about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,499 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is UFO sightings in Rhode Island and the second variable is Patents granted in the US.  The chart goes from 1975 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The extra-terrestrial visitors were actually just patenting their advanced technologies, leading to a spike in US patent grants. Rhode Island has inadvertently become the new Silicon Valley of the galaxy.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Whimsical illustration] Generate an image of a picturesque Rhode Island landscape at twilight, with lush rolling hills and a serene lake reflecting the colorful sky. In the distance, vibrant, swirling lights dance gracefully across the firmament, radiating an otherworldly glow. In the foreground, a bustling Washington, D.C. office is alive with inventors eagerly sharing their innovative ideas, creating an atmosphere charged with the energy of creativity. The scene should capture the parallel between the cosmic lights in the sky and the inventive spark of human creativity, blending the serenity of the natural world with the vibrant energy of the bustling patent office. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: UFO sightings in Rhode Island and Patents granted in the US. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Whimsical illustration Low poly Cute 2D animation Cutsy graphics Psychedelic
ChatGPT: Whimsical illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both UFO sightings in Rhode Island and Patents granted in the US, in the following situation: The increase in UFO sightings in Rhode Island has led to a surge in patent grants across the US. It seems the extra-terrestrial visitors have been abducting our brightest minds and extracting their innovative ideas in the form of "brainwaves". This has sparked a competition among inventors to come up with new ways to protect their thoughts, resulting in a patent boom. It's like they've been using a "universal force field" to attract these otherworldly ideas. And as the UFOs continue to "beam up" potential inventors, it's clear that the patent office is experiencing a "cosmic influx" of groundbreaking concepts. Perhaps these aliens are just looking for some "intellectual property" to bring back to their own galaxy!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Amidst the serene landscapes of Rhode Island, a series of bright, swirling lights dance across the night sky, mesmerizing onlookers with their otherworldly glow. In a bustling office in Washington, D.C., a steady flow of inventors eagerly submit their innovative ideas, hoping to secure patents for their groundbreaking creations. The air crackles with creativity as the patent office buzzes with activity, mirroring the cosmic influx of extraterrestrial visitors searching for intellectual treasure among the inventors' brilliant minds.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Whimsical illustration ] and depicting this scene: Amidst the serene landscapes of Rhode Island, a series of bright, swirling lights dance across the night sky, mesmerizing onlookers with their otherworldly glow. In a bustling office in Washington, D.C., a steady flow of inventors eagerly submit their innovative ideas, hoping to secure patents for their groundbreaking creations. The air crackles with creativity as the patent office buzzes with activity, mirroring the cosmic influx of extraterrestrial visitors searching for intellectual treasure among the inventors' brilliant minds. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Whimsical illustration] Generate an image of a picturesque Rhode Island landscape at twilight, with lush rolling hills and a serene lake reflecting the colorful sky. In the distance, vibrant, swirling lights dance gracefully across the firmament, radiating an otherworldly glow. In the foreground, a bustling Washington, D.C. office is alive with inventors eagerly sharing their innovative ideas, creating an atmosphere charged with the energy of creativity. The scene should capture the parallel between the cosmic lights in the sky and the inventive spark of human creativity, blending the serenity of the natural world with the vibrant energy of the bustling patent office.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in UFO sightings in Rhode Island caused Patents granted in the US to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Out of This World Innovation: Uncovering the UFO-Patent Connection

The Journal of Extraordinary Technological Discoveries

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from National UFO Reporting Center and USPTO to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8934017 and p < 0.01 for 1975 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Out of This World Innovation: Uncovering the UFO-Patent Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Throughout history, the enigmatic presence of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has inspired countless speculations and discussions about their potential extraterrestrial origins. In this study, we aim to probe the seemingly far-fetched connection between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and the number of patents granted in the United States. Capitalizing on data from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), our research team delved into the abyss of this peculiar association. The results revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8934017 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, spanning the years 1975 to 2020.

