about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,236 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and the second variable is Lennar's stock price (LEN).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As household spending on furnishings and equipment went up, more people decided to "Lennar" their living spaces, leading to a surge in demand for new homes. This spike in demand boosted Lennar's stock price, proving that a well-decorated home is not only a mood lifter but also a stock lifter.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Whimsical illustration ] A charming living room with chic furniture and sleek appliances. The background hosts a happy family chatting and lounging in the comfort of their home. Overhead, a stock market graph displaying Lennar's soaring stock price creates an intriguing juxtaposition with the homely scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting Whimsical illustration 3D Pixar Style Cyber folk Vaporwave
ChatGPT: Whimsical illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: The scene is of a cozy living room with new, stylish furniture and modern appliances. In the background, a family is gathered, smiling, while they relax and chat. Above the room, a stock market graph is displayed, showing Lennar's stock price rising steadily.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Whimsical illustration ] and depicting this scene: The scene is of a cozy living room with new, stylish furniture and modern appliances. In the background, a family is gathered, smiling, while they relax and chat. Above the room, a stock market graph is displayed, showing Lennar's stock price rising steadily. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Whimsical illustration ] A charming living room with chic furniture and sleek appliances. The background hosts a happy family chatting and lounging in the comfort of their home. Overhead, a stock market graph displaying Lennar's soaring stock price creates an intriguing juxtaposition with the homely scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment caused Lennar's stock price (LEN) to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Chairs, Wares, and Lennar's Shares: Exploring the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Furnishings and Equipment and LEN Stock Price

The Journal of Financial Decorum

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price (LEN). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8227787 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Chairs, Wares, and Lennar's Shares: Exploring the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Furnishings and Equipment and LEN Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The perplexing correlation between US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price has been a subject of fervent discussion and speculation. In this study, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to disentangle this enigmatic association with statistical rigor. Our analysis, spanning the fruitful years from 2002 to 2022, yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8227787, with a p-value less than 0.01, arousing profound curiosity and raising eyebrows, akin to a recliner that springs a surprise reclining mechanism. Our findings, much like the assembling of flat-pack furniture, call for both caution and further investigation, intriguing economists and investors alike with their unexpected alignments.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price (LEN). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Chairs, Wares, and Lennar's Shares: Exploring the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Furnishings and Equipment and LEN Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The perplexing correlation between US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price has been a subject of fervent discussion and speculation. In this study, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to disentangle this enigmatic association with statistical rigor. Our analysis, spanning the fruitful years from 2002 to 2022, yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8227787, with a p-value less than 0.01, arousing profound curiosity and raising eyebrows, akin to a recliner that springs a surprise reclining mechanism. Our findings, much like the assembling of flat-pack furniture, call for both caution and further investigation, intriguing economists and investors alike with their unexpected alignments.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection between consumer spending habits and stock market performance has long been a point of fascination and contention within the field of economics. While some analysts focus on traditional economic indicators such as GDP growth and interest rates, others dive into the intriguing realm of consumer behavior, examining the correlations between household expenditures and the ever-fluctuating stock prices of companies.

In this study, we delved into the curious relationship between US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and the stock price of Lennar Corporation (LEN). Lennar, a prominent home construction and real estate company, might not be the first name that comes to mind when pondering consumer spending and stock prices, but as we will elucidate, it presents an intriguing case study in this enigmatic convergence of furniture and finance.

As with any scholarly pursuit, our endeavor was underpinned by an air of relentless seriousness, akin to an overzealous accountant meticulously balancing the books. However, we could not help but marvel at the irony that while households were busy furnishing their living spaces, the stock market seemed to be furnishing Lennar's shareholders with potential financial gains. Such peculiar connections often elicit a wry chuckle, reminiscent of a comedic misunderstanding during a game of financial charades.

The enduring allure of this investigation lies in its capacity to uncover unexpected patterns and connections, much like stumbling upon a hidden compartment in an antique armoire. Our aim was to present our findings with utmost scholarly gravity, all the while appreciating the whimsical dance of economic data and market movements, akin to a solemn ballet performance with occasional spontaneous bursts of exuberance.

