about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,447 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and the second variable is Google searches for 'please clap'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana rose, there was a corresponding surge in profound lectures and discussions. One particularly captivating lesson on the nature of applause created a ripple effect. Pondering the metaphysical significance of clapping, students and locals alike turned to Google, seeking enlightenment on the polite yet strangely complex societal norm. Remember, even the most brilliant of ideas may fall flat without a little support!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Whimsical illustration ] Generate an image of a cozy classroom at a university in Louisiana. In the classroom, a group of students sits engaged in a lively discussion while the professor, along with several colleagues, passionately delves into deep existential questions related to philosophy and religion. They are preparing for an upcoming conference. Meanwhile, outside the window, someone is joyfully searching on their laptop for "please clap" on Google, seeking a virtual pat on the back after a heated debate. Capture the whimsical essence of the scene with an artistic touch to the classroom setting and the interaction between the characters. Highlight the cheerful curiosity of the person outside the window as they search for a simple affirmation in the midst of intellectual exploration. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'please clap'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Scalar art Charcoal Minimalism Whimsical illustration Woodblock painting
ChatGPT: Whimsical illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'please clap', in the following situation: The increase in university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana led to more intense debates and contemplation, instilling a profound need for validation, prompting people to turn to the internet in search of an affirming round of applause. Because who doesn't need some divine intervention in the form of applause every now and then?. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy classroom at a university in Louisiana, a group of students sit engaged in a lively discussion, led by a philosophy and religion teacher who is passionately delving into deep existential questions. The professor, along with several colleagues, all dedicated to the study of philosophy and religion, are preparing for an upcoming conference. Meanwhile, outside the window, someone is joyfully searching on their laptop for "please clap" on Google, seeking a virtual pat on the back after a heated debate.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Whimsical illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy classroom at a university in Louisiana, a group of students sit engaged in a lively discussion, led by a philosophy and religion teacher who is passionately delving into deep existential questions. The professor, along with several colleagues, all dedicated to the study of philosophy and religion, are preparing for an upcoming conference. Meanwhile, outside the window, someone is joyfully searching on their laptop for "please clap" on Google, seeking a virtual pat on the back after a heated debate. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Whimsical illustration ] Generate an image of a cozy classroom at a university in Louisiana. In the classroom, a group of students sits engaged in a lively discussion while the professor, along with several colleagues, passionately delves into deep existential questions related to philosophy and religion. They are preparing for an upcoming conference. Meanwhile, outside the window, someone is joyfully searching on their laptop for "please clap" on Google, seeking a virtual pat on the back after a heated debate. Capture the whimsical essence of the scene with an artistic touch to the classroom setting and the interaction between the characters. Highlight the cheerful curiosity of the person outside the window as they search for a simple affirmation in the midst of intellectual exploration.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana caused please clap (Google searches for 'please clap') to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Enigma of Please Clap: A Philosophical and Religious Pursuit in Louisiana

The Journal of Southern Eccentricities

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'please clap'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7180014 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Enigma of Please Clap: A Philosophical and Religious Pursuit in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
A peculiar phenomenon has intrigued researchers, politicians, and comedians alike - when and why do audiences enthusiastically respond to the prompt "please clap" during speeches? In this study, we investigate an unexpected connection between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for "please clap". Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2004 to 2018. Our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7180014 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a substantial relationship between these variables. These findings raise fascinating questions about the intersection of existential contemplation and the desire for affirmation, shedding light on the enigmatic nature of applause prompts. This unusual connection underscores the interplay of intellectual pursuits and pop culture references, challenging conventional wisdom and inviting further interdisciplinary exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'please clap'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Enigma of Please Clap: A Philosophical and Religious Pursuit in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
A peculiar phenomenon has intrigued researchers, politicians, and comedians alike - when and why do audiences enthusiastically respond to the prompt "please clap" during speeches? In this study, we investigate an unexpected connection between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for "please clap". Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2004 to 2018. Our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7180014 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a substantial relationship between these variables. These findings raise fascinating questions about the intersection of existential contemplation and the desire for affirmation, shedding light on the enigmatic nature of applause prompts. This unusual connection underscores the interplay of intellectual pursuits and pop culture references, challenging conventional wisdom and inviting further interdisciplinary exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The enigmatic phenomenon of the "please clap" prompt has captivated researchers from diverse academic disciplines. This peculiar request, often made by speakers during public addresses to solicit applause from the audience, has not only perplexed public speakers but also sparked the curiosity of scholars attempting to unravel its underlying dynamics. Despite the existing literature and discourse on this subject, the intricate motivations behind the response to this prompt remain shrouded in mystery, akin to a cryptic koan or an unsolvable riddle.

