about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,841 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Wind power generated in Kosovo and the second variable is Google searches for 'who is alexa'.  The chart goes from 2010 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The answer, my friend, is blowin' in the wind...of change. As the turbines turned, they sparked a newfound curiosity. Maybe people just wanted to know if Alexa had a 'renewable' energy about her. It seems like Kosovo's gust for clean energy really 'blew away' the competition in the search for Alexa's identity!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a cartoonish wind turbine farm in Kosovo with large, comically exaggerated wind turbines spinning gracefully in the wind. Surrounding the turbines, show curious people looking up at the turbines with puzzled expressions, while others can be seen searching on their smartphones with a look of intrigue. The scene should be lighthearted and humorous, capturing the unique moment of people relating the sound of the turbines to a virtual assistant. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Wind power generated in Kosovo and Google searches for 'who is alexa'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Oragami a meme Photorealism inspired by bauhaus a funny image you would see on reddit
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Wind power generated in Kosovo and Google searches for 'who is alexa', in the following situation: because as the wind turbines started spinning, it created a constant hum that reminded people of the popular virtual assistant, Alexa. This led to an increase in curiosity about who or what Alexa really is, prompting more Google searches on the topic.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Kosovo, the wind turbines spun gracefully, generating clean power while emitting a soothing hum. People, intrigued by the sound, began to wonder about its similarity to the virtual assistant, Alexa, and sparked an increase in Google searches for 'who is Alexa'.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In Kosovo, the wind turbines spun gracefully, generating clean power while emitting a soothing hum. People, intrigued by the sound, began to wonder about its similarity to the virtual assistant, Alexa, and sparked an increase in Google searches for 'who is Alexa'. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a cartoonish wind turbine farm in Kosovo with large, comically exaggerated wind turbines spinning gracefully in the wind. Surrounding the turbines, show curious people looking up at the turbines with puzzled expressions, while others can be seen searching on their smartphones with a look of intrigue. The scene should be lighthearted and humorous, capturing the unique moment of people relating the sound of the turbines to a virtual assistant.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Wind power generated in Kosovo caused who is alexa (Google searches for 'who is alexa') to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Relationship Between Wind Power Generation in Kosovo and the Curious Searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google

The Journal of Renewable Energy and Internet Curiosities

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Kosovo and Google searches for 'who is alexa'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9399127 and p < 0.01 for 2010 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Relationship Between Wind Power Generation in Kosovo and the Curious Searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the curious connection between the burgeoning wind power generation in Kosovo and the perplexing surge in searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google. The aim of this research is to investigate the unexplored relationship between the production of renewable energy and the internet users' fascination with the virtual assistant, Alexa. By employing a unique combination of Energy Information Administration data and Google Trends, we unravel a startling correlation between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9399127, significant at the p < 0.01 level, over the period spanning 2010 to 2021. Our results not only shed light on the peculiar interplay between wind power and internet curiosity but also highlight the whimsical nature of human behavior and its unexpected alignment with renewable energy sources.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Kosovo and Google searches for 'who is alexa'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Relationship Between Wind Power Generation in Kosovo and the Curious Searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the curious connection between the burgeoning wind power generation in Kosovo and the perplexing surge in searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google. The aim of this research is to investigate the unexplored relationship between the production of renewable energy and the internet users' fascination with the virtual assistant, Alexa. By employing a unique combination of Energy Information Administration data and Google Trends, we unravel a startling correlation between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9399127, significant at the p < 0.01 level, over the period spanning 2010 to 2021. Our results not only shed light on the peculiar interplay between wind power and internet curiosity but also highlight the whimsical nature of human behavior and its unexpected alignment with renewable energy sources.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

The landscape of renewable energy generation has witnessed a gust of change over the years, with wind power emerging as a leading contender in the quest for sustainable energy sources. Concurrently, the virtual world has seen an influx of queries regarding the enigmatic figure of "Alexa," the digital assistant made famous by a certain major tech company. However, despite the apparent disparity between these domains, our investigation aims to unravel the rather unexpected connection between the two: wind power generation in Kosovo and the increasingly curious searches for "Who is Alexa" on Google.

