about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,143 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Annual US household spending on home maintenance and the second variable is Netflix's stock price (NFLX).  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As household spending on home maintenance went up, people rediscovered the joys of sprucing up their living spaces. This led to a surge in home improvement enthusiasm, or as we can call it, a "DI-why not?" mentality. With their abodes looking more camera-ready, folks felt inspired to showcase their revamped living rooms and kitchen makeovers on social media. This created a domino effect, as others felt the urge to upgrade their own cribs, setting off a chain reaction of home renovations. As homes became the ultimate hotspots, the demand for quality entertainment soared. And who benefitted from this stay-at-home renovation renaissance? You guessed it – Netflix! With people wanting to kick back and admire their newly decorated dwellings, they turned to Netflix for some well-deserved relaxation and interior design inspo. It's like they say, a fresh coat of paint for your walls and a fresh lineup of shows on Netflix can really brighten up your day!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that captures the essence of a TIME magazine cover. The scene should feature a family relaxing in their modern living room, adorned with freshly painted walls and new shelves. The family is engrossed in watching Netflix, while a stock price ticker for the company scrolls across the bottom of the screen. The atmosphere should feel cozy and intimate, with warm lighting and a sense of togetherness. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on home maintenance and Netflix's stock price. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style 3D Pixar Style Cyber folk Oragami A TIME magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on home maintenance and Netflix's stock price together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A family sitting in their cozy living room, surrounded by freshly painted walls and newly installed shelves. They are watching their favorite shows on Netflix as the stock price ticker for the company scrolls across the bottom of the screen.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: A family sitting in their cozy living room, surrounded by freshly painted walls and newly installed shelves. They are watching their favorite shows on Netflix as the stock price ticker for the company scrolls across the bottom of the screen. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that captures the essence of a TIME magazine cover. The scene should feature a family relaxing in their modern living room, adorned with freshly painted walls and new shelves. The family is engrossed in watching Netflix, while a stock price ticker for the company scrolls across the bottom of the screen. The atmosphere should feel cozy and intimate, with warm lighting and a sense of togetherness.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Annual US household spending on home maintenance caused Netflix's stock price (NFLX) to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Streaming Subscriptions and Swaying Spending: Unveiling the Unlikely Association Between Annual US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and Netflix's Stock Price

The Journal of Random Interdisciplinary Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on home maintenance and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9738290 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Streaming Subscriptions and Swaying Spending: Unveiling the Unlikely Association Between Annual US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and Netflix's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the unexpected connection between household spending on home maintenance and the stock price of the prominent streaming service provider, Netflix (NFLX). Leveraging comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from 2003 to 2022, our study uncovers a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9738290 and a minuscule p-value of less than 0.01. These findings imply an intriguing relationship between the nitty-gritty of household upkeep and the flourishing fortunes of Netflix's stock. The results not only provide valuable insights for economists, but also offer a whimsical lens through which to contemplate the interplay between domestic diligence and digital entertainment. Our paper, in its witty and novel approach, challenges conventional economic wisdom and encourages a reevaluation of the seemingly mundane behaviors that may hold sway over the financial markets.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on home maintenance and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Streaming Subscriptions and Swaying Spending: Unveiling the Unlikely Association Between Annual US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and Netflix's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the unexpected connection between household spending on home maintenance and the stock price of the prominent streaming service provider, Netflix (NFLX). Leveraging comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from 2003 to 2022, our study uncovers a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9738290 and a minuscule p-value of less than 0.01. These findings imply an intriguing relationship between the nitty-gritty of household upkeep and the flourishing fortunes of Netflix's stock. The results not only provide valuable insights for economists, but also offer a whimsical lens through which to contemplate the interplay between domestic diligence and digital entertainment. Our paper, in its witty and novel approach, challenges conventional economic wisdom and encourages a reevaluation of the seemingly mundane behaviors that may hold sway over the financial markets.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

As the old adage goes, "a penny saved is a penny earned," but what if those pennies saved on home maintenance were actually driving up the stock prices of Netflix? In this study, we embark on a whimsical journey into the curious correlation between annual US household spending on home maintenance and the stock price of everyone's favorite binge-watching companion, Netflix (NFLX).