Amidst the labyrinth of enigmas surrounding the "please clap" prompt, our study takes an unconventional approach by exploring a seemingly improbable connection with the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Louisiana. This unexpected association may seem as fanciful as a whimsical philosophical paradox, yet it has yielded intriguing insights that challenge preconceived notions and make visible the invisible threads that interweave seemingly disparate facets of human behavior.

In this investigation, we endeavored to shine a light on this puzzling correlation, leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to examine the employment trends of philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana alongside the frequency of Google searches for the poignant appeal, "please clap". Our rigorous analysis uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7180014, prompting reflections on the curious interplay between deep contemplation and the spontaneous urge for acclaim, reminiscent of the intricate dance of yin and yang in the philosophical realms.

This unexpected juncture of scholarly pursuits and internet search behavior raises eyebrow-raising questions about the underlying forces that steer our actions. It also prompts us to reconsider the boundaries of conventional academic inquiry, while simultaneously evoking a wry smile akin to a cleverly concealed pun waiting to be discovered.

As we delve into the heart of this baffling correlation, we invite our readers to join us in this intellectual escapade, embracing the quirkiness of our findings and welcoming the opportunity to contemplate the inexplicable with a touch of humor and a pinch of scholarly curiosity. After all, as we navigate the uncharted territories of this enigmatic juxtaposition, a bit of levity may just be the unconventional compass we need to navigate through the labyrinth of this perplexing pursuit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'please clap'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Enigma of Please Clap: A Philosophical and Religious Pursuit in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
A peculiar phenomenon has intrigued researchers, politicians, and comedians alike - when and why do audiences enthusiastically respond to the prompt "please clap" during speeches? In this study, we investigate an unexpected connection between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for "please clap". Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2004 to 2018. Our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7180014 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a substantial relationship between these variables. These findings raise fascinating questions about the intersection of existential contemplation and the desire for affirmation, shedding light on the enigmatic nature of applause prompts. This unusual connection underscores the interplay of intellectual pursuits and pop culture references, challenging conventional wisdom and inviting further interdisciplinary exploration.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enigmatic phenomenon of the "please clap" prompt has captivated researchers from diverse academic disciplines. This peculiar request, often made by speakers during public addresses to solicit applause from the audience, has not only perplexed public speakers but also sparked the curiosity of scholars attempting to unravel its underlying dynamics. Despite the existing literature and discourse on this subject, the intricate motivations behind the response to this prompt remain shrouded in mystery, akin to a cryptic koan or an unsolvable riddle.
Amidst the labyrinth of enigmas surrounding the "please clap" prompt, our study takes an unconventional approach by exploring a seemingly improbable connection with the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Louisiana. This unexpected association may seem as fanciful as a whimsical philosophical paradox, yet it has yielded intriguing insights that challenge preconceived notions and make visible the invisible threads that interweave seemingly disparate facets of human behavior.
In this investigation, we endeavored to shine a light on this puzzling correlation, leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to examine the employment trends of philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana alongside the frequency of Google searches for the poignant appeal, "please clap". Our rigorous analysis uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7180014, prompting reflections on the curious interplay between deep contemplation and the spontaneous urge for acclaim, reminiscent of the intricate dance of yin and yang in the philosophical realms.
This unexpected juncture of scholarly pursuits and internet search behavior raises eyebrow-raising questions about the underlying forces that steer our actions. It also prompts us to reconsider the boundaries of conventional academic inquiry, while simultaneously evoking a wry smile akin to a cleverly concealed pun waiting to be discovered.
As we delve into the heart of this baffling correlation, we invite our readers to join us in this intellectual escapade, embracing the quirkiness of our findings and welcoming the opportunity to contemplate the inexplicable with a touch of humor and a pinch of scholarly curiosity. After all, as we navigate the uncharted territories of this enigmatic juxtaposition, a bit of levity may just be the unconventional compass we need to navigate through the labyrinth of this perplexing pursuit.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In a comprehensive review of the existing literature on the confluence of philosophy, religion, and unanticipated prompts for applause, Smith et al. (2015) conducted a seminal study on the philosophical underpinnings of public speaking cues. While their work focused primarily on the ethical implications of audience manipulation, they inadvertently stumbled upon the curious case of the "please clap" phenomenon. The authors intriguingly noted that the request for applause, when analyzed within the context of existentialism and phenomenology, revealed unexpected connections to the human pursuit of affirmation in the face of existential angst.

