about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,732 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The distance between Venus and Mercury and the second variable is The number of nursing assistants in Indiana.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the distance between Venus and Mercury shrinks, their gravitational pull forms a cosmic vacuum cleaner effect. This inadvertently sucks up the motivation for nursing assistant jobs in Indiana, leading to a decrease in their numbers. It's a case of celestial bodies creating celestial job changes!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Concept art ] Create a serene and heartwarming scene of a group of diligent nursing assistants in Indiana providing compassionate care under the glow of Venus and Mercury in the clear evening sky. The focus should be on the juxtaposition of the celestial bodies shining brightly above and the devoted healthcare professionals at work below. The lighting should emphasize the warm, comforting atmosphere of the scene, with subtle details that evoke a sense of tranquility and dedication. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The distance between Venus and Mercury and The number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Steampunk Cybernetic art Oragami Woodblock painting Concept art
ChatGPT: Concept art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The distance between Venus and Mercury and The number of nursing assistants in Indiana together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the clear evening sky over Indiana, Venus and Mercury appear close together, glowing brightly as they illuminate the horizon. Below, a group of diligent nursing assistants in Indiana work together, providing care with compassion and expertise.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: In the clear evening sky over Indiana, Venus and Mercury appear close together, glowing brightly as they illuminate the horizon. Below, a group of diligent nursing assistants in Indiana work together, providing care with compassion and expertise. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Concept art ] Create a serene and heartwarming scene of a group of diligent nursing assistants in Indiana providing compassionate care under the glow of Venus and Mercury in the clear evening sky. The focus should be on the juxtaposition of the celestial bodies shining brightly above and the devoted healthcare professionals at work below. The lighting should emphasize the warm, comforting atmosphere of the scene, with subtle details that evoke a sense of tranquility and dedication.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The distance between Venus and Mercury caused The number of nursing assistants in Indiana to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Vexing Venus and Mercurial Metrics: Exploring the Eccentric Relationship Between Planetary Proximity and Nursing Personnel in Indiana

The Interstellar Journal of Interdisciplinary Nursing Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Venus and Mercury and The number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Caclculated using Astropy and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7142437 and p < 0.05 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Vexing Venus and Mercurial Metrics: Exploring the Eccentric Relationship Between Planetary Proximity and Nursing Personnel in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unconventional examination of the possible relationship between the distance separating Venus and Mercury with the number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Leveraging data from Astropy's meticulous calculations and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a cosmic quest to shed light on this enigmatic correlation. Despite the celestial nature of our inquiry, we unearthed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7142437 (p < 0.05) for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our findings suggest that while the paths of planets may seem unrelated to earthly matters, there may be an unforeseen association between cosmic choreography and the healthcare workforce. This research will boldly go where no statistical analysis has gone before, adding a touch of whimsy to the often serious world of data analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Venus and Mercury and The number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Vexing Venus and Mercurial Metrics: Exploring the Eccentric Relationship Between Planetary Proximity and Nursing Personnel in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unconventional examination of the possible relationship between the distance separating Venus and Mercury with the number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Leveraging data from Astropy's meticulous calculations and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a cosmic quest to shed light on this enigmatic correlation. Despite the celestial nature of our inquiry, we unearthed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7142437 (p < 0.05) for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our findings suggest that while the paths of planets may seem unrelated to earthly matters, there may be an unforeseen association between cosmic choreography and the healthcare workforce. This research will boldly go where no statistical analysis has gone before, adding a touch of whimsy to the often serious world of data analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

With the increasing importance of interdisciplinary research, our study ventures beyond the boundaries of traditional science to explore the extraterrestrial influences on earthly matters. In this paper, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the distance separating the planets Venus and Mercury and the number of nursing assistants in the state of Indiana. We address this celestial conundrum by wielding statistical tools with the precision of a cosmic alignment.

One might ponder, "What cosmic forces could possibly impact the earthly workforce of nursing assistants in the Hoosier state?" Well, just as the planetary orbits seem unassuming at first glance, our research takes a whimsical yet rigorous stance to uncover potential correlations that may have eluded the naked eye.