While the link between economic trends and the stock market is a well-trodden path, our research uncovers a connection that is as unexpected as finding a hidden subplot in a blockbuster movie. Leveraging a robust dataset from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) spanning nearly two decades, we unearth a statistically significant correlation that would make even the most seasoned financial analysts do a double-take.

As we delve into this peculiar pairing, our study aims to not only tickle the fancy of economists and investors but also to inject a sense of levity into the traditionally serious domain of financial research. Through our bold and unorthodox approach, we hope to inspire a renaissance of curiosity and open-mindedness in the exploration of seemingly unrelated phenomena and their impact on the stock market.

So, grab your toolkit and popcorn, because we are about to unravel the unlikely association between frugal fixer-uppers and soaring stock prices in the ever-entertaining world of economics and finance. Let the adventure begin!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on home maintenance and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Streaming Subscriptions and Swaying Spending: Unveiling the Unlikely Association Between Annual US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and Netflix's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the unexpected connection between household spending on home maintenance and the stock price of the prominent streaming service provider, Netflix (NFLX). Leveraging comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from 2003 to 2022, our study uncovers a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9738290 and a minuscule p-value of less than 0.01. These findings imply an intriguing relationship between the nitty-gritty of household upkeep and the flourishing fortunes of Netflix's stock. The results not only provide valuable insights for economists, but also offer a whimsical lens through which to contemplate the interplay between domestic diligence and digital entertainment. Our paper, in its witty and novel approach, challenges conventional economic wisdom and encourages a reevaluation of the seemingly mundane behaviors that may hold sway over the financial markets.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As the old adage goes, "a penny saved is a penny earned," but what if those pennies saved on home maintenance were actually driving up the stock prices of Netflix? In this study, we embark on a whimsical journey into the curious correlation between annual US household spending on home maintenance and the stock price of everyone's favorite binge-watching companion, Netflix (NFLX).
While the link between economic trends and the stock market is a well-trodden path, our research uncovers a connection that is as unexpected as finding a hidden subplot in a blockbuster movie. Leveraging a robust dataset from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) spanning nearly two decades, we unearth a statistically significant correlation that would make even the most seasoned financial analysts do a double-take.
As we delve into this peculiar pairing, our study aims to not only tickle the fancy of economists and investors but also to inject a sense of levity into the traditionally serious domain of financial research. Through our bold and unorthodox approach, we hope to inspire a renaissance of curiosity and open-mindedness in the exploration of seemingly unrelated phenomena and their impact on the stock market.
So, grab your toolkit and popcorn, because we are about to unravel the unlikely association between frugal fixer-uppers and soaring stock prices in the ever-entertaining world of economics and finance. Let the adventure begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The underpinning of our study hinges on unraveling the enigmatic relationship between annual US household spending on home maintenance and the stock price of Netflix (NFLX). The existing literature offers a plethora of insights into consumer spending behavior, stock market trends, and the interplay between seemingly unrelated variables. Smith et al. (2015) elucidate the impact of consumer sentiment on stock price movements, while Doe and Jones (2018) delve into the intricate dynamics of household expenditure. However, what these esteemed scholars may not have foreseen is the tantalizing correlation we are about to unearth between tightening a loose screw and Netflix’s stock soaring to new heights.

Turning our attention to non-fiction works that may shed light on our unconventional investigation, "Economics of Streaming Services" by Johnson (2019) and "Personal Finance Essentials" by Brown (2020) provide foundational knowledge on consumer spending habits and the economic forces at play in the entertainment industry. However, it is in the realm of fiction that we may find unexpected insights. "The Wealthy Gardener" by John Soforic and "The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck" by Mark Manson may hold the secret to a whimsical connection between household frugality and entertainment indulgence.

Venturing further afield, we encounter the unexpected and unconventional. In an unprecedented move, the authors took the liberty to conduct a thorough analysis of retailers' receipts, finding an intriguing pattern in the purchases of duct tape and popcorn correlating with fluctuations in Netflix's stock price. This unorthodox approach, while unconventional, has proven to illuminate a previously unnoticed relationship between hedging against leaky faucets and investing in a riveting movie night.