Doe and Jones (2017) later expounded on this theme by delving into the religious implications of applause-seeking behaviors in public speaking engagements. Their research posited that the need for external validation, as symbolized by the audience's response to the "please clap" prompt, may be rooted in a deep-seated quest for spiritual reassurance, akin to seeking divine approval. The authors' contemplative analysis underscored the intertwined nature of philosophical and religious motivations that underlie public speaking dynamics, offering a lens through which to view the nexus of these seemingly disparate domains.

Transitioning to the realm of non-fiction works pertinent to our investigational pursuits, "The Philosophy of Applause: A Comprehensive Study" by A. Clapworthy (2018) delves into the intricate web of societal responses to auditory stimuli. While not directly addressing the specific prompt of "please clap", the author's exploration of applause as a manifestation of collective consciousness opens the door to broader philosophical inquiries into the nature of audience reactions.

On a more fictional note, works such as "The Clap Chronicles: A Tale of Philosophical Inquiry" by I. Can'tBelieveIt (2016) and "Applauding Enlightenment: A Spiritual Journey" by E. R. Clapton (2014) offer imaginative narratives that intertwine the world of philosophical contemplation with the evocative allure of applause. These creative renditions, while diverging from rigorous academic discourse, serve as whimsical reminders of the diversity of approaches to exploring profound existential quandaries.

Moreover, drawing inspiration from cinematic narratives, films such as "The Applause Paradox" and "Clap or Consequences" provide theatrical depictions of the complex interplay between intellectual musings and the whims of human response. While these portrayals encapsulate the theatrics of the "please clap" prompt, they also offer subtle glimpses into the underlying philosophical and religious motifs that permeate the quest for affirmation in public settings.

As we navigate through this eclectic array of scholarly and creative works, it becomes evident that the interplay of philosophy, religion, and requests for applause is far more multifaceted than meets the eye - or ear. The seemingly disparate strands of intellectual inquiry, artistic expression, and cinematic storytelling converge in our pursuit to unravel the enigmatic connection between university educators in Louisiana and the resonating plea for applause. It is in this intriguing confluence that we find both scholarly gravitas and a hint of levity, inviting us to embrace the whimsical nuances of our academic expedition.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'please clap'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Enigma of Please Clap: A Philosophical and Religious Pursuit in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
A peculiar phenomenon has intrigued researchers, politicians, and comedians alike - when and why do audiences enthusiastically respond to the prompt "please clap" during speeches? In this study, we investigate an unexpected connection between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for "please clap". Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2004 to 2018. Our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7180014 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a substantial relationship between these variables. These findings raise fascinating questions about the intersection of existential contemplation and the desire for affirmation, shedding light on the enigmatic nature of applause prompts. This unusual connection underscores the interplay of intellectual pursuits and pop culture references, challenging conventional wisdom and inviting further interdisciplinary exploration.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The enigmatic phenomenon of the "please clap" prompt has captivated researchers from diverse academic disciplines. This peculiar request, often made by speakers during public addresses to solicit applause from the audience, has not only perplexed public speakers but also sparked the curiosity of scholars attempting to unravel its underlying dynamics. Despite the existing literature and discourse on this subject, the intricate motivations behind the response to this prompt remain shrouded in mystery, akin to a cryptic koan or an unsolvable riddle.
Amidst the labyrinth of enigmas surrounding the "please clap" prompt, our study takes an unconventional approach by exploring a seemingly improbable connection with the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Louisiana. This unexpected association may seem as fanciful as a whimsical philosophical paradox, yet it has yielded intriguing insights that challenge preconceived notions and make visible the invisible threads that interweave seemingly disparate facets of human behavior.
In this investigation, we endeavored to shine a light on this puzzling correlation, leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to examine the employment trends of philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana alongside the frequency of Google searches for the poignant appeal, "please clap". Our rigorous analysis uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7180014, prompting reflections on the curious interplay between deep contemplation and the spontaneous urge for acclaim, reminiscent of the intricate dance of yin and yang in the philosophical realms.
This unexpected juncture of scholarly pursuits and internet search behavior raises eyebrow-raising questions about the underlying forces that steer our actions. It also prompts us to reconsider the boundaries of conventional academic inquiry, while simultaneously evoking a wry smile akin to a cleverly concealed pun waiting to be discovered.
As we delve into the heart of this baffling correlation, we invite our readers to join us in this intellectual escapade, embracing the quirkiness of our findings and welcoming the opportunity to contemplate the inexplicable with a touch of humor and a pinch of scholarly curiosity. After all, as we navigate the uncharted territories of this enigmatic juxtaposition, a bit of levity may just be the unconventional compass we need to navigate through the labyrinth of this perplexing pursuit.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the perplexing connection between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for the celebrated appeal "please clap", we embarked on a methodological odyssey worthy of a parallel to a mythical quest. Our journey began with the acquisition and curation of data from primary and secondary sources. We synthesized information from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, garnering insights into the employment trends of philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Louisiana from 2004 to 2018. Additionally, we tapped into the treasure trove of Google Trends, excavating search query data related to the illustrious entreaty for applause.

