about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,840 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Hydopower energy generated in Fiji and the second variable is Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion.  The chart goes from 1983 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As hydroelectric power production in Fiji rises, the majestic waterfalls exude a faint, mouthwatering aroma of sizzling hotdogs. This aromatic mist wafts its way across the Pacific, inspiring the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion to consume record numbers of hotdogs in a display of hydro-powered appetite. It's a truly electrifying connection between renewable energy and competitive eating!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a cyberpunk cityscape with towering skyscrapers and neon lights, juxtaposed against a breathtaking natural landscape of Fiji's lush mountains and cascading waterfalls. In the foreground, a larger-than-life figure of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion is shown, surrounded by swirling energy patterns that emanate from the hydroelectric turbines. He's depicted with a mischievous yet satisfied expression, playfully adding splashes of electric blue water to a towering stack of hotdogs. The scene is infused with a sense of powerful, interconnected energy, as the city and nature interact in an otherworldly and cyber folk-inspired fusion. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Hydopower energy generated in Fiji and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Art nouveau Cute 2D animation Cyber folk An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie a meme
ChatGPT: Cyber folk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Hydopower energy generated in Fiji and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, in the following situation: As the hydroelectric power in Fiji increased, so did the flow of energy in the universe, leading to a spike in hotdog consumption by the Champion. The power of water energy just relished the opportunity to beef up his appetite!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Fiji, powerful waterfalls cascade down the mountains, turning massive water turbines and generating hydroelectric energy. The energy flows outwards, creating ripples throughout the universe. In the bustling streets of New York, the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion eagerly devours an increasing number of hotdogs, relishing each one with a satisfied grin. The surge of hydroelectric power seems to fuel his insatiable appetite, as he playfully garnishes each hotdog with a splash of water, savoring both the energy and the flavor.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyber folk ] and depicting this scene: In Fiji, powerful waterfalls cascade down the mountains, turning massive water turbines and generating hydroelectric energy. The energy flows outwards, creating ripples throughout the universe. In the bustling streets of New York, the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion eagerly devours an increasing number of hotdogs, relishing each one with a satisfied grin. The surge of hydroelectric power seems to fuel his insatiable appetite, as he playfully garnishes each hotdog with a splash of water, savoring both the energy and the flavor. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a cyberpunk cityscape with towering skyscrapers and neon lights, juxtaposed against a breathtaking natural landscape of Fiji's lush mountains and cascading waterfalls. In the foreground, a larger-than-life figure of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion is shown, surrounded by swirling energy patterns that emanate from the hydroelectric turbines. He's depicted with a mischievous yet satisfied expression, playfully adding splashes of electric blue water to a towering stack of hotdogs. The scene is infused with a sense of powerful, interconnected energy, as the city and nature interact in an otherworldly and cyber folk-inspired fusion.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Hydopower energy generated in Fiji caused Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Hydropower Hours and Nathan's Devour: A Power-Dog Connection Dissection

Journal of Canine Power Dynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Fiji and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7056202 and p < 0.01 for 1983 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Hydropower Hours and Nathan's Devour: A Power-Dog Connection Dissection

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the number of hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has been a topic of speculative curiosity. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, this study examines the dynamic connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.7056202 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1983 to 2021, suggesting a peculiar association between the two variables. It seems that when it comes to hotdogs, the key may lie in the flow of hydroelectric power! Our research offers insight into this unexpected link, leaving some food for thought and perhaps a mustard of hypotheses. As the saying goes, "You can't have a hotdog without the doggone hydro power!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Fiji and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Hydropower Hours and Nathan's Devour: A Power-Dog Connection Dissection

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the number of hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has been a topic of speculative curiosity. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, this study examines the dynamic connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.7056202 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1983 to 2021, suggesting a peculiar association between the two variables. It seems that when it comes to hotdogs, the key may lie in the flow of hydroelectric power! Our research offers insight into this unexpected link, leaving some food for thought and perhaps a mustard of hypotheses. As the saying goes, "You can't have a hotdog without the doggone hydro power!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The interplay between energy production and consumption has long been a subject of extensive study, but rarely does it extend to the realm of competitive eating. Nonetheless, in our research, we have delved into the peculiar relationship between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the insatiable appetite of the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.

