about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,038 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and the second variable is The divorce rate in Arkansas.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As cotton fields became a little less genetically modified, the love bug began to bite a little harder. It seems the key to marital bliss was to let nature take its course, rather than meddling with genetically modified relationships.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that combines the aesthetics of a classic Discovery magazine cover with a surreal scene set in a cotton field in Arkansas. The focal point should be a farmer standing proudly next to a genetically modified cotton plant, which is depicted as healthy and thriving. In the background, two people are seen signing divorce papers under a tree, surrounded by the scenic cotton fields. The image should have a clear composition and showcase the contrast between the natural beauty of the cotton fields and the human drama unfolding in the background. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and The divorce rate in Arkansas. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie High-tech A Discovery magazine cover image A scene from Skyrim Pop art
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and The divorce rate in Arkansas together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cotton field in Arkansas, a farmer is standing next to a genetically modified cotton plant that is growing tall and healthy. In the background, two people are seen signing divorce papers under a tree, surrounded by fields of cotton plants.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a cotton field in Arkansas, a farmer is standing next to a genetically modified cotton plant that is growing tall and healthy. In the background, two people are seen signing divorce papers under a tree, surrounded by fields of cotton plants. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that combines the aesthetics of a classic Discovery magazine cover with a surreal scene set in a cotton field in Arkansas. The focal point should be a farmer standing proudly next to a genetically modified cotton plant, which is depicted as healthy and thriving. In the background, two people are seen signing divorce papers under a tree, surrounded by the scenic cotton fields. The image should have a clear composition and showcase the contrast between the natural beauty of the cotton fields and the human drama unfolding in the background.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in cotton in Arkansas caused The divorce rate in Arkansas to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Spinning Tales: The Genetic Modification of Cotton and the Unraveling of Marriages in Arkansas

The Journal of Agricultural Genetics and Sociological Quandaries

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and The divorce rate in Arkansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and CDC National Vital Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8179777 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Spinning Tales: The Genetic Modification of Cotton and the Unraveling of Marriages in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the potential link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Our research team utilized data from the USDA and CDC National Vital Statistics to conduct a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2000 to 2021. While the notion of GMOs in cotton leading to marital discontent may seem like a baleful yarn, our findings reveal a surprising correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8179777 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, our results suggest a strong association between GMO use in cotton production and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Our findings knit together a compelling argument for further investigation into the unforeseen impact of genetic modifications on societal dynamics. This study sheds light on the intertwined complexities of agricultural practices and human relationships, illustrating the need for interdisciplinary approaches in research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and The divorce rate in Arkansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spinning Tales: The Genetic Modification of Cotton and the Unraveling of Marriages in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the potential link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Our research team utilized data from the USDA and CDC National Vital Statistics to conduct a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2000 to 2021. While the notion of GMOs in cotton leading to marital discontent may seem like a baleful yarn, our findings reveal a surprising correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8179777 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, our results suggest a strong association between GMO use in cotton production and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Our findings knit together a compelling argument for further investigation into the unforeseen impact of genetic modifications on societal dynamics. This study sheds light on the intertwined complexities of agricultural practices and human relationships, illustrating the need for interdisciplinary approaches in research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Greetings, esteemed colleagues and curious readers! As we embark on this intellectual journey into the world of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the tangled web of marital relationships, we find ourselves unraveling a thread of inquiry that may, at first glance, seem more suited to a cotton-candy-fueled nightmare than a scholarly investigation. Yes, we are delving into the strange and unexpected correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton farming and the divorce rate in the beautiful state of Arkansas. Why, you ask? Well, let's just say we were cotton' onto something interesting, and we couldn't help but spin this yarn of research.

We live in a world where GMOs are not just the stuff of science fiction and fantasy. These genetically engineered organisms have become integral to modern agriculture, revolutionizing crop production, and inspiring heated debates at dinner tables and academic symposiums alike. Now, throw in the complex and delicate ecosystem of human relationships, and we have ourselves a cocktail of intrigue and bewilderment.

In the words of Garrison Keillor, "I believe that the cotton gin is up there as one of the great inventions, and E=mc^2 is in a way a variation of the cotton gin." Well, we might not be tapping into the mysteries of the cosmos, but we are certainly delving into the intricacies of the cotton field, and perhaps, the heart-wrenching complications of human bonds.