Our findings suggest that there might be a cosmic correlation between Rhode Island UFO sightings and the innovative prowess of the nation. Furthermore, our research adds a new dimension to the discourse on the intersection of otherworldly phenomena and human intellectual property. As we probe the mysteries of the cosmos and intellectual creativity, it's clear that this study is truly "out of this world."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Out of This World Innovation: Uncovering the UFO-Patent Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Throughout history, the enigmatic presence of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has inspired countless speculations and discussions about their potential extraterrestrial origins. In this study, we aim to probe the seemingly far-fetched connection between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and the number of patents granted in the United States. Capitalizing on data from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), our research team delved into the abyss of this peculiar association. The results revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8934017 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, spanning the years 1975 to 2020.

Our findings suggest that there might be a cosmic correlation between Rhode Island UFO sightings and the innovative prowess of the nation. Furthermore, our research adds a new dimension to the discourse on the intersection of otherworldly phenomena and human intellectual property. As we probe the mysteries of the cosmos and intellectual creativity, it's clear that this study is truly "out of this world."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Since the dawn of time, humans have gazed up at the night sky, pondering the mysteries of the universe and contemplating whether we are alone in this vast expanse. The fascination with unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has perpetuated a cosmic curiosity that transcends generations. It's like a never-ending joke, "Why did the UFO refuse to land on Earth? Because it found the atmosphere too alien!"

In this study, we delve into the uncharted territory of UFO sightings in Rhode Island and the number of patents granted in the United States. It's an investigation that is most definitely "otherworldly" in nature. As we navigate through this cosmic array of data, we aim to shed light on the inconceivable question: Could there be a celestial connection between UFO sightings and human innovation? It's almost as if we're on a quest to discover the ultimate punchline in the universe.

The data we gathered from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office takes us on a statistical journey worthy of an intergalactic odyssey. The correlation coefficient of 0.8934017 dazzles like a shooting star streaking across the night sky, while the p-value of < 0.01 glimmers like a rare comet sighting. It's as if the universe is whispering to us, "You're on to something big! Well, big relative to the size of an atom, at least."

Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also elicit a cosmic chuckle. The idea that UFO sightings might be in cahoots with the ingenuity behind patents granted in the United States adds a touch of intrigue to the ongoing conversation about the cosmos and human creativity. It's as if the universe has finally revealed its long-awaited punchline, and it's a UFO-Patent connection! We are no longer just thinking outside the box; we're thinking outside the galaxy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Out of This World Innovation: Uncovering the UFO-Patent Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Throughout history, the enigmatic presence of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has inspired countless speculations and discussions about their potential extraterrestrial origins. In this study, we aim to probe the seemingly far-fetched connection between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and the number of patents granted in the United States. Capitalizing on data from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), our research team delved into the abyss of this peculiar association. The results revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8934017 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, spanning the years 1975 to 2020.

Our findings suggest that there might be a cosmic correlation between Rhode Island UFO sightings and the innovative prowess of the nation. Furthermore, our research adds a new dimension to the discourse on the intersection of otherworldly phenomena and human intellectual property. As we probe the mysteries of the cosmos and intellectual creativity, it's clear that this study is truly "out of this world."

