about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,833 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the second variable is Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As fossil fuel use in Suriname increased, so did the heat in the atmosphere. This inadvertently led to a spike in the production of hotdogs, as the warmer temperatures created the perfect conditions for hotdog ingredients to flourish. Nathan's couldn't resist the opportunity to have more buns in the oven, and their champion gobbled up the extra sausages like there was no ketchup-tion. It was a case of global wursting at its finest!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie - In Suriname, a bustling gas station scene unfolds as cars and trucks line up under a hazy, sunlit sky. Fossil fuels are pumped into their tanks, creating a swirl of exhaust fumes. Nearby, at the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, the reigning champion is surrounded by a mountain of hot dogs. The scorching sun casts a warm glow as spectators cheer on, creating an atmosphere of excitement and competition. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Fossil fuel use in Suriname and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Whimsical illustration Brutalism Scalar art Cyberpunk An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Fossil fuel use in Suriname and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, in the following situation: Because the increase in fossil fuel use in Suriname led to higher global temperatures, which caused an increase in hot dog consumption at Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition as people tried to cope with the heat by eating more hot dogs. It's a classic case of climate change indirectly influencing competitive eating events.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Suriname, cars and trucks line up at a busy gas station, pumping fossil fuels into their tanks. The air is hazy with exhaust fumes. Meanwhile, at the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, the reigning champion is surrounded by a mountain of hot dogs, competing under the scorching sun as spectators cheer on.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: In Suriname, cars and trucks line up at a busy gas station, pumping fossil fuels into their tanks. The air is hazy with exhaust fumes. Meanwhile, at the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, the reigning champion is surrounded by a mountain of hot dogs, competing under the scorching sun as spectators cheer on. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie - In Suriname, a bustling gas station scene unfolds as cars and trucks line up under a hazy, sunlit sky. Fossil fuels are pumped into their tanks, creating a swirl of exhaust fumes. Nearby, at the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, the reigning champion is surrounded by a mountain of hot dogs. The scorching sun casts a warm glow as spectators cheer on, creating an atmosphere of excitement and competition.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Fossil fuel use in Suriname caused Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fueling the Fun: A Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Suriname and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption

Journal of Gastronomic Geopolitics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8304680 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Fun: A Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Suriname and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
Hot dogs and fossil fuels - a seemingly unlikely pair, but are they secretly connected? In this study, we employed data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to unearth the potential relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the number of hotdogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8304680, with p < 0.01, for the years 1980 to 2021.

Our analysis not only delves into the consumption patterns of fossil fuels in Suriname, but also investigates the eating habits of the celebrated champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The unexpected connection we stumbled upon left us with an important question: are the fossil fuels fueling the hot dogs, or are the hot dogs fueling the fossil fuels? These findings challenge conventional wisdom and prompt us to reconsider the fundamental relationship between energy use and competitive eating.

Just like how hot dogs are the wurst and the best all at once, our research presents a thought-provoking and light-hearted exploration of the unexpected interplay between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In conclusion, this study not only serves as a delightful diversion from traditional research topics, but also highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena in our society.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Fun: A Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Suriname and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
Hot dogs and fossil fuels - a seemingly unlikely pair, but are they secretly connected? In this study, we employed data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to unearth the potential relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the number of hotdogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8304680, with p < 0.01, for the years 1980 to 2021.

Our analysis not only delves into the consumption patterns of fossil fuels in Suriname, but also investigates the eating habits of the celebrated champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The unexpected connection we stumbled upon left us with an important question: are the fossil fuels fueling the hot dogs, or are the hot dogs fueling the fossil fuels? These findings challenge conventional wisdom and prompt us to reconsider the fundamental relationship between energy use and competitive eating.

Just like how hot dogs are the wurst and the best all at once, our research presents a thought-provoking and light-hearted exploration of the unexpected interplay between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In conclusion, this study not only serves as a delightful diversion from traditional research topics, but also highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena in our society.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the grand scheme of things, the connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition may seem about as logical as a vegetarian at a barbecue - surprising and perhaps a bit puzzling. However, as we embark on this curious investigation, we invite you to relish in the puns and jokes, as we sizzle through a trail of data to unravel the unexpected link between these two seemingly unrelated entities.

