about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,506 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and the second variable is Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The alien umpires realized there were enough close calls in baseball without their interference.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [A colorful depiction capturing the thrilling moment of a World Series baseball game. The stadium's vibrant atmosphere is clearly visible, with the sprawling audience, the neatly trimmed field, and the layer of excitement that hangs in the air. The players are dynamically positioned, conveying the intensity of the game’s final inning. Amidst the drama, an otherworldly, majestic UFO silently glides across the sky, providing a fantastical element to the otherwise familiar scene.] The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute 2D animation A TIME magazine cover image Celtic art Macabre Cute 2D animation
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting', in the following situation: Fans were too busy watching the close game to look up at the sky, and thus missed the UFO flyby. Tightening up the defense in the outfield - and in the universe!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: The baseball stadium is packed with fans on the edge of their seats as the home team leads by one run in the final inning of the World Series. The outfielders are positioned strategically, ready to tighten up the defense. As the tension rises, a UFO silently flies across the sky, but no one notices as all eyes are glued to the game, and nobody searches for 'report UFO sighting' on Google.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: The baseball stadium is packed with fans on the edge of their seats as the home team leads by one run in the final inning of the World Series. The outfielders are positioned strategically, ready to tighten up the defense. As the tension rises, a UFO silently flies across the sky, but no one notices as all eyes are glued to the game, and nobody searches for 'report UFO sighting' on Google. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [A colorful depiction capturing the thrilling moment of a World Series baseball game. The stadium's vibrant atmosphere is clearly visible, with the sprawling audience, the neatly trimmed field, and the layer of excitement that hangs in the air. The players are dynamically positioned, conveying the intensity of the game’s final inning. Amidst the drama, an otherworldly, majestic UFO silently glides across the sky, providing a fantastical element to the otherwise familiar scene.]

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series caused report UFO sighting (Google searches for 'report UFO sighting') to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
World Series Score Difference and UFO Sightings: A Statistical Odyssey

The Journal of Extraterrestrial Statistics and Sports Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6334511 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"World Series Score Difference and UFO Sightings: A Statistical Odyssey"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this inexplicably intriguing study, we delve into the curious connection between the nail-biting score difference in the final game of the World Series and the penchant for individuals to conduct surreptitious searches for 'report UFO sighting' on Google. Our intrepid research team, armed with data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, observed patterns spanning from 2004 to 2022 and identified a correlation coefficient of 0.6334511, with a robustly significant p-value of less than 0.01. Could it be that when the baseball tension reaches its zenith, the atmospheric curiosity for extraterrestrial sightings also hits a home run? Join us in this statistical odyssey as we unravel this peculiar phenomenon and shed light on an otherworldly aspect of sports-related fervor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"World Series Score Difference and UFO Sightings: A Statistical Odyssey"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this inexplicably intriguing study, we delve into the curious connection between the nail-biting score difference in the final game of the World Series and the penchant for individuals to conduct surreptitious searches for 'report UFO sighting' on Google. Our intrepid research team, armed with data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, observed patterns spanning from 2004 to 2022 and identified a correlation coefficient of 0.6334511, with a robustly significant p-value of less than 0.01. Could it be that when the baseball tension reaches its zenith, the atmospheric curiosity for extraterrestrial sightings also hits a home run? Join us in this statistical odyssey as we unravel this peculiar phenomenon and shed light on an otherworldly aspect of sports-related fervor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Through the annals of statistical research, numerous inexplicable connections have been probed and pondered, from the correlation between the number of Nicolas Cage movies released and the number of swimming pool drownings to the link between the consumption of cheese and the likelihood of dying tangled in bed-sheets (yes, that's a real study!). However, in the grand tapestry of peculiar statistical associations, there's a new player in town - the connection between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the fervent quest for extraterrestrial encounters, as indicated by Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'.

The purpose of our study is not just to unearth a mere statistical correlation but to embark on a whimsical odyssey to uncover the underlying mechanisms that tie the thrill of baseball showdowns to the urge to report Unidentified Flying Objects. What prompts individuals, quivering with the vicarious adrenaline rush from a high-stakes, game-ending maneuver, to suddenly pivot to the cosmic realm of UFO sightings on the internet?

Now, before you raise an eyebrow quizzically like a skeptical alien encountering Earth's perplexing customs, let's address the pink elephant in the room - the enduring question of causation versus mere correlation. Are we suggesting that a close baseball game directly causes an upsurge in UFO sightings, or are we merely witnessing a serendipitous statistical dance of unrelated phenomena? Fear not, dear reader; we shall tread this statistically treacherous terrain with cautious optimism and a whimsical sense of humor.

