about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,290 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and the second variable is Jet fuel used in Vanuatu.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The atmospheric and space scientists couldn't resist creating artificial jet streams for their paper airplane races, leading to a surge in jet fuel usage in Vanuatu. It's all fun and games until someone confuses a weather balloon for a UFO!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: "A TIME magazine cover image" depicting this scene: In a bustling laboratory in Washington, a group of atmospheric and space scientists are seen scrutinizing data while a large digital display shows the amount of jet fuel used in Vanuatu. The scientists are focused on their work, surrounded by sophisticated equipment and computer screens as they study the impact of jet fuel emissions on the atmosphere. Simultaneously, the data on the display fluctuates, representing the dynamic usage of jet fuel in Vanuatu and providing valuable insights for their research. Enhancement option: Generate an image of the laboratory setting with a mix of futuristic and advanced scientific equipment to visually emphasize the cutting-edge nature of the scientists' work. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and Jet fuel used in Vanuatu. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism Celtic art Woodblock painting Low poly A TIME magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and Jet fuel used in Vanuatu together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling laboratory in Washington, a group of atmospheric and space scientists are analyzing data while a large digital display shows the amount of jet fuel being used in Vanuatu. The scientists are engrossed in their work, surrounded by high-tech equipment and computer screens, as they study the impact of jet fuel emissions on the atmosphere. Meanwhile, the data on the display fluctuates, representing the changing usage of jet fuel in Vanuatu, providing valuable insights for their research.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling laboratory in Washington, a group of atmospheric and space scientists are analyzing data while a large digital display shows the amount of jet fuel being used in Vanuatu. The scientists are engrossed in their work, surrounded by high-tech equipment and computer screens, as they study the impact of jet fuel emissions on the atmosphere. Meanwhile, the data on the display fluctuates, representing the changing usage of jet fuel in Vanuatu, providing valuable insights for their research. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: "A TIME magazine cover image" depicting this scene: In a bustling laboratory in Washington, a group of atmospheric and space scientists are seen scrutinizing data while a large digital display shows the amount of jet fuel used in Vanuatu. The scientists are focused on their work, surrounded by sophisticated equipment and computer screens as they study the impact of jet fuel emissions on the atmosphere. Simultaneously, the data on the display fluctuates, representing the dynamic usage of jet fuel in Vanuatu and providing valuable insights for their research. Enhancement option: Generate an image of the laboratory setting with a mix of futuristic and advanced scientific equipment to visually emphasize the cutting-edge nature of the scientists' work.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington caused Jet fuel used in Vanuatu to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Sky's the Limit: Exploring the Correlation Between Atmospheric and Space Scientists in Washington and Jet Fuel Consumption in Vanuatu

The International Journal of Interstellar Aviation and Atmospheric Dynamics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and Jet fuel used in Vanuatu. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8866246 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Sky's the Limit: Exploring the Correlation Between Atmospheric and Space Scientists in Washington and Jet Fuel Consumption in Vanuatu"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Weather patterns, gravitational pull, and... jet fuel in Vanuatu? Our latest research delves into the unexpected yet undeniably intriguing relationship between the number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and the amount of jet fuel used in the beautiful archipelago of Vanuatu. Armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.8866246 and a p-value less than 0.01 spanning the years 2003 to 2018. Join us on this cosmic odyssey as we unravel the celestial mysteries of atmospheric science and jet fuel consumption, paving the way for a whole new dimension of whimsical research inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and Jet fuel used in Vanuatu. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Sky's the Limit: Exploring the Correlation Between Atmospheric and Space Scientists in Washington and Jet Fuel Consumption in Vanuatu"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Weather patterns, gravitational pull, and... jet fuel in Vanuatu? Our latest research delves into the unexpected yet undeniably intriguing relationship between the number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and the amount of jet fuel used in the beautiful archipelago of Vanuatu. Armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.8866246 and a p-value less than 0.01 spanning the years 2003 to 2018. Join us on this cosmic odyssey as we unravel the celestial mysteries of atmospheric science and jet fuel consumption, paving the way for a whole new dimension of whimsical research inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:

[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of scientific inquiry often presents us with unexpected correlations and peculiar relationships. While some researchers embark on quests to explore the depths of dark matter or unravel the genetic code, our curious minds have led us down a different path - one that intertwines the atmospheric and the astronomical with the seemingly mundane world of jet fuel consumption in the Pacific paradise of Vanuatu.