As we proceed to unravel the tangled threads of household spending and stock prices, we invite our readers to join us in this scholarly journey, wherein we navigate the labyrinthine corridors of consumer behavior and financial markets, armed with statistical tests and a twinkle in the eye.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price (LEN). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Chairs, Wares, and Lennar's Shares: Exploring the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Furnishings and Equipment and LEN Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The perplexing correlation between US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price has been a subject of fervent discussion and speculation. In this study, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to disentangle this enigmatic association with statistical rigor. Our analysis, spanning the fruitful years from 2002 to 2022, yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8227787, with a p-value less than 0.01, arousing profound curiosity and raising eyebrows, akin to a recliner that springs a surprise reclining mechanism. Our findings, much like the assembling of flat-pack furniture, call for both caution and further investigation, intriguing economists and investors alike with their unexpected alignments.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection between consumer spending habits and stock market performance has long been a point of fascination and contention within the field of economics. While some analysts focus on traditional economic indicators such as GDP growth and interest rates, others dive into the intriguing realm of consumer behavior, examining the correlations between household expenditures and the ever-fluctuating stock prices of companies.
In this study, we delved into the curious relationship between US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and the stock price of Lennar Corporation (LEN). Lennar, a prominent home construction and real estate company, might not be the first name that comes to mind when pondering consumer spending and stock prices, but as we will elucidate, it presents an intriguing case study in this enigmatic convergence of furniture and finance.
As with any scholarly pursuit, our endeavor was underpinned by an air of relentless seriousness, akin to an overzealous accountant meticulously balancing the books. However, we could not help but marvel at the irony that while households were busy furnishing their living spaces, the stock market seemed to be furnishing Lennar's shareholders with potential financial gains. Such peculiar connections often elicit a wry chuckle, reminiscent of a comedic misunderstanding during a game of financial charades.
The enduring allure of this investigation lies in its capacity to uncover unexpected patterns and connections, much like stumbling upon a hidden compartment in an antique armoire. Our aim was to present our findings with utmost scholarly gravity, all the while appreciating the whimsical dance of economic data and market movements, akin to a solemn ballet performance with occasional spontaneous bursts of exuberance.
As we proceed to unravel the tangled threads of household spending and stock prices, we invite our readers to join us in this scholarly journey, wherein we navigate the labyrinthine corridors of consumer behavior and financial markets, armed with statistical tests and a twinkle in the eye.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Numerous studies have attempted to unravel the intricate web of connections between consumer spending behavior and stock market dynamics. Smith et al. (2015) posited that consumer spending on household furnishings and equipment could serve as a leading indicator for stock price movements, challenging the conventional wisdom surrounding economic indicators. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) found a significant correlation between household expenditure patterns and stock market performance, emphasizing the need for further exploration of these interrelated phenomena.

In "The Economics of Household Furnishings" by Brown and Green, the authors delve into the nuanced motivations underlying consumer purchasing decisions in the realm of household furnishings and equipment. Their comprehensive analysis encompasses factors such as lifestyle trends, design preferences, and the impact of technological advancements on consumer behavior. Furthermore, "The Financial Fitness Guide" by White explores the intricacies of personal finance management, shedding light on the broader implications of consumer spending habits on investment opportunities.

Turning to fictitious literature, the timeless classic "The Chair Whisperer" by Austen illuminates the subtle art of selecting the perfect seating arrangement, a narrative that subtly hints at the psychological influences driving consumer behavior in the household furnishings market. Similarly, "The Furnishing Fortune" by Dickens weaves a tale of financial gain and loss amidst the backdrop of opulent furnishings, offering a whimsical exploration of the intersection between material goods and monetary pursuits.

In our quest for a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between household spending and stock prices, we also drew insights from popular television programs. Watching "House Hunters" and "Property Brothers" provided an immersive experience in the realm of real estate and home improvement, offering a firsthand glimpse into the preferences and spending patterns of potential homeowners. Contrary to popular belief, the allure of a spacious kitchen island or a cozy reading nook may extend beyond mere functionality, potentially influencing investment decisions and stock price movements.

Suffice it to say, our research journey traversed a diverse landscape of scholarly discourse, literary imagination, and televised insights, capturing the multifaceted essence of household spending and its potential impact on stock prices. As we continue our expedition into the uncharted territories of economic analysis, we remain ever cognizant of the whimsical interplay between consumer behavior and financial markets, embracing both the gravity of empirical inquiry and the serendipitous humor inherent in the pursuit of economic understanding.

References:
Smith, A., Johnson, B., & Williams, C. (2015). Unveiling the Links Between Consumer Spending and Stock Price Movement. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(4), 115-132.

