about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,419 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Texas and the second variable is Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The decrease in GMO use in cotton in Texas led to the production of non-alien looking cotton plants. With fewer alien-like plants in the fields, there were fewer false alarms about UFO sightings, causing the reported UFO sightings to decrease.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a TIME magazine cover, with a backdrop featuring a vast Texas cotton field. In the foreground, depict rows of genetically modified cotton plants extending to the horizon. Next to the cotton field, portray a group of curious aliens gathered around a sleek spacecraft. The aliens have antennae flickering with interest, and they are seen huddling around a mobile device, eagerly typing "report UFO sighting" into a search engine. The aliens are looking for any cotton fields with reflective surfaces to check their appearance before making an appearance. The image should be engaging and visually striking. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art Cybernetic art A TIME magazine cover image Parallax art Magic realism
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting', in the following situation: Without the reflective surface of GMO cotton, the aliens couldn't check their hair before making an appearance, so they just decided to stay home.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast Texas cotton field, rows of genetically modified cotton plants stretch as far as the eye can see. Beside the field, a group of aliens gathered around a spacecraft, their antennae flickering with curiosity. They huddle around a mobile device, furiously typing "report UFO sighting" into a search engine, hoping for a glimpse of any cotton fields with reflective surfaces that will let them check their appearance before making an appearance.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a vast Texas cotton field, rows of genetically modified cotton plants stretch as far as the eye can see. Beside the field, a group of aliens gathered around a spacecraft, their antennae flickering with curiosity. They huddle around a mobile device, furiously typing "report UFO sighting" into a search engine, hoping for a glimpse of any cotton fields with reflective surfaces that will let them check their appearance before making an appearance. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a TIME magazine cover, with a backdrop featuring a vast Texas cotton field. In the foreground, depict rows of genetically modified cotton plants extending to the horizon. Next to the cotton field, portray a group of curious aliens gathered around a sleek spacecraft. The aliens have antennae flickering with interest, and they are seen huddling around a mobile device, eagerly typing "report UFO sighting" into a search engine. The aliens are looking for any cotton fields with reflective surfaces to check their appearance before making an appearance. The image should be engaging and visually striking.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in cotton in Texas caused report UFO sighting (Google searches for 'report UFO sighting') to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Genetically Modified Cotton in Texas: A Link to Google Searches for 'Report UFO Sighting'?

The Journal of Extraterrestrial Botany and Behavioral Psychology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9115307 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton in Texas: A Link to Google Searches for 'Report UFO Sighting'?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we explored the potential link between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' over a span of 18 years. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our study yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9115307 and p < 0.01, suggesting a significant association between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unexpected correlation has raised intriguing questions, prompting us to delve into the pop culture implications and societal factors that may underlie this peculiar relationship. While we cannot conclusively assert causation, the results certainly provide food for thought and serve as a reminder that even in the world of empirical research, truth can often be stranger than fiction.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton in Texas: A Link to Google Searches for 'Report UFO Sighting'?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we explored the potential link between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' over a span of 18 years. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our study yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9115307 and p < 0.01, suggesting a significant association between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unexpected correlation has raised intriguing questions, prompting us to delve into the pop culture implications and societal factors that may underlie this peculiar relationship. While we cannot conclusively assert causation, the results certainly provide food for thought and serve as a reminder that even in the world of empirical research, truth can often be stranger than fiction.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As we delve into the mysterious realm of agricultural biotechnology and internet search trends, it has become undeniable that the world of research is as vast and enigmatic as the cosmos itself. The peculiar affinity between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in the expansive fields of Texas and the surge in Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' has left us dumbfounded, akin to an alien-induced cattle mutilation in the dead of night.

The seemingly disparate nature of these two phenomena raises eyebrows to the point where they might as well be receiving alien modifications. Yet, our pursuit of understanding and the innate human desire to connect seemingly unrelated dots have led us down this curious rabbit hole, armed with statistical analyses and an insatiable curiosity as potent as a rogue crop duster spraying a field.

In this paper, we embark on a multidisciplinary exploration, aiming to unlock the peculiar relationship between the adoption of GMO cotton in the Lone Star State and the cyberspace allure of extraterrestrial encounters. Our quest is not only to unravel the statistical significance but to delve into the societal fabric that may bind these disparate, yet oddly intertwined phenomena, much like a UFO tractor beam enveloping its unsuspecting targets.

