about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,681 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the second variable is United Rentals' stock price (URI).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As household spending on meat and poultry rises, more backyard barbecues are happening. This increase in outdoor grilling is leading to a surge in demand for rental equipment, including United Rentals' products. So, the sizzle of steaks is actually firing up the stock price of United Rentals!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Image Prompt: Generate an image of a sunny backyard filled with colorful food. A group of people gather around a sizzling BBQ grill as plumes of savory smoke fill the air. The scene is brimming with stacks of meat, poultry, fish, and eggs on display, creating a vibrant and mouth-watering spectacle. In the background, a high-tech stock ticker displays the rising price of United Rentals' stock (URI), symbolizing the increased demand for equipment due to more people injuring themselves during the BBQs. The atmosphere is joyful, with the laughter and chatter of the people adding to the lively ambiance. Ensure the visual representation is dynamic and captivating, capturing the bustling activity and the tantalizing food spread amidst the technological nod to the stock market. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' stock price (URI). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Surrealism Low poly High-tech Art nouveau Glitch art
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' stock price (URI), in the following situation: Because more money on meat means more BBQs, and more BBQs means more people injure themselves, and more injuries mean more demand for United Rentals' equipment.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sunny backyard, a group of people gather around a sizzling BBQ grill, surrounded by stacks of meat, poultry, fish, and eggs. The aroma of the food fills the air as laughter and chatter fill the scene. Nearby, a stock ticker displays the rising price of United Rentals' stock (URI), symbolizing the increased demand for equipment due to more people injuring themselves during the BBQs.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In a sunny backyard, a group of people gather around a sizzling BBQ grill, surrounded by stacks of meat, poultry, fish, and eggs. The aroma of the food fills the air as laughter and chatter fill the scene. Nearby, a stock ticker displays the rising price of United Rentals' stock (URI), symbolizing the increased demand for equipment due to more people injuring themselves during the BBQs. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Image Prompt: Generate an image of a sunny backyard filled with colorful food. A group of people gather around a sizzling BBQ grill as plumes of savory smoke fill the air. The scene is brimming with stacks of meat, poultry, fish, and eggs on display, creating a vibrant and mouth-watering spectacle. In the background, a high-tech stock ticker displays the rising price of United Rentals' stock (URI), symbolizing the increased demand for equipment due to more people injuring themselves during the BBQs. The atmosphere is joyful, with the laughter and chatter of the people adding to the lively ambiance. Ensure the visual representation is dynamic and captivating, capturing the bustling activity and the tantalizing food spread amidst the technological nod to the stock market.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs caused United Rentals' stock price (URI) to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Meats Market: A Poultry Tale of Household Spending and Stock Prices

Journal of Gastronomical Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' stock price (URI). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Meats Market: A Poultry Tale of Household Spending and Stock Prices

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aim to uncover the meaty connection between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' (URI) stock price. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we analyzed two seemingly unrelated variables to see if they're truly cut from the same meaty cloth. Surprisingly, our statistical analysis revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2002 to 2022. These findings indicate that there is, indeed, more than just a "chicken and egg" relationship between household meat expenditures and URI stock price movements. Our results bring a whole new meaning to the phrase "bringing home the bacon," affirming that market movements can be influenced by dietary habits in a way that's truly "egg-citing."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' stock price (URI). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Meats Market: A Poultry Tale of Household Spending and Stock Prices

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aim to uncover the meaty connection between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' (URI) stock price. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we analyzed two seemingly unrelated variables to see if they're truly cut from the same meaty cloth. Surprisingly, our statistical analysis revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2002 to 2022. These findings indicate that there is, indeed, more than just a "chicken and egg" relationship between household meat expenditures and URI stock price movements. Our results bring a whole new meaning to the phrase "bringing home the bacon," affirming that market movements can be influenced by dietary habits in a way that's truly "egg-citing."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Ladies and gentlemen, meat-lovers and stock-market enthusiasts, welcome to the meaty world of our research paper. This study isn't just your average "beef" about statistics and market trends; it's a "poultry" tale of household spending and stock prices that's sure to leave you hungry for more.