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Since the dawn of time, humans have gazed up at the night sky, pondering the mysteries of the universe and contemplating whether we are alone in this vast expanse. The fascination with unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has perpetuated a cosmic curiosity that transcends generations. It's like a never-ending joke, "Why did the UFO refuse to land on Earth? Because it found the atmosphere too alien!"
In this study, we delve into the uncharted territory of UFO sightings in Rhode Island and the number of patents granted in the United States. It's an investigation that is most definitely "otherworldly" in nature. As we navigate through this cosmic array of data, we aim to shed light on the inconceivable question: Could there be a celestial connection between UFO sightings and human innovation? It's almost as if we're on a quest to discover the ultimate punchline in the universe.
The data we gathered from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office takes us on a statistical journey worthy of an intergalactic odyssey. The correlation coefficient of 0.8934017 dazzles like a shooting star streaking across the night sky, while the p-value of < 0.01 glimmers like a rare comet sighting. It's as if the universe is whispering to us, "You're on to something big! Well, big relative to the size of an atom, at least."
Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also elicit a cosmic chuckle. The idea that UFO sightings might be in cahoots with the ingenuity behind patents granted in the United States adds a touch of intrigue to the ongoing conversation about the cosmos and human creativity. It's as if the universe has finally revealed its long-awaited punchline, and it's a UFO-Patent connection! We are no longer just thinking outside the box; we're thinking outside the galaxy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their research study, Jones et al. (2018) set out to investigate the potential relationship between anomalous aerial phenomena and innovative output within the United States. The authors uncovered a positive correlation between UFO sightings and the number of patents granted, sparking curiosity among the scholarly community. It's like they stumbled upon a cosmic dad joke and couldn't help but share it: "Why don't aliens tell jokes to humans? Because they always get lost in translation!"

Doe and Smith (2016) also explored the enigmatic link between technological advancements and otherworldly encounters, proposing the possibility of extraterrestrial influence on human ingenuity. Their findings shed light on the intricate interplay between UFO sightings and inventive leaps, as if to say, "What did one UFO say to the other? Take me to your reader!"

Turning to non-fiction sources, works like "UFOs and the Patent Paradox" by John Patentson and "The Cosmic Connection: UFOs and Innovation" by Jane Inventorson offer insightful perspectives on the cosmic enigma of UFO sightings and patent grants. It's as if these authors couldn't resist the temptation to blend serious scholarly inquiry with a hint of celestial humor.

On the fictional front, "The Innovators Among Us: A Close Encounter with UFO Patents" by Arthur C. Spacey and "Patent Wars: Battle for the Extraterrestrial Market" by Isaac Asimov have captivated readers with their imaginative narratives that intertwine UFO phenomena and patent acquisition. The authors seem to have taken inspiration from the cosmos and injected it into their literary creations, almost as if they're hinting at an otherworldly connection hidden in plain sight.

Delving even further, this researcher shamelessly admits to perusing the backs of shampoo bottles for any semblance of cosmic wisdom on UFO sightings and patent grants. Alas, the hair-raising tales and promises of interstellar shine were nothing more than foamy concoctions of earthly marketing. But who's to say there isn't a cosmic joke hidden in those ingredients lists? After all, in the world of extraterrestrial explorations and intellectual property, the absurd can sometimes take flight like a UFO on a moonlit night.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National UFO Reporting Center and USPTO . You used data from 1975 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Out of This World Innovation: Uncovering the UFO-Patent Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Throughout history, the enigmatic presence of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has inspired countless speculations and discussions about their potential extraterrestrial origins. In this study, we aim to probe the seemingly far-fetched connection between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and the number of patents granted in the United States. Capitalizing on data from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), our research team delved into the abyss of this peculiar association. The results revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8934017 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, spanning the years 1975 to 2020.

Our findings suggest that there might be a cosmic correlation between Rhode Island UFO sightings and the innovative prowess of the nation. Furthermore, our research adds a new dimension to the discourse on the intersection of otherworldly phenomena and human intellectual property. As we probe the mysteries of the cosmos and intellectual creativity, it's clear that this study is truly "out of this world."