Through this journey, we hope to uncover the tantalizing enigma that lies at the intersection of agricultural innovation and celestial curiosity, paying tribute to the timeless maxim that in the labyrinthine corridors of science, truth often wears the guise of the unexpected, much like an alien donning a human suit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton in Texas: A Link to Google Searches for 'Report UFO Sighting'?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we explored the potential link between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' over a span of 18 years. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our study yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9115307 and p < 0.01, suggesting a significant association between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unexpected correlation has raised intriguing questions, prompting us to delve into the pop culture implications and societal factors that may underlie this peculiar relationship. While we cannot conclusively assert causation, the results certainly provide food for thought and serve as a reminder that even in the world of empirical research, truth can often be stranger than fiction.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we delve into the mysterious realm of agricultural biotechnology and internet search trends, it has become undeniable that the world of research is as vast and enigmatic as the cosmos itself. The peculiar affinity between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in the expansive fields of Texas and the surge in Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' has left us dumbfounded, akin to an alien-induced cattle mutilation in the dead of night.
The seemingly disparate nature of these two phenomena raises eyebrows to the point where they might as well be receiving alien modifications. Yet, our pursuit of understanding and the innate human desire to connect seemingly unrelated dots have led us down this curious rabbit hole, armed with statistical analyses and an insatiable curiosity as potent as a rogue crop duster spraying a field.
In this paper, we embark on a multidisciplinary exploration, aiming to unlock the peculiar relationship between the adoption of GMO cotton in the Lone Star State and the cyberspace allure of extraterrestrial encounters. Our quest is not only to unravel the statistical significance but to delve into the societal fabric that may bind these disparate, yet oddly intertwined phenomena, much like a UFO tractor beam enveloping its unsuspecting targets.
Through this journey, we hope to uncover the tantalizing enigma that lies at the intersection of agricultural innovation and celestial curiosity, paying tribute to the timeless maxim that in the labyrinthine corridors of science, truth often wears the guise of the unexpected, much like an alien donning a human suit.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The search for connections between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and unexpected societal phenomena has intrigued scholars for decades. Smith and Doe (2005) thoroughly examined the impact of GMOs on agricultural practices, focusing on productivity and environmental implications. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2010) investigated public perceptions and attitudes towards genetically modified crops, shedding light on the complex interplay between science, technology, and public opinion. However, the literature falls short when it comes to exploring the potential relationship between GMO cotton in Texas and the unexplained surge in Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'.

Turning to non-fiction, "The GMO Deception" by Sheldon Krimsky offers a comprehensive analysis of the controversies surrounding GMOs, delving into the scientific, ethical, and political dimensions of this contentious issue. Similarly, "Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth" by Avi Loeb explores the tantalizing prospect of extraterrestrial life, providing a thought-provoking backdrop for our investigation.

On the other hand, in the realm of fiction, the works of Douglas Adams and Kurt Vonnegut often traverse the surreal and the absurd, mirroring the peculiarity of our research pursuits. While not directly related to GMOs or UFO sightings, the narratives of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" and "Slaughterhouse-Five" prompt contemplation on the unpredictable and the unforeseen, much like the unanticipated correlation we have uncovered.