As we delve into the world of meat, poultry, fish, eggs, and stock prices, we aim to connect the dots between what's on your plate and what's on the stock exchange. But enough with the "bacon" around the bush, let's cut to the chase and tenderize the details of our findings.

In this "grilliant" endeavor, we used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics to conduct a thorough analysis of two seemingly unrelated variables. We weren't just "meat-ing" around; our goal was to determine if households' meat expenditures and United Rentals' (URI) stock price were truly "meant" to be together.

Surprisingly (or should I say "steak-sily"?), our statistical analysis unveiled a juicy correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2002 to 2022. It seems that the financial world and culinary world aren't as "chicken" as we thought! These "egg-cellent" findings indicate a strong connection between what's sizzling in the meat market and what's sizzling in the stock market.

And if that doesn't make you crack a smile like a "shell-shocked" egg, our results have flipped the script on the phrase "bringing home the bacon." It turns out that market movements and dietary habits can be as closely intertwined as "ham" and "eggs," proving that what's on our tables might just be impacting what's on the trading floor.

So, join us as we embark on this "meat"-y journey, where charts and graphs meet chops and fillets, and where the delicious aroma of data analysis is just as enticing as that of a sizzling steak. It's time to serve up some "meat"-y food for thought that'll have you questioning whether you should invest in stocks or steaks!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' stock price (URI). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Meats Market: A Poultry Tale of Household Spending and Stock Prices

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aim to uncover the meaty connection between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' (URI) stock price. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we analyzed two seemingly unrelated variables to see if they're truly cut from the same meaty cloth. Surprisingly, our statistical analysis revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2002 to 2022. These findings indicate that there is, indeed, more than just a "chicken and egg" relationship between household meat expenditures and URI stock price movements. Our results bring a whole new meaning to the phrase "bringing home the bacon," affirming that market movements can be influenced by dietary habits in a way that's truly "egg-citing."

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, meat-lovers and stock-market enthusiasts, welcome to the meaty world of our research paper. This study isn't just your average "beef" about statistics and market trends; it's a "poultry" tale of household spending and stock prices that's sure to leave you hungry for more.
As we delve into the world of meat, poultry, fish, eggs, and stock prices, we aim to connect the dots between what's on your plate and what's on the stock exchange. But enough with the "bacon" around the bush, let's cut to the chase and tenderize the details of our findings.
In this "grilliant" endeavor, we used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics to conduct a thorough analysis of two seemingly unrelated variables. We weren't just "meat-ing" around; our goal was to determine if households' meat expenditures and United Rentals' (URI) stock price were truly "meant" to be together.
Surprisingly (or should I say "steak-sily"?), our statistical analysis unveiled a juicy correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2002 to 2022. It seems that the financial world and culinary world aren't as "chicken" as we thought! These "egg-cellent" findings indicate a strong connection between what's sizzling in the meat market and what's sizzling in the stock market.
And if that doesn't make you crack a smile like a "shell-shocked" egg, our results have flipped the script on the phrase "bringing home the bacon." It turns out that market movements and dietary habits can be as closely intertwined as "ham" and "eggs," proving that what's on our tables might just be impacting what's on the trading floor.
So, join us as we embark on this "meat"-y journey, where charts and graphs meet chops and fillets, and where the delicious aroma of data analysis is just as enticing as that of a sizzling steak. It's time to serve up some "meat"-y food for thought that'll have you questioning whether you should invest in stocks or steaks!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith and Doe (2010) conducted a comprehensive analysis of household spending patterns, examining the intricate relationship between consumer expenditures on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and their impact on the broader economy. Their findings provided valuable insights into the consumption patterns of protein-rich foods and their implications for market dynamics. Similarly, Jones (2015) explored the behavioral economics of meat purchases and its potential influence on investment decisions, shedding light on the interconnectedness of dietary choices and financial behaviors.

In "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan, the author delves into the complexities of food choices in modern society, offering a thought-provoking perspective on the cultural, economic, and environmental factors shaping our dietary preferences. This work draws attention to the nuanced relationships between food consumption and broader societal patterns, raising intriguing questions about the potential ripple effects of meat-related expenditures on financial markets.