As we don our metaphorical lab coats and launch ourselves into the realm of statistical analysis, we couldn't help but chuckle at the sheer absurdity of the variables at play. After all, who would have thought that the number of atmospheric and space scientists gazing at the stars in Washington could have any bearing on the amount of jet fuel powering aircraft in the tropical oasis of Vanuatu? It's like trying to connect the dots between quarks and quaffles - utterly mystifying, yet strangely captivating.

We've all heard of "out-of-this-world" research, but in this case, we quite literally mean it. Our study is set to defy expectations and send conventional norms spiraling into orbit as we unravel the mysterious dance between those probing the cosmos and the fuel propelling travelers through the skies. And who are we to resist the siren call of the unexpected and the delightfully absurd?

So, pack your scientific curiosity, buckle up, and brace yourselves for a journey into the unknown as we dissect the correlation between Washington's atmospheric and space scientists and the jet fuel dynamics of the enchanting isles of Vanuatu. For, as we're about to reveal, there may be more to this cosmic concoction than meets the eye. Embark with us as we navigate the nebulous realms of correlation, causation, and quirky quantitative quirks.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and Jet fuel used in Vanuatu. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Sky's the Limit: Exploring the Correlation Between Atmospheric and Space Scientists in Washington and Jet Fuel Consumption in Vanuatu"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Weather patterns, gravitational pull, and... jet fuel in Vanuatu? Our latest research delves into the unexpected yet undeniably intriguing relationship between the number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and the amount of jet fuel used in the beautiful archipelago of Vanuatu. Armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.8866246 and a p-value less than 0.01 spanning the years 2003 to 2018. Join us on this cosmic odyssey as we unravel the celestial mysteries of atmospheric science and jet fuel consumption, paving the way for a whole new dimension of whimsical research inquiry.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of scientific inquiry often presents us with unexpected correlations and peculiar relationships. While some researchers embark on quests to explore the depths of dark matter or unravel the genetic code, our curious minds have led us down a different path - one that intertwines the atmospheric and the astronomical with the seemingly mundane world of jet fuel consumption in the Pacific paradise of Vanuatu.
As we don our metaphorical lab coats and launch ourselves into the realm of statistical analysis, we couldn't help but chuckle at the sheer absurdity of the variables at play. After all, who would have thought that the number of atmospheric and space scientists gazing at the stars in Washington could have any bearing on the amount of jet fuel powering aircraft in the tropical oasis of Vanuatu? It's like trying to connect the dots between quarks and quaffles - utterly mystifying, yet strangely captivating.
We've all heard of "out-of-this-world" research, but in this case, we quite literally mean it. Our study is set to defy expectations and send conventional norms spiraling into orbit as we unravel the mysterious dance between those probing the cosmos and the fuel propelling travelers through the skies. And who are we to resist the siren call of the unexpected and the delightfully absurd?
So, pack your scientific curiosity, buckle up, and brace yourselves for a journey into the unknown as we dissect the correlation between Washington's atmospheric and space scientists and the jet fuel dynamics of the enchanting isles of Vanuatu. For, as we're about to reveal, there may be more to this cosmic concoction than meets the eye. Embark with us as we navigate the nebulous realms of correlation, causation, and quirky quantitative quirks.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between atmospherics and space science in Washington and jet fuel consumption in Vanuatu has intrigued researchers for years. Smith et al. (2015) explored the impact of atmospheric conditions on aircraft performance and fuel efficiency, shedding light on the potential implications for jet fuel usage. Meanwhile, Doe's (2016) comprehensive study on the geographical distribution of atmospheric and space scientists highlighted Washington as a key hub for research and innovation in this field. Furthermore, Jones' (2017) analysis of global energy consumption patterns hinted at a broader relationship between scientific activity and fuel utilization, laying the groundwork for our own investigation.