In this quintessentially quirky pursuit, we shall harness the power of data, diving into the rich repositories of World Series score differentials and Google Trends search indices. From the exhilarating highs of 2004's Red Sox triumph to the nail-biting moments of recent years, our statistical compass shall navigate the choppy seas of game unpredictability and UFO enthusiasm.

So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a wild statistical ride as we explore this fantastical combination of America's favorite pastime and humanity's enduring wonderment with the great unknown. Let the games – and UFO sightings – begin!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"World Series Score Difference and UFO Sightings: A Statistical Odyssey"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this inexplicably intriguing study, we delve into the curious connection between the nail-biting score difference in the final game of the World Series and the penchant for individuals to conduct surreptitious searches for 'report UFO sighting' on Google. Our intrepid research team, armed with data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, observed patterns spanning from 2004 to 2022 and identified a correlation coefficient of 0.6334511, with a robustly significant p-value of less than 0.01. Could it be that when the baseball tension reaches its zenith, the atmospheric curiosity for extraterrestrial sightings also hits a home run? Join us in this statistical odyssey as we unravel this peculiar phenomenon and shed light on an otherworldly aspect of sports-related fervor.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Through the annals of statistical research, numerous inexplicable connections have been probed and pondered, from the correlation between the number of Nicolas Cage movies released and the number of swimming pool drownings to the link between the consumption of cheese and the likelihood of dying tangled in bed-sheets (yes, that's a real study!). However, in the grand tapestry of peculiar statistical associations, there's a new player in town - the connection between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the fervent quest for extraterrestrial encounters, as indicated by Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'.
The purpose of our study is not just to unearth a mere statistical correlation but to embark on a whimsical odyssey to uncover the underlying mechanisms that tie the thrill of baseball showdowns to the urge to report Unidentified Flying Objects. What prompts individuals, quivering with the vicarious adrenaline rush from a high-stakes, game-ending maneuver, to suddenly pivot to the cosmic realm of UFO sightings on the internet?
Now, before you raise an eyebrow quizzically like a skeptical alien encountering Earth's perplexing customs, let's address the pink elephant in the room - the enduring question of causation versus mere correlation. Are we suggesting that a close baseball game directly causes an upsurge in UFO sightings, or are we merely witnessing a serendipitous statistical dance of unrelated phenomena? Fear not, dear reader; we shall tread this statistically treacherous terrain with cautious optimism and a whimsical sense of humor.
In this quintessentially quirky pursuit, we shall harness the power of data, diving into the rich repositories of World Series score differentials and Google Trends search indices. From the exhilarating highs of 2004's Red Sox triumph to the nail-biting moments of recent years, our statistical compass shall navigate the choppy seas of game unpredictability and UFO enthusiasm.
So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a wild statistical ride as we explore this fantastical combination of America's favorite pastime and humanity's enduring wonderment with the great unknown. Let the games – and UFO sightings – begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The curious nexus between seemingly unrelated phenomena, such as the outcome of the final game of the World Series and the fervent quest for hypothetical extraterrestrial encounters, has captivated the minds of scholars across disciplines. Adding a whimsical twist to the realm of statistical analysis, this section aims to amalgamate grave scholarly research with a dash of levity, encapsulating the veritable rollercoaster of literature that underpins this singular undertaking.

In "Smith et al.," the authors meticulously examine the psychological and emotional dynamics of sports fans during high-stakes, game-ending matchups. Evidenced by elevated heart rates, increased adrenaline secretion, and momentary lapses in rational thought, the culmination of a gripping World Series game is posited to induce a transient state of heightened emotional susceptibility. This state, the authors argue, may prompt individuals to stray from their typical internet browsing habits and embark on unconventional cyber searches, including but not limited to, the coercive impulse to 'report UFO sighting'.

Complementing this perspective, in the groundbreaking work of "Doe and Jones," the authors delve into the vicarious thrill that viewers experience during nail-biting sports events. The authors posit that the euphoria derived from witnessing a close, edge-of-the-seat finish may engender an altered cognitive state, characterized by a proclivity for engaging in atypical activities. This proclivity, the authors contend, may manifest in a surge of online searches related to ethereal phenomena, including the facilitation of UFO sighting reports.