As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, it is imperative to acknowledge the significance of renewable energy in the global pursuit of environmental sustainability. The wind power sector, in particular, has been riding a veritable whirlwind of progress, harnessing the kinetic energy of the atmosphere to power homes and industries alike. Meanwhile, the virtual landscape has been abuzz with inquisitive minds seeking insights into the persona of Alexa, the epitome of artificial intelligence meets everyday convenience.

Nevertheless, one might be forgiven for harboring skepticism regarding any potential correlation between these incongruous realms. Yet, as the renowned physicist Niels Bohr once quipped, "If quantum mechanics hasn't profoundly shocked you, you haven't understood it yet." Evidently, the whims of correlation can defy conventional wisdom and leave researchers befuddled, much like a malfunctioning virtual assistant. Hence, our quest to unravel this peculiar linkage is not only an endeavor in academic curiosity but also a journey into the unexpected intersections of human behavior and technological innovation.

In this paper, we present our findings derived from a meticulous analysis of Energy Information Administration data and Google Trends, unveiling a correlation coefficient worthy of a raised eyebrow and further investigation. Despite the initial incredulity that such a connection could exist, our research brings to light the intriguing interplay between the sustainable hum of wind turbines and the digital echoes of "Who is Alexa" resonating across the web.

With this context in mind, we embark on a scholarly exploration into the uncharted territory where renewable energy production intersects with the quirks of online curiosity. As we unravel this unexpected correlation, we urge the reader to remain open to the whimsical dance of data, where the wind whispers its secrets, and internet searches lead us down unexpected paths.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Kosovo and Google searches for 'who is alexa'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Relationship Between Wind Power Generation in Kosovo and the Curious Searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the curious connection between the burgeoning wind power generation in Kosovo and the perplexing surge in searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google. The aim of this research is to investigate the unexplored relationship between the production of renewable energy and the internet users' fascination with the virtual assistant, Alexa. By employing a unique combination of Energy Information Administration data and Google Trends, we unravel a startling correlation between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9399127, significant at the p < 0.01 level, over the period spanning 2010 to 2021. Our results not only shed light on the peculiar interplay between wind power and internet curiosity but also highlight the whimsical nature of human behavior and its unexpected alignment with renewable energy sources.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The landscape of renewable energy generation has witnessed a gust of change over the years, with wind power emerging as a leading contender in the quest for sustainable energy sources. Concurrently, the virtual world has seen an influx of queries regarding the enigmatic figure of "Alexa," the digital assistant made famous by a certain major tech company. However, despite the apparent disparity between these domains, our investigation aims to unravel the rather unexpected connection between the two: wind power generation in Kosovo and the increasingly curious searches for "Who is Alexa" on Google.
As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, it is imperative to acknowledge the significance of renewable energy in the global pursuit of environmental sustainability. The wind power sector, in particular, has been riding a veritable whirlwind of progress, harnessing the kinetic energy of the atmosphere to power homes and industries alike. Meanwhile, the virtual landscape has been abuzz with inquisitive minds seeking insights into the persona of Alexa, the epitome of artificial intelligence meets everyday convenience.
Nevertheless, one might be forgiven for harboring skepticism regarding any potential correlation between these incongruous realms. Yet, as the renowned physicist Niels Bohr once quipped, "If quantum mechanics hasn't profoundly shocked you, you haven't understood it yet." Evidently, the whims of correlation can defy conventional wisdom and leave researchers befuddled, much like a malfunctioning virtual assistant. Hence, our quest to unravel this peculiar linkage is not only an endeavor in academic curiosity but also a journey into the unexpected intersections of human behavior and technological innovation.
In this paper, we present our findings derived from a meticulous analysis of Energy Information Administration data and Google Trends, unveiling a correlation coefficient worthy of a raised eyebrow and further investigation. Despite the initial incredulity that such a connection could exist, our research brings to light the intriguing interplay between the sustainable hum of wind turbines and the digital echoes of "Who is Alexa" resonating across the web.
With this context in mind, we embark on a scholarly exploration into the uncharted territory where renewable energy production intersects with the quirks of online curiosity. As we unravel this unexpected correlation, we urge the reader to remain open to the whimsical dance of data, where the wind whispers its secrets, and internet searches lead us down unexpected paths.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of the curious connection between wind power generation in Kosovo and the surge in Google searches for 'Who is Alexa' unveils a unique intersection between renewable energy and online curiosity. As we delve into the existing literature on renewable energy and online search behavior, we encounter a range of studies that provide valuable insights into related phenomena.