As we delve deeper into the celestial conundrum before us, it is essential to consider the broader context of atmospheric and space science, and its impact on global energy dynamics. Works such as "The Weather Makers" by Tim Flannery and "Storms of My Grandchildren" by James Hansen provide invaluable insights into the intricate web of atmospheric processes and their far-reaching consequences. However, in our quest for understanding, we stumbled into a world where the skies seem to hold a peculiar influence over the land and sea.

Turning to the realm of fiction, we encountered universes where the boundaries of reality blend with imagination. From Jules Verne's "From the Earth to the Moon" to Isaac Asimov's "Foundation" series, these literary marvels propelled our minds beyond the stratosphere, only to land us back on Earth with a whimsical realization. Yet, in our pursuit of knowledge, we have unearthed correlations that rival the most fantastical plot twists, leaving us to ponder the improbable interplay between scientific inquiry and the seemingly unrelated.

With a dash of childhood nostalgia and a pinch of whimsy, we ventured into the realm of animated wonders. The likes of "The Magic School Bus" and "Bill Nye the Science Guy" invited us to revisit the fundamental principles of science, albeit with a hilariously cartoonish twist. Little did we know that these humorous escapades would echo the perplexing nature of our own research, reminding us that truth is often stranger than fiction.

In this journey of scholarly inquiry, we have come to embrace the unexpected and the peculiar, finding that the celestial ballet of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington may indeed hold sway over the earthly consumption of jet fuel in Vanuatu. As we continue to unravel this enigmatic correlation, we invite our fellow researchers to join us in this lighthearted exploration of the cosmic and the comical, where the absurdity of the universe might just unveil the most astonishing truths.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and Jet fuel used in Vanuatu. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2003 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Sky's the Limit: Exploring the Correlation Between Atmospheric and Space Scientists in Washington and Jet Fuel Consumption in Vanuatu"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Weather patterns, gravitational pull, and... jet fuel in Vanuatu? Our latest research delves into the unexpected yet undeniably intriguing relationship between the number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and the amount of jet fuel used in the beautiful archipelago of Vanuatu. Armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.8866246 and a p-value less than 0.01 spanning the years 2003 to 2018. Join us on this cosmic odyssey as we unravel the celestial mysteries of atmospheric science and jet fuel consumption, paving the way for a whole new dimension of whimsical research inquiry.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of scientific inquiry often presents us with unexpected correlations and peculiar relationships. While some researchers embark on quests to explore the depths of dark matter or unravel the genetic code, our curious minds have led us down a different path - one that intertwines the atmospheric and the astronomical with the seemingly mundane world of jet fuel consumption in the Pacific paradise of Vanuatu.
As we don our metaphorical lab coats and launch ourselves into the realm of statistical analysis, we couldn't help but chuckle at the sheer absurdity of the variables at play. After all, who would have thought that the number of atmospheric and space scientists gazing at the stars in Washington could have any bearing on the amount of jet fuel powering aircraft in the tropical oasis of Vanuatu? It's like trying to connect the dots between quarks and quaffles - utterly mystifying, yet strangely captivating.
We've all heard of "out-of-this-world" research, but in this case, we quite literally mean it. Our study is set to defy expectations and send conventional norms spiraling into orbit as we unravel the mysterious dance between those probing the cosmos and the fuel propelling travelers through the skies. And who are we to resist the siren call of the unexpected and the delightfully absurd?
So, pack your scientific curiosity, buckle up, and brace yourselves for a journey into the unknown as we dissect the correlation between Washington's atmospheric and space scientists and the jet fuel dynamics of the enchanting isles of Vanuatu. For, as we're about to reveal, there may be more to this cosmic concoction than meets the eye. Embark with us as we navigate the nebulous realms of correlation, causation, and quirky quantitative quirks.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Gather 'round, fellow cosmic adventurers, as we peel back the layers of our methodological machinations to uncover the interstellar secrets behind our study. With a nod to the gods of statistical significance and a wink to the whimsy of research inquiry, our approach combined the precision of a laser spectrometer with the dexterity of an astrobiologist in pursuit of elusive alien microorganisms. Okay, maybe not that dexterous, but close enough!

