about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,576 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the second variable is xkcd comics published about hobbies.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the college sociology teachers in Tennessee dwindled, there were fewer experts to analyze the intricate social dynamics of various hobbies. This led to a nationwide shortage of hobby-related societal insights, stifling the creative flow for xkcd comics in this niche. With no one to teach about the sociology of hobbies, the xkcd creator found themselves adrift in a sea of leisure activities, unable to craft the usual hilarious and relatable content.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image of an abandoned classroom set in a futuristic Tennessee college. The desks should be empty, surrounded by advanced technology and subtle holographic displays. An ethereal glow from the ceiling illuminates the fading "xkcd" comics about hobbies on the chalkboard, emphasizing the significance of sociological observations. The absence of teachers is evident, but the remaining remnants denote a once vibrant study of hobbyist culture in a technologically advanced world. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and xkcd comics published about hobbies. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Celtic art Concept art Futuristic Steampunk Pop art
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and xkcd comics published about hobbies, in the following situation: As the number of sociology teachers in Tennessee dwindled, so did the urge to "study" quirky hobbies. With fewer professors "sociating" with students, there was a "decrease in the "ethnograph" of hobbyist culture. As a result, there were "fewer theories to "parse" through, leading to a "dramatic" drop in xkcd comics about hobbies. It seems like the "demise" of sociology in Tennessee had a "domino effect", ultimately impacting the "scroll of hobbies" in the xkcd universe. It's a "sociologically significant" correlation, but perhaps it's just a "reduction in comic "stripped-down" to the bare essentials!". Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In an empty classroom at a Tennessee college, the desks sat deserted as the number of sociology teachers dwindled. On the chalkboard, a few fading "xkcd" comics about hobbies were the only remnants of the once lively "ethnograph" of hobbyist culture. The absence of professors to "parse" through theories led to a dramatic drop in the "scroll of hobbies" in the xkcd universe - a sociologically significant correlation.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: In an empty classroom at a Tennessee college, the desks sat deserted as the number of sociology teachers dwindled. On the chalkboard, a few fading "xkcd" comics about hobbies were the only remnants of the once lively "ethnograph" of hobbyist culture. The absence of professors to "parse" through theories led to a dramatic drop in the "scroll of hobbies" in the xkcd universe - a sociologically significant correlation. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image of an abandoned classroom set in a futuristic Tennessee college. The desks should be empty, surrounded by advanced technology and subtle holographic displays. An ethereal glow from the ceiling illuminates the fading "xkcd" comics about hobbies on the chalkboard, emphasizing the significance of sociological observations. The absence of teachers is evident, but the remaining remnants denote a once vibrant study of hobbyist culture in a technologically advanced world.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee caused xkcd comics published about hobbies to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Social Science of Comics: An Analysis of the Correlation between College Sociology Teachers in Tennessee and xkcd Comics on Hobbies

Journal of Humor and Social Sciences

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and xkcd comics published about hobbies. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and AI analysis of xkcd comics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6995228 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Social Science of Comics: An Analysis of the Correlation between College Sociology Teachers in Tennessee and xkcd Comics on Hobbies"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a quantitative investigation into the intriguing relationship between the demographic distribution of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the representation of hobbies in xkcd comics. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and artificial intelligence analysis of xkcd comics published between 2007 and 2021, we have computed a correlation coefficient of 0.6995228 (p < 0.01) that warrants further exploration. Our findings not only shed light on the potential influence of academic specialization on the portrayal of leisure activities, but also provide fodder for some lighthearted musings at the intersection of academia and pop culture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and xkcd comics published about hobbies. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Social Science of Comics: An Analysis of the Correlation between College Sociology Teachers in Tennessee and xkcd Comics on Hobbies"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a quantitative investigation into the intriguing relationship between the demographic distribution of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the representation of hobbies in xkcd comics. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and artificial intelligence analysis of xkcd comics published between 2007 and 2021, we have computed a correlation coefficient of 0.6995228 (p < 0.01) that warrants further exploration. Our findings not only shed light on the potential influence of academic specialization on the portrayal of leisure activities, but also provide fodder for some lighthearted musings at the intersection of academia and pop culture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

In the vast and wacky world of pop culture, the realm of webcomics holds a special place. One particular webcomic, xkcd, has captivated audiences with its unique blend of humor, science, and stick-figure artwork. While many have marveled at the wit and wisdom embedded within the panels of xkcd, few have ventured into the uncharted territory of unraveling the mysterious connections between the comic's content and the demographic landscape of academia.

