about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,104 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is US per-person consumption of bottled water and the second variable is PACCAR's stock price (PCAR).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the demand for bottled water rose, so did the need for efficient transportation of this product. This led to an uptick in truck sales, boosting PACCAR's revenue and ultimately causing their stock price to surge. It's a ripple effect - from hydration to haulage, the market is interconnected in ways we never imagined. Stay thirsty for those profits, folks!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image showing a person standing in a lush garden, holding a bottle of water in one hand and checking their phone with the other. The person is wearing casual clothes. Show the screen of the phone displaying the stock chart of PACCAR with an upward trend. The scene should be filled with bright, natural sunlight to create a warm and serene atmosphere. The focus should be on the person and the phone, with the greenery in the background providing a refreshing outdoor ambiance. The image should have a calming and grounded feeling, reflective of a simple moment of relaxation and monitoring of personal finance. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: US per-person consumption of bottled water and PACCAR's stock price. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cubism An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Scalar art inspired by bauhaus Whimsical illustration
ChatGPT: Scalar art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both US per-person consumption of bottled water and PACCAR's stock price together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, a person is holding a bottle of water while checking their phone. On the phone screen, the stock price of PACCAR is displayed, showing an upward trend. The person is seen outdoors, surrounded by greenery and sunshine.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Scalar art ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, a person is holding a bottle of water while checking their phone. On the phone screen, the stock price of PACCAR is displayed, showing an upward trend. The person is seen outdoors, surrounded by greenery and sunshine. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image showing a person standing in a lush garden, holding a bottle of water in one hand and checking their phone with the other. The person is wearing casual clothes. Show the screen of the phone displaying the stock chart of PACCAR with an upward trend. The scene should be filled with bright, natural sunlight to create a warm and serene atmosphere. The focus should be on the person and the phone, with the greenery in the background providing a refreshing outdoor ambiance. The image should have a calming and grounded feeling, reflective of a simple moment of relaxation and monitoring of personal finance.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in US per-person consumption of bottled water caused PACCAR's stock price (PCAR) to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Ripple Effect: Investigating the Quirky Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and PACCAR Stock Price

The Journal of Quirky Economic Relationships

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US per-person consumption of bottled water and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9253920 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Ripple Effect: Investigating the Quirky Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and PACCAR Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected nexus between the per-person consumption of bottled water in the United States and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Using comprehensive data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embarked on a statistical exploration to unravel this curious association. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9253920 with a significance level of p < 0.01, spanning the years 2002 to 2022. While this study may seem as refreshing as a cool sip of bottled water on a hot day, the implications and interpretations of this relationship are as complex as the flavors in a gourmet water tasting. Join us as we navigate these uncharted waters, diving deep into the waves of market behavior and consumer preferences to shed light on this captivating, albeit unexpected connection. We invite you to embark on this intellectual endeavor with us, and together, we shall toast to the intriguing interplay of seemingly disparate elements in the financial landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US per-person consumption of bottled water and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Ripple Effect: Investigating the Quirky Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and PACCAR Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected nexus between the per-person consumption of bottled water in the United States and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Using comprehensive data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embarked on a statistical exploration to unravel this curious association. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9253920 with a significance level of p < 0.01, spanning the years 2002 to 2022. While this study may seem as refreshing as a cool sip of bottled water on a hot day, the implications and interpretations of this relationship are as complex as the flavors in a gourmet water tasting. Join us as we navigate these uncharted waters, diving deep into the waves of market behavior and consumer preferences to shed light on this captivating, albeit unexpected connection. We invite you to embark on this intellectual endeavor with us, and together, we shall toast to the intriguing interplay of seemingly disparate elements in the financial landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between consumer behavior and stock market performance has long been a subject of intrigue within the realm of financial research. In this paper, we delve into an unlikely pairing - the per-person consumption of bottled water in the United States and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). It's a seemingly peculiar amalgamation, yet our statistical analysis has uncovered a connection as intriguing as a twist of lemon in a refreshing glass of H2O.