On a more fictional note, "The Grapes of Wrath" by John Steinbeck offers a literary exploration of human struggle and resilience in the face of economic challenges. While the novel's focus is not explicitly on meat consumption or stock prices, its portrayal of the human experience in times of financial hardship offers a poignant backdrop for considering the interconnectedness of various facets of life, including dietary habits and economic conditions.

Now, turning to unconventional sources, a thorough review of CVS receipts surprisingly revealed an unforeseen pattern in the purchases of meat products and their correlation with fluctuations in stock prices. This unexpected approach to literature review yielded some "meat"-y insights that added a touch of humor to the otherwise serious discourse on market analysis and consumer behavior. While this unconventional method may raise some eyebrows, it certainly provided a unique perspective on the meat-stock relationship.

In light of these diverse sources, it becomes clear that exploring the intersection of household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs with stock prices is not only a matter of financial significance but also a "meat"-y opportunity to infuse some humor and creativity into the world of academic research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' stock price (URI). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Meats Market: A Poultry Tale of Household Spending and Stock Prices

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aim to uncover the meaty connection between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' (URI) stock price. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we analyzed two seemingly unrelated variables to see if they're truly cut from the same meaty cloth. Surprisingly, our statistical analysis revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2002 to 2022. These findings indicate that there is, indeed, more than just a "chicken and egg" relationship between household meat expenditures and URI stock price movements. Our results bring a whole new meaning to the phrase "bringing home the bacon," affirming that market movements can be influenced by dietary habits in a way that's truly "egg-citing."

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, meat-lovers and stock-market enthusiasts, welcome to the meaty world of our research paper. This study isn't just your average "beef" about statistics and market trends; it's a "poultry" tale of household spending and stock prices that's sure to leave you hungry for more.
As we delve into the world of meat, poultry, fish, eggs, and stock prices, we aim to connect the dots between what's on your plate and what's on the stock exchange. But enough with the "bacon" around the bush, let's cut to the chase and tenderize the details of our findings.
In this "grilliant" endeavor, we used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics to conduct a thorough analysis of two seemingly unrelated variables. We weren't just "meat-ing" around; our goal was to determine if households' meat expenditures and United Rentals' (URI) stock price were truly "meant" to be together.
Surprisingly (or should I say "steak-sily"?), our statistical analysis unveiled a juicy correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2002 to 2022. It seems that the financial world and culinary world aren't as "chicken" as we thought! These "egg-cellent" findings indicate a strong connection between what's sizzling in the meat market and what's sizzling in the stock market.
And if that doesn't make you crack a smile like a "shell-shocked" egg, our results have flipped the script on the phrase "bringing home the bacon." It turns out that market movements and dietary habits can be as closely intertwined as "ham" and "eggs," proving that what's on our tables might just be impacting what's on the trading floor.
So, join us as we embark on this "meat"-y journey, where charts and graphs meet chops and fillets, and where the delicious aroma of data analysis is just as enticing as that of a sizzling steak. It's time to serve up some "meat"-y food for thought that'll have you questioning whether you should invest in stocks or steaks!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Now that we've got you salivating for some meaty data, let's dig into the meat of our research methodology. We embarked on this "grilliant" endeavor to uncover the saucy connection between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' (URI) stock price.

First off, we carefully selected our ingredients – I mean, our data sources – from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). We "meat" the challenge of collecting and verifying this data with gusto, ensuring that our statistical stew would be spiced just right for our analysis.

Speaking of statistical stew, let's talk about our meat-a-analysis approach. We didn't just toss everything into the pot and hope for the best; no, we conducted a thorough time-series analysis using robust econometric methods. We performed various delectable tests, such as unit root tests, cointegration analysis, and error correction modeling – each step seasoned with just the right amount of statistical seasoning to ensure a flavorful outcome.

Now, let's not forget about the marinade – I mean, the variables. We meticulously examined the annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs, treating it like the prime rib of our dataset. On the other side of the grill, we closely monitored United Rentals' (URI) stock price movements, ensuring that it was grilled – I mean, analyzed – to perfection.

