about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,113 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Ann Arbor and the second variable is Motor vehicle thefts.  The chart goes from 1985 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the smog lifted, so did the stolen cars. It turns out the air was so filthy that even the thieves couldn't take a deep breath and decided to clean up their act instead. It's a classic case of clearer air leading to cleaner getaways! Who knew that the real key to reducing auto theft was just freshening up the atmosphere in more ways than one?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a dimly lit street in Ann Arbor, Michigan, with tall buildings looming in the background. The air is filled with a thick haze of pollutants, giving the scene a murky and grim appearance. In the midst of this foggy atmosphere, a car alarm blares loudly, drawing attention to a potential motor vehicle theft in progress. The image should capture the eerie quality of the polluted air and the tension of the unfolding crime, all while maintaining a realistic and gritty visual style. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Unhealthy air quality in Ann Arbor and Motor vehicle thefts. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Realistic a Polaroid photo Art nouveau A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Unhealthy air quality in Ann Arbor and Motor vehicle thefts together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: The hazy air is thick with pollutants in Ann Arbor as a car alarm blares in the distance, signaling a motor vehicle theft in progress.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: The hazy air is thick with pollutants in Ann Arbor as a car alarm blares in the distance, signaling a motor vehicle theft in progress. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a dimly lit street in Ann Arbor, Michigan, with tall buildings looming in the background. The air is filled with a thick haze of pollutants, giving the scene a murky and grim appearance. In the midst of this foggy atmosphere, a car alarm blares loudly, drawing attention to a potential motor vehicle theft in progress. The image should capture the eerie quality of the polluted air and the tension of the unfolding crime, all while maintaining a realistic and gritty visual style.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Ann Arbor caused Motor vehicle thefts to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Choking on Fumes: The Relationship Between Air Pollution and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ann Arbor

Journal of Environmental Criminology and Atmospheric Chemistry

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ann Arbor and Motor vehicle thefts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6774112 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Choking on Fumes: The Relationship Between Air Pollution and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ann Arbor

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the underexplored connection between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we analyzed three and a half decades of data to determine whether the stifling grip of air pollution has any correlation with the uptick in motor vehicle thefts. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6774112 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a noteworthy association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. While the vehicular emissions hang heavy in the air, it seems that the scent of opportunity for theft may be lingering as well. Our research sheds light on the breathless dance between atmospheric pollution and criminal activity, proving that there is more than just foul air to worry about in Ann Arbor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ann Arbor and Motor vehicle thefts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Choking on Fumes: The Relationship Between Air Pollution and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ann Arbor

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the underexplored connection between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we analyzed three and a half decades of data to determine whether the stifling grip of air pollution has any correlation with the uptick in motor vehicle thefts. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6774112 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a noteworthy association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. While the vehicular emissions hang heavy in the air, it seems that the scent of opportunity for theft may be lingering as well. Our research sheds light on the breathless dance between atmospheric pollution and criminal activity, proving that there is more than just foul air to worry about in Ann Arbor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

It's a common quip to say that "crime is in the air," but what if we took that saying quite literally? In this paper, we delve into the fascinating and perhaps unexpected relationship between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in the quaint city of Ann Arbor. While the city may be known for its picturesque streets and academic prowess, it also grapples with the thorny issue of air pollution. And if past research has taught us anything, it's that sometimes the most intriguing connections are lurking in the unlikeliest of places.

As we wade into this investigation, it's important to acknowledge the myriad elements that shape the urban landscape of Ann Arbor. From the hazy emissions that swirl through the city streets to the sound of a car engine shattering the stillness of the night, there are countless facets that play into the tapestry of urban life. Our aim is to untangle this web of influences and discern whether there's a palpable link between the air pollution hanging heavy in the sky and the pilfering of motor vehicles.