Our investigation begins by examining the extensive dataset sourced from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), capturing the consumption patterns of bottled water in the US and the fluctuation of PACCAR's stock price over the period from 2002 to 2022. At first glance, one might assume that these variables are as unrelated as chlorine and a slice of cucumber in a spa water, but our analysis paints a different picture.

During our statistical escapade, we employed rigorous analysis methods and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9253920, leaving us with a degree of connectedness as striking as a perfectly synchronized swimming routine. This correlation was accompanied by a significance level of p < 0.01, illuminating a statistical association that is as robust as a bubbling spring on a sunny day.

While on the surface, one might be parched for a rational explanation for this intriguing linkage, the statistical evidence has quenched our thirst for understanding the intricacies of market behavior and consumer preferences. Yes, the relationship between bottled water consumption and stock prices may sound akin to the refreshing sound of a bottle cap being opened, but the implications and interpretations are as complex as distinguishing between the subtleties of mineral compositions in artisanal waters.

In embarking on this intellectual voyage, we invite you to join us in navigating the currents of market dynamics and the ebb and flow of consumer choices. Together, we embark on an exploration that leaves us with a newfound appreciation for the peculiar and unexpected connections that ripple across the financial landscape. So, grab a glass, raise it to this unconventional intersection, and let's not just dive in but make a splash in decoding this peculiar correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US per-person consumption of bottled water and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Ripple Effect: Investigating the Quirky Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and PACCAR Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected nexus between the per-person consumption of bottled water in the United States and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Using comprehensive data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embarked on a statistical exploration to unravel this curious association. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9253920 with a significance level of p < 0.01, spanning the years 2002 to 2022. While this study may seem as refreshing as a cool sip of bottled water on a hot day, the implications and interpretations of this relationship are as complex as the flavors in a gourmet water tasting. Join us as we navigate these uncharted waters, diving deep into the waves of market behavior and consumer preferences to shed light on this captivating, albeit unexpected connection. We invite you to embark on this intellectual endeavor with us, and together, we shall toast to the intriguing interplay of seemingly disparate elements in the financial landscape.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between consumer behavior and stock market performance has long been a subject of intrigue within the realm of financial research. In this paper, we delve into an unlikely pairing - the per-person consumption of bottled water in the United States and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). It's a seemingly peculiar amalgamation, yet our statistical analysis has uncovered a connection as intriguing as a twist of lemon in a refreshing glass of H2O.
Our investigation begins by examining the extensive dataset sourced from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), capturing the consumption patterns of bottled water in the US and the fluctuation of PACCAR's stock price over the period from 2002 to 2022. At first glance, one might assume that these variables are as unrelated as chlorine and a slice of cucumber in a spa water, but our analysis paints a different picture.
During our statistical escapade, we employed rigorous analysis methods and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9253920, leaving us with a degree of connectedness as striking as a perfectly synchronized swimming routine. This correlation was accompanied by a significance level of p < 0.01, illuminating a statistical association that is as robust as a bubbling spring on a sunny day.
While on the surface, one might be parched for a rational explanation for this intriguing linkage, the statistical evidence has quenched our thirst for understanding the intricacies of market behavior and consumer preferences. Yes, the relationship between bottled water consumption and stock prices may sound akin to the refreshing sound of a bottle cap being opened, but the implications and interpretations are as complex as distinguishing between the subtleties of mineral compositions in artisanal waters.
In embarking on this intellectual voyage, we invite you to join us in navigating the currents of market dynamics and the ebb and flow of consumer choices. Together, we embark on an exploration that leaves us with a newfound appreciation for the peculiar and unexpected connections that ripple across the financial landscape. So, grab a glass, raise it to this unconventional intersection, and let's not just dive in but make a splash in decoding this peculiar correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The intersection of consumer habits and stock market trends has long piqued the curiosity of researchers seeking to unravel the enigmatic dance between seemingly unrelated variables. Smith et al. (2010) were among the pioneers in this field, exploring the interconnectedness of consumer beverage choices and market fluctuations. Their study, "Bottled Beverages and the Bottom Line: A Quenching Quest into Market Quirks," laid the groundwork for investigations into the whimsical ways in which consumer behavior can intersect with financial indices.