Smith et al. (2018) examined the social and environmental impacts of wind power generation, shedding light on its potential to mitigate carbon emissions and foster sustainable development. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2020) conducted a comprehensive analysis of public perception and attitudes toward renewable energy sources, highlighting the growing interest and support for wind power initiatives. These studies underscore the significance of renewable energy in addressing environmental concerns, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the unexpected link with internet searches for 'Who is Alexa'.

Turning to the broader context of technological innovation and societal curiosity, "The Age of Artificial Intelligence" by Expert and "The Digital Revolution" by Scholar offer extensive discussions on the transformative influence of digital assistants and the evolving landscape of human-machine interaction. In a more fictional realm, "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" by Sci-Fi Aficionado and "I, Robot" by Fiction Fanatic delve into the intricate dynamics between humans and artificial intelligence, depicting scenarios that may appear distant but have intriguing parallels with the sudden fascination with 'Who is Alexa'.

In the world of popular culture, the animated series "The Jetsons" and "The Future is Wild" feature imaginative depictions of futuristic technology and human curiosity, offering a lighthearted yet insightful perspective on the complexities of human fascination with technological advancements. Further, "Curious George" and "Dora the Explorer" illustrate the inquisitive nature of human behavior, where curiosity leads to unexpected discoveries—an apt parallel to the online queries about the enigmatic Alexa and its connection to wind power in Kosovo.

In light of the diverse literature spanning environmental sustainability, technology, and human curiosity, our exploration of the peculiar relationship between wind power generation and Google searches for 'Who is Alexa' is situated at the intriguing confluence of renewable energy innovation and internet-driven inquisitiveness. As we proceed to dissect this unexpected correlation, we draw inspiration from the insightful musings of scholars, fiction authors, and animated storytellers alike, recognizing the whimsical nature of human behavior and its fascinating alignment with renewable energy initiatives.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Kosovo and Google searches for 'who is alexa'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends . You used data from 2010 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Relationship Between Wind Power Generation in Kosovo and the Curious Searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the curious connection between the burgeoning wind power generation in Kosovo and the perplexing surge in searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google. The aim of this research is to investigate the unexplored relationship between the production of renewable energy and the internet users' fascination with the virtual assistant, Alexa. By employing a unique combination of Energy Information Administration data and Google Trends, we unravel a startling correlation between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9399127, significant at the p < 0.01 level, over the period spanning 2010 to 2021. Our results not only shed light on the peculiar interplay between wind power and internet curiosity but also highlight the whimsical nature of human behavior and its unexpected alignment with renewable energy sources.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The landscape of renewable energy generation has witnessed a gust of change over the years, with wind power emerging as a leading contender in the quest for sustainable energy sources. Concurrently, the virtual world has seen an influx of queries regarding the enigmatic figure of "Alexa," the digital assistant made famous by a certain major tech company. However, despite the apparent disparity between these domains, our investigation aims to unravel the rather unexpected connection between the two: wind power generation in Kosovo and the increasingly curious searches for "Who is Alexa" on Google.
As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, it is imperative to acknowledge the significance of renewable energy in the global pursuit of environmental sustainability. The wind power sector, in particular, has been riding a veritable whirlwind of progress, harnessing the kinetic energy of the atmosphere to power homes and industries alike. Meanwhile, the virtual landscape has been abuzz with inquisitive minds seeking insights into the persona of Alexa, the epitome of artificial intelligence meets everyday convenience.
Nevertheless, one might be forgiven for harboring skepticism regarding any potential correlation between these incongruous realms. Yet, as the renowned physicist Niels Bohr once quipped, "If quantum mechanics hasn't profoundly shocked you, you haven't understood it yet." Evidently, the whims of correlation can defy conventional wisdom and leave researchers befuddled, much like a malfunctioning virtual assistant. Hence, our quest to unravel this peculiar linkage is not only an endeavor in academic curiosity but also a journey into the unexpected intersections of human behavior and technological innovation.
In this paper, we present our findings derived from a meticulous analysis of Energy Information Administration data and Google Trends, unveiling a correlation coefficient worthy of a raised eyebrow and further investigation. Despite the initial incredulity that such a connection could exist, our research brings to light the intriguing interplay between the sustainable hum of wind turbines and the digital echoes of "Who is Alexa" resonating across the web.
With this context in mind, we embark on a scholarly exploration into the uncharted territory where renewable energy production intersects with the quirks of online curiosity. As we unravel this unexpected correlation, we urge the reader to remain open to the whimsical dance of data, where the wind whispers its secrets, and internet searches lead us down unexpected paths.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to untangle the enigmatic relationship between wind power generation in Kosovo and the surge in searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google, we employed a combination of data analysis techniques and statistical methodologies. Our research team meticulously gathered data from a variety of sources, but mostly just binged on information from the Energy Information Administration and got lost in the maze of Google Trends. The data under investigation spanned the period from 2010 to 2021, capturing the winds of change and the virtual echoes of curiosity over a substantial timeframe.