Intriguingly, the present study aims to explore the often-overlooked correlation between the number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the portrayal of hobbies in xkcd comics. Yes, you read that right – we are delving into the realm of academic demographics and webcomic musings, a juncture where data analysis meets doodles, and statistical significance dances with stick figures.

Although this unconventional pairing may raise more than a few eyebrows, it beckons us to ponder: Could the distribution of sociology pedagogues in the Volunteer State subtly sway the topics of pastimes that grace the pixels of xkcd? Or are we merely chasing shadows in the land of correlations and quips?

With an ever-curious spirit and an appreciation for the offbeat, we embark on this scholarly escapade to shed light on this quizzical conundrum and to perhaps unearth a few chuckles along the way. So, don your academic spectacles and buckle up for a journey that promises to be equal parts thought-provoking and light-hearted. Together, we shall navigate the intersection of sociological demographics and webcomic whimsy, seeking to unveil the unanticipated patterns that emerge when academia and pop culture collide.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and xkcd comics published about hobbies. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Social Science of Comics: An Analysis of the Correlation between College Sociology Teachers in Tennessee and xkcd Comics on Hobbies"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a quantitative investigation into the intriguing relationship between the demographic distribution of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the representation of hobbies in xkcd comics. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and artificial intelligence analysis of xkcd comics published between 2007 and 2021, we have computed a correlation coefficient of 0.6995228 (p < 0.01) that warrants further exploration. Our findings not only shed light on the potential influence of academic specialization on the portrayal of leisure activities, but also provide fodder for some lighthearted musings at the intersection of academia and pop culture.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the vast and wacky world of pop culture, the realm of webcomics holds a special place. One particular webcomic, xkcd, has captivated audiences with its unique blend of humor, science, and stick-figure artwork. While many have marveled at the wit and wisdom embedded within the panels of xkcd, few have ventured into the uncharted territory of unraveling the mysterious connections between the comic's content and the demographic landscape of academia.
Intriguingly, the present study aims to explore the often-overlooked correlation between the number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the portrayal of hobbies in xkcd comics. Yes, you read that right – we are delving into the realm of academic demographics and webcomic musings, a juncture where data analysis meets doodles, and statistical significance dances with stick figures.
Although this unconventional pairing may raise more than a few eyebrows, it beckons us to ponder: Could the distribution of sociology pedagogues in the Volunteer State subtly sway the topics of pastimes that grace the pixels of xkcd? Or are we merely chasing shadows in the land of correlations and quips?
With an ever-curious spirit and an appreciation for the offbeat, we embark on this scholarly escapade to shed light on this quizzical conundrum and to perhaps unearth a few chuckles along the way. So, don your academic spectacles and buckle up for a journey that promises to be equal parts thought-provoking and light-hearted. Together, we shall navigate the intersection of sociological demographics and webcomic whimsy, seeking to unveil the unanticipated patterns that emerge when academia and pop culture collide.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation into the relationship between college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the portrayal of hobbies in xkcd comics is a novel endeavor that bridges the realms of academia and pop culture. Previous research by Smith (2015) and Doe (2017) has primarily focused on the impact of academic demographics on cultural representations in various media forms. However, none have dared to venture into the peculiar domain of webcomics and the specific nexus of universities in Tennessee and stick-figure humor.

Smith (2015) delved into the influence of academic specialization on the portrayal of leisure activities in television shows, while Doe (2017) examined the manifestation of sociological themes in popular literature. These studies lay the groundwork for understanding the potential effects of scholarly concentrations on cultural depictions. Moving forward, our study seeks to extend this line of inquiry to the distinctive landscape of webcomics and the idiosyncratic world of xkcd.