So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts, for we are about to take this academic journey through the rolling hills of genetically modified cotton fields and the tumultuous terrain of modern relationships. Let's pique your curiosity and unravel the mystery behind the unexpected connection between GMO cotton and the divorce rate in the Natural State.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and The divorce rate in Arkansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spinning Tales: The Genetic Modification of Cotton and the Unraveling of Marriages in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the potential link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Our research team utilized data from the USDA and CDC National Vital Statistics to conduct a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2000 to 2021. While the notion of GMOs in cotton leading to marital discontent may seem like a baleful yarn, our findings reveal a surprising correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8179777 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, our results suggest a strong association between GMO use in cotton production and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Our findings knit together a compelling argument for further investigation into the unforeseen impact of genetic modifications on societal dynamics. This study sheds light on the intertwined complexities of agricultural practices and human relationships, illustrating the need for interdisciplinary approaches in research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Greetings, esteemed colleagues and curious readers! As we embark on this intellectual journey into the world of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the tangled web of marital relationships, we find ourselves unraveling a thread of inquiry that may, at first glance, seem more suited to a cotton-candy-fueled nightmare than a scholarly investigation. Yes, we are delving into the strange and unexpected correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton farming and the divorce rate in the beautiful state of Arkansas. Why, you ask? Well, let's just say we were cotton' onto something interesting, and we couldn't help but spin this yarn of research.
We live in a world where GMOs are not just the stuff of science fiction and fantasy. These genetically engineered organisms have become integral to modern agriculture, revolutionizing crop production, and inspiring heated debates at dinner tables and academic symposiums alike. Now, throw in the complex and delicate ecosystem of human relationships, and we have ourselves a cocktail of intrigue and bewilderment.
In the words of Garrison Keillor, "I believe that the cotton gin is up there as one of the great inventions, and E=mc^2 is in a way a variation of the cotton gin." Well, we might not be tapping into the mysteries of the cosmos, but we are certainly delving into the intricacies of the cotton field, and perhaps, the heart-wrenching complications of human bonds.
So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts, for we are about to take this academic journey through the rolling hills of genetically modified cotton fields and the tumultuous terrain of modern relationships. Let's pique your curiosity and unravel the mystery behind the unexpected connection between GMO cotton and the divorce rate in the Natural State.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To understand the curious correlation between GMO use in cotton farming and the divorce rate in Arkansas, we must first delve into the existing literature on genetically modified organisms, cotton production, and the dynamics of marital relationships. Smith, in "GMOs and Agricultural Practices," provides a comprehensive analysis of the impact of genetic modifications on crop yield and resilience, shedding light on the potential implications for the agricultural landscape. Meanwhile, Doe, in "Cotton Farming in the 21st Century," examines the technological advancements in cotton production, including the widespread adoption of GMO varieties, and their effects on the economy and environment.

Jones, in "Marriages and Society," offers a sociological perspective on the factors influencing marital stability, delving into the intricacies of interpersonal relationships in the modern era. However, as we venture further into the literature, we start to unravel some unexpected sources that provide intriguing insights into the intersection of cotton, genetics, and marital discord. "The Cotton Chronicles" by Laura Fiber, while not a scholarly work per se, weaves a tale of love and loss against the backdrop of a cotton plantation, offering a poignant narrative that resonates with the complexities of rural life.

On the fictional front, "Ginning Up Trouble" by Agatha Threadwell presents a compelling mystery set in a cotton farming community, where secrets unravel like bolls of cotton in a whirlwind. Moving into the realm of cinema, "Cotton Confidential" is a documentary that uncovers the hidden realities of cotton production, unearthing the enigmatic world of genetically modified cotton and its unforeseen consequences.

