about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,265 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of private detectives in Ohio and the second variable is Google searches for 'tetanus'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The increase in private detectives in Ohio led to more surveillance of rusty old barns and abandoned buildings, inadvertently exposing people to the bacteria that cause tetanus. You could say the case of tetanus took a sharp turn for the worse as these sleuths rustled up more trouble than they anticipated!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generating an image with the style of "A scene from Skyrim," create a scene of a group of private detectives gathered in a dimly lit Ohio office. The detectives are engaged in discussion, surrounded by case files and evidence. One detective is depicted using a computer to search "tetanus" on Google, while the others are seen poring over case files, jotting down notes, and sharing findings. The room should exude an atmosphere of intensity and focus, enhanced by the use of dim lighting and detailed expressions on the detectives' faces. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of private detectives in Ohio and Google searches for 'tetanus'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Oragami A scene from Skyrim Surrealism An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Realistic
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of private detectives in Ohio and Google searches for 'tetanus' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Ohio, a group of private detectives is gathered in a room, discussing their investigations. One of them is using a computer to search "tetanus" on Google, while the others are looking at case files and taking notes.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In Ohio, a group of private detectives is gathered in a room, discussing their investigations. One of them is using a computer to search "tetanus" on Google, while the others are looking at case files and taking notes. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generating an image with the style of "A scene from Skyrim," create a scene of a group of private detectives gathered in a dimly lit Ohio office. The detectives are engaged in discussion, surrounded by case files and evidence. One detective is depicted using a computer to search "tetanus" on Google, while the others are seen poring over case files, jotting down notes, and sharing findings. The room should exude an atmosphere of intensity and focus, enhanced by the use of dim lighting and detailed expressions on the detectives' faces.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of private detectives in Ohio caused tetanus (Google searches for 'tetanus') to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Googling for Trouble: Exploring the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Ohio and Google Searches for 'Tetanus'

The Journal of Eccentric Research Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Ohio and Google searches for 'tetanus'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6961679 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Googling for Trouble: Exploring the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Ohio and Google Searches for 'Tetanus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves into the curious connection between the number of private detectives in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for 'tetanus'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6961679 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. This unexpected correlation sparks intriguing questions about the underlying factors at play, potentially unearthing a web of mysteries and intrigues worthy of investigation. Our findings not only shed light on this unconventional association but also offer a lighthearted twist to the idea that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Ohio and Google searches for 'tetanus'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Googling for Trouble: Exploring the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Ohio and Google Searches for 'Tetanus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves into the curious connection between the number of private detectives in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for 'tetanus'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6961679 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. This unexpected correlation sparks intriguing questions about the underlying factors at play, potentially unearthing a web of mysteries and intrigues worthy of investigation. Our findings not only shed light on this unconventional association but also offer a lighthearted twist to the idea that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Detectives and diseases, Google and gumshoes - it's a combination that seems more fitting for a quirky detective novel than a serious academic study. Yet here we are, delving into the curious connection between the number of private detectives in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for 'tetanus'. It's a bizarre pairing, but as they say, truth is often stranger than fiction.

In a world where data rules and correlations are king, we stumbled upon an unexpected statistical relationship that piqued our curiosity. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we embarked on a detective-like quest of our own, sifting through the numbers and unraveling the digital breadcrumbs.

The findings left us scratching our heads and grinning in equal measure. As unlikely as it may seem, we uncovered a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6961679 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. You might say it was a statistical 'Eureka!' moment, though perhaps with less dramatic fanfare.

This discovery not only raises eyebrows but also tickles the imagination. What could possibly link the cloak-and-dagger world of private detectives with the concern for tetanus, a disease largely associated with rusty nails and fondly remembered childhood immunizations?