In summary, while the literature provides invaluable insights into consumer behavior, economic factors, and their impact on the stock market, it is the unassuming combination of household maintenance and digital entertainment that promises to add a touch of whimsy to the often austere world of economic analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on home maintenance and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Streaming Subscriptions and Swaying Spending: Unveiling the Unlikely Association Between Annual US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and Netflix's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the unexpected connection between household spending on home maintenance and the stock price of the prominent streaming service provider, Netflix (NFLX). Leveraging comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from 2003 to 2022, our study uncovers a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9738290 and a minuscule p-value of less than 0.01. These findings imply an intriguing relationship between the nitty-gritty of household upkeep and the flourishing fortunes of Netflix's stock. The results not only provide valuable insights for economists, but also offer a whimsical lens through which to contemplate the interplay between domestic diligence and digital entertainment. Our paper, in its witty and novel approach, challenges conventional economic wisdom and encourages a reevaluation of the seemingly mundane behaviors that may hold sway over the financial markets.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As the old adage goes, "a penny saved is a penny earned," but what if those pennies saved on home maintenance were actually driving up the stock prices of Netflix? In this study, we embark on a whimsical journey into the curious correlation between annual US household spending on home maintenance and the stock price of everyone's favorite binge-watching companion, Netflix (NFLX).
While the link between economic trends and the stock market is a well-trodden path, our research uncovers a connection that is as unexpected as finding a hidden subplot in a blockbuster movie. Leveraging a robust dataset from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) spanning nearly two decades, we unearth a statistically significant correlation that would make even the most seasoned financial analysts do a double-take.
As we delve into this peculiar pairing, our study aims to not only tickle the fancy of economists and investors but also to inject a sense of levity into the traditionally serious domain of financial research. Through our bold and unorthodox approach, we hope to inspire a renaissance of curiosity and open-mindedness in the exploration of seemingly unrelated phenomena and their impact on the stock market.
So, grab your toolkit and popcorn, because we are about to unravel the unlikely association between frugal fixer-uppers and soaring stock prices in the ever-entertaining world of economics and finance. Let the adventure begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
Our research team embarked on a rollicking quest across the vast expanse of the internet, armed with formidable search engine skills and a knack for uncovering hidden gems of data. We scoured the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) for the treasure trove of information pertaining to US household spending on home maintenance and the fluctuating stock price of Netflix (NFLX). Given the virtual smorgasbord of data sources available, we made sure to cast a wide net to capture the essence of this quirky relationship.

Time Frame:
To capture the grand tapestry of this interwoven saga, we collected data spanning the years from 2003 to 2022. This extensive time frame allowed us to witness the ebbs and flows of both household spending habits and the undulating stock price of Netflix, providing us with a rich canvas on which to paint our statistical masterpiece.

Data Cleaning and Processing:
Like intrepid explorers navigating through a jungle of numbers and figures, we meticulously cleaned and organized the collected data to ensure its purity and integrity. With deft hands and a discerning eye, we sifted through the data, separating the signal from the noise and discarding any outliers that might have muddied the waters of our analysis.

Statistical Analysis:
Our analysis took on the persona of a comedic magician, performing a dazzling array of statistical tricks and maneuvers to unveil the hidden correlation between household spending on home maintenance and Netflix's stock price. Leveraging the powerful tools of correlation coefficients and p-values, we summoned the spirits of statistical significance to reveal the enchanting bond between these seemingly disparate entities.

Correlation and Regression:
Much like staging a captivating duet between two unlikely performers, we used correlation and regression analyses to choreograph the dance of the household spending and Netflix's stock price. These analyses allowed us to tease out the subtle nuances of their relationship, unraveling a story that can only be described as a captivating tango of financial variables.

