about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,595 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and the second variable is Geothermal power generated in Russia.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The soybeans were so full of energy, they inadvertently transmitted a power-boosting gene to the Earth's core. As the soybeans multiplied, so did the underground power source, leading to an unexpected rise in geothermal activity in Russia. It's a case of leguminous legacies and subterranean soy shocks!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Woodblock painting ]: An intricate woodblock painting that showcases a scene of a sprawling Missouri soybean field, with towering GMO soybean plants reaching towards the sky. The lush green leaves and sturdy stems are carefully detailed, capturing the vitality of the plants. The roots of the soybeans are depicted as winding and intertwining with a powerful geothermal energy source underground, creating a stunning visual representation of a sprawling underground power grid. The energy surges through the roots like natural power cables, creating a sense of movement and energy. The scene then transitions to a vast Russian landscape, where geothermal power stations are shown humming with increased energy, serving as a striking contrast to the tranquility of the soybean field. The woodblock style adds a timeless and textured quality to the imagery, enhancing the sense of collaboration between the mighty soybeans and the earth's geothermal energy. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and Geothermal power generated in Russia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art Concept art Steampunk Woodblock painting Voxel art
ChatGPT: Woodblock painting

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and Geothermal power generated in Russia, in the following situation: The genetically modified soybeans grew so big and so fast that their roots inadvertently tapped into a geothermal energy source, creating a massive underground power grid that extended all the way to Russia. The soybeans were essentially acting as organic power cables, delivering a steady stream of energy that boosted geothermal power production in Russia. And to think, it all started with a simple soybean seed and a little bit of scientific tinkering!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sprawling Missouri soybean field, towering GMO soybean plants with lush green leaves and sturdy stems reached towards the sky. Beneath the surface, their roots coiled and entwined with a powerful geothermal energy source, creating a sprawling underground power grid. The energy surged through the roots like natural power cables, traveling all the way to Russia. In a vast Russian landscape, geothermal power stations hummed with increased energy, thanks to the unexpected collaboration between the mighty soybeans and the earth's geothermal energy.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Woodblock painting ] and depicting this scene: In a sprawling Missouri soybean field, towering GMO soybean plants with lush green leaves and sturdy stems reached towards the sky. Beneath the surface, their roots coiled and entwined with a powerful geothermal energy source, creating a sprawling underground power grid. The energy surged through the roots like natural power cables, traveling all the way to Russia. In a vast Russian landscape, geothermal power stations hummed with increased energy, thanks to the unexpected collaboration between the mighty soybeans and the earth's geothermal energy. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Woodblock painting ]: An intricate woodblock painting that showcases a scene of a sprawling Missouri soybean field, with towering GMO soybean plants reaching towards the sky. The lush green leaves and sturdy stems are carefully detailed, capturing the vitality of the plants. The roots of the soybeans are depicted as winding and intertwining with a powerful geothermal energy source underground, creating a stunning visual representation of a sprawling underground power grid. The energy surges through the roots like natural power cables, creating a sense of movement and energy. The scene then transitions to a vast Russian landscape, where geothermal power stations are shown humming with increased energy, serving as a striking contrast to the tranquility of the soybean field. The woodblock style adds a timeless and textured quality to the imagery, enhancing the sense of collaboration between the mighty soybeans and the earth's geothermal energy.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in soybeans in Missouri caused Geothermal power generated in Russia to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Toy Soy and Russian Boil: The Correlation Between GMO Soybean Cultivation in Missouri and Geothermal Power in Russia

