about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,471 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Texas and the second variable is Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Texas cornfields transitioned to non-GMO crops, they began to emit a faint, high-pitched sound that only UFOs could detect. This sound, reminiscent of alien elevator music, acted as a natural repellent, prompting UFOs to seek out more biotechnologically inclined states. However, this correlation is simply a coincidental alignment of two unrelated trends.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create a visual of a meme where a Texas cornfield is shown with rows of healthy, non-GMO corn plants standing tall under the bright sun. The corn stalks are emitting a faint, shimmering distress signal, creating a protective barrier around the field. Above the cornfield, a digital map displays a decrease in Google searches for "report UFO sighting" in the Texas region. Meanwhile, UFOs can be seen veering away, their navigation systems disrupted by the unexpected force field generated by the corn. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a meme Symbolism Vaporwave Cyber folk Woodblock painting
ChatGPT: a meme

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting', in the following situation: The decrease in GMO use led to the corn sending out distress signals, which disrupted the UFO navigation systems, making them less likely to visit Texas. The GMO-free corn essentially created a force field against alien attention.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast Texas cornfield, rows of GMO-free corn stand tall and healthy under the bright sun. The corn stalks send out a faint, shimmering distress signal, creating a protective barrier around the field. Meanwhile, above the field, a digital map shows a decrease in Google searches for "report UFO sighting" in the Texas region as hovering UFOs veer away, their navigation systems disrupted by the corn's unexpected force field.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a meme ] and depicting this scene: In a vast Texas cornfield, rows of GMO-free corn stand tall and healthy under the bright sun. The corn stalks send out a faint, shimmering distress signal, creating a protective barrier around the field. Meanwhile, above the field, a digital map shows a decrease in Google searches for "report UFO sighting" in the Texas region as hovering UFOs veer away, their navigation systems disrupted by the corn's unexpected force field. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create a visual of a meme where a Texas cornfield is shown with rows of healthy, non-GMO corn plants standing tall under the bright sun. The corn stalks are emitting a faint, shimmering distress signal, creating a protective barrier around the field. Above the cornfield, a digital map displays a decrease in Google searches for "report UFO sighting" in the Texas region. Meanwhile, UFOs can be seen veering away, their navigation systems disrupted by the unexpected force field generated by the corn.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in Texas caused report UFO sighting (Google searches for 'report UFO sighting') to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Corn Connection: Exploring the GMO-Google UFO Nexus in Texas

The Journal of Interdisciplinary Agrarian Extraterrestrial Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9285059 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Corn Connection: Exploring the GMO-Google UFO Nexus in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the fascinating and enigmatic relationship between the widespread use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sightings'. Leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, our research team delves into this peculiar correlation, which has long intrigued both skeptics and believers alike. After conducting rigorous statistical analyses, we obtained a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9285059 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2005 to 2023. Our findings yield valuable insights but also raise whimsical questions that transcend traditional scientific boundaries, inviting ponderings on the interplay between agricultural practices, internet search behavior, and extraterrestrial intrigue.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Corn Connection: Exploring the GMO-Google UFO Nexus in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the fascinating and enigmatic relationship between the widespread use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sightings'. Leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, our research team delves into this peculiar correlation, which has long intrigued both skeptics and believers alike. After conducting rigorous statistical analyses, we obtained a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9285059 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2005 to 2023. Our findings yield valuable insights but also raise whimsical questions that transcend traditional scientific boundaries, inviting ponderings on the interplay between agricultural practices, internet search behavior, and extraterrestrial intrigue.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The enigmatic allure of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has captured public fascination for decades, prompting widespread speculation and inquiry into their existence and origin. While the phenomenon of UFO sightings remains shrouded in mystery and controversy, our research aims to shed light on a rather unexpected association involving genetically modified organism (GMO) corn cultivation and the whimsical act of reporting such sightings. The state of Texas, long revered for its sprawling cornfields and captivating night skies, serves as the backdrop for our investigation into the GMO-Google UFO nexus.

Our study delves into the intriguing confluence of agricultural practices and internet search behavior, examining the peculiar correlation between GMO corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for reporting UFO sightings. By leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the expansive repository of Google Trends, we set out to unearth potential links between these seemingly disparate realms. While the veracity of UFO claims remains a subject of vigorous debate, our research forges a path through this uncharted territory, navigating the intersection of statistical analysis and speculative interstellar intrigue.

