about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,481 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Khalil and the second variable is Solar power generated in Laos.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

It turns out, every time someone named Khalil is born, a secret organization in Laos known as the Solar Khalil Syndicate springs into action. These individuals, all inexplicably named Khalil, have a natural affinity for harnessing solar energy. As their numbers grow, so does the collective knowledge and expertise in solar power technology. It's a sunny side effect of sharing a name, leading to a radiant revolution in Laotian solar power production. Who would have thought that the key to a brighter, sunnier future lay in the name Khalil?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image inspired by a TIME magazine cover, showing a group of children named Khalil dancing joyfully in Laos. They are encircled by solar panels, beaming with the sun's energy. In the center, a vibrant karaoke machine powered by the solar panels fills the scene with lively tunes, as the children celebrate the harnessing of solar power. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Khalil and Solar power generated in Laos. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cubism Voxel art a funny image you would see on reddit A TIME magazine cover image Cubism
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Khalil and Solar power generated in Laos, in the following situation: As more kids named Khalil gained influence, they collectively developed a superhero alter ego named "Solar Khalil" who championed renewable energy in Laos with his solar-powered karaoke machine, inadvertently inspiring a nation-wide solar power movement fueled by catchy tunes and radiant dance parties.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A group of kids named Khalil are gathered in Laos, surrounded by solar panels. They stand in a circle, holding hands and dancing around a karaoke machine powered by the sun. The machine blasts out lively tunes as the kids cheer and the solar panels soak up the sun's energy, contributing to the nationwide solar power movement.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: A group of kids named Khalil are gathered in Laos, surrounded by solar panels. They stand in a circle, holding hands and dancing around a karaoke machine powered by the sun. The machine blasts out lively tunes as the kids cheer and the solar panels soak up the sun's energy, contributing to the nationwide solar power movement. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image inspired by a TIME magazine cover, showing a group of children named Khalil dancing joyfully in Laos. They are encircled by solar panels, beaming with the sun's energy. In the center, a vibrant karaoke machine powered by the solar panels fills the scene with lively tunes, as the children celebrate the harnessing of solar power.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Khalil caused Solar power generated in Laos to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Shocking Solar Connections: The Khalil Name Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Laos

The Journal of Solar Semantics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Khalil and Solar power generated in Laos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9899821 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Solar Connections: The Khalil Name Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Laos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing and somewhat baffling relationship between the popularity of the given name Khalil and the generation of solar power in the landlocked country of Laos. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we meticulously pored over names and kilowatts to uncover any hidden connections. Our team was shocked to discover a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9899821 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. While our findings may sound a tad bit sunny and unusual, they indubitably shed light on the whimsical world of nomenclature and renewable energy. This research paves the way for further investigation into the mystical forces that link given names with renewable energy sources, and could potentially spark humorous dinner party conversations for years to come.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Khalil and Solar power generated in Laos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Solar Connections: The Khalil Name Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Laos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing and somewhat baffling relationship between the popularity of the given name Khalil and the generation of solar power in the landlocked country of Laos. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we meticulously pored over names and kilowatts to uncover any hidden connections. Our team was shocked to discover a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9899821 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. While our findings may sound a tad bit sunny and unusual, they indubitably shed light on the whimsical world of nomenclature and renewable energy. This research paves the way for further investigation into the mystical forces that link given names with renewable energy sources, and could potentially spark humorous dinner party conversations for years to come.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The connection between human nomenclature and renewable energy has long been a source of mirth and bafflement. In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the curious case of the name Khalil and its unexpected correlation with solar power generation in the picturesque landscapes of Laos. Despite the initial skepticism that surrounded this investigation, our findings have sparked a surge of excitement in the scientific community—much like the sunrise igniting a solar panel on a crisp morning.

The notion that a seemingly arbitrary first name could have any bearing on the production of solar energy may appear as far-fetched as claiming that a physicist moonlights as a stand-up comedian. However, as we delved into the wealth of data available from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our team was struck by the uncanny level of correlation between the popularity of the name Khalil and the kilowatts generated by Laos' solar panels. It's as if statistical anomalies were lining up like photons in a solar cell—an unexpected and delightful occurrence indeed.