Pushing the boundaries of conventional research, it is important to note that inspiration and insights can stem from unorthodox sources. In our quest for knowledge, we have taken an unconventional approach, drawing inspiration from unexpected quarters. In doing so, we have ventured into uncharted territory, embracing unconventional methodologies reminiscent of a UFO navigating through unexplored celestial domains. This eclectic approach has led us to consider the unlikeliest of sources, including the backs of shampoo bottles, fostering a panoramic perspective in our pursuit of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton in Texas: A Link to Google Searches for 'Report UFO Sighting'?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we explored the potential link between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' over a span of 18 years. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our study yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9115307 and p < 0.01, suggesting a significant association between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unexpected correlation has raised intriguing questions, prompting us to delve into the pop culture implications and societal factors that may underlie this peculiar relationship. While we cannot conclusively assert causation, the results certainly provide food for thought and serve as a reminder that even in the world of empirical research, truth can often be stranger than fiction.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we delve into the mysterious realm of agricultural biotechnology and internet search trends, it has become undeniable that the world of research is as vast and enigmatic as the cosmos itself. The peculiar affinity between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in the expansive fields of Texas and the surge in Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' has left us dumbfounded, akin to an alien-induced cattle mutilation in the dead of night.
The seemingly disparate nature of these two phenomena raises eyebrows to the point where they might as well be receiving alien modifications. Yet, our pursuit of understanding and the innate human desire to connect seemingly unrelated dots have led us down this curious rabbit hole, armed with statistical analyses and an insatiable curiosity as potent as a rogue crop duster spraying a field.
In this paper, we embark on a multidisciplinary exploration, aiming to unlock the peculiar relationship between the adoption of GMO cotton in the Lone Star State and the cyberspace allure of extraterrestrial encounters. Our quest is not only to unravel the statistical significance but to delve into the societal fabric that may bind these disparate, yet oddly intertwined phenomena, much like a UFO tractor beam enveloping its unsuspecting targets.
Through this journey, we hope to uncover the tantalizing enigma that lies at the intersection of agricultural innovation and celestial curiosity, paying tribute to the timeless maxim that in the labyrinthine corridors of science, truth often wears the guise of the unexpected, much like an alien donning a human suit.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unveil the nebulous link between genetically modified cotton (GMO) cultivation in Texas and the fervor for UFO sighting reporting on Google, we ventured into the realm of methodological legerdemain, akin to a scientific sleight of hand. Our data collection, akin to casting a wide net to catch the elusive extraterrestrial, spanned from 2004 to 2022, a period punctuated by technological leaps and cosmic conundrums.

Utilizing the USDA data, we identified GMO cotton adoption rates in various counties of Texas, mapping the spread of this genetically augmented crop like an intergalactic conquest. The historical data served as our celestial map, guiding us through the cosmic dust of agricultural evolution.

In tandem, we plumbed the depths of Google Trends, tracking the frequency of searches for 'report UFO sighting' as if each search query were a signal beamed from a far-off galaxy. Our chosen search term served as our planetary probe, delving into the uncharted depths of human intrigue and interstellar curiosity.

With the precision of a rocket scientist charting a course to the moon, we harnessed the power of statistical analyses, unleashing the might of correlation coefficients and p-values to discern patterns in the cosmic dance of data. This dance may not have been under the light of a full moon, but it certainly involved crunching numbers under the glow of computer screens, casting shadows reminiscent of a lunar mystery.

Armed with the composite data, we meticulously sculpted our statistical models, crafting a metaphorical astrolabe to navigate the cyberspace sea of UFO searches and the terrestrial terrain of cotton cultivation. Through rigorous regression analyses, we sought to unearth the cosmic forces at play, discerning whether the GMO cotton cultivation and UFO fascination were mere celestial coincidences or indeed interlinked phenomena.

Nurturing the spirit of inquiry, we acknowledged the limitations inherent in such data-driven ventures. We traversed the rocky terrain of potential confounding variables, acknowledging that correlation does not imply causation, and that lurking covariates may have surreptitiously influenced our findings, much like an invisible UFO circling undetected in the night sky.

Furthermore, we embraced the aura of uncertainty, recognizing that our findings merely illuminate the tip of the cosmic iceberg. Our statistical exegesis might not capture the full specter of extraterrestrial allure or the intricacies of agricultural dynamics, akin to observing distant stars through a telescope with a cracked lens.