As we stitch together this patchwork of literature, it becomes evident that the connection between GMO cotton and the divorce rate in Arkansas is a tapestry of intrigue and unexpected twists. While the initial premise may have seemed like a whimsical hypothesis, the evidence at hand suggests a need for further exploration into the interplay of agricultural practices and societal dynamics in the context of modern relationships.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and The divorce rate in Arkansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and CDC National Vital Statistics . You used data from 2000 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spinning Tales: The Genetic Modification of Cotton and the Unraveling of Marriages in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the potential link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Our research team utilized data from the USDA and CDC National Vital Statistics to conduct a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2000 to 2021. While the notion of GMOs in cotton leading to marital discontent may seem like a baleful yarn, our findings reveal a surprising correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8179777 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, our results suggest a strong association between GMO use in cotton production and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Our findings knit together a compelling argument for further investigation into the unforeseen impact of genetic modifications on societal dynamics. This study sheds light on the intertwined complexities of agricultural practices and human relationships, illustrating the need for interdisciplinary approaches in research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Greetings, esteemed colleagues and curious readers! As we embark on this intellectual journey into the world of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the tangled web of marital relationships, we find ourselves unraveling a thread of inquiry that may, at first glance, seem more suited to a cotton-candy-fueled nightmare than a scholarly investigation. Yes, we are delving into the strange and unexpected correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton farming and the divorce rate in the beautiful state of Arkansas. Why, you ask? Well, let's just say we were cotton' onto something interesting, and we couldn't help but spin this yarn of research.
We live in a world where GMOs are not just the stuff of science fiction and fantasy. These genetically engineered organisms have become integral to modern agriculture, revolutionizing crop production, and inspiring heated debates at dinner tables and academic symposiums alike. Now, throw in the complex and delicate ecosystem of human relationships, and we have ourselves a cocktail of intrigue and bewilderment.
In the words of Garrison Keillor, "I believe that the cotton gin is up there as one of the great inventions, and E=mc^2 is in a way a variation of the cotton gin." Well, we might not be tapping into the mysteries of the cosmos, but we are certainly delving into the intricacies of the cotton field, and perhaps, the heart-wrenching complications of human bonds.
So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts, for we are about to take this academic journey through the rolling hills of genetically modified cotton fields and the tumultuous terrain of modern relationships. Let's pique your curiosity and unravel the mystery behind the unexpected connection between GMO cotton and the divorce rate in the Natural State.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic connection between genetically modified cotton and divorce rates, our research team employed a multi-faceted approach with a dash of whimsy and a sprinkle of scientific rigor. Our methodology entailed the amalgamation of disparate data sources, providing a delightful patchwork quilt of information that we meticulously sewed together into a cohesive analytical framework.

First and foremost, we engaged in a veritable digital treasure hunt across the vast expanse of the internet, scouring websites, databases, and digital repositories in search of relevant data. Our virtual sleuthing led us to the hallowed halls of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Vital Statistics, where we unearthed a wealth of information spanning the years 2000 to 2021.

With our virtual cart brimming with datasets, we meticulously groomed and pruned the information, ensuring that the statistical flora of our study was free from weeds of uncertainty. Upon assembling the datasets, we applied a series of statistical analyses, embracing regression models and correlation coefficients with the zeal of a modern-day alchemist on a quest for empirical gold.

In our statistical brew, we conjured the enchanting correlation coefficient, teasing out the flirtations between GMO cotton use and the divorce rate in Arkansas. We also subjected our findings to the stern scrutiny of p-values, ensuring that our results were not merely products of happenstance, but rather the genuine fruits of scholarly inquiry. Our aim was to provide not just a tapestry of numbers, but a colorful and nuanced portrait of the intertwining threads of cotton farming and matrimonial woes.

Furthermore, we employed a comparative analysis, contrasting the divorce rates in Arkansas with cotton-growing states where GMO usage differed, such as the denim-donning fields of California and the bountiful plains of Texas. This comparative approach allowed us to discern patterns and peculiarities, akin to sleuths unraveling the intertwined plotlines of a perplexing mystery novel.

In summary, our methodological concoction merged the art of digital exploration with the science of statistical inquiry, creating a palatable blend of empirical evidence and intellectual curiosity. With a twinkle in our eye and a hearty dose of academic tenacity, we ventured forth into the uncharted territory of GMO cotton and divorce rates, eager to uncover the unexpected connections hidden within these agrarian and amorous landscapes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and The divorce rate in Arkansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and CDC National Vital Statistics .

For the time period 2000 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8179777, r-squared of 0.6690875, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spinning Tales: The Genetic Modification of Cotton and the Unraveling of Marriages in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the potential link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Our research team utilized data from the USDA and CDC National Vital Statistics to conduct a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2000 to 2021. While the notion of GMOs in cotton leading to marital discontent may seem like a baleful yarn, our findings reveal a surprising correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8179777 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, our results suggest a strong association between GMO use in cotton production and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Our findings knit together a compelling argument for further investigation into the unforeseen impact of genetic modifications on societal dynamics. This study sheds light on the intertwined complexities of agricultural practices and human relationships, illustrating the need for interdisciplinary approaches in research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Greetings, esteemed colleagues and curious readers! As we embark on this intellectual journey into the world of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the tangled web of marital relationships, we find ourselves unraveling a thread of inquiry that may, at first glance, seem more suited to a cotton-candy-fueled nightmare than a scholarly investigation. Yes, we are delving into the strange and unexpected correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton farming and the divorce rate in the beautiful state of Arkansas. Why, you ask? Well, let's just say we were cotton' onto something interesting, and we couldn't help but spin this yarn of research.
We live in a world where GMOs are not just the stuff of science fiction and fantasy. These genetically engineered organisms have become integral to modern agriculture, revolutionizing crop production, and inspiring heated debates at dinner tables and academic symposiums alike. Now, throw in the complex and delicate ecosystem of human relationships, and we have ourselves a cocktail of intrigue and bewilderment.
In the words of Garrison Keillor, "I believe that the cotton gin is up there as one of the great inventions, and E=mc^2 is in a way a variation of the cotton gin." Well, we might not be tapping into the mysteries of the cosmos, but we are certainly delving into the intricacies of the cotton field, and perhaps, the heart-wrenching complications of human bonds.
So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts, for we are about to take this academic journey through the rolling hills of genetically modified cotton fields and the tumultuous terrain of modern relationships. Let's pique your curiosity and unravel the mystery behind the unexpected connection between GMO cotton and the divorce rate in the Natural State.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our study revealed an astonishing correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Despite the initial skepticism surrounding this unlikely pairing, the data spoke for itself. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8179777 and an r-squared value of 0.6690875, the relationship between these variables was stronger than a double-stitched seam on a pair of denim overalls.