Once we had our meat and potatoes – I mean, variables – ready, we used statistical software to tenderize the data, performing regression analyses and calculating correlation coefficients with the precision of a master chef. We even used custom-built programs to slice and dice the data in ways that would make any data scientist's mouth water.

Throughout this process, we took measures to ensure the robustness and "well-done"-ness of our analysis, conducting sensitivity analyses and "steaking" our claim to statistical significance. We didn't leave a single "rare" detail unexplored, making sure to account for potential confounders and lurking variables that could have added an extra kick to our meat-and-greet with statistical significance.

In the end, after letting our analysis simmer and stew, we ended up with results that were as juicy as a perfectly grilled steak – a "meat"-y correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2002 to 2022. This "egg-cellent" statistical finding assured us that we weren't just "meat"-ing around and that the connection between household meat expenditures and URI stock price movements was more than just a tasty coincidence. In fact, our results were so "meat"-y that they beg the question: Are we dealing with a bull market, or just a lot of bull – err, beef?

So, there you have it – our "meat"-y methodology that brought science and humor together in a way that's as delightful as a well-seasoned barbecue. We hope you've enjoyed our bountiful journey into the world of meat and markets, and we invite you to sink your teeth into our findings with as much gusto as you would dig into a perfectly cooked T-bone steak. Cheers to "meat"-ing data with a side of stock analysis!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' stock price (URI). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9527543, r-squared of 0.9077408, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Meats Market: A Poultry Tale of Household Spending and Stock Prices

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aim to uncover the meaty connection between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' (URI) stock price. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we analyzed two seemingly unrelated variables to see if they're truly cut from the same meaty cloth. Surprisingly, our statistical analysis revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2002 to 2022. These findings indicate that there is, indeed, more than just a "chicken and egg" relationship between household meat expenditures and URI stock price movements. Our results bring a whole new meaning to the phrase "bringing home the bacon," affirming that market movements can be influenced by dietary habits in a way that's truly "egg-citing."

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen, meat-lovers and stock-market enthusiasts, welcome to the meaty world of our research paper. This study isn't just your average "beef" about statistics and market trends; it's a "poultry" tale of household spending and stock prices that's sure to leave you hungry for more.
As we delve into the world of meat, poultry, fish, eggs, and stock prices, we aim to connect the dots between what's on your plate and what's on the stock exchange. But enough with the "bacon" around the bush, let's cut to the chase and tenderize the details of our findings.
In this "grilliant" endeavor, we used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics to conduct a thorough analysis of two seemingly unrelated variables. We weren't just "meat-ing" around; our goal was to determine if households' meat expenditures and United Rentals' (URI) stock price were truly "meant" to be together.
Surprisingly (or should I say "steak-sily"?), our statistical analysis unveiled a juicy correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2002 to 2022. It seems that the financial world and culinary world aren't as "chicken" as we thought! These "egg-cellent" findings indicate a strong connection between what's sizzling in the meat market and what's sizzling in the stock market.
And if that doesn't make you crack a smile like a "shell-shocked" egg, our results have flipped the script on the phrase "bringing home the bacon." It turns out that market movements and dietary habits can be as closely intertwined as "ham" and "eggs," proving that what's on our tables might just be impacting what's on the trading floor.
So, join us as we embark on this "meat"-y journey, where charts and graphs meet chops and fillets, and where the delicious aroma of data analysis is just as enticing as that of a sizzling steak. It's time to serve up some "meat"-y food for thought that'll have you questioning whether you should invest in stocks or steaks!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the connection between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' (URI) stock price yielded some "meat"-y findings. From 2002 to 2022, we found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and an r-squared value of 0.9077408, with a p-value less than 0.01. These results suggest that there's more to this relationship than just a "chicken and egg" scenario; it's nothing short of an "egg-ceptional" discovery.

Fig. 1 showcases the striking scatterplot that visually captures the sizzling connection between these variables. As you can see, the data points form a "meat"-y pattern that's as clear as day. It's like a "well-done" steak – you can't miss it!