This paper presents the culmination of our rigorous investigation, culminating in a striking correlation coefficient and statistical significance that elicits thoughtful reflection and mirthful bemusement in equal measure. Our findings not only contribute to the burgeoning literature on the intersection of agriculture and digital culture but also impart a whimsical allure that transcends the conventional bounds of scientific inquiry. Through this distinctive lens, we invite readers to journey with us into a realm where statistical rigor meets imaginative reverie, and where the cornfields of Texas cast a lighthearted shadow on the cosmic query of UFO encounters.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Corn Connection: Exploring the GMO-Google UFO Nexus in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the fascinating and enigmatic relationship between the widespread use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sightings'. Leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, our research team delves into this peculiar correlation, which has long intrigued both skeptics and believers alike. After conducting rigorous statistical analyses, we obtained a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9285059 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2005 to 2023. Our findings yield valuable insights but also raise whimsical questions that transcend traditional scientific boundaries, inviting ponderings on the interplay between agricultural practices, internet search behavior, and extraterrestrial intrigue.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enigmatic allure of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has captured public fascination for decades, prompting widespread speculation and inquiry into their existence and origin. While the phenomenon of UFO sightings remains shrouded in mystery and controversy, our research aims to shed light on a rather unexpected association involving genetically modified organism (GMO) corn cultivation and the whimsical act of reporting such sightings. The state of Texas, long revered for its sprawling cornfields and captivating night skies, serves as the backdrop for our investigation into the GMO-Google UFO nexus.
Our study delves into the intriguing confluence of agricultural practices and internet search behavior, examining the peculiar correlation between GMO corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for reporting UFO sightings. By leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the expansive repository of Google Trends, we set out to unearth potential links between these seemingly disparate realms. While the veracity of UFO claims remains a subject of vigorous debate, our research forges a path through this uncharted territory, navigating the intersection of statistical analysis and speculative interstellar intrigue.
This paper presents the culmination of our rigorous investigation, culminating in a striking correlation coefficient and statistical significance that elicits thoughtful reflection and mirthful bemusement in equal measure. Our findings not only contribute to the burgeoning literature on the intersection of agriculture and digital culture but also impart a whimsical allure that transcends the conventional bounds of scientific inquiry. Through this distinctive lens, we invite readers to journey with us into a realm where statistical rigor meets imaginative reverie, and where the cornfields of Texas cast a lighthearted shadow on the cosmic query of UFO encounters.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature pertaining to the connection between genetically modified organism (GMO) corn cultivation and internet search behavior for UFO sightings presents a fascinating array of perspectives and analysis. Smith et al. (2010) examine the ecological impact of GMO crops in the agricultural landscape, shedding light on the intricate symbiosis between plant genetics and environmental variables. Expanding on this ecological discourse, Doe and Jones (2015) delve into the socioeconomic implications of GMO adoption in Texas, offering compelling insights into the interplay between agricultural innovation and market dynamics.

Moving beyond the traditional confines of scientific inquiry, the authors journey into the realm of popular culture and speculative fiction. "Genetically Modified Organisms: A Layman's Guide" by Wilkins (2016) provides an accessible overview of GMO technology, catering to a broad spectrum of readership. Furthermore, "The Corn Conspiracy Chronicles" by Greene (2018) ventures into the realm of extraterrestrial fascination, interweaving tales of GMO intrigue with speculative narratives of intergalactic encounters.

In extending the scope of inquiry, the authors extended their examination into unconventional sources. In an unorthodox turn of events, the researchers gleaned insights from literature concealed in the depths of everyday mundanity, delving into the esoteric wisdom of CVS receipts, uncovering hidden patterns that ostensibly bore relevance to the GMO-Google UFO nexus. This unorthodox venture, while whimsically unconventional, offered a whimsical departure from traditional scholarly discourse.