Expanding beyond academic literature, books such as "Leisure and Society" by Williams (2018), and "The Sociology of Pop Culture" by Brown (2020) have provided significant insights into the intersection of leisure, sociology, and cultural representation, offering valuable theoretical frameworks for our investigation. Furthermore, fictional works such as "The Comic Book Story of Video Games" by Hennessey and McGowan (2017) and "The Sociology of The Simpsons" by Turner (2003) offer playful, yet insightful perspectives that highlight the potential for interplay between sociological concepts and popular media.

With an abundance of scholarly and fictional resources at our disposal, the literature review process for this study has been as rigorous as it has been entertaining. In addition to traditional academic sources, unconventional methods, including scouring through the back covers of shampoo bottles, have also been employed as part of an exhaustive effort to comprehensively grasp the multifaceted relationship between college sociology teachers in Tennessee and xkcd comics about hobbies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and xkcd comics published about hobbies. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and AI analysis of xkcd comics . You used data from 2007 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Social Science of Comics: An Analysis of the Correlation between College Sociology Teachers in Tennessee and xkcd Comics on Hobbies"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a quantitative investigation into the intriguing relationship between the demographic distribution of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the representation of hobbies in xkcd comics. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and artificial intelligence analysis of xkcd comics published between 2007 and 2021, we have computed a correlation coefficient of 0.6995228 (p < 0.01) that warrants further exploration. Our findings not only shed light on the potential influence of academic specialization on the portrayal of leisure activities, but also provide fodder for some lighthearted musings at the intersection of academia and pop culture.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the vast and wacky world of pop culture, the realm of webcomics holds a special place. One particular webcomic, xkcd, has captivated audiences with its unique blend of humor, science, and stick-figure artwork. While many have marveled at the wit and wisdom embedded within the panels of xkcd, few have ventured into the uncharted territory of unraveling the mysterious connections between the comic's content and the demographic landscape of academia.
Intriguingly, the present study aims to explore the often-overlooked correlation between the number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the portrayal of hobbies in xkcd comics. Yes, you read that right – we are delving into the realm of academic demographics and webcomic musings, a juncture where data analysis meets doodles, and statistical significance dances with stick figures.
Although this unconventional pairing may raise more than a few eyebrows, it beckons us to ponder: Could the distribution of sociology pedagogues in the Volunteer State subtly sway the topics of pastimes that grace the pixels of xkcd? Or are we merely chasing shadows in the land of correlations and quips?
With an ever-curious spirit and an appreciation for the offbeat, we embark on this scholarly escapade to shed light on this quizzical conundrum and to perhaps unearth a few chuckles along the way. So, don your academic spectacles and buckle up for a journey that promises to be equal parts thought-provoking and light-hearted. Together, we shall navigate the intersection of sociological demographics and webcomic whimsy, seeking to unveil the unanticipated patterns that emerge when academia and pop culture collide.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To explore the quirky correlation between the number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the portrayal of hobbies in xkcd comics, we embarked on a data odyssey that could rival even the most epic webcomic adventure. Our research team first obtained data on the demographic distribution of college sociology teachers in Tennessee from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This data, while not as visually stimulating as a webcomic, provided the necessary groundwork for our statistical escapade.

Meanwhile, we delved into the whimsical world of xkcd comics, where stick figures and scientific ponderings collide in a delightful symphony of wit. To quantify the representation of hobbies in xkcd, we employed the sophisticated technique of artificial intelligence (AI) analysis. This involved training a model to identify and categorize the myriad pursuits and pastimes depicted in the comic series, an endeavor that required a keen eye for detail and a dash of algorithmic whimsy.

With data in hand, we set forth on the arduous yet exhilarating task of establishing a quantitative link between the two seemingly disparate domains. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we computed a correlation coefficient that stood as a testament to the enigmatic relationship between sociology academia and webcomic musings. Our data spanned the years 2007 to 2021, capturing a wide swath of sociological pedagogical trends and xkcd whimsy, allowing us to unravel patterns and peculiarities that may have otherwise remained hidden in the virtual ether.

In the spirit of scholarly zaniness, our methodology embraced the unconventional and celebrated the unexpected. By combining traditional demographic data with cutting-edge AI analysis, we ventured into uncharted territory, where the rigors of statistical inquiry intertwined with the whimsy of webcomic interpretation. It was an endeavor that demanded equal parts logic and levity, and our research team embraced the challenge with fervor and a healthy dose of humor.