Data Collection
The process of data collection for this study involved traversing the virtual terrain of the internet, akin to embarking on an exhilarating quest through cyberspace. Our team harnessed the wealth of information available on the Energy Information Administration website, sifting through the gusts of data related to wind power generation in Kosovo. The information obtained from this esteemed source served as the cornerstone of our analysis, offering a comprehensive overview of the ebbs and flows in the production of wind energy over the years.

Furthermore, to capture the virtual echoes of intrigue surrounding the query "Who is Alexa," we turned to the digital oracle known as Google Trends. By delving into this repository of internet search data, we sought to gauge the intensity and frequency of searches related to Alexa, the enigmatic virtual assistant. As our team surfed the waves of Google Trends, we navigated through the fluctuations in search interest, seeking to uncover patterns that may have been obscured amidst the digital tumult.

Statistical Analysis
With the winds of information at our back, we set out to discern the potential relationship between wind power generation and the tide of searches for 'Who is Alexa' using rigorous statistical methods. Our analysis commenced with the computation of correlation coefficients to unravel the degree of association between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Through this statistical voyage, we aimed to gauge the strength and direction of the relationship, navigating the statistical waters with the precision of a seasoned navigator.

In addition to correlation analysis, we employed time series modeling to elucidate the temporal dynamics of the observed relationship. By harnessing the power of time series data, we endeavored to capture the ebb and flow of both wind power generation and Google searches for 'Who is Alexa' over the years under scrutiny. Our team huddled around the statistical hearth, scrutinizing the patterns that emerged from this analysis, seeking to unravel the underlying rhythms that may have eluded casual observation.

Importantly, to ensure the robustness of our findings, we subjected the observed relationships to rigorous hypothesis testing. Through the application of inferential statistics, we sought to ascertain the significance of the uncovered associations, probing the depths of statistical inference with the perseverance of intrepid explorers.

In combining these analytical approaches, our research sought to navigate the whims of data with precision, uncovering the unexpected correlations that often lie hidden in the winds of information. As we charted this methodological course, our team remained ever vigilant for the unexpected twists and turns that make the journey of scholarly inquiry both intellectually stimulating and occasionally surprising.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Kosovo and Google searches for 'who is alexa'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends .

For the time period 2010 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9399127, r-squared of 0.8834358, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Relationship Between Wind Power Generation in Kosovo and the Curious Searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the curious connection between the burgeoning wind power generation in Kosovo and the perplexing surge in searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google. The aim of this research is to investigate the unexplored relationship between the production of renewable energy and the internet users' fascination with the virtual assistant, Alexa. By employing a unique combination of Energy Information Administration data and Google Trends, we unravel a startling correlation between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9399127, significant at the p < 0.01 level, over the period spanning 2010 to 2021. Our results not only shed light on the peculiar interplay between wind power and internet curiosity but also highlight the whimsical nature of human behavior and its unexpected alignment with renewable energy sources.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The landscape of renewable energy generation has witnessed a gust of change over the years, with wind power emerging as a leading contender in the quest for sustainable energy sources. Concurrently, the virtual world has seen an influx of queries regarding the enigmatic figure of "Alexa," the digital assistant made famous by a certain major tech company. However, despite the apparent disparity between these domains, our investigation aims to unravel the rather unexpected connection between the two: wind power generation in Kosovo and the increasingly curious searches for "Who is Alexa" on Google.
As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, it is imperative to acknowledge the significance of renewable energy in the global pursuit of environmental sustainability. The wind power sector, in particular, has been riding a veritable whirlwind of progress, harnessing the kinetic energy of the atmosphere to power homes and industries alike. Meanwhile, the virtual landscape has been abuzz with inquisitive minds seeking insights into the persona of Alexa, the epitome of artificial intelligence meets everyday convenience.
Nevertheless, one might be forgiven for harboring skepticism regarding any potential correlation between these incongruous realms. Yet, as the renowned physicist Niels Bohr once quipped, "If quantum mechanics hasn't profoundly shocked you, you haven't understood it yet." Evidently, the whims of correlation can defy conventional wisdom and leave researchers befuddled, much like a malfunctioning virtual assistant. Hence, our quest to unravel this peculiar linkage is not only an endeavor in academic curiosity but also a journey into the unexpected intersections of human behavior and technological innovation.
In this paper, we present our findings derived from a meticulous analysis of Energy Information Administration data and Google Trends, unveiling a correlation coefficient worthy of a raised eyebrow and further investigation. Despite the initial incredulity that such a connection could exist, our research brings to light the intriguing interplay between the sustainable hum of wind turbines and the digital echoes of "Who is Alexa" resonating across the web.
With this context in mind, we embark on a scholarly exploration into the uncharted territory where renewable energy production intersects with the quirks of online curiosity. As we unravel this unexpected correlation, we urge the reader to remain open to the whimsical dance of data, where the wind whispers its secrets, and internet searches lead us down unexpected paths.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The primary aim of our study was to examine the relationship between wind power generation in Kosovo and the intriguing surge in searches for "Who is Alexa" on Google. Through our analysis of the data spanning from 2010 to 2021, we observed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9399127 between these seemingly unrelated variables. This coefficient is nearly as reliable as that one friend who always shows up on time, and it is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8834358, indicating that approximately 88.34% of the variation in "Who is Alexa" searches can be attributed to wind power generation. In simpler terms, these results suggest a connection more potent than a swift breeze whispering through the search engine algorithms.

To illustrate this correlation visually, we have included a scatterplot (Fig. 1) that unmistakably portrays the robust relationship between wind power generation and Google searches for "Who is Alexa." The data points on the plot align more closely than synchronized swimmers, leaving little doubt about the link between these two seemingly disparate phenomena.

Futhermore, a p-value of less than 0.01 adds statistical weight to our findings, indicating that the observed relationship between wind power generation and searches for "Who is Alexa" is not just a random, gusty coincidence but a robust and reliable association. In fact, the strength of this relationship is about as surprising as stumbling upon a well-concealed easter egg in a complex video game.

These results not only challenge conventional expectations but also advocate for a broader consideration of the nuanced ways in which human curiosity intersects with sustainable energy endeavors. The whims of internet searches, much like the capricious wind, seem to align with renewable energy generation in Kosovo, presenting an unforeseen synergy that raises intriguing questions about the dynamics of human behavior in the digital age.

In summary, our findings disclose a remarkable correlation between wind power generation and Google searches for "Who is Alexa," offering a glimpse into the distinctive interconnection of seemingly unrelated domains. This interplay underscores the capricious nature of human curiosity and its unexpected convergence with sustainable energy sources.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Kosovo and Google searches for 'who is alexa'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Relationship Between Wind Power Generation in Kosovo and the Curious Searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the curious connection between the burgeoning wind power generation in Kosovo and the perplexing surge in searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google. The aim of this research is to investigate the unexplored relationship between the production of renewable energy and the internet users' fascination with the virtual assistant, Alexa. By employing a unique combination of Energy Information Administration data and Google Trends, we unravel a startling correlation between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9399127, significant at the p < 0.01 level, over the period spanning 2010 to 2021. Our results not only shed light on the peculiar interplay between wind power and internet curiosity but also highlight the whimsical nature of human behavior and its unexpected alignment with renewable energy sources.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the curious connection between wind power generation in Kosovo and the surge in Google searches for 'Who is Alexa' unveils a unique intersection between renewable energy and online curiosity. As we delve into the existing literature on renewable energy and online search behavior, we encounter a range of studies that provide valuable insights into related phenomena.
Smith et al. (2018) examined the social and environmental impacts of wind power generation, shedding light on its potential to mitigate carbon emissions and foster sustainable development. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2020) conducted a comprehensive analysis of public perception and attitudes toward renewable energy sources, highlighting the growing interest and support for wind power initiatives. These studies underscore the significance of renewable energy in addressing environmental concerns, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the unexpected link with internet searches for 'Who is Alexa'.
Turning to the broader context of technological innovation and societal curiosity, "The Age of Artificial Intelligence" by Expert and "The Digital Revolution" by Scholar offer extensive discussions on the transformative influence of digital assistants and the evolving landscape of human-machine interaction. In a more fictional realm, "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" by Sci-Fi Aficionado and "I, Robot" by Fiction Fanatic delve into the intricate dynamics between humans and artificial intelligence, depicting scenarios that may appear distant but have intriguing parallels with the sudden fascination with 'Who is Alexa'.
In the world of popular culture, the animated series "The Jetsons" and "The Future is Wild" feature imaginative depictions of futuristic technology and human curiosity, offering a lighthearted yet insightful perspective on the complexities of human fascination with technological advancements. Further, "Curious George" and "Dora the Explorer" illustrate the inquisitive nature of human behavior, where curiosity leads to unexpected discoveries—an apt parallel to the online queries about the enigmatic Alexa and its connection to wind power in Kosovo.
In light of the diverse literature spanning environmental sustainability, technology, and human curiosity, our exploration of the peculiar relationship between wind power generation and Google searches for 'Who is Alexa' is situated at the intriguing confluence of renewable energy innovation and internet-driven inquisitiveness. As we proceed to dissect this unexpected correlation, we draw inspiration from the insightful musings of scholars, fiction authors, and animated storytellers alike, recognizing the whimsical nature of human behavior and its fascinating alignment with renewable energy initiatives.