Ethical Considerations:
As responsible stewards of data and knowledge, we upheld the principles of academic integrity and research ethics throughout our expedition. We ensured that our data collection and analysis adhered to the highest standards of transparency and rigor, safeguarding the sanctity of our findings and contributing to the scholarly discourse with unwavering conscientiousness.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on home maintenance and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9738290, r-squared of 0.9483430, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Streaming Subscriptions and Swaying Spending: Unveiling the Unlikely Association Between Annual US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and Netflix's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the unexpected connection between household spending on home maintenance and the stock price of the prominent streaming service provider, Netflix (NFLX). Leveraging comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from 2003 to 2022, our study uncovers a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9738290 and a minuscule p-value of less than 0.01. These findings imply an intriguing relationship between the nitty-gritty of household upkeep and the flourishing fortunes of Netflix's stock. The results not only provide valuable insights for economists, but also offer a whimsical lens through which to contemplate the interplay between domestic diligence and digital entertainment. Our paper, in its witty and novel approach, challenges conventional economic wisdom and encourages a reevaluation of the seemingly mundane behaviors that may hold sway over the financial markets.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
As the old adage goes, "a penny saved is a penny earned," but what if those pennies saved on home maintenance were actually driving up the stock prices of Netflix? In this study, we embark on a whimsical journey into the curious correlation between annual US household spending on home maintenance and the stock price of everyone's favorite binge-watching companion, Netflix (NFLX).
While the link between economic trends and the stock market is a well-trodden path, our research uncovers a connection that is as unexpected as finding a hidden subplot in a blockbuster movie. Leveraging a robust dataset from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) spanning nearly two decades, we unearth a statistically significant correlation that would make even the most seasoned financial analysts do a double-take.
As we delve into this peculiar pairing, our study aims to not only tickle the fancy of economists and investors but also to inject a sense of levity into the traditionally serious domain of financial research. Through our bold and unorthodox approach, we hope to inspire a renaissance of curiosity and open-mindedness in the exploration of seemingly unrelated phenomena and their impact on the stock market.
So, grab your toolkit and popcorn, because we are about to unravel the unlikely association between frugal fixer-uppers and soaring stock prices in the ever-entertaining world of economics and finance. Let the adventure begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) for the period of 2003 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between annual US household spending on home maintenance and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). The correlation coefficient, determined to be 0.9738290, exhibited an intimate relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the stock price and the household maintenance spending had a secret pact to rise together, much like a compelling on-screen duo in a Netflix original series.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9483430 suggests that a substantial proportion, approximately 94.8%, of the variability in Netflix's stock price can be explained by the fluctuations in annual household spending on home maintenance. This indicates that the economic decisions made by households in maintaining their residences could significantly influence the performance of a leading player in the digital entertainment industry. It's a reminder that the pearls of wisdom from our grandparents about the value of a well-kept home may extend beyond just property upkeep.

The p-value of less than 0.01 accentuates the significance of the observed correlation, making it clear that these findings are not mere chance encounters. It’s as if the statistical analysis exclaimed, "Netflix and maintenance spending are a match made in data heaven!"

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) provides a graphical representation of the strong positive correlation between annual US household spending on home maintenance and Netflix's stock price. Each data point seems to be whispering, "There's more to us than meets the eye – the magic lies in the mundane!" The figure illustrates the striking alignment between the two variables and serves as a visual testament to this unexpected relationship, leaving even the most serious of data analysts with a raised eyebrow.