The Journal of Agro-Geothermal Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and Geothermal power generated in Russia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9527066 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Toy Soy and Russian Boil: The Correlation Between GMO Soybean Cultivation in Missouri and Geothermal Power in Russia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the unexpectedly interconnected worlds of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri and geothermal power generation in Russia. Despite their seemingly disparate natures, our research reveals a striking correlation between the two, with a coefficient so high it'll make your head spin! Using data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a coefficient of 0.9527066, and with p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. Our findings are nothing short of fascinating and will surely ignite excitement in both the agricultural and energy sectors. So, buckle up and prepare to be amazed by the soy-ful world of geothermal power!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and Geothermal power generated in Russia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Toy Soy and Russian Boil: The Correlation Between GMO Soybean Cultivation in Missouri and Geothermal Power in Russia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the unexpectedly interconnected worlds of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri and geothermal power generation in Russia. Despite their seemingly disparate natures, our research reveals a striking correlation between the two, with a coefficient so high it'll make your head spin! Using data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a coefficient of 0.9527066, and with p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. Our findings are nothing short of fascinating and will surely ignite excitement in both the agricultural and energy sectors. So, buckle up and prepare to be amazed by the soy-ful world of geothermal power!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ladies and gentlemen, brace yourselves for a journey through the incredible realms of genetically modified soybeans and geothermal power. Today, we embark on a quest to unravel the mysterious connection between these two seemingly unrelated entities. As we delve into this research, we promise to deliver a soy-rrific blend of science, statistics, and surprises that will leave you shaking your head in astonishment.

Picture this: a sprawling field of GMO soybeans in the heart of Missouri, silently engaging in a molecular dance of epic proportions. Meanwhile, thousands of miles away, deep within the enigmatic terrain of Russia, the earth itself is bubbling with geothermal energy. It seems like an unlikely pair, doesn't it? But hold on to your lab coats, because we're about to reveal the unexpected link that binds these two marvels together.

While some may think that studying soybeans and geothermal power is about as exciting as watching paint dry in a thermodynamics lecture, our findings will make you question everything you thought you knew about agricultural and energy research. We've combed through mountains of data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration, carefully sieving through the statistics like a pair of enthusiastic science detectives. And let me tell you, the results are hotter than a freshly brewed cup of geothermal steam.

But before we unveil the jaw-dropping numbers, let's take a moment to appreciate the sheer audacity of this endeavor. The soybean may have started its journey innocuously enough, tucked away in the heartland of the United States, but little did it know that its influence would extend as far as the geysers and hot springs of Russia. It's a tale of two vastly different entities colliding in a statistical tango that would make even the most seasoned research aficionado nod in approval.

So, grab a pen and paper (or open a spreadsheet if you're feeling fancy) because we're about to embark on a journey of epic proportions. Our findings are about to turn the world of agricultural and energy research on its head, so fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a rollercoaster ride through the soy-dium-rich fields of Missouri and the sizzling geothermal landscapes of Russia!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and Geothermal power generated in Russia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Toy Soy and Russian Boil: The Correlation Between GMO Soybean Cultivation in Missouri and Geothermal Power in Russia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the unexpectedly interconnected worlds of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri and geothermal power generation in Russia. Despite their seemingly disparate natures, our research reveals a striking correlation between the two, with a coefficient so high it'll make your head spin! Using data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a coefficient of 0.9527066, and with p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. Our findings are nothing short of fascinating and will surely ignite excitement in both the agricultural and energy sectors. So, buckle up and prepare to be amazed by the soy-ful world of geothermal power!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, brace yourselves for a journey through the incredible realms of genetically modified soybeans and geothermal power. Today, we embark on a quest to unravel the mysterious connection between these two seemingly unrelated entities. As we delve into this research, we promise to deliver a soy-rrific blend of science, statistics, and surprises that will leave you shaking your head in astonishment.
Picture this: a sprawling field of GMO soybeans in the heart of Missouri, silently engaging in a molecular dance of epic proportions. Meanwhile, thousands of miles away, deep within the enigmatic terrain of Russia, the earth itself is bubbling with geothermal energy. It seems like an unlikely pair, doesn't it? But hold on to your lab coats, because we're about to reveal the unexpected link that binds these two marvels together.
While some may think that studying soybeans and geothermal power is about as exciting as watching paint dry in a thermodynamics lecture, our findings will make you question everything you thought you knew about agricultural and energy research. We've combed through mountains of data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration, carefully sieving through the statistics like a pair of enthusiastic science detectives. And let me tell you, the results are hotter than a freshly brewed cup of geothermal steam.
But before we unveil the jaw-dropping numbers, let's take a moment to appreciate the sheer audacity of this endeavor. The soybean may have started its journey innocuously enough, tucked away in the heartland of the United States, but little did it know that its influence would extend as far as the geysers and hot springs of Russia. It's a tale of two vastly different entities colliding in a statistical tango that would make even the most seasoned research aficionado nod in approval.
So, grab a pen and paper (or open a spreadsheet if you're feeling fancy) because we're about to embark on a journey of epic proportions. Our findings are about to turn the world of agricultural and energy research on its head, so fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a rollercoaster ride through the soy-dium-rich fields of Missouri and the sizzling geothermal landscapes of Russia!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connections between genetically modified soybeans and geothermal power may seem as disparate as a tofu and lava, yet the emerging body of literature suggests otherwise. Smith et al. (2018) shed light on the potential environmental impact of GMO soybean cultivation in their study "Soybeans and Sustainability," while Doe and Jones (2020) explored the economic implications of geothermal energy in their work, "Geothermal Power: Hot or Not?"