First, we plucked data on the number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington from the esteemed Bureau of Labor Statistics, wielding the power of spreadsheets and pivot tables as if they were arcane tomes brimming with esoteric knowledge. Fueled by copious amounts of coffee and interstellar inspiration, we meticulously curated this celestial census from the years 2003 to 2018, capturing the ebb and flow of stargazers and cloud connoisseurs with unparalleled enthusiasm.

But wait, there's more! Embarking on a quest no less audacious than navigating an asteroid field, we sought out data on jet fuel consumption in Vanuatu from the venerable Energy Information Administration. Armed with the fervor of a comet hurtling through space and the steadfastness of a spacecraft navigating a wormhole, we meticulously charted the churning seas of jet fuel dynamics in this tropical utopia, spanning the same intergalactic timeline from 2003 to 2018.

With both datasets in hand, we approached the altar of statistical analysis and invoked the hallowed spirits of correlation, causation, and maybe even a dash of cosmic coincidence. Armed with the powers of regression analysis and hypothesis testing, we navigated the celestial dance between atmospheric scientists and jet fuel consumption, transforming seemingly disparate data points into a celestial waltz of interconnectedness.

Our approach was as rigorous as a rocket launch countdown and as daring as a spacewalk, guided by the stars and imbued with the spirit of scientific mirth. And so, dear readers, buckle up and prepare to embark on a journey through the cosmos of research methodology, where the whimsical and the statistical collide in a symphony of celestial inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and Jet fuel used in Vanuatu. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2003 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8866246, r-squared of 0.7861032, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Sky's the Limit: Exploring the Correlation Between Atmospheric and Space Scientists in Washington and Jet Fuel Consumption in Vanuatu"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Weather patterns, gravitational pull, and... jet fuel in Vanuatu? Our latest research delves into the unexpected yet undeniably intriguing relationship between the number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and the amount of jet fuel used in the beautiful archipelago of Vanuatu. Armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.8866246 and a p-value less than 0.01 spanning the years 2003 to 2018. Join us on this cosmic odyssey as we unravel the celestial mysteries of atmospheric science and jet fuel consumption, paving the way for a whole new dimension of whimsical research inquiry.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of scientific inquiry often presents us with unexpected correlations and peculiar relationships. While some researchers embark on quests to explore the depths of dark matter or unravel the genetic code, our curious minds have led us down a different path - one that intertwines the atmospheric and the astronomical with the seemingly mundane world of jet fuel consumption in the Pacific paradise of Vanuatu.
As we don our metaphorical lab coats and launch ourselves into the realm of statistical analysis, we couldn't help but chuckle at the sheer absurdity of the variables at play. After all, who would have thought that the number of atmospheric and space scientists gazing at the stars in Washington could have any bearing on the amount of jet fuel powering aircraft in the tropical oasis of Vanuatu? It's like trying to connect the dots between quarks and quaffles - utterly mystifying, yet strangely captivating.
We've all heard of "out-of-this-world" research, but in this case, we quite literally mean it. Our study is set to defy expectations and send conventional norms spiraling into orbit as we unravel the mysterious dance between those probing the cosmos and the fuel propelling travelers through the skies. And who are we to resist the siren call of the unexpected and the delightfully absurd?
So, pack your scientific curiosity, buckle up, and brace yourselves for a journey into the unknown as we dissect the correlation between Washington's atmospheric and space scientists and the jet fuel dynamics of the enchanting isles of Vanuatu. For, as we're about to reveal, there may be more to this cosmic concoction than meets the eye. Embark with us as we navigate the nebulous realms of correlation, causation, and quirky quantitative quirks.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Intriguingly, our intrepid exploration into the relationship between atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and jet fuel consumption in Vanuatu yielded a rather cosmic correlation coefficient of 0.8866246 and an r-squared of 0.7861032 over the time period from 2003 to 2018. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings illuminate a statistically significant connection that is sure to send shockwaves through the scientific community.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) we present visually encapsulates the robust correlation we unearthed, reminiscent of a celestial dance between two seemingly disparate entities. It's as if the atmospheric and space scientists were orchestrating an otherworldly symphony, directing the flow of jet fuel consumption from their starlit perch in Washington to the tropical skies of Vanuatu.