As we embark on this academic adventure, we invite you to join us in exploring the delightful absurdity of this unlikely association. Our findings not only shed light on this unconventional correlation but also offer a lighthearted twist to the notion that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. So, buckle up and get ready to unravel this whimsical mystery with us. It's bound to be an investigation filled with unexpected twists and turns, and hopefully, a healthy dose of laughter along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Ohio and Google searches for 'tetanus'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Googling for Trouble: Exploring the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Ohio and Google Searches for 'Tetanus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves into the curious connection between the number of private detectives in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for 'tetanus'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6961679 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. This unexpected correlation sparks intriguing questions about the underlying factors at play, potentially unearthing a web of mysteries and intrigues worthy of investigation. Our findings not only shed light on this unconventional association but also offer a lighthearted twist to the idea that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Detectives and diseases, Google and gumshoes - it's a combination that seems more fitting for a quirky detective novel than a serious academic study. Yet here we are, delving into the curious connection between the number of private detectives in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for 'tetanus'. It's a bizarre pairing, but as they say, truth is often stranger than fiction.
In a world where data rules and correlations are king, we stumbled upon an unexpected statistical relationship that piqued our curiosity. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we embarked on a detective-like quest of our own, sifting through the numbers and unraveling the digital breadcrumbs.
The findings left us scratching our heads and grinning in equal measure. As unlikely as it may seem, we uncovered a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6961679 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. You might say it was a statistical 'Eureka!' moment, though perhaps with less dramatic fanfare.
This discovery not only raises eyebrows but also tickles the imagination. What could possibly link the cloak-and-dagger world of private detectives with the concern for tetanus, a disease largely associated with rusty nails and fondly remembered childhood immunizations?
As we embark on this academic adventure, we invite you to join us in exploring the delightful absurdity of this unlikely association. Our findings not only shed light on this unconventional correlation but also offer a lighthearted twist to the notion that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. So, buckle up and get ready to unravel this whimsical mystery with us. It's bound to be an investigation filled with unexpected twists and turns, and hopefully, a healthy dose of laughter along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the number of private detectives in Ohio has steadily increased over the past decade, reflecting a growing demand for investigative services. This rise is attributed to various factors such as increased litigation, corporate espionage, and the heightened concern for personal security in an age of internet scams and identity theft. The gumshoe industry, it seems, is alive and kicking, ready to tackle the enigmatic cases that come its way.

Moving into more unconventional territory, "Doe and Smithson" explore the patterns of Google searches related to health concerns. Among the myriad of searches, 'tetanus' emerges as a noteworthy subject, often peaking during times of natural disasters or public health scares. The authors delve into the psychology behind these queries, revealing a mix of genuine health apprehension and perhaps a touch of hypochondriasis. After all, who among us hasn't indulged in a late-night Google diagnosis only to conclude that a mild headache is indicative of a rare tropical disease?

As we delve deeper into the literature, we encounter "Jones and Thompson," who provide insight into the nebulous world of strange correlations. From the surprising link between ice cream sales and shark attacks to the eyebrow-raising association between the length of a person's name and their likelihood of succeeding in life, the authors take us on a whimsical journey through the land of statistical curiosities. It seems that the stranger the correlation, the more bemused our fascination becomes.

Now, steering off the beaten path, we venture into the world of non-fiction for some light-hearted yet oddly relevant reads. "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" by Mark Haddon, "The Secret History" by Donna Tartt, and "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" by Stieg Larsson catch our eye. These tales of mystery, intrigue, and unconventional investigations tickle our fancy and serve as a playful reminder that fact can be just as wacky as fiction.

And who could forget the timeless classics that transport us into the world of amateur and professional sleuths? "Sherlock Holmes" by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, "Nancy Drew" by Carolyn Keene, and "The Maltese Falcon" by Dashiell Hammett fuel our imagination with the allure of solving perplexing puzzles. Perhaps our own investigation into the association between private detectives and 'tetanus' searches will join the ranks of these illustrious tales, a modern-day caper with an unexpected twist.

Circling back to the present, we find ourselves drawn to the silver screen for some classic detective and medical-themed movies that offer a dash of entertainment and a sprinkle of relevancy. "The Pelican Brief," "Contagion," and "The Big Lebowski" provide a cinematic escape while nudging at the fringes of our topic. After all, a bit of levity is always welcome, even in the midst of academic scrutiny.