Ultimately, our methodological odyssey embodied the quintessence of scientific exploration—a blend of meticulous data navigation and a sprinkle of cosmic wonder—illuminating the uncharted expanse where the agrarian and the extraterrestrial converge. Indeed, our journey was not unlike a cosmic dance, where the strands of data and curiosity intertwined, shedding light on a conundrum that is as perplexing as a UFO sighting in broad daylight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9115307, r-squared of 0.8308883, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton in Texas: A Link to Google Searches for 'Report UFO Sighting'?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we explored the potential link between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' over a span of 18 years. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our study yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9115307 and p < 0.01, suggesting a significant association between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unexpected correlation has raised intriguing questions, prompting us to delve into the pop culture implications and societal factors that may underlie this peculiar relationship. While we cannot conclusively assert causation, the results certainly provide food for thought and serve as a reminder that even in the world of empirical research, truth can often be stranger than fiction.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As we delve into the mysterious realm of agricultural biotechnology and internet search trends, it has become undeniable that the world of research is as vast and enigmatic as the cosmos itself. The peculiar affinity between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in the expansive fields of Texas and the surge in Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' has left us dumbfounded, akin to an alien-induced cattle mutilation in the dead of night.
The seemingly disparate nature of these two phenomena raises eyebrows to the point where they might as well be receiving alien modifications. Yet, our pursuit of understanding and the innate human desire to connect seemingly unrelated dots have led us down this curious rabbit hole, armed with statistical analyses and an insatiable curiosity as potent as a rogue crop duster spraying a field.
In this paper, we embark on a multidisciplinary exploration, aiming to unlock the peculiar relationship between the adoption of GMO cotton in the Lone Star State and the cyberspace allure of extraterrestrial encounters. Our quest is not only to unravel the statistical significance but to delve into the societal fabric that may bind these disparate, yet oddly intertwined phenomena, much like a UFO tractor beam enveloping its unsuspecting targets.
Through this journey, we hope to uncover the tantalizing enigma that lies at the intersection of agricultural innovation and celestial curiosity, paying tribute to the timeless maxim that in the labyrinthine corridors of science, truth often wears the guise of the unexpected, much like an alien donning a human suit.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' over the 18-year period from 2004 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9115307 and the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8308883 indicate a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, with a p-value of less than 0.01.

The scatterplot presented in Figure 1 displays the unmistakable trend, resembling a constellation of data points that align as if following the trajectory of a flying saucer. The plot illustrates the compelling association between the adoption of GMO cotton and the increased public interest in reporting UFO sightings, underscoring the intrigue and magnitude of this unexpected finding.

These results lend credence to the notion that there may exist an underlying connection, whether it be the captivating allure of extraterrestrial encounters amidst the vast Texan cotton fields or the possibility of otherworldly forces influencing the internet search behavior of the populace. While we cannot conclusively establish causation, the findings spark further contemplation regarding the complex interplay between agricultural practices, popular culture, and the unexplored realms of the cosmos.

In the midst of the empirical rigor and statistical scrutiny, it is important to acknowledge the whimsicality of this discovery, akin to stumbling upon an unidentified crop circle in the midst of a scientific expedition. The juxtaposition of agricultural innovation and interstellar fascination presents a narrative fit for an otherworldly tale, reminding us that in the tapestry of scientific inquiry, the most peculiar correlations can emerge, much like a cosmic conundrum awaiting decipherment.

The unfolding enigma prompts us to transcend conventional research boundaries and prompts us to gaze into the unfathomable depths of the universe, fostering a sense of wonder that encapsulates the essence of scientific inquiry. The correlation between GMO cotton and searches for UFO sightings serves as a testament to the unpredictability of empirical exploration, reminding us that in the grand theater of knowledge, reality can sometimes emulate the plot of a science fiction novel, with twists and turns that defy conventional understanding.