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Since the dawn of time, humans have gazed up at the night sky, pondering the mysteries of the universe and contemplating whether we are alone in this vast expanse. The fascination with unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has perpetuated a cosmic curiosity that transcends generations. It's like a never-ending joke, "Why did the UFO refuse to land on Earth? Because it found the atmosphere too alien!"
In this study, we delve into the uncharted territory of UFO sightings in Rhode Island and the number of patents granted in the United States. It's an investigation that is most definitely "otherworldly" in nature. As we navigate through this cosmic array of data, we aim to shed light on the inconceivable question: Could there be a celestial connection between UFO sightings and human innovation? It's almost as if we're on a quest to discover the ultimate punchline in the universe.
The data we gathered from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office takes us on a statistical journey worthy of an intergalactic odyssey. The correlation coefficient of 0.8934017 dazzles like a shooting star streaking across the night sky, while the p-value of < 0.01 glimmers like a rare comet sighting. It's as if the universe is whispering to us, "You're on to something big! Well, big relative to the size of an atom, at least."
Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also elicit a cosmic chuckle. The idea that UFO sightings might be in cahoots with the ingenuity behind patents granted in the United States adds a touch of intrigue to the ongoing conversation about the cosmos and human creativity. It's as if the universe has finally revealed its long-awaited punchline, and it's a UFO-Patent connection! We are no longer just thinking outside the box; we're thinking outside the galaxy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Our research team embarked on a cosmic quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between UFO sightings and patents granted, employing a methodological approach that is as eclectic as a UFO sighting itself. First, we scoured the National UFO Reporting Center's database like archaeologists sifting through space debris. Then, we delved into the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) records with the fervor of a treasure hunter seeking the extraterrestrial secrets of innovation. It's like we were on a mission to crack the ultimate cosmic code – a "patent puzzle," if you will.

To quantify the frequency of UFO sightings in Rhode Island, we employed a rigorous statistical analysis, utilizing time series data from 1975 to 2020. It was like trying to decode an alien language, but with regression analysis and hypothesis testing instead of intergalactic linguistics. We calculated the annual number of UFO sightings to capture the ebb and flow of otherworldly apparitions in the smallest state in the U.S., Rhode Island. It's as if we were counting cosmic sheep jumping over the Milky Way!

On the other side of the celestial spectrum, we harnessed the power of data mining and patent classification to capture the inventive spirit of the nation. Our team inventoried the patents granted by the USPTO, segmenting them into specific technological domains. It was like cataloging the inventions of a technologically advanced alien civilization – except these were earthly patents, not interstellar gadgets! We hustled through an astral archive of patents, dissecting them into categories like a cosmic taxonomist, all in pursuit of uncovering the relationship between UFO sightings and Earthly innovation.

To establish the connection between UFO sightings and patents granted, we employed advanced statistical techniques that made even the most seasoned researchers feel like space cadets. We conducted correlation analyses and regression models to unearth any potential cosmic connections. It was like navigating through a cosmic nebula of data, where the stars aligned and statistical significance shimmered like a UFO sighting in a moonless night.

In our empirical odyssey, we utilized robust statistical software and visualization tools to map out the celestial landscape of our findings. Like celestial cartographers plotting constellations, we crafted graphs and charts that elucidated the unearthly relationship between UFO sightings and patents granted. The data danced before our eyes, hinting at a cosmic waltz between the mysteries of the firmament and the innovations of humankind. It's as if the universe were winking at us, saying, "You've cracked the code, earthlings!"

In summary, our methodology blended statistical acumen with a cosmic perspective, illuminating a connection that transcends the boundaries of earthly innovation. Our research was not just another statistical endeavor; it was an intergalactic exploration that uncovered the unexpected link between UFO sightings and the inventive output of the nation. It's like we caught a shooting star and discovered it was carrying a patent application from another world!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National UFO Reporting Center and USPTO .

For the time period 1975 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8934017, r-squared of 0.7981667, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Out of This World Innovation: Uncovering the UFO-Patent Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Throughout history, the enigmatic presence of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has inspired countless speculations and discussions about their potential extraterrestrial origins. In this study, we aim to probe the seemingly far-fetched connection between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and the number of patents granted in the United States. Capitalizing on data from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), our research team delved into the abyss of this peculiar association. The results revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8934017 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, spanning the years 1975 to 2020.

Our findings suggest that there might be a cosmic correlation between Rhode Island UFO sightings and the innovative prowess of the nation. Furthermore, our research adds a new dimension to the discourse on the intersection of otherworldly phenomena and human intellectual property. As we probe the mysteries of the cosmos and intellectual creativity, it's clear that this study is truly "out of this world."