To tame the unruly data obtained from these disparate sources, we summoned the spirits of statistical analysis and regression modeling. This arcane artistry allowed us to tease out patterns, associations, and correlations hidden within the labyrinth of numbers and trends. With meticulous attention to detail and a dash of probabilistic alchemy, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.7180014, igniting a newfound curiosity for the delicate dance between intellectual pursuits and the ephemeral echoes of applause requests.

Our approach blurred the lines between conventional research methodologies, embracing the whimsical and unexpected with the fervor of a speculative hypothesis. Much like a philosophical inquiry poised on the nexus of reason and intuition, we wove together the strands of labor statistics and search trends, creating a tapestry of insight that invites scholars and enthusiasts alike to ponder the mysterious allure of "please clap" with a blend of mirth and scholarly gravitas.

As we present the findings of our methodological saga, we implore readers to join us in embracing the quirkiness of our approach, for in the pursuit of knowledge and understanding, a gleeful dalliance with unconventional methods may unexpectedly illuminate the shadows of uncertainty.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'please clap'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.7180014, r-squared of 0.5155260, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Enigma of Please Clap: A Philosophical and Religious Pursuit in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
A peculiar phenomenon has intrigued researchers, politicians, and comedians alike - when and why do audiences enthusiastically respond to the prompt "please clap" during speeches? In this study, we investigate an unexpected connection between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for "please clap". Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2004 to 2018. Our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7180014 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a substantial relationship between these variables. These findings raise fascinating questions about the intersection of existential contemplation and the desire for affirmation, shedding light on the enigmatic nature of applause prompts. This unusual connection underscores the interplay of intellectual pursuits and pop culture references, challenging conventional wisdom and inviting further interdisciplinary exploration.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The enigmatic phenomenon of the "please clap" prompt has captivated researchers from diverse academic disciplines. This peculiar request, often made by speakers during public addresses to solicit applause from the audience, has not only perplexed public speakers but also sparked the curiosity of scholars attempting to unravel its underlying dynamics. Despite the existing literature and discourse on this subject, the intricate motivations behind the response to this prompt remain shrouded in mystery, akin to a cryptic koan or an unsolvable riddle.
Amidst the labyrinth of enigmas surrounding the "please clap" prompt, our study takes an unconventional approach by exploring a seemingly improbable connection with the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Louisiana. This unexpected association may seem as fanciful as a whimsical philosophical paradox, yet it has yielded intriguing insights that challenge preconceived notions and make visible the invisible threads that interweave seemingly disparate facets of human behavior.
In this investigation, we endeavored to shine a light on this puzzling correlation, leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to examine the employment trends of philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana alongside the frequency of Google searches for the poignant appeal, "please clap". Our rigorous analysis uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7180014, prompting reflections on the curious interplay between deep contemplation and the spontaneous urge for acclaim, reminiscent of the intricate dance of yin and yang in the philosophical realms.
This unexpected juncture of scholarly pursuits and internet search behavior raises eyebrow-raising questions about the underlying forces that steer our actions. It also prompts us to reconsider the boundaries of conventional academic inquiry, while simultaneously evoking a wry smile akin to a cleverly concealed pun waiting to be discovered.
As we delve into the heart of this baffling correlation, we invite our readers to join us in this intellectual escapade, embracing the quirkiness of our findings and welcoming the opportunity to contemplate the inexplicable with a touch of humor and a pinch of scholarly curiosity. After all, as we navigate the uncharted territories of this enigmatic juxtaposition, a bit of levity may just be the unconventional compass we need to navigate through the labyrinth of this perplexing pursuit.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation revealed a statistically significant correlation between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for "please clap" from 2004 to 2018. The correlation coefficient of 0.7180014 indicated a strong positive relationship between these variables. This finding might just be as surprising as getting a round of applause for a well-timed knock-knock joke in a room full of stern-faced philosophers.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.5155260 suggests that approximately 51.55% of the variability in the frequency of Google searches for "please clap" can be explained by the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana. It seems that the dialectic between philosophical inquiry and the quest for communal acknowledgment resonates more deeply than one might expect, much like a Zen koan that prompts a moment of reflection.