Drawing on our extensive expertise in statistical analysis, we meticulously scrutinized the data, leveraging a multitude of sophisticated methods to tease out any underlying relationships. To our astonishment, the correlation coefficient of 0.9899821 emerged unmistakably from the data, akin to a solar flare commanding attention in the vast expanse of space. This finding was accompanied by a p-value that glimmered as brightly as a well-positioned solar array, firmly establishing the significance of this correlation in a statistical sense.

Our study has the potential to illuminate not only the whimsical and endearing interplay between personal names and renewable energy, but also the importance of keeping an open mind when investigating seemingly improbable phenomena—a reminder as powerful as a bolt of lightning on a summer's day. This unconventional arena of linkages between human names and environmental factors invites us to peer through the lens of statistical analysis with a whimsical twinkle in our eye, transcending the mundane and venturing into uncharted territories of research and discovery.

Thus, this research endeavors to shed light on the unexpected connections that pepper the scientific landscape and to inspire an air of wonder and amusement in the pursuit of knowledge. With that in mind, we embark on this peculiar journey with zeal and a dash of lightheartedness, hoping to infuse the world of academia with a dose of levity that is as refreshing as an unexpected rain shower after an arid spell.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Khalil and Solar power generated in Laos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Solar Connections: The Khalil Name Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Laos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing and somewhat baffling relationship between the popularity of the given name Khalil and the generation of solar power in the landlocked country of Laos. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we meticulously pored over names and kilowatts to uncover any hidden connections. Our team was shocked to discover a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9899821 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. While our findings may sound a tad bit sunny and unusual, they indubitably shed light on the whimsical world of nomenclature and renewable energy. This research paves the way for further investigation into the mystical forces that link given names with renewable energy sources, and could potentially spark humorous dinner party conversations for years to come.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The connection between human nomenclature and renewable energy has long been a source of mirth and bafflement. In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the curious case of the name Khalil and its unexpected correlation with solar power generation in the picturesque landscapes of Laos. Despite the initial skepticism that surrounded this investigation, our findings have sparked a surge of excitement in the scientific community—much like the sunrise igniting a solar panel on a crisp morning.
The notion that a seemingly arbitrary first name could have any bearing on the production of solar energy may appear as far-fetched as claiming that a physicist moonlights as a stand-up comedian. However, as we delved into the wealth of data available from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our team was struck by the uncanny level of correlation between the popularity of the name Khalil and the kilowatts generated by Laos' solar panels. It's as if statistical anomalies were lining up like photons in a solar cell—an unexpected and delightful occurrence indeed.
Drawing on our extensive expertise in statistical analysis, we meticulously scrutinized the data, leveraging a multitude of sophisticated methods to tease out any underlying relationships. To our astonishment, the correlation coefficient of 0.9899821 emerged unmistakably from the data, akin to a solar flare commanding attention in the vast expanse of space. This finding was accompanied by a p-value that glimmered as brightly as a well-positioned solar array, firmly establishing the significance of this correlation in a statistical sense.
Our study has the potential to illuminate not only the whimsical and endearing interplay between personal names and renewable energy, but also the importance of keeping an open mind when investigating seemingly improbable phenomena—a reminder as powerful as a bolt of lightning on a summer's day. This unconventional arena of linkages between human names and environmental factors invites us to peer through the lens of statistical analysis with a whimsical twinkle in our eye, transcending the mundane and venturing into uncharted territories of research and discovery.
Thus, this research endeavors to shed light on the unexpected connections that pepper the scientific landscape and to inspire an air of wonder and amusement in the pursuit of knowledge. With that in mind, we embark on this peculiar journey with zeal and a dash of lightheartedness, hoping to infuse the world of academia with a dose of levity that is as refreshing as an unexpected rain shower after an arid spell.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the correlation between personal names and environmental factors is a relatively underexplored area, with most studies focusing on socio-economic and cultural associations. Despite the limited research in this field, our investigation has led us down a path both enlightening and amusing, akin to discovering a hidden treasure map leading to a pot of solar-powered gold.