Doe, J., & Jones, S. (2018). Household Expenditure Patterns and Stock Market Performance: A Comprehensive Analysis. Economic Inquiry, 30(2), 245-263.

Brown, R., & Green, M. (2017). The Economics of Household Furnishings. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

White, E. (2019). The Financial Fitness Guide. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price (LEN). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Chairs, Wares, and Lennar's Shares: Exploring the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Furnishings and Equipment and LEN Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The perplexing correlation between US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price has been a subject of fervent discussion and speculation. In this study, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to disentangle this enigmatic association with statistical rigor. Our analysis, spanning the fruitful years from 2002 to 2022, yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8227787, with a p-value less than 0.01, arousing profound curiosity and raising eyebrows, akin to a recliner that springs a surprise reclining mechanism. Our findings, much like the assembling of flat-pack furniture, call for both caution and further investigation, intriguing economists and investors alike with their unexpected alignments.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection between consumer spending habits and stock market performance has long been a point of fascination and contention within the field of economics. While some analysts focus on traditional economic indicators such as GDP growth and interest rates, others dive into the intriguing realm of consumer behavior, examining the correlations between household expenditures and the ever-fluctuating stock prices of companies.
In this study, we delved into the curious relationship between US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and the stock price of Lennar Corporation (LEN). Lennar, a prominent home construction and real estate company, might not be the first name that comes to mind when pondering consumer spending and stock prices, but as we will elucidate, it presents an intriguing case study in this enigmatic convergence of furniture and finance.
As with any scholarly pursuit, our endeavor was underpinned by an air of relentless seriousness, akin to an overzealous accountant meticulously balancing the books. However, we could not help but marvel at the irony that while households were busy furnishing their living spaces, the stock market seemed to be furnishing Lennar's shareholders with potential financial gains. Such peculiar connections often elicit a wry chuckle, reminiscent of a comedic misunderstanding during a game of financial charades.
The enduring allure of this investigation lies in its capacity to uncover unexpected patterns and connections, much like stumbling upon a hidden compartment in an antique armoire. Our aim was to present our findings with utmost scholarly gravity, all the while appreciating the whimsical dance of economic data and market movements, akin to a solemn ballet performance with occasional spontaneous bursts of exuberance.
As we proceed to unravel the tangled threads of household spending and stock prices, we invite our readers to join us in this scholarly journey, wherein we navigate the labyrinthine corridors of consumer behavior and financial markets, armed with statistical tests and a twinkle in the eye.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To explore the perplexing relationship between US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price, our research team embarked on a rigorous and meticulous journey through the labyrinthine corridors of data analysis. Armed with an indefatigable commitment to statistical rigor and a predisposition for the occasional financial pun, we endeavored to elucidate this curious convergence of furniture and finance. Our methodology, while presenting a facade of scholarly solemnity, bore within it the spirit of an adventurous expedition into the uncharted territories of economic inquiry.

Data Collection:
The foundation of our study rested upon the extensive collection of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) – the two proverbial wellsprings of economic and financial insights. Our data harvesting process involved traversing the virtual landscape of the internet, sifting through a myriad of sources to assemble a comprehensive dataset spanning the fruitful years from 2002 to 2022. Much like dedicated gatherers during a harvest festival, we diligently amassed a bountiful assortment of expenditure figures and stock prices, mindful of the inherent quirks and caprices of data compilation.

Statistical Analysis:
Having amassed our economic cornucopia of data, we set about subjecting it to a battery of statistical analyses, akin to an alchemist carefully manipulating esoteric substances in search of hidden connections. Employing the venerable tools of correlation analysis and regression modeling, we sought to distill the essence of the relationship between household spending on furnishings and Lennar's stock price, all the while navigating the treacherous terrain of statistical assumptions and potential confounders. With steadfast determination and a pinch of statistical wizardry, we endeavored to unveil the coiled enigma that lay within our datasets, much like an intrepid explorer delving into the heart of an uncharted jungle.

Risk Management:
Of course, no academic odyssey would be complete without a vigilant eye toward risk management. As we charted the vicissitudes of household spending and stock price movements, we remained cognizant of the pitfalls of spurious correlations and the dangers of over-interpretation. Like prudent navigators sailing through the uncharted waters of statistical inference, we meticulously scrutinized our findings, guarding against the siren call of spurious causation and the mirage of statistical significance, ensuring that our conclusions stood firm against the tempestuous gusts of academic scrutiny.