Now, hold onto your buns for this one! It's not every day that hydropower and hotdogs share the spotlight, but as we dive into the data, you'll see that there's more to this connection than meets the mustard.

The puns are as abundant as hotdogs at a summer cookout, and the stakes are as high as the cholesterol levels after a hotdog-eating contest! This research aims to shed light on the unexpected bond between hydroelectric power and the champion hotdog devourer.

As we unpack this peculiar pairing, we hope to tease out the sausages of truth from the buns of speculation. One might say we're on a roll with this investigation!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Fiji and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Hydropower Hours and Nathan's Devour: A Power-Dog Connection Dissection

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the number of hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has been a topic of speculative curiosity. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, this study examines the dynamic connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.7056202 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1983 to 2021, suggesting a peculiar association between the two variables. It seems that when it comes to hotdogs, the key may lie in the flow of hydroelectric power! Our research offers insight into this unexpected link, leaving some food for thought and perhaps a mustard of hypotheses. As the saying goes, "You can't have a hotdog without the doggone hydro power!"

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between energy production and consumption has long been a subject of extensive study, but rarely does it extend to the realm of competitive eating. Nonetheless, in our research, we have delved into the peculiar relationship between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the insatiable appetite of the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.
Now, hold onto your buns for this one! It's not every day that hydropower and hotdogs share the spotlight, but as we dive into the data, you'll see that there's more to this connection than meets the mustard.
The puns are as abundant as hotdogs at a summer cookout, and the stakes are as high as the cholesterol levels after a hotdog-eating contest! This research aims to shed light on the unexpected bond between hydroelectric power and the champion hotdog devourer.
As we unpack this peculiar pairing, we hope to tease out the sausages of truth from the buns of speculation. One might say we're on a roll with this investigation!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith and Jones," the authors find that hydropower energy production in Fiji has been a subject of significant interest due to its potential impact on global energy markets. The study delves into the technical aspects of hydropower infrastructure and its role in the broader context of renewable energy sources. However, the authors do not mention any correlation between hydropower energy and hotdog consumption, failing to recognize the sizzling link between the two.

Moving from the serious to the speculative, in "Doe et al.," the authors explore the cultural significance of competitive eating events and their influence on consumer behavior. While the study offers valuable insights into the psychology of food consumption, it neglects to consider the potential influence of hydropower energy on the champion's hotdog intake. It seems that the authors missed the opportunity to bridge the gap between hydroelectric power and the champion's voracious appetite.

On the non-fiction front, relevant readings include "The Big Necessity: The Unmentionable World of Human Waste and Why It Matters" by Rose George and "Eating on the Wild Side: The Missing Link to Optimum Health" by Jo Robinson. While these books may not directly address the connection between hydropower energy and hotdog consumption, they add flavor to the interdisciplinary exploration of environmental and dietary factors.

In the realm of fiction, "Water for Elephants" by Sara Gruen and "The Catcher in the Rye" by J.D. Salinger offer imaginative perspectives on water-related themes and the complexities of human consumption, albeit lacking in direct references to hotdog-eating champions. Nonetheless, these literary works contribute a literary relish to our interdisciplinary investigation.

On the small screen, food enthusiasts may find inspiration in TV shows such as "Man v. Food," "Top Chef," and "Mystery Science Theater 3000." While these programs do not specifically address the nexus between hydropower energy and hotdog consumption, they offer a tasting menu of culinary exploration and entertainment that may leave viewers hungry for more insights into this unusual connection.

As we navigate through the literature, it becomes evident that the fusion of hydropower energy in Fiji and the consumption of hotdogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has yet to receive the attention it deserves. Our research aims to fill this gap, bringing the power-dog connection to the forefront and shedding light on this uncharted territory. After all, when it comes to research, we relish the opportunity to uncover unexpected correlations and serve them up with a side of humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Fiji and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia . You used data from 1983 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Hydropower Hours and Nathan's Devour: A Power-Dog Connection Dissection

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the number of hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has been a topic of speculative curiosity. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, this study examines the dynamic connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.7056202 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1983 to 2021, suggesting a peculiar association between the two variables. It seems that when it comes to hotdogs, the key may lie in the flow of hydroelectric power! Our research offers insight into this unexpected link, leaving some food for thought and perhaps a mustard of hypotheses. As the saying goes, "You can't have a hotdog without the doggone hydro power!"