While Smith et al.'s work provided valuable insights, it is important to consider the broader context of consumer preferences and economic indicators. The study by Doe and Jones (2015), "Thirsty for Returns: A Hydration-Based Analysis of Stock Performance," introduced an innovative approach to understanding the relationship between beverage consumption and market dynamics. Their findings suggested a potential correlation between the consumption of liquid assets, both in the form of bottled beverages and stock holdings.

As the exploration of this unconventional correlation unfolds, it is crucial to draw from a diverse array of sources to shed light on the multifaceted nature of this relationship. Works such as "Liquid Assets: An Economic Analysis of Beverage Trends" by Waterman (2018) and "Stocks and Sips: A Thirst-Quenching Approach to Market Analysis" by Beverage (2017) offer valuable insights into the intersection of consumer habits and financial markets.

In expanding the scope of inquiry, it is pertinent to consider fictional literature that may offer unexpected parallels to the topic at hand. The whimsical narratives of "The Thirsty Investor" by A. Quencher and "Bubbles and Bull Markets" by F. Izzy provide fictionalized accounts of the entwined nature of beverage choices and market speculation. While these works may not offer empirical evidence, they contribute to a broader understanding of the public's fascination with the confluence of consumer behavior and financial phenomena.

Additionally, the researchers delved into television programming that may have indirectly influenced public perceptions related to bottled water consumption and stock market performance. Viewings of financial talk shows, such as "Bull and Bear Beverages" and "Stocks on the Rocks," offered anecdotal exposure to the language and discourse surrounding these interconnected domains, providing a nuanced understanding of the cultural narratives woven into the fabric of financial reporting.

The literature review serves as a compass in navigating the often tumultuous seas of academia, drawing from a diverse range of sources to unravel the mysteries that lie beneath the surface of seemingly incongruous phenomena. As we embark on this unconventional voyage, we merge empirical evidence with the whimsy of fictional narratives and the cultural undercurrents depicted in televised media, guiding our pursuit of knowledge in this delightfully unexpected realm.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US per-person consumption of bottled water and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Ripple Effect: Investigating the Quirky Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and PACCAR Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected nexus between the per-person consumption of bottled water in the United States and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Using comprehensive data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embarked on a statistical exploration to unravel this curious association. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9253920 with a significance level of p < 0.01, spanning the years 2002 to 2022. While this study may seem as refreshing as a cool sip of bottled water on a hot day, the implications and interpretations of this relationship are as complex as the flavors in a gourmet water tasting. Join us as we navigate these uncharted waters, diving deep into the waves of market behavior and consumer preferences to shed light on this captivating, albeit unexpected connection. We invite you to embark on this intellectual endeavor with us, and together, we shall toast to the intriguing interplay of seemingly disparate elements in the financial landscape.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between consumer behavior and stock market performance has long been a subject of intrigue within the realm of financial research. In this paper, we delve into an unlikely pairing - the per-person consumption of bottled water in the United States and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). It's a seemingly peculiar amalgamation, yet our statistical analysis has uncovered a connection as intriguing as a twist of lemon in a refreshing glass of H2O.
Our investigation begins by examining the extensive dataset sourced from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), capturing the consumption patterns of bottled water in the US and the fluctuation of PACCAR's stock price over the period from 2002 to 2022. At first glance, one might assume that these variables are as unrelated as chlorine and a slice of cucumber in a spa water, but our analysis paints a different picture.
During our statistical escapade, we employed rigorous analysis methods and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9253920, leaving us with a degree of connectedness as striking as a perfectly synchronized swimming routine. This correlation was accompanied by a significance level of p < 0.01, illuminating a statistical association that is as robust as a bubbling spring on a sunny day.
While on the surface, one might be parched for a rational explanation for this intriguing linkage, the statistical evidence has quenched our thirst for understanding the intricacies of market behavior and consumer preferences. Yes, the relationship between bottled water consumption and stock prices may sound akin to the refreshing sound of a bottle cap being opened, but the implications and interpretations are as complex as distinguishing between the subtleties of mineral compositions in artisanal waters.
In embarking on this intellectual voyage, we invite you to join us in navigating the currents of market dynamics and the ebb and flow of consumer choices. Together, we embark on an exploration that leaves us with a newfound appreciation for the peculiar and unexpected connections that ripple across the financial landscape. So, grab a glass, raise it to this unconventional intersection, and let's not just dive in but make a splash in decoding this peculiar correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to uncover the quirky relationship between US per-person consumption of bottled water and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR), a comprehensive methodology was employed to ensure the integrity and robustness of our investigation. Data for per-person consumption of bottled water in the United States was gathered from Statista, while PACCAR's stock price data was sourced from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). The period under scrutiny spans from 2002 to 2022, allowing us to encapsulate the changing tide of market and consumer behaviors over two decades.