In the chapters that follow, we invite readers to join us on this scholarly romp, where data-driven analysis and comic-inspired capers converge. Through the lens of our unique methodology, we aim to not only shed light on the correlation at hand but also to inject a touch of whimsy into the often-serious realm of academic inquiry. So, dear reader, prepare to embark on a journey that promises both statistical revelations and comic relief, as we navigate the intriguing intersection of sociological demographics and webcomic wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and xkcd comics published about hobbies. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and AI analysis of xkcd comics .

For the time period 2007 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.6995228, r-squared of 0.4893321, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Social Science of Comics: An Analysis of the Correlation between College Sociology Teachers in Tennessee and xkcd Comics on Hobbies"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a quantitative investigation into the intriguing relationship between the demographic distribution of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the representation of hobbies in xkcd comics. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and artificial intelligence analysis of xkcd comics published between 2007 and 2021, we have computed a correlation coefficient of 0.6995228 (p < 0.01) that warrants further exploration. Our findings not only shed light on the potential influence of academic specialization on the portrayal of leisure activities, but also provide fodder for some lighthearted musings at the intersection of academia and pop culture.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
In the vast and wacky world of pop culture, the realm of webcomics holds a special place. One particular webcomic, xkcd, has captivated audiences with its unique blend of humor, science, and stick-figure artwork. While many have marveled at the wit and wisdom embedded within the panels of xkcd, few have ventured into the uncharted territory of unraveling the mysterious connections between the comic's content and the demographic landscape of academia.
Intriguingly, the present study aims to explore the often-overlooked correlation between the number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the portrayal of hobbies in xkcd comics. Yes, you read that right – we are delving into the realm of academic demographics and webcomic musings, a juncture where data analysis meets doodles, and statistical significance dances with stick figures.
Although this unconventional pairing may raise more than a few eyebrows, it beckons us to ponder: Could the distribution of sociology pedagogues in the Volunteer State subtly sway the topics of pastimes that grace the pixels of xkcd? Or are we merely chasing shadows in the land of correlations and quips?
With an ever-curious spirit and an appreciation for the offbeat, we embark on this scholarly escapade to shed light on this quizzical conundrum and to perhaps unearth a few chuckles along the way. So, don your academic spectacles and buckle up for a journey that promises to be equal parts thought-provoking and light-hearted. Together, we shall navigate the intersection of sociological demographics and webcomic whimsy, seeking to unveil the unanticipated patterns that emerge when academia and pop culture collide.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The main objective of this study was to explore the potential correlation between the number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the portrayal of hobbies in xkcd comics. Our analysis covered the period from 2007 to 2021, during which we meticulously collected data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and ruthlessly scrutinized a grand assembly of xkcd comics through the lens of artificial intelligence. The resulting correlation coefficient of 0.6995228, with an r-squared of 0.4893321 and a p-value less than 0.01, may initially seem surprising, but it offers some tantalizing food for thought - and amusement.

A striking visual representation of our findings is encapsulated in Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the two variables. The scatterplot not only serves as evidence of the statistically significant association uncovered in our analysis but also beckons the viewer to reflect on the curious dance of sociological demographics and web-based humor.

This correlation value of 0.6995228 suggests a strong positive relationship between the number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the frequency of xkcd comics featuring hobbies. While this may seem amusingly nonsensical at first, the statistical significance of this relationship demands further exploration and contemplation. Are the musings of Randall Munroe, the creator of xkcd, subtly influenced by the academic landscape of Tennessee? Or is this correlation simply a whimsical quirk of happenstance?