In this manner, our methodology blended the staid rigor of academic inquiry with a tempered sense of scholarly adventure, much like a cautious explorer embarking on a quest for hidden treasures, all the while cognizant of the whims and caprices of economic data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price (LEN). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8227787, r-squared of 0.6769648, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Chairs, Wares, and Lennar's Shares: Exploring the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Furnishings and Equipment and LEN Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The perplexing correlation between US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price has been a subject of fervent discussion and speculation. In this study, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to disentangle this enigmatic association with statistical rigor. Our analysis, spanning the fruitful years from 2002 to 2022, yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8227787, with a p-value less than 0.01, arousing profound curiosity and raising eyebrows, akin to a recliner that springs a surprise reclining mechanism. Our findings, much like the assembling of flat-pack furniture, call for both caution and further investigation, intriguing economists and investors alike with their unexpected alignments.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection between consumer spending habits and stock market performance has long been a point of fascination and contention within the field of economics. While some analysts focus on traditional economic indicators such as GDP growth and interest rates, others dive into the intriguing realm of consumer behavior, examining the correlations between household expenditures and the ever-fluctuating stock prices of companies.
In this study, we delved into the curious relationship between US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and the stock price of Lennar Corporation (LEN). Lennar, a prominent home construction and real estate company, might not be the first name that comes to mind when pondering consumer spending and stock prices, but as we will elucidate, it presents an intriguing case study in this enigmatic convergence of furniture and finance.
As with any scholarly pursuit, our endeavor was underpinned by an air of relentless seriousness, akin to an overzealous accountant meticulously balancing the books. However, we could not help but marvel at the irony that while households were busy furnishing their living spaces, the stock market seemed to be furnishing Lennar's shareholders with potential financial gains. Such peculiar connections often elicit a wry chuckle, reminiscent of a comedic misunderstanding during a game of financial charades.
The enduring allure of this investigation lies in its capacity to uncover unexpected patterns and connections, much like stumbling upon a hidden compartment in an antique armoire. Our aim was to present our findings with utmost scholarly gravity, all the while appreciating the whimsical dance of economic data and market movements, akin to a solemn ballet performance with occasional spontaneous bursts of exuberance.
As we proceed to unravel the tangled threads of household spending and stock prices, we invite our readers to join us in this scholarly journey, wherein we navigate the labyrinthine corridors of consumer behavior and financial markets, armed with statistical tests and a twinkle in the eye.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation uncovered a notable correlation between annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price (LEN) over the period from 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.8227787 indicated a strong positive relationship between these two variables. To put it in layman's terms, it's as if the stock price of Lennar was as comfortably cushioned as a well-upholstered sofa, in sync with the fluctuations in household spending on furnishing and equipping their abodes.

The r-squared value of 0.6769648 suggested that approximately 68% of the variability in Lennar's stock price could be explained by changes in annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment. This finding, much like a seamlessly assembled piece of furniture, provided a robust foundation for understanding the influence of consumer behavior on stock market dynamics.

Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicated that the observed correlation was statistically significant, leading us to reject the null hypothesis with a confidence level higher than a well-polished mahogany dining table.

Upon visual examination of the data, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) revealed a strikingly clear pattern, akin to a pristine showroom where every piece of furniture found its intended place. The alignment of data points on the plot mirrored the alignment of a perfectly designed room, where each element complements the other, highlighting the unmistakable connection between US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price.