The cosmic dance of Venus and Mercury around the sun, while usually receiving attention from astronomers and astrologers alike, has seldom been explored in the context of healthcare staffing. As we embark on this intellectually daring journey, we aim to infuse a touch of levity and curiosity into the often dour world of statistical analysis. After all, who said science can't have a sense of humor, or that data analysis can't be a bit of a galactic guessing game?

This study not only contributes to the burgeoning field of astro-health econometrics (a term we're coining right now), but also offers a novel perspective on the intertwined nature of the cosmos and the healthcare industry. Our findings will not only shed light on this quirky association between planetary positions and workforce demographics but will also bring a smile to the faces of data enthusiasts and stargazers alike - a celestial crossover if you will.

In the sections that follow, we will unravel the methods, results, and implications of our study, boldly going where no statistical analysis has gone before. So fasten your seatbelts, for we are about to embark on a statistically significant, scientifically speculative, and splendidly silly odyssey through space and workforce statistics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Venus and Mercury and The number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Vexing Venus and Mercurial Metrics: Exploring the Eccentric Relationship Between Planetary Proximity and Nursing Personnel in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unconventional examination of the possible relationship between the distance separating Venus and Mercury with the number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Leveraging data from Astropy's meticulous calculations and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a cosmic quest to shed light on this enigmatic correlation. Despite the celestial nature of our inquiry, we unearthed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7142437 (p < 0.05) for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our findings suggest that while the paths of planets may seem unrelated to earthly matters, there may be an unforeseen association between cosmic choreography and the healthcare workforce. This research will boldly go where no statistical analysis has gone before, adding a touch of whimsy to the often serious world of data analysis.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
With the increasing importance of interdisciplinary research, our study ventures beyond the boundaries of traditional science to explore the extraterrestrial influences on earthly matters. In this paper, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the distance separating the planets Venus and Mercury and the number of nursing assistants in the state of Indiana. We address this celestial conundrum by wielding statistical tools with the precision of a cosmic alignment.
One might ponder, "What cosmic forces could possibly impact the earthly workforce of nursing assistants in the Hoosier state?" Well, just as the planetary orbits seem unassuming at first glance, our research takes a whimsical yet rigorous stance to uncover potential correlations that may have eluded the naked eye.
The cosmic dance of Venus and Mercury around the sun, while usually receiving attention from astronomers and astrologers alike, has seldom been explored in the context of healthcare staffing. As we embark on this intellectually daring journey, we aim to infuse a touch of levity and curiosity into the often dour world of statistical analysis. After all, who said science can't have a sense of humor, or that data analysis can't be a bit of a galactic guessing game?
This study not only contributes to the burgeoning field of astro-health econometrics (a term we're coining right now), but also offers a novel perspective on the intertwined nature of the cosmos and the healthcare industry. Our findings will not only shed light on this quirky association between planetary positions and workforce demographics but will also bring a smile to the faces of data enthusiasts and stargazers alike - a celestial crossover if you will.
In the sections that follow, we will unravel the methods, results, and implications of our study, boldly going where no statistical analysis has gone before. So fasten your seatbelts, for we are about to embark on a statistically significant, scientifically speculative, and splendidly silly odyssey through space and workforce statistics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between celestial bodies and earthly phenomena, while typically relegated to the realm of science fiction, has recently piqued the interest of scholars across various disciplines. Among the most unconventional of these inquiries is the investigation into the potential link between the proximity of Venus and Mercury and the number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Despite its seemingly outlandish premise, this line of research has garnered attention from both the astronomical and healthcare sectors.

In "Planetary Dynamics and Healthcare Workforce: A Celestial Perspective," Smith and Doe delve into the cosmic symphony of our solar system and its conceivable resonance with the labor force in healthcare. Their exploration of the orbital dynamics of Venus and Mercury alongside the flux in nursing personnel presents a thought-provoking hypothesis. While their study lacks empirical evidence, it serves as a catalyst for our present inquiry, igniting a curiosity that propels us into uncharted territory.

Furthermore, Jones et al.'s examination in "Celestial Staffing: A Galactic Inquiry into Healthcare" introduces the idea that celestial bodies might exert an inexplicable influence on the terrestrial workforce. Their approach, while speculative, offers a framework for our own study, prompting us to explore the uncharted cosmos of nursing assistants and planetary positions.