While the academic expanse of literature surrounding UFO sightings and agricultural practices has exuded scholarly sobriety, the interplay between such pursuits demands an appreciation of both empirical rigor and humorous reflection. As the authors transition from the stoic portrayal of statistical analyses to the ephemeral allure of speculative whimsy, the synthesis of these seemingly incongruent dimensions unfolds a narrative that transcends the conventional boundaries of scientific inquiry, inviting readers to embark on a journey where statistical precision intertwines with the imaginative fervor of cosmic contemplation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2005 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Corn Connection: Exploring the GMO-Google UFO Nexus in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the fascinating and enigmatic relationship between the widespread use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sightings'. Leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, our research team delves into this peculiar correlation, which has long intrigued both skeptics and believers alike. After conducting rigorous statistical analyses, we obtained a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9285059 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2005 to 2023. Our findings yield valuable insights but also raise whimsical questions that transcend traditional scientific boundaries, inviting ponderings on the interplay between agricultural practices, internet search behavior, and extraterrestrial intrigue.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enigmatic allure of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has captured public fascination for decades, prompting widespread speculation and inquiry into their existence and origin. While the phenomenon of UFO sightings remains shrouded in mystery and controversy, our research aims to shed light on a rather unexpected association involving genetically modified organism (GMO) corn cultivation and the whimsical act of reporting such sightings. The state of Texas, long revered for its sprawling cornfields and captivating night skies, serves as the backdrop for our investigation into the GMO-Google UFO nexus.
Our study delves into the intriguing confluence of agricultural practices and internet search behavior, examining the peculiar correlation between GMO corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for reporting UFO sightings. By leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the expansive repository of Google Trends, we set out to unearth potential links between these seemingly disparate realms. While the veracity of UFO claims remains a subject of vigorous debate, our research forges a path through this uncharted territory, navigating the intersection of statistical analysis and speculative interstellar intrigue.
This paper presents the culmination of our rigorous investigation, culminating in a striking correlation coefficient and statistical significance that elicits thoughtful reflection and mirthful bemusement in equal measure. Our findings not only contribute to the burgeoning literature on the intersection of agriculture and digital culture but also impart a whimsical allure that transcends the conventional bounds of scientific inquiry. Through this distinctive lens, we invite readers to journey with us into a realm where statistical rigor meets imaginative reverie, and where the cornfields of Texas cast a lighthearted shadow on the cosmic query of UFO encounters.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Sample Selection and Data Collection:
To investigate the perplexing correlation between GMO corn cultivation in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sightings', our research team adopted a multidimensional approach to data collection. We meticulously compiled agricultural data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), cataloging the prevalence of GMO corn cultivation across various counties in Texas from 2005 to 2023. Additionally, we harnessed the expansive capabilities of Google Trends, capturing the frequency of online searches related to reporting UFO sightings within the same temporal scope. The inception of this methodological fusion marked the commencement of our empirical odyssey into the juxtaposition of earthly agriculture and otherworldly fascination.

Statistical Analysis:
With our richly layered dataset in tow, we embarked on a quest for quantitative comprehension, employing robust statistical tools to unravel the intricacies of our core inquiry. Utilizing a combination of regression analysis and time series modeling, we endeavored to discern patterns and anomalies that might underpin the GMO-Google UFO nexus. Delving into the statistical underbrush, we sifted through coefficients, leveraged p-values, and navigated the tangled web of statistical significance, culminating in the emergence of a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.9285059 with a p-value of less than 0.01. Despite the cerebral rigor of our analytical escapade, the whimsical nature of our subject matter injected a dash of levity into our statistical sojourn, prompting the occasional wry smile amidst the melodious chime of finding statistical significance.

Control Variables and Sensitivity Analyses:
To fortify the robustness of our findings, we diligently accounted for potential confounders and extraneous factors that could potentially influence our results. Controlling for variables such as temperature, precipitation, lunar phases, and the release of Hollywood blockbuster films featuring extraterrestrial motifs, we sought to distill the essence of our central correlation. Furthermore, we conducted sensitivity analyses to assess the resilience of our results to variations in model specifications, ensuring that our inferences withstood the tempestuous winds of alternative methodological configurations.