Doe and Jones delve into the realm of renewable energy in "Journal of Solar Power," discussing the technical advancements and grid integration of solar power in various countries. However, they surprisingly overlook any mention of the potential influence of personal names on solar power generation—a missed opportunity, one might say, not unlike forgetting to bring sunscreen on a scorching day.

Moving beyond the academic realm, "Solar Energy for Dummies" by Renewable Energy Association provides a comprehensive overview of solar power applications, yet regrettably omits any mention of the whimsical influence of personal names on solar energy generation. It seems even a book for "dummies" might not be as thorough as one would hope, much like a solar eclipse unexpectedly occurring on a cloudy day.

In a different avenue, the works of fiction such as "Sunshine and Shadows" by Solaria Bright and "Power in the Palm of Your Hand" by Ray N. G. provide fictional narratives of solar power and its potential impact on characters named Khalil. While these literary offerings may not belong in the annals of scientific journals, they certainly spark the imagination and offer a delightful glimpse into the possibilities of combining personal names with renewable energy, much like a solar-powered carnival ride set against a backdrop of whimsy and wonder.

Turning to popular internet culture, memes such as "Solar Power Khalil" and "Name-Generated Energy" have emerged, humorously speculating on the potential of harnessing solar energy based on the popularity of the name Khalil. While these memes may be lighthearted in nature, they underscore the widespread intrigue and amusement surrounding the unexpected connection we have uncovered, creating a playful dialogue that rivals the sparkling banter of photons in a solar panel.

In summary, while the literature has largely overlooked the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the name Khalil and solar power generation in Laos, our research sheds a luminescent spotlight on this uncharted territory, illuminating a path that merges statistical analysis with the whimsy of nomenclature and renewable energy. The potential for further exploration in this captivating intersection of fields is as boundless as the solar energy radiating from a cloudless sky, inviting researchers to embark on an exhilarating journey woven with threads of levity and discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Khalil and Solar power generated in Laos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Solar Connections: The Khalil Name Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Laos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing and somewhat baffling relationship between the popularity of the given name Khalil and the generation of solar power in the landlocked country of Laos. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we meticulously pored over names and kilowatts to uncover any hidden connections. Our team was shocked to discover a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9899821 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. While our findings may sound a tad bit sunny and unusual, they indubitably shed light on the whimsical world of nomenclature and renewable energy. This research paves the way for further investigation into the mystical forces that link given names with renewable energy sources, and could potentially spark humorous dinner party conversations for years to come.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The connection between human nomenclature and renewable energy has long been a source of mirth and bafflement. In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the curious case of the name Khalil and its unexpected correlation with solar power generation in the picturesque landscapes of Laos. Despite the initial skepticism that surrounded this investigation, our findings have sparked a surge of excitement in the scientific community—much like the sunrise igniting a solar panel on a crisp morning.
The notion that a seemingly arbitrary first name could have any bearing on the production of solar energy may appear as far-fetched as claiming that a physicist moonlights as a stand-up comedian. However, as we delved into the wealth of data available from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our team was struck by the uncanny level of correlation between the popularity of the name Khalil and the kilowatts generated by Laos' solar panels. It's as if statistical anomalies were lining up like photons in a solar cell—an unexpected and delightful occurrence indeed.
Drawing on our extensive expertise in statistical analysis, we meticulously scrutinized the data, leveraging a multitude of sophisticated methods to tease out any underlying relationships. To our astonishment, the correlation coefficient of 0.9899821 emerged unmistakably from the data, akin to a solar flare commanding attention in the vast expanse of space. This finding was accompanied by a p-value that glimmered as brightly as a well-positioned solar array, firmly establishing the significance of this correlation in a statistical sense.
Our study has the potential to illuminate not only the whimsical and endearing interplay between personal names and renewable energy, but also the importance of keeping an open mind when investigating seemingly improbable phenomena—a reminder as powerful as a bolt of lightning on a summer's day. This unconventional arena of linkages between human names and environmental factors invites us to peer through the lens of statistical analysis with a whimsical twinkle in our eye, transcending the mundane and venturing into uncharted territories of research and discovery.
Thus, this research endeavors to shed light on the unexpected connections that pepper the scientific landscape and to inspire an air of wonder and amusement in the pursuit of knowledge. With that in mind, we embark on this peculiar journey with zeal and a dash of lightheartedness, hoping to infuse the world of academia with a dose of levity that is as refreshing as an unexpected rain shower after an arid spell.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the moniker "Khalil" and the solar power generation in Laos, our research team employed a mix of rigorous statistical analysis and a pinch of whimsical curiosity. Our approach danced along the borders of traditional research methods, much like a photon navigating the intricate pathways of a solar cell. The data utilized for this investigation was primarily sourced from the US Social Security Administration's records of first names and the Energy Information Administration's reports on solar power output in Laos for the years 2012 to 2021.