Moving beyond the scholarly realm, "The Cosmic Workplace: Planetary Phenomena and Nursing Dynamics" by Robinson et al. taps into the intersection of astrology and labor patterns, hinting at a possible connection between cosmic phenomena and staffing trends. While their work is more metaphysical in nature, it adds an intriguing layer to the discourse surrounding our cosmic investigation.

Shifting gears to a more whimsical dimension, non-fiction works such as Neil deGrasse Tyson's "Astrophysics for People in a Hurry" and Stephen Hawking's "Brief Answers to the Big Questions" offer cosmic insights, albeit without a direct focus on our specific inquiry. Nonetheless, their exploration of the universe serves as a cosmic backdrop for our own celestial escapade.

In the realm of fiction, the cosmic antics in Douglas Adams' "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" playfully blend scientific conjecture with humor, reflecting the spirit of curiosity and absurdity that underpins our study. While not a direct exposition of our research area, its interstellar tomfoolery provides a lighthearted counterpart to our numerical rigidity.

Notably, internet memes such as the "Venus and Mercury Alignment Nurse" and "Indiana Nursing Assistants Planetary Shift" have emerged as peculiar digital artifacts, hinting at a niche fascination with the convergence of cosmic events and healthcare staffing. While these memes lack scholarly rigor, they nonetheless capture the zeitgeist of our interdisciplinary quest and exemplify the capricious nature of our investigation.

While the unorthodox nature of our inquiry may raise eyebrows in traditional academic circles, it exemplifies the innovative and playful spirit that characterizes our foray into the cosmic conundrum of planetary proximity and nursing personnel in Indiana.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Venus and Mercury and The number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Caclculated using Astropy and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Vexing Venus and Mercurial Metrics: Exploring the Eccentric Relationship Between Planetary Proximity and Nursing Personnel in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unconventional examination of the possible relationship between the distance separating Venus and Mercury with the number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Leveraging data from Astropy's meticulous calculations and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a cosmic quest to shed light on this enigmatic correlation. Despite the celestial nature of our inquiry, we unearthed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7142437 (p < 0.05) for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our findings suggest that while the paths of planets may seem unrelated to earthly matters, there may be an unforeseen association between cosmic choreography and the healthcare workforce. This research will boldly go where no statistical analysis has gone before, adding a touch of whimsy to the often serious world of data analysis.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
With the increasing importance of interdisciplinary research, our study ventures beyond the boundaries of traditional science to explore the extraterrestrial influences on earthly matters. In this paper, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the distance separating the planets Venus and Mercury and the number of nursing assistants in the state of Indiana. We address this celestial conundrum by wielding statistical tools with the precision of a cosmic alignment.
One might ponder, "What cosmic forces could possibly impact the earthly workforce of nursing assistants in the Hoosier state?" Well, just as the planetary orbits seem unassuming at first glance, our research takes a whimsical yet rigorous stance to uncover potential correlations that may have eluded the naked eye.
The cosmic dance of Venus and Mercury around the sun, while usually receiving attention from astronomers and astrologers alike, has seldom been explored in the context of healthcare staffing. As we embark on this intellectually daring journey, we aim to infuse a touch of levity and curiosity into the often dour world of statistical analysis. After all, who said science can't have a sense of humor, or that data analysis can't be a bit of a galactic guessing game?
This study not only contributes to the burgeoning field of astro-health econometrics (a term we're coining right now), but also offers a novel perspective on the intertwined nature of the cosmos and the healthcare industry. Our findings will not only shed light on this quirky association between planetary positions and workforce demographics but will also bring a smile to the faces of data enthusiasts and stargazers alike - a celestial crossover if you will.
In the sections that follow, we will unravel the methods, results, and implications of our study, boldly going where no statistical analysis has gone before. So fasten your seatbelts, for we are about to embark on a statistically significant, scientifically speculative, and splendidly silly odyssey through space and workforce statistics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To explore the cosmic conundrum of the potential relationship between the distance between Venus and Mercury and the number of nursing assistants in Indiana, our research team utilized an assortment of data sources and statistical techniques that are truly out of this world. Our approach sought to bring a touch of whimsy and creativity to the often buttoned-up world of research methodologies, while maintaining the necessary rigor and precision to tackle our celestial subject matter.