However, as we delved deeper into the literature, we stumbled upon some unexpected gems, giving new meaning to the phrase "soy-sational research." Books such as "The Soybean Chronicles: A Tale of Genes and Green" by Tofu McGravy and "Geothermal Goulash: Unearthing Russia's Energy Landscape" by Boris Volcanovich provided a refreshingly unconventional perspective on the subject matter.

Turning from the non-fiction genre to the world of fiction, we stumbled upon "Soybeans of the Galaxy" by Soylo Ren and "Geothermal Grandeur: The Heat Awakens" by George Lavaflame. Although these literary works may not have been peer-reviewed, they certainly sparked our imagination and made us ponder the unexplored intersections between soybeans and geothermal power.

In a somewhat tangential yet oddly relevant manner, we found inspiration from films such as "Soy Story" and "Geothermal Gurus: The Steam Strikes Back." While these cinematic creations may not have featured scholarly discourse, they provided a unique lens through which to view the unexpected connections between the soybean fields of Missouri and the geothermal wonders of Russia.

While the academic rigor of these sources may vary, their impact on our understanding of this peculiar link between GMO soybeans and geothermal power cannot be overstated. As we navigate through this bizarrely entwined landscape, it becomes clear that the soy-ful world of geothermal power is full of surprises, waiting to be uncovered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and Geothermal power generated in Russia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2000 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Toy Soy and Russian Boil: The Correlation Between GMO Soybean Cultivation in Missouri and Geothermal Power in Russia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the unexpectedly interconnected worlds of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri and geothermal power generation in Russia. Despite their seemingly disparate natures, our research reveals a striking correlation between the two, with a coefficient so high it'll make your head spin! Using data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a coefficient of 0.9527066, and with p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. Our findings are nothing short of fascinating and will surely ignite excitement in both the agricultural and energy sectors. So, buckle up and prepare to be amazed by the soy-ful world of geothermal power!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, brace yourselves for a journey through the incredible realms of genetically modified soybeans and geothermal power. Today, we embark on a quest to unravel the mysterious connection between these two seemingly unrelated entities. As we delve into this research, we promise to deliver a soy-rrific blend of science, statistics, and surprises that will leave you shaking your head in astonishment.
Picture this: a sprawling field of GMO soybeans in the heart of Missouri, silently engaging in a molecular dance of epic proportions. Meanwhile, thousands of miles away, deep within the enigmatic terrain of Russia, the earth itself is bubbling with geothermal energy. It seems like an unlikely pair, doesn't it? But hold on to your lab coats, because we're about to reveal the unexpected link that binds these two marvels together.
While some may think that studying soybeans and geothermal power is about as exciting as watching paint dry in a thermodynamics lecture, our findings will make you question everything you thought you knew about agricultural and energy research. We've combed through mountains of data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration, carefully sieving through the statistics like a pair of enthusiastic science detectives. And let me tell you, the results are hotter than a freshly brewed cup of geothermal steam.
But before we unveil the jaw-dropping numbers, let's take a moment to appreciate the sheer audacity of this endeavor. The soybean may have started its journey innocuously enough, tucked away in the heartland of the United States, but little did it know that its influence would extend as far as the geysers and hot springs of Russia. It's a tale of two vastly different entities colliding in a statistical tango that would make even the most seasoned research aficionado nod in approval.
So, grab a pen and paper (or open a spreadsheet if you're feeling fancy) because we're about to embark on a journey of epic proportions. Our findings are about to turn the world of agricultural and energy research on its head, so fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a rollercoaster ride through the soy-dium-rich fields of Missouri and the sizzling geothermal landscapes of Russia!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mysterious entanglement of GMO soybeans in Missouri and geothermal power in Russia, our research methodology was as carefully crafted as a complex chemical equation. First, we scoured the vast expanse of the internet, much like intrepid explorers on a quest for scientific treasure, in search of relevant data. Our primary sources included the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, with data spanning from 2000 to 2021.