In summary, our results unfurl a captivating narrative of how the diligent acts of household maintenance may intertwine with the fate of a high-flying stock like Netflix. This illuminating discovery not only sheds light on the intricate dynamics of economic phenomena but also invites a jovial contemplation of the unlikeliest of correlations in the realm of finance. The stage is set for a new wave of speculation, where the stock market meets the humble home – a true tale of "nail-biting" economics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on home maintenance and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Streaming Subscriptions and Swaying Spending: Unveiling the Unlikely Association Between Annual US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and Netflix's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the unexpected connection between household spending on home maintenance and the stock price of the prominent streaming service provider, Netflix (NFLX). Leveraging comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from 2003 to 2022, our study uncovers a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9738290 and a minuscule p-value of less than 0.01. These findings imply an intriguing relationship between the nitty-gritty of household upkeep and the flourishing fortunes of Netflix's stock. The results not only provide valuable insights for economists, but also offer a whimsical lens through which to contemplate the interplay between domestic diligence and digital entertainment. Our paper, in its witty and novel approach, challenges conventional economic wisdom and encourages a reevaluation of the seemingly mundane behaviors that may hold sway over the financial markets.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The underpinning of our study hinges on unraveling the enigmatic relationship between annual US household spending on home maintenance and the stock price of Netflix (NFLX). The existing literature offers a plethora of insights into consumer spending behavior, stock market trends, and the interplay between seemingly unrelated variables. Smith et al. (2015) elucidate the impact of consumer sentiment on stock price movements, while Doe and Jones (2018) delve into the intricate dynamics of household expenditure. However, what these esteemed scholars may not have foreseen is the tantalizing correlation we are about to unearth between tightening a loose screw and Netflix’s stock soaring to new heights.
Turning our attention to non-fiction works that may shed light on our unconventional investigation, "Economics of Streaming Services" by Johnson (2019) and "Personal Finance Essentials" by Brown (2020) provide foundational knowledge on consumer spending habits and the economic forces at play in the entertainment industry. However, it is in the realm of fiction that we may find unexpected insights. "The Wealthy Gardener" by John Soforic and "The Subtle Art of Not Giving a F*ck" by Mark Manson may hold the secret to a whimsical connection between household frugality and entertainment indulgence.
Venturing further afield, we encounter the unexpected and unconventional. In an unprecedented move, the authors took the liberty to conduct a thorough analysis of retailers' receipts, finding an intriguing pattern in the purchases of duct tape and popcorn correlating with fluctuations in Netflix's stock price. This unorthodox approach, while unconventional, has proven to illuminate a previously unnoticed relationship between hedging against leaky faucets and investing in a riveting movie night.
In summary, while the literature provides invaluable insights into consumer behavior, economic factors, and their impact on the stock market, it is the unassuming combination of household maintenance and digital entertainment that promises to add a touch of whimsy to the often austere world of economic analysis.

[[RESULTS]]
The data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) for the period of 2003 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between annual US household spending on home maintenance and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). The correlation coefficient, determined to be 0.9738290, exhibited an intimate relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the stock price and the household maintenance spending had a secret pact to rise together, much like a compelling on-screen duo in a Netflix original series.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9483430 suggests that a substantial proportion, approximately 94.8%, of the variability in Netflix's stock price can be explained by the fluctuations in annual household spending on home maintenance. This indicates that the economic decisions made by households in maintaining their residences could significantly influence the performance of a leading player in the digital entertainment industry. It's a reminder that the pearls of wisdom from our grandparents about the value of a well-kept home may extend beyond just property upkeep.
The p-value of less than 0.01 accentuates the significance of the observed correlation, making it clear that these findings are not mere chance encounters. It’s as if the statistical analysis exclaimed, "Netflix and maintenance spending are a match made in data heaven!"
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) provides a graphical representation of the strong positive correlation between annual US household spending on home maintenance and Netflix's stock price. Each data point seems to be whispering, "There's more to us than meets the eye – the magic lies in the mundane!" The figure illustrates the striking alignment between the two variables and serves as a visual testament to this unexpected relationship, leaving even the most serious of data analysts with a raised eyebrow.
In summary, our results unfurl a captivating narrative of how the diligent acts of household maintenance may intertwine with the fate of a high-flying stock like Netflix. This illuminating discovery not only sheds light on the intricate dynamics of economic phenomena but also invites a jovial contemplation of the unlikeliest of correlations in the realm of finance. The stage is set for a new wave of speculation, where the stock market meets the humble home – a true tale of "nail-biting" economics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study provide substantial support for the existence of a compelling and unexpected relationship between annual US household spending on home maintenance and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). The results mirror and also extend the quirkiness documented in the literature review, where seemingly unrelated variables form an uncanny bond reminiscent of a modern-day odd couple. This correlation, with a staggering coefficient of 0.9738290 and a p-value akin to discovering a rare coin in your change, underscores the potential impact of mundane domestic activities on the financial markets. It's as if a leaky faucet in Ohio could trigger a spike in Netflix stock prices in California, reminiscent of a synchronized dance across the country.

Our study not only joins the chorus of previous research highlighting unexpected correlations but also serves as a lighthearted testament to the capricious nature of economic phenomena. The strong r-squared value of 0.9483430 underscores the remarkably high level of predictability in Netflix's stock price attributable to variations in home maintenance spending. It's as if the financial markets have a penchant for household orderliness, rewarding diligent broom wielders and savvy screw-tighteners with a red carpet of stock market returns.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visualizes this unlikely romance between household maintenance and Netflix's stock price in a manner reminiscent of a Rom-Com movie poster – the mismatched couple that defies all odds. This tangible representation of the relationship is a poignant reminder that, even in the world of economic analysis, there's room for whimsy and unexpected plot twists.

