Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the GMO corn took a stand against being genetically modified, it inadvertently triggered a domino effect within the digital world. The corn's decision sent shockwaves through the gaming community, leading to a kernel of truth causing a-maize-ing disbelief. Gamers everywhere were just ear-resistibly drawn to the idea of non-GMO corn, and it husked their interest away from Call of Duty. It seems the corn was really good at shelling out a new kind of entertainment, and for gamers, it was game over for Call of Duty as they popped off to ponder the cobsequences of GMOs. It was a-maize-ing, but in this husk, the truth kernel-y found a way to cob-fuse and plant a-maize-ing thoughts in the minds of gamers. The non-GMO corn, with its ear-resistible influence, really ear-ned its status as a game changer in the digital world. Who knew that a-maize-ing corn in Ohio could husk the entire gaming industry and corn-er the market on entertainment?Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] A field in Ohio stretches out beneath a clear blue sky, and towering stalks of genetically modified corn create a striking pattern against the horizon. The vibrant green leaves of the corn shimmer in the sunlight as they reach for the sky. Among the rows of corn, small groups of people are gathered, their faces illuminated by the screens of their smartphones. The glow reflects in their eyes as they are engrossed in playing "Call of Duty." The sound of gunfire from the game fills the air, blending with the gentle rustling of the leaves. This unusual scene depicts the connection between advanced agriculture and modern technology, where the fascination with shooting games intertwines with the remarkable crop. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'call of duty'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art A photo-realistic image Cute cartoon Realistic Scalar art
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'call of duty', in the following situation: The GMO corn was so good at shooting up to grow tall that it sparked a fervent interest in shooting games like Call of Duty. As the corn became more genetically modified, it also modified the gaming preferences of the people around it. The kernels of truth in this correlation show that the real game changer was the corn itself, planting the seeds for a-maize-ing virtual battles. Whether it's the stalky competition or the ear-resistible urge to play, one thing's for sure - this correlation is definitely a-MAIZE-ing.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a field in Ohio, towering stalks of genetically modified corn reach for the sky under the bright sun. Among the rows of corn, groups of people are gathered around their smartphones, engrossed in playing "Call of Duty." The sound of gunfire from the game fills the air, blending with the rustling leaves of the remarkable corn. The connection between the advanced crop and the fascination with shooting games is evident in this unusual yet captivating scene.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In a field in Ohio, towering stalks of genetically modified corn reach for the sky under the bright sun. Among the rows of corn, groups of people are gathered around their smartphones, engrossed in playing "Call of Duty." The sound of gunfire from the game fills the air, blending with the rustling leaves of the remarkable corn. The connection between the advanced crop and the fascination with shooting games is evident in this unusual yet captivating scene. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] A field in Ohio stretches out beneath a clear blue sky, and towering stalks of genetically modified corn create a striking pattern against the horizon. The vibrant green leaves of the corn shimmer in the sunlight as they reach for the sky. Among the rows of corn, small groups of people are gathered, their faces illuminated by the screens of their smartphones. The glow reflects in their eyes as they are engrossed in playing "Call of Duty." The sound of gunfire from the game fills the air, blending with the gentle rustling of the leaves. This unusual scene depicts the connection between advanced agriculture and modern technology, where the fascination with shooting games intertwines with the remarkable crop.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in Ohio caused call of duty (Google searches for 'call of duty') to decrease.
AI academic paper
Stalk and Shoot: The Kernel of Connection Between GMO Corn and Gaming Searches The Journal of Genetically Modified Organisms and Digital Engagement Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'call of duty'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Include a pun in the title.
Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8528520 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk and Shoot: The Kernel of Connection Between GMO Corn and Gaming Searches"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we kernel in on the relationship between the usage of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for the popular video game "Call of Duty". Our research sprouted from the curiosity of whether there is any corn-nection between agricultural practices and gaming preferences. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we uncovered a corn-fed correlation coefficient of 0.8528520 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.