As we embark on this quirky journey, let us remember that in science, sometimes the most absurd connections hold the keys to significant discoveries. It's like the time when the economist decided to study outer space - he wanted to find out if there were any signs of "comet-ition" in the market. Although, thankfully, our research does not probe such far-reaching connections, the surprising link we uncovered in our investigation is enough to tickle the funny bone while prompting some serious contemplation.

To set the stage, imagine the unlikely duo of a sizzling hot dog, brimming with ketchup and mustard, and the unassuming fossil fuels quietly churning away in Suriname. The correlation between the two may seem as clear as a dietary study conducted at a bakery - you might expect to find a correlation between bread consumption and carb-loading! Yet, our findings will nudge you to reconsider the tangled web that is energy consumption and gastronomic feats. It's almost as if the hot dogs and the fossil fuels are in cahoots, conspiring to bewilder us with their unforeseen camaraderie.

So, sit back, grab a hot dog if you please, and prepare to partake in an academic exploration that is as intriguing as it is amusing. With every statistical nuance and every bite of hot dog, we invite you to join us in unraveling the enigmatic relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Let's dive into the data, savor the findings, and relish in the unexpected connection that leaves us pondering: are we witnessing a phenomenon of "fossil fueling the food," or is it a case of "food fueling the fossil fuels"?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Fun: A Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Suriname and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
Hot dogs and fossil fuels - a seemingly unlikely pair, but are they secretly connected? In this study, we employed data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to unearth the potential relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the number of hotdogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8304680, with p < 0.01, for the years 1980 to 2021.

Our analysis not only delves into the consumption patterns of fossil fuels in Suriname, but also investigates the eating habits of the celebrated champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The unexpected connection we stumbled upon left us with an important question: are the fossil fuels fueling the hot dogs, or are the hot dogs fueling the fossil fuels? These findings challenge conventional wisdom and prompt us to reconsider the fundamental relationship between energy use and competitive eating.

Just like how hot dogs are the wurst and the best all at once, our research presents a thought-provoking and light-hearted exploration of the unexpected interplay between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In conclusion, this study not only serves as a delightful diversion from traditional research topics, but also highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena in our society.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the grand scheme of things, the connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition may seem about as logical as a vegetarian at a barbecue - surprising and perhaps a bit puzzling. However, as we embark on this curious investigation, we invite you to relish in the puns and jokes, as we sizzle through a trail of data to unravel the unexpected link between these two seemingly unrelated entities.
As we embark on this quirky journey, let us remember that in science, sometimes the most absurd connections hold the keys to significant discoveries. It's like the time when the economist decided to study outer space - he wanted to find out if there were any signs of "comet-ition" in the market. Although, thankfully, our research does not probe such far-reaching connections, the surprising link we uncovered in our investigation is enough to tickle the funny bone while prompting some serious contemplation.
To set the stage, imagine the unlikely duo of a sizzling hot dog, brimming with ketchup and mustard, and the unassuming fossil fuels quietly churning away in Suriname. The correlation between the two may seem as clear as a dietary study conducted at a bakery - you might expect to find a correlation between bread consumption and carb-loading! Yet, our findings will nudge you to reconsider the tangled web that is energy consumption and gastronomic feats. It's almost as if the hot dogs and the fossil fuels are in cahoots, conspiring to bewilder us with their unforeseen camaraderie.
So, sit back, grab a hot dog if you please, and prepare to partake in an academic exploration that is as intriguing as it is amusing. With every statistical nuance and every bite of hot dog, we invite you to join us in unraveling the enigmatic relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Let's dive into the data, savor the findings, and relish in the unexpected connection that leaves us pondering: are we witnessing a phenomenon of "fossil fueling the food," or is it a case of "food fueling the fossil fuels"?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

A comprehensive review of existing literature uncovers a cluster of studies that explore the relationship between fuel consumption and dietary habits. Smith and Doe (2010) examine the impact of fossil fuel use on dietary patterns, noting a potential link between increased energy consumption and an uptick in consumption of processed foods. This intriguing finding raises the question: could the energy from fossil fuels be indirectly fueling the consumption of hot dogs by competitive eaters?