In our quest to shed light on this peculiar correlation, we embarked on a journey through the labyrinth of statistical methods. At the outset, we engaged in an earnest exploration of descriptive statistics to paint a portrait of the distributions and trends in both the popularity of the name "Khalil" and the solar power generated in Laos. This initial foray into the data landscape was akin to observing the intricate patterns of sunlight filtering through the foliage on a crisp autumn day—revealing both expected and unexpected nuances.

Following this, we harnessed the power of correlation analysis to quantify the degree of association between the fluctuating popularity of the name "Khalil" and the varying levels of solar power generation in Laos. This analytical endeavor unfolded much like the act of deciphering a complex punchline at a comedy show, with each data point playing its part in the grand scheme of experimentation.

Delving deeper, we summoned the statistical might of regression analysis to disentangle any potential causative linkages between the popularity of the name "Khalil" and the solar power generation in Laos. This pursuit was reminiscent of a detective solving a lighthearted mystery, searching for clues and reveling in the unexpected twists that emerged from the depths of the data.

As a final and pivotal step, we conducted a thorough hypothesis test to discern the statistical significance of the relationship between the popularity of the name "Khalil" and the solar power generation in the verdant landscapes of Laos. This process was akin to witnessing the crescendo of a comedic performance, with the p-value serving as the punchline that elicited a chorus of applause from the scientific community.

In summary, our methodology embraced the spirit of scientific inquiry with a touch of levity, to unravel the captivating correlation between a given name and the generation of renewable energy. Through this blend of analytical rigor and whimsical wonder, we endeavored to illuminate the scientific landscape and infuse the pursuit of knowledge with a dash of humor and curiosity—a juxtaposition as delightful as sunshine on a rainy day.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Khalil and Solar power generated in Laos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9899821, r-squared of 0.9800645, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Solar Connections: The Khalil Name Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Laos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing and somewhat baffling relationship between the popularity of the given name Khalil and the generation of solar power in the landlocked country of Laos. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we meticulously pored over names and kilowatts to uncover any hidden connections. Our team was shocked to discover a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9899821 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. While our findings may sound a tad bit sunny and unusual, they indubitably shed light on the whimsical world of nomenclature and renewable energy. This research paves the way for further investigation into the mystical forces that link given names with renewable energy sources, and could potentially spark humorous dinner party conversations for years to come.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The connection between human nomenclature and renewable energy has long been a source of mirth and bafflement. In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the curious case of the name Khalil and its unexpected correlation with solar power generation in the picturesque landscapes of Laos. Despite the initial skepticism that surrounded this investigation, our findings have sparked a surge of excitement in the scientific community—much like the sunrise igniting a solar panel on a crisp morning.
The notion that a seemingly arbitrary first name could have any bearing on the production of solar energy may appear as far-fetched as claiming that a physicist moonlights as a stand-up comedian. However, as we delved into the wealth of data available from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our team was struck by the uncanny level of correlation between the popularity of the name Khalil and the kilowatts generated by Laos' solar panels. It's as if statistical anomalies were lining up like photons in a solar cell—an unexpected and delightful occurrence indeed.
Drawing on our extensive expertise in statistical analysis, we meticulously scrutinized the data, leveraging a multitude of sophisticated methods to tease out any underlying relationships. To our astonishment, the correlation coefficient of 0.9899821 emerged unmistakably from the data, akin to a solar flare commanding attention in the vast expanse of space. This finding was accompanied by a p-value that glimmered as brightly as a well-positioned solar array, firmly establishing the significance of this correlation in a statistical sense.
Our study has the potential to illuminate not only the whimsical and endearing interplay between personal names and renewable energy, but also the importance of keeping an open mind when investigating seemingly improbable phenomena—a reminder as powerful as a bolt of lightning on a summer's day. This unconventional arena of linkages between human names and environmental factors invites us to peer through the lens of statistical analysis with a whimsical twinkle in our eye, transcending the mundane and venturing into uncharted territories of research and discovery.
Thus, this research endeavors to shed light on the unexpected connections that pepper the scientific landscape and to inspire an air of wonder and amusement in the pursuit of knowledge. With that in mind, we embark on this peculiar journey with zeal and a dash of lightheartedness, hoping to infuse the world of academia with a dose of levity that is as refreshing as an unexpected rain shower after an arid spell.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of our data revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Khalil and the solar power generated in Laos. Over the period of 2012 to 2021, the correlation coefficient was calculated to be a staggering 0.9899821, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship. This result was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9800645, further confirming the robustness of the association. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of this correlation shines as brightly as a newly installed solar panel in the midday sun.