Our findings serve as a testament to the surprises that emerge when seemingly unrelated variables are put to the statistical test. This "beefy" correlation coefficient has given us an all-new perspective on the market dynamics, adding a flavorful twist to the world of financial analysis.

In summary, our results show that the meat market and stock market dance to the beat of their own drumsticks, demonstrating that what's on the dinner table might have more of an impact on portfolio performance than we ever "sausage." These findings are not just a "tender" revelation but also a reminder that in the world of research and statistics, nothing is ever just "rare" or "well-done"; it's a spectrum of surprises, waiting to be uncovered with each data point and statistical test.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' stock price (URI). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Meats Market: A Poultry Tale of Household Spending and Stock Prices

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aim to uncover the meaty connection between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' (URI) stock price. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we analyzed two seemingly unrelated variables to see if they're truly cut from the same meaty cloth. Surprisingly, our statistical analysis revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2002 to 2022. These findings indicate that there is, indeed, more than just a "chicken and egg" relationship between household meat expenditures and URI stock price movements. Our results bring a whole new meaning to the phrase "bringing home the bacon," affirming that market movements can be influenced by dietary habits in a way that's truly "egg-citing."

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith and Doe (2010) conducted a comprehensive analysis of household spending patterns, examining the intricate relationship between consumer expenditures on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and their impact on the broader economy. Their findings provided valuable insights into the consumption patterns of protein-rich foods and their implications for market dynamics. Similarly, Jones (2015) explored the behavioral economics of meat purchases and its potential influence on investment decisions, shedding light on the interconnectedness of dietary choices and financial behaviors.
In "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan, the author delves into the complexities of food choices in modern society, offering a thought-provoking perspective on the cultural, economic, and environmental factors shaping our dietary preferences. This work draws attention to the nuanced relationships between food consumption and broader societal patterns, raising intriguing questions about the potential ripple effects of meat-related expenditures on financial markets.
On a more fictional note, "The Grapes of Wrath" by John Steinbeck offers a literary exploration of human struggle and resilience in the face of economic challenges. While the novel's focus is not explicitly on meat consumption or stock prices, its portrayal of the human experience in times of financial hardship offers a poignant backdrop for considering the interconnectedness of various facets of life, including dietary habits and economic conditions.
Now, turning to unconventional sources, a thorough review of CVS receipts surprisingly revealed an unforeseen pattern in the purchases of meat products and their correlation with fluctuations in stock prices. This unexpected approach to literature review yielded some "meat"-y insights that added a touch of humor to the otherwise serious discourse on market analysis and consumer behavior. While this unconventional method may raise some eyebrows, it certainly provided a unique perspective on the meat-stock relationship.
In light of these diverse sources, it becomes clear that exploring the intersection of household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs with stock prices is not only a matter of financial significance but also a "meat"-y opportunity to infuse some humor and creativity into the world of academic research.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the connection between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' (URI) stock price yielded some "meat"-y findings. From 2002 to 2022, we found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and an r-squared value of 0.9077408, with a p-value less than 0.01. These results suggest that there's more to this relationship than just a "chicken and egg" scenario; it's nothing short of an "egg-ceptional" discovery.
Fig. 1 showcases the striking scatterplot that visually captures the sizzling connection between these variables. As you can see, the data points form a "meat"-y pattern that's as clear as day. It's like a "well-done" steak – you can't miss it!
Our findings serve as a testament to the surprises that emerge when seemingly unrelated variables are put to the statistical test. This "beefy" correlation coefficient has given us an all-new perspective on the market dynamics, adding a flavorful twist to the world of financial analysis.
In summary, our results show that the meat market and stock market dance to the beat of their own drumsticks, demonstrating that what's on the dinner table might have more of an impact on portfolio performance than we ever "sausage." These findings are not just a "tender" revelation but also a reminder that in the world of research and statistics, nothing is ever just "rare" or "well-done"; it's a spectrum of surprises, waiting to be uncovered with each data point and statistical test.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study bring a whole new dimension to the phrase "bringing home the bacon" – they affirm that market movements can indeed be influenced by dietary habits in a way that's truly "egg-citing." Our results not only sow the seeds of a meaty correlation but also steak a claim in the food-financial dynamics realm.

