of bailiffs, shedding light on the unexpected influence of environmental factors on the legal system. Our research not only offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of interdisciplinary studies but also highlights the need for further examination of the far-reaching effects of air pollution.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As we venture into the labyrinth of empirical research, we often encounter unexpected associations and entangled relationships that leave us scratching our heads and muttering, "Well, isn't that peculiar." One such bewitching intersection that has captured our scholarly curiosity is the correlation between the quality of the air we breathe in Appleton, Wisconsin, and the presence of bailiffs in the great state of Wisconsin. Yes, you heard that right – we are embarking on a journey to explore the funky connection between environmental air quality and the legal system, and boy, is it a breath of fresh air in the world of interdisciplinary studies!
Now, before you start gasping for air in anticipation, let's clear the air on what exactly we're delving into here. In this study, we set out to unravel the mystery behind the surge in the number of bailiffs in Wisconsin and its potential link to air pollution levels in the charming city of Appleton. By harnessing the power of statistical analysis and diving into a pool of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we aimed to bring this quirky correlation into the spotlight.
You may be wondering why we chose to embark on this whimsical expedition. Well, science is all about uncovering the unexpected, and what could be more unexpected than unearthing a connection between the air we breathe and the guardians of justice? Besides, who wouldn't want to add a dash of intrigue and amusement to the world of academia?
As we embark on this academic escapade, rest assured that we'll sprinkle in some statistical wizardry, toss around some puns, and perhaps even unearth a correlation coefficient or two that will make you gasp (or wheeze, depending on the air quality). So, buckle up, and let's take a deep breath as we dive into the enigmatic nexus of air pollution and the bailiff boom in the Badger State.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In our quest to unravel the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the burgeoning brood of bailiffs in the bucolic Badger State, we stumbled upon some fascinating findings. Our statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7265047, indicating a potent association between these seemingly disparate variables. With an r-squared value of 0.5278091 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our results not only raise eyebrows but also prompt an intrigued whistle – it seems the air in Appleton may hold more weight in the legal sphere than we previously thought!

So, what does this all mean? It means that as air pollution levels in Appleton waxed and waned over the years from 2003 to 2021, the number of bailiffs in Wisconsin mirrored this dance with an eerily close synchrony. The scatterplot in Fig. 1 captures this striking correlation, showcasing the dance of data points that waltz in unison, almost as if the invisible hand of air pollution is orchestrating this peculiar pas de deux with the legal system.

Our results not only tickle the fancy of curious minds but also beckon us to contemplate the intriguing interplay between the environment and the judicial domain. The air we breathe may not only taint our lungs but also leave an indelible mark on the legal landscape. Perhaps, in the courtroom of statistical analysis, the evidence of an air-borne influence on the law is undeniable, leaving us with a breathless pause and a chuckle at the whimsical ways of the world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and The number of bailiffs in Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Air: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the Bailiff Boom in the Badger State

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the curious connection between air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the number of bailiffs in the fine state of Wisconsin. With our research team's keen eye for correlation, we used data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to investigate this peculiar pairing. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7265047 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2003 to 2021. Our results provide compelling evidence of a link between polluted air and the proliferation of bailiffs, shedding light on the unexpected influence of environmental factors on the legal system. Our research not only offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of interdisciplinary studies but also highlights the need for further examination of the far-reaching effects of air pollution.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To begin our quest for understanding the curious connection between air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the surge in bailiff numbers across the state, we must first examine the existing body of literature on the subject. Smith et al. in their groundbreaking study "Aire Impurities and Law Enforcement: A Statistical Odyssey" reveal a nuanced relationship between particulate matter and the proliferation of legal guardians. They point to the potential impact of air pollutants on cognitive function, positing that inhaling polluted air may lead to an increase in legal disputes, therefore necessitating more bailiffs to maintain law and order.
In a pioneering work entitled "The Winds of Justice: Exploring Atmospheric Influences on Legal Personnel" by Doe and Jones, the authors delve into the atmospheric conditions of various regions and their correlation with the deployment of bailiffs. Their findings suggest that air quality may play a pivotal role in determining the staffing requirements of court security personnel, with higher levels of pollution seemingly leading to a greater demand for bailiffs.
Shifting our focus to more tangentially related literature, we encounter "The Economics of Air Pollution" by Stern, a comprehensive exploration of the economic implications of environmental degradation. While the central focus of the book lies in the economic costs of pollution, its insights provide a valuable backdrop for understanding the broader repercussions of air pollution, including its potential influence on legal infrastructure.
In stark contrast, the fictional realm proffers "Smoke and Mirrors: A Legal Mystery" by Wilde, where the plot revolves around a beleaguered attorney who navigates a web of deceit while grappling with the insidious effects of air pollution in a small town. While a work of fiction, the author's narrative offers an intriguing, albeit whimsical, perspective on the intertwined fate of air quality and the legal system.
Turning to the world of animated content, the cartoon "Clean Air, Fair Share" emanates a light-hearted yet didactic portrayal of air pollution and its ramifications on communities. While ostensibly geared towards young audiences, the cartoon serves as a delightful reminder of the real-world implications of environmental degradation, albeit sans the whimsical antics of anthropomorphic characters.
As we traverse the varied landscape of literature, from scholarly to fictional realms and even cartoon capers, the interplay of air pollution and the legal apparatus beckons with an enigmatic allure. Join us as we unravel this intriguing tapestry, armed with statistical rigor and a flair for the unexpected.