In Figure 1, the visualization of the data in a scatterplot unequivocally displays the conspicuous relationship between the popularity of the name Khalil and the solar power generation in Laos. The data points align so closely that one may be prompted to ask if they are orbiting each other like celestial bodies in a binary star system. The remarkable alignment of the data points in the scatterplot mirrors the unexpected harmony of seemingly unrelated variables, much like discovering a serendipitous rhyme in a scientific manuscript.

This finding not only adds a dash of whimsy to the realm of statistical analysis, but it also underscores the potential for unconventional interactions in the world of renewable energy and personal nomenclature. The seemingly disparate domains of human naming conventions and energy generation have collided in an unexpected fusion, much like the collision of particles in a particle accelerator, revealing a nexus of astonishment and amusement. While our results may appear peculiar and even amusing at first glance, they undeniably invite further inquiry and a chuckle or two about the playful quirks of statistical analysis.

Our study stands as a testament to the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena, enticing researchers to embrace a spirit of curiosity and levity in their explorations. The unlikely convergence of the popularity of the first name Khalil and solar power generation in Laos has set the stage for a lighthearted exploration of correlations that may, at first glance, appear as improbable as discovering a pot of gold at the end of a statistical rainbow.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Khalil and Solar power generated in Laos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Solar Connections: The Khalil Name Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Laos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing and somewhat baffling relationship between the popularity of the given name Khalil and the generation of solar power in the landlocked country of Laos. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we meticulously pored over names and kilowatts to uncover any hidden connections. Our team was shocked to discover a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9899821 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. While our findings may sound a tad bit sunny and unusual, they indubitably shed light on the whimsical world of nomenclature and renewable energy. This research paves the way for further investigation into the mystical forces that link given names with renewable energy sources, and could potentially spark humorous dinner party conversations for years to come.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the correlation between personal names and environmental factors is a relatively underexplored area, with most studies focusing on socio-economic and cultural associations. Despite the limited research in this field, our investigation has led us down a path both enlightening and amusing, akin to discovering a hidden treasure map leading to a pot of solar-powered gold.
Doe and Jones delve into the realm of renewable energy in "Journal of Solar Power," discussing the technical advancements and grid integration of solar power in various countries. However, they surprisingly overlook any mention of the potential influence of personal names on solar power generation—a missed opportunity, one might say, not unlike forgetting to bring sunscreen on a scorching day.
Moving beyond the academic realm, "Solar Energy for Dummies" by Renewable Energy Association provides a comprehensive overview of solar power applications, yet regrettably omits any mention of the whimsical influence of personal names on solar energy generation. It seems even a book for "dummies" might not be as thorough as one would hope, much like a solar eclipse unexpectedly occurring on a cloudy day.
In a different avenue, the works of fiction such as "Sunshine and Shadows" by Solaria Bright and "Power in the Palm of Your Hand" by Ray N. G. provide fictional narratives of solar power and its potential impact on characters named Khalil. While these literary offerings may not belong in the annals of scientific journals, they certainly spark the imagination and offer a delightful glimpse into the possibilities of combining personal names with renewable energy, much like a solar-powered carnival ride set against a backdrop of whimsy and wonder.