Venturing into the intersection of popular culture and the human proclivity for fantastical narratives, the genre of non-fiction literature provides a treasure trove of insights ripe for exploration. "UFOs and Extraterrestrial Visitations: An Encyclopedia of the Anomalous, the Unexplained, and the Earthly" by Jerome Clark, presents a comprehensive compendium of historical accounts of purported UFO sightings, unraveling the intricate web of folklore, conjecture, and dubious testimonials. The work, while not directly linked to the World Series or sports events, offers a nuanced view of the public fascination with the enigmatic, a fascination that may be uniquely agitated during periods of heightened collective emotion, such as the aftermath of a gripping sports finale.

Delving further into the realm of speculative fiction, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "Contact" by Carl Sagan entertain the assemblage of extraordinary circumstances, wherein the ordinary and the extraordinary coalesce into an intertwining tapestry of events. While not directly addressing the statistical connection between sports outcomes and UFO sightings, these works, epitomes of the human imagination unbound, underscore the enduring appeal of fantastical narratives, a facet of the human psyche irreversibly intertwined with the venture for the anomalous, be it in the world of sports or the celestial unknown.

In an unanticipated departure from the canonical realm, the robustness of this literature review was further fortified by perusing an eclectic array of sources, including the cryptic scribbles on age-old parchment scrolls, the profusion of inscrutable memes embellishing the digital landscape, and the labyrinthine conundrums embedded within the egregiously long CVS receipts. While the validity of these sources may be questioned by the astute academic purist, their quirky appeal and unorthodox veracity cannot be discounted in this quest for unparalleled statistical adventure.

The effervescent melange of scholarly conjecture, literary wanderlust, and the idiosyncratic pursuit of the unconventional culminates in a symphony of inquiry, engendering a multidimensional dialogue that transcends the traditional confines of academic discourse. As the proverbial needle of statistical inquiry traverses the tapestry of peculiar correlations, we are emboldened to march forward, armed with resolve, statistical acumen, and an unwavering penchant for the audaciously absurd.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"World Series Score Difference and UFO Sightings: A Statistical Odyssey"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this inexplicably intriguing study, we delve into the curious connection between the nail-biting score difference in the final game of the World Series and the penchant for individuals to conduct surreptitious searches for 'report UFO sighting' on Google. Our intrepid research team, armed with data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, observed patterns spanning from 2004 to 2022 and identified a correlation coefficient of 0.6334511, with a robustly significant p-value of less than 0.01. Could it be that when the baseball tension reaches its zenith, the atmospheric curiosity for extraterrestrial sightings also hits a home run? Join us in this statistical odyssey as we unravel this peculiar phenomenon and shed light on an otherworldly aspect of sports-related fervor.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Through the annals of statistical research, numerous inexplicable connections have been probed and pondered, from the correlation between the number of Nicolas Cage movies released and the number of swimming pool drownings to the link between the consumption of cheese and the likelihood of dying tangled in bed-sheets (yes, that's a real study!). However, in the grand tapestry of peculiar statistical associations, there's a new player in town - the connection between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the fervent quest for extraterrestrial encounters, as indicated by Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'.
The purpose of our study is not just to unearth a mere statistical correlation but to embark on a whimsical odyssey to uncover the underlying mechanisms that tie the thrill of baseball showdowns to the urge to report Unidentified Flying Objects. What prompts individuals, quivering with the vicarious adrenaline rush from a high-stakes, game-ending maneuver, to suddenly pivot to the cosmic realm of UFO sightings on the internet?
Now, before you raise an eyebrow quizzically like a skeptical alien encountering Earth's perplexing customs, let's address the pink elephant in the room - the enduring question of causation versus mere correlation. Are we suggesting that a close baseball game directly causes an upsurge in UFO sightings, or are we merely witnessing a serendipitous statistical dance of unrelated phenomena? Fear not, dear reader; we shall tread this statistically treacherous terrain with cautious optimism and a whimsical sense of humor.
In this quintessentially quirky pursuit, we shall harness the power of data, diving into the rich repositories of World Series score differentials and Google Trends search indices. From the exhilarating highs of 2004's Red Sox triumph to the nail-biting moments of recent years, our statistical compass shall navigate the choppy seas of game unpredictability and UFO enthusiasm.
So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a wild statistical ride as we explore this fantastical combination of America's favorite pastime and humanity's enduring wonderment with the great unknown. Let the games – and UFO sightings – begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on this captivating statistical odyssey, our research team embraced the art of data sleuthing with fervor and a dash of whimsy. Our treasure trove of data encompassed the scores of every final game of the World Series from 2004 to 2022, sourced from reputable websites, fan forums, and the occasional shamanic oracle. The scoring difference, representing the heart-stopping spread between victory and defeat, served as our beacon in the tumultuous sea of baseball glory, guiding us through the jubilant clamor of triumph and the poignant rumbles of defeat.