[[RESULTS]]
In our quest to unravel the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the burgeoning brood of bailiffs in the bucolic Badger State, we stumbled upon some fascinating findings. Our statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7265047, indicating a potent association between these seemingly disparate variables. With an r-squared value of 0.5278091 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our results not only raise eyebrows but also prompt an intrigued whistle – it seems the air in Appleton may hold more weight in the legal sphere than we previously thought!
So, what does this all mean? It means that as air pollution levels in Appleton waxed and waned over the years from 2003 to 2021, the number of bailiffs in Wisconsin mirrored this dance with an eerily close synchrony. The scatterplot in Fig. 1 captures this striking correlation, showcasing the dance of data points that waltz in unison, almost as if the invisible hand of air pollution is orchestrating this peculiar pas de deux with the legal system.
Our results not only tickle the fancy of curious minds but also beckon us to contemplate the intriguing interplay between the environment and the judicial domain. The air we breathe may not only taint our lungs but also leave an indelible mark on the legal landscape. Perhaps, in the courtroom of statistical analysis, the evidence of an air-borne influence on the law is undeniable, leaving us with a breathless pause and a chuckle at the whimsical ways of the world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have unveiled a fascinating symphony of statistical significance, playing a peculiar melody that interweaves the invisible tendrils of air pollution with the visible realm of law and order. As we draw upon the whimsical insights from previous research, including Smith et al.'s "Aire Impurities and Law Enforcement: A Statistical Odyssey," it becomes clear that the air we breathe may hold more sway over our legal affairs than previously surmised. The nuanced relationship between particulate matter and the profusion of legal guardians hints at a connection that is as mysterious as it is compelling.

Doe and Jones, in their riveting exploration "The Winds of Justice: Exploring Atmospheric Influences on Legal Personnel," set the stage for our own investigation, showcasing how higher pollution levels seemingly beckon a greater demand for bailiffs. Their work, while tinged with a dash of humor, provides a whimsical yet insightful lens through which we view the palpable influence of environmental factors on the legal infrastructure. Our own research supports and extends these findings, serving as a validation of these earlier works while offering a breath of fresh air in statistical inquiry.

The lighthearted perspective of Wilde's "Smoke and Mirrors: A Legal Mystery" nudges us to consider the intricate dance between air quality and the legal system, underscoring the compelling allure of this enigmatic connection. Even as a work of fiction, Wilde's narrative echoes the underlying thematic resonance that our research illuminates – the insidious effects of air pollution may not be confined to mere whimsical flights of fancy, but may also permeate the corridors of justice in unexpected ways.

Furthermore, the cartoon "Clean Air, Fair Share" evokes a sense of jocund didacticism, reminding us that even in the realm of academic inquiry, there is room for lighthearted reflection. As we untangle the intricate tapestry of air pollution and legal infrastructure, we find ourselves grappling with a subject that echoes the reverberations of environmental degradation on the societal framework.

Our results, bolstered by a robust correlation coefficient and a tantalizingly low p-value, not only corroborate the whimsical suppositions put forth in prior literature but also galvanize us to embrace the unexpected influence of air pollution on the legal domain. On the statistical stage, our findings stand as a testament to the unassuming ways in which even the air we breathe may find a place in the annals of legal history. Thus, our research not only provides a delightful quirk in the annals of statistical inquiry but also underscores the zany caprice of causality in the wild waltz of interconnected variables.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and The number of bailiffs in Wisconsin. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Air: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the Bailiff Boom in the Badger State

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the curious connection between air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the number of bailiffs in the fine state of Wisconsin. With our research team's keen eye for correlation, we used data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to investigate this peculiar pairing. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7265047 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2003 to 2021. Our results provide compelling evidence of a link between polluted air and the proliferation of bailiffs, shedding light on the unexpected influence of environmental factors on the legal system. Our research not only offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of interdisciplinary studies but also highlights the need for further examination of the far-reaching effects of air pollution.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As we venture into the labyrinth of empirical research, we often encounter unexpected associations and entangled relationships that leave us scratching our heads and muttering, "Well, isn't that peculiar." One such bewitching intersection that has captured our scholarly curiosity is the correlation between the quality of the air we breathe in Appleton, Wisconsin, and the presence of bailiffs in the great state of Wisconsin. Yes, you heard that right – we are embarking on a journey to explore the funky connection between environmental air quality and the legal system, and boy, is it a breath of fresh air in the world of interdisciplinary studies!
Now, before you start gasping for air in anticipation, let's clear the air on what exactly we're delving into here. In this study, we set out to unravel the mystery behind the surge in the number of bailiffs in Wisconsin and its potential link to air pollution levels in the charming city of Appleton. By harnessing the power of statistical analysis and diving into a pool of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we aimed to bring this quirky correlation into the spotlight.
You may be wondering why we chose to embark on this whimsical expedition. Well, science is all about uncovering the unexpected, and what could be more unexpected than unearthing a connection between the air we breathe and the guardians of justice? Besides, who wouldn't want to add a dash of intrigue and amusement to the world of academia?
As we embark on this academic escapade, rest assured that we'll sprinkle in some statistical wizardry, toss around some puns, and perhaps even unearth a correlation coefficient or two that will make you gasp (or wheeze, depending on the air quality). So, buckle up, and let's take a deep breath as we dive into the enigmatic nexus of air pollution and the bailiff boom in the Badger State.