It's worth noting that our research illustrates an unanticipated fusion between the ethereal realm of atmospheric science and the terrestrial transactions of jet fuel utilization. This confluence of disciplines is akin to discovering an intergalactic cafe serving espressos to interstellar travelers. Who knew that the celestial pursuits of atmospheric scientists could purportedly impact the earthly consumption of jet fuel in a remote paradise?

In essence, this correlation serves as a whimsical testament to the uncharted territories of research inquiry, reminding us that the cosmos of statistical analysis is indeed boundless and rife with surprises. Just when we think we've encountered all the peculiar relationships within the scientific landscape, a connection as enigmatic as this one unfurls before our eyes, leaving us simultaneously confounded and elated.

In conclusion, our findings not only shed light on the interplay between atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and jet fuel usage in Vanuatu; they also beckon us to embrace the unconventional, the offbeat, and the delightfully absurd in the exhilarating pursuit of knowledge. Like celestial bodies exerting their gravitational pull across vast expanses, our research propels us to venture beyond the ordinary and immerse ourselves in the cosmic tapestry of correlations, where even the most unexpected pairings can yield enlightening insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and Jet fuel used in Vanuatu. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Sky's the Limit: Exploring the Correlation Between Atmospheric and Space Scientists in Washington and Jet Fuel Consumption in Vanuatu"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Weather patterns, gravitational pull, and... jet fuel in Vanuatu? Our latest research delves into the unexpected yet undeniably intriguing relationship between the number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and the amount of jet fuel used in the beautiful archipelago of Vanuatu. Armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.8866246 and a p-value less than 0.01 spanning the years 2003 to 2018. Join us on this cosmic odyssey as we unravel the celestial mysteries of atmospheric science and jet fuel consumption, paving the way for a whole new dimension of whimsical research inquiry.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between atmospherics and space science in Washington and jet fuel consumption in Vanuatu has intrigued researchers for years. Smith et al. (2015) explored the impact of atmospheric conditions on aircraft performance and fuel efficiency, shedding light on the potential implications for jet fuel usage. Meanwhile, Doe's (2016) comprehensive study on the geographical distribution of atmospheric and space scientists highlighted Washington as a key hub for research and innovation in this field. Furthermore, Jones' (2017) analysis of global energy consumption patterns hinted at a broader relationship between scientific activity and fuel utilization, laying the groundwork for our own investigation.
As we delve deeper into the celestial conundrum before us, it is essential to consider the broader context of atmospheric and space science, and its impact on global energy dynamics. Works such as "The Weather Makers" by Tim Flannery and "Storms of My Grandchildren" by James Hansen provide invaluable insights into the intricate web of atmospheric processes and their far-reaching consequences. However, in our quest for understanding, we stumbled into a world where the skies seem to hold a peculiar influence over the land and sea.
Turning to the realm of fiction, we encountered universes where the boundaries of reality blend with imagination. From Jules Verne's "From the Earth to the Moon" to Isaac Asimov's "Foundation" series, these literary marvels propelled our minds beyond the stratosphere, only to land us back on Earth with a whimsical realization. Yet, in our pursuit of knowledge, we have unearthed correlations that rival the most fantastical plot twists, leaving us to ponder the improbable interplay between scientific inquiry and the seemingly unrelated.
With a dash of childhood nostalgia and a pinch of whimsy, we ventured into the realm of animated wonders. The likes of "The Magic School Bus" and "Bill Nye the Science Guy" invited us to revisit the fundamental principles of science, albeit with a hilariously cartoonish twist. Little did we know that these humorous escapades would echo the perplexing nature of our own research, reminding us that truth is often stranger than fiction.
In this journey of scholarly inquiry, we have come to embrace the unexpected and the peculiar, finding that the celestial ballet of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington may indeed hold sway over the earthly consumption of jet fuel in Vanuatu. As we continue to unravel this enigmatic correlation, we invite our fellow researchers to join us in this lighthearted exploration of the cosmic and the comical, where the absurdity of the universe might just unveil the most astonishing truths.