Turning to the enigmatic domain of extraterrestrial curiosity, we tapped into the virtual oracle that is Google Trends, meticulously tracking the search frequency for the illustrious phrase 'report UFO sighting.' With a keen eye for statistical relevance and a flair for the unusual, we observed the ebb and flow of Google searches, which mirrored the cyclical dance of celestial intrigues and terrestrial drama.

Our methodological journey took an unexpected turn as we encountered the quixotic challenge of untangling the web of human curiosity, cosmic wonderment, and the visceral thrill of sporting showdowns. Enlisting the formidable tools of correlation analysis, we dissected the intertwining tendrils of data, unraveling a correlation coefficient of 0.6334511. This coefficient, standing tall and proud like a home run in statistical significance, bore a p-value of less than 0.01, speaking volumes about the robustness of our findings and the captivating connection we sought to illuminate.

Speaking figuratively, we navigated through the treacherous statistical currents with the flair of a daring captain steering a ship through uncharted waters, charting the peaks and troughs of this intriguing statistical landscape. Our methodology, though unconventional in its zany elegance, provided a panoramic view of the confluence of America's favorite pastime and mankind's insatiable quest for the enigmatic beyond.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6334511, r-squared of 0.4012603, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"World Series Score Difference and UFO Sightings: A Statistical Odyssey"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this inexplicably intriguing study, we delve into the curious connection between the nail-biting score difference in the final game of the World Series and the penchant for individuals to conduct surreptitious searches for 'report UFO sighting' on Google. Our intrepid research team, armed with data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, observed patterns spanning from 2004 to 2022 and identified a correlation coefficient of 0.6334511, with a robustly significant p-value of less than 0.01. Could it be that when the baseball tension reaches its zenith, the atmospheric curiosity for extraterrestrial sightings also hits a home run? Join us in this statistical odyssey as we unravel this peculiar phenomenon and shed light on an otherworldly aspect of sports-related fervor.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Through the annals of statistical research, numerous inexplicable connections have been probed and pondered, from the correlation between the number of Nicolas Cage movies released and the number of swimming pool drownings to the link between the consumption of cheese and the likelihood of dying tangled in bed-sheets (yes, that's a real study!). However, in the grand tapestry of peculiar statistical associations, there's a new player in town - the connection between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the fervent quest for extraterrestrial encounters, as indicated by Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'.
The purpose of our study is not just to unearth a mere statistical correlation but to embark on a whimsical odyssey to uncover the underlying mechanisms that tie the thrill of baseball showdowns to the urge to report Unidentified Flying Objects. What prompts individuals, quivering with the vicarious adrenaline rush from a high-stakes, game-ending maneuver, to suddenly pivot to the cosmic realm of UFO sightings on the internet?
Now, before you raise an eyebrow quizzically like a skeptical alien encountering Earth's perplexing customs, let's address the pink elephant in the room - the enduring question of causation versus mere correlation. Are we suggesting that a close baseball game directly causes an upsurge in UFO sightings, or are we merely witnessing a serendipitous statistical dance of unrelated phenomena? Fear not, dear reader; we shall tread this statistically treacherous terrain with cautious optimism and a whimsical sense of humor.
In this quintessentially quirky pursuit, we shall harness the power of data, diving into the rich repositories of World Series score differentials and Google Trends search indices. From the exhilarating highs of 2004's Red Sox triumph to the nail-biting moments of recent years, our statistical compass shall navigate the choppy seas of game unpredictability and UFO enthusiasm.
So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a wild statistical ride as we explore this fantastical combination of America's favorite pastime and humanity's enduring wonderment with the great unknown. Let the games – and UFO sightings – begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our study sent us on a captivating statistical journey, unlocking a correlation coefficient of 0.6334511 and an r-squared of 0.4012603 between the nail-biting score difference in the final game of the World Series and the clandestine pursuit of information on reporting UFO sightings. This correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, left us in awe of the intriguing link between two seemingly disparate realms of human curiosity.