To quench our thirst for statistical rigor, a series of analyses were performed to tease out the associations between these seemingly disparate variables. The initial steps involved the calculation of descriptive statistics, providing a snapshot of the central tendencies and variability inherent in the data. Much like comparing the characteristics of different water sources, examining the distributional properties of the variables allowed us to gain an understanding of their individual peculiarities.

Following this, a correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the strength and direction of the relationship between US per-person consumption of bottled water and PACCAR's stock price. The bivariate correlation coefficient served as our compass, guiding us through the uncharted waters of seemingly unconnected phenomena. This process was as revealing as deciphering the nuances of a blind water tasting, illuminating the surprising harmony between these distinct elements in the financial ecosystem.

Furthermore, a multivariate regression analysis was carried out, incorporating additional control variables such as economic indicators and market dynamics to account for potential confounding factors. This step was crucial in untangling the web of causality and shedding light on the nuanced interplay of influences that contribute to the observed relationship. As we navigated this intricate statistical model, it became evident that the gravitational pull of these variables on each other was as captivating as the ebb and flow of ocean currents.

In the spirit of scholarly integrity, robustness checks and sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure the stability and consistency of our findings. These exercises acted as a lifebuoy, providing reassurance in the face of fluctuating market conditions and evolving consumer preferences. The rigorous scrutiny of our methodology cast a spotlight on the dependable nature of our statistical conclusions, akin to a beacon shining brightly through the fog of uncertainty.