Now, here's where the fun begins. Our team of intrepid scientists engaged in a series of elaborate and intricately designed statistical dances, akin to a group of lively electrons orbiting a nucleus, to tease out the hidden connections between our two seemingly disparate variables. We utilized advanced regression analyses, unleashing the power of sophisticated statistical software to sift through the data with the precision of a molecular sieve.

Furthermore, our methods involved comprehensive data cleansing and wrangling, as we endeavored to ensure that our statistical models were as robust and reliable as Einstein's theory of general relativity. We carefully tested for multicollinearity, heteroscedasticity, and other statistical demons that threatened to throw off our calculations like mischievous gremlins.

To quantify the extent of the relationship between GMO soybean cultivation in Missouri and geothermal power generation in Russia, we employed a series of statistical techniques that could make even the most ardent data enthusiast whistle in admiration. Our model was carefully selected, tested, and validated to ensure that our results were as sturdy as a particle accelerator at full throttle.

Finally, after performing a dazzling array of statistical acrobatics, we emerged with a coefficient of 0.9527066, with p < 0.01, unveiling a correlation as strong and resilient as graphene under pressure. Our findings have illuminated a path through the scientific wilderness, redefining the boundaries of research, and transforming the seemingly mundane into the extraordinary. So, buckle up and prepare to be gobsmacked by the astonishing correlation we've uncovered between these seemingly unrelated entities!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and Geothermal power generated in Russia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2000 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9527066, r-squared of 0.9076498, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Toy Soy and Russian Boil: The Correlation Between GMO Soybean Cultivation in Missouri and Geothermal Power in Russia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the unexpectedly interconnected worlds of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri and geothermal power generation in Russia. Despite their seemingly disparate natures, our research reveals a striking correlation between the two, with a coefficient so high it'll make your head spin! Using data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a coefficient of 0.9527066, and with p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. Our findings are nothing short of fascinating and will surely ignite excitement in both the agricultural and energy sectors. So, buckle up and prepare to be amazed by the soy-ful world of geothermal power!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen, brace yourselves for a journey through the incredible realms of genetically modified soybeans and geothermal power. Today, we embark on a quest to unravel the mysterious connection between these two seemingly unrelated entities. As we delve into this research, we promise to deliver a soy-rrific blend of science, statistics, and surprises that will leave you shaking your head in astonishment.
Picture this: a sprawling field of GMO soybeans in the heart of Missouri, silently engaging in a molecular dance of epic proportions. Meanwhile, thousands of miles away, deep within the enigmatic terrain of Russia, the earth itself is bubbling with geothermal energy. It seems like an unlikely pair, doesn't it? But hold on to your lab coats, because we're about to reveal the unexpected link that binds these two marvels together.
While some may think that studying soybeans and geothermal power is about as exciting as watching paint dry in a thermodynamics lecture, our findings will make you question everything you thought you knew about agricultural and energy research. We've combed through mountains of data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration, carefully sieving through the statistics like a pair of enthusiastic science detectives. And let me tell you, the results are hotter than a freshly brewed cup of geothermal steam.
But before we unveil the jaw-dropping numbers, let's take a moment to appreciate the sheer audacity of this endeavor. The soybean may have started its journey innocuously enough, tucked away in the heartland of the United States, but little did it know that its influence would extend as far as the geysers and hot springs of Russia. It's a tale of two vastly different entities colliding in a statistical tango that would make even the most seasoned research aficionado nod in approval.
So, grab a pen and paper (or open a spreadsheet if you're feeling fancy) because we're about to embark on a journey of epic proportions. Our findings are about to turn the world of agricultural and energy research on its head, so fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a rollercoaster ride through the soy-dium-rich fields of Missouri and the sizzling geothermal landscapes of Russia!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

**RESULTS**

The moment we've all been waiting for has arrived! After painstakingly sifting through mounds of data (and consuming copious amounts of coffee), we can finally unleash the remarkable findings of our investigation. Drumroll, please!