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Since the dawn of time, humans have gazed up at the night sky, pondering the mysteries of the universe and contemplating whether we are alone in this vast expanse. The fascination with unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has perpetuated a cosmic curiosity that transcends generations. It's like a never-ending joke, "Why did the UFO refuse to land on Earth? Because it found the atmosphere too alien!"
In this study, we delve into the uncharted territory of UFO sightings in Rhode Island and the number of patents granted in the United States. It's an investigation that is most definitely "otherworldly" in nature. As we navigate through this cosmic array of data, we aim to shed light on the inconceivable question: Could there be a celestial connection between UFO sightings and human innovation? It's almost as if we're on a quest to discover the ultimate punchline in the universe.
The data we gathered from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office takes us on a statistical journey worthy of an intergalactic odyssey. The correlation coefficient of 0.8934017 dazzles like a shooting star streaking across the night sky, while the p-value of < 0.01 glimmers like a rare comet sighting. It's as if the universe is whispering to us, "You're on to something big! Well, big relative to the size of an atom, at least."
Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also elicit a cosmic chuckle. The idea that UFO sightings might be in cahoots with the ingenuity behind patents granted in the United States adds a touch of intrigue to the ongoing conversation about the cosmos and human creativity. It's as if the universe has finally revealed its long-awaited punchline, and it's a UFO-Patent connection! We are no longer just thinking outside the box; we're thinking outside the galaxy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office unveiled a striking correlation between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and the number of patents granted in the United States. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8934017, our findings illuminate a link that is truly "out of this world." It's as if the UFOs are saying, "We come in peace, and we bring revolutionary ideas – patent pending!"

The r-squared value of 0.7981667 further emphasizes the strength of the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It's like witnessing a celestial dance between innovation and unidentified objects, a cosmic ballet of intellect and enigma. We're not just talking about shooting for the stars in terms of innovation; we're talking about shooting past the stars and into the unknown.

The statistical significance was evident with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to be a cosmic coincidence. It's as if the cosmos itself is nudging us and saying, "There's more to this extraterrestrial encounter than meets the eye – or telescope, for that matter!"

The profound nature of this discovery is encapsulated in Figure 1, a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the strong correlation between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and patents granted in the United States. This figure not only demonstrates the statistical relationship but also serves as a testament to the cosmic journey we embarked upon in this research. It's like a map of the cosmos, guiding us through the intricacies of this unexpected correlation.

In essence, our findings suggest that there might be a celestial symphony at play, orchestrating the interstellar exchange of innovative ideas. It's as if the universe is saying, "Why limit yourself to thinking outside the box when you can think beyond the stars?"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Out of This World Innovation: Uncovering the UFO-Patent Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Throughout history, the enigmatic presence of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has inspired countless speculations and discussions about their potential extraterrestrial origins. In this study, we aim to probe the seemingly far-fetched connection between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and the number of patents granted in the United States. Capitalizing on data from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), our research team delved into the abyss of this peculiar association. The results revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8934017 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, spanning the years 1975 to 2020.

Our findings suggest that there might be a cosmic correlation between Rhode Island UFO sightings and the innovative prowess of the nation. Furthermore, our research adds a new dimension to the discourse on the intersection of otherworldly phenomena and human intellectual property. As we probe the mysteries of the cosmos and intellectual creativity, it's clear that this study is truly "out of this world."