In summary, our methodology employed a meticulous blend of descriptive, inferential, and multivariate techniques, allowing us to unravel the unexpected connection between US per-person consumption of bottled water and PACCAR's stock price. As we hoist the anchor and set sail on this statistical voyage, our findings stand as a testament to the power and potential of uncovering hidden relationships in the vast sea of data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US per-person consumption of bottled water and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9253920, r-squared of 0.8563503, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Ripple Effect: Investigating the Quirky Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and PACCAR Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected nexus between the per-person consumption of bottled water in the United States and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Using comprehensive data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embarked on a statistical exploration to unravel this curious association. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9253920 with a significance level of p < 0.01, spanning the years 2002 to 2022. While this study may seem as refreshing as a cool sip of bottled water on a hot day, the implications and interpretations of this relationship are as complex as the flavors in a gourmet water tasting. Join us as we navigate these uncharted waters, diving deep into the waves of market behavior and consumer preferences to shed light on this captivating, albeit unexpected connection. We invite you to embark on this intellectual endeavor with us, and together, we shall toast to the intriguing interplay of seemingly disparate elements in the financial landscape.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between consumer behavior and stock market performance has long been a subject of intrigue within the realm of financial research. In this paper, we delve into an unlikely pairing - the per-person consumption of bottled water in the United States and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). It's a seemingly peculiar amalgamation, yet our statistical analysis has uncovered a connection as intriguing as a twist of lemon in a refreshing glass of H2O.
Our investigation begins by examining the extensive dataset sourced from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), capturing the consumption patterns of bottled water in the US and the fluctuation of PACCAR's stock price over the period from 2002 to 2022. At first glance, one might assume that these variables are as unrelated as chlorine and a slice of cucumber in a spa water, but our analysis paints a different picture.
During our statistical escapade, we employed rigorous analysis methods and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9253920, leaving us with a degree of connectedness as striking as a perfectly synchronized swimming routine. This correlation was accompanied by a significance level of p < 0.01, illuminating a statistical association that is as robust as a bubbling spring on a sunny day.
While on the surface, one might be parched for a rational explanation for this intriguing linkage, the statistical evidence has quenched our thirst for understanding the intricacies of market behavior and consumer preferences. Yes, the relationship between bottled water consumption and stock prices may sound akin to the refreshing sound of a bottle cap being opened, but the implications and interpretations are as complex as distinguishing between the subtleties of mineral compositions in artisanal waters.
In embarking on this intellectual voyage, we invite you to join us in navigating the currents of market dynamics and the ebb and flow of consumer choices. Together, we embark on an exploration that leaves us with a newfound appreciation for the peculiar and unexpected connections that ripple across the financial landscape. So, grab a glass, raise it to this unconventional intersection, and let's not just dive in but make a splash in decoding this peculiar correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between US per-person consumption of bottled water and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR) from 2002 to 2022 has yielded some intriguing findings, much like stumbling upon an oasis in the desert of financial research. Our correlation analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9253920, suggesting a connection as refreshing as a mint-infused water served at a spa. This substantial correlation was further substantiated by an r-squared of 0.8563503, implying that a noteworthy 85.64% of the variance in PACCAR's stock price can be attributed to the per-person consumption of bottled water in the US. The significance level of p < 0.01 adds further sparkle to these results, indicating a statistical association as clear and unmistakable as a pristine mountain spring.

Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating this robust relationship, where the data points align as harmoniously as a synchronized swimming routine, painting a vivid picture of the connection between these seemingly disparate variables. The linear association between US bottled water consumption and PACCAR's stock price is as compelling as the ebb and flow of market trends, highlighting a connection that transcends the boundaries of traditional financial analyses.