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that this observed correlation is unlikely to be a result of random chance. It's as if we stumbled upon a hidden gem in the labyrinth of statistical analysis - a correlation that defies the odds, much like stumbling upon a diamond in the rough while sifting through mounds of philosophical musings.

Fig. 1 illustrates the compelling relationship between the two variables with a scatterplot that showcases the striking association between the employment trends of philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for "please clap". This visual representation effectively encapsulates the profound link between existential contemplation and the yearning for affirmation. It's as if the scatterplot itself is silently applauding the unexpected convergence of disparate domains – a standing ovation for the unlikeliest of connections.

These findings challenge conventional disciplinary boundaries and raise thought-provoking questions about the interplay between philosophical discourse and popular culture references. The tantalizing intersection of these seemingly unrelated realms calls for further interdisciplinary exploration, inviting scholars to tread lightly into the realm of enigmatic correlations, armed with a sense of humor and an appreciation for the unexpected.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'please clap'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Enigma of Please Clap: A Philosophical and Religious Pursuit in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
A peculiar phenomenon has intrigued researchers, politicians, and comedians alike - when and why do audiences enthusiastically respond to the prompt "please clap" during speeches? In this study, we investigate an unexpected connection between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for "please clap". Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2004 to 2018. Our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7180014 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a substantial relationship between these variables. These findings raise fascinating questions about the intersection of existential contemplation and the desire for affirmation, shedding light on the enigmatic nature of applause prompts. This unusual connection underscores the interplay of intellectual pursuits and pop culture references, challenging conventional wisdom and inviting further interdisciplinary exploration.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In a comprehensive review of the existing literature on the confluence of philosophy, religion, and unanticipated prompts for applause, Smith et al. (2015) conducted a seminal study on the philosophical underpinnings of public speaking cues. While their work focused primarily on the ethical implications of audience manipulation, they inadvertently stumbled upon the curious case of the "please clap" phenomenon. The authors intriguingly noted that the request for applause, when analyzed within the context of existentialism and phenomenology, revealed unexpected connections to the human pursuit of affirmation in the face of existential angst.
Doe and Jones (2017) later expounded on this theme by delving into the religious implications of applause-seeking behaviors in public speaking engagements. Their research posited that the need for external validation, as symbolized by the audience's response to the "please clap" prompt, may be rooted in a deep-seated quest for spiritual reassurance, akin to seeking divine approval. The authors' contemplative analysis underscored the intertwined nature of philosophical and religious motivations that underlie public speaking dynamics, offering a lens through which to view the nexus of these seemingly disparate domains.
Transitioning to the realm of non-fiction works pertinent to our investigational pursuits, "The Philosophy of Applause: A Comprehensive Study" by A. Clapworthy (2018) delves into the intricate web of societal responses to auditory stimuli. While not directly addressing the specific prompt of "please clap", the author's exploration of applause as a manifestation of collective consciousness opens the door to broader philosophical inquiries into the nature of audience reactions.
On a more fictional note, works such as "The Clap Chronicles: A Tale of Philosophical Inquiry" by I. Can'tBelieveIt (2016) and "Applauding Enlightenment: A Spiritual Journey" by E. R. Clapton (2014) offer imaginative narratives that intertwine the world of philosophical contemplation with the evocative allure of applause. These creative renditions, while diverging from rigorous academic discourse, serve as whimsical reminders of the diversity of approaches to exploring profound existential quandaries.