In essence, our results illuminate a captivating relationship between consumer spending on household goods and the stock performance of a leading real estate company, inviting further exploration and analysis. Much like a cleverly integrated bookshelf in a well-decorated room, this correlation prompts contemplation and infuses the realm of economics with an unexpected dash of domestic charm.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price (LEN). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Chairs, Wares, and Lennar's Shares: Exploring the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Furnishings and Equipment and LEN Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The perplexing correlation between US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price has been a subject of fervent discussion and speculation. In this study, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to disentangle this enigmatic association with statistical rigor. Our analysis, spanning the fruitful years from 2002 to 2022, yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8227787, with a p-value less than 0.01, arousing profound curiosity and raising eyebrows, akin to a recliner that springs a surprise reclining mechanism. Our findings, much like the assembling of flat-pack furniture, call for both caution and further investigation, intriguing economists and investors alike with their unexpected alignments.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous studies have attempted to unravel the intricate web of connections between consumer spending behavior and stock market dynamics. Smith et al. (2015) posited that consumer spending on household furnishings and equipment could serve as a leading indicator for stock price movements, challenging the conventional wisdom surrounding economic indicators. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) found a significant correlation between household expenditure patterns and stock market performance, emphasizing the need for further exploration of these interrelated phenomena.
In "The Economics of Household Furnishings" by Brown and Green, the authors delve into the nuanced motivations underlying consumer purchasing decisions in the realm of household furnishings and equipment. Their comprehensive analysis encompasses factors such as lifestyle trends, design preferences, and the impact of technological advancements on consumer behavior. Furthermore, "The Financial Fitness Guide" by White explores the intricacies of personal finance management, shedding light on the broader implications of consumer spending habits on investment opportunities.
Turning to fictitious literature, the timeless classic "The Chair Whisperer" by Austen illuminates the subtle art of selecting the perfect seating arrangement, a narrative that subtly hints at the psychological influences driving consumer behavior in the household furnishings market. Similarly, "The Furnishing Fortune" by Dickens weaves a tale of financial gain and loss amidst the backdrop of opulent furnishings, offering a whimsical exploration of the intersection between material goods and monetary pursuits.
In our quest for a more comprehensive understanding of the relationship between household spending and stock prices, we also drew insights from popular television programs. Watching "House Hunters" and "Property Brothers" provided an immersive experience in the realm of real estate and home improvement, offering a firsthand glimpse into the preferences and spending patterns of potential homeowners. Contrary to popular belief, the allure of a spacious kitchen island or a cozy reading nook may extend beyond mere functionality, potentially influencing investment decisions and stock price movements.
Suffice it to say, our research journey traversed a diverse landscape of scholarly discourse, literary imagination, and televised insights, capturing the multifaceted essence of household spending and its potential impact on stock prices. As we continue our expedition into the uncharted territories of economic analysis, we remain ever cognizant of the whimsical interplay between consumer behavior and financial markets, embracing both the gravity of empirical inquiry and the serendipitous humor inherent in the pursuit of economic understanding.
References:
Smith, A., Johnson, B., & Williams, C. (2015). Unveiling the Links Between Consumer Spending and Stock Price Movement. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(4), 115-132.
Doe, J., & Jones, S. (2018). Household Expenditure Patterns and Stock Market Performance: A Comprehensive Analysis. Economic Inquiry, 30(2), 245-263.
Brown, R., & Green, M. (2017). The Economics of Household Furnishings. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
White, E. (2019). The Financial Fitness Guide. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation uncovered a notable correlation between annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price (LEN) over the period from 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.8227787 indicated a strong positive relationship between these two variables. To put it in layman's terms, it's as if the stock price of Lennar was as comfortably cushioned as a well-upholstered sofa, in sync with the fluctuations in household spending on furnishing and equipping their abodes.
The r-squared value of 0.6769648 suggested that approximately 68% of the variability in Lennar's stock price could be explained by changes in annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment. This finding, much like a seamlessly assembled piece of furniture, provided a robust foundation for understanding the influence of consumer behavior on stock market dynamics.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicated that the observed correlation was statistically significant, leading us to reject the null hypothesis with a confidence level higher than a well-polished mahogany dining table.
Upon visual examination of the data, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) revealed a strikingly clear pattern, akin to a pristine showroom where every piece of furniture found its intended place. The alignment of data points on the plot mirrored the alignment of a perfectly designed room, where each element complements the other, highlighting the unmistakable connection between US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price.
In essence, our results illuminate a captivating relationship between consumer spending on household goods and the stock performance of a leading real estate company, inviting further exploration and analysis. Much like a cleverly integrated bookshelf in a well-decorated room, this correlation prompts contemplation and infuses the realm of economics with an unexpected dash of domestic charm.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study align with prior research highlighting the intriguing connection between consumer spending behavior and stock market dynamics. Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018) set the stage for our investigation by emphasizing the significance of household expenditure patterns as potential indicators of stock price movements. Our findings not only corroborate their assertions but also infuse a certain whimsical charm into the realm of economic analysis.

The strong positive correlation between annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price (LEN) lends weight to the notion that consumer behaviors in the realm of home furnishings may indeed resonate in the domain of financial markets. It appears that tracking the ebbs and flows of household spending on furnishings provides insights akin to discovering unexpected nooks and crannies in a well-furnished living space.