Data Collection:
Our team scoured the depths of the internet, navigating through the cosmic debris of information, and predominantly relied on data from Astropy’s meticulously calculated planetary positions and the Bureau of Labor Statistics' records of nursing personnel in Indiana. Spanning the years 2012 to 2022, this dataset provided an expansive temporal canvas upon which to paint our statistical analysis.

Statistical Analysis:
With the precision of a telescope zeroing in on a distant quasar, we applied a combination of robust statistical methods to discern any potential relationship between the orbits of Venus and Mercury and the number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Leveraging correlation analysis, regression modeling, and a touch of astrological intuition (just kidding!), we sought to uncover unique insights that might be hiding within the cosmic dance of our neighboring planets.

Cosmically Convoluted Calculations:
In an effort to add a touch of cosmic intrigue to our statistical wizardry, we incorporated a set of elaborate calculations that involved adjusting for the elliptical nature of planetary orbits and the gravitational influences of neighboring celestial bodies. While these calculations may sound like something out of a sci-fi novel, we assure you that they were applied with the utmost scientific seriousness, and perhaps a hint of cosmic curiosity.

Limitations and Caveats:
As with any exploratory foray into the cosmic unknown, our study is not without its limitations. While we strived to control for all relevant demographic and celestial variables, there may still exist unmeasured cosmic phenomena that could confound our findings. Additionally, the generalizability of our results to other geographical regions and celestial bodies remains an open question for future research, though we do hope to inspire more cosmic inquiries in the realm of healthcare and beyond.

In summary, our methodology aimed to blend the precision of statistical analysis with the starry-eyed wonder of cosmic exploration, adding a dash of humor and curiosity to the often serious world of research. Stay tuned for the celestial spectacle that awaits in the results section, where we unveil the cosmic correlations uncovered in the depths of our data analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Venus and Mercury and The number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Caclculated using Astropy and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7142437, r-squared of 0.5101441, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Vexing Venus and Mercurial Metrics: Exploring the Eccentric Relationship Between Planetary Proximity and Nursing Personnel in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unconventional examination of the possible relationship between the distance separating Venus and Mercury with the number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Leveraging data from Astropy's meticulous calculations and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a cosmic quest to shed light on this enigmatic correlation. Despite the celestial nature of our inquiry, we unearthed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7142437 (p < 0.05) for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our findings suggest that while the paths of planets may seem unrelated to earthly matters, there may be an unforeseen association between cosmic choreography and the healthcare workforce. This research will boldly go where no statistical analysis has gone before, adding a touch of whimsy to the often serious world of data analysis.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
With the increasing importance of interdisciplinary research, our study ventures beyond the boundaries of traditional science to explore the extraterrestrial influences on earthly matters. In this paper, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the distance separating the planets Venus and Mercury and the number of nursing assistants in the state of Indiana. We address this celestial conundrum by wielding statistical tools with the precision of a cosmic alignment.
One might ponder, "What cosmic forces could possibly impact the earthly workforce of nursing assistants in the Hoosier state?" Well, just as the planetary orbits seem unassuming at first glance, our research takes a whimsical yet rigorous stance to uncover potential correlations that may have eluded the naked eye.
The cosmic dance of Venus and Mercury around the sun, while usually receiving attention from astronomers and astrologers alike, has seldom been explored in the context of healthcare staffing. As we embark on this intellectually daring journey, we aim to infuse a touch of levity and curiosity into the often dour world of statistical analysis. After all, who said science can't have a sense of humor, or that data analysis can't be a bit of a galactic guessing game?
This study not only contributes to the burgeoning field of astro-health econometrics (a term we're coining right now), but also offers a novel perspective on the intertwined nature of the cosmos and the healthcare industry. Our findings will not only shed light on this quirky association between planetary positions and workforce demographics but will also bring a smile to the faces of data enthusiasts and stargazers alike - a celestial crossover if you will.
In the sections that follow, we will unravel the methods, results, and implications of our study, boldly going where no statistical analysis has gone before. So fasten your seatbelts, for we are about to embark on a statistically significant, scientifically speculative, and splendidly silly odyssey through space and workforce statistics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the peculiar linkage between the distance separating Venus and Mercury and the number of nursing assistants in Indiana has unveiled some unexpectedly intriguing results. Evidently, the cosmic dance between these neighboring planets managed to twirl its way into the terrestrial workforce, much to the amazement of our research team.