Our quantitative findings not only underscore the potential impact of academic demographics on the thematic content of a well-loved webcomic but also invite enthusiasts of both sociology and stick-figure art to engage in some playful pondering. It appears that the interplay between academia and webcomics is not just an amusing side note but a dimension worthy of deeper inquiry. This intersection offers a canvas for scholarly amusement and intellectual curiosity, encouraging us to consider the multifaceted influences that shape the content of our favorite webcomics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and xkcd comics published about hobbies. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Social Science of Comics: An Analysis of the Correlation between College Sociology Teachers in Tennessee and xkcd Comics on Hobbies"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a quantitative investigation into the intriguing relationship between the demographic distribution of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the representation of hobbies in xkcd comics. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and artificial intelligence analysis of xkcd comics published between 2007 and 2021, we have computed a correlation coefficient of 0.6995228 (p < 0.01) that warrants further exploration. Our findings not only shed light on the potential influence of academic specialization on the portrayal of leisure activities, but also provide fodder for some lighthearted musings at the intersection of academia and pop culture.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation into the relationship between college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the portrayal of hobbies in xkcd comics is a novel endeavor that bridges the realms of academia and pop culture. Previous research by Smith (2015) and Doe (2017) has primarily focused on the impact of academic demographics on cultural representations in various media forms. However, none have dared to venture into the peculiar domain of webcomics and the specific nexus of universities in Tennessee and stick-figure humor.
Smith (2015) delved into the influence of academic specialization on the portrayal of leisure activities in television shows, while Doe (2017) examined the manifestation of sociological themes in popular literature. These studies lay the groundwork for understanding the potential effects of scholarly concentrations on cultural depictions. Moving forward, our study seeks to extend this line of inquiry to the distinctive landscape of webcomics and the idiosyncratic world of xkcd.
Expanding beyond academic literature, books such as "Leisure and Society" by Williams (2018), and "The Sociology of Pop Culture" by Brown (2020) have provided significant insights into the intersection of leisure, sociology, and cultural representation, offering valuable theoretical frameworks for our investigation. Furthermore, fictional works such as "The Comic Book Story of Video Games" by Hennessey and McGowan (2017) and "The Sociology of The Simpsons" by Turner (2003) offer playful, yet insightful perspectives that highlight the potential for interplay between sociological concepts and popular media.
With an abundance of scholarly and fictional resources at our disposal, the literature review process for this study has been as rigorous as it has been entertaining. In addition to traditional academic sources, unconventional methods, including scouring through the back covers of shampoo bottles, have also been employed as part of an exhaustive effort to comprehensively grasp the multifaceted relationship between college sociology teachers in Tennessee and xkcd comics about hobbies.

[[RESULTS]]
The main objective of this study was to explore the potential correlation between the number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the portrayal of hobbies in xkcd comics. Our analysis covered the period from 2007 to 2021, during which we meticulously collected data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and ruthlessly scrutinized a grand assembly of xkcd comics through the lens of artificial intelligence. The resulting correlation coefficient of 0.6995228, with an r-squared of 0.4893321 and a p-value less than 0.01, may initially seem surprising, but it offers some tantalizing food for thought - and amusement.
A striking visual representation of our findings is encapsulated in Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the two variables. The scatterplot not only serves as evidence of the statistically significant association uncovered in our analysis but also beckons the viewer to reflect on the curious dance of sociological demographics and web-based humor.
This correlation value of 0.6995228 suggests a strong positive relationship between the number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the frequency of xkcd comics featuring hobbies. While this may seem amusingly nonsensical at first, the statistical significance of this relationship demands further exploration and contemplation. Are the musings of Randall Munroe, the creator of xkcd, subtly influenced by the academic landscape of Tennessee? Or is this correlation simply a whimsical quirk of happenstance?
Our quantitative findings not only underscore the potential impact of academic demographics on the thematic content of a well-loved webcomic but also invite enthusiasts of both sociology and stick-figure art to engage in some playful pondering. It appears that the interplay between academia and webcomics is not just an amusing side note but a dimension worthy of deeper inquiry. This intersection offers a canvas for scholarly amusement and intellectual curiosity, encouraging us to consider the multifaceted influences that shape the content of our favorite webcomics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our research have revealed a surprisingly strong correlation between the number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the portrayal of hobbies in xkcd comics. While this connection may initially seem as unexpected as finding an accidental pun in a serious conversation, it is crucial to recognize the significance of this discovery in understanding the interplay between academic demographics and cultural representation.

Our results are in line with the previous studies by Smith (2015) and Doe (2017), which have also indicated the potential influence of academic expertise on the portrayal of leisure activities in various media forms. This correlation not only adds a whimsical twist to the rather serious world of academia but also highlights the pervasive nature of scholarly influence, even in the seemingly carefree domain of webcomics.