As we assimilate these diverse sources, we're reminded that truth, in its most peculiar forms, can be both engaging and downright hilarious. The confluence of private eyes and internet health searches may seem far-fetched, but as we navigate these eccentric waters, we're met with a realization - the world is an endlessly quirky place, and therein lies its charm.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Ohio and Google searches for 'tetanus'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Googling for Trouble: Exploring the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Ohio and Google Searches for 'Tetanus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves into the curious connection between the number of private detectives in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for 'tetanus'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6961679 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. This unexpected correlation sparks intriguing questions about the underlying factors at play, potentially unearthing a web of mysteries and intrigues worthy of investigation. Our findings not only shed light on this unconventional association but also offer a lighthearted twist to the idea that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Detectives and diseases, Google and gumshoes - it's a combination that seems more fitting for a quirky detective novel than a serious academic study. Yet here we are, delving into the curious connection between the number of private detectives in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for 'tetanus'. It's a bizarre pairing, but as they say, truth is often stranger than fiction.
In a world where data rules and correlations are king, we stumbled upon an unexpected statistical relationship that piqued our curiosity. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we embarked on a detective-like quest of our own, sifting through the numbers and unraveling the digital breadcrumbs.
The findings left us scratching our heads and grinning in equal measure. As unlikely as it may seem, we uncovered a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6961679 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. You might say it was a statistical 'Eureka!' moment, though perhaps with less dramatic fanfare.
This discovery not only raises eyebrows but also tickles the imagination. What could possibly link the cloak-and-dagger world of private detectives with the concern for tetanus, a disease largely associated with rusty nails and fondly remembered childhood immunizations?
As we embark on this academic adventure, we invite you to join us in exploring the delightful absurdity of this unlikely association. Our findings not only shed light on this unconventional correlation but also offer a lighthearted twist to the notion that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. So, buckle up and get ready to unravel this whimsical mystery with us. It's bound to be an investigation filled with unexpected twists and turns, and hopefully, a healthy dose of laughter along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic entanglement of private detectives and tetanus queries, our methodological approach was nothing short of a detective caper in itself. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) served as our trusty sidekick, providing comprehensive data on the employment of private detectives in the state of Ohio from 2004 to 2022. We combed through their reports with the fervor of a nosy neighbor peeking through their blinds, uncovering the ebbs and flows of the private investigating profession.

Meanwhile, our digital sleuthing led us to the beguiling realm of Google Trends, where we sleuthed our way through search query data pertaining to 'tetanus'. Like intrepid gumshoes hot on the trail, we meticulously charted the frequency and fluctuations of 'tetanus' searches to discern any peculiar patterns that paralleled the movements of Ohio's private detective numbers.

In a whimsical twist that even Agatha Christie would appreciate, we concocted a top-secret blend of statistical procedures to analyze the correlation between these seemingly incongruous entities. Embracing the spirit of adventure, we fervently employed Pearson's correlation coefficient to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship. Our trusty accomplice, the p-value, likewise played a pivotal role in determining the significance of our findings, standing guard against flimsy correlations like a steadfast guard dog.

As befitting the nature of our investigation, we cleverly observed potential confounding variables, such as societal trends, media influences, and the ever-elusive 'x' factor that often lurks in statistical studies like a mischievous specter. To ensure the rigor of our analysis, we wielded a veritable arsenal of statistical tools, including regression analysis, to ascertain the robustness of our findings and fend off any statistical red herrings.

Ultimately, our methodological concoction blended the precision of a scientist with the cunning of a detective, yielding a trove of data-driven revelations. The melding of labor statistics and search queries unveiled a correlation worthy of the most discerning sleuth. With both data sources in hand, we embarked on our intellectual escapade, determined to demystify this peculiar association and unveil the improbable narrative lurking within the hallowed halls of statistical significance.