These findings invite us to ponder the nuanced interplay between consumer behavior and market dynamics. While at first glance this connection may seem as unlikely as finding a watermelon in a water cooler, our analysis has unveiled a captivating relationship that shines a spotlight on the multifaceted nature of financial markets. As we raise a figurative toast to these unexpected findings, we recognize the importance of exploring unconventional connections that ripple through the intricate tapestry of market forces.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US per-person consumption of bottled water and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Ripple Effect: Investigating the Quirky Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and PACCAR Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected nexus between the per-person consumption of bottled water in the United States and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Using comprehensive data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embarked on a statistical exploration to unravel this curious association. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9253920 with a significance level of p < 0.01, spanning the years 2002 to 2022. While this study may seem as refreshing as a cool sip of bottled water on a hot day, the implications and interpretations of this relationship are as complex as the flavors in a gourmet water tasting. Join us as we navigate these uncharted waters, diving deep into the waves of market behavior and consumer preferences to shed light on this captivating, albeit unexpected connection. We invite you to embark on this intellectual endeavor with us, and together, we shall toast to the intriguing interplay of seemingly disparate elements in the financial landscape.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The intersection of consumer habits and stock market trends has long piqued the curiosity of researchers seeking to unravel the enigmatic dance between seemingly unrelated variables. Smith et al. (2010) were among the pioneers in this field, exploring the interconnectedness of consumer beverage choices and market fluctuations. Their study, "Bottled Beverages and the Bottom Line: A Quenching Quest into Market Quirks," laid the groundwork for investigations into the whimsical ways in which consumer behavior can intersect with financial indices.
While Smith et al.'s work provided valuable insights, it is important to consider the broader context of consumer preferences and economic indicators. The study by Doe and Jones (2015), "Thirsty for Returns: A Hydration-Based Analysis of Stock Performance," introduced an innovative approach to understanding the relationship between beverage consumption and market dynamics. Their findings suggested a potential correlation between the consumption of liquid assets, both in the form of bottled beverages and stock holdings.
As the exploration of this unconventional correlation unfolds, it is crucial to draw from a diverse array of sources to shed light on the multifaceted nature of this relationship. Works such as "Liquid Assets: An Economic Analysis of Beverage Trends" by Waterman (2018) and "Stocks and Sips: A Thirst-Quenching Approach to Market Analysis" by Beverage (2017) offer valuable insights into the intersection of consumer habits and financial markets.
In expanding the scope of inquiry, it is pertinent to consider fictional literature that may offer unexpected parallels to the topic at hand. The whimsical narratives of "The Thirsty Investor" by A. Quencher and "Bubbles and Bull Markets" by F. Izzy provide fictionalized accounts of the entwined nature of beverage choices and market speculation. While these works may not offer empirical evidence, they contribute to a broader understanding of the public's fascination with the confluence of consumer behavior and financial phenomena.
Additionally, the researchers delved into television programming that may have indirectly influenced public perceptions related to bottled water consumption and stock market performance. Viewings of financial talk shows, such as "Bull and Bear Beverages" and "Stocks on the Rocks," offered anecdotal exposure to the language and discourse surrounding these interconnected domains, providing a nuanced understanding of the cultural narratives woven into the fabric of financial reporting.
The literature review serves as a compass in navigating the often tumultuous seas of academia, drawing from a diverse range of sources to unravel the mysteries that lie beneath the surface of seemingly incongruous phenomena. As we embark on this unconventional voyage, we merge empirical evidence with the whimsy of fictional narratives and the cultural undercurrents depicted in televised media, guiding our pursuit of knowledge in this delightfully unexpected realm.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between US per-person consumption of bottled water and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR) from 2002 to 2022 has yielded some intriguing findings, much like stumbling upon an oasis in the desert of financial research. Our correlation analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9253920, suggesting a connection as refreshing as a mint-infused water served at a spa. This substantial correlation was further substantiated by an r-squared of 0.8563503, implying that a noteworthy 85.64% of the variance in PACCAR's stock price can be attributed to the per-person consumption of bottled water in the US. The significance level of p < 0.01 adds further sparkle to these results, indicating a statistical association as clear and unmistakable as a pristine mountain spring.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating this robust relationship, where the data points align as harmoniously as a synchronized swimming routine, painting a vivid picture of the connection between these seemingly disparate variables. The linear association between US bottled water consumption and PACCAR's stock price is as compelling as the ebb and flow of market trends, highlighting a connection that transcends the boundaries of traditional financial analyses.
These findings invite us to ponder the nuanced interplay between consumer behavior and market dynamics. While at first glance this connection may seem as unlikely as finding a watermelon in a water cooler, our analysis has unveiled a captivating relationship that shines a spotlight on the multifaceted nature of financial markets. As we raise a figurative toast to these unexpected findings, we recognize the importance of exploring unconventional connections that ripple through the intricate tapestry of market forces.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our results have buoyed the existing body of research, serving as a refreshing splash of insight into the unexplored waters of beverage consumption and stock market performance. The robust correlation we uncovered between US per-person consumption of bottled water and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR) aligns harmoniously with the earlier work of Smith et al. (2010) and Doe and Jones (2015). It seems our findings have lent further weight to the notion that consumer beverage choices can indeed sway the tides of market fluctuations, much like a drop of lemon in a glass of still water.

While the connection between bottled water consumption and stock prices may seem as unlikely as stumbling upon a treasure map at the bottom of a well, our analysis reveals a clear and unmistakable association. Our results, akin to a well-timed rain shower in the desert of financial research, hint at a substantial 85.64% of the variance in PACCAR's stock price being linked to the per-person consumption of bottled water in the US. It is as if the market trends and consumer preferences have engaged in a dance as elegant and synchronized as a high-stakes ballet performance.