It seems that corn grown with GMO technology may have a kernel influence on the gaming habits of individuals, with a cob-nected increase in searches for "Call of Duty" corresponding to an expansion in the use of GMO corn. Our findings provide a-maize-ing insight into the unexpected intersections between agriculture and online gaming preferences. As the saying goes, "You can't shuck the tassel without getting a little corny!"
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'call of duty'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk and Shoot: The Kernel of Connection Between GMO Corn and Gaming Searches"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we kernel in on the relationship between the usage of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for the popular video game "Call of Duty". Our research sprouted from the curiosity of whether there is any corn-nection between agricultural practices and gaming preferences. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we uncovered a corn-fed correlation coefficient of 0.8528520 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.
It seems that corn grown with GMO technology may have a kernel influence on the gaming habits of individuals, with a cob-nected increase in searches for "Call of Duty" corresponding to an expansion in the use of GMO corn. Our findings provide a-maize-ing insight into the unexpected intersections between agriculture and online gaming preferences. As the saying goes, "You can't shuck the tassel without getting a little corny!"
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
GMO corn has been the subject of much debate and speculation in recent years, with concerns ranging from its impact on the environment to its potential health effects. Meanwhile, online gaming has become an integral part of modern leisure activities, with "Call of Duty" standing out as a perennial favorite in the gaming community. We set out on a mission to peel back the layers of this cornundrum and uncover the cob-nection between GMO corn and gamers' virtual battlegrounds.
As researchers, we are accustomed to sowing the seeds of knowledge and reaping the data harvest, but we never anticipated stumbling upon such a corn-y correlation. It's not every day that one finds themselves knee-deep in data about crops and game controllers. You might say it was an ear-resistible opportunity for a-maize-ing discoveries.
The chronicles of GMO corn extend far beyond biological research and the agricultural industry. They now entwine themselves with the digital realm of video games, creating a peculiar crossbreed of research interests. The convergence of these two seemingly unrelated fields marks the genesis of our pursuit to reveal the kernel of truth lurking beneath the surface.
The journey to uncover this kernel of correlation has been nothing short of corn-velous. It has involved traversing through Google searches, USDA reports, and statistical analyses to discern patterns amidst the stalks of data. Our pursuit has been anything but corn-vetional, but we are poppin' with excitement to share our findings and unshuck the mystery surrounding GMO corn and virtual warfare.
Stay tuned for the kernel-ations and cob-nclusions of this unconventional research rendezvous. After all, who would have thought that GMO corn and "Call of Duty" would ever share the same ear of interest? It’s almost a-maize-ing how research can lead us down unexpected paths, isn't it?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'call of duty'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk and Shoot: The Kernel of Connection Between GMO Corn and Gaming Searches"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we kernel in on the relationship between the usage of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for the popular video game "Call of Duty". Our research sprouted from the curiosity of whether there is any corn-nection between agricultural practices and gaming preferences. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we uncovered a corn-fed correlation coefficient of 0.8528520 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.
It seems that corn grown with GMO technology may have a kernel influence on the gaming habits of individuals, with a cob-nected increase in searches for "Call of Duty" corresponding to an expansion in the use of GMO corn. Our findings provide a-maize-ing insight into the unexpected intersections between agriculture and online gaming preferences. As the saying goes, "You can't shuck the tassel without getting a little corny!"
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
GMO corn has been the subject of much debate and speculation in recent years, with concerns ranging from its impact on the environment to its potential health effects. Meanwhile, online gaming has become an integral part of modern leisure activities, with "Call of Duty" standing out as a perennial favorite in the gaming community. We set out on a mission to peel back the layers of this cornundrum and uncover the cob-nection between GMO corn and gamers' virtual battlegrounds.
As researchers, we are accustomed to sowing the seeds of knowledge and reaping the data harvest, but we never anticipated stumbling upon such a corn-y correlation. It's not every day that one finds themselves knee-deep in data about crops and game controllers. You might say it was an ear-resistible opportunity for a-maize-ing discoveries.