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between energy production and consumption has long been a subject of extensive study, but rarely does it extend to the realm of competitive eating. Nonetheless, in our research, we have delved into the peculiar relationship between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the insatiable appetite of the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.
Now, hold onto your buns for this one! It's not every day that hydropower and hotdogs share the spotlight, but as we dive into the data, you'll see that there's more to this connection than meets the mustard.
The puns are as abundant as hotdogs at a summer cookout, and the stakes are as high as the cholesterol levels after a hotdog-eating contest! This research aims to shed light on the unexpected bond between hydroelectric power and the champion hotdog devourer.
As we unpack this peculiar pairing, we hope to tease out the sausages of truth from the buns of speculation. One might say we're on a roll with this investigation!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the intriguing relationship between hydropower energy in Fiji and hotdog consumption by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, our research team employed a combination of quantitative analysis, web scraping, and a pinch of humor. Yes, you heard that right - we stirred in some puns and dad jokes to keep things light-hearted. After all, we wouldn't want to leave our readers feeling like they've been served a cold hotdog!

Data on hydropower energy production in Fiji was collected from the Energy Information Administration, while information on the number of hotdogs consumed by the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champion was obtained from the depths of Wikipedia. We then carefully sifted through the data with the precision of a hotdog vendor crafting a perfect frankfurter.

Now, as you can imagine, the process of quantifying the link between these two seemingly disparate variables required some innovative approaches. Through the creative application of statistical techniques and neural network analysis, we endeavored to peel back the layers of this unusual pairing and reveal the meaty insights beneath.

In addition to harnessing the power of traditional statistical methods, we also embraced a more unorthodox approach by exploring the influence of celestial phenomena on hotdog consumption and hydropower energy production. We examined lunar phases, solar flares, and even the gravitational pull of Jupiter, because when it comes to unraveling mystery links, we prefer to leave no bun unturned.

Furthermore, to add an extra twist to our analysis, we incorporated a dash of quantum physics, pondering whether the entanglement of particles at the quantum level could play a role in the synchronous fluctuations of hydropower energy and hotdog consumption. At this point, you might be wondering if we've gone a bit off the deep end, but rest assured, our methods were as carefully crafted as a gourmet hotdog with all the fixings!

Lastly, to ensure the robustness of our findings, we applied a rigorous sensitivity analysis to assess the impact of potential confounding variables such as global warming, international hotdog trends, and the rise of vegetarian alternatives. We wanted to make sure we weren't just grasping at straws - or should I say, at sausages?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Fiji and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1983 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7056202, r-squared of 0.4978998, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Hydropower Hours and Nathan's Devour: A Power-Dog Connection Dissection

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the number of hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has been a topic of speculative curiosity. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, this study examines the dynamic connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.7056202 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1983 to 2021, suggesting a peculiar association between the two variables. It seems that when it comes to hotdogs, the key may lie in the flow of hydroelectric power! Our research offers insight into this unexpected link, leaving some food for thought and perhaps a mustard of hypotheses. As the saying goes, "You can't have a hotdog without the doggone hydro power!"

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The interplay between energy production and consumption has long been a subject of extensive study, but rarely does it extend to the realm of competitive eating. Nonetheless, in our research, we have delved into the peculiar relationship between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the insatiable appetite of the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.
Now, hold onto your buns for this one! It's not every day that hydropower and hotdogs share the spotlight, but as we dive into the data, you'll see that there's more to this connection than meets the mustard.
The puns are as abundant as hotdogs at a summer cookout, and the stakes are as high as the cholesterol levels after a hotdog-eating contest! This research aims to shed light on the unexpected bond between hydroelectric power and the champion hotdog devourer.
As we unpack this peculiar pairing, we hope to tease out the sausages of truth from the buns of speculation. One might say we're on a roll with this investigation!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the number of hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The correlation coefficient of 0.7056202 indicated a moderately strong relationship between the two variables. This suggests that as the hydropower energy production in Fiji increased, so did the number of hotdogs devoured by the champion.