Time-Series Decomposition:
In recognition of the temporal dimension inherent in our dataset, we engaged in an intricate dance with time-series decomposition techniques, unraveling the underlying trends, seasonal fluctuations, and potential aberrations that might mask or magnify our observed association. The ebb and flow of corn cultivation and UFO search queries gave rise to evocative waveforms that mirrored the undulating expanse of our intellectual inquiry, leaving in their wake a trail of statistical breadcrumbs that gleamed with the promise of discovery.

Ethical Considerations:
Throughout our research endeavor, we remained steadfast in our commitment to ethical conduct and scholarly integrity. Our exploration of the intersection between agriculture and extraterrestrial intrigue adhered to the highest standards of scientific inquiry, entwining curiosity with conscientiousness to nurture a fertile ground for intellectual exploration. Moreover, we navigated the labyrinthine corridors of internet search trends with the utmost respect for user privacy and confidentiality, safeguarding the sanctity of individual inquiry within the digital expanses of data.

In culmination, our methodological odyssey culminated in a harmonious symphony of data, analysis, and nuanced inquiry, epitomizing the duality of scholarly rigor and lighthearted curiosity that served as our guiding stars amidst the celestial expanse of agricultural tendrils and cosmic quests.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2005 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9285059, r-squared of 0.8621232, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Corn Connection: Exploring the GMO-Google UFO Nexus in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the fascinating and enigmatic relationship between the widespread use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sightings'. Leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, our research team delves into this peculiar correlation, which has long intrigued both skeptics and believers alike. After conducting rigorous statistical analyses, we obtained a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9285059 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2005 to 2023. Our findings yield valuable insights but also raise whimsical questions that transcend traditional scientific boundaries, inviting ponderings on the interplay between agricultural practices, internet search behavior, and extraterrestrial intrigue.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The enigmatic allure of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has captured public fascination for decades, prompting widespread speculation and inquiry into their existence and origin. While the phenomenon of UFO sightings remains shrouded in mystery and controversy, our research aims to shed light on a rather unexpected association involving genetically modified organism (GMO) corn cultivation and the whimsical act of reporting such sightings. The state of Texas, long revered for its sprawling cornfields and captivating night skies, serves as the backdrop for our investigation into the GMO-Google UFO nexus.
Our study delves into the intriguing confluence of agricultural practices and internet search behavior, examining the peculiar correlation between GMO corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for reporting UFO sightings. By leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the expansive repository of Google Trends, we set out to unearth potential links between these seemingly disparate realms. While the veracity of UFO claims remains a subject of vigorous debate, our research forges a path through this uncharted territory, navigating the intersection of statistical analysis and speculative interstellar intrigue.
This paper presents the culmination of our rigorous investigation, culminating in a striking correlation coefficient and statistical significance that elicits thoughtful reflection and mirthful bemusement in equal measure. Our findings not only contribute to the burgeoning literature on the intersection of agriculture and digital culture but also impart a whimsical allure that transcends the conventional bounds of scientific inquiry. Through this distinctive lens, we invite readers to journey with us into a realm where statistical rigor meets imaginative reverie, and where the cornfields of Texas cast a lighthearted shadow on the cosmic query of UFO encounters.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) corn cultivation in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sightings' yielded intriguing findings. Across the years 2005 to 2023, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9285059 was observed, indicating a strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. This correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8621232, denoting that a noteworthy proportion of the variability in UFO sighting reports can be explained by the prevalence of GMO corn cultivation. Furthermore, the statistical significance of this association, with a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforces the robustness of our findings.

The scatterplot shown in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the substantial correlation observed between GMO corn use in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. The plot illustrates a clear trend, elucidating the pronounced relationship between these variables. While the scientific community may traditionally focus on more conventional agricultural outcomes, the propensity for such a correlation to emerge sparks imaginative contemplation and quizzical curiosity.

Our findings, although rooted in rigorous statistical analysis, transcend mere quantification. They invite a whimsical musing on the intersection of agricultural practices and collective fascination with the unknown, tantalizing the mind with the prospect of extraterrestrial visitations manifested through the digital sphere. The juxtaposition of GMO corn production and the search for UFO sightings portrays an unexpected convergence, prompting contemplation on the interconnected tapestry of human curiosity, agricultural innovation, and celestial contemplation.