With data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services at our disposal, we undertook a meticulous analysis spanning over three and a half decades. Our findings proffer an intriguing glimpse into the intertwined fates of vehicular emissions and larcenous inclinations. It may seem far-fetched at first, but as our analysis unfolds, we reveal a compelling correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

So, buckle up and take a deep breath, because we're about to traverse the convoluted highway of air pollution and motor vehicle thefts. And who knows, by the end of this journey, we might just find that the scent of opportunity is more than a mere figure of speech.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ann Arbor and Motor vehicle thefts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Choking on Fumes: The Relationship Between Air Pollution and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ann Arbor

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the underexplored connection between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we analyzed three and a half decades of data to determine whether the stifling grip of air pollution has any correlation with the uptick in motor vehicle thefts. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6774112 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a noteworthy association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. While the vehicular emissions hang heavy in the air, it seems that the scent of opportunity for theft may be lingering as well. Our research sheds light on the breathless dance between atmospheric pollution and criminal activity, proving that there is more than just foul air to worry about in Ann Arbor.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
It's a common quip to say that "crime is in the air," but what if we took that saying quite literally? In this paper, we delve into the fascinating and perhaps unexpected relationship between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in the quaint city of Ann Arbor. While the city may be known for its picturesque streets and academic prowess, it also grapples with the thorny issue of air pollution. And if past research has taught us anything, it's that sometimes the most intriguing connections are lurking in the unlikeliest of places.
As we wade into this investigation, it's important to acknowledge the myriad elements that shape the urban landscape of Ann Arbor. From the hazy emissions that swirl through the city streets to the sound of a car engine shattering the stillness of the night, there are countless facets that play into the tapestry of urban life. Our aim is to untangle this web of influences and discern whether there's a palpable link between the air pollution hanging heavy in the sky and the pilfering of motor vehicles.
With data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services at our disposal, we undertook a meticulous analysis spanning over three and a half decades. Our findings proffer an intriguing glimpse into the intertwined fates of vehicular emissions and larcenous inclinations. It may seem far-fetched at first, but as our analysis unfolds, we reveal a compelling correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
So, buckle up and take a deep breath, because we're about to traverse the convoluted highway of air pollution and motor vehicle thefts. And who knows, by the end of this journey, we might just find that the scent of opportunity is more than a mere figure of speech.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous studies have probed various facets of urban life and its impact on criminal activities. Smith et al. (2010) highlight the influence of environmental factors on crime rates, shedding light on the potential interplay between air quality and criminal behavior. Doe and Jones (2015) examined the correlation between vehicular emissions and property crimes, offering early insights into the potential links between air pollution and criminal activities, although their work remained inconclusive.

Turning to non-fiction sources, "The Air That We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis of Urban Air Quality" (Garcia, 2018) provides a thorough exploration of the detrimental effects of air pollution on urban environments. Similarly, "Traffic and Its Discontents: The Societal Impact of Vehicular Emissions" (Wong, 2019) delves into the multifaceted consequences of vehicular emissions, painting a comprehensive picture of their potential societal implications. However, neither of these sources directly addresses the potential relationship between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts.

On a more fictional note, the famous crime novel "The Sooty Suspect" (Black, 2003) presents an imaginative narrative that toys with the idea of air pollution as a catalyst for criminal activities. Likewise, "Smoke Signals of Mischief" (Gray, 2011) takes readers on a thrilling ride through the smog-choked streets of a fictional city, intertwining atmospheric pollution and criminal intrigue in an unprecedented manner.

In the realm of cinema, "The Italian Job" (2003) and "Gone in 60 Seconds" (2000) offer cinematic perspectives that tangentially touch upon the phenomenon of motor vehicle thefts, albeit in a more glamorous and action-packed light.

While these sources provide intriguing insights into the topic at hand, they merely scratch the surface of the unexplored connection between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor. This paper aims to build upon their foundations and unveil the hidden correlation between these seemingly unrelated elements, bringing a breath of fresh air to the field of criminology and environmental studies alike.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ann Arbor and Motor vehicle thefts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1985 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Choking on Fumes: The Relationship Between Air Pollution and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ann Arbor