The "meat"-y connection between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' (URI) stock price may seem as unexpected as finding a vegetarian at a BBQ joint, but our statistical analysis undeniably supports the prior research of Smith and Doe (2010) and Jones (2015). Just as "The Grapes of Wrath" provided a literary backdrop for contemplating the interconnectedness of various aspects of life, including dietary habits and economic conditions, our findings underscore the gravity of the "chicken and egg" relationship between consumer expenditures on protein-rich foods and their impact on the broader economy.

And let's not forget the unconventional sources! While a thorough review of CVS receipts may seem as outlandish as a tofu steak, it surprisingly yielded some "meat"-y insights. This underscores the importance of tapping into diverse perspectives in research, even if it leads to a chuckle or two.

Now, let's dig into the statistical "meat" of our results. With a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and an r-squared value of 0.9077408, our study has certainly served up a well-done analysis of the meat-market relationship. Fig. 1 showcases the striking scatterplot that visually captures the sizzling connection between household meat expenditures and URI stock price movements. It's like a "well-done" steak – you can't miss it!

In summary, our findings demonstrate that the meat market and stock market dance to the beat of their own drumsticks, proving that what's on the dinner table might have more of an impact on portfolio performance than we ever "sausage." These revelations not only tenderize our understanding of market dynamics but also remind us that in the world of research and statistics, there's always room for a "meat"-y surprise or two.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' stock price (URI). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Meats Market: A Poultry Tale of Household Spending and Stock Prices

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we aim to uncover the meaty connection between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' (URI) stock price. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we analyzed two seemingly unrelated variables to see if they're truly cut from the same meaty cloth. Surprisingly, our statistical analysis revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2002 to 2022. These findings indicate that there is, indeed, more than just a "chicken and egg" relationship between household meat expenditures and URI stock price movements. Our results bring a whole new meaning to the phrase "bringing home the bacon," affirming that market movements can be influenced by dietary habits in a way that's truly "egg-citing."

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, meat-lovers and stock-market enthusiasts, welcome to the meaty world of our research paper. This study isn't just your average "beef" about statistics and market trends; it's a "poultry" tale of household spending and stock prices that's sure to leave you hungry for more.
As we delve into the world of meat, poultry, fish, eggs, and stock prices, we aim to connect the dots between what's on your plate and what's on the stock exchange. But enough with the "bacon" around the bush, let's cut to the chase and tenderize the details of our findings.
In this "grilliant" endeavor, we used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics to conduct a thorough analysis of two seemingly unrelated variables. We weren't just "meat-ing" around; our goal was to determine if households' meat expenditures and United Rentals' (URI) stock price were truly "meant" to be together.
Surprisingly (or should I say "steak-sily"?), our statistical analysis unveiled a juicy correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2002 to 2022. It seems that the financial world and culinary world aren't as "chicken" as we thought! These "egg-cellent" findings indicate a strong connection between what's sizzling in the meat market and what's sizzling in the stock market.
And if that doesn't make you crack a smile like a "shell-shocked" egg, our results have flipped the script on the phrase "bringing home the bacon." It turns out that market movements and dietary habits can be as closely intertwined as "ham" and "eggs," proving that what's on our tables might just be impacting what's on the trading floor.
So, join us as we embark on this "meat"-y journey, where charts and graphs meet chops and fillets, and where the delicious aroma of data analysis is just as enticing as that of a sizzling steak. It's time to serve up some "meat"-y food for thought that'll have you questioning whether you should invest in stocks or steaks!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the connection between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' (URI) stock price yielded some "meat"-y findings. From 2002 to 2022, we found a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and an r-squared value of 0.9077408, with a p-value less than 0.01. These results suggest that there's more to this relationship than just a "chicken and egg" scenario; it's nothing short of an "egg-ceptional" discovery.
Fig. 1 showcases the striking scatterplot that visually captures the sizzling connection between these variables. As you can see, the data points form a "meat"-y pattern that's as clear as day. It's like a "well-done" steak – you can't miss it!
Our findings serve as a testament to the surprises that emerge when seemingly unrelated variables are put to the statistical test. This "beefy" correlation coefficient has given us an all-new perspective on the market dynamics, adding a flavorful twist to the world of financial analysis.
In summary, our results show that the meat market and stock market dance to the beat of their own drumsticks, demonstrating that what's on the dinner table might have more of an impact on portfolio performance than we ever "sausage." These findings are not just a "tender" revelation but also a reminder that in the world of research and statistics, nothing is ever just "rare" or "well-done"; it's a spectrum of surprises, waiting to be uncovered with each data point and statistical test.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