Turning to popular internet culture, memes such as "Solar Power Khalil" and "Name-Generated Energy" have emerged, humorously speculating on the potential of harnessing solar energy based on the popularity of the name Khalil. While these memes may be lighthearted in nature, they underscore the widespread intrigue and amusement surrounding the unexpected connection we have uncovered, creating a playful dialogue that rivals the sparkling banter of photons in a solar panel.
In summary, while the literature has largely overlooked the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the name Khalil and solar power generation in Laos, our research sheds a luminescent spotlight on this uncharted territory, illuminating a path that merges statistical analysis with the whimsy of nomenclature and renewable energy. The potential for further exploration in this captivating intersection of fields is as boundless as the solar energy radiating from a cloudless sky, inviting researchers to embark on an exhilarating journey woven with threads of levity and discovery.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of our data revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Khalil and the solar power generated in Laos. Over the period of 2012 to 2021, the correlation coefficient was calculated to be a staggering 0.9899821, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship. This result was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9800645, further confirming the robustness of the association. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of this correlation shines as brightly as a newly installed solar panel in the midday sun.
In Figure 1, the visualization of the data in a scatterplot unequivocally displays the conspicuous relationship between the popularity of the name Khalil and the solar power generation in Laos. The data points align so closely that one may be prompted to ask if they are orbiting each other like celestial bodies in a binary star system. The remarkable alignment of the data points in the scatterplot mirrors the unexpected harmony of seemingly unrelated variables, much like discovering a serendipitous rhyme in a scientific manuscript.
This finding not only adds a dash of whimsy to the realm of statistical analysis, but it also underscores the potential for unconventional interactions in the world of renewable energy and personal nomenclature. The seemingly disparate domains of human naming conventions and energy generation have collided in an unexpected fusion, much like the collision of particles in a particle accelerator, revealing a nexus of astonishment and amusement. While our results may appear peculiar and even amusing at first glance, they undeniably invite further inquiry and a chuckle or two about the playful quirks of statistical analysis.
Our study stands as a testament to the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena, enticing researchers to embrace a spirit of curiosity and levity in their explorations. The unlikely convergence of the popularity of the first name Khalil and solar power generation in Laos has set the stage for a lighthearted exploration of correlations that may, at first glance, appear as improbable as discovering a pot of gold at the end of a statistical rainbow.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The remarkably high correlation coefficient and statistical significance discovered in our study between the popularity of the name Khalil and solar power generation in Laos serve as a luminous beacon, guiding us through uncharted scientific territory. Our findings parallel and support previous research on the intriguing intersection of personal nomenclature and environmental factors, which, much like a solar eclipse, remain shrouded in enigmatic allure.

Delving into the whimsical union of personal names and renewable energy, our study not only adds a quirky twist to the world of statistical analysis but also propels us towards a new frontier of investigation. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9899821, akin to a rare gem dazzling under the sun's rays, serves as a resounding affirmation of the profound connection between the name Khalil and solar power generation, potentially opening doors to a plethora of research opportunities.

Our results are a testament to the unexpected correlations that may lurk beneath the surface, much like a light-hearted jest hidden within a seemingly serious discussion. They speak to a wider underlying truth about the richness of the world we inhabit—a world where statistical analysis can unveil amusing connections as unexpectedly as finding a joke halfway through a scientific paper.