On the flip side, Jones and Brown (2015) investigate the effects of dietary choices on energy levels, suggesting that high-calorie foods such as hot dogs could potentially influence energy demand. This leads to the playful notion of whether hot dogs are actually fueling the fossil fuel consumption in Suriname – a tongue-in-cheek hypothesis that adds a dash of humor to the scholarly discourse.

In "The Hot Dog Diet: An Unholy Alliance Between Veggies and Sausages," Dr. L. Wiener (2017) explores the dietary impact of hot dog consumption and its potential link to energy usage. This work introduces a largely unprecedented idea, suggesting that the consumption of hot dogs may have broader implications on energy dynamics, including the fossil fuel use in Suriname.

Moving beyond strict academic literature, fictional works such as "The Great Hot Dog Conspiracy" by A. Sausage (2012) and "Fuel Wars: The Battle of the Buns" by K. Mustard (2018) present imaginative scenarios that, although purely speculative, reflect the curious intersection between fuel consumption and hot dog consumption, albeit in a light-hearted and whimsical manner.

In the realm of internet culture, the popular "Surprised Patrick" meme, depicting a starfish with a shocked expression, humorously captures the unexpected connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of copious hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. This meme, like our research, plays on the element of surprise, inviting viewers to ponder the underlying link between these seemingly disparate phenomena while providing a moment of lighthearted amusement.

As we delve into this unconventional connection, let us not forget the sage advice of the wise old hot dog vendor: "Relishing in the unexpected may just be the mustard of life – it adds flavor to the most unlikely pairings!" With this sentiment in mind, we approach our analysis with a dash of whimsy and a sprinkle of statistical rigor, preparing to uncover the surprising and potentially pun-derful relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Fun: A Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Suriname and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
Hot dogs and fossil fuels - a seemingly unlikely pair, but are they secretly connected? In this study, we employed data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to unearth the potential relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the number of hotdogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8304680, with p < 0.01, for the years 1980 to 2021.

Our analysis not only delves into the consumption patterns of fossil fuels in Suriname, but also investigates the eating habits of the celebrated champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The unexpected connection we stumbled upon left us with an important question: are the fossil fuels fueling the hot dogs, or are the hot dogs fueling the fossil fuels? These findings challenge conventional wisdom and prompt us to reconsider the fundamental relationship between energy use and competitive eating.

Just like how hot dogs are the wurst and the best all at once, our research presents a thought-provoking and light-hearted exploration of the unexpected interplay between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In conclusion, this study not only serves as a delightful diversion from traditional research topics, but also highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena in our society.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the grand scheme of things, the connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition may seem about as logical as a vegetarian at a barbecue - surprising and perhaps a bit puzzling. However, as we embark on this curious investigation, we invite you to relish in the puns and jokes, as we sizzle through a trail of data to unravel the unexpected link between these two seemingly unrelated entities.
As we embark on this quirky journey, let us remember that in science, sometimes the most absurd connections hold the keys to significant discoveries. It's like the time when the economist decided to study outer space - he wanted to find out if there were any signs of "comet-ition" in the market. Although, thankfully, our research does not probe such far-reaching connections, the surprising link we uncovered in our investigation is enough to tickle the funny bone while prompting some serious contemplation.
To set the stage, imagine the unlikely duo of a sizzling hot dog, brimming with ketchup and mustard, and the unassuming fossil fuels quietly churning away in Suriname. The correlation between the two may seem as clear as a dietary study conducted at a bakery - you might expect to find a correlation between bread consumption and carb-loading! Yet, our findings will nudge you to reconsider the tangled web that is energy consumption and gastronomic feats. It's almost as if the hot dogs and the fossil fuels are in cahoots, conspiring to bewilder us with their unforeseen camaraderie.
So, sit back, grab a hot dog if you please, and prepare to partake in an academic exploration that is as intriguing as it is amusing. With every statistical nuance and every bite of hot dog, we invite you to join us in unraveling the enigmatic relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Let's dive into the data, savor the findings, and relish in the unexpected connection that leaves us pondering: are we witnessing a phenomenon of "fossil fueling the food," or is it a case of "food fueling the fossil fuels"?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the curious connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, we employed a blend of statistical analysis and tongue-in-cheek humor. Our research team embarked on a quest that involved diving into a sea of data, armed with a sense of curiosity and a healthy dose of skepticism - after all, it's not every day that one sets out to investigate the link between fossil fuels and competitive eating.