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the underexplored connection between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we analyzed three and a half decades of data to determine whether the stifling grip of air pollution has any correlation with the uptick in motor vehicle thefts. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6774112 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a noteworthy association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. While the vehicular emissions hang heavy in the air, it seems that the scent of opportunity for theft may be lingering as well. Our research sheds light on the breathless dance between atmospheric pollution and criminal activity, proving that there is more than just foul air to worry about in Ann Arbor.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
It's a common quip to say that "crime is in the air," but what if we took that saying quite literally? In this paper, we delve into the fascinating and perhaps unexpected relationship between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in the quaint city of Ann Arbor. While the city may be known for its picturesque streets and academic prowess, it also grapples with the thorny issue of air pollution. And if past research has taught us anything, it's that sometimes the most intriguing connections are lurking in the unlikeliest of places.
As we wade into this investigation, it's important to acknowledge the myriad elements that shape the urban landscape of Ann Arbor. From the hazy emissions that swirl through the city streets to the sound of a car engine shattering the stillness of the night, there are countless facets that play into the tapestry of urban life. Our aim is to untangle this web of influences and discern whether there's a palpable link between the air pollution hanging heavy in the sky and the pilfering of motor vehicles.
With data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services at our disposal, we undertook a meticulous analysis spanning over three and a half decades. Our findings proffer an intriguing glimpse into the intertwined fates of vehicular emissions and larcenous inclinations. It may seem far-fetched at first, but as our analysis unfolds, we reveal a compelling correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
So, buckle up and take a deep breath, because we're about to traverse the convoluted highway of air pollution and motor vehicle thefts. And who knows, by the end of this journey, we might just find that the scent of opportunity is more than a mere figure of speech.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
Our research team embarked on a digital odyssey across the vast expanse of the internet, sifting through an array of data sources to uncover the murky relationship between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor. The primary sources of data included reports from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) documenting air quality measurements, and databases from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services capturing the harrowing tales of stolen vehicles. We amassed a comprehensive dataset spanning from the sepia-toned era of 1985 to the digital age of 2022, ensuring that no stone was left unturned in our pursuit of understanding this peculiar association.

Air Pollution Exposure Assessment:
To gauge the suffocating impact of air pollution, we harnessed a blend of air quality indices, pollutant concentration levels, and atmospheric measurements obtained from the EPA's treasure trove of environmental data. Our approach involved dissecting the ebb and flow of pollutants, akin to unraveling the complex flavors of a gourmet dish, albeit with a less appetizing outcome. The collected data allowed us to quantify the ominous presence of particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, and other airborne offenders that taint the Ann Arbor skies with their noxious presence.

Motor Vehicle Theft Analysis:
Evaluating the mischievous escapades of car thieves demanded a methodical dissection of FBI databases containing reports of pilfered automobiles. Our team combed through the labyrinthine records to chart the rise and fall of vehicular thefts, akin to untangling the plot of a convoluted whodunit novel, though with far less intrigue and significantly more legally punishable acts. Each stolen vehicle was documented, cataloged, and analyzed to uncover patterns and fluctuations in these felonious activities, much like detectives piecing together clues at the scene of a crime, minus the trench coats and noir ambiance.

Statistical Analysis:
Armed with a trove of data, our team employed rigorous statistical methods to unearth the hidden connections between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts. The charismatic duo of correlation and regression analysis took center stage, shedding light on the dance of these seemingly discordant phenomena. We scrutinized the correlation coefficient and p-values with the fervor of a fastidious sommelier evaluating the bouquet of a fine wine, except in this case, the notes were less floral and more criminal in nature.

Limitations:
While our research endeavors aimed to unravel the intricate tango between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts, it's important to acknowledge the limitations of our study. The inherent complexities of urban dynamics and the myriad confounding variables lurking in the shadows may cast a pall over the causality of our findings. Additionally, the nuances of criminal behavior and the fickle nature of atmospheric pollutants introduce an element of uncertainty, much like trying to predict the outcome of a coin toss amidst a gust of wind.

In summary, our research methodology weaved together a tapestry of data sources, analytical frameworks, and a touch of statistical alchemy to illuminate the entangled fates of air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in the whimsical city of Ann Arbor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ann Arbor and Motor vehicle thefts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1985 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6774112, r-squared of 0.4588859, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Choking on Fumes: The Relationship Between Air Pollution and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ann Arbor