In the end, our methodological escapade paid off, unearthed a significant correlation between the number of private detectives in Ohio and the prevalence of 'tetanus' searches, laying bare a surprising union that challenges the conventional boundaries of empirical investigation - and leaves us musing about the mysteries yet to be untangled.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Ohio and Google searches for 'tetanus'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6961679, r-squared of 0.4846497, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Googling for Trouble: Exploring the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Ohio and Google Searches for 'Tetanus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves into the curious connection between the number of private detectives in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for 'tetanus'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6961679 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. This unexpected correlation sparks intriguing questions about the underlying factors at play, potentially unearthing a web of mysteries and intrigues worthy of investigation. Our findings not only shed light on this unconventional association but also offer a lighthearted twist to the idea that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Detectives and diseases, Google and gumshoes - it's a combination that seems more fitting for a quirky detective novel than a serious academic study. Yet here we are, delving into the curious connection between the number of private detectives in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for 'tetanus'. It's a bizarre pairing, but as they say, truth is often stranger than fiction.
In a world where data rules and correlations are king, we stumbled upon an unexpected statistical relationship that piqued our curiosity. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we embarked on a detective-like quest of our own, sifting through the numbers and unraveling the digital breadcrumbs.
The findings left us scratching our heads and grinning in equal measure. As unlikely as it may seem, we uncovered a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6961679 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. You might say it was a statistical 'Eureka!' moment, though perhaps with less dramatic fanfare.
This discovery not only raises eyebrows but also tickles the imagination. What could possibly link the cloak-and-dagger world of private detectives with the concern for tetanus, a disease largely associated with rusty nails and fondly remembered childhood immunizations?
As we embark on this academic adventure, we invite you to join us in exploring the delightful absurdity of this unlikely association. Our findings not only shed light on this unconventional correlation but also offer a lighthearted twist to the notion that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. So, buckle up and get ready to unravel this whimsical mystery with us. It's bound to be an investigation filled with unexpected twists and turns, and hopefully, a healthy dose of laughter along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon analyzing the data, we were struck by the strength of the correlation between the number of private detectives in Ohio and Google searches for 'tetanus'. It seems that amidst the cloak-and-dagger world of private investigators, there lies an unexpected affinity for concerns about rusty nails and childhood immunizations. The correlation coefficient of 0.6961679 and an r-squared of 0.4846497 for the period from 2004 to 2022 startled us, to say the least. This statistical tête-à-tête between sleuths and lockjaw left us simultaneously bewildered and amused.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) provides a visual representation of this peculiar relationship, illustrating the substantial correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if Sherlock Holmes himself has left his deductive mark on the world of epidemiology with his uncanny ability to link mundane objects to unsolved mysteries.

Despite the initial incredulity, these unanticipated findings open a Pandora's box of questions. What hidden narratives lie beneath the surface of Ohio's private investigation sector? Are these gumshoes secretly moonlighting as health advocates, spreading awareness about the potential perils of rusty metal? Or could it be that lurking within the shadows of tetanus-related Internet inquiries are the footsteps of clandestine investigations?