Well, folks, it's time to bring this meaty journey to a close. We've certainly uncovered some fascinating findings that have given us a whole new perspective on the market. Who would've thought that the stock market and meat market could have such a beefy connection? It's like a steak lover's dream come true!

Our results show that there's more to this relationship than just a "chicken and egg" scenario; it's more like a chicken, beef, and fish fiesta influencing stock prices. It's as if the stock market is saying, "Fish me luck! I hope these meaty data points don't grill my portfolio!"

But fear not, for our statistical analysis has shown us the "meat" of the matter. The correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 has truly raised the stakes in this game. It's an "egg-ceptional" discovery that will make you think twice before uttering the phrase "bringing home the bacon" in a financial context. After all, it seems that the market movements and dietary habits are as closely intertwined as ham and eggs – and we're not just "hamming" it up!

And so, we boldly declare that no more research is needed in this area. We've carved out the truth and laid it on a platter for all to see. The meat market and stock market may have different recipes, but they certainly share some common ingredients. It's been a pleasure serving up these findings, and we hope they've left you as "egg-cited" as we are about the "meat"-y connection we've uncovered.

In the world of research and statistics, there's always another question to explore, another hypothesis to test. But for now, let's savor the flavor of this discovery and bid adieu to this "poultry" tale of household spending and stock prices. As we say in the world of academia, that's a wrap – or should we say, that's a "rare" and "well-done" conclusion!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Meats Market: A Poultry Tale of Household Spending and Stock Prices. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Gastronomical Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Meats Market: A Poultry Tale of Household Spending and Stock Prices. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Culinary Economics and Statistics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Meats Market: A Poultry Tale of Household Spending and Stock Prices with an abstract of In this study, we aim to uncover the meaty connection between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and United Rentals' (URI) stock price. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we analyzed two seemingly unrelated variables to see if they're truly cut from the same meaty cloth. Surprisingly, our statistical analysis revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9527543 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2002 to 2022. These findings indicate that there is, indeed, more than just a "chicken and egg" relationship between household meat expenditures and URI stock price movements. Our results bring a whole new meaning to the phrase "bringing home the bacon," affirming that market movements can be influenced by dietary habits in a way that's truly "egg-citing.

ChatGPT:

meat consumption, household spending, stock prices, United Rentals, URI, poultry, fish, eggs, correlation analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, meat expenditures, market movements

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs
Detailed data title: Average annual household spend on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs

United Rentals' stock price (URI)
Detailed data title: Opening price of United Rentals (URI) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with United Rentals' stock price (URI)

Correlation r = 0.9527543 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9077408 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., United Rentals' stock price (URI)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.8E-11. 0.0000000000277575573164092970
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 2.8E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 36,026,224,808 random variables You don't actually need 36 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.89, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs (Household spend)798825880764797777846841784832852856892896890944961980107511151216
United Rentals' stock price (URI) (Stock price)22.6210.819.3618.9823.5925.618.339.259.9223.1430.254777.27103.1171.11107.88172.92100.31168.41234333.26




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([798,825,880,764,797,777,846,841,784,832,852,856,892,896,890,944,961,980,1075,1115,1216,])
array_2 = np.array([22.62,10.8,19.36,18.98,23.59,25.6,18.33,9.25,9.92,23.14,30.25,47,77.27,103.11,71.11,107.88,172.92,100.31,168.41,234,333.26,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs"
array_2_name = "United Rentals' stock price (URI)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 2681 · Black Variable ID: 19888 · Red Variable ID: 1836
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0