The r-squared value of 0.4978998 further supported the relationship, indicating that approximately 49.8% of the variability in hotdog consumption by the champion can be explained by the variability in hydropower energy generation in Fiji. We might say that there's more than just a mere "relish" at play here!

The p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is unlikely to be a result of random chance. In other words, the association between hydropower energy and hotdog consumption is statistically significant. It seems that when it comes to competitive eating, the hydroelectric power may have an unexpected sway. One could even say it's a "watt" of a surprise!

Fig. 1 captures the essence of this connection in a scatterplot, illustrating the clear, upward trend between the two variables. The plot leaves little room for doubt, and one might even say it's as convincing as a well-dressed hotdog!

Overall, the findings of this study provide compelling evidence of a tangible link between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the consumption of hotdogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. This unanticipated alliance between hydroelectric power and competitive eating offers food for thought, serving up a platter of unexpected connections and prompting further investigation into the power-dog dynamic. One might say it's a real "wiener" in the world of energy and gastronomic research!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Fiji and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Hydropower Hours and Nathan's Devour: A Power-Dog Connection Dissection

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the number of hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has been a topic of speculative curiosity. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, this study examines the dynamic connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.7056202 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1983 to 2021, suggesting a peculiar association between the two variables. It seems that when it comes to hotdogs, the key may lie in the flow of hydroelectric power! Our research offers insight into this unexpected link, leaving some food for thought and perhaps a mustard of hypotheses. As the saying goes, "You can't have a hotdog without the doggone hydro power!"

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith and Jones," the authors find that hydropower energy production in Fiji has been a subject of significant interest due to its potential impact on global energy markets. The study delves into the technical aspects of hydropower infrastructure and its role in the broader context of renewable energy sources. However, the authors do not mention any correlation between hydropower energy and hotdog consumption, failing to recognize the sizzling link between the two.
Moving from the serious to the speculative, in "Doe et al.," the authors explore the cultural significance of competitive eating events and their influence on consumer behavior. While the study offers valuable insights into the psychology of food consumption, it neglects to consider the potential influence of hydropower energy on the champion's hotdog intake. It seems that the authors missed the opportunity to bridge the gap between hydroelectric power and the champion's voracious appetite.
On the non-fiction front, relevant readings include "The Big Necessity: The Unmentionable World of Human Waste and Why It Matters" by Rose George and "Eating on the Wild Side: The Missing Link to Optimum Health" by Jo Robinson. While these books may not directly address the connection between hydropower energy and hotdog consumption, they add flavor to the interdisciplinary exploration of environmental and dietary factors.
In the realm of fiction, "Water for Elephants" by Sara Gruen and "The Catcher in the Rye" by J.D. Salinger offer imaginative perspectives on water-related themes and the complexities of human consumption, albeit lacking in direct references to hotdog-eating champions. Nonetheless, these literary works contribute a literary relish to our interdisciplinary investigation.
On the small screen, food enthusiasts may find inspiration in TV shows such as "Man v. Food," "Top Chef," and "Mystery Science Theater 3000." While these programs do not specifically address the nexus between hydropower energy and hotdog consumption, they offer a tasting menu of culinary exploration and entertainment that may leave viewers hungry for more insights into this unusual connection.
As we navigate through the literature, it becomes evident that the fusion of hydropower energy in Fiji and the consumption of hotdogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has yet to receive the attention it deserves. Our research aims to fill this gap, bringing the power-dog connection to the forefront and shedding light on this uncharted territory. After all, when it comes to research, we relish the opportunity to uncover unexpected correlations and serve them up with a side of humor.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the number of hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The correlation coefficient of 0.7056202 indicated a moderately strong relationship between the two variables. This suggests that as the hydropower energy production in Fiji increased, so did the number of hotdogs devoured by the champion.
The r-squared value of 0.4978998 further supported the relationship, indicating that approximately 49.8% of the variability in hotdog consumption by the champion can be explained by the variability in hydropower energy generation in Fiji. We might say that there's more than just a mere "relish" at play here!
The p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is unlikely to be a result of random chance. In other words, the association between hydropower energy and hotdog consumption is statistically significant. It seems that when it comes to competitive eating, the hydroelectric power may have an unexpected sway. One could even say it's a "watt" of a surprise!
Fig. 1 captures the essence of this connection in a scatterplot, illustrating the clear, upward trend between the two variables. The plot leaves little room for doubt, and one might even say it's as convincing as a well-dressed hotdog!
Overall, the findings of this study provide compelling evidence of a tangible link between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the consumption of hotdogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. This unanticipated alliance between hydroelectric power and competitive eating offers food for thought, serving up a platter of unexpected connections and prompting further investigation into the power-dog dynamic. One might say it's a real "wiener" in the world of energy and gastronomic research!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study solidify the previously speculative notion of a connection between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the number of hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. It appears that the positive correlation observed indicates a genuine relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. It seems that when it comes to competitive eating, the influence of hydropower energy may be more than just a "current" trend!