Fig. 1 illustrates this captivating relationship, presenting a scatterplot brimming with data points that mirror the cosmic dance between the heart-stopping drama of a closely contested baseball victory and the mystical allure of potential extraterrestrial encounters. It is as if our statistical analysis has discovered an intergalactic union, a celestial tango hidden within the annals of baseball history.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.6334511 evokes the image of two celestial bodies aligning in perfect harmony, while the r-squared of 0.4012603 encapsulates the dynamic interplay between these seemingly unrelated variables with a cosmic embrace. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 adds a touch of mystery to this intriguing statistical soiree, leaving us pondering whether there is, in fact, a cosmic force at play in the realm of sports and extraterrestrial fascination.

Our findings evoke a whimsical wonder, sparking curiosity akin to an eccentric celestial expedition into the statistical unknown. Could it be that in the throes of a nail-biting final game, as tension mounts and hearts race, the human spirit reaches out to embrace the cosmic, searching for answers that transcend the earthly confines of sports?

This statistical odyssey not only sheds light on the captivating connection between seemingly unrelated human curiosities but also beckons researchers to gaze into the statistical cosmos with a playful spirit and a curiosity that reaches beyond the bounds of traditional research paradigms. Our findings beckon others to join us in this quest to uncover the hidden statistical forces that guide human behavior, reminding us that even in the world of data and analysis, there is room for a bit of cosmic whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"World Series Score Difference and UFO Sightings: A Statistical Odyssey"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this inexplicably intriguing study, we delve into the curious connection between the nail-biting score difference in the final game of the World Series and the penchant for individuals to conduct surreptitious searches for 'report UFO sighting' on Google. Our intrepid research team, armed with data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, observed patterns spanning from 2004 to 2022 and identified a correlation coefficient of 0.6334511, with a robustly significant p-value of less than 0.01. Could it be that when the baseball tension reaches its zenith, the atmospheric curiosity for extraterrestrial sightings also hits a home run? Join us in this statistical odyssey as we unravel this peculiar phenomenon and shed light on an otherworldly aspect of sports-related fervor.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The curious nexus between seemingly unrelated phenomena, such as the outcome of the final game of the World Series and the fervent quest for hypothetical extraterrestrial encounters, has captivated the minds of scholars across disciplines. Adding a whimsical twist to the realm of statistical analysis, this section aims to amalgamate grave scholarly research with a dash of levity, encapsulating the veritable rollercoaster of literature that underpins this singular undertaking.
In "Smith et al.," the authors meticulously examine the psychological and emotional dynamics of sports fans during high-stakes, game-ending matchups. Evidenced by elevated heart rates, increased adrenaline secretion, and momentary lapses in rational thought, the culmination of a gripping World Series game is posited to induce a transient state of heightened emotional susceptibility. This state, the authors argue, may prompt individuals to stray from their typical internet browsing habits and embark on unconventional cyber searches, including but not limited to, the coercive impulse to 'report UFO sighting'.
Complementing this perspective, in the groundbreaking work of "Doe and Jones," the authors delve into the vicarious thrill that viewers experience during nail-biting sports events. The authors posit that the euphoria derived from witnessing a close, edge-of-the-seat finish may engender an altered cognitive state, characterized by a proclivity for engaging in atypical activities. This proclivity, the authors contend, may manifest in a surge of online searches related to ethereal phenomena, including the facilitation of UFO sighting reports.
Venturing into the intersection of popular culture and the human proclivity for fantastical narratives, the genre of non-fiction literature provides a treasure trove of insights ripe for exploration. "UFOs and Extraterrestrial Visitations: An Encyclopedia of the Anomalous, the Unexplained, and the Earthly" by Jerome Clark, presents a comprehensive compendium of historical accounts of purported UFO sightings, unraveling the intricate web of folklore, conjecture, and dubious testimonials. The work, while not directly linked to the World Series or sports events, offers a nuanced view of the public fascination with the enigmatic, a fascination that may be uniquely agitated during periods of heightened collective emotion, such as the aftermath of a gripping sports finale.
Delving further into the realm of speculative fiction, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams and "Contact" by Carl Sagan entertain the assemblage of extraordinary circumstances, wherein the ordinary and the extraordinary coalesce into an intertwining tapestry of events. While not directly addressing the statistical connection between sports outcomes and UFO sightings, these works, epitomes of the human imagination unbound, underscore the enduring appeal of fantastical narratives, a facet of the human psyche irreversibly intertwined with the venture for the anomalous, be it in the world of sports or the celestial unknown.
In an unanticipated departure from the canonical realm, the robustness of this literature review was further fortified by perusing an eclectic array of sources, including the cryptic scribbles on age-old parchment scrolls, the profusion of inscrutable memes embellishing the digital landscape, and the labyrinthine conundrums embedded within the egregiously long CVS receipts. While the validity of these sources may be questioned by the astute academic purist, their quirky appeal and unorthodox veracity cannot be discounted in this quest for unparalleled statistical adventure.
The effervescent melange of scholarly conjecture, literary wanderlust, and the idiosyncratic pursuit of the unconventional culminates in a symphony of inquiry, engendering a multidimensional dialogue that transcends the traditional confines of academic discourse. As the proverbial needle of statistical inquiry traverses the tapestry of peculiar correlations, we are emboldened to march forward, armed with resolve, statistical acumen, and an unwavering penchant for the audaciously absurd.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study sent us on a captivating statistical journey, unlocking a correlation coefficient of 0.6334511 and an r-squared of 0.4012603 between the nail-biting score difference in the final game of the World Series and the clandestine pursuit of information on reporting UFO sightings. This correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, left us in awe of the intriguing link between two seemingly disparate realms of human curiosity.
Fig. 1 illustrates this captivating relationship, presenting a scatterplot brimming with data points that mirror the cosmic dance between the heart-stopping drama of a closely contested baseball victory and the mystical allure of potential extraterrestrial encounters. It is as if our statistical analysis has discovered an intergalactic union, a celestial tango hidden within the annals of baseball history.
The robust correlation coefficient of 0.6334511 evokes the image of two celestial bodies aligning in perfect harmony, while the r-squared of 0.4012603 encapsulates the dynamic interplay between these seemingly unrelated variables with a cosmic embrace. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 adds a touch of mystery to this intriguing statistical soiree, leaving us pondering whether there is, in fact, a cosmic force at play in the realm of sports and extraterrestrial fascination.
Our findings evoke a whimsical wonder, sparking curiosity akin to an eccentric celestial expedition into the statistical unknown. Could it be that in the throes of a nail-biting final game, as tension mounts and hearts race, the human spirit reaches out to embrace the cosmic, searching for answers that transcend the earthly confines of sports?
This statistical odyssey not only sheds light on the captivating connection between seemingly unrelated human curiosities but also beckons researchers to gaze into the statistical cosmos with a playful spirit and a curiosity that reaches beyond the bounds of traditional research paradigms. Our findings beckon others to join us in this quest to uncover the hidden statistical forces that guide human behavior, reminding us that even in the world of data and analysis, there is room for a bit of cosmic whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have brought to light a statistical odyssey, unraveling the enigmatic correlation between the nail-biting score difference in the final game of the World Series and the clandestine quest for information on reporting UFO sightings. Our findings not only corroborate but also elevate the existing body of research in this peculiar domain, unearthing a cosmic dance between the cosmic and the terrestrial, the unknown and the cherished.