Our first step in this offbeat journey involved gathering data from the Energy Information Administration, which provided a comprehensive overview of the fossil fuel consumption trends in Suriname. Much like the champion hot dog eater's quest for the ultimate wiener, we scoured through years of historical data spanning from 1980 to 2021, leaving no stone unturned in our pursuit of understanding the dynamics of energy use in this South American country.

After donning our figurative detective hats, we engaged in a flurry of internet sleuthing, scouring through sources such as Wikipedia to meticulously track the number of hot dogs devoured by the illustrious champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. We embraced the challenge with gusto, recognizing that this unconventional investigation required a dose of unconventional data collection.

In line with the spirit of this unconventional investigation, we melded the rigors of statistical analysis with the levity of lighthearted observations and puns to permeate the atmosphere with a sense of mirth throughout our research process. Our statistical analyses involved employing advanced regression models and correlation techniques, all while maintaining a light-hearted approach - after all, what good is research without a sprinkle of humor?

In a way, our research methods mirrored the paradoxical nature of the hot dogs and fossil fuels - a fusion of seriousness and playfulness, much like a good ol' grill session with friends. Each statistical model we applied was carefully crafted to scrutinize the relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the hot dog consumption by the champion, illuminating the unexpected nexus between these seemingly unrelated realms.

As we traversed through the data landscape, we indulged in the occasional dad joke to punctuate our findings - much like the unexpected bite of a pickle in a hot dog. For instance, as we probed the statistical intricacies, we couldn't help but muse that the champion's voracious appetite for hot dogs could very well be the "re-lentless" force behind the observed correlation, serving as a cheeky nod to the joyous consumption of both hot dogs and research findings.

In the end, our methodology blended the sophistication of statistical inquiry with the whimsical charm of unexpected connections, encapsulating the essence of our investigation into the enigmatic correlation between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Like a well-crafted pun, our research methodology sought to entertain and enlighten, all while navigating the uncharted waters of this unusual scientific inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8304680, r-squared of 0.6896771, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Fun: A Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Suriname and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
Hot dogs and fossil fuels - a seemingly unlikely pair, but are they secretly connected? In this study, we employed data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to unearth the potential relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the number of hotdogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8304680, with p < 0.01, for the years 1980 to 2021.

Our analysis not only delves into the consumption patterns of fossil fuels in Suriname, but also investigates the eating habits of the celebrated champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The unexpected connection we stumbled upon left us with an important question: are the fossil fuels fueling the hot dogs, or are the hot dogs fueling the fossil fuels? These findings challenge conventional wisdom and prompt us to reconsider the fundamental relationship between energy use and competitive eating.

Just like how hot dogs are the wurst and the best all at once, our research presents a thought-provoking and light-hearted exploration of the unexpected interplay between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In conclusion, this study not only serves as a delightful diversion from traditional research topics, but also highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena in our society.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the grand scheme of things, the connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition may seem about as logical as a vegetarian at a barbecue - surprising and perhaps a bit puzzling. However, as we embark on this curious investigation, we invite you to relish in the puns and jokes, as we sizzle through a trail of data to unravel the unexpected link between these two seemingly unrelated entities.
As we embark on this quirky journey, let us remember that in science, sometimes the most absurd connections hold the keys to significant discoveries. It's like the time when the economist decided to study outer space - he wanted to find out if there were any signs of "comet-ition" in the market. Although, thankfully, our research does not probe such far-reaching connections, the surprising link we uncovered in our investigation is enough to tickle the funny bone while prompting some serious contemplation.
To set the stage, imagine the unlikely duo of a sizzling hot dog, brimming with ketchup and mustard, and the unassuming fossil fuels quietly churning away in Suriname. The correlation between the two may seem as clear as a dietary study conducted at a bakery - you might expect to find a correlation between bread consumption and carb-loading! Yet, our findings will nudge you to reconsider the tangled web that is energy consumption and gastronomic feats. It's almost as if the hot dogs and the fossil fuels are in cahoots, conspiring to bewilder us with their unforeseen camaraderie.
So, sit back, grab a hot dog if you please, and prepare to partake in an academic exploration that is as intriguing as it is amusing. With every statistical nuance and every bite of hot dog, we invite you to join us in unraveling the enigmatic relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Let's dive into the data, savor the findings, and relish in the unexpected connection that leaves us pondering: are we witnessing a phenomenon of "fossil fueling the food," or is it a case of "food fueling the fossil fuels"?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition yielded intriguing results. We found a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8304680, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This suggests that as Fossil fuel use in Suriname increases, so does the number of hot dogs consumed by the champion. It's almost as if the champion is fueled by both competition and the unexpected, hearty sustenance of hot dogs!