In particular, the statistical significance of our findings reinforces the notion proposed by Williams (2018) and Brown (2020) that sociological concepts and academic specializations can shape the portrayal of leisure and popular culture. This presents an amusing paradox - the serious business of academia impacting the lighthearted world of hobby-centric webcomics, akin to stumbling upon a doctoral dissertation about the sociological implications of the "dad jokes" in comic strips.

Additionally, our study underscores the potential for scholarly amusement and intellectual curiosity at the intersection of academia and popular culture, echoing the playful yet insightful perspectives offered by Hennessey, McGowan (2017), and Turner (2003). The correlation we have uncovered not only serves as a source of amusement but also invites the academia-minded readers to engage in some delightfully quirky contemplation about the potential factors influencing webcomic content.

In summary, our study offers a lively anecdote in the academic landscape, shedding light on the unexpected connections between sociology and stick-figure humor. The statistical correlation we have unveiled between college sociology teachers in Tennessee and xkcd comics about hobbies serves as a reminder that even in the realm of serious research, surprising and amusing discoveries are waiting to be unveiled. This correlation beckons us to ponder: the next time a Tennessee-based sociologist reads an xkcd comic about hobbies, will they find themselves unintentionally analyzing its sociocultural implications, or simply enjoying a punny moment of leisurely respite?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and xkcd comics published about hobbies. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Social Science of Comics: An Analysis of the Correlation between College Sociology Teachers in Tennessee and xkcd Comics on Hobbies"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a quantitative investigation into the intriguing relationship between the demographic distribution of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the representation of hobbies in xkcd comics. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and artificial intelligence analysis of xkcd comics published between 2007 and 2021, we have computed a correlation coefficient of 0.6995228 (p < 0.01) that warrants further exploration. Our findings not only shed light on the potential influence of academic specialization on the portrayal of leisure activities, but also provide fodder for some lighthearted musings at the intersection of academia and pop culture.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the vast and wacky world of pop culture, the realm of webcomics holds a special place. One particular webcomic, xkcd, has captivated audiences with its unique blend of humor, science, and stick-figure artwork. While many have marveled at the wit and wisdom embedded within the panels of xkcd, few have ventured into the uncharted territory of unraveling the mysterious connections between the comic's content and the demographic landscape of academia.
Intriguingly, the present study aims to explore the often-overlooked correlation between the number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the portrayal of hobbies in xkcd comics. Yes, you read that right – we are delving into the realm of academic demographics and webcomic musings, a juncture where data analysis meets doodles, and statistical significance dances with stick figures.
Although this unconventional pairing may raise more than a few eyebrows, it beckons us to ponder: Could the distribution of sociology pedagogues in the Volunteer State subtly sway the topics of pastimes that grace the pixels of xkcd? Or are we merely chasing shadows in the land of correlations and quips?
With an ever-curious spirit and an appreciation for the offbeat, we embark on this scholarly escapade to shed light on this quizzical conundrum and to perhaps unearth a few chuckles along the way. So, don your academic spectacles and buckle up for a journey that promises to be equal parts thought-provoking and light-hearted. Together, we shall navigate the intersection of sociological demographics and webcomic whimsy, seeking to unveil the unanticipated patterns that emerge when academia and pop culture collide.