The exquisite alignment of our results with the existing literature is a profound reminder that economic relationships can often spring from the unlikeliest of places. It's as if the mundanity of domestic upkeep has donned a cape and mask, emerging as an unlikely hero in the financial theatre. Much like a classic comedy duo, the household maintenance and Netflix's stock price dance in an intricate choreography that leaves scholars and investors alike pleasantly surprised, if not slightly bemused.

The implications of these findings are not to be taken lightly, as they challenge traditional economic wisdom and encourage a reevaluation of the seemingly mundane behaviors that may hold sway over the financial markets. They also beckon a jovial contemplation of the unexpected correlations in the labyrinth of economic forces. In conclusion, our study whimsically uncovers a new frontier in economic analysis, reminding us that in the grand theatre of finance, even the most unconventional relationships deserve a standing ovation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on home maintenance and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Streaming Subscriptions and Swaying Spending: Unveiling the Unlikely Association Between Annual US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and Netflix's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This groundbreaking research delves into the unexpected connection between household spending on home maintenance and the stock price of the prominent streaming service provider, Netflix (NFLX). Leveraging comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from 2003 to 2022, our study uncovers a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9738290 and a minuscule p-value of less than 0.01. These findings imply an intriguing relationship between the nitty-gritty of household upkeep and the flourishing fortunes of Netflix's stock. The results not only provide valuable insights for economists, but also offer a whimsical lens through which to contemplate the interplay between domestic diligence and digital entertainment. Our paper, in its witty and novel approach, challenges conventional economic wisdom and encourages a reevaluation of the seemingly mundane behaviors that may hold sway over the financial markets.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As the old adage goes, "a penny saved is a penny earned," but what if those pennies saved on home maintenance were actually driving up the stock prices of Netflix? In this study, we embark on a whimsical journey into the curious correlation between annual US household spending on home maintenance and the stock price of everyone's favorite binge-watching companion, Netflix (NFLX).
While the link between economic trends and the stock market is a well-trodden path, our research uncovers a connection that is as unexpected as finding a hidden subplot in a blockbuster movie. Leveraging a robust dataset from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) spanning nearly two decades, we unearth a statistically significant correlation that would make even the most seasoned financial analysts do a double-take.
As we delve into this peculiar pairing, our study aims to not only tickle the fancy of economists and investors but also to inject a sense of levity into the traditionally serious domain of financial research. Through our bold and unorthodox approach, we hope to inspire a renaissance of curiosity and open-mindedness in the exploration of seemingly unrelated phenomena and their impact on the stock market.
So, grab your toolkit and popcorn, because we are about to unravel the unlikely association between frugal fixer-uppers and soaring stock prices in the ever-entertaining world of economics and finance. Let the adventure begin!

[[RESULTS]]
The data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) for the period of 2003 to 2022 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between annual US household spending on home maintenance and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). The correlation coefficient, determined to be 0.9738290, exhibited an intimate relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if the stock price and the household maintenance spending had a secret pact to rise together, much like a compelling on-screen duo in a Netflix original series.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9483430 suggests that a substantial proportion, approximately 94.8%, of the variability in Netflix's stock price can be explained by the fluctuations in annual household spending on home maintenance. This indicates that the economic decisions made by households in maintaining their residences could significantly influence the performance of a leading player in the digital entertainment industry. It's a reminder that the pearls of wisdom from our grandparents about the value of a well-kept home may extend beyond just property upkeep.
The p-value of less than 0.01 accentuates the significance of the observed correlation, making it clear that these findings are not mere chance encounters. It’s as if the statistical analysis exclaimed, "Netflix and maintenance spending are a match made in data heaven!"
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) provides a graphical representation of the strong positive correlation between annual US household spending on home maintenance and Netflix's stock price. Each data point seems to be whispering, "There's more to us than meets the eye – the magic lies in the mundane!" The figure illustrates the striking alignment between the two variables and serves as a visual testament to this unexpected relationship, leaving even the most serious of data analysts with a raised eyebrow.
In summary, our results unfurl a captivating narrative of how the diligent acts of household maintenance may intertwine with the fate of a high-flying stock like Netflix. This illuminating discovery not only sheds light on the intricate dynamics of economic phenomena but also invites a jovial contemplation of the unlikeliest of correlations in the realm of finance. The stage is set for a new wave of speculation, where the stock market meets the humble home – a true tale of "nail-biting" economics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a surprisingly robust and statistically significant correlation between annual US household spending on home maintenance and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). It seems that while households are busy tightening screws and fixing leaks, they may also be inadvertently boosting the fortunes of their favorite streaming service. Who would have thought that a well-maintained porch could lead to a surge in stock prices?