The coefficient of determination (r-squared) value of 0.6896771 further elucidates the robustness of the relationship, indicating that approximately 69% of the variation in hot dog consumption can be explained by the variation in fossil fuel use in Suriname. It's as if the increasing consumption of hot dogs is directly powered by the escalating use of fossil fuels, paving the way for an unexpected and slightly humorous alliance between these seemingly distinct entities.

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the existence of a significant association between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the champion's hot dog consumption. This implies that the likelihood of obtaining such a strong relationship between the two variables due to random chance is remote, akin to finding a vegetarian at a hot dog eating competition!

Moreover, the figure (Fig. 1) depicts a scatterplot illustrating the positive correlation between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the number of hot dogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The data points form a clear upward trend, emphasizing the direct relationship between the variables. It's almost as if the hot dogs and fossil fuels are caught in a tango, twirling around in a surprising display of synchrony, leaving us to ponder the existential question: are the hot dogs fueling the champion's success or are the fossil fuels providing the energy for the consumption of more hot dogs? It's a conundrum wrapped in a mystery, smothered in mustard and relish.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Fun: A Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Suriname and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
Hot dogs and fossil fuels - a seemingly unlikely pair, but are they secretly connected? In this study, we employed data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to unearth the potential relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the number of hotdogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8304680, with p < 0.01, for the years 1980 to 2021.

Our analysis not only delves into the consumption patterns of fossil fuels in Suriname, but also investigates the eating habits of the celebrated champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The unexpected connection we stumbled upon left us with an important question: are the fossil fuels fueling the hot dogs, or are the hot dogs fueling the fossil fuels? These findings challenge conventional wisdom and prompt us to reconsider the fundamental relationship between energy use and competitive eating.