Upon crunching the numbers, we uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7142437, with an r-squared of 0.5101441, for the period of 2012 to 2022. In other words, the proximity of Venus and Mercury appears to have a noticeable influence on the number of nursing assistants bustling about in the Hoosier state. Who would have thought that the gravitational tugs and celestial ballet of these planets might have an impact on healthcare staffing?

In our scatterplot (Fig.1), the tight cluster of data points further illustrates the strong relationship between this cosmic odd couple and the earthly caregivers. The scatterplot practically screams, "Look at me, I'm statistically significant and cosmically cool!"

While some may have initially dismissed this investigation as a flight of fancy, our findings bring a touch of cosmic whimsy to the otherwise mundane realm of workforce statistics. It's a reminder that beneath the stiff veneer of data analysis, there's a universe of quirky correlations just waiting to be discovered.

We, of course, acknowledge the limitations of our study and the perplexing nature of these findings. But hey, science and statistics are nothing if not full of surprises. And if we can bring a bit of intergalactic charm to the world of research, then we consider it a celestial win-win!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Venus and Mercury and The number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Vexing Venus and Mercurial Metrics: Exploring the Eccentric Relationship Between Planetary Proximity and Nursing Personnel in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unconventional examination of the possible relationship between the distance separating Venus and Mercury with the number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Leveraging data from Astropy's meticulous calculations and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a cosmic quest to shed light on this enigmatic correlation. Despite the celestial nature of our inquiry, we unearthed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7142437 (p < 0.05) for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our findings suggest that while the paths of planets may seem unrelated to earthly matters, there may be an unforeseen association between cosmic choreography and the healthcare workforce. This research will boldly go where no statistical analysis has gone before, adding a touch of whimsy to the often serious world of data analysis.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between celestial bodies and earthly phenomena, while typically relegated to the realm of science fiction, has recently piqued the interest of scholars across various disciplines. Among the most unconventional of these inquiries is the investigation into the potential link between the proximity of Venus and Mercury and the number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Despite its seemingly outlandish premise, this line of research has garnered attention from both the astronomical and healthcare sectors.
In "Planetary Dynamics and Healthcare Workforce: A Celestial Perspective," Smith and Doe delve into the cosmic symphony of our solar system and its conceivable resonance with the labor force in healthcare. Their exploration of the orbital dynamics of Venus and Mercury alongside the flux in nursing personnel presents a thought-provoking hypothesis. While their study lacks empirical evidence, it serves as a catalyst for our present inquiry, igniting a curiosity that propels us into uncharted territory.
Furthermore, Jones et al.'s examination in "Celestial Staffing: A Galactic Inquiry into Healthcare" introduces the idea that celestial bodies might exert an inexplicable influence on the terrestrial workforce. Their approach, while speculative, offers a framework for our own study, prompting us to explore the uncharted cosmos of nursing assistants and planetary positions.
Moving beyond the scholarly realm, "The Cosmic Workplace: Planetary Phenomena and Nursing Dynamics" by Robinson et al. taps into the intersection of astrology and labor patterns, hinting at a possible connection between cosmic phenomena and staffing trends. While their work is more metaphysical in nature, it adds an intriguing layer to the discourse surrounding our cosmic investigation.
Shifting gears to a more whimsical dimension, non-fiction works such as Neil deGrasse Tyson's "Astrophysics for People in a Hurry" and Stephen Hawking's "Brief Answers to the Big Questions" offer cosmic insights, albeit without a direct focus on our specific inquiry. Nonetheless, their exploration of the universe serves as a cosmic backdrop for our own celestial escapade.
In the realm of fiction, the cosmic antics in Douglas Adams' "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" playfully blend scientific conjecture with humor, reflecting the spirit of curiosity and absurdity that underpins our study. While not a direct exposition of our research area, its interstellar tomfoolery provides a lighthearted counterpart to our numerical rigidity.
Notably, internet memes such as the "Venus and Mercury Alignment Nurse" and "Indiana Nursing Assistants Planetary Shift" have emerged as peculiar digital artifacts, hinting at a niche fascination with the convergence of cosmic events and healthcare staffing. While these memes lack scholarly rigor, they nonetheless capture the zeitgeist of our interdisciplinary quest and exemplify the capricious nature of our investigation.
While the unorthodox nature of our inquiry may raise eyebrows in traditional academic circles, it exemplifies the innovative and playful spirit that characterizes our foray into the cosmic conundrum of planetary proximity and nursing personnel in Indiana.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the peculiar linkage between the distance separating Venus and Mercury and the number of nursing assistants in Indiana has unveiled some unexpectedly intriguing results. Evidently, the cosmic dance between these neighboring planets managed to twirl its way into the terrestrial workforce, much to the amazement of our research team.
Upon crunching the numbers, we uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7142437, with an r-squared of 0.5101441, for the period of 2012 to 2022. In other words, the proximity of Venus and Mercury appears to have a noticeable influence on the number of nursing assistants bustling about in the Hoosier state. Who would have thought that the gravitational tugs and celestial ballet of these planets might have an impact on healthcare staffing?
In our scatterplot (Fig.1), the tight cluster of data points further illustrates the strong relationship between this cosmic odd couple and the earthly caregivers. The scatterplot practically screams, "Look at me, I'm statistically significant and cosmically cool!"
While some may have initially dismissed this investigation as a flight of fancy, our findings bring a touch of cosmic whimsy to the otherwise mundane realm of workforce statistics. It's a reminder that beneath the stiff veneer of data analysis, there's a universe of quirky correlations just waiting to be discovered.
We, of course, acknowledge the limitations of our study and the perplexing nature of these findings. But hey, science and statistics are nothing if not full of surprises. And if we can bring a bit of intergalactic charm to the world of research, then we consider it a celestial win-win!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study not only add a celestial perspective to the field of workforce statistics, but they also serve as a cosmic reminder of the unexpected connections that can emerge from the most unlikely pairings. Through our exploration of the relationship between the distance separating Venus and Mercury and the number of nursing assistants in Indiana, we've not only sparked a newfound appreciation for the quirks of statistical analysis but also glimpsed the potential influence of cosmic choreography on earthly endeavors.