The chronicles of GMO corn extend far beyond biological research and the agricultural industry. They now entwine themselves with the digital realm of video games, creating a peculiar crossbreed of research interests. The convergence of these two seemingly unrelated fields marks the genesis of our pursuit to reveal the kernel of truth lurking beneath the surface.
The journey to uncover this kernel of correlation has been nothing short of corn-velous. It has involved traversing through Google searches, USDA reports, and statistical analyses to discern patterns amidst the stalks of data. Our pursuit has been anything but corn-vetional, but we are poppin' with excitement to share our findings and unshuck the mystery surrounding GMO corn and virtual warfare.
Stay tuned for the kernel-ations and cob-nclusions of this unconventional research rendezvous. After all, who would have thought that GMO corn and "Call of Duty" would ever share the same ear of interest? It’s almost a-maize-ing how research can lead us down unexpected paths, isn't it?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Influence of Agricultural Practices on Online Search Behavior," Smith et al. delved into the impact of farming techniques on internet search patterns, noting correlations between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and online gaming queries. The study shed light on the surprising relationship between agricultural practices and virtual pastimes, leading the way for further inquiry into this uncharted territory. As the researchers peel back the layers of data, they discover a-maize-ing corn-nections that leave them ear-resistibly surprised.
Doe's "Corn and Culture: From Farm Fields to Gaming Fields" revealed fascinating insights into the cultural and societal aspects of corn production and its unsuspected links to gaming preferences. The study highlighted the importance of considering the agricultural landscape as a potential influencer on digital leisure activities. The authors found themselves stalked by the unexpected correlations, leading them to pop up with corny jokes at every turn.
Jones' "The Economics of Corn and Clans" explored the economic ramifications of corn production and its unexpected ties to online gaming communities. The study unearthed statistical evidence of a correlational cob-nundrum that left the researchers shell-shocked at the unlikely intersection of these seemingly disparate domains. It's safe to say that the researchers couldn't contain their a-maize-ment at the findings.
Moving beyond scholarly articles and into the realm of popular non-fiction literature, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan provided a comprehensive exploration of modern agricultural practices, including the pervasive influence of GMOs on the food industry. "Fast Food Nation" by Eric Schlosser also offered valuable insights into the intertwined nature of agricultural production and consumer behavior, albeit in a less corn-plicated context.
Shifting to the realm of fiction, "The Corn Identity" by Robert Ludlum veered into the world of espionage and action, entwining the enigma of genetically modified corn with high-stakes intrigue. In a similar vein, "Corn of the Dead" by George Romero explored a dystopian narrative where GMO corn takes center stage as both sustenance and source of peril in a post-apocalyptic setting.
In a nod to alternative sources of insight, the researchers also perused an array of CVS receipts, exploring the ink-stained pathways of everyday purchases in search of any kernel of wisdom that might shed light on the unexpected co-maize-ifications of GMO corn and virtual warfare. While the findings were as scattered as corn kernels at a summer picnic, the experience was certainly a-maize-ing in its own right.
As the literature review comes to a close, it's clear that the intersection of GMO corn and gaming searches has led to some ear-responsible puns and unexpected connections. This unlikely corn-nection continues to puzzle and delight researchers, proving that sometimes, the most corn-y of inquiries can lead to kernel insights.
After all, when it comes to the relationship between corn and gaming, one can't help but ask, "What do you call a group of genetically modified corn playing 'Call of Duty' together? A kernel of duty!"
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'call of duty'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk and Shoot: The Kernel of Connection Between GMO Corn and Gaming Searches"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we kernel in on the relationship between the usage of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for the popular video game "Call of Duty". Our research sprouted from the curiosity of whether there is any corn-nection between agricultural practices and gaming preferences. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we uncovered a corn-fed correlation coefficient of 0.8528520 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.
It seems that corn grown with GMO technology may have a kernel influence on the gaming habits of individuals, with a cob-nected increase in searches for "Call of Duty" corresponding to an expansion in the use of GMO corn. Our findings provide a-maize-ing insight into the unexpected intersections between agriculture and online gaming preferences. As the saying goes, "You can't shuck the tassel without getting a little corny!"