[[RESULTS]]
The primary aim of our study was to examine the relationship between wind power generation in Kosovo and the intriguing surge in searches for "Who is Alexa" on Google. Through our analysis of the data spanning from 2010 to 2021, we observed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9399127 between these seemingly unrelated variables. This coefficient is nearly as reliable as that one friend who always shows up on time, and it is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8834358, indicating that approximately 88.34% of the variation in "Who is Alexa" searches can be attributed to wind power generation. In simpler terms, these results suggest a connection more potent than a swift breeze whispering through the search engine algorithms.
To illustrate this correlation visually, we have included a scatterplot (Fig. 1) that unmistakably portrays the robust relationship between wind power generation and Google searches for "Who is Alexa." The data points on the plot align more closely than synchronized swimmers, leaving little doubt about the link between these two seemingly disparate phenomena.
Futhermore, a p-value of less than 0.01 adds statistical weight to our findings, indicating that the observed relationship between wind power generation and searches for "Who is Alexa" is not just a random, gusty coincidence but a robust and reliable association. In fact, the strength of this relationship is about as surprising as stumbling upon a well-concealed easter egg in a complex video game.
These results not only challenge conventional expectations but also advocate for a broader consideration of the nuanced ways in which human curiosity intersects with sustainable energy endeavors. The whims of internet searches, much like the capricious wind, seem to align with renewable energy generation in Kosovo, presenting an unforeseen synergy that raises intriguing questions about the dynamics of human behavior in the digital age.
In summary, our findings disclose a remarkable correlation between wind power generation and Google searches for "Who is Alexa," offering a glimpse into the distinctive interconnection of seemingly unrelated domains. This interplay underscores the capricious nature of human curiosity and its unexpected convergence with sustainable energy sources.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation divulge a remarkable and robust correlation between wind power generation in Kosovo and the surge in Google searches for "Who is Alexa." This unexpected relationship underscores the intricate interplay of seemingly unrelated domains, shedding light on the curious alignment of human curiosity with sustainable energy initiatives. Our findings corroborate prior research on renewable energy and societal attitudes, while also elucidating an unforeseen connection with digital curiosity.

Smith et al. (2018) highlighted the potential of wind power generation to mitigate carbon emissions and foster sustainable development, which aligns with our observation of a strong association between wind power production and heightened interest in Alexa. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9399127 substantiates the unforeseen connection, akin to how a gust of wind can unexpectedly carry one's hat away. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.8834358 underscores the substantial influence of wind power generation on Google searches for "Who is Alexa," reminiscent of how a consistent breeze can swiftly influence a kite's flight path.

While the connection between wind power in Kosovo and internet curiosity may appear whimsical at first glance, our results accentuate the intriguing interplay of human behavior and renewable energy sources. This unforeseen synergy underscores the capricious nature of online queries and their alignment with sustainable energy initiatives, akin to how a gentle gust can unexpectedly steer a sailboat.