Supporting the prior research, our findings align with the speculative notions put forth by Smith and Doe, who first proposed the idea of a connection between planetary dynamics and healthcare workforce. It seems that the celestial symphony conducted by Venus and Mercury does indeed resonate with the staffing trends in the healthcare sector of a specific geographic region, challenging the traditional boundaries of empirical evidence and expanding our understanding of the broader impact of planetary dynamics.

Our results mirror the unorthodox musings of Jones et al., as we too discovered a statistically significant correlation between these celestial bodies and the earthly workforce. Their speculative framework provided the impetus for our own inquiry, serving as a catalyst for our journey into the cosmic unknown. Who would have thought that the celestial dance of Venus and Mercury could hold sway over the bustling cohort of nursing assistants in Indiana?

Even Robinson et al.'s more metaphysical approach, which hinted at a possible connection between cosmic phenomena and staffing trends, finds an unexpected echo in our findings. The intersection of astrology and labor patterns, while initially whimsical, has now gained a degree of empirical support through our statistical analysis. It appears that the cosmic workplace may hold more sway over earthly matters than previously imagined.

Furthermore, our study not only adds a dash of interstellar charm to the field of research but also underscores the need to approach unconventional hypotheses with an open mind. The seemingly outlandish premise of our investigation, inspired by cultural artifacts such as internet memes and science fiction, has yielded tangible results that challenge the boundaries of traditional inquiry.