Echoing the captivating work of "Smith et al.," our findings support the notion that the culmination of a gripping World Series game induces a transient state of heightened emotional susceptibility, potentially prompting individuals to embark on unconventional cyber searches, including the intriguing impulse to 'report UFO sighting'. In a twist that would make Carl Sagan smirk, our statistical analysis suggests a fusion of the earthly and the extraterrestrial during moments of heightened sports-related fervor. It's as if the cosmic spectator silently monitors humanity's pursuits, waiting for the opportune moment to intersect the mundane with the enigmatic.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.6334511 serves as a galactic testament to the harmony between these seemingly disparate realms of human curiosity, while the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 injects a cosmic touch of mystery into this enthralling statistical soiree. The r-squared of 0.4012603 serves as a mathematical ode to the cosmic embrace between the heart-stopping drama of a closely contested baseball victory and the mystical allure of potential extraterrestrial encounters, reminiscent of a celestial tango unfolding amidst the earthly scoreboard.

Our findings, akin to a whimsical expedition into the statistical unknown, evoke a sense of cosmic whimsy, urging researchers to embark on an unconventional journey into the statistical cosmos. As we embrace the statistical unknown, it becomes increasingly clear that in the world of data and analysis, there is room for a bit of cosmic charm, a statistical joie de vivre that transcends the mundane, embracing the eccentricity of the cosmic and the terrestrial in equal measure.