Our analysis has unveiled a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9527066 between GMO soybean cultivation in Missouri and geothermal power generation in Russia. That's right, folks, these two seemingly unrelated entities are dancing to the same statistical beat with an r-squared of 0.9076498. And in case you were wondering, the p-value came in at less than 0.01 – now that's what I call a statistically significant romance!

Not convinced yet? Well, feast your eyes on Figure 1! Behold the scatterplot that captures the essence of this mind-boggling relationship. With data points swarming the plot like bees to honey, it's clearer than a freshly polished lab beaker that there's something truly remarkable happening here.

So, what does this all mean? It means that the soybeans of Missouri may be whispering sweet nothings to the geothermal power of Russia through the winds of statistical fate. This correlation is stronger than the gravitational pull between two atoms in a molecule – it's that compelling! The connection between the soy-rich fields of Missouri and the geothermal landscapes of Russia is nothing short of extraordinary, leaving us marveling at the unsuspecting intertwining of agricultural and energy landscapes.

In conclusion, our findings not only shed light on the surprising interplay between seemingly unrelated sectors but also underscore the power of data-driven exploration. The soy-ful world of geothermal power has left us with a sizzling trail of awe, and we can't wait to delve even deeper into the soybean and geothermal power romance. So, buckle up, dear readers, because this soy-dium-rich journey is far from over!

Stay tuned for the rest of our paper, where we'll dissect the implications of this soy-rrific correlation and explore the potential avenues for further research. Science has never been soy entertaining!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and Geothermal power generated in Russia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Toy Soy and Russian Boil: The Correlation Between GMO Soybean Cultivation in Missouri and Geothermal Power in Russia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the unexpectedly interconnected worlds of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri and geothermal power generation in Russia. Despite their seemingly disparate natures, our research reveals a striking correlation between the two, with a coefficient so high it'll make your head spin! Using data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a coefficient of 0.9527066, and with p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. Our findings are nothing short of fascinating and will surely ignite excitement in both the agricultural and energy sectors. So, buckle up and prepare to be amazed by the soy-ful world of geothermal power!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connections between genetically modified soybeans and geothermal power may seem as disparate as a tofu and lava, yet the emerging body of literature suggests otherwise. Smith et al. (2018) shed light on the potential environmental impact of GMO soybean cultivation in their study "Soybeans and Sustainability," while Doe and Jones (2020) explored the economic implications of geothermal energy in their work, "Geothermal Power: Hot or Not?"
However, as we delved deeper into the literature, we stumbled upon some unexpected gems, giving new meaning to the phrase "soy-sational research." Books such as "The Soybean Chronicles: A Tale of Genes and Green" by Tofu McGravy and "Geothermal Goulash: Unearthing Russia's Energy Landscape" by Boris Volcanovich provided a refreshingly unconventional perspective on the subject matter.
Turning from the non-fiction genre to the world of fiction, we stumbled upon "Soybeans of the Galaxy" by Soylo Ren and "Geothermal Grandeur: The Heat Awakens" by George Lavaflame. Although these literary works may not have been peer-reviewed, they certainly sparked our imagination and made us ponder the unexplored intersections between soybeans and geothermal power.
In a somewhat tangential yet oddly relevant manner, we found inspiration from films such as "Soy Story" and "Geothermal Gurus: The Steam Strikes Back." While these cinematic creations may not have featured scholarly discourse, they provided a unique lens through which to view the unexpected connections between the soybean fields of Missouri and the geothermal wonders of Russia.
While the academic rigor of these sources may vary, their impact on our understanding of this peculiar link between GMO soybeans and geothermal power cannot be overstated. As we navigate through this bizarrely entwined landscape, it becomes clear that the soy-ful world of geothermal power is full of surprises, waiting to be uncovered.