Like a whimsical dance of statistical significance, our findings invite researchers to embrace a spirit of lighthearted curiosity in their explorations. This improbable collaboration between the popularity of the name Khalil and the generation of solar power in Laos artfully blends the gravity of statistical analysis with the levity of amusing discoveries, sparking a playful symphony of wonder and inquiry.

Our study, while seemingly whimsical, embraces the notion that even the most surprising connections can shed light on the hidden nuances of our universe. As we continue to unravel the tapestry of relationships between personal names and environmental influences, let us remember that amid the seriousness of academic pursuit, there is always room for a good chuckle or two, much like discovering an unexpected punchline in a stack of research papers.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Khalil and Solar power generated in Laos. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Solar Connections: The Khalil Name Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Laos"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing and somewhat baffling relationship between the popularity of the given name Khalil and the generation of solar power in the landlocked country of Laos. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we meticulously pored over names and kilowatts to uncover any hidden connections. Our team was shocked to discover a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9899821 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. While our findings may sound a tad bit sunny and unusual, they indubitably shed light on the whimsical world of nomenclature and renewable energy. This research paves the way for further investigation into the mystical forces that link given names with renewable energy sources, and could potentially spark humorous dinner party conversations for years to come.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The connection between human nomenclature and renewable energy has long been a source of mirth and bafflement. In this groundbreaking study, we delve into the curious case of the name Khalil and its unexpected correlation with solar power generation in the picturesque landscapes of Laos. Despite the initial skepticism that surrounded this investigation, our findings have sparked a surge of excitement in the scientific community—much like the sunrise igniting a solar panel on a crisp morning.
The notion that a seemingly arbitrary first name could have any bearing on the production of solar energy may appear as far-fetched as claiming that a physicist moonlights as a stand-up comedian. However, as we delved into the wealth of data available from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our team was struck by the uncanny level of correlation between the popularity of the name Khalil and the kilowatts generated by Laos' solar panels. It's as if statistical anomalies were lining up like photons in a solar cell—an unexpected and delightful occurrence indeed.
Drawing on our extensive expertise in statistical analysis, we meticulously scrutinized the data, leveraging a multitude of sophisticated methods to tease out any underlying relationships. To our astonishment, the correlation coefficient of 0.9899821 emerged unmistakably from the data, akin to a solar flare commanding attention in the vast expanse of space. This finding was accompanied by a p-value that glimmered as brightly as a well-positioned solar array, firmly establishing the significance of this correlation in a statistical sense.
Our study has the potential to illuminate not only the whimsical and endearing interplay between personal names and renewable energy, but also the importance of keeping an open mind when investigating seemingly improbable phenomena—a reminder as powerful as a bolt of lightning on a summer's day. This unconventional arena of linkages between human names and environmental factors invites us to peer through the lens of statistical analysis with a whimsical twinkle in our eye, transcending the mundane and venturing into uncharted territories of research and discovery.
Thus, this research endeavors to shed light on the unexpected connections that pepper the scientific landscape and to inspire an air of wonder and amusement in the pursuit of knowledge. With that in mind, we embark on this peculiar journey with zeal and a dash of lightheartedness, hoping to infuse the world of academia with a dose of levity that is as refreshing as an unexpected rain shower after an arid spell.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of our data revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Khalil and the solar power generated in Laos. Over the period of 2012 to 2021, the correlation coefficient was calculated to be a staggering 0.9899821, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship. This result was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.9800645, further confirming the robustness of the association. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of this correlation shines as brightly as a newly installed solar panel in the midday sun.
In Figure 1, the visualization of the data in a scatterplot unequivocally displays the conspicuous relationship between the popularity of the name Khalil and the solar power generation in Laos. The data points align so closely that one may be prompted to ask if they are orbiting each other like celestial bodies in a binary star system. The remarkable alignment of the data points in the scatterplot mirrors the unexpected harmony of seemingly unrelated variables, much like discovering a serendipitous rhyme in a scientific manuscript.
This finding not only adds a dash of whimsy to the realm of statistical analysis, but it also underscores the potential for unconventional interactions in the world of renewable energy and personal nomenclature. The seemingly disparate domains of human naming conventions and energy generation have collided in an unexpected fusion, much like the collision of particles in a particle accelerator, revealing a nexus of astonishment and amusement. While our results may appear peculiar and even amusing at first glance, they undeniably invite further inquiry and a chuckle or two about the playful quirks of statistical analysis.
Our study stands as a testament to the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of seemingly unrelated phenomena, enticing researchers to embrace a spirit of curiosity and levity in their explorations. The unlikely convergence of the popularity of the first name Khalil and solar power generation in Laos has set the stage for a lighthearted exploration of correlations that may, at first glance, appear as improbable as discovering a pot of gold at the end of a statistical rainbow.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research sheds a comically illuminating light on the surprising connection between the popularity of the first name Khalil and solar power generation in Laos. This unexpected correlation, with a remarkably high coefficient and a statistically significant p-value, serves as a reminder that even in the serious world of statistical analysis, there is room for whimsy and astonishment. Our findings are as unexpected as finding a statistical unicorn prancing through a scatterplot.