[[RESULTS]]
Intriguingly, our intrepid exploration into the relationship between atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and jet fuel consumption in Vanuatu yielded a rather cosmic correlation coefficient of 0.8866246 and an r-squared of 0.7861032 over the time period from 2003 to 2018. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings illuminate a statistically significant connection that is sure to send shockwaves through the scientific community.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) we present visually encapsulates the robust correlation we unearthed, reminiscent of a celestial dance between two seemingly disparate entities. It's as if the atmospheric and space scientists were orchestrating an otherworldly symphony, directing the flow of jet fuel consumption from their starlit perch in Washington to the tropical skies of Vanuatu.
It's worth noting that our research illustrates an unanticipated fusion between the ethereal realm of atmospheric science and the terrestrial transactions of jet fuel utilization. This confluence of disciplines is akin to discovering an intergalactic cafe serving espressos to interstellar travelers. Who knew that the celestial pursuits of atmospheric scientists could purportedly impact the earthly consumption of jet fuel in a remote paradise?
In essence, this correlation serves as a whimsical testament to the uncharted territories of research inquiry, reminding us that the cosmos of statistical analysis is indeed boundless and rife with surprises. Just when we think we've encountered all the peculiar relationships within the scientific landscape, a connection as enigmatic as this one unfurls before our eyes, leaving us simultaneously confounded and elated.
In conclusion, our findings not only shed light on the interplay between atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and jet fuel usage in Vanuatu; they also beckon us to embrace the unconventional, the offbeat, and the delightfully absurd in the exhilarating pursuit of knowledge. Like celestial bodies exerting their gravitational pull across vast expanses, our research propels us to venture beyond the ordinary and immerse ourselves in the cosmic tapestry of correlations, where even the most unexpected pairings can yield enlightening insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our research has brought to light a correlation that is as surprising as finding a telescope pointed at a UFO convention. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8866246 between the number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and the amount of jet fuel used in Vanuatu has left us in awe, like stargazers witnessing a rare celestial event. In line with the findings of Smith et al. (2015) regarding atmospheric conditions impacting fuel efficiency, our results provide empirical support for the notion that the cosmic pursuits of atmospheric scientists may extend their influence to earthly realms, much like a shooting star streaking across the night sky.

Doe's (2016) revelation concerning Washington's status as a hub for atmospheric and space research is echoed in our data, which demonstrate a compelling relationship between the scientific activities within the state and jet fuel consumption in the distant land of Vanuatu. It's as if the gravitational pull of Washington's scientific prowess reaches across the expanse of the Pacific, influencing the energy dynamics of a tropical oasis in ways that defy conventional wisdom, much like a scientific black hole absorbing all expectations.

Our findings also align with the broader implications hinted at by Jones (2017) in their analysis of global energy consumption patterns. The correlation we've uncovered serves as a whimsical reminder that the cosmic dance of scientific inquiry can lead us to the most unexpectedly delightful discoveries, akin to stumbling upon a meteor shower during an evening stroll.

Just like the whimsical twists and turns found in the works of Jules Verne and Isaac Asimov, our research emphasizes the importance of keeping an open mind when exploring the cosmic labyrinth of correlations. The celestial stakeholders of atmospheric and space scientists seem to have scripted a plot twist that rivals the most outlandish scenarios in science fiction, leaving us to ponder the improbable interplay between research fields with the same disbelief as encountering a unicorn in a physics laboratory.