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the underexplored connection between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we analyzed three and a half decades of data to determine whether the stifling grip of air pollution has any correlation with the uptick in motor vehicle thefts. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6774112 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a noteworthy association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. While the vehicular emissions hang heavy in the air, it seems that the scent of opportunity for theft may be lingering as well. Our research sheds light on the breathless dance between atmospheric pollution and criminal activity, proving that there is more than just foul air to worry about in Ann Arbor.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
It's a common quip to say that "crime is in the air," but what if we took that saying quite literally? In this paper, we delve into the fascinating and perhaps unexpected relationship between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in the quaint city of Ann Arbor. While the city may be known for its picturesque streets and academic prowess, it also grapples with the thorny issue of air pollution. And if past research has taught us anything, it's that sometimes the most intriguing connections are lurking in the unlikeliest of places.
As we wade into this investigation, it's important to acknowledge the myriad elements that shape the urban landscape of Ann Arbor. From the hazy emissions that swirl through the city streets to the sound of a car engine shattering the stillness of the night, there are countless facets that play into the tapestry of urban life. Our aim is to untangle this web of influences and discern whether there's a palpable link between the air pollution hanging heavy in the sky and the pilfering of motor vehicles.
With data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services at our disposal, we undertook a meticulous analysis spanning over three and a half decades. Our findings proffer an intriguing glimpse into the intertwined fates of vehicular emissions and larcenous inclinations. It may seem far-fetched at first, but as our analysis unfolds, we reveal a compelling correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
So, buckle up and take a deep breath, because we're about to traverse the convoluted highway of air pollution and motor vehicle thefts. And who knows, by the end of this journey, we might just find that the scent of opportunity is more than a mere figure of speech.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data spanning the years 1985 to 2022 uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6774112, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.4588859 suggests that approximately 45.89% of the variance in motor vehicle thefts can be explained by changes in air pollution. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the existence of a significant association between these two phenomena.

The concurrent rise in air pollution and motor vehicle thefts is visually illustrated in Figure 1, where the data points coalesce into a compelling scatterplot that mirrors the entwined fate of these seemingly distinct domains. The scatterplot graphically encapsulates the breathless dance between atmospheric pollution and criminal activity, offering a tangible depiction of the correlation we have uncovered.

It appears that as the haze of vehicular emissions hangs heavy in the air, the scent of opportunity for theft might be lingering not too far behind. This revelation serves as an important reminder that there are multiple dimensions to consider when addressing societal challenges, and in this case, foul air shares the stage with the disconcerting spike in motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor.

The strength of this correlation prompts further inquiry into the interplay between environmental factors and criminal behavior, encouraging a more holistic understanding of the urban landscape. Our research not only underscores the pressing need to address air pollution but also highlights the intricate nature of its repercussions, transcending the confines of respiratory health to permeate spheres of public safety and security.

In unraveling this unexpected link, we advocate for a comprehensive approach to urban issues, one that seeks to mitigate both the visible and unseen perils that pervade our cities. The discovery of this connection lays bare the curious confluence of pollutants and pilferage, inviting a nuanced examination of the forces at play in the urban milieu.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ann Arbor and Motor vehicle thefts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Choking on Fumes: The Relationship Between Air Pollution and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ann Arbor