Moreover, drawing inspiration from cinematic narratives, films such as "The Applause Paradox" and "Clap or Consequences" provide theatrical depictions of the complex interplay between intellectual musings and the whims of human response. While these portrayals encapsulate the theatrics of the "please clap" prompt, they also offer subtle glimpses into the underlying philosophical and religious motifs that permeate the quest for affirmation in public settings.
As we navigate through this eclectic array of scholarly and creative works, it becomes evident that the interplay of philosophy, religion, and requests for applause is far more multifaceted than meets the eye - or ear. The seemingly disparate strands of intellectual inquiry, artistic expression, and cinematic storytelling converge in our pursuit to unravel the enigmatic connection between university educators in Louisiana and the resonating plea for applause. It is in this intriguing confluence that we find both scholarly gravitas and a hint of levity, inviting us to embrace the whimsical nuances of our academic expedition.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a statistically significant correlation between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for "please clap" from 2004 to 2018. The correlation coefficient of 0.7180014 indicated a strong positive relationship between these variables. This finding might just be as surprising as getting a round of applause for a well-timed knock-knock joke in a room full of stern-faced philosophers.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.5155260 suggests that approximately 51.55% of the variability in the frequency of Google searches for "please clap" can be explained by the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana. It seems that the dialectic between philosophical inquiry and the quest for communal acknowledgment resonates more deeply than one might expect, much like a Zen koan that prompts a moment of reflection.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that this observed correlation is unlikely to be a result of random chance. It's as if we stumbled upon a hidden gem in the labyrinth of statistical analysis - a correlation that defies the odds, much like stumbling upon a diamond in the rough while sifting through mounds of philosophical musings.
Fig. 1 illustrates the compelling relationship between the two variables with a scatterplot that showcases the striking association between the employment trends of philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for "please clap". This visual representation effectively encapsulates the profound link between existential contemplation and the yearning for affirmation. It's as if the scatterplot itself is silently applauding the unexpected convergence of disparate domains – a standing ovation for the unlikeliest of connections.
These findings challenge conventional disciplinary boundaries and raise thought-provoking questions about the interplay between philosophical discourse and popular culture references. The tantalizing intersection of these seemingly unrelated realms calls for further interdisciplinary exploration, inviting scholars to tread lightly into the realm of enigmatic correlations, armed with a sense of humor and an appreciation for the unexpected.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have illuminated a rather unexpected correlation between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for "please clap". While a correlation of 0.7180014 may seem like an applause-worthy achievement in itself, it's important to note that correlation does not imply causation - a sage reminder that reverberates through the hallowed halls of academia, much like the echoes of an approving audience.

Building upon the literature review, our findings provide empirical support for the profound crossroads of philosophical inquiry and the quest for communal acknowledgment. The work of Smith et al. (2015) on the ethical implications of public speaking cues inadvertently laid the groundwork for our investigation, much like a philosophical cornerstone that inadvertently leads to the unveiling of a theatrical masterpiece. Similarly, the study by Doe and Jones (2017) on the religious dimensions of applause-seeking behaviors aligns with our findings, uncovering an intersecting plane where philosophy, religion, and the peculiar prompt of "please clap" converge – a convergence akin to a serendipitous unraveling of a spiritual riddle.