In line with the comprehensive analysis by Brown and Green (2017) on the economics of household furnishings, our study underscores the nuanced motivations underlying consumer purchasing decisions, albeit through the lens of stock price movements. The interplay between lifestyle trends, design preferences, and technological advancements in consumer behavior seems to extend its reach into the domain of investment opportunities, much like a well-placed statement piece capturing attention in a room.

While it may seem unorthodox to draw inspiration from fictitious literature and televised insights, our engagement with the timeless wisdom of "The Chair Whisperer" and "The Furnishing Fortune" imparts a touch of allegorical richness to our contemporary economic discourse. As Dickens' narrative weaves a tale of financial gain and loss amidst opulent furnishings, our findings reflect a narrative of statistical significance amidst the opulence of data analysis, subtly hinting at the potential repercussions of consumer sentiment on stock performance.

The visual alignment of data points in the scatterplot (Fig. 1) evokes the sense of a purposefully arranged interior, where each element harmonizes with the next, metaphorically mirroring the harmony between household spending on furnishings and Lennar's stock price. This unexpected connection underscores the enduring influence of intimate spaces on the broader canvas of financial markets, adding a whimsical touch to our empirical exploration.

In essence, our study contributes to the enchanting tapestry of economic understanding, where the allure of consumer behavior captivates investors and scholars alike. As we navigate the labyrinthine corridors of statistical inference, we remain ever attuned to the serendipitous charm suffusing the interplay between household spending and stock prices, inviting further research laced with both empirical rigor and an enduring appreciation for the delightful quirks of economic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price (LEN). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Chairs, Wares, and Lennar's Shares: Exploring the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Furnishings and Equipment and LEN Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The perplexing correlation between US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price has been a subject of fervent discussion and speculation. In this study, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to disentangle this enigmatic association with statistical rigor. Our analysis, spanning the fruitful years from 2002 to 2022, yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8227787, with a p-value less than 0.01, arousing profound curiosity and raising eyebrows, akin to a recliner that springs a surprise reclining mechanism. Our findings, much like the assembling of flat-pack furniture, call for both caution and further investigation, intriguing economists and investors alike with their unexpected alignments.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection between consumer spending habits and stock market performance has long been a point of fascination and contention within the field of economics. While some analysts focus on traditional economic indicators such as GDP growth and interest rates, others dive into the intriguing realm of consumer behavior, examining the correlations between household expenditures and the ever-fluctuating stock prices of companies.
In this study, we delved into the curious relationship between US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and the stock price of Lennar Corporation (LEN). Lennar, a prominent home construction and real estate company, might not be the first name that comes to mind when pondering consumer spending and stock prices, but as we will elucidate, it presents an intriguing case study in this enigmatic convergence of furniture and finance.
As with any scholarly pursuit, our endeavor was underpinned by an air of relentless seriousness, akin to an overzealous accountant meticulously balancing the books. However, we could not help but marvel at the irony that while households were busy furnishing their living spaces, the stock market seemed to be furnishing Lennar's shareholders with potential financial gains. Such peculiar connections often elicit a wry chuckle, reminiscent of a comedic misunderstanding during a game of financial charades.
The enduring allure of this investigation lies in its capacity to uncover unexpected patterns and connections, much like stumbling upon a hidden compartment in an antique armoire. Our aim was to present our findings with utmost scholarly gravity, all the while appreciating the whimsical dance of economic data and market movements, akin to a solemn ballet performance with occasional spontaneous bursts of exuberance.
As we proceed to unravel the tangled threads of household spending and stock prices, we invite our readers to join us in this scholarly journey, wherein we navigate the labyrinthine corridors of consumer behavior and financial markets, armed with statistical tests and a twinkle in the eye.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation uncovered a notable correlation between annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price (LEN) over the period from 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.8227787 indicated a strong positive relationship between these two variables. To put it in layman's terms, it's as if the stock price of Lennar was as comfortably cushioned as a well-upholstered sofa, in sync with the fluctuations in household spending on furnishing and equipping their abodes.
The r-squared value of 0.6769648 suggested that approximately 68% of the variability in Lennar's stock price could be explained by changes in annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment. This finding, much like a seamlessly assembled piece of furniture, provided a robust foundation for understanding the influence of consumer behavior on stock market dynamics.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicated that the observed correlation was statistically significant, leading us to reject the null hypothesis with a confidence level higher than a well-polished mahogany dining table.
Upon visual examination of the data, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) revealed a strikingly clear pattern, akin to a pristine showroom where every piece of furniture found its intended place. The alignment of data points on the plot mirrored the alignment of a perfectly designed room, where each element complements the other, highlighting the unmistakable connection between US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price.
In essence, our results illuminate a captivating relationship between consumer spending on household goods and the stock performance of a leading real estate company, inviting further exploration and analysis. Much like a cleverly integrated bookshelf in a well-decorated room, this correlation prompts contemplation and infuses the realm of economics with an unexpected dash of domestic charm.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unveiled a compelling correlation between annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price, akin to a perfectly coordinated room decor. The findings emphasize the intriguing interplay between consumer behavior and market dynamics, reminding us that even in the world of finance, there's no place like home.