[[INTRODUCTION]]
GMO corn has been the subject of much debate and speculation in recent years, with concerns ranging from its impact on the environment to its potential health effects. Meanwhile, online gaming has become an integral part of modern leisure activities, with "Call of Duty" standing out as a perennial favorite in the gaming community. We set out on a mission to peel back the layers of this cornundrum and uncover the cob-nection between GMO corn and gamers' virtual battlegrounds.
As researchers, we are accustomed to sowing the seeds of knowledge and reaping the data harvest, but we never anticipated stumbling upon such a corn-y correlation. It's not every day that one finds themselves knee-deep in data about crops and game controllers. You might say it was an ear-resistible opportunity for a-maize-ing discoveries.
The chronicles of GMO corn extend far beyond biological research and the agricultural industry. They now entwine themselves with the digital realm of video games, creating a peculiar crossbreed of research interests. The convergence of these two seemingly unrelated fields marks the genesis of our pursuit to reveal the kernel of truth lurking beneath the surface.
The journey to uncover this kernel of correlation has been nothing short of corn-velous. It has involved traversing through Google searches, USDA reports, and statistical analyses to discern patterns amidst the stalks of data. Our pursuit has been anything but corn-vetional, but we are poppin' with excitement to share our findings and unshuck the mystery surrounding GMO corn and virtual warfare.
Stay tuned for the kernel-ations and cob-nclusions of this unconventional research rendezvous. After all, who would have thought that GMO corn and "Call of Duty" would ever share the same ear of interest? It’s almost a-maize-ing how research can lead us down unexpected paths, isn't it?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
Ah, my fellow scholars, let's get right down to the kernel of the matter – the methodology behind our a-maize-ing journey into the cob-nection between GMO corn in Ohio and Google searches for 'Call of Duty'. Our research team wasn't just shooting in the dark with this one; we carefully crafted our methods to husk out the truth from the stalks of data available to us.
First things first, we gathered our data from the bountiful fields of the internet, harvesting information from the USDA and Google Trends. It was like a virtual cornucopia of data, ripe for the picking. And let me tell you, sorting through all that data was a-maize-ing.
To establish the scope of our study, we looked at data from 2004 to 2023 – a corn-siderable timeframe, if I do say so myself. We wanted to ensure that we caught the evolution of GMO corn usage and the ebb and flow of 'Call of Duty' interest over the years. It's amazing how much things can change in the span of almost two decades, don't you think? It's like a corn-mological clock ticking away.
Now, to truly husk out the juicy correlations, we employed sophisticated statistical analyses. We utilized regression models to cob-ble together the relationship between the usage of GMO corn and the frequency of 'Call of Duty' searches. The data was like maize to the mill, and we crunched those numbers with the precision of a combine harvester.
We ended up with a corn-fed correlation coefficient of 0.8528520 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. It's like we struck gold in the cornfields! Who knew that GMO corn and gaming searches would be so ripe for correlation?
Our methods may have been as convoluted as a corn maze, but we've emerged triumphant with findings that could pop the kernels of convention. Stay tuned for the cob-nclusions, my colleagues, for the best is yet to come!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'call of duty'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .
For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8528520, r-squared of 0.7273566, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk and Shoot: The Kernel of Connection Between GMO Corn and Gaming Searches"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we kernel in on the relationship between the usage of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for the popular video game "Call of Duty". Our research sprouted from the curiosity of whether there is any corn-nection between agricultural practices and gaming preferences. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we uncovered a corn-fed correlation coefficient of 0.8528520 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.
It seems that corn grown with GMO technology may have a kernel influence on the gaming habits of individuals, with a cob-nected increase in searches for "Call of Duty" corresponding to an expansion in the use of GMO corn. Our findings provide a-maize-ing insight into the unexpected intersections between agriculture and online gaming preferences. As the saying goes, "You can't shuck the tassel without getting a little corny!"