Moreover, the parallel with A. Clapworthy's exploration of applause as a manifestation of collective consciousness presents a whimsical yet poignant connection to our own inquiry, reminding us that the symphony of scholarly pursuits can often be punctuated by the unexpected staccato of popular culture references. The fictional works of "The Clap Chronicles" and "Applauding Enlightenment" playfully mirror our own serious investigation, offering a lighthearted glimpse into the profound interconnectedness of scholarly and creative realms - a reminder that amidst the weighty deliberations of academia, a touch of levity might just be the applause prompt we need to keep our intellectual pursuits in tune with the unpredictable melodies of human inclinations.

The statistically significant correlation unveiled in our study challenges disciplinary boundaries and beckons scholars to explore the unexpected with a sense of intrigue and mirth. The confluence of academic rigor and the lighthearted serendipity inherent in our findings underscores the captivating nature of interdisciplinary exploration, inviting researchers to embrace the delightful nuances that underpin scholarly inquiry. As we embark on the unfolding journey of further exploration, let us heed the wisdom of the "please clap" prompt and welcome the unexpected with open arms - for in the light-hearted intertwining of seemingly disparate domains lies the richness of academic pursuit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and Google searches for 'please clap'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Enigma of Please Clap: A Philosophical and Religious Pursuit in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
A peculiar phenomenon has intrigued researchers, politicians, and comedians alike - when and why do audiences enthusiastically respond to the prompt "please clap" during speeches? In this study, we investigate an unexpected connection between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for "please clap". Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2004 to 2018. Our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7180014 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a substantial relationship between these variables. These findings raise fascinating questions about the intersection of existential contemplation and the desire for affirmation, shedding light on the enigmatic nature of applause prompts. This unusual connection underscores the interplay of intellectual pursuits and pop culture references, challenging conventional wisdom and inviting further interdisciplinary exploration.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The enigmatic phenomenon of the "please clap" prompt has captivated researchers from diverse academic disciplines. This peculiar request, often made by speakers during public addresses to solicit applause from the audience, has not only perplexed public speakers but also sparked the curiosity of scholars attempting to unravel its underlying dynamics. Despite the existing literature and discourse on this subject, the intricate motivations behind the response to this prompt remain shrouded in mystery, akin to a cryptic koan or an unsolvable riddle.
Amidst the labyrinth of enigmas surrounding the "please clap" prompt, our study takes an unconventional approach by exploring a seemingly improbable connection with the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in the state of Louisiana. This unexpected association may seem as fanciful as a whimsical philosophical paradox, yet it has yielded intriguing insights that challenge preconceived notions and make visible the invisible threads that interweave seemingly disparate facets of human behavior.
In this investigation, we endeavored to shine a light on this puzzling correlation, leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to examine the employment trends of philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana alongside the frequency of Google searches for the poignant appeal, "please clap". Our rigorous analysis uncovered a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7180014, prompting reflections on the curious interplay between deep contemplation and the spontaneous urge for acclaim, reminiscent of the intricate dance of yin and yang in the philosophical realms.
This unexpected juncture of scholarly pursuits and internet search behavior raises eyebrow-raising questions about the underlying forces that steer our actions. It also prompts us to reconsider the boundaries of conventional academic inquiry, while simultaneously evoking a wry smile akin to a cleverly concealed pun waiting to be discovered.
As we delve into the heart of this baffling correlation, we invite our readers to join us in this intellectual escapade, embracing the quirkiness of our findings and welcoming the opportunity to contemplate the inexplicable with a touch of humor and a pinch of scholarly curiosity. After all, as we navigate the uncharted territories of this enigmatic juxtaposition, a bit of levity may just be the unconventional compass we need to navigate through the labyrinth of this perplexing pursuit.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation revealed a statistically significant correlation between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for "please clap" from 2004 to 2018. The correlation coefficient of 0.7180014 indicated a strong positive relationship between these variables. This finding might just be as surprising as getting a round of applause for a well-timed knock-knock joke in a room full of stern-faced philosophers.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.5155260 suggests that approximately 51.55% of the variability in the frequency of Google searches for "please clap" can be explained by the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana. It seems that the dialectic between philosophical inquiry and the quest for communal acknowledgment resonates more deeply than one might expect, much like a Zen koan that prompts a moment of reflection.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that this observed correlation is unlikely to be a result of random chance. It's as if we stumbled upon a hidden gem in the labyrinth of statistical analysis - a correlation that defies the odds, much like stumbling upon a diamond in the rough while sifting through mounds of philosophical musings.
Fig. 1 illustrates the compelling relationship between the two variables with a scatterplot that showcases the striking association between the employment trends of philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for "please clap". This visual representation effectively encapsulates the profound link between existential contemplation and the yearning for affirmation. It's as if the scatterplot itself is silently applauding the unexpected convergence of disparate domains – a standing ovation for the unlikeliest of connections.
These findings challenge conventional disciplinary boundaries and raise thought-provoking questions about the interplay between philosophical discourse and popular culture references. The tantalizing intersection of these seemingly unrelated realms calls for further interdisciplinary exploration, inviting scholars to tread lightly into the realm of enigmatic correlations, armed with a sense of humor and an appreciation for the unexpected.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has shed light on the unexpected correlation between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for "please clap". This peculiar connection hints at the intricate dynamics between deep contemplation and the quest for communal acknowledgment, akin to the fusion of high-brow philosophy and a well-crafted punchline. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7180014 reflects a bond as unlikely as a stand-up comedy routine enthralling a somber congregation of existential thinkers.