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the underexplored connection between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we analyzed three and a half decades of data to determine whether the stifling grip of air pollution has any correlation with the uptick in motor vehicle thefts. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6774112 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a noteworthy association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. While the vehicular emissions hang heavy in the air, it seems that the scent of opportunity for theft may be lingering as well. Our research sheds light on the breathless dance between atmospheric pollution and criminal activity, proving that there is more than just foul air to worry about in Ann Arbor.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous studies have probed various facets of urban life and its impact on criminal activities. Smith et al. (2010) highlight the influence of environmental factors on crime rates, shedding light on the potential interplay between air quality and criminal behavior. Doe and Jones (2015) examined the correlation between vehicular emissions and property crimes, offering early insights into the potential links between air pollution and criminal activities, although their work remained inconclusive.
Turning to non-fiction sources, "The Air That We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis of Urban Air Quality" (Garcia, 2018) provides a thorough exploration of the detrimental effects of air pollution on urban environments. Similarly, "Traffic and Its Discontents: The Societal Impact of Vehicular Emissions" (Wong, 2019) delves into the multifaceted consequences of vehicular emissions, painting a comprehensive picture of their potential societal implications. However, neither of these sources directly addresses the potential relationship between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts.
On a more fictional note, the famous crime novel "The Sooty Suspect" (Black, 2003) presents an imaginative narrative that toys with the idea of air pollution as a catalyst for criminal activities. Likewise, "Smoke Signals of Mischief" (Gray, 2011) takes readers on a thrilling ride through the smog-choked streets of a fictional city, intertwining atmospheric pollution and criminal intrigue in an unprecedented manner.
In the realm of cinema, "The Italian Job" (2003) and "Gone in 60 Seconds" (2000) offer cinematic perspectives that tangentially touch upon the phenomenon of motor vehicle thefts, albeit in a more glamorous and action-packed light.
While these sources provide intriguing insights into the topic at hand, they merely scratch the surface of the unexplored connection between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor. This paper aims to build upon their foundations and unveil the hidden correlation between these seemingly unrelated elements, bringing a breath of fresh air to the field of criminology and environmental studies alike.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data spanning the years 1985 to 2022 uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6774112, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.4588859 suggests that approximately 45.89% of the variance in motor vehicle thefts can be explained by changes in air pollution. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the existence of a significant association between these two phenomena.
The concurrent rise in air pollution and motor vehicle thefts is visually illustrated in Figure 1, where the data points coalesce into a compelling scatterplot that mirrors the entwined fate of these seemingly distinct domains. The scatterplot graphically encapsulates the breathless dance between atmospheric pollution and criminal activity, offering a tangible depiction of the correlation we have uncovered.
It appears that as the haze of vehicular emissions hangs heavy in the air, the scent of opportunity for theft might be lingering not too far behind. This revelation serves as an important reminder that there are multiple dimensions to consider when addressing societal challenges, and in this case, foul air shares the stage with the disconcerting spike in motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor.
The strength of this correlation prompts further inquiry into the interplay between environmental factors and criminal behavior, encouraging a more holistic understanding of the urban landscape. Our research not only underscores the pressing need to address air pollution but also highlights the intricate nature of its repercussions, transcending the confines of respiratory health to permeate spheres of public safety and security.
In unraveling this unexpected link, we advocate for a comprehensive approach to urban issues, one that seeks to mitigate both the visible and unseen perils that pervade our cities. The discovery of this connection lays bare the curious confluence of pollutants and pilferage, inviting a nuanced examination of the forces at play in the urban milieu.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study uncovers a hitherto unexplored relationship between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor, demonstrating a surprising correlation that has significant implications for both criminology and environmental studies. Our findings provide support to the prior research that hinted at the potential links between atmospheric pollution and criminal activities. While the concept of air pollution engendering criminal behavior may initially sound like a far-fetched plotline from a fictional crime novel, our results corroborate the serious nature of this it.

The significant correlation coefficient of 0.6774112 and the low p-value reinforce the substantial association between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts, aligning with the findings of Smith et al. (2010) and Doe and Jones (2015) who also hinted at similar connections. While these previous studies may not have specifically delved into the nuanced relationship between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts, the groundwork laid by their inquiries into the broader influence of environmental factors on criminal behavior has undoubtedly paved the way for our revelatory discovery. It seems that these environmental factors are not just a lot of hot air after all.

Furthermore, our results also resonate with the comprehensive analysis of urban air quality by Garcia (2018) and the exploration of the societal impact of vehicular emissions by Wong (2019). While these works did not directly examine the potential connection between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts, their elucidation of the detrimental effects of air pollution and vehicular emissions on urban environments tacitly acknowledged the far-reaching consequences of these factors, perhaps akin to unwittingly leaving breadcrumbs for us to follow in our quest for uncovering hidden correlations.

The visual representation of our findings in Figure 1, with data points coalescing into a compelling scatterplot, not only captures the entwined fate of air pollution and motor vehicle thefts but also serves as a stark reminder of the multifaceted nature of urban challenges. It is a tangible depiction of the breathless dance we have uncovered, reflecting the unseen interplay between pollutants and pilferage, a veritable urban tango of mysterious movements.