In light of these findings, it's clear that the enigmatic dance of celestial bodies may have unforeseen ramifications for earthly endeavors, providing a whimsical counterpoint to the often rigid world of statistical analysis. As we continue to unravel the cosmic mysteries of our universe, it's worth remembering that even in the realm of research, there's always room for inexplicable phenomena and unexpected correlations. After all, the universe is full of surprises, and statistics are no exception!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Venus and Mercury and The number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Vexing Venus and Mercurial Metrics: Exploring the Eccentric Relationship Between Planetary Proximity and Nursing Personnel in Indiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents an unconventional examination of the possible relationship between the distance separating Venus and Mercury with the number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Leveraging data from Astropy's meticulous calculations and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a cosmic quest to shed light on this enigmatic correlation. Despite the celestial nature of our inquiry, we unearthed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7142437 (p < 0.05) for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our findings suggest that while the paths of planets may seem unrelated to earthly matters, there may be an unforeseen association between cosmic choreography and the healthcare workforce. This research will boldly go where no statistical analysis has gone before, adding a touch of whimsy to the often serious world of data analysis.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
With the increasing importance of interdisciplinary research, our study ventures beyond the boundaries of traditional science to explore the extraterrestrial influences on earthly matters. In this paper, we delve into the intriguing relationship between the distance separating the planets Venus and Mercury and the number of nursing assistants in the state of Indiana. We address this celestial conundrum by wielding statistical tools with the precision of a cosmic alignment.
One might ponder, "What cosmic forces could possibly impact the earthly workforce of nursing assistants in the Hoosier state?" Well, just as the planetary orbits seem unassuming at first glance, our research takes a whimsical yet rigorous stance to uncover potential correlations that may have eluded the naked eye.
The cosmic dance of Venus and Mercury around the sun, while usually receiving attention from astronomers and astrologers alike, has seldom been explored in the context of healthcare staffing. As we embark on this intellectually daring journey, we aim to infuse a touch of levity and curiosity into the often dour world of statistical analysis. After all, who said science can't have a sense of humor, or that data analysis can't be a bit of a galactic guessing game?
This study not only contributes to the burgeoning field of astro-health econometrics (a term we're coining right now), but also offers a novel perspective on the intertwined nature of the cosmos and the healthcare industry. Our findings will not only shed light on this quirky association between planetary positions and workforce demographics but will also bring a smile to the faces of data enthusiasts and stargazers alike - a celestial crossover if you will.
In the sections that follow, we will unravel the methods, results, and implications of our study, boldly going where no statistical analysis has gone before. So fasten your seatbelts, for we are about to embark on a statistically significant, scientifically speculative, and splendidly silly odyssey through space and workforce statistics.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the peculiar linkage between the distance separating Venus and Mercury and the number of nursing assistants in Indiana has unveiled some unexpectedly intriguing results. Evidently, the cosmic dance between these neighboring planets managed to twirl its way into the terrestrial workforce, much to the amazement of our research team.
Upon crunching the numbers, we uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7142437, with an r-squared of 0.5101441, for the period of 2012 to 2022. In other words, the proximity of Venus and Mercury appears to have a noticeable influence on the number of nursing assistants bustling about in the Hoosier state. Who would have thought that the gravitational tugs and celestial ballet of these planets might have an impact on healthcare staffing?
In our scatterplot (Fig.1), the tight cluster of data points further illustrates the strong relationship between this cosmic odd couple and the earthly caregivers. The scatterplot practically screams, "Look at me, I'm statistically significant and cosmically cool!"
While some may have initially dismissed this investigation as a flight of fancy, our findings bring a touch of cosmic whimsy to the otherwise mundane realm of workforce statistics. It's a reminder that beneath the stiff veneer of data analysis, there's a universe of quirky correlations just waiting to be discovered.
We, of course, acknowledge the limitations of our study and the perplexing nature of these findings. But hey, science and statistics are nothing if not full of surprises. And if we can bring a bit of intergalactic charm to the world of research, then we consider it a celestial win-win!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our cosmic escapade into the whimsical world of astro-health econometrics has yielded some truly captivating insights. Who would have thought that the distance between Venus and Mercury could have a hand in shaping the bustling workforce of nursing assistants in Indiana? The statistical tango between these planetary neighbors and the earthly caregivers has left us not only astounded but also immensely entertained.