This study opens the door to a voyage of scientific inquiry that is as captivating as a solar eclipse and as delightfully puzzling as a physics-themed magic show. The correlation between personal names and renewable energy sources may seem as far-fetched as a quantum physicist performing stand-up comedy, but it beckons us to approach research with a twinkle in our eye and a willingness to embrace the unexpected.

In the grand tapestry of science, our investigation offers a playful thread that intertwines statistical analysis with the delightful mysteries of nomenclature and renewable energy. As we bid adieu to this peculiar journey, we assert with utmost confidence that no further research is needed in this area—unless, of course, one seeks to unravel the whimsical dance of statistical anomalies and the playful whispers of correlation coefficients in realms where laughter and astonishment merge in a scientific waltz.

With that, we sign off, confident that our findings will provoke a stimulating blend of contemplation and merriment, much like a thought-provoking physics joke or an unexpected burst of solar power on an overcast day.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Shocking Solar Connections: The Khalil Name Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Laos. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Solar Semantics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Shocking Solar Connections: The Khalil Name Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Laos. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Global Solar Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Shocking Solar Connections: The Khalil Name Popularity and Solar Power Generation in Laos with an abstract of This study investigates the intriguing and somewhat baffling relationship between the popularity of the given name Khalil and the generation of solar power in the landlocked country of Laos. Drawing on data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we meticulously pored over names and kilowatts to uncover any hidden connections. Our team was shocked to discover a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9899821 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. While our findings may sound a tad bit sunny and unusual, they indubitably shed light on the whimsical world of nomenclature and renewable energy. This research paves the way for further investigation into the mystical forces that link given names with renewable energy sources, and could potentially spark humorous dinner party conversations for years to come.

ChatGPT:

"Khalil name popularity, solar power generation, Laos, correlation coefficient, renewable energy sources, given names, US Social Security Administration, Energy Information Administration, kilowatts, nomenclature, statistical significance, mystic forces"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Khalil
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Khalil
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Khalil

Solar power generated in Laos
Detailed data title: Total solar power generated in Laos in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Solar power generated in Laos

Correlation r = 0.9899821 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9800645 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 98% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Solar power generated in Laos) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Khalil) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.4E-8. 0.0000000435371591009056100000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 4.4E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 22,968,885 random variables You don't actually need 22 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.96, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Khalil (Babies born)622611630630700740802114112391148
Solar power generated in Laos (Billion kWh)0.00040.0010.0040.0040.0050.010.0190.0420.0430.044




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([622,611,630,630,700,740,802,1141,1239,1148,])
array_2 = np.array([0.0004,0.001,0.004,0.004,0.005,0.01,0.019,0.042,0.043,0.044,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Khalil"
array_2_name = "Solar power generated in Laos"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 2481 · Black Variable ID: 2686 · Red Variable ID: 23780
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0