In essence, our statistical odyssey not only reinforces the bond between sports outcomes and inexplicable queries related to UFO sightings but also beckons researchers to gaze into the statistical cosmos with a playful spirit and a curiosity that reaches beyond the bounds of traditional research paradigms. It seems that in the cosmic spectrum of statistical analysis, the entwining of the cosmic and the terrestrial beckons us to adapt our statistical lenses to accommodate the surreal and the unorthodox, reminding us that statistical inquiry is not just about data points and regressions—it's about unearthing the cosmic connections that underpin the enigmatic tapestry of human behavior.

In summary, our findings nudge the traditional boundaries of statistical inquiry, encouraging researchers to embark on cosmic odysseys that defy the conventional and embrace the serendipitous, the capricious, and the inexplicably magnificent. As we bring this statistical soiree to a momentary pause, we invite fellow researchers to join us in this cosmic exploration, wielding the statistical compass to navigate the nebulous realms of human curiosity, and perhaps, stumble upon statistically significant celestial phenomena that have eluded our earthly gaze.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"World Series Score Difference and UFO Sightings: A Statistical Odyssey"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this inexplicably intriguing study, we delve into the curious connection between the nail-biting score difference in the final game of the World Series and the penchant for individuals to conduct surreptitious searches for 'report UFO sighting' on Google. Our intrepid research team, armed with data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, observed patterns spanning from 2004 to 2022 and identified a correlation coefficient of 0.6334511, with a robustly significant p-value of less than 0.01. Could it be that when the baseball tension reaches its zenith, the atmospheric curiosity for extraterrestrial sightings also hits a home run? Join us in this statistical odyssey as we unravel this peculiar phenomenon and shed light on an otherworldly aspect of sports-related fervor.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Through the annals of statistical research, numerous inexplicable connections have been probed and pondered, from the correlation between the number of Nicolas Cage movies released and the number of swimming pool drownings to the link between the consumption of cheese and the likelihood of dying tangled in bed-sheets (yes, that's a real study!). However, in the grand tapestry of peculiar statistical associations, there's a new player in town - the connection between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the fervent quest for extraterrestrial encounters, as indicated by Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'.
The purpose of our study is not just to unearth a mere statistical correlation but to embark on a whimsical odyssey to uncover the underlying mechanisms that tie the thrill of baseball showdowns to the urge to report Unidentified Flying Objects. What prompts individuals, quivering with the vicarious adrenaline rush from a high-stakes, game-ending maneuver, to suddenly pivot to the cosmic realm of UFO sightings on the internet?
Now, before you raise an eyebrow quizzically like a skeptical alien encountering Earth's perplexing customs, let's address the pink elephant in the room - the enduring question of causation versus mere correlation. Are we suggesting that a close baseball game directly causes an upsurge in UFO sightings, or are we merely witnessing a serendipitous statistical dance of unrelated phenomena? Fear not, dear reader; we shall tread this statistically treacherous terrain with cautious optimism and a whimsical sense of humor.
In this quintessentially quirky pursuit, we shall harness the power of data, diving into the rich repositories of World Series score differentials and Google Trends search indices. From the exhilarating highs of 2004's Red Sox triumph to the nail-biting moments of recent years, our statistical compass shall navigate the choppy seas of game unpredictability and UFO enthusiasm.
So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a wild statistical ride as we explore this fantastical combination of America's favorite pastime and humanity's enduring wonderment with the great unknown. Let the games – and UFO sightings – begin!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study sent us on a captivating statistical journey, unlocking a correlation coefficient of 0.6334511 and an r-squared of 0.4012603 between the nail-biting score difference in the final game of the World Series and the clandestine pursuit of information on reporting UFO sightings. This correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, left us in awe of the intriguing link between two seemingly disparate realms of human curiosity.
Fig. 1 illustrates this captivating relationship, presenting a scatterplot brimming with data points that mirror the cosmic dance between the heart-stopping drama of a closely contested baseball victory and the mystical allure of potential extraterrestrial encounters. It is as if our statistical analysis has discovered an intergalactic union, a celestial tango hidden within the annals of baseball history.
The robust correlation coefficient of 0.6334511 evokes the image of two celestial bodies aligning in perfect harmony, while the r-squared of 0.4012603 encapsulates the dynamic interplay between these seemingly unrelated variables with a cosmic embrace. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 adds a touch of mystery to this intriguing statistical soiree, leaving us pondering whether there is, in fact, a cosmic force at play in the realm of sports and extraterrestrial fascination.
Our findings evoke a whimsical wonder, sparking curiosity akin to an eccentric celestial expedition into the statistical unknown. Could it be that in the throes of a nail-biting final game, as tension mounts and hearts race, the human spirit reaches out to embrace the cosmic, searching for answers that transcend the earthly confines of sports?
This statistical odyssey not only sheds light on the captivating connection between seemingly unrelated human curiosities but also beckons researchers to gaze into the statistical cosmos with a playful spirit and a curiosity that reaches beyond the bounds of traditional research paradigms. Our findings beckon others to join us in this quest to uncover the hidden statistical forces that guide human behavior, reminding us that even in the world of data and analysis, there is room for a bit of cosmic whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our statistical escapade into the enigmatic realm of World Series score differentials and clandestine Google searches for UFO sightings has left us astronomers of statistical anomalies. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.6334511 between these seemingly unrelated phenomena has cast a cosmic glow on the statistical landscape, reminiscent of a celestial salsa between the allure of baseball triumph and the cosmic quest for extraterrestrial encounters.