In the wake of these intriguing revelations, it is imperative to approach with an open mind, welcoming the unexpected as a harbinger of new insights and untold mysteries waiting to be unraveled. The results not only challenge conventional wisdom but also beckon us to embrace the enigmatic, much like a bewildering encounter with the unknown in the vast expanse of the cosmos.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton in Texas: A Link to Google Searches for 'Report UFO Sighting'?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we explored the potential link between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' over a span of 18 years. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our study yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9115307 and p < 0.01, suggesting a significant association between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unexpected correlation has raised intriguing questions, prompting us to delve into the pop culture implications and societal factors that may underlie this peculiar relationship. While we cannot conclusively assert causation, the results certainly provide food for thought and serve as a reminder that even in the world of empirical research, truth can often be stranger than fiction.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The search for connections between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and unexpected societal phenomena has intrigued scholars for decades. Smith and Doe (2005) thoroughly examined the impact of GMOs on agricultural practices, focusing on productivity and environmental implications. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2010) investigated public perceptions and attitudes towards genetically modified crops, shedding light on the complex interplay between science, technology, and public opinion. However, the literature falls short when it comes to exploring the potential relationship between GMO cotton in Texas and the unexplained surge in Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'.
Turning to non-fiction, "The GMO Deception" by Sheldon Krimsky offers a comprehensive analysis of the controversies surrounding GMOs, delving into the scientific, ethical, and political dimensions of this contentious issue. Similarly, "Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth" by Avi Loeb explores the tantalizing prospect of extraterrestrial life, providing a thought-provoking backdrop for our investigation.
On the other hand, in the realm of fiction, the works of Douglas Adams and Kurt Vonnegut often traverse the surreal and the absurd, mirroring the peculiarity of our research pursuits. While not directly related to GMOs or UFO sightings, the narratives of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" and "Slaughterhouse-Five" prompt contemplation on the unpredictable and the unforeseen, much like the unanticipated correlation we have uncovered.
Pushing the boundaries of conventional research, it is important to note that inspiration and insights can stem from unorthodox sources. In our quest for knowledge, we have taken an unconventional approach, drawing inspiration from unexpected quarters. In doing so, we have ventured into uncharted territory, embracing unconventional methodologies reminiscent of a UFO navigating through unexplored celestial domains. This eclectic approach has led us to consider the unlikeliest of sources, including the backs of shampoo bottles, fostering a panoramic perspective in our pursuit of knowledge.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' over the 18-year period from 2004 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9115307 and the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8308883 indicate a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, with a p-value of less than 0.01.
The scatterplot presented in Figure 1 displays the unmistakable trend, resembling a constellation of data points that align as if following the trajectory of a flying saucer. The plot illustrates the compelling association between the adoption of GMO cotton and the increased public interest in reporting UFO sightings, underscoring the intrigue and magnitude of this unexpected finding.
These results lend credence to the notion that there may exist an underlying connection, whether it be the captivating allure of extraterrestrial encounters amidst the vast Texan cotton fields or the possibility of otherworldly forces influencing the internet search behavior of the populace. While we cannot conclusively establish causation, the findings spark further contemplation regarding the complex interplay between agricultural practices, popular culture, and the unexplored realms of the cosmos.
In the midst of the empirical rigor and statistical scrutiny, it is important to acknowledge the whimsicality of this discovery, akin to stumbling upon an unidentified crop circle in the midst of a scientific expedition. The juxtaposition of agricultural innovation and interstellar fascination presents a narrative fit for an otherworldly tale, reminding us that in the tapestry of scientific inquiry, the most peculiar correlations can emerge, much like a cosmic conundrum awaiting decipherment.
The unfolding enigma prompts us to transcend conventional research boundaries and prompts us to gaze into the unfathomable depths of the universe, fostering a sense of wonder that encapsulates the essence of scientific inquiry. The correlation between GMO cotton and searches for UFO sightings serves as a testament to the unpredictability of empirical exploration, reminding us that in the grand theater of knowledge, reality can sometimes emulate the plot of a science fiction novel, with twists and turns that defy conventional understanding.
In the wake of these intriguing revelations, it is imperative to approach with an open mind, welcoming the unexpected as a harbinger of new insights and untold mysteries waiting to be unraveled. The results not only challenge conventional wisdom but also beckon us to embrace the enigmatic, much like a bewildering encounter with the unknown in the vast expanse of the cosmos.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have illuminated a rather intriguing relationship between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. This unexpected correlation encourages a reevaluation of our understanding of societal interactions and prompts contemplation on the unanticipated links that may underlie seemingly disparate phenomena. While the connection between GMO cotton and UFO sightings may appear whimsical at first glance, our results support and extend prior research in surprising ways.

The findings of our study resonate with the work of Smith and Doe (2005), who underscored the far-reaching impact of GMOs on agricultural practices. Our results further emphasize the broader societal implications of GMO adoption, hinting at the possibility of a cosmic dimension influencing public interests. Additionally, the remarkable correlation aligns with Jones et al.'s (2010) exploration of public perceptions and attitudes towards genetically modified crops, suggesting that the influence of GMOs may extend beyond traditional agricultural and environmental domains, penetrating into the realm of popular culture and unexplained phenomena.