In conclusion, our research contributes unique insight into the entangled relationship between air pollution and criminal activity, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach to addressing urban challenges. Beyond the visible haze of vehicular emissions lies an undercurrent of opportunity for theft, creating a complex web of influences that transcend traditional domains of criminology and environmental studies. In addressing the breathless dance between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts, we advocate for a more holistic understanding of urban dynamics, one that considers the unseen perils that lurk beneath the smoggy veil and investigates the whimsical waltz of pollutants and pilferage.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Ann Arbor and Motor vehicle thefts. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Choking on Fumes: The Relationship Between Air Pollution and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ann Arbor

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the underexplored connection between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we analyzed three and a half decades of data to determine whether the stifling grip of air pollution has any correlation with the uptick in motor vehicle thefts. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6774112 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a noteworthy association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. While the vehicular emissions hang heavy in the air, it seems that the scent of opportunity for theft may be lingering as well. Our research sheds light on the breathless dance between atmospheric pollution and criminal activity, proving that there is more than just foul air to worry about in Ann Arbor.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
It's a common quip to say that "crime is in the air," but what if we took that saying quite literally? In this paper, we delve into the fascinating and perhaps unexpected relationship between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in the quaint city of Ann Arbor. While the city may be known for its picturesque streets and academic prowess, it also grapples with the thorny issue of air pollution. And if past research has taught us anything, it's that sometimes the most intriguing connections are lurking in the unlikeliest of places.
As we wade into this investigation, it's important to acknowledge the myriad elements that shape the urban landscape of Ann Arbor. From the hazy emissions that swirl through the city streets to the sound of a car engine shattering the stillness of the night, there are countless facets that play into the tapestry of urban life. Our aim is to untangle this web of influences and discern whether there's a palpable link between the air pollution hanging heavy in the sky and the pilfering of motor vehicles.
With data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services at our disposal, we undertook a meticulous analysis spanning over three and a half decades. Our findings proffer an intriguing glimpse into the intertwined fates of vehicular emissions and larcenous inclinations. It may seem far-fetched at first, but as our analysis unfolds, we reveal a compelling correlation between these seemingly disparate phenomena.
So, buckle up and take a deep breath, because we're about to traverse the convoluted highway of air pollution and motor vehicle thefts. And who knows, by the end of this journey, we might just find that the scent of opportunity is more than a mere figure of speech.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data spanning the years 1985 to 2022 uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6774112, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.4588859 suggests that approximately 45.89% of the variance in motor vehicle thefts can be explained by changes in air pollution. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, supporting the existence of a significant association between these two phenomena.
The concurrent rise in air pollution and motor vehicle thefts is visually illustrated in Figure 1, where the data points coalesce into a compelling scatterplot that mirrors the entwined fate of these seemingly distinct domains. The scatterplot graphically encapsulates the breathless dance between atmospheric pollution and criminal activity, offering a tangible depiction of the correlation we have uncovered.
It appears that as the haze of vehicular emissions hangs heavy in the air, the scent of opportunity for theft might be lingering not too far behind. This revelation serves as an important reminder that there are multiple dimensions to consider when addressing societal challenges, and in this case, foul air shares the stage with the disconcerting spike in motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor.
The strength of this correlation prompts further inquiry into the interplay between environmental factors and criminal behavior, encouraging a more holistic understanding of the urban landscape. Our research not only underscores the pressing need to address air pollution but also highlights the intricate nature of its repercussions, transcending the confines of respiratory health to permeate spheres of public safety and security.
In unraveling this unexpected link, we advocate for a comprehensive approach to urban issues, one that seeks to mitigate both the visible and unseen perils that pervade our cities. The discovery of this connection lays bare the curious confluence of pollutants and pilferage, inviting a nuanced examination of the forces at play in the urban milieu.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study illuminates the palpable correlation between the suffocating embrace of air pollution and the surge in motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor. The significant correlation coefficient and p-value below 0.01 underscore the compelling association between these seemingly incongruent phenomena. The scent of opportunity seems to linger amidst the noxious fumes, painting a picture of criminal inclinations intertwining with environmental perils. It's as if the city streets whisper in a raspy voice, "Take a deep breath, and drive away."

The r-squared value of 0.4588859 indicates that nearly 46% of the variance in motor vehicle thefts can be attributed to changes in air pollution. This statistic serves as a reminder that while we strive to clear the air, we must also confront the murky undercurrents of criminal activity that permeate the urban landscape. As the scatterplot visually captures the entwined fate of these domains, it seems that the intersection of atmospheric pollution and criminal impulses presents an intricate tango, where the dancers are left breathless and the spectators, intrigued.