Our research, while conducted with scholarly rigor, has brought to light the whimsical and often surprising connections that underpin economic phenomena. It's as if we've stumbled upon a previously unnoticed "open box" assembly of market trends and household expenditures, much like discovering an unexpected toolkit hidden inside a wardrobe.

The robust correlation coefficient, r-squared value, and statistically significant p-value speak to the genuine coherence between these seemingly disparate variables, akin to a harmonious symphony played out on an intricately crafted wooden instrument.

As we reflect on our findings, it becomes evident that further investigation into the intricate relationship between household spending and stock performance is akin to unearthing a treasure trove of insights, much like finding a long-lost heirloom hidden in the attic.

In light of these revelatory results, we assert that our study serves as a comprehensive exploration of the link between annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price. With its blend of meticulous analysis and subtle humor, we believe that our research leaves no cushion unturned in this investigation.

In the wisdom of the great economist, "May your finances be as sturdy as a well-constructed table, and your investments as timeless as a Chesterfield sofa." With this in mind, we declare that further research in this domain is as unnecessary as a redundant throw pillow.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Chairs, Wares, and Lennar's Shares: Exploring the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Furnishings and Equipment and LEN Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Financial Decorum


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Chairs, Wares, and Lennar's Shares: Exploring the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Furnishings and Equipment and LEN Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Economic Furnishings Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Chairs, Wares, and Lennar's Shares: Exploring the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Furnishings and Equipment and LEN Stock Price with an abstract of The perplexing correlation between US household spending on household furnishings and equipment and Lennar's stock price has been a subject of fervent discussion and speculation. In this study, employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to disentangle this enigmatic association with statistical rigor. Our analysis, spanning the fruitful years from 2002 to 2022, yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8227787, with a p-value less than 0.01, arousing profound curiosity and raising eyebrows, akin to a recliner that springs a surprise reclining mechanism. Our findings, much like the assembling of flat-pack furniture, call for both caution and further investigation, intriguing economists and investors alike with their unexpected alignments.

ChatGPT:

US household spending, household furnishings, household equipment, Lennar stock price, LEN stock price, correlation analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, statistical analysis, household spending trends, stock price correlation, consumer expenditures, furniture spending, economic impact, investment analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment
Detailed data title: Average annual household spend on household furnishings and equipment
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment

Lennar's stock price (LEN)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Lennar (LEN) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Lennar's stock price (LEN)

Correlation r = 0.8227787 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6769648 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Lennar's stock price (LEN)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.7E-6. 0.0000046777209897278640000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.00047% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 213,779 random variables You don't actually need 213 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.61, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment (Household spend)151814971646176717081797162415061467151415801542158118181829198720252098234627012606
Lennar's stock price (LEN) (Stock price)20.8722.8647.1855.7160.1550.6717.438.4512.5918.5719.7339.2738.4944.2247.3342.6663.9338.5656.0776.68115.84




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1518,1497,1646,1767,1708,1797,1624,1506,1467,1514,1580,1542,1581,1818,1829,1987,2025,2098,2346,2701,2606,])
array_2 = np.array([20.87,22.86,47.18,55.71,60.15,50.67,17.43,8.45,12.59,18.57,19.73,39.27,38.49,44.22,47.33,42.66,63.93,38.56,56.07,76.68,115.84,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on household furnishings and equipment"
array_2_name = "Lennar's stock price (LEN)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 2236 · Black Variable ID: 19916 · Red Variable ID: 1817
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0