It's clear that our research has unraveled a tangled web of unexpected connections, making us ponder the peculiar secrets that bind the clandestine world of private detectives with the sinister whispers of 'tetanus'. These findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also infuse a touch of humor into the often staid world of academic research. It's a delightful reminder that even in the realm of data analysis, unexpected correlations can unveil the wondrously weird and the charmingly absurd.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Ohio and Google searches for 'tetanus'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Googling for Trouble: Exploring the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Ohio and Google Searches for 'Tetanus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves into the curious connection between the number of private detectives in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for 'tetanus'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6961679 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. This unexpected correlation sparks intriguing questions about the underlying factors at play, potentially unearthing a web of mysteries and intrigues worthy of investigation. Our findings not only shed light on this unconventional association but also offer a lighthearted twist to the idea that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the number of private detectives in Ohio has steadily increased over the past decade, reflecting a growing demand for investigative services. This rise is attributed to various factors such as increased litigation, corporate espionage, and the heightened concern for personal security in an age of internet scams and identity theft. The gumshoe industry, it seems, is alive and kicking, ready to tackle the enigmatic cases that come its way.
Moving into more unconventional territory, "Doe and Smithson" explore the patterns of Google searches related to health concerns. Among the myriad of searches, 'tetanus' emerges as a noteworthy subject, often peaking during times of natural disasters or public health scares. The authors delve into the psychology behind these queries, revealing a mix of genuine health apprehension and perhaps a touch of hypochondriasis. After all, who among us hasn't indulged in a late-night Google diagnosis only to conclude that a mild headache is indicative of a rare tropical disease?
As we delve deeper into the literature, we encounter "Jones and Thompson," who provide insight into the nebulous world of strange correlations. From the surprising link between ice cream sales and shark attacks to the eyebrow-raising association between the length of a person's name and their likelihood of succeeding in life, the authors take us on a whimsical journey through the land of statistical curiosities. It seems that the stranger the correlation, the more bemused our fascination becomes.
Now, steering off the beaten path, we venture into the world of non-fiction for some light-hearted yet oddly relevant reads. "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" by Mark Haddon, "The Secret History" by Donna Tartt, and "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" by Stieg Larsson catch our eye. These tales of mystery, intrigue, and unconventional investigations tickle our fancy and serve as a playful reminder that fact can be just as wacky as fiction.
And who could forget the timeless classics that transport us into the world of amateur and professional sleuths? "Sherlock Holmes" by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, "Nancy Drew" by Carolyn Keene, and "The Maltese Falcon" by Dashiell Hammett fuel our imagination with the allure of solving perplexing puzzles. Perhaps our own investigation into the association between private detectives and 'tetanus' searches will join the ranks of these illustrious tales, a modern-day caper with an unexpected twist.
Circling back to the present, we find ourselves drawn to the silver screen for some classic detective and medical-themed movies that offer a dash of entertainment and a sprinkle of relevancy. "The Pelican Brief," "Contagion," and "The Big Lebowski" provide a cinematic escape while nudging at the fringes of our topic. After all, a bit of levity is always welcome, even in the midst of academic scrutiny.
As we assimilate these diverse sources, we're reminded that truth, in its most peculiar forms, can be both engaging and downright hilarious. The confluence of private eyes and internet health searches may seem far-fetched, but as we navigate these eccentric waters, we're met with a realization - the world is an endlessly quirky place, and therein lies its charm.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data, we were struck by the strength of the correlation between the number of private detectives in Ohio and Google searches for 'tetanus'. It seems that amidst the cloak-and-dagger world of private investigators, there lies an unexpected affinity for concerns about rusty nails and childhood immunizations. The correlation coefficient of 0.6961679 and an r-squared of 0.4846497 for the period from 2004 to 2022 startled us, to say the least. This statistical tête-à-tête between sleuths and lockjaw left us simultaneously bewildered and amused.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) provides a visual representation of this peculiar relationship, illustrating the substantial correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if Sherlock Holmes himself has left his deductive mark on the world of epidemiology with his uncanny ability to link mundane objects to unsolved mysteries.
Despite the initial incredulity, these unanticipated findings open a Pandora's box of questions. What hidden narratives lie beneath the surface of Ohio's private investigation sector? Are these gumshoes secretly moonlighting as health advocates, spreading awareness about the potential perils of rusty metal? Or could it be that lurking within the shadows of tetanus-related Internet inquiries are the footsteps of clandestine investigations?
It's clear that our research has unraveled a tangled web of unexpected connections, making us ponder the peculiar secrets that bind the clandestine world of private detectives with the sinister whispers of 'tetanus'. These findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also infuse a touch of humor into the often staid world of academic research. It's a delightful reminder that even in the realm of data analysis, unexpected correlations can unveil the wondrously weird and the charmingly absurd.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study not only confirm the previous research highlighting the steady rise of private detectives in Ohio but also add an unforeseen twist to the narrative. The significant correlation between the number of private detectives in Ohio and Google searches for 'tetanus' lends credence to the notion that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction, or rather, stranger than the mysteries that the private eyes aim to unravel.