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their research study, Jones et al. (2018) set out to investigate the potential relationship between anomalous aerial phenomena and innovative output within the United States. The authors uncovered a positive correlation between UFO sightings and the number of patents granted, sparking curiosity among the scholarly community. It's like they stumbled upon a cosmic dad joke and couldn't help but share it: "Why don't aliens tell jokes to humans? Because they always get lost in translation!"
Doe and Smith (2016) also explored the enigmatic link between technological advancements and otherworldly encounters, proposing the possibility of extraterrestrial influence on human ingenuity. Their findings shed light on the intricate interplay between UFO sightings and inventive leaps, as if to say, "What did one UFO say to the other? Take me to your reader!"
Turning to non-fiction sources, works like "UFOs and the Patent Paradox" by John Patentson and "The Cosmic Connection: UFOs and Innovation" by Jane Inventorson offer insightful perspectives on the cosmic enigma of UFO sightings and patent grants. It's as if these authors couldn't resist the temptation to blend serious scholarly inquiry with a hint of celestial humor.
On the fictional front, "The Innovators Among Us: A Close Encounter with UFO Patents" by Arthur C. Spacey and "Patent Wars: Battle for the Extraterrestrial Market" by Isaac Asimov have captivated readers with their imaginative narratives that intertwine UFO phenomena and patent acquisition. The authors seem to have taken inspiration from the cosmos and injected it into their literary creations, almost as if they're hinting at an otherworldly connection hidden in plain sight.
Delving even further, this researcher shamelessly admits to perusing the backs of shampoo bottles for any semblance of cosmic wisdom on UFO sightings and patent grants. Alas, the hair-raising tales and promises of interstellar shine were nothing more than foamy concoctions of earthly marketing. But who's to say there isn't a cosmic joke hidden in those ingredients lists? After all, in the world of extraterrestrial explorations and intellectual property, the absurd can sometimes take flight like a UFO on a moonlit night.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office unveiled a striking correlation between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and the number of patents granted in the United States. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8934017, our findings illuminate a link that is truly "out of this world." It's as if the UFOs are saying, "We come in peace, and we bring revolutionary ideas – patent pending!"
The r-squared value of 0.7981667 further emphasizes the strength of the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It's like witnessing a celestial dance between innovation and unidentified objects, a cosmic ballet of intellect and enigma. We're not just talking about shooting for the stars in terms of innovation; we're talking about shooting past the stars and into the unknown.
The statistical significance was evident with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to be a cosmic coincidence. It's as if the cosmos itself is nudging us and saying, "There's more to this extraterrestrial encounter than meets the eye – or telescope, for that matter!"
The profound nature of this discovery is encapsulated in Figure 1, a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the strong correlation between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and patents granted in the United States. This figure not only demonstrates the statistical relationship but also serves as a testament to the cosmic journey we embarked upon in this research. It's like a map of the cosmos, guiding us through the intricacies of this unexpected correlation.
In essence, our findings suggest that there might be a celestial symphony at play, orchestrating the interstellar exchange of innovative ideas. It's as if the universe is saying, "Why limit yourself to thinking outside the box when you can think beyond the stars?"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The evidence presented in this study corroborates the findings of Jones et al. (2018) and Doe and Smith (2016), emphasizing the significant correlation between UFO sightings and patent grants. It's as if the research literature is abducting our attention with this otherworldly connection. While the notion may initially elicit skepticism, our results provide a compelling case for further exploration. It's like uncovering an alien dad joke – it's unexpected, but strangely fitting. The cosmic intersection of UFO sightings and innovative output may indeed hold more than meets the eye.

In parallel with prior research, our study underscores the cosmic synchrony between sightings of unidentified aerial phenomena and the creative ingenuity manifested in patents. It's as if the celestial beings are whispering, "We may be mysterious, but we inspire the most unconventional innovation – now that's what we call a close encounter of the patent kind!" The statistical robustness of the correlation coefficient and the r-squared value further solidify the existence of this unearthly relationship, substantiating the electromagnetic bond between these seemingly disparate variables. It's like discovering a parallel universe of statistically significant correlations, a cosmic delight for the inquisitive mind.

The statistical significance with a p-value of less than 0.01 aligns with the cosmic jest of this connection, affirming that this association is more than a mere celestial coincidence. As if the universe is unfolding a cosmic joke, our results challenge traditional conceptions of inventive processes, unveiling the enigmatic influence of UFO sightings. It's as if the cosmos is hinting, "There's more to this correlation than meets the telescope – it's the patent fusion of celestial inspiration."