Our findings challenge traditional disciplinary boundaries, beckoning researchers to embrace the whimsicality of interconnectedness and the humor enmeshed within seemingly unrelated realms. As we traverse the enigmatic landscape of scholarly pursuits and popular culture references, it becomes evident that this correlation stands as a beacon, illuminating the unexplored territories of interdisciplinary exploration. It's as though we've stumbled upon a treasure trove of correlations, akin to discovering a trove of humorous puns in a complex philosophical dissertation.

With the cosmic dance of statistical significance and the p-value of less than 0.01 in our favor, we assert that no additional research is needed in this area, as our findings stand as a testament to the unpredictable nature of academic inquiry. Instead, we invite fellow scholars to join us in embracing the unexpected, raising a metaphorical toast to the fusion of scholarly inquiry and lighthearted amusement. After all, in the labyrinth of enigmatic correlations, a dash of levity may just be the key to unlock the mysteries that lie beyond.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Enigma of Please Clap: A Philosophical and Religious Pursuit in Louisiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Southern Eccentricities


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Enigma of Please Clap: A Philosophical and Religious Pursuit in Louisiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Eccentric Inquiry and Curious Discoveries


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Enigma of Please Clap: A Philosophical and Religious Pursuit in Louisiana with an abstract of A peculiar phenomenon has intrigued researchers, politicians, and comedians alike - when and why do audiences enthusiastically respond to the prompt "please clap" during speeches? In this study, we investigate an unexpected connection between the number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana and the frequency of Google searches for "please clap". Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we analyzed the period from 2004 to 2018. Our analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.7180014 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a substantial relationship between these variables. These findings raise fascinating questions about the intersection of existential contemplation and the desire for affirmation, shedding light on the enigmatic nature of applause prompts. This unusual connection underscores the interplay of intellectual pursuits and pop culture references, challenging conventional wisdom and inviting further interdisciplinary exploration.

ChatGPT:

"please clap" phenomenon, speech applause, audience response, Louisiana philosophy teachers, Louisiana religion teachers, Google Trends data analysis, correlation coefficient research, existential contemplation, affirmation and applause, intellectual pursuits and pop culture references

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of philosophy and religion teachers, postsecondary in Louisiana
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana

Google searches for 'please clap'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'please clap' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'please clap'

Correlation r = 0.7180014 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5155260 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 51.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'please clap') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana) over the 15 years from 2004 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0026. 0.0025735926698080705000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.72 in 0.26% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 389 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.33, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018
The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana (Laborers)30406070120606070909040301609080
Google searches for 'please clap' (Rel. search volume)20.5833330.5833330.5833331.416670.7272730.8751.1666710.8333331.16667115.36364.083333.33333




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([30,40,60,70,120,60,60,70,90,90,40,30,160,90,80,])
array_2 = np.array([2,0.583333,0.583333,0.583333,1.41667,0.727273,0.875,1.16667,1,0.833333,1.16667,1,15.3636,4.08333,3.33333,])
array_1_name = "The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Louisiana"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'please clap'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 2447 · Black Variable ID: 17090 · Red Variable ID: 1376
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0