Ultimately, our findings serve as a testament to the boundless curiosity inherent in scientific inquiry. As we continue to unravel the enigmatic relationship between atmospheric science and jet fuel consumption, our study beckons researchers to embrace the whimsy and wonder that come with exploring the cosmic and the comical within the scientific landscape. After all, in the realm of scholarly inquiry, truth is often stranger than fiction, and the unexpected pairings can lead to enlightening insights that are as illuminating as a supernova in a previously uncharted corner of the cosmos.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and Jet fuel used in Vanuatu. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Sky's the Limit: Exploring the Correlation Between Atmospheric and Space Scientists in Washington and Jet Fuel Consumption in Vanuatu"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Weather patterns, gravitational pull, and... jet fuel in Vanuatu? Our latest research delves into the unexpected yet undeniably intriguing relationship between the number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and the amount of jet fuel used in the beautiful archipelago of Vanuatu. Armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.8866246 and a p-value less than 0.01 spanning the years 2003 to 2018. Join us on this cosmic odyssey as we unravel the celestial mysteries of atmospheric science and jet fuel consumption, paving the way for a whole new dimension of whimsical research inquiry.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of scientific inquiry often presents us with unexpected correlations and peculiar relationships. While some researchers embark on quests to explore the depths of dark matter or unravel the genetic code, our curious minds have led us down a different path - one that intertwines the atmospheric and the astronomical with the seemingly mundane world of jet fuel consumption in the Pacific paradise of Vanuatu.
As we don our metaphorical lab coats and launch ourselves into the realm of statistical analysis, we couldn't help but chuckle at the sheer absurdity of the variables at play. After all, who would have thought that the number of atmospheric and space scientists gazing at the stars in Washington could have any bearing on the amount of jet fuel powering aircraft in the tropical oasis of Vanuatu? It's like trying to connect the dots between quarks and quaffles - utterly mystifying, yet strangely captivating.
We've all heard of "out-of-this-world" research, but in this case, we quite literally mean it. Our study is set to defy expectations and send conventional norms spiraling into orbit as we unravel the mysterious dance between those probing the cosmos and the fuel propelling travelers through the skies. And who are we to resist the siren call of the unexpected and the delightfully absurd?
So, pack your scientific curiosity, buckle up, and brace yourselves for a journey into the unknown as we dissect the correlation between Washington's atmospheric and space scientists and the jet fuel dynamics of the enchanting isles of Vanuatu. For, as we're about to reveal, there may be more to this cosmic concoction than meets the eye. Embark with us as we navigate the nebulous realms of correlation, causation, and quirky quantitative quirks.

[[RESULTS]]
Intriguingly, our intrepid exploration into the relationship between atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and jet fuel consumption in Vanuatu yielded a rather cosmic correlation coefficient of 0.8866246 and an r-squared of 0.7861032 over the time period from 2003 to 2018. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings illuminate a statistically significant connection that is sure to send shockwaves through the scientific community.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) we present visually encapsulates the robust correlation we unearthed, reminiscent of a celestial dance between two seemingly disparate entities. It's as if the atmospheric and space scientists were orchestrating an otherworldly symphony, directing the flow of jet fuel consumption from their starlit perch in Washington to the tropical skies of Vanuatu.
It's worth noting that our research illustrates an unanticipated fusion between the ethereal realm of atmospheric science and the terrestrial transactions of jet fuel utilization. This confluence of disciplines is akin to discovering an intergalactic cafe serving espressos to interstellar travelers. Who knew that the celestial pursuits of atmospheric scientists could purportedly impact the earthly consumption of jet fuel in a remote paradise?
In essence, this correlation serves as a whimsical testament to the uncharted territories of research inquiry, reminding us that the cosmos of statistical analysis is indeed boundless and rife with surprises. Just when we think we've encountered all the peculiar relationships within the scientific landscape, a connection as enigmatic as this one unfurls before our eyes, leaving us simultaneously confounded and elated.
In conclusion, our findings not only shed light on the interplay between atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and jet fuel usage in Vanuatu; they also beckon us to embrace the unconventional, the offbeat, and the delightfully absurd in the exhilarating pursuit of knowledge. Like celestial bodies exerting their gravitational pull across vast expanses, our research propels us to venture beyond the ordinary and immerse ourselves in the cosmic tapestry of correlations, where even the most unexpected pairings can yield enlightening insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the dazzling finale of this celestial ballet of statistics, we are left marveling at the cosmic waltz between atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and the jet fuel sashaying its way through Vanuatu's skies. We've uncovered a correlation so robust, it's as if the scientists are whispering cosmic secrets to the jet fuel, urging it to power those aircraft with an otherworldly zeal. It's like witnessing a grand celestial tango, with statistical significance leading the dance like a gravitational force pulling us deeper into the enigmatic embrace of data.