In conclusion, this investigation into the relationship between GMO corn cultivation in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sightings' not only elucidates a substantial correlation but also beckons a lighthearted reverie amidst the scientific scrutiny. These findings provide a glimpse into an unconventional but captivating correlation, inviting both scientific inquiry and lighthearted contemplation—a confluence where the statistical and the speculative converge in delightful harmony.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Corn Connection: Exploring the GMO-Google UFO Nexus in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the fascinating and enigmatic relationship between the widespread use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sightings'. Leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, our research team delves into this peculiar correlation, which has long intrigued both skeptics and believers alike. After conducting rigorous statistical analyses, we obtained a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9285059 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2005 to 2023. Our findings yield valuable insights but also raise whimsical questions that transcend traditional scientific boundaries, inviting ponderings on the interplay between agricultural practices, internet search behavior, and extraterrestrial intrigue.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature pertaining to the connection between genetically modified organism (GMO) corn cultivation and internet search behavior for UFO sightings presents a fascinating array of perspectives and analysis. Smith et al. (2010) examine the ecological impact of GMO crops in the agricultural landscape, shedding light on the intricate symbiosis between plant genetics and environmental variables. Expanding on this ecological discourse, Doe and Jones (2015) delve into the socioeconomic implications of GMO adoption in Texas, offering compelling insights into the interplay between agricultural innovation and market dynamics.
Moving beyond the traditional confines of scientific inquiry, the authors journey into the realm of popular culture and speculative fiction. "Genetically Modified Organisms: A Layman's Guide" by Wilkins (2016) provides an accessible overview of GMO technology, catering to a broad spectrum of readership. Furthermore, "The Corn Conspiracy Chronicles" by Greene (2018) ventures into the realm of extraterrestrial fascination, interweaving tales of GMO intrigue with speculative narratives of intergalactic encounters.
In extending the scope of inquiry, the authors extended their examination into unconventional sources. In an unorthodox turn of events, the researchers gleaned insights from literature concealed in the depths of everyday mundanity, delving into the esoteric wisdom of CVS receipts, uncovering hidden patterns that ostensibly bore relevance to the GMO-Google UFO nexus. This unorthodox venture, while whimsically unconventional, offered a whimsical departure from traditional scholarly discourse.
While the academic expanse of literature surrounding UFO sightings and agricultural practices has exuded scholarly sobriety, the interplay between such pursuits demands an appreciation of both empirical rigor and humorous reflection. As the authors transition from the stoic portrayal of statistical analyses to the ephemeral allure of speculative whimsy, the synthesis of these seemingly incongruent dimensions unfolds a narrative that transcends the conventional boundaries of scientific inquiry, inviting readers to embark on a journey where statistical precision intertwines with the imaginative fervor of cosmic contemplation.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) corn cultivation in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sightings' yielded intriguing findings. Across the years 2005 to 2023, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9285059 was observed, indicating a strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. This correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8621232, denoting that a noteworthy proportion of the variability in UFO sighting reports can be explained by the prevalence of GMO corn cultivation. Furthermore, the statistical significance of this association, with a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforces the robustness of our findings.
The scatterplot shown in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the substantial correlation observed between GMO corn use in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. The plot illustrates a clear trend, elucidating the pronounced relationship between these variables. While the scientific community may traditionally focus on more conventional agricultural outcomes, the propensity for such a correlation to emerge sparks imaginative contemplation and quizzical curiosity.
Our findings, although rooted in rigorous statistical analysis, transcend mere quantification. They invite a whimsical musing on the intersection of agricultural practices and collective fascination with the unknown, tantalizing the mind with the prospect of extraterrestrial visitations manifested through the digital sphere. The juxtaposition of GMO corn production and the search for UFO sightings portrays an unexpected convergence, prompting contemplation on the interconnected tapestry of human curiosity, agricultural innovation, and celestial contemplation.
In conclusion, this investigation into the relationship between GMO corn cultivation in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sightings' not only elucidates a substantial correlation but also beckons a lighthearted reverie amidst the scientific scrutiny. These findings provide a glimpse into an unconventional but captivating correlation, inviting both scientific inquiry and lighthearted contemplation—a confluence where the statistical and the speculative converge in delightful harmony.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The enthralling correlation uncovered in our study between the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sightings' illuminates a captivating nexus that extends beyond the realms of traditional scholarly inquiry. Our findings underscore the remarkable interconnectedness between seemingly incongruous domains, prompting contemplation on the enigmatic interplay between agricultural practices and societal preoccupation with extraterrestrial phenomena.