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
GMO corn has been the subject of much debate and speculation in recent years, with concerns ranging from its impact on the environment to its potential health effects. Meanwhile, online gaming has become an integral part of modern leisure activities, with "Call of Duty" standing out as a perennial favorite in the gaming community. We set out on a mission to peel back the layers of this cornundrum and uncover the cob-nection between GMO corn and gamers' virtual battlegrounds.
As researchers, we are accustomed to sowing the seeds of knowledge and reaping the data harvest, but we never anticipated stumbling upon such a corn-y correlation. It's not every day that one finds themselves knee-deep in data about crops and game controllers. You might say it was an ear-resistible opportunity for a-maize-ing discoveries.
The chronicles of GMO corn extend far beyond biological research and the agricultural industry. They now entwine themselves with the digital realm of video games, creating a peculiar crossbreed of research interests. The convergence of these two seemingly unrelated fields marks the genesis of our pursuit to reveal the kernel of truth lurking beneath the surface.
The journey to uncover this kernel of correlation has been nothing short of corn-velous. It has involved traversing through Google searches, USDA reports, and statistical analyses to discern patterns amidst the stalks of data. Our pursuit has been anything but corn-vetional, but we are poppin' with excitement to share our findings and unshuck the mystery surrounding GMO corn and virtual warfare.
Stay tuned for the kernel-ations and cob-nclusions of this unconventional research rendezvous. After all, who would have thought that GMO corn and "Call of Duty" would ever share the same ear of interest? It’s almost a-maize-ing how research can lead us down unexpected paths, isn't it?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8528520, with an r-squared value of 0.7273566, denoting a strong positive correlation between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for "Call of Duty". The p-value of less than 0.01 confirmed the statistical significance of this correlation, leaving us in no doubt about the cob-nected relationship between these variables.
In layman's terms, we've uncovered a popcorn-popping correlation between GMO corn and virtual warfare. One might say it's the cob-nection we never knew we kernel-d. The saying, "the stalk don't lie," rings true in our findings, much like corn in the fields of Ohio.
The figure (Fig. 1)—a scatterplot showcasing the robust correlation between the utilization of GMO corn and the frequency of "Call of Duty" searches—paints a clear picture of the relationship we've unraveled. It's safe to say that our results aren't just corn-firming a correlation but also shelling out a-maize-ing insights into the unexpected overlap between agriculture and online gaming habits. Who knew genetically modified corn could have such ear-resistible effects on virtual battlegrounds?
Our findings serve as a reminder that even in the world of research, one must remain open to the corn-cept of unexpected relationships. After all, you never know what kind of kernels of wisdom might pop up in your data!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'call of duty'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk and Shoot: The Kernel of Connection Between GMO Corn and Gaming Searches"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we kernel in on the relationship between the usage of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for the popular video game "Call of Duty". Our research sprouted from the curiosity of whether there is any corn-nection between agricultural practices and gaming preferences. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we uncovered a corn-fed correlation coefficient of 0.8528520 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.
It seems that corn grown with GMO technology may have a kernel influence on the gaming habits of individuals, with a cob-nected increase in searches for "Call of Duty" corresponding to an expansion in the use of GMO corn. Our findings provide a-maize-ing insight into the unexpected intersections between agriculture and online gaming preferences. As the saying goes, "You can't shuck the tassel without getting a little corny!"
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Influence of Agricultural Practices on Online Search Behavior," Smith et al. delved into the impact of farming techniques on internet search patterns, noting correlations between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and online gaming queries. The study shed light on the surprising relationship between agricultural practices and virtual pastimes, leading the way for further inquiry into this uncharted territory. As the researchers peel back the layers of data, they discover a-maize-ing corn-nections that leave them ear-resistibly surprised.
Doe's "Corn and Culture: From Farm Fields to Gaming Fields" revealed fascinating insights into the cultural and societal aspects of corn production and its unsuspected links to gaming preferences. The study highlighted the importance of considering the agricultural landscape as a potential influencer on digital leisure activities. The authors found themselves stalked by the unexpected correlations, leading them to pop up with corny jokes at every turn.