The findings of this study build upon the work of Smith and Jones, who emphasized the significance of hydropower energy production in Fiji within the global energy landscape. While they did not directly consider the impact of this energy source on hotdog consumption, our results suggest that the ramifications of hydropower extend beyond conventional economic metrics, reaching into the world of competitive eating. One might say that the link between hydropower and hotdog consumption is nothing to "water" down!

Furthermore, our research offers a supportive nod to the work of Doe et al., who delved into the psychological aspects of competitive eating. Although their study did not explicitly explore the role of hydropower energy, our findings hint at a potential influence that adds a splash of intrigue to the champion's hotdog-devouring prowess. One might say that the "flow" of hydropower in Fiji may have inadvertently contributed to the champion's "dogged" determination!

This unforeseen association between hydropower energy and hotdog consumption challenges conventional wisdom in both the energy and culinary domains. The statistically significant correlation coefficient and the substantial r-squared value underscore the meaningful connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. It seems that when it comes to hotdogs, the saying "go with the flow" takes on a whole new dimension!

In conclusion, our study provides compelling evidence of a tangible link between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the consumption of hotdogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. This unanticipated alliance between hydroelectric power and competitive eating prompts further exploration into the depth and breadth of this curious relationship. One might say that this power-dog connection is not just a "frank" assessment but a full-bodied revelation in the world of energy and gastronomic research!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Hydopower energy generated in Fiji and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Hydropower Hours and Nathan's Devour: A Power-Dog Connection Dissection

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the number of hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has been a topic of speculative curiosity. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, this study examines the dynamic connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.7056202 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1983 to 2021, suggesting a peculiar association between the two variables. It seems that when it comes to hotdogs, the key may lie in the flow of hydroelectric power! Our research offers insight into this unexpected link, leaving some food for thought and perhaps a mustard of hypotheses. As the saying goes, "You can't have a hotdog without the doggone hydro power!"

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The interplay between energy production and consumption has long been a subject of extensive study, but rarely does it extend to the realm of competitive eating. Nonetheless, in our research, we have delved into the peculiar relationship between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the insatiable appetite of the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.
Now, hold onto your buns for this one! It's not every day that hydropower and hotdogs share the spotlight, but as we dive into the data, you'll see that there's more to this connection than meets the mustard.
The puns are as abundant as hotdogs at a summer cookout, and the stakes are as high as the cholesterol levels after a hotdog-eating contest! This research aims to shed light on the unexpected bond between hydroelectric power and the champion hotdog devourer.
As we unpack this peculiar pairing, we hope to tease out the sausages of truth from the buns of speculation. One might say we're on a roll with this investigation!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the number of hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The correlation coefficient of 0.7056202 indicated a moderately strong relationship between the two variables. This suggests that as the hydropower energy production in Fiji increased, so did the number of hotdogs devoured by the champion.
The r-squared value of 0.4978998 further supported the relationship, indicating that approximately 49.8% of the variability in hotdog consumption by the champion can be explained by the variability in hydropower energy generation in Fiji. We might say that there's more than just a mere "relish" at play here!
The p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is unlikely to be a result of random chance. In other words, the association between hydropower energy and hotdog consumption is statistically significant. It seems that when it comes to competitive eating, the hydroelectric power may have an unexpected sway. One could even say it's a "watt" of a surprise!
Fig. 1 captures the essence of this connection in a scatterplot, illustrating the clear, upward trend between the two variables. The plot leaves little room for doubt, and one might even say it's as convincing as a well-dressed hotdog!
Overall, the findings of this study provide compelling evidence of a tangible link between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the consumption of hotdogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. This unanticipated alliance between hydroelectric power and competitive eating offers food for thought, serving up a platter of unexpected connections and prompting further investigation into the power-dog dynamic. One might say it's a real "wiener" in the world of energy and gastronomic research!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has brought to light a surprising and statistically significant relationship between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the consumption of hotdogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. It seems that when it comes to competitive eating, the hydroelectric power may have an unexpectedly sausage-like sway. It's like the power of hydro is a secret ingredient in the champion's training regimen – a "hydrodog" if you will!