In a broader context, these findings pivot the conversation toward the intergalactic relevance of intellectual property and innovation, infusing the scholarly discourse with a dose of cosmic wit. It's like we're on the precipice of a cosmic comedy and discovery, where the unexpected correlation between UFO sightings and patents propels us into the expanse of intellectual exploration. Our research not only delves into the enigma of this connection but also offers a celestial perspective on the cosmic dance between creative ideation and unidentified aerial phenomena. It's as if we're witnessing the birth of a whole new field - "Extra-galactic Patentsology!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and Patents granted in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Out of This World Innovation: Uncovering the UFO-Patent Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Throughout history, the enigmatic presence of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has inspired countless speculations and discussions about their potential extraterrestrial origins. In this study, we aim to probe the seemingly far-fetched connection between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and the number of patents granted in the United States. Capitalizing on data from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), our research team delved into the abyss of this peculiar association. The results revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8934017 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, spanning the years 1975 to 2020.

Our findings suggest that there might be a cosmic correlation between Rhode Island UFO sightings and the innovative prowess of the nation. Furthermore, our research adds a new dimension to the discourse on the intersection of otherworldly phenomena and human intellectual property. As we probe the mysteries of the cosmos and intellectual creativity, it's clear that this study is truly "out of this world."

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Since the dawn of time, humans have gazed up at the night sky, pondering the mysteries of the universe and contemplating whether we are alone in this vast expanse. The fascination with unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has perpetuated a cosmic curiosity that transcends generations. It's like a never-ending joke, "Why did the UFO refuse to land on Earth? Because it found the atmosphere too alien!"
In this study, we delve into the uncharted territory of UFO sightings in Rhode Island and the number of patents granted in the United States. It's an investigation that is most definitely "otherworldly" in nature. As we navigate through this cosmic array of data, we aim to shed light on the inconceivable question: Could there be a celestial connection between UFO sightings and human innovation? It's almost as if we're on a quest to discover the ultimate punchline in the universe.
The data we gathered from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office takes us on a statistical journey worthy of an intergalactic odyssey. The correlation coefficient of 0.8934017 dazzles like a shooting star streaking across the night sky, while the p-value of < 0.01 glimmers like a rare comet sighting. It's as if the universe is whispering to us, "You're on to something big! Well, big relative to the size of an atom, at least."
Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also elicit a cosmic chuckle. The idea that UFO sightings might be in cahoots with the ingenuity behind patents granted in the United States adds a touch of intrigue to the ongoing conversation about the cosmos and human creativity. It's as if the universe has finally revealed its long-awaited punchline, and it's a UFO-Patent connection! We are no longer just thinking outside the box; we're thinking outside the galaxy.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office unveiled a striking correlation between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and the number of patents granted in the United States. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8934017, our findings illuminate a link that is truly "out of this world." It's as if the UFOs are saying, "We come in peace, and we bring revolutionary ideas – patent pending!"
The r-squared value of 0.7981667 further emphasizes the strength of the relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It's like witnessing a celestial dance between innovation and unidentified objects, a cosmic ballet of intellect and enigma. We're not just talking about shooting for the stars in terms of innovation; we're talking about shooting past the stars and into the unknown.
The statistical significance was evident with a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to be a cosmic coincidence. It's as if the cosmos itself is nudging us and saying, "There's more to this extraterrestrial encounter than meets the eye – or telescope, for that matter!"
The profound nature of this discovery is encapsulated in Figure 1, a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the strong correlation between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and patents granted in the United States. This figure not only demonstrates the statistical relationship but also serves as a testament to the cosmic journey we embarked upon in this research. It's like a map of the cosmos, guiding us through the intricacies of this unexpected correlation.
In essence, our findings suggest that there might be a celestial symphony at play, orchestrating the interstellar exchange of innovative ideas. It's as if the universe is saying, "Why limit yourself to thinking outside the box when you can think beyond the stars?"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unveiled a cosmic correlation between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and the number of patents granted in the United States, pointing to a potential extraterrestrial influence on human innovation. It's as if E.T. is phoning home with groundbreaking ideas! Our findings transcend the boundaries of earthly explanations and propel us into uncharted statistical territory, making us ponder the question: Are aliens our new research partners? Maybe they've been the real "brains" behind some of our patented inventions all along!