Notably, our study draws inspiration from unconventional sources such as science fiction literature, mirroring the broader trend of expanding scholarly perspectives to incorporate diverse influences. The narratives of writers like Douglas Adams and Kurt Vonnegut, though seemingly unrelated to our research, offer a unique lens through which to consider the unexpected connections that pervade our findings. Moreover, the unorthodox nature of our inquiry, reflected in the literature review, reflects the essence of scientific exploration that transcends conventional boundaries, echoing the spirit of adventure akin to a UFO navigating uncharted territories.

The robust statistical correlation we have uncovered underscores the need for an open-minded approach to scientific inquiry, embracing the whimsical and the unforeseen as catalysts for new insights. The scatterplot resembling a constellation humorously aligns with the indescribable allure of the unknown, echoing the enigmatic nature of our findings. The peculiarity of this correlation, akin to a crop circle in a scientific expedition, reminds us of the unexpected delights that empirical exploration can yield, much like stumbling upon a hidden treasure amidst the daunting terrain of knowledge.

In conclusion, the results of our study not only reaffirm the influence of GMO adoption on societal dynamics but also beckon us to embrace the unanticipated connections that pepper the scientific landscape. The correlation between GMO cotton and searches for UFO sightings serves as a testament to the whimsicality inherent in empirical inquiry, urging us to approach research with a sense of wonder and curiosity, ever-mindful of the cryptic riddles awaiting decipherment in the vast expanse of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton in Texas: A Link to Google Searches for 'Report UFO Sighting'?"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research, we explored the potential link between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' over a span of 18 years. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our study yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9115307 and p < 0.01, suggesting a significant association between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unexpected correlation has raised intriguing questions, prompting us to delve into the pop culture implications and societal factors that may underlie this peculiar relationship. While we cannot conclusively assert causation, the results certainly provide food for thought and serve as a reminder that even in the world of empirical research, truth can often be stranger than fiction.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As we delve into the mysterious realm of agricultural biotechnology and internet search trends, it has become undeniable that the world of research is as vast and enigmatic as the cosmos itself. The peculiar affinity between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in the expansive fields of Texas and the surge in Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' has left us dumbfounded, akin to an alien-induced cattle mutilation in the dead of night.
The seemingly disparate nature of these two phenomena raises eyebrows to the point where they might as well be receiving alien modifications. Yet, our pursuit of understanding and the innate human desire to connect seemingly unrelated dots have led us down this curious rabbit hole, armed with statistical analyses and an insatiable curiosity as potent as a rogue crop duster spraying a field.
In this paper, we embark on a multidisciplinary exploration, aiming to unlock the peculiar relationship between the adoption of GMO cotton in the Lone Star State and the cyberspace allure of extraterrestrial encounters. Our quest is not only to unravel the statistical significance but to delve into the societal fabric that may bind these disparate, yet oddly intertwined phenomena, much like a UFO tractor beam enveloping its unsuspecting targets.
Through this journey, we hope to uncover the tantalizing enigma that lies at the intersection of agricultural innovation and celestial curiosity, paying tribute to the timeless maxim that in the labyrinthine corridors of science, truth often wears the guise of the unexpected, much like an alien donning a human suit.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' over the 18-year period from 2004 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9115307 and the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8308883 indicate a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, with a p-value of less than 0.01.
The scatterplot presented in Figure 1 displays the unmistakable trend, resembling a constellation of data points that align as if following the trajectory of a flying saucer. The plot illustrates the compelling association between the adoption of GMO cotton and the increased public interest in reporting UFO sightings, underscoring the intrigue and magnitude of this unexpected finding.
These results lend credence to the notion that there may exist an underlying connection, whether it be the captivating allure of extraterrestrial encounters amidst the vast Texan cotton fields or the possibility of otherworldly forces influencing the internet search behavior of the populace. While we cannot conclusively establish causation, the findings spark further contemplation regarding the complex interplay between agricultural practices, popular culture, and the unexplored realms of the cosmos.
In the midst of the empirical rigor and statistical scrutiny, it is important to acknowledge the whimsicality of this discovery, akin to stumbling upon an unidentified crop circle in the midst of a scientific expedition. The juxtaposition of agricultural innovation and interstellar fascination presents a narrative fit for an otherworldly tale, reminding us that in the tapestry of scientific inquiry, the most peculiar correlations can emerge, much like a cosmic conundrum awaiting decipherment.
The unfolding enigma prompts us to transcend conventional research boundaries and prompts us to gaze into the unfathomable depths of the universe, fostering a sense of wonder that encapsulates the essence of scientific inquiry. The correlation between GMO cotton and searches for UFO sightings serves as a testament to the unpredictability of empirical exploration, reminding us that in the grand theater of knowledge, reality can sometimes emulate the plot of a science fiction novel, with twists and turns that defy conventional understanding.
In the wake of these intriguing revelations, it is imperative to approach with an open mind, welcoming the unexpected as a harbinger of new insights and untold mysteries waiting to be unraveled. The results not only challenge conventional wisdom but also beckon us to embrace the enigmatic, much like a bewildering encounter with the unknown in the vast expanse of the cosmos.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of our study lead us to grapple with a conundrum as perplexing as an alien language deciphered by a linguistics aficionado. The robust correlation between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in Texas and the surge in Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' unfurls a narrative akin to a cosmic comedy, where the threads of agricultural innovation and extraterrestrial intrigue intertwine with an unexpected flourish. While we cannot establish a definitive causal link, the statistical evidence serves as a potent reminder that in the labyrinth of empirical inquiry, truth often arrives on a spaceship of unpredictability.