As we bid adieu to this offbeat odyssey, it is crucial to underscore the vital importance of injecting a touch of levity and curiosity into the often daunting domain of statistical analysis. After all, statistics shouldn't just be about gravely pondering over p-values and r-squared values; it's about uncovering the playful, the peculiar, and the profoundly surprising relationships that lurk within the labyrinth of data.

Our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7142437 and an r-squared of 0.5101441, underscore the remarkable interconnectedness of the cosmos and the healthcare industry. And let's not forget the stellar performance of the scatterplot, which practically winks at us and whispers, "Hey there, I'm cosmically cool and statistically significant!"

While the limitations of our study and the unexpected nature of these findings may prompt some raised eyebrows, it's important to remember that science and statistics are full of delightful surprises. And if we can inspire a few smiles and a sense of wonder along the way, then we consider our mission a resounding success.

In the grand tradition of cosmic discoveries and statistical quirks, we firmly assert that no further research is needed in this space. It's high time we let Venus and Mercury carry on with their celestial choreography while we turn our statistical telescopes to a new, equally enigmatic frontier. After all, there's a universe of quirky correlations waiting to be unveiled!

So, here's to the celestial dance of data, the cosmic charm of statistics, and the perpetual pursuit of the preposterously peculiar in the realms of research. Until we meet again, may the statistical forces be ever in your favor!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Vexing Venus and Mercurial Metrics: Exploring the Eccentric Relationship Between Planetary Proximity and Nursing Personnel in Indiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Interstellar Journal of Interdisciplinary Nursing Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Vexing Venus and Mercurial Metrics: Exploring the Eccentric Relationship Between Planetary Proximity and Nursing Personnel in Indiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Interstellar Planetary Nursing Alliance


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Vexing Venus and Mercurial Metrics: Exploring the Eccentric Relationship Between Planetary Proximity and Nursing Personnel in Indiana with an abstract of This paper presents an unconventional examination of the possible relationship between the distance separating Venus and Mercury with the number of nursing assistants in Indiana. Leveraging data from Astropy's meticulous calculations and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a cosmic quest to shed light on this enigmatic correlation. Despite the celestial nature of our inquiry, we unearthed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7142437 (p < 0.05) for the time period spanning 2012 to 2022. Our findings suggest that while the paths of planets may seem unrelated to earthly matters, there may be an unforeseen association between cosmic choreography and the healthcare workforce. This research will boldly go where no statistical analysis has gone before, adding a touch of whimsy to the often serious world of data analysis.

ChatGPT:

Venus, Mercury, planetary proximity, nursing personnel, Indiana, Astropy, celestial correlation, correlation coefficient, Bureau of Labor Statistics, healthcare workforce, statistical analysis, cosmic choreography, data analysis, relationship between planets and nursing assistants

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The distance between Venus and Mercury
Detailed data title: The average distance between Venus and Mercury as measured on the first day of each month
Source: Caclculated using Astropy
Additional Info: I wrote a Python script using Astropy to calculate the distance between the named planets on the first day of each month for every year.

See what else correlates with The distance between Venus and Mercury

The number of nursing assistants in Indiana
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of nursing assistants in Indiana
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of nursing assistants in Indiana

Correlation r = 0.7142437 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5101441 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 51% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of nursing assistants in Indiana) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The distance between Venus and Mercury) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.014. 0.0135388645795837870000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.71 in 1.4% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 74 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.2, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The distance between Venus and Mercury (Planetary distance (AU))0.8244550.7627260.7812860.7959990.7553230.8031850.7495580.7934030.7639660.8110380.727612
The number of nursing assistants in Indiana (Nursing Assistants)3318031940315503015030910315203022030890301203155029200




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.824455,0.762726,0.781286,0.795999,0.755323,0.803185,0.749558,0.793403,0.763966,0.811038,0.727612,])
array_2 = np.array([33180,31940,31550,30150,30910,31520,30220,30890,30120,31550,29200,])
array_1_name = "The distance between Venus and Mercury"
array_2_name = "The number of nursing assistants in Indiana"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2732 · Black Variable ID: 1957 · Red Variable ID: 19066
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0