Jones' "The Economics of Corn and Clans" explored the economic ramifications of corn production and its unexpected ties to online gaming communities. The study unearthed statistical evidence of a correlational cob-nundrum that left the researchers shell-shocked at the unlikely intersection of these seemingly disparate domains. It's safe to say that the researchers couldn't contain their a-maize-ment at the findings.
Moving beyond scholarly articles and into the realm of popular non-fiction literature, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan provided a comprehensive exploration of modern agricultural practices, including the pervasive influence of GMOs on the food industry. "Fast Food Nation" by Eric Schlosser also offered valuable insights into the intertwined nature of agricultural production and consumer behavior, albeit in a less corn-plicated context.
Shifting to the realm of fiction, "The Corn Identity" by Robert Ludlum veered into the world of espionage and action, entwining the enigma of genetically modified corn with high-stakes intrigue. In a similar vein, "Corn of the Dead" by George Romero explored a dystopian narrative where GMO corn takes center stage as both sustenance and source of peril in a post-apocalyptic setting.
In a nod to alternative sources of insight, the researchers also perused an array of CVS receipts, exploring the ink-stained pathways of everyday purchases in search of any kernel of wisdom that might shed light on the unexpected co-maize-ifications of GMO corn and virtual warfare. While the findings were as scattered as corn kernels at a summer picnic, the experience was certainly a-maize-ing in its own right.
As the literature review comes to a close, it's clear that the intersection of GMO corn and gaming searches has led to some ear-responsible puns and unexpected connections. This unlikely corn-nection continues to puzzle and delight researchers, proving that sometimes, the most corn-y of inquiries can lead to kernel insights.
After all, when it comes to the relationship between corn and gaming, one can't help but ask, "What do you call a group of genetically modified corn playing 'Call of Duty' together? A kernel of duty!"
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8528520, with an r-squared value of 0.7273566, denoting a strong positive correlation between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for "Call of Duty". The p-value of less than 0.01 confirmed the statistical significance of this correlation, leaving us in no doubt about the cob-nected relationship between these variables.
In layman's terms, we've uncovered a popcorn-popping correlation between GMO corn and virtual warfare. One might say it's the cob-nection we never knew we kernel-d. The saying, "the stalk don't lie," rings true in our findings, much like corn in the fields of Ohio.
The figure (Fig. 1)—a scatterplot showcasing the robust correlation between the utilization of GMO corn and the frequency of "Call of Duty" searches—paints a clear picture of the relationship we've unraveled. It's safe to say that our results aren't just corn-firming a correlation but also shelling out a-maize-ing insights into the unexpected overlap between agriculture and online gaming habits. Who knew genetically modified corn could have such ear-resistible effects on virtual battlegrounds?
Our findings serve as a reminder that even in the world of research, one must remain open to the corn-cept of unexpected relationships. After all, you never know what kind of kernels of wisdom might pop up in your data!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our study has undoubtedly ruffled some feathers in the academic community, as we've unveiled a kernel of truth in the correlation between GMO corn usage in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for "Call of Duty". It seems the stakes are high, and our findings are no laughing matter – except for when they are! The correlation coefficient of 0.8528520 supports the literature's hint at a corn-nection between agricultural practices and gaming preferences. If only we had known sooner that the path to victory in gaming might involve kernels instead of keyboards!
Smith et al.'s work provided the initial sprout of curiosity into this uncharted territory, and our findings have now sprouted into a-maize-ing insights that confirm and expand upon their ear-responsible suspicions. The statistically significant p-value further verifies that this corn-nection is not just a fluke, leaving us with no cobworth questioning the robustness of our results. It's clear that the virtual battlegrounds echo the rhythm of cornfields – who knew that the corn stalks have a duty to influence gaming habits?
Our findings prompt us to ponder, "What do you call a genetically modified corn that dominates 'Call of Duty'? A kernel of duty!" The figure showcasing the correlation resembles a beautifully arranged corn cob, reminding us that even in the realm of research, there's corn-stant potential for unexpected relationships – just like when one stumbles upon a pop-up corn maze in the middle of a data analysis. As always, the stalk don't lie!