The robust correlation coefficient obtained, indicating a strong positive association between GMO corn cultivation and the frequency of UFO sighting reports, resonates with prior research that has probed unconventional linkages. Our findings harmonize with the ecological and socioeconomic discussions surrounding GMO adoption in the agricultural landscape, reinforcing the intricate web of relationships that animate agricultural innovation and societal dynamics. Furthermore, a notable congruence emerges with the whimsical narratives of "The Corn Conspiracy Chronicles" by Greene (2018), as our study traverses the interface of agricultural intrigue and speculative fascination, serving as a testament to the captivating interplay between scientific scrutiny and imaginative contemplation.

Our endeavor echoes the unconventional tenor of Wilkins' (2016) accessible guide to GMO technology, invoking the allure of speculative inquiry while maintaining the rigor of statistical scrutiny. The unorthodox integration of literary insights derived from commonplace sources, such as the inscrutable wisdom of CVS receipts, lends an idiosyncratic charm to our scholarly pursuit, engendering a playful departure from conventional scholarly discourse. Our findings, while anchored in empirical precision, transcend mere quantification, inviting a playful reverie on the entwinement of agricultural innovation, human curiosity, and the cosmic unknown.

The association observed in our study not only points to a tangible correlation but also evokes a lighthearted musing amidst scientific rigor, echoing the sentiments expressed in "The Corn Conspiracy Chronicles" by Greene (2018). This ethereal alignment of GMO corn production and the quest for UFO sightings not only elicits scientific contemplation but also beckons the mind to partake in a quirky escapade where statistical exactitude intertwines with imaginative whimsy.

In summary, our study not only augments the burgeoning literature on GMO agriculture and societal intrigue but also inspires a lighthearted embrace of the confluence between the scholarly and the speculative. This alliance beckons a fusion of statistical acumen and fanciful contemplation, where the enigmatic tapestry of human curiosity and agricultural innovation intertwines with cosmic contemplation in delightful harmony.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Corn Connection: Exploring the GMO-Google UFO Nexus in Texas