Reflecting on the literature review, we find ourselves revisiting the curious correlations spotlighted by "Jones and Thompson" and the playful allusions to classic mystery novels such as "The Maltese Falcon" and "Sherlock Holmes." It's as if our data has stumbled upon a classic case straight out of a detective novel, where the protagonist uncovers a connection so peculiar that it seems comically improbable.

The unexpected linkage between private detectives and 'tetanus' searches not only adds a whimsical element to our exploration but also echoes the offbeat associations highlighted in the literature. It's almost as if we've stumbled upon a real-life portrayal of "The Girl with the Tetanus Inquiry."

The strength of the correlation coefficient and r-squared value further underscores the validity of this intriguing relationship, leaving us with a nod to the unpredictable nature of statistics and human behavior. The scatterplot, akin to a visual clue in a detective's case file, vividly illustrates the unexpected kinship between these divergent topics, urging us to contemplate the enigmatic forces at play behind this seemingly incongruous pairing.

In essence, our findings support the contention that seemingly unrelated variables can, in fact, intertwine in captivating ways, reminiscent of the intertwining plotlines of a tale spun by Agatha Christie. As we ponder the underlying narratives that bind private investigators with 'tetanus' queries, we are compelled to embrace the peculiar, the unexpected, and the delightfully absurd.

The results of this investigation encourage us to acknowledge the whimsy that can be uncovered in empirical research, reminding us that the world of statistical exploration is not devoid of surprises. These findings may more resemble the farcical goings-on in "The Big Lebowski" than the gravitas of a traditional research study. However, they serve as a reminder that even in the midst of academic inquiry, a touch of levity and unexpected correlations can ignite a sense of joy and wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of private detectives in Ohio and Google searches for 'tetanus'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Googling for Trouble: Exploring the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Ohio and Google Searches for 'Tetanus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our research delves into the curious connection between the number of private detectives in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for 'tetanus'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6961679 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. This unexpected correlation sparks intriguing questions about the underlying factors at play, potentially unearthing a web of mysteries and intrigues worthy of investigation. Our findings not only shed light on this unconventional association but also offer a lighthearted twist to the idea that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Detectives and diseases, Google and gumshoes - it's a combination that seems more fitting for a quirky detective novel than a serious academic study. Yet here we are, delving into the curious connection between the number of private detectives in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for 'tetanus'. It's a bizarre pairing, but as they say, truth is often stranger than fiction.
In a world where data rules and correlations are king, we stumbled upon an unexpected statistical relationship that piqued our curiosity. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we embarked on a detective-like quest of our own, sifting through the numbers and unraveling the digital breadcrumbs.
The findings left us scratching our heads and grinning in equal measure. As unlikely as it may seem, we uncovered a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6961679 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. You might say it was a statistical 'Eureka!' moment, though perhaps with less dramatic fanfare.
This discovery not only raises eyebrows but also tickles the imagination. What could possibly link the cloak-and-dagger world of private detectives with the concern for tetanus, a disease largely associated with rusty nails and fondly remembered childhood immunizations?
As we embark on this academic adventure, we invite you to join us in exploring the delightful absurdity of this unlikely association. Our findings not only shed light on this unconventional correlation but also offer a lighthearted twist to the notion that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction. So, buckle up and get ready to unravel this whimsical mystery with us. It's bound to be an investigation filled with unexpected twists and turns, and hopefully, a healthy dose of laughter along the way.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data, we were struck by the strength of the correlation between the number of private detectives in Ohio and Google searches for 'tetanus'. It seems that amidst the cloak-and-dagger world of private investigators, there lies an unexpected affinity for concerns about rusty nails and childhood immunizations. The correlation coefficient of 0.6961679 and an r-squared of 0.4846497 for the period from 2004 to 2022 startled us, to say the least. This statistical tête-à-tête between sleuths and lockjaw left us simultaneously bewildered and amused.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) provides a visual representation of this peculiar relationship, illustrating the substantial correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if Sherlock Holmes himself has left his deductive mark on the world of epidemiology with his uncanny ability to link mundane objects to unsolved mysteries.
Despite the initial incredulity, these unanticipated findings open a Pandora's box of questions. What hidden narratives lie beneath the surface of Ohio's private investigation sector? Are these gumshoes secretly moonlighting as health advocates, spreading awareness about the potential perils of rusty metal? Or could it be that lurking within the shadows of tetanus-related Internet inquiries are the footsteps of clandestine investigations?
It's clear that our research has unraveled a tangled web of unexpected connections, making us ponder the peculiar secrets that bind the clandestine world of private detectives with the sinister whispers of 'tetanus'. These findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also infuse a touch of humor into the often staid world of academic research. It's a delightful reminder that even in the realm of data analysis, unexpected correlations can unveil the wondrously weird and the charmingly absurd.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In concluding this whimsically unexpected romp through the correlation between private detectives in Ohio and Google searches for 'tetanus', we find ourselves both amused and bemused. The results of our investigation lead one to wonder if there is a clandestine network of trenchcoat-wearing sleuths spreading awareness about rusty nails and the perils of lockjaw, or if the shadowy depths of tetanus Internet inquiries conceal covert operations. Our findings not only challenge the boundaries of conventional wisdom but also infuse a much-needed dose of levity into the often-serious world of academic research.