In conclusion, our study has peeled back the layers of data to reveal a-maize-ing insights, leaving us humbled by the wonder of the scientific world. It's clear that the games people play are influenced by the fields where corn holds court, and the tassel is indeed intertwined with the world of virtual entertainment. There's no cobfusion in admitting that the unexpected co-maize-ifications of GMO corn and gaming searches have left us popping with excitement for what future research might unearth. After all, when it comes to the intersection of corn and gaming, one can't help but ask, "Have we cracked the kernel? Or must we keep popping until the corn-nection fully unfolds?"
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'call of duty'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk and Shoot: The Kernel of Connection Between GMO Corn and Gaming Searches"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we kernel in on the relationship between the usage of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for the popular video game "Call of Duty". Our research sprouted from the curiosity of whether there is any corn-nection between agricultural practices and gaming preferences. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we uncovered a corn-fed correlation coefficient of 0.8528520 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.
It seems that corn grown with GMO technology may have a kernel influence on the gaming habits of individuals, with a cob-nected increase in searches for "Call of Duty" corresponding to an expansion in the use of GMO corn. Our findings provide a-maize-ing insight into the unexpected intersections between agriculture and online gaming preferences. As the saying goes, "You can't shuck the tassel without getting a little corny!"
[[INTRDUCTION]]
GMO corn has been the subject of much debate and speculation in recent years, with concerns ranging from its impact on the environment to its potential health effects. Meanwhile, online gaming has become an integral part of modern leisure activities, with "Call of Duty" standing out as a perennial favorite in the gaming community. We set out on a mission to peel back the layers of this cornundrum and uncover the cob-nection between GMO corn and gamers' virtual battlegrounds.
As researchers, we are accustomed to sowing the seeds of knowledge and reaping the data harvest, but we never anticipated stumbling upon such a corn-y correlation. It's not every day that one finds themselves knee-deep in data about crops and game controllers. You might say it was an ear-resistible opportunity for a-maize-ing discoveries.
The chronicles of GMO corn extend far beyond biological research and the agricultural industry. They now entwine themselves with the digital realm of video games, creating a peculiar crossbreed of research interests. The convergence of these two seemingly unrelated fields marks the genesis of our pursuit to reveal the kernel of truth lurking beneath the surface.
The journey to uncover this kernel of correlation has been nothing short of corn-velous. It has involved traversing through Google searches, USDA reports, and statistical analyses to discern patterns amidst the stalks of data. Our pursuit has been anything but corn-vetional, but we are poppin' with excitement to share our findings and unshuck the mystery surrounding GMO corn and virtual warfare.
Stay tuned for the kernel-ations and cob-nclusions of this unconventional research rendezvous. After all, who would have thought that GMO corn and "Call of Duty" would ever share the same ear of interest? It’s almost a-maize-ing how research can lead us down unexpected paths, isn't it?
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8528520, with an r-squared value of 0.7273566, denoting a strong positive correlation between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for "Call of Duty". The p-value of less than 0.01 confirmed the statistical significance of this correlation, leaving us in no doubt about the cob-nected relationship between these variables.
In layman's terms, we've uncovered a popcorn-popping correlation between GMO corn and virtual warfare. One might say it's the cob-nection we never knew we kernel-d. The saying, "the stalk don't lie," rings true in our findings, much like corn in the fields of Ohio.
The figure (Fig. 1)—a scatterplot showcasing the robust correlation between the utilization of GMO corn and the frequency of "Call of Duty" searches—paints a clear picture of the relationship we've unraveled. It's safe to say that our results aren't just corn-firming a correlation but also shelling out a-maize-ing insights into the unexpected overlap between agriculture and online gaming habits. Who knew genetically modified corn could have such ear-resistible effects on virtual battlegrounds?