[[RESULTS]]
The main objective of this study was to explore the potential correlation between the number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the portrayal of hobbies in xkcd comics. Our analysis covered the period from 2007 to 2021, during which we meticulously collected data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and ruthlessly scrutinized a grand assembly of xkcd comics through the lens of artificial intelligence. The resulting correlation coefficient of 0.6995228, with an r-squared of 0.4893321 and a p-value less than 0.01, may initially seem surprising, but it offers some tantalizing food for thought - and amusement.
A striking visual representation of our findings is encapsulated in Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the two variables. The scatterplot not only serves as evidence of the statistically significant association uncovered in our analysis but also beckons the viewer to reflect on the curious dance of sociological demographics and web-based humor.
This correlation value of 0.6995228 suggests a strong positive relationship between the number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the frequency of xkcd comics featuring hobbies. While this may seem amusingly nonsensical at first, the statistical significance of this relationship demands further exploration and contemplation. Are the musings of Randall Munroe, the creator of xkcd, subtly influenced by the academic landscape of Tennessee? Or is this correlation simply a whimsical quirk of happenstance?
Our quantitative findings not only underscore the potential impact of academic demographics on the thematic content of a well-loved webcomic but also invite enthusiasts of both sociology and stick-figure art to engage in some playful pondering. It appears that the interplay between academia and webcomics is not just an amusing side note but a dimension worthy of deeper inquiry. This intersection offers a canvas for scholarly amusement and intellectual curiosity, encouraging us to consider the multifaceted influences that shape the content of our favorite webcomics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has brought to light a rather unexpected yet statistically robust relationship between the number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the depiction of hobbies in xkcd comics. The correlation coefficient of 0.6995228, coupled with a p-value less than 0.01, paints a compelling picture of the intertwined nature of a seemingly disparate academic demographic and the whimsical world of webcomics.

While it may be tempting to dismiss this correlation as a mere quirk of fate, or perhaps a consequence of a particularly sociologically-inclined comic artist residing in Tennessee, our findings prod us to ponder the deeper undercurrents at play. Could it be that the academic milieu of Tennessee exerts a faint yet discernible influence on the thematic landscape of xkcd? Or is this correlation an elaborate ruse concocted by the mischievous tendrils of statistical coincidence?

As we bid adieu to this unusual undertaking, we are reminded of the myriad peculiarities that infuse the tapestry of human experience – an academic curiosity in sociology and the lighthearted musings of a webcomic artist, intertwined in a delightful dance of correlation. While our contributions may have tickled the fancy of both academia and comic enthusiasts, it is with a hint of whimsy that we declare: no further research in this delightful intersection is warranted. The comedy and sociology world can rest easy knowing that this enigmatic correlation has been given its due moment in the scholarly spotlight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Social Science of Comics: An Analysis of the Correlation between College Sociology Teachers in Tennessee and xkcd Comics on Hobbies. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Humor and Social Sciences


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Social Science of Comics: An Analysis of the Correlation between College Sociology Teachers in Tennessee and xkcd Comics on Hobbies. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Interdisciplinary Humor Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Social Science of Comics: An Analysis of the Correlation between College Sociology Teachers in Tennessee and xkcd Comics on Hobbies with an abstract of This paper presents a quantitative investigation into the intriguing relationship between the demographic distribution of college sociology teachers in Tennessee and the representation of hobbies in xkcd comics. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and artificial intelligence analysis of xkcd comics published between 2007 and 2021, we have computed a correlation coefficient of 0.6995228 (p < 0.01) that warrants further exploration. Our findings not only shed light on the potential influence of academic specialization on the portrayal of leisure activities, but also provide fodder for some lighthearted musings at the intersection of academia and pop culture.

ChatGPT:

xkcd comics, college sociology teachers, Tennessee, demographic distribution, hobbies, correlation, artificial intelligence analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, leisure activities, academic specialization, pop culture

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of sociology teachers, postsecondary in Tennessee
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee

xkcd comics published about hobbies
Detailed data title: The number of xkcd comics published each year about hobbies
Source: AI analysis of xkcd comics
Additional Info: I designed a Python workflow to perform OCR on every xkcd comic, feed that text into a large language model, and ask the model whether this comic was about the category named in the title.

See what else correlates with xkcd comics published about hobbies

Correlation r = 0.6995228 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4893321 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 48.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., xkcd comics published about hobbies) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee) over the 15 years from 2007 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0037. 0.0036993731420825854000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.7 in 0.37% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 270 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.29, 0.89 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
The number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee (Laborers)820280250270240300300330190210450570570310280
xkcd comics published about hobbies (xkcd comics)181210581181386111010710




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,213 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 635,695,369 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([820,280,250,270,240,300,300,330,190,210,450,570,570,310,280,])
array_2 = np.array([18,12,10,5,8,11,8,13,8,6,11,10,10,7,10,])
array_1_name = "The number of college sociology teachers in Tennessee"
array_2_name = "xkcd comics published about hobbies"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 2576 · Black Variable ID: 14450 · Red Variable ID: 20015
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0