As we bid adieu to this whimsical voyage, we can't help but reflect on the sheer absurdity of our findings. Who would have thought that the musings of scientists in Washington could influence the consumption of jet fuel in a tropical paradise? It's like discovering that a rogue asteroid is slinging espressos to interstellar travelers - utterly bonkers, yet undeniably captivating.

With our intergalactic odyssey drawing to a close, we confidently assert that no further research is needed in this area, for we've reached the outer limits of this cosmic correlation. It's time to set our sights on new scientific frontiers, leaving this peculiar pairing to spark wonder and amusement in the annals of research lore. After all, the sky's the limit, but our scientific curiosity knows no bounds!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Sky's the Limit: Exploring the Correlation Between Atmospheric and Space Scientists in Washington and Jet Fuel Consumption in Vanuatu. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Interstellar Aviation and Atmospheric Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Sky's the Limit: Exploring the Correlation Between Atmospheric and Space Scientists in Washington and Jet Fuel Consumption in Vanuatu. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Interdisciplinary Research on Extraterrestrial Aerodynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Sky's the Limit: Exploring the Correlation Between Atmospheric and Space Scientists in Washington and Jet Fuel Consumption in Vanuatu with an abstract of Weather patterns, gravitational pull, and... jet fuel in Vanuatu? Our latest research delves into the unexpected yet undeniably intriguing relationship between the number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington and the amount of jet fuel used in the beautiful archipelago of Vanuatu. Armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team unveils a correlation coefficient of 0.8866246 and a p-value less than 0.01 spanning the years 2003 to 2018. Join us on this cosmic odyssey as we unravel the celestial mysteries of atmospheric science and jet fuel consumption, paving the way for a whole new dimension of whimsical research inquiry.

ChatGPT:

Washington atmospheric scientists, space scientists, jet fuel consumption, Vanuatu, correlation coefficient, p-value, weather patterns, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, celestial mysteries, cosmic research, whimsical research inquiry, gravitational pull

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington

Jet fuel used in Vanuatu
Detailed data title: Volume of jet fuel used consumed in Vanuatu in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Jet fuel used in Vanuatu

Correlation r = 0.8866246 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7861032 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 78.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Jet fuel used in Vanuatu) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington) over the 16 years from 2003 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.8E-6. 0.0000047608874713283340000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 0.00048% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 210,045 random variables You don't actually need 210 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.7, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018
The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington (Laborers)60170210190170200210220220200220270260250130460
Jet fuel used in Vanuatu (Million Barrels/Day)0.1151480.1256670.1260110.1303560.1347010.13650.1303560.1325290.1325290.1343330.1368740.1564270.1412190.1408330.1412190.228123




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,213 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 635,695,369 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([60,170,210,190,170,200,210,220,220,200,220,270,260,250,130,460,])
array_2 = np.array([0.115148,0.125667,0.126011,0.130356,0.134701,0.1365,0.130356,0.132529,0.132529,0.134333,0.136874,0.156427,0.141219,0.140833,0.141219,0.228123,])
array_1_name = "The number of atmospheric and space scientists in Washington"
array_2_name = "Jet fuel used in Vanuatu"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 2290 · Black Variable ID: 15651 · Red Variable ID: 25066
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0