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot showcasing the robust connection between the adoption of GMOs in cotton cultivation and the dissolution of marriages in the state of Arkansas. The points on the scatterplot resemble a constellation of woes, with each data point telling a poignant tale of agricultural innovation intertwining with personal strife.

The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence that the observed relationship was not just a mere fluke or a whimsical happenstance. As surprising as it may seem, it appears that the adoption of GMOs in cotton production may have unintended, far-reaching implications on the fabric of society (pun intended).

This unexpected correlation challenges us to unravel the underlying mechanisms at play. Is it possible that the introduction of genetically modified cotton seeds has sown seeds of discontent in more ways than one? Could there be a biological, psychological, or even socio-economic explanation for this peculiar association? These questions, while amusing to ponder, demand rigorous investigation to comprehend the intricate dynamics at play.

In summary, our findings underscore the need for a nuanced understanding of the interplay between agricultural advancements and societal dynamics. The deep-rooted impact of GMOs in cotton farming on the divorce rate in Arkansas, as advocated by our study, calls for continued exploration and collaborative efforts across various disciplines. It is clear that the patchwork of human experiences and agricultural innovations may be more tightly interwoven than we ever imagined, and there is much yet to be discovered in this curious landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and The divorce rate in Arkansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Spinning Tales: The Genetic Modification of Cotton and the Unraveling of Marriages in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the potential link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Our research team utilized data from the USDA and CDC National Vital Statistics to conduct a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2000 to 2021. While the notion of GMOs in cotton leading to marital discontent may seem like a baleful yarn, our findings reveal a surprising correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8179777 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, our results suggest a strong association between GMO use in cotton production and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Our findings knit together a compelling argument for further investigation into the unforeseen impact of genetic modifications on societal dynamics. This study sheds light on the intertwined complexities of agricultural practices and human relationships, illustrating the need for interdisciplinary approaches in research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To understand the curious correlation between GMO use in cotton farming and the divorce rate in Arkansas, we must first delve into the existing literature on genetically modified organisms, cotton production, and the dynamics of marital relationships. Smith, in "GMOs and Agricultural Practices," provides a comprehensive analysis of the impact of genetic modifications on crop yield and resilience, shedding light on the potential implications for the agricultural landscape. Meanwhile, Doe, in "Cotton Farming in the 21st Century," examines the technological advancements in cotton production, including the widespread adoption of GMO varieties, and their effects on the economy and environment.
Jones, in "Marriages and Society," offers a sociological perspective on the factors influencing marital stability, delving into the intricacies of interpersonal relationships in the modern era. However, as we venture further into the literature, we start to unravel some unexpected sources that provide intriguing insights into the intersection of cotton, genetics, and marital discord. "The Cotton Chronicles" by Laura Fiber, while not a scholarly work per se, weaves a tale of love and loss against the backdrop of a cotton plantation, offering a poignant narrative that resonates with the complexities of rural life.
On the fictional front, "Ginning Up Trouble" by Agatha Threadwell presents a compelling mystery set in a cotton farming community, where secrets unravel like bolls of cotton in a whirlwind. Moving into the realm of cinema, "Cotton Confidential" is a documentary that uncovers the hidden realities of cotton production, unearthing the enigmatic world of genetically modified cotton and its unforeseen consequences.
As we stitch together this patchwork of literature, it becomes evident that the connection between GMO cotton and the divorce rate in Arkansas is a tapestry of intrigue and unexpected twists. While the initial premise may have seemed like a whimsical hypothesis, the evidence at hand suggests a need for further exploration into the interplay of agricultural practices and societal dynamics in the context of modern relationships.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study revealed an astonishing correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Despite the initial skepticism surrounding this unlikely pairing, the data spoke for itself. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8179777 and an r-squared value of 0.6690875, the relationship between these variables was stronger than a double-stitched seam on a pair of denim overalls.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot showcasing the robust connection between the adoption of GMOs in cotton cultivation and the dissolution of marriages in the state of Arkansas. The points on the scatterplot resemble a constellation of woes, with each data point telling a poignant tale of agricultural innovation intertwining with personal strife.
The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence that the observed relationship was not just a mere fluke or a whimsical happenstance. As surprising as it may seem, it appears that the adoption of GMOs in cotton production may have unintended, far-reaching implications on the fabric of society (pun intended).
This unexpected correlation challenges us to unravel the underlying mechanisms at play. Is it possible that the introduction of genetically modified cotton seeds has sown seeds of discontent in more ways than one? Could there be a biological, psychological, or even socio-economic explanation for this peculiar association? These questions, while amusing to ponder, demand rigorous investigation to comprehend the intricate dynamics at play.
In summary, our findings underscore the need for a nuanced understanding of the interplay between agricultural advancements and societal dynamics. The deep-rooted impact of GMOs in cotton farming on the divorce rate in Arkansas, as advocated by our study, calls for continued exploration and collaborative efforts across various disciplines. It is clear that the patchwork of human experiences and agricultural innovations may be more tightly interwoven than we ever imagined, and there is much yet to be discovered in this curious landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming and the divorce rate in Arkansas has spun a web of intrigue, leaving us pondering the intricate threads that intertwine agricultural practices and human relationships. Our findings, while seemingly a whimsical tale at first glance, lend support to the prior research that hinted at the potential impacts of genetically modified cotton on the fabric of society.