Our study raises thought-provoking questions about the pervasive influence of human curiosity and its unexpected convergence with sustainable energy sources. It also advocates for a greater appreciation of the nuanced ways in which digital inquisitiveness intertwines with renewable energy innovations, challenging conventional expectations and inviting further exploration. Just as the wind's direction can shift unexpectedly, so too can our understanding of the intricate dynamics between human behavior and renewable energy in the digital age.

The unexpected correlation unearthed in this study paves the way for future research into the unexplored connections between societal curiosity and sustainable energy initiatives, underscoring the whimsical nature of human behavior and its potential to intersect with renewable energy endeavors in surprising ways. Our findings not only illuminate the nuanced interplay between wind power generation and online searches for "Who is Alexa" but also beckon for continued exploration of the captivating and unanticipated intersections between diverse domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Wind power generated in Kosovo and Google searches for 'who is alexa'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Relationship Between Wind Power Generation in Kosovo and the Curious Searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the curious connection between the burgeoning wind power generation in Kosovo and the perplexing surge in searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google. The aim of this research is to investigate the unexplored relationship between the production of renewable energy and the internet users' fascination with the virtual assistant, Alexa. By employing a unique combination of Energy Information Administration data and Google Trends, we unravel a startling correlation between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9399127, significant at the p < 0.01 level, over the period spanning 2010 to 2021. Our results not only shed light on the peculiar interplay between wind power and internet curiosity but also highlight the whimsical nature of human behavior and its unexpected alignment with renewable energy sources.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The landscape of renewable energy generation has witnessed a gust of change over the years, with wind power emerging as a leading contender in the quest for sustainable energy sources. Concurrently, the virtual world has seen an influx of queries regarding the enigmatic figure of "Alexa," the digital assistant made famous by a certain major tech company. However, despite the apparent disparity between these domains, our investigation aims to unravel the rather unexpected connection between the two: wind power generation in Kosovo and the increasingly curious searches for "Who is Alexa" on Google.
As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, it is imperative to acknowledge the significance of renewable energy in the global pursuit of environmental sustainability. The wind power sector, in particular, has been riding a veritable whirlwind of progress, harnessing the kinetic energy of the atmosphere to power homes and industries alike. Meanwhile, the virtual landscape has been abuzz with inquisitive minds seeking insights into the persona of Alexa, the epitome of artificial intelligence meets everyday convenience.
Nevertheless, one might be forgiven for harboring skepticism regarding any potential correlation between these incongruous realms. Yet, as the renowned physicist Niels Bohr once quipped, "If quantum mechanics hasn't profoundly shocked you, you haven't understood it yet." Evidently, the whims of correlation can defy conventional wisdom and leave researchers befuddled, much like a malfunctioning virtual assistant. Hence, our quest to unravel this peculiar linkage is not only an endeavor in academic curiosity but also a journey into the unexpected intersections of human behavior and technological innovation.
In this paper, we present our findings derived from a meticulous analysis of Energy Information Administration data and Google Trends, unveiling a correlation coefficient worthy of a raised eyebrow and further investigation. Despite the initial incredulity that such a connection could exist, our research brings to light the intriguing interplay between the sustainable hum of wind turbines and the digital echoes of "Who is Alexa" resonating across the web.
With this context in mind, we embark on a scholarly exploration into the uncharted territory where renewable energy production intersects with the quirks of online curiosity. As we unravel this unexpected correlation, we urge the reader to remain open to the whimsical dance of data, where the wind whispers its secrets, and internet searches lead us down unexpected paths.