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the fascinating and enigmatic relationship between the widespread use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sightings'. Leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, our research team delves into this peculiar correlation, which has long intrigued both skeptics and believers alike. After conducting rigorous statistical analyses, we obtained a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9285059 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2005 to 2023. Our findings yield valuable insights but also raise whimsical questions that transcend traditional scientific boundaries, inviting ponderings on the interplay between agricultural practices, internet search behavior, and extraterrestrial intrigue.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The enigmatic allure of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has captured public fascination for decades, prompting widespread speculation and inquiry into their existence and origin. While the phenomenon of UFO sightings remains shrouded in mystery and controversy, our research aims to shed light on a rather unexpected association involving genetically modified organism (GMO) corn cultivation and the whimsical act of reporting such sightings. The state of Texas, long revered for its sprawling cornfields and captivating night skies, serves as the backdrop for our investigation into the GMO-Google UFO nexus.
Our study delves into the intriguing confluence of agricultural practices and internet search behavior, examining the peculiar correlation between GMO corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for reporting UFO sightings. By leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the expansive repository of Google Trends, we set out to unearth potential links between these seemingly disparate realms. While the veracity of UFO claims remains a subject of vigorous debate, our research forges a path through this uncharted territory, navigating the intersection of statistical analysis and speculative interstellar intrigue.
This paper presents the culmination of our rigorous investigation, culminating in a striking correlation coefficient and statistical significance that elicits thoughtful reflection and mirthful bemusement in equal measure. Our findings not only contribute to the burgeoning literature on the intersection of agriculture and digital culture but also impart a whimsical allure that transcends the conventional bounds of scientific inquiry. Through this distinctive lens, we invite readers to journey with us into a realm where statistical rigor meets imaginative reverie, and where the cornfields of Texas cast a lighthearted shadow on the cosmic query of UFO encounters.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) corn cultivation in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sightings' yielded intriguing findings. Across the years 2005 to 2023, a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9285059 was observed, indicating a strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. This correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8621232, denoting that a noteworthy proportion of the variability in UFO sighting reports can be explained by the prevalence of GMO corn cultivation. Furthermore, the statistical significance of this association, with a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforces the robustness of our findings.
The scatterplot shown in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the substantial correlation observed between GMO corn use in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. The plot illustrates a clear trend, elucidating the pronounced relationship between these variables. While the scientific community may traditionally focus on more conventional agricultural outcomes, the propensity for such a correlation to emerge sparks imaginative contemplation and quizzical curiosity.
Our findings, although rooted in rigorous statistical analysis, transcend mere quantification. They invite a whimsical musing on the intersection of agricultural practices and collective fascination with the unknown, tantalizing the mind with the prospect of extraterrestrial visitations manifested through the digital sphere. The juxtaposition of GMO corn production and the search for UFO sightings portrays an unexpected convergence, prompting contemplation on the interconnected tapestry of human curiosity, agricultural innovation, and celestial contemplation.
In conclusion, this investigation into the relationship between GMO corn cultivation in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sightings' not only elucidates a substantial correlation but also beckons a lighthearted reverie amidst the scientific scrutiny. These findings provide a glimpse into an unconventional but captivating correlation, inviting both scientific inquiry and lighthearted contemplation—a confluence where the statistical and the speculative converge in delightful harmony.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
In concluding our study, we cannot help but marvel at the curious correlation between GMO corn cultivation in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sightings'. The significant correlation coefficient and statistical significance emphasize the robustness of this association, prompting both scholarly inquiry and imaginative ponderings into the whimsical interplay of agricultural practices and extraterrestrial intrigue. While we remain steadfast in our commitment to scholarly rigor, we cannot ignore the delightful whimsy that accompanies the contemplation of this unexpected nexus. As we contemplate the enigmatic dance between statistical causation and celestial fascination, we are reminded that scientific inquiry does not always follow a linear path but can lead us down unexpected avenues that tickle the intellect and stir the imagination. The correlation between GMO corn production and UFO search queries provokes a chuckle and a quizzical eyebrow raise, reminding us that science, just like UFO sightings, can be both captivating and bemusing.
In light of these findings, we assert that further research in this area is not required—after all, we must not overdo it and risk being abducted by extremes!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Corn Connection: Exploring the GMO-Google UFO Nexus in Texas. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Interdisciplinary Agrarian Extraterrestrial Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Corn Connection: Exploring the GMO-Google UFO Nexus in Texas. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Unconventional Agricultural Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Corn Connection: Exploring the GMO-Google UFO Nexus in Texas with an abstract of In this study, we investigate the fascinating and enigmatic relationship between the widespread use of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sightings'. Leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, our research team delves into this peculiar correlation, which has long intrigued both skeptics and believers alike. After conducting rigorous statistical analyses, we obtained a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9285059 and p < 0.01, spanning the years 2005 to 2023. Our findings yield valuable insights but also raise whimsical questions that transcend traditional scientific boundaries, inviting ponderings on the interplay between agricultural practices, internet search behavior, and extraterrestrial intrigue.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn, Texas, Google search, UFO sightings, correlation, USDA data, Google Trends, statistical analysis, agricultural practices, extraterrestrial intrigue

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Texas
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Texas that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Texas

Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'

Correlation r = 0.9285059 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8621232 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'report UFO sighting') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Texas) over the 19 years from 2005 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.9E-9. 0.0000000098771786404069540000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 9.9E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 101,243,486 random variables You don't actually need 101 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.82, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in Texas (GMO corn %)423737313027242120171211131298989
Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' (Rel. search volume)12.416713.259.833339.1666710.416711.83338.166676.55.416673.916675.333333.52.833333.583334.4166744.53.166673.4




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([42,37,37,31,30,27,24,21,20,17,12,11,13,12,9,8,9,8,9,])
array_2 = np.array([12.4167,13.25,9.83333,9.16667,10.4167,11.8333,8.16667,6.5,5.41667,3.91667,5.33333,3.5,2.83333,3.58333,4.41667,4,4.5,3.16667,3.4,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Texas"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 2471 · Black Variable ID: 736 · Red Variable ID: 1392
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0