Our findings underscore the need for a comprehensive approach to urban challenges, one that addresses not only the visible smog but also the elusive specter of criminal behavior. As we draw the curtain on this inquiry, it becomes evident that the discordant duet of vehicular emissions and theft requires concerted attention. Perhaps it's time to clear the air, not only literally but also metaphorically, by acknowledging the multilayered tapestry of influences that shape the city's dynamics.

In light of these revelations, it is clear that further research in this area may yield marginal returns, akin to searching for a needle in a polluted haystack. Therefore, we assert that there is no dire need for additional investigation into this particular correlation. After all, we wouldn't want to keep driving around in circles, chasing after the same exhaust fumes and stolen car stereos.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Choking on Fumes: The Relationship Between Air Pollution and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ann Arbor. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Environmental Criminology and Atmospheric Chemistry


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Choking on Fumes: The Relationship Between Air Pollution and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ann Arbor. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for Urban Environmental Research and Analysis (SUERA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Choking on Fumes: The Relationship Between Air Pollution and Motor Vehicle Thefts in Ann Arbor with an abstract of This study delves into the underexplored connection between air pollution and motor vehicle thefts in Ann Arbor. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we analyzed three and a half decades of data to determine whether the stifling grip of air pollution has any correlation with the uptick in motor vehicle thefts. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.6774112 with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a noteworthy association between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. While the vehicular emissions hang heavy in the air, it seems that the scent of opportunity for theft may be lingering as well. Our research sheds light on the breathless dance between atmospheric pollution and criminal activity, proving that there is more than just foul air to worry about in Ann Arbor.

ChatGPT:

Air pollution, motor vehicle thefts, Ann Arbor, correlation, environmental Protection Agency data, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, vehicular emissions, criminal activity, atmospheric pollution, correlation coefficient, criminal justice, pollution and crime

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Ann Arbor
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Ann Arbor, MI
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Ann Arbor

Motor vehicle thefts
Detailed data title: The motor vehicle theft rate per 100,000 residents in United States
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Motor vehicle thefts

Correlation r = 0.6774112 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4588859 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 45.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Motor vehicle thefts) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Ann Arbor) over the 38 years from 1985 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.0E-6. 0.0000029957942718709657000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.68 in 0.0003% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 333,801 random variables You don't actually need 333 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 37 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 37 because we have two variables measured over a period of 38 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.46, 0.82 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Ann Arbor (Bad air quality days)4.819283.030313.145520.560710.79817.142869.722224.670333.021984.941867.835826.909093.846159.510099.340663.561647.627128.493156.145251.99436.371192.747254.945061.098900.2762431.960786.043960.2747251.0958901.639340.8219181.6438401.6393400.273973
Motor vehicle thefts (Motor Vehicle Theft rate)463.5509.8531.9586.1634655.8659631.6606.3591.3560.3525.7505.7459.9422.5412.2430.5432.9433.7421.5416.8400.2364.9315.4259.2239.1230230.4221.3215.4222.2237.3237.7230.2220.8246255.9282.7




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.81928,3.0303,13.1455,20.5607,10.7981,7.14286,9.72222,4.67033,3.02198,4.94186,7.83582,6.90909,3.84615,9.51009,9.34066,3.56164,7.62712,8.49315,6.14525,1.9943,6.37119,2.74725,4.94506,1.0989,0,0.276243,1.96078,6.04396,0.274725,1.09589,0,1.63934,0.821918,1.64384,0,1.63934,0,0.273973,])
array_2 = np.array([463.5,509.8,531.9,586.1,634,655.8,659,631.6,606.3,591.3,560.3,525.7,505.7,459.9,422.5,412.2,430.5,432.9,433.7,421.5,416.8,400.2,364.9,315.4,259.2,239.1,230,230.4,221.3,215.4,222.2,237.3,237.7,230.2,220.8,246,255.9,282.7,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Ann Arbor"
array_2_name = "Motor vehicle thefts"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 2113 · Black Variable ID: 20271 · Red Variable ID: 20137
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0