The scatterplot depicting this relationship paints a vivid picture that is as clear as a pristine mountain spring. The linear association we observed is as compelling as a well-crafted theory, illuminating the intricate interplay between consumer behavior and financial phenomena. This finding invites us to indulge in the whimsical notion that the ebb and flow of market dynamics may, in fact, reflect the ebb and flow of beverage choices, as delightful and surprising as a sudden burst of fizz from a shaken soda can.

As we raise a figurative toast to these unexpected findings, we recognize the importance of embracing unconventional connections that, much like the bubbles in a carbonated drink, effervesce through the intricate web of market forces. Our research serves as a reminder that the seemingly unrelated can intertwine in the most unexpected ways, much like the threads of a grand tapestry woven by the hand of statistical fate.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US per-person consumption of bottled water and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Ripple Effect: Investigating the Quirky Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and PACCAR Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected nexus between the per-person consumption of bottled water in the United States and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Using comprehensive data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embarked on a statistical exploration to unravel this curious association. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9253920 with a significance level of p < 0.01, spanning the years 2002 to 2022. While this study may seem as refreshing as a cool sip of bottled water on a hot day, the implications and interpretations of this relationship are as complex as the flavors in a gourmet water tasting. Join us as we navigate these uncharted waters, diving deep into the waves of market behavior and consumer preferences to shed light on this captivating, albeit unexpected connection. We invite you to embark on this intellectual endeavor with us, and together, we shall toast to the intriguing interplay of seemingly disparate elements in the financial landscape.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between consumer behavior and stock market performance has long been a subject of intrigue within the realm of financial research. In this paper, we delve into an unlikely pairing - the per-person consumption of bottled water in the United States and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). It's a seemingly peculiar amalgamation, yet our statistical analysis has uncovered a connection as intriguing as a twist of lemon in a refreshing glass of H2O.
Our investigation begins by examining the extensive dataset sourced from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), capturing the consumption patterns of bottled water in the US and the fluctuation of PACCAR's stock price over the period from 2002 to 2022. At first glance, one might assume that these variables are as unrelated as chlorine and a slice of cucumber in a spa water, but our analysis paints a different picture.
During our statistical escapade, we employed rigorous analysis methods and uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9253920, leaving us with a degree of connectedness as striking as a perfectly synchronized swimming routine. This correlation was accompanied by a significance level of p < 0.01, illuminating a statistical association that is as robust as a bubbling spring on a sunny day.
While on the surface, one might be parched for a rational explanation for this intriguing linkage, the statistical evidence has quenched our thirst for understanding the intricacies of market behavior and consumer preferences. Yes, the relationship between bottled water consumption and stock prices may sound akin to the refreshing sound of a bottle cap being opened, but the implications and interpretations are as complex as distinguishing between the subtleties of mineral compositions in artisanal waters.
In embarking on this intellectual voyage, we invite you to join us in navigating the currents of market dynamics and the ebb and flow of consumer choices. Together, we embark on an exploration that leaves us with a newfound appreciation for the peculiar and unexpected connections that ripple across the financial landscape. So, grab a glass, raise it to this unconventional intersection, and let's not just dive in but make a splash in decoding this peculiar correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between US per-person consumption of bottled water and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR) from 2002 to 2022 has yielded some intriguing findings, much like stumbling upon an oasis in the desert of financial research. Our correlation analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9253920, suggesting a connection as refreshing as a mint-infused water served at a spa. This substantial correlation was further substantiated by an r-squared of 0.8563503, implying that a noteworthy 85.64% of the variance in PACCAR's stock price can be attributed to the per-person consumption of bottled water in the US. The significance level of p < 0.01 adds further sparkle to these results, indicating a statistical association as clear and unmistakable as a pristine mountain spring.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating this robust relationship, where the data points align as harmoniously as a synchronized swimming routine, painting a vivid picture of the connection between these seemingly disparate variables. The linear association between US bottled water consumption and PACCAR's stock price is as compelling as the ebb and flow of market trends, highlighting a connection that transcends the boundaries of traditional financial analyses.
These findings invite us to ponder the nuanced interplay between consumer behavior and market dynamics. While at first glance this connection may seem as unlikely as finding a watermelon in a water cooler, our analysis has unveiled a captivating relationship that shines a spotlight on the multifaceted nature of financial markets. As we raise a figurative toast to these unexpected findings, we recognize the importance of exploring unconventional connections that ripple through the intricate tapestry of market forces.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the quirky relationship between US per-person consumption of bottled water and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR) has revealed a correlation as refreshing as a sip of artisanal water on a hot summer's day. The remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9253920 and the substantial r-squared of 0.8563503 highlight a connection as clear and unmistakable as a pristine mountain spring, providing a statistical association as robust as a bubbling spring on a sunny day.