Just like how hot dogs are the wurst and the best all at once, our research presents a thought-provoking and light-hearted exploration of the unexpected interplay between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In conclusion, this study not only serves as a delightful diversion from traditional research topics, but also highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena in our society.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
A comprehensive review of existing literature uncovers a cluster of studies that explore the relationship between fuel consumption and dietary habits. Smith and Doe (2010) examine the impact of fossil fuel use on dietary patterns, noting a potential link between increased energy consumption and an uptick in consumption of processed foods. This intriguing finding raises the question: could the energy from fossil fuels be indirectly fueling the consumption of hot dogs by competitive eaters?
On the flip side, Jones and Brown (2015) investigate the effects of dietary choices on energy levels, suggesting that high-calorie foods such as hot dogs could potentially influence energy demand. This leads to the playful notion of whether hot dogs are actually fueling the fossil fuel consumption in Suriname – a tongue-in-cheek hypothesis that adds a dash of humor to the scholarly discourse.
In "The Hot Dog Diet: An Unholy Alliance Between Veggies and Sausages," Dr. L. Wiener (2017) explores the dietary impact of hot dog consumption and its potential link to energy usage. This work introduces a largely unprecedented idea, suggesting that the consumption of hot dogs may have broader implications on energy dynamics, including the fossil fuel use in Suriname.
Moving beyond strict academic literature, fictional works such as "The Great Hot Dog Conspiracy" by A. Sausage (2012) and "Fuel Wars: The Battle of the Buns" by K. Mustard (2018) present imaginative scenarios that, although purely speculative, reflect the curious intersection between fuel consumption and hot dog consumption, albeit in a light-hearted and whimsical manner.
In the realm of internet culture, the popular "Surprised Patrick" meme, depicting a starfish with a shocked expression, humorously captures the unexpected connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of copious hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. This meme, like our research, plays on the element of surprise, inviting viewers to ponder the underlying link between these seemingly disparate phenomena while providing a moment of lighthearted amusement.
As we delve into this unconventional connection, let us not forget the sage advice of the wise old hot dog vendor: "Relishing in the unexpected may just be the mustard of life – it adds flavor to the most unlikely pairings!" With this sentiment in mind, we approach our analysis with a dash of whimsy and a sprinkle of statistical rigor, preparing to uncover the surprising and potentially pun-derful relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition yielded intriguing results. We found a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8304680, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This suggests that as Fossil fuel use in Suriname increases, so does the number of hot dogs consumed by the champion. It's almost as if the champion is fueled by both competition and the unexpected, hearty sustenance of hot dogs!
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) value of 0.6896771 further elucidates the robustness of the relationship, indicating that approximately 69% of the variation in hot dog consumption can be explained by the variation in fossil fuel use in Suriname. It's as if the increasing consumption of hot dogs is directly powered by the escalating use of fossil fuels, paving the way for an unexpected and slightly humorous alliance between these seemingly distinct entities.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the existence of a significant association between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the champion's hot dog consumption. This implies that the likelihood of obtaining such a strong relationship between the two variables due to random chance is remote, akin to finding a vegetarian at a hot dog eating competition!
Moreover, the figure (Fig. 1) depicts a scatterplot illustrating the positive correlation between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the number of hot dogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The data points form a clear upward trend, emphasizing the direct relationship between the variables. It's almost as if the hot dogs and fossil fuels are caught in a tango, twirling around in a surprising display of synchrony, leaving us to ponder the existential question: are the hot dogs fueling the champion's success or are the fossil fuels providing the energy for the consumption of more hot dogs? It's a conundrum wrapped in a mystery, smothered in mustard and relish.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our results not only reinforce the existing body of literature that explores the intricate interplay between fuel consumption and dietary habits but also add a layer of complexity and humor to this unconventional connection. The substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8304680 underscores the robust relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, providing empirical support for the whimsical musings of previous researchers. It seems that the champion's voracious appetite for hot dogs is indeed entwined with the escalating use of fossil fuels in Suriname, creating a comically unexpected symbiotic relationship. It's as if the champion and fossil fuels are in a hot dog-eat-hot dog race, each fueling the other in a delightful dance of destiny - a classic case of "when there's a will, there's a bratwurst"!

Our findings echo the suggestions put forth by Smith and Doe (2010) regarding the potential indirect influence of energy consumption on dietary patterns. The data seems to indicate that as the energy consumption from fossil fuels increases, so does the consumption of hot dogs by the champion, lending credence to the humorous hypothesis that the champion's insatiable appetite is fueled by more than just competition alone. It's as if the fossil fuels are lighting a fire under the hot dogs, spurring them to race towards the champion's waiting taste buds – a captivating culinary conundrum indeed!

Furthermore, the correlation we uncovered also aligns with the notion proposed by Jones and Brown (2015) that high-calorie foods such as hot dogs may play a role in influencing energy demand. Our results seem to support the playful idea that the champion's hot dog consumption is not only a product of sheer determination and appetite but may also be shaped by the broader dynamics of energy utilization, akin to a hot dog aficionado with a side of statistical significance!

Even the fictional works of A. Sausage (2012) and K. Mustard (2018), although whimsical in nature, seem to unintentionally foreshadow the unexpected link we've discovered. Our research adds empirical weight to these imaginative scenarios, suggesting that reality may indeed be stranger than fiction when it comes to the curious interweaving of hot dog consumption and fuel use. It's a statistical symphony of sausages and fuel, each influencing the other in an almost poetic display of gastronomic and energy harmony!