[[RESULTS]]
In our quest to unravel the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the burgeoning brood of bailiffs in the bucolic Badger State, we stumbled upon some fascinating findings. Our statistical analysis revealed a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7265047, indicating a potent association between these seemingly disparate variables. With an r-squared value of 0.5278091 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our results not only raise eyebrows but also prompt an intrigued whistle – it seems the air in Appleton may hold more weight in the legal sphere than we previously thought!
So, what does this all mean? It means that as air pollution levels in Appleton waxed and waned over the years from 2003 to 2021, the number of bailiffs in Wisconsin mirrored this dance with an eerily close synchrony. The scatterplot in Fig. 1 captures this striking correlation, showcasing the dance of data points that waltz in unison, almost as if the invisible hand of air pollution is orchestrating this peculiar pas de deux with the legal system.
Our results not only tickle the fancy of curious minds but also beckon us to contemplate the intriguing interplay between the environment and the judicial domain. The air we breathe may not only taint our lungs but also leave an indelible mark on the legal landscape. Perhaps, in the courtroom of statistical analysis, the evidence of an air-borne influence on the law is undeniable, leaving us with a breathless pause and a chuckle at the whimsical ways of the world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

After untangling the intriguing web of data and sniffing out the compelling connection between air pollution in Appleton and the bailiff bonanza in Wisconsin, it's clear that the air we breathe may have more influence on the legal scene than we ever imagined. Our findings not only leave us in awe of the whimsical ways of statistical correlation but also urge us to ponder the peculiar pas de deux between environmental factors and the judicial system.

As we wrap up this peculiar peek into the intersection of air quality and legal guardians, it's tempting to crack a pun about a "bailiff in the air" or quip that these findings have truly "aired out" the unexpected influence of pollution on the legal stage. However, let's not let the humor cloud the significance of our research. The compelling correlation coefficient and p-value speak volumes about the surprising impact of air pollution on the legal domain, leaving us in a respiratory rhapsody of statistical marvel.

So, where do we go from here? While the findings of this study may leave us breathless with intrigue, it's safe to say that no further research is needed in this area. The connection between air pollution and bailiffs in Wisconsin has been aired out, leaving us with a breath of fresh air in the quirky realm of interdisciplinary studies. It's time to bid adieu to this peculiar pursuit and turn our attention to other enigmatic correlations that await our scholarly scrutiny.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Breath of Fresh Air: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the Bailiff Boom in the Badger State. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Environmental Breezology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Breath of Fresh Air: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the Bailiff Boom in the Badger State. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Environmental Analysis (SQEA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Breath of Fresh Air: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the Bailiff Boom in the Badger State with an abstract of In this study, we delved into the curious connection between air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin and the number of bailiffs in the fine state of Wisconsin. With our research team's keen eye for correlation, we used data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to investigate this peculiar pairing. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.7265047 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning 2003 to 2021. Our results provide compelling evidence of a link between polluted air and the proliferation of bailiffs, shedding light on the unexpected influence of environmental factors on the legal system. Our research not only offers a breath of fresh air in the realm of interdisciplinary studies but also highlights the need for further examination of the far-reaching effects of air pollution.

ChatGPT:

Appleton Wisconsin, air pollution, bailiffs, Badger State, correlation, Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, legal system, environmental factors, interdisciplinary studies

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Appleton, WI
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin

The number of bailiffs in Wisconsin
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of bailiffs in Wisconsin
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of bailiffs in Wisconsin

Correlation r = 0.7265047 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5278091 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 52.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of bailiffs in Wisconsin) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin) over the 19 years from 2003 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00043. 0.0004270263751537885000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.73 in 0.043% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,342 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.41, 0.89 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin (Bad air quality days)23.456823.481836.734731.020432.936527.734431.955915.325722.442232.786927.671229.58917.955814.040112.885218.836615.890416.120226.4463
The number of bailiffs in Wisconsin (Bailiffs)240260320360300240250220250270260270200200190220180300280




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([23.4568,23.4818,36.7347,31.0204,32.9365,27.7344,31.9559,15.3257,22.4422,32.7869,27.6712,29.589,17.9558,14.0401,12.8852,18.8366,15.8904,16.1202,26.4463,])
array_2 = np.array([240,260,320,360,300,240,250,220,250,270,260,270,200,200,190,220,180,300,280,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Appleton, Wisconsin"
array_2_name = "The number of bailiffs in Wisconsin"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 2871 · Black Variable ID: 20275 · Red Variable ID: 16247
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0