The strength of the correlation coefficient and the explanatory power of the r-squared value emphasize the striking relationship between these two seemingly disparate factors. It's as if the financial markets are applauding every household that diligently tends to its upkeep with a surge in stock prices for their chosen streaming platform.

As we wrap up this lively exploration, it's evident that there's more than meets the eye when it comes to the intersection of household behavior and stock market shenanigans. The correlation we've unveiled is a reminder that beneath the surface of economic trends, there may lie unexpected forces at play – a bit like finding a secret bonus level in an old video game.

Ultimately, this study challenges traditional economic wisdom and urges a more lighthearted view of the interplay between the nitty-gritty of household maintenance and the enigmatic fluctuations of the stock market. No more research is needed in this area; our findings are as solid as a well-constructed bookshelf. It's time for economists and investors to embrace this quirky connection and add a new twist to the storyline of financial analysis. After all, who doesn't love a good surprise ending in the world of economics?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Streaming Subscriptions and Swaying Spending: Unveiling the Unlikely Association Between Annual US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and Netflix's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Random Interdisciplinary Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Streaming Subscriptions and Swaying Spending: Unveiling the Unlikely Association Between Annual US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and Netflix's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Economic Inquiry and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Streaming Subscriptions and Swaying Spending: Unveiling the Unlikely Association Between Annual US Household Spending on Home Maintenance and Netflix's Stock Price with an abstract of This groundbreaking research delves into the unexpected connection between household spending on home maintenance and the stock price of the prominent streaming service provider, Netflix (NFLX). Leveraging comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from 2003 to 2022, our study uncovers a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9738290 and a minuscule p-value of less than 0.01. These findings imply an intriguing relationship between the nitty-gritty of household upkeep and the flourishing fortunes of Netflix's stock. The results not only provide valuable insights for economists, but also offer a whimsical lens through which to contemplate the interplay between domestic diligence and digital entertainment. Our paper, in its witty and novel approach, challenges conventional economic wisdom and encourages a reevaluation of the seemingly mundane behaviors that may hold sway over the financial markets.

ChatGPT:

household spending, home maintenance, Netflix stock price, correlation coefficient, Bureau of Labor Statistics, LSEG Analytics Refinitiv, US household spending, streaming subscriptions, financial markets, economic impact, domestic diligence, digital entertainment

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Annual US household spending on home maintenance
Detailed data title: Average annual household spend on home maintenance
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on home maintenance

Netflix's stock price (NFLX)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Netflix (NFLX) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Netflix's stock price (NFLX)

Correlation r = 0.9738290 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9483430 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Netflix's stock price (NFLX)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on home maintenance) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.0E-13. 0.0000000000004974856607825113
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 5.0E-11% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,010,108,187,695 random variables You don't actually need 2 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.93, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Annual US household spending on home maintenance (Household spend)965997110111151131117611381112112011531182129314381437161617031879215823352559
Netflix's stock price (NFLX) (Stock price)0.854.111.83.873.713.794.227.932510.0413.652.449.15109124.96196.1259.28326.1539605.61




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([965,997,1101,1115,1131,1176,1138,1112,1120,1153,1182,1293,1438,1437,1616,1703,1879,2158,2335,2559,])
array_2 = np.array([0.85,4.11,1.8,3.87,3.71,3.79,4.22,7.93,25,10.04,13.6,52.4,49.15,109,124.96,196.1,259.28,326.1,539,605.61,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on home maintenance"
array_2_name = "Netflix's stock price (NFLX)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 2143 · Black Variable ID: 19906 · Red Variable ID: 1584
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0