The findings of this study not only offer an intriguing connection but also raise important questions for future inquiry. As we wrap up this investigation, it's clear that the bond between hydroelectric power and hotdog consumption is no mere fluke. It's as real as a well-grilled bratwurst.

But let's not "ketchup" on this research any longer; it's time to "mustard" the courage to acknowledge that further studies in this area may risk skewing the seriousness of academic inquiry. It seems we've "relished" in this topic enough. No need to "sausage" the resources for additional investigations.

Therefore, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. Let's leave this power-dog dynamic to sizzle in the annals of curious correlations and move on to more conventionally related research topics. After all, there are plenty of other fish in the sea – or should we say, hotdogs in the bun – awaiting scholarly investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Hydropower Hours and Nathan's Devour: A Power-Dog Connection Dissection. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Canine Power Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Hydropower Hours and Nathan's Devour: A Power-Dog Connection Dissection. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Canine Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Hydropower Hours and Nathan's Devour: A Power-Dog Connection Dissection with an abstract of The relationship between hydropower energy generated in Fiji and the number of hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has been a topic of speculative curiosity. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, this study examines the dynamic connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. Our findings revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.7056202 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1983 to 2021, suggesting a peculiar association between the two variables. It seems that when it comes to hotdogs, the key may lie in the flow of hydroelectric power! Our research offers insight into this unexpected link, leaving some food for thought and perhaps a mustard of hypotheses. As the saying goes, "You can't have a hotdog without the doggone hydro power!

ChatGPT:

hydropower energy Fiji, hotdog consumption correlation, hydropower and hotdog consumption, energy administration data, hot dog eating competition champion, hydroelectric power correlation, hydropower consumption association, hotdog consumption trends, hydroelectric power and hotdog consumption correlation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Hydopower energy generated in Fiji
Detailed data title: Total hydopower energy generated in Fiji in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Hydopower energy generated in Fiji

Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Detailed data title: Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

Correlation r = 0.7056202 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4978998 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 49.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Hydopower energy generated in Fiji) over the 39 years from 1983 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.3E-7. 0.0000005252208927409710000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.71 in 5.3E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,903,961 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 38 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 38 because we have two variables measured over a period of 39 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.5, 0.84 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Hydopower energy generated in Fiji (Billion kWh)0.0490.2840.290.3290.3460.3270.3270.3810.3810.3860.3860.4060.4250.4260.430.4179220.449850.4140.4630.450.3440.3670.3390.3410.5080.4950.460.410.4510.520.5220.3970.4020.4910.4860.5610.5670.5670.567
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion (Hotdogs eaten)10.59.511.7515.513.51015.51621.519172019.522.2524.51920.25255050.544.553.334953.75665968546268696162707274717576




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.049,0.284,0.29,0.329,0.346,0.327,0.327,0.381,0.381,0.386,0.386,0.406,0.425,0.426,0.43,0.417922,0.44985,0.414,0.463,0.45,0.344,0.367,0.339,0.341,0.508,0.495,0.46,0.41,0.451,0.52,0.522,0.397,0.402,0.491,0.486,0.561,0.567,0.567,0.567,])
array_2 = np.array([10.5,9.5,11.75,15.5,13.5,10,15.5,16,21.5,19,17,20,19.5,22.25,24.5,19,20.25,25,50,50.5,44.5,53.33,49,53.75,66,59,68,54,62,68,69,61,62,70,72,74,71,75,76,])
array_1_name = "Hydopower energy generated in Fiji"
array_2_name = "Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 2840 · Black Variable ID: 23666 · Red Variable ID: 500
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0