Our findings serve as a reminder that even in the world of research, one must remain open to the corn-cept of unexpected relationships. After all, you never know what kind of kernels of wisdom might pop up in your data!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has not only husked the mysteries surrounding the influence of GMO corn on online gaming but has also brushed cob with new avenues of statistical research. Our results highlight a compelling correlation between the cultivation of GMO corn in Ohio and the surge in "Call of Duty" searches, suggesting that perhaps gamers are not just driven by virtual strategies but also by the corn-venience of agricultural practices. It seems that in the game of corn and war, the stakes are high, and the crops are even higher!
With our findings, we do not want to corn-fuse our readers, but rather plant the idea that there may be unforeseen connections between seemingly unrelated variables. As researchers delving into uncharted territory, it's both ear-responsible and husk-worthy to acknowledge how our understanding of statistical relationships can grow from unorthodox pairings. You could say we've truly reaped what we sow!
The question of whether more research in this area is warranted remains a-maize-ingly clear: it's time to pop the cork on further investigations. We believe this study sheds light on the necessity for continued exploration into unconventional correlations, but we are also confident that our results provide the cob-clusive evidence that no more research is needed on the corn-nection between GMO corn and "Call of Duty" searches. After all, we've already cultivated a-maize-ing knowledge in this field!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Stalk and Shoot: The Kernel of Connection Between GMO Corn and Gaming Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Genetically Modified Organisms and Digital Engagement
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Stalk and Shoot: The Kernel of Connection Between GMO Corn and Gaming Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Association for Crop Innovation and Technological Advancement (ACITA)
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Stalk and Shoot: The Kernel of Connection Between GMO Corn and Gaming Searches with an abstract of In this paper, we kernel in on the relationship between the usage of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for the popular video game "Call of Duty". Our research sprouted from the curiosity of whether there is any corn-nection between agricultural practices and gaming preferences. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we uncovered a corn-fed correlation coefficient of 0.8528520 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2023.
It seems that corn grown with GMO technology may have a kernel influence on the gaming habits of individuals, with a cob-nected increase in searches for "Call of Duty" corresponding to an expansion in the use of GMO corn. Our findings provide a-maize-ing insight into the unexpected intersections between agriculture and online gaming preferences. As the saying goes, "You can't shuck the tassel without getting a little corny!
ChatGPT:
GMO corn, gaming preferences, correlation, interaction, agriculture, technology, Google searches, "Call of Duty", USDA data, statistical significance, correlation coefficient, GMO influence, online gaming, agricultural practices, gaming habits, unexpected intersections
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
GMO use in corn grown in OhioDetailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Ohio that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Ohio
Google searches for 'call of duty'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'call of duty' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
See what else correlates with Google searches for 'call of duty'
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.7273566 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 72.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'call of duty') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Ohio) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.8E-6. 0.0000017780073382236219000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 0.00018% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 562,427 random variables You don't actually need 562 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.66, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
GMO use in corn grown in Ohio (GMO corn %) | 8 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 13 | 24 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 |
Google searches for 'call of duty' (Rel. search volume) | 25.3333 | 22.5 | 20.3333 | 25.1667 | 38.5 | 40.4167 | 44.1667 | 40.5 | 29.5833 | 28.3333 | 24.4167 | 20.4167 | 16.5833 | 15.25 | 10.8333 | 14.75 | 22.1667 | 14.1667 | 14.25 | 12 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([8,9,8,9,12,15,13,24,13,6,3,3,2,2,2,2,3,5,1,2,])
array_2 = np.array([25.3333,22.5,20.3333,25.1667,38.5,40.4167,44.1667,40.5,29.5833,28.3333,24.4167,20.4167,16.5833,15.25,10.8333,14.75,22.1667,14.1667,14.25,12,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Ohio"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'call of duty'"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only GMO use in corn grown in Ohio
- Line chart for only Google searches for 'call of duty'
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Stalk and Shoot: The Kernel of Connection Between GMO Corn and Gaming Searches
I'm grateful for your review!
Correlation ID: 2580 · Black Variable ID: 719 · Red Variable ID: 1467