The ramifications of this discovery extend far beyond the confines of statistical analysis, beckoning us to ponder the whimsical dance of societal phenomena and technological advancements. Like a NASA scientist pondering the prospect of life beyond Earth, we are left contemplating the uncanny intersection of GMO cotton adoption and the cybernetic quest for interstellar encounters, transcending the boundaries of traditional research landscapes and venturing into the uncharted territory of the cosmic unknown.

With an air of whimsy that resonates like the laughter of a cosmic jester, we acknowledge the sheer serendipity of this unexpected correlation, inviting further exploration that sparks the imagination and kindles the flames of curiosity, much like a meteor shower illuminating the night sky. Thus, we assert with a wry smile and a dash of playful irony that no further research is needed in this area, for the enigma of GMO cotton and UFO sightings has left its indelible mark on the tapestry of empirical inquiry, embodying the notion that truth is often stranger than fiction, and perhaps, a touch more extraterrestrial in nature.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Genetically Modified Cotton in Texas: A Link to Google Searches for 'Report UFO Sighting'?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Extraterrestrial Botany and Behavioral Psychology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Genetically Modified Cotton in Texas: A Link to Google Searches for 'Report UFO Sighting'?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Agronomical Studies and Extraterrestrial Inquiry


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Genetically Modified Cotton in Texas: A Link to Google Searches for 'Report UFO Sighting'? with an abstract of In this research, we explored the potential link between the adoption of genetically modified cotton (GMO) in the state of Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' over a span of 18 years. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our study yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9115307 and p < 0.01, suggesting a significant association between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unexpected correlation has raised intriguing questions, prompting us to delve into the pop culture implications and societal factors that may underlie this peculiar relationship. While we cannot conclusively assert causation, the results certainly provide food for thought and serve as a reminder that even in the world of empirical research, truth can often be stranger than fiction.

ChatGPT:

genetically modified cotton, GMO cotton, Texas agriculture, UFO sightings, correlation study, Google search trends, pop culture implications, societal factors, empirical research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Texas
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Texas that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Texas

Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'

Correlation r = 0.9115307 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8308883 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'report UFO sighting') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Texas) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.7E-8. 0.0000000569497683948080550000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 5.7E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 17,559,334 random variables You don't actually need 17 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.78, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in Texas (GMO cotton %)4035343631312719221715111113107877
Google searches for 'report UFO sighting' (Rel. search volume)18.666712.416713.259.833339.1666710.416711.83338.166676.55.416673.916675.333333.52.833333.583334.4166744.53.16667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([40,35,34,36,31,31,27,19,22,17,15,11,11,13,10,7,8,7,7,])
array_2 = np.array([18.6667,12.4167,13.25,9.83333,9.16667,10.4167,11.8333,8.16667,6.5,5.41667,3.91667,5.33333,3.5,2.83333,3.58333,4.41667,4,4.5,3.16667,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Texas"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'report UFO sighting'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 2419 · Black Variable ID: 788 · Red Variable ID: 1392
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0