[[RESULTS]]
The primary aim of our study was to examine the relationship between wind power generation in Kosovo and the intriguing surge in searches for "Who is Alexa" on Google. Through our analysis of the data spanning from 2010 to 2021, we observed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9399127 between these seemingly unrelated variables. This coefficient is nearly as reliable as that one friend who always shows up on time, and it is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8834358, indicating that approximately 88.34% of the variation in "Who is Alexa" searches can be attributed to wind power generation. In simpler terms, these results suggest a connection more potent than a swift breeze whispering through the search engine algorithms.
To illustrate this correlation visually, we have included a scatterplot (Fig. 1) that unmistakably portrays the robust relationship between wind power generation and Google searches for "Who is Alexa." The data points on the plot align more closely than synchronized swimmers, leaving little doubt about the link between these two seemingly disparate phenomena.
Futhermore, a p-value of less than 0.01 adds statistical weight to our findings, indicating that the observed relationship between wind power generation and searches for "Who is Alexa" is not just a random, gusty coincidence but a robust and reliable association. In fact, the strength of this relationship is about as surprising as stumbling upon a well-concealed easter egg in a complex video game.
These results not only challenge conventional expectations but also advocate for a broader consideration of the nuanced ways in which human curiosity intersects with sustainable energy endeavors. The whims of internet searches, much like the capricious wind, seem to align with renewable energy generation in Kosovo, presenting an unforeseen synergy that raises intriguing questions about the dynamics of human behavior in the digital age.
In summary, our findings disclose a remarkable correlation between wind power generation and Google searches for "Who is Alexa," offering a glimpse into the distinctive interconnection of seemingly unrelated domains. This interplay underscores the capricious nature of human curiosity and its unexpected convergence with sustainable energy sources.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unwrapped a remarkable correlation between wind power generation in Kosovo and the inexplicable surge in searches for "Who is Alexa" on Google. The robust correlation coefficient and significant p-value provide compelling evidence for the unexpected interplay between these seemingly disparate domains. The strength of this relationship is as surprising as discovering a forgotten slice of pizza in the back of the fridge - unexpected, yet undeniably satisfying. Our results not only highlight the whimsical nature of human behavior but also underscore the intricate dance between internet curiosity and sustainable energy initiatives. It's as if the wind itself is whispering the queries into the search bar, urging users to ponder the enigma of Alexa whilst it generates renewable power.

Overall, our findings lend credence to the notion that the whims of internet searches can align with the sustainable hum of wind turbines, painting a picture of unexpected harmony between the virtual and the tangible. As such, we implore future researchers to consider the quirky connections that underpin human behavior and to embrace the capricious nature of data analysis. As for the connection between wind power generation and 'Who is Alexa' searches, it seems clear that no more research is needed in this area. After all, some mysteries are best left blowing in the wind.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Relationship Between Wind Power Generation in Kosovo and the Curious Searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Renewable Energy and Internet Curiosities


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Relationship Between Wind Power Generation in Kosovo and the Curious Searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Energy Efficiency and Balkan Internet Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blowing in the Wind: Unveiling the Relationship Between Wind Power Generation in Kosovo and the Curious Searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google with an abstract of Our study delves into the curious connection between the burgeoning wind power generation in Kosovo and the perplexing surge in searches for 'Who is Alexa' on Google. The aim of this research is to investigate the unexplored relationship between the production of renewable energy and the internet users' fascination with the virtual assistant, Alexa. By employing a unique combination of Energy Information Administration data and Google Trends, we unravel a startling correlation between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9399127, significant at the p < 0.01 level, over the period spanning 2010 to 2021. Our results not only shed light on the peculiar interplay between wind power and internet curiosity but also highlight the whimsical nature of human behavior and its unexpected alignment with renewable energy sources.

ChatGPT:

wind power generation, Kosovo, renewable energy, Google search trends, correlation, Energy Information Administration data, internet curiosity, virtual assistant, Alexa

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Wind power generated in Kosovo
Detailed data title: Total wind power generated in Kosovo in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in Kosovo

Google searches for 'who is alexa'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'who is alexa' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'who is alexa'

Correlation r = 0.9399127 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8834358 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'who is alexa') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Wind power generated in Kosovo) over the 12 years from 2010 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.6E-6. 0.0000055740215178786560000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 0.00056% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 179,404 random variables You don't actually need 179 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Wind power generated in Kosovo (Billion kWh)0.0010.0030.0030.0030.0030.0030.0030.0030.030.0910.090.09
Google searches for 'who is alexa' (Rel. search volume)12.583314.083314.083313.333313.7518.2513.916726.833345.416749.2567.333367.5




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.001,0.003,0.003,0.003,0.003,0.003,0.003,0.003,0.03,0.091,0.09,0.09,])
array_2 = np.array([12.5833,14.0833,14.0833,13.3333,13.75,18.25,13.9167,26.8333,45.4167,49.25,67.3333,67.5,])
array_1_name = "Wind power generated in Kosovo"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'who is alexa'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 2841 · Black Variable ID: 23775 · Red Variable ID: 1461
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0