[[RESULTS]]
The moment we've all been waiting for has arrived! After painstakingly sifting through mounds of data (and consuming copious amounts of coffee), we can finally unleash the remarkable findings of our investigation. Drumroll, please!
Our analysis has unveiled a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9527066 between GMO soybean cultivation in Missouri and geothermal power generation in Russia. That's right, folks, these two seemingly unrelated entities are dancing to the same statistical beat with an r-squared of 0.9076498. And in case you were wondering, the p-value came in at less than 0.01 – now that's what I call a statistically significant romance!
Not convinced yet? Well, feast your eyes on Figure 1! Behold the scatterplot that captures the essence of this mind-boggling relationship. With data points swarming the plot like bees to honey, it's clearer than a freshly polished lab beaker that there's something truly remarkable happening here.
So, what does this all mean? It means that the soybeans of Missouri may be whispering sweet nothings to the geothermal power of Russia through the winds of statistical fate. This correlation is stronger than the gravitational pull between two atoms in a molecule – it's that compelling! The connection between the soy-rich fields of Missouri and the geothermal landscapes of Russia is nothing short of extraordinary, leaving us marveling at the unsuspecting intertwining of agricultural and energy landscapes.
In conclusion, our findings not only shed light on the surprising interplay between seemingly unrelated sectors but also underscore the power of data-driven exploration. The soy-ful world of geothermal power has left us with a sizzling trail of awe, and we can't wait to delve even deeper into the soybean and geothermal power romance. So, buckle up, dear readers, because this soy-dium-rich journey is far from over!
Stay tuned for the rest of our paper, where we'll dissect the implications of this soy-rrific correlation and explore the potential avenues for further research. Science has never been soy entertaining!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The plot thickens, and I'm not just talking about the soybean stew in Missouri or the steamy geothermal springs in Russia! Our findings have not only unearthed a remarkable correlation between genetically modified soybean cultivation and geothermal power generation but have also propelled us into uncharted comedic territory. As we dissect this soy-rrific correlation, it becomes clear that the winds of statistical fate have been blowing in some unexpected directions.

Our results not only affirm the prior research of Smith et al. (2018) and Doe and Jones (2020) but also pay homage to the stimulating literature and cinematic masterpieces that inspired our journey into the soy-ful world of geothermal power. Yes, "Soy Story" and "Geothermal Gurus: The Steam Strikes Back" may have seemed like lighthearted diversions, but little did we know that they held the key to unlocking the enigmatic connection between soybeans and geothermal power.

Now, let's address the soybean in the room – that colossal correlation coefficient of 0.9527066. This statistical powerhouse not only packs a punch but also serves as a testament to the soy-ful nature of our findings. It's like the perfect fusion of a spicy tofu stir-fry and a piping hot geothermal spring – unexpected, yet oddly satisfying.

With an r-squared of 0.9076498 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our results stand as a beacon of hope for statistical romance enthusiasts everywhere. The soybeans of Missouri and the geothermal power of Russia are locked in a veritable tango of statistical significance, leaving us marveling at the alluring dance of data.

As we gaze upon Figure 1, we can't help but feel a sense of wonder akin to witnessing a scientific marvel. The data points enveloping the scatterplot like a swarm of eager students at a lab assignment represent more than just numerical values – they represent the harmonious symphony of soybeans and geothermal power converging on the grand stage of data visualization.

In essence, our findings open up a Pandora's box of potential research avenues, beckoning us to delve deeper into the perplexing liaison between the soy-ful heartlands of Missouri and the geothermal wonders of Russia. Who knew that statistical serendipity could lead us down such an unexpected path? It's as if statistical significance and agricultural-geothermal romance have collided to create a scientific lovechild more captivating than a Martian soybean pod sprouting in a geothermal field on Io!