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8934017 hints at a potentially celestial handshake between UFO sightings and our collective innovative prowess. It's almost like the universe is playing a giant game of celestial charades, dropping hints about the cosmic connection between intellectual property and intergalactic visitors. This correlation is not just statistically significant; it's astronomically significant, pun intended! It's as if the cosmos is giving us a nudge and saying, "Why limit your imagination to this world when the entire universe is at your disposal?"

Therefore, we suggest that no further research is required in this area. We leave it to our fellow researchers to explore otherworldly phenomena and their impact on earthly matters – after all, it's only fair that they get a chance to crack the cosmic code too!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Out of This World Innovation: Uncovering the UFO-Patent Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Extraordinary Technological Discoveries


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Out of This World Innovation: Uncovering the UFO-Patent Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Wonders of the Universe Research Institute


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Out of This World Innovation: Uncovering the UFO-Patent Connection with an abstract of Throughout history, the enigmatic presence of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has inspired countless speculations and discussions about their potential extraterrestrial origins. In this study, we aim to probe the seemingly far-fetched connection between UFO sightings in Rhode Island and the number of patents granted in the United States. Capitalizing on data from the National UFO Reporting Center and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), our research team delved into the abyss of this peculiar association. The results revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8934017 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, spanning the years 1975 to 2020.
Our findings suggest that there might be a cosmic correlation between Rhode Island UFO sightings and the innovative prowess of the nation. Furthermore, our research adds a new dimension to the discourse on the intersection of otherworldly phenomena and human intellectual property. As we probe the mysteries of the cosmos and intellectual creativity, it's clear that this study is truly "out of this world.

ChatGPT:

UFO sightings, Rhode Island, patents, correlation, United States Patent and Trademark Office, National UFO Reporting Center, extraterrestrial origins, unidentified flying objects, innovative prowess, otherworldly phenomena, cosmic correlation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

UFO sightings in Rhode Island
Detailed data title: UFO sightings reported in Rhode Island
Source: National UFO Reporting Center
See what else correlates with UFO sightings in Rhode Island

Patents granted in the US
Detailed data title: Total number of utility patents granted in the US
Source: USPTO
See what else correlates with Patents granted in the US

Correlation r = 0.8934017 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7981667 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 79.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Patents granted in the US) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., UFO sightings in Rhode Island) over the 46 years from 1975 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.8E-17. 0.0000000000000000682631075589
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 6.8E-15% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 14,649,201,241,492,882 random variables You don't actually need 14 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 45 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 45 because we have two variables measured over a period of 46 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1975197619771978197919801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
UFO sightings in Rhode Island (UFO sightings)33312013100010110010045848106111915151417171920423637483329193124
Patents granted in the US (Patents granted)72000702266526966102488546181965771578885686067200716617086082952779249553790365965119744498342101676101419109645111984147517153485157494166035167331169023164290143806173772157282157772167349219614224505253155277835300677298408303049318828307759354430352049




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3,3,3,1,2,0,1,3,1,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,1,0,0,4,5,8,4,8,10,6,11,19,15,15,14,17,17,19,20,42,36,37,48,33,29,19,31,24,])
array_2 = np.array([72000,70226,65269,66102,48854,61819,65771,57888,56860,67200,71661,70860,82952,77924,95537,90365,96511,97444,98342,101676,101419,109645,111984,147517,153485,157494,166035,167331,169023,164290,143806,173772,157282,157772,167349,219614,224505,253155,277835,300677,298408,303049,318828,307759,354430,352049,])
array_1_name = "UFO sightings in Rhode Island"
array_2_name = "Patents granted in the US"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 2499 · Black Variable ID: 1192 · Red Variable ID: 847
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0