While this research may have raised more questions than answers, we assert with confidence that no further academic inquiries are required in this baffling, comical, and oddly perplexing area of investigation. After all, a little mystery and absurdity make life all the more entertaining. As the great Sherlock Holmes might have said, "The game is afoot, but let's leave these peculiar correlations to rest." So, dear researchers, let us bid adieu to this oddball duo and turn our attention to less enigmatic endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Googling for Trouble: Exploring the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Ohio and Google Searches for 'Tetanus'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eccentric Research Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Googling for Trouble: Exploring the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Ohio and Google Searches for 'Tetanus'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Investigative and Anecdotal Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Googling for Trouble: Exploring the Relationship Between Private Detectives in Ohio and Google Searches for 'Tetanus' with an abstract of Our research delves into the curious connection between the number of private detectives in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for 'tetanus'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, we uncovered a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6961679 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2004 to 2022. This unexpected correlation sparks intriguing questions about the underlying factors at play, potentially unearthing a web of mysteries and intrigues worthy of investigation. Our findings not only shed light on this unconventional association but also offer a lighthearted twist to the idea that truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.

ChatGPT:

private detectives, Ohio, Google searches, tetanus, correlation coefficient, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Google Trends, investigation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of private detectives in Ohio
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of private detectives and investigators in Ohio
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of private detectives in Ohio

Google searches for 'tetanus'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'tetanus' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'tetanus'

Correlation r = 0.6961679 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4846497 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 48.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'tetanus') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of private detectives in Ohio) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00093. 0.0009304079581181473000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.7 in 0.093% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,075 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.35, 0.87 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of private detectives in Ohio (Laborers)124011009209709901270900680340127011401120830113012801510130016901570
Google searches for 'tetanus' (Rel. search volume)56.555.583349.548.583346.548.833348.083350.166756.557.083358.333361.166758.7563.7567.666776.916769.7578.583383.75




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1240,1100,920,970,990,1270,900,680,340,1270,1140,1120,830,1130,1280,1510,1300,1690,1570,])
array_2 = np.array([56.5,55.5833,49.5,48.5833,46.5,48.8333,48.0833,50.1667,56.5,57.0833,58.3333,61.1667,58.75,63.75,67.6667,76.9167,69.75,78.5833,83.75,])
array_1_name = "The number of private detectives in Ohio"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'tetanus'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 2265 · Black Variable ID: 12882 · Red Variable ID: 1398
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0