So, with our soy-sodium levels at an all-time high, we invite you to join us in this soy-ful exploration, as we venture into the uncharted terrain of further research and the tantalizing potential implications of this sizzling correlation. Science, it seems, has never been soy entertaining!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in soybeans in Missouri and Geothermal power generated in Russia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Toy Soy and Russian Boil: The Correlation Between GMO Soybean Cultivation in Missouri and Geothermal Power in Russia"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the unexpectedly interconnected worlds of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri and geothermal power generation in Russia. Despite their seemingly disparate natures, our research reveals a striking correlation between the two, with a coefficient so high it'll make your head spin! Using data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a coefficient of 0.9527066, and with p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. Our findings are nothing short of fascinating and will surely ignite excitement in both the agricultural and energy sectors. So, buckle up and prepare to be amazed by the soy-ful world of geothermal power!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, brace yourselves for a journey through the incredible realms of genetically modified soybeans and geothermal power. Today, we embark on a quest to unravel the mysterious connection between these two seemingly unrelated entities. As we delve into this research, we promise to deliver a soy-rrific blend of science, statistics, and surprises that will leave you shaking your head in astonishment.
Picture this: a sprawling field of GMO soybeans in the heart of Missouri, silently engaging in a molecular dance of epic proportions. Meanwhile, thousands of miles away, deep within the enigmatic terrain of Russia, the earth itself is bubbling with geothermal energy. It seems like an unlikely pair, doesn't it? But hold on to your lab coats, because we're about to reveal the unexpected link that binds these two marvels together.
While some may think that studying soybeans and geothermal power is about as exciting as watching paint dry in a thermodynamics lecture, our findings will make you question everything you thought you knew about agricultural and energy research. We've combed through mountains of data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration, carefully sieving through the statistics like a pair of enthusiastic science detectives. And let me tell you, the results are hotter than a freshly brewed cup of geothermal steam.
But before we unveil the jaw-dropping numbers, let's take a moment to appreciate the sheer audacity of this endeavor. The soybean may have started its journey innocuously enough, tucked away in the heartland of the United States, but little did it know that its influence would extend as far as the geysers and hot springs of Russia. It's a tale of two vastly different entities colliding in a statistical tango that would make even the most seasoned research aficionado nod in approval.
So, grab a pen and paper (or open a spreadsheet if you're feeling fancy) because we're about to embark on a journey of epic proportions. Our findings are about to turn the world of agricultural and energy research on its head, so fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a rollercoaster ride through the soy-dium-rich fields of Missouri and the sizzling geothermal landscapes of Russia!

[[RESULTS]]
The moment we've all been waiting for has arrived! After painstakingly sifting through mounds of data (and consuming copious amounts of coffee), we can finally unleash the remarkable findings of our investigation. Drumroll, please!
Our analysis has unveiled a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9527066 between GMO soybean cultivation in Missouri and geothermal power generation in Russia. That's right, folks, these two seemingly unrelated entities are dancing to the same statistical beat with an r-squared of 0.9076498. And in case you were wondering, the p-value came in at less than 0.01 – now that's what I call a statistically significant romance!
Not convinced yet? Well, feast your eyes on Figure 1! Behold the scatterplot that captures the essence of this mind-boggling relationship. With data points swarming the plot like bees to honey, it's clearer than a freshly polished lab beaker that there's something truly remarkable happening here.
So, what does this all mean? It means that the soybeans of Missouri may be whispering sweet nothings to the geothermal power of Russia through the winds of statistical fate. This correlation is stronger than the gravitational pull between two atoms in a molecule – it's that compelling! The connection between the soy-rich fields of Missouri and the geothermal landscapes of Russia is nothing short of extraordinary, leaving us marveling at the unsuspecting intertwining of agricultural and energy landscapes.
In conclusion, our findings not only shed light on the surprising interplay between seemingly unrelated sectors but also underscore the power of data-driven exploration. The soy-ful world of geothermal power has left us with a sizzling trail of awe, and we can't wait to delve even deeper into the soybean and geothermal power romance. So, buckle up, dear readers, because this soy-dium-rich journey is far from over!
Stay tuned for the rest of our paper, where we'll dissect the implications of this soy-rrific correlation and explore the potential avenues for further research. Science has never been soy entertaining!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In wrapping up our exhilarating exploration into the surprising correlation between GMO soybean cultivation in Missouri and geothermal power generation in Russia, it's clear that this soy-rrific statistical tango has left us all in a state of awe and wonder. Who would have thought that soybeans and geothermal power could engage in such a sizzling dance of data?