In conclusion, our study has peeled back the layers of this seemingly lighthearted connection, revealing a surprising depth and statistical significance. The inextricable link between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition not only challenges traditional scientific paradigms but also provides a touch of levity and curiosity to the often sober world of empirical research. It's a reminder that, amidst the sea of data and statistics, there are unexpected correlations and correlations that - much like a well-crafted dad joke - add a touch of humor and wonder to our scholarly pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fueling the Fun: A Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Suriname and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption

[[ABSTRACT]]
Hot dogs and fossil fuels - a seemingly unlikely pair, but are they secretly connected? In this study, we employed data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to unearth the potential relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the number of hotdogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8304680, with p < 0.01, for the years 1980 to 2021.

Our analysis not only delves into the consumption patterns of fossil fuels in Suriname, but also investigates the eating habits of the celebrated champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The unexpected connection we stumbled upon left us with an important question: are the fossil fuels fueling the hot dogs, or are the hot dogs fueling the fossil fuels? These findings challenge conventional wisdom and prompt us to reconsider the fundamental relationship between energy use and competitive eating.

Just like how hot dogs are the wurst and the best all at once, our research presents a thought-provoking and light-hearted exploration of the unexpected interplay between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In conclusion, this study not only serves as a delightful diversion from traditional research topics, but also highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena in our society.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the grand scheme of things, the connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition may seem about as logical as a vegetarian at a barbecue - surprising and perhaps a bit puzzling. However, as we embark on this curious investigation, we invite you to relish in the puns and jokes, as we sizzle through a trail of data to unravel the unexpected link between these two seemingly unrelated entities.
As we embark on this quirky journey, let us remember that in science, sometimes the most absurd connections hold the keys to significant discoveries. It's like the time when the economist decided to study outer space - he wanted to find out if there were any signs of "comet-ition" in the market. Although, thankfully, our research does not probe such far-reaching connections, the surprising link we uncovered in our investigation is enough to tickle the funny bone while prompting some serious contemplation.
To set the stage, imagine the unlikely duo of a sizzling hot dog, brimming with ketchup and mustard, and the unassuming fossil fuels quietly churning away in Suriname. The correlation between the two may seem as clear as a dietary study conducted at a bakery - you might expect to find a correlation between bread consumption and carb-loading! Yet, our findings will nudge you to reconsider the tangled web that is energy consumption and gastronomic feats. It's almost as if the hot dogs and the fossil fuels are in cahoots, conspiring to bewilder us with their unforeseen camaraderie.
So, sit back, grab a hot dog if you please, and prepare to partake in an academic exploration that is as intriguing as it is amusing. With every statistical nuance and every bite of hot dog, we invite you to join us in unraveling the enigmatic relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Let's dive into the data, savor the findings, and relish in the unexpected connection that leaves us pondering: are we witnessing a phenomenon of "fossil fueling the food," or is it a case of "food fueling the fossil fuels"?

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition yielded intriguing results. We found a substantial correlation coefficient of 0.8304680, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This suggests that as Fossil fuel use in Suriname increases, so does the number of hot dogs consumed by the champion. It's almost as if the champion is fueled by both competition and the unexpected, hearty sustenance of hot dogs!
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) value of 0.6896771 further elucidates the robustness of the relationship, indicating that approximately 69% of the variation in hot dog consumption can be explained by the variation in fossil fuel use in Suriname. It's as if the increasing consumption of hot dogs is directly powered by the escalating use of fossil fuels, paving the way for an unexpected and slightly humorous alliance between these seemingly distinct entities.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the existence of a significant association between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the champion's hot dog consumption. This implies that the likelihood of obtaining such a strong relationship between the two variables due to random chance is remote, akin to finding a vegetarian at a hot dog eating competition!
Moreover, the figure (Fig. 1) depicts a scatterplot illustrating the positive correlation between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the number of hot dogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The data points form a clear upward trend, emphasizing the direct relationship between the variables. It's almost as if the hot dogs and fossil fuels are caught in a tango, twirling around in a surprising display of synchrony, leaving us to ponder the existential question: are the hot dogs fueling the champion's success or are the fossil fuels providing the energy for the consumption of more hot dogs? It's a conundrum wrapped in a mystery, smothered in mustard and relish.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has brought to light an unexpected and fascinating relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. It appears that as Fossil fuel use in Suriname increases, so does the number of hot dogs devoured by the champion, leading to a positively correlated and statistically significant association. It's as if the champion is powered by both the underdog spirit of competition and the underrated delight of hot dogs – a true case of "fuelling success on all fronts!"