Our findings invite us to ponder the whimsical ways in which human curiosity traverses the cosmic and the commonplace, akin to a statistical meteor shower illuminating the unexplored corners of human fascination. The r-squared of 0.4012603 encapsulates the dance of these variables like cosmic bodies revolving in a statistical ballet, while the p-value of less than 0.01 adds a touch of cosmic mystery to this statistical soiree, reminiscent of the enigmatic allure of the unidentified flying objects themselves.

As we hang our statistical hats on this exhilarating odyssey, we are compelled to spare a moment for a quirky chuckle at the cosmic spectacle unfolding before our analytical eyes. The statistical cosmos, it seems, is not immune to the mischievous play of variables, where the earthly drama of a baseball contest can trigger a cosmic curiosity that transcends the bounds of the ordinary.

With our heads held high and our statistical compasses pointing toward the great unknown, we assert that the pursuit of further elucidation in this enthralling association is akin to searching for a statistical needle in a galactic haystack. Therefore, we dare to declare, with a cosmic twinkle in our statistical eyes, that no further research is necessary in this cosmic statistical odyssey.

So, let us raise a figurative toast to the interplay of statistical forces that guide human wanderings between the earthly excitement of sports championships and the cosmic yearning for extraterrestrial encounters. Our statistical journey may be at its cosmic conclusion, but the quirky, statistical tapestry of human intrigue continues to unfold, beckoning us to embrace the whimsical mysteries that make statistical exploration a truly cosmic adventure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited World Series Score Difference and UFO Sightings: A Statistical Odyssey. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Extraterrestrial Statistics and Sports Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited World Series Score Difference and UFO Sightings: A Statistical Odyssey. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Extraterrestrial Data Analysis and Baseball Statistics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled World Series Score Difference and UFO Sightings: A Statistical Odyssey with an abstract of In this inexplicably intriguing study, we delve into the curious connection between the nail-biting score difference in the final game of the World Series and the penchant for individuals to conduct surreptitious searches for 'report UFO sighting' on Google. Our intrepid research team, armed with data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, observed patterns spanning from 2004 to 2022 and identified a correlation coefficient of 0.6334511, with a robustly significant p-value of less than 0.01. Could it be that when the baseball tension reaches its zenith, the atmospheric curiosity for extraterrestrial sightings also hits a home run? Join us in this statistical odyssey as we unravel this peculiar phenomenon and shed light on an otherworldly aspect of sports-related fervor.

ChatGPT:

World Series, score difference, final game, UFO sightings, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, Google Trends, data analysis, baseball tension, atmospheric curiosity, extraterrestrial sightings

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series
Detailed data title: Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series

Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'

Correlation r = 0.6334511 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4012603 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 40.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'report UFO sighting') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0036. 0.0035944814574378730000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.63 in 0.36% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 278 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.25, 0.84 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series (Score difference)4434323142131131222
Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' (Rel. search volume)18.666712.416713.259.833339.1666710.416711.83338.166676.55.416673.916675.333333.52.833333.583334.4166744.53.16667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4,4,3,4,3,2,3,1,4,2,1,3,1,1,3,1,2,2,2,])
array_2 = np.array([18.6667,12.4167,13.25,9.83333,9.16667,10.4167,11.8333,8.16667,6.5,5.41667,3.91667,5.33333,3.5,2.83333,3.58333,4.41667,4,4.5,3.16667,])
array_1_name = "Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2506 · Black Variable ID: 107 · Red Variable ID: 1392
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0