As we bid adieu to this soy-dium-rich adventure, we can't help but marvel at the sheer audacity of statistical fate that brought these two unlikely bedfellows together. It's as if the soybeans of Missouri and the geothermal power of Russia formed a bond stronger than the covalent bonds holding together a water molecule!

Our research has not only uncovered a compelling correlation but has also ignited a fervent curiosity to delve even deeper into this remarkable relationship. Are there underlying biochemical cues that transcend continents and oceans? Are there geographical or climatic factors at play here? The tantalizing possibilities are as endless as the cornucopia of soy-based products on the market.

But as we gaze upon the significant p-value and the captivating scatterplot, we can confidently assert that no more research is needed in this area. The soy-ful world of geothermal power has been uncovered, and we encourage others to embrace the soybean-geothermal power romance with open arms.

So, let's raise a toast to the unassuming soybeans of Missouri and the bubbling geothermal power of Russia, and embrace this soy-rrific statistical revelation with the joy it deserves. Science has never been soy entertaining, and our findings have paved the way for a brave new world of interdisciplinary exploration.

Here's to the soy-dium-rich adventure that has left us all scratching our heads in disbelief and admiration. Until next time, may your statistical correlations be as compelling as this one!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Toy Soy and Russian Boil: The Correlation Between GMO Soybean Cultivation in Missouri and Geothermal Power in Russia. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agro-Geothermal Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Toy Soy and Russian Boil: The Correlation Between GMO Soybean Cultivation in Missouri and Geothermal Power in Russia. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Sustainable Agricultural Innovation and Global Energy Development (CSAIGED)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Toy Soy and Russian Boil: The Correlation Between GMO Soybean Cultivation in Missouri and Geothermal Power in Russia with an abstract of In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the unexpectedly interconnected worlds of genetically modified soybeans in Missouri and geothermal power generation in Russia. Despite their seemingly disparate natures, our research reveals a striking correlation between the two, with a coefficient so high it'll make your head spin! Using data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration, we uncovered a coefficient of 0.9527066, and with p < 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2021. Our findings are nothing short of fascinating and will surely ignite excitement in both the agricultural and energy sectors. So, buckle up and prepare to be amazed by the soy-ful world of geothermal power!

ChatGPT:

GMO soybean cultivation, Missouri, geothermal power, Russia, correlation, USDA data, Energy Information Administration, coefficient, p < 0.01, soybean research, geothermal energy, interconnected systems

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in soybeans in Missouri
Detailed data title: Percent of soybeans planted in Missouri that are genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in soybeans in Missouri

Geothermal power generated in Russia
Detailed data title: Total geothermal power generated in Russia in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Geothermal power generated in Russia

Correlation r = 0.9527066 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9076498 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Geothermal power generated in Russia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in soybeans in Missouri) over the 22 years from 2000 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.31E-12. 0.0000000000083067064054098150
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 8.31E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 120,384,656,830 random variables You don't actually need 120 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.89, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in soybeans in Missouri (GMO soybeans %)62697283878993919289949191909187898791949593
Geothermal power generated in Russia (Billion kWh)0.0580.0910.1560.3240.4030.410.4630.4850.4650.4640.5050.5220.4770.4440.4550.4570.4460.4350.4260.4330.4210.445




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([62,69,72,83,87,89,93,91,92,89,94,91,91,90,91,87,89,87,91,94,95,93,])
array_2 = np.array([0.058,0.091,0.156,0.324,0.403,0.41,0.463,0.485,0.465,0.464,0.505,0.522,0.477,0.444,0.455,0.457,0.446,0.435,0.426,0.433,0.421,0.445,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in soybeans in Missouri"
array_2_name = "Geothermal power generated in Russia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 2595 · Black Variable ID: 837 · Red Variable ID: 23921
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0