The implications of these findings are as complex as distinguishing between the subtleties of mineral compositions in artisanal waters, offering a profound insight into the intersection of market behavior and consumer preferences. While one might initially be parched for a rational explanation for this unexpected linkage, our statistical escapade has quenched our thirst for understanding the peculiarities of market dynamics.

As we raise a figurative toast to these unexpected results, it is clear that further research in this area is as unnecessary as a fish riding a bicycle. The compelling nature of this relationship leaves us with no thirst for additional investigations. Instead, we invite researchers to turn their attention to less hydrated endeavors and leave this particular ripple in the financial landscape undisturbed. Cheers to the intriguing complexities of statistical serendipity!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Ripple Effect: Investigating the Quirky Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and PACCAR Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Economic Relationships


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Ripple Effect: Investigating the Quirky Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and PACCAR Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Hydration Economics and Market Dynamics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Ripple Effect: Investigating the Quirky Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and PACCAR Stock Price with an abstract of This paper delves into the unexpected nexus between the per-person consumption of bottled water in the United States and PACCAR's stock price (PCAR). Using comprehensive data from Statista and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we embarked on a statistical exploration to unravel this curious association. Our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9253920 with a significance level of p < 0.01, spanning the years 2002 to 2022. While this study may seem as refreshing as a cool sip of bottled water on a hot day, the implications and interpretations of this relationship are as complex as the flavors in a gourmet water tasting. Join us as we navigate these uncharted waters, diving deep into the waves of market behavior and consumer preferences to shed light on this captivating, albeit unexpected connection. We invite you to embark on this intellectual endeavor with us, and together, we shall toast to the intriguing interplay of seemingly disparate elements in the financial landscape.

ChatGPT:

bottled water consumption US, PACCAR stock price, correlation coefficient, statistical exploration, consumer preferences, market behavior, financial landscape, nexus, significance level, relationship analysis, stock market correlation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

US per-person consumption of bottled water
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with US per-person consumption of bottled water

PACCAR's stock price (PCAR)
Detailed data title: Opening price of PACCAR (PCAR) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with PACCAR's stock price (PCAR)

Correlation r = 0.9253920 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8563503 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., PACCAR's stock price (PCAR)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., US per-person consumption of bottled water) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.9E-9. 0.0000000019121095108295166000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 1.9E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 522,982,598 random variables You don't actually need 522 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.82, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
US per-person consumption of bottled water (Gallons)20.121.623.225.427.62928.527.628.328.730.431.633.635.938.540.642.343.745.24746.5
PACCAR's stock price (PCAR) (Stock price)7.938.3615.3721.9418.9226.6833.1417.522.6335.523.5928.2736.6243.0330.2142.3648.3837.5152.7957.7458.84




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([20.1,21.6,23.2,25.4,27.6,29,28.5,27.6,28.3,28.7,30.4,31.6,33.6,35.9,38.5,40.6,42.3,43.7,45.2,47,46.5,])
array_2 = np.array([7.93,8.36,15.37,21.94,18.92,26.68,33.14,17.5,22.63,35.5,23.59,28.27,36.62,43.03,30.21,42.36,48.38,37.51,52.79,57.74,58.84,])
array_1_name = "US per-person consumption of bottled water"
array_2_name = "PACCAR's stock price (PCAR)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 2104 · Black Variable ID: 442 · Red Variable ID: 1756
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0