This study not only provides a whimsical exploration of two seemingly unrelated domains but also challenges conventional wisdom in the most delightful way possible. We invite the academic community to relish in these findings and ponder the question: are hot dogs the secret to sustainable energy consumption? After all, they do seem to fuel more than just Fourth of July celebrations and backyard barbecues.

As avid researchers, we are humbled to have stumbled upon this unexpected alliance, and we hope it inspires future investigations in equally playful and thought-provoking territory. At the same time, we firmly assert that no further research is needed in this area - it's time to ketchup on other pressing scientific inquiries!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fueling the Fun: A Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Suriname and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Gastronomic Geopolitics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fueling the Fun: A Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Suriname and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Wacky Scientific Inquiries and Revelations (SWIR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fueling the Fun: A Link Between Fossil Fuel Use in Suriname and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's Consumption with an abstract of Hot dogs and fossil fuels - a seemingly unlikely pair, but are they secretly connected? In this study, we employed data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to unearth the potential relationship between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the number of hotdogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Our findings revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8304680, with p < 0.01, for the years 1980 to 2021.
Our analysis not only delves into the consumption patterns of fossil fuels in Suriname, but also investigates the eating habits of the celebrated champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The unexpected connection we stumbled upon left us with an important question: are the fossil fuels fueling the hot dogs, or are the hot dogs fueling the fossil fuels? These findings challenge conventional wisdom and prompt us to reconsider the fundamental relationship between energy use and competitive eating.
Just like how hot dogs are the wurst and the best all at once, our research presents a thought-provoking and light-hearted exploration of the unexpected interplay between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In conclusion, this study not only serves as a delightful diversion from traditional research topics, but also highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena in our society.

ChatGPT:

"Fossil fuel consumption Suriname," "Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champion," "Hot dog consumption correlation," "Energy Information Administration data," "Suriname fossil fuel use," "Competitive eating habits," "Hot dog consumption patterns," "Fossil fuel use correlation," "Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition history," "Relationship between energy use and competitive eating"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Fossil fuel use in Suriname
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Suriname in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Suriname

Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Detailed data title: Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

Correlation r = 0.8304680 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6896771 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 69% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Suriname) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.02E-11. 0.0000000000102472990102217160
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 1.02E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 97,586,690,796 random variables You don't actually need 97 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.7, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Fossil fuel use in Suriname (Billion kWh)0.6410.4990.2530.3630.2620.210.4110.3480.4020.2560.330.2890.2890.30.3070.3150.1250.1250.1270.1290.6870.6910.690.6920.6930.6970.7010.7010.7010.7030.483160.85541.070661.087581.365821.459821.117660.942820.882660.987940.9380130.998046
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion (Hotdogs eaten)9.5111110.59.511.7515.513.51015.51621.519172019.522.2524.51920.25255050.544.553.334953.75665968546268696162707274717576




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.641,0.499,0.253,0.363,0.262,0.21,0.411,0.348,0.402,0.256,0.33,0.289,0.289,0.3,0.307,0.315,0.125,0.125,0.127,0.129,0.687,0.691,0.69,0.692,0.693,0.697,0.701,0.701,0.701,0.703,0.48316,0.8554,1.07066,1.08758,1.36582,1.45982,1.11766,0.94282,0.88266,0.98794,0.938013,0.998046,])
array_2 = np.array([9.5,11,11,10.5,9.5,11.75,15.5,13.5,10,15.5,16,21.5,19,17,20,19.5,22.25,24.5,19,20.25,25,50,50.5,44.5,53.33,49,53.75,66,59,68,54,62,68,69,61,62,70,72,74,71,75,76,])
array_1_name = "Fossil fuel use in Suriname"
array_2_name = "Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2833 · Black Variable ID: 24004 · Red Variable ID: 500
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0