Smith's comprehensive analysis of GMOs in agricultural practices laid the groundwork for understanding the potential implications of genetic modifications on crop yield and resilience. Our results provide a striking revelation that supports the notion that these implications may extend beyond the fields and into the realm of human affairs. As the yarn of our investigation unravels, it becomes evident that the impact of genetic modifications on cotton production may have unforeseen consequences that extend into the fabric of society.

Doe's exploration of technological advancements in cotton farming, including the widespread adoption of GMO varieties, aligns with our findings, weaving a narrative of innovation and transformation that reaches beyond the domain of agriculture. The correlation we observed between the use of GMOs in cotton farming and the divorce rate in Arkansas goes to show that the ripple effects of technological progress may reach unexpected shores, leaving behind a tapestry of societal changes that merit deeper exploration.

Furthermore, our study resonates with the insights provided by the unconventional sources in our literature review, including Laura Fiber's heartfelt narrative and Agatha Threadwell's intriguing mystery. The unexpected yet tangible association between GMO use in cotton farming and marital discord reflects the complex realities of rural life and human interactions, challenging us to explore the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate domains.

In conclusion, our findings, supported by the whimsical sources and serious scholarly work alike, call for a reimagining of the relationship between agricultural innovations and societal dynamics. The implications of genetically modified cotton on the divorce rate in Arkansas may be more profound than mere happenstance, and the time has come to embark on a new chapter of research that delves into the intricacies of this unlikely association. As we unravel the tangled web of genetic modifications and human relationships, it is clear that there is much to be learned and discovered in this curious landscape where agricultural advancements and societal fabric intersect.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Arkansas and The divorce rate in Arkansas. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Spinning Tales: The Genetic Modification of Cotton and the Unraveling of Marriages in Arkansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the potential link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Our research team utilized data from the USDA and CDC National Vital Statistics to conduct a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2000 to 2021. While the notion of GMOs in cotton leading to marital discontent may seem like a baleful yarn, our findings reveal a surprising correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8179777 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, our results suggest a strong association between GMO use in cotton production and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Our findings knit together a compelling argument for further investigation into the unforeseen impact of genetic modifications on societal dynamics. This study sheds light on the intertwined complexities of agricultural practices and human relationships, illustrating the need for interdisciplinary approaches in research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Greetings, esteemed colleagues and curious readers! As we embark on this intellectual journey into the world of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and the tangled web of marital relationships, we find ourselves unraveling a thread of inquiry that may, at first glance, seem more suited to a cotton-candy-fueled nightmare than a scholarly investigation. Yes, we are delving into the strange and unexpected correlation between the use of GMOs in cotton farming and the divorce rate in the beautiful state of Arkansas. Why, you ask? Well, let's just say we were cotton' onto something interesting, and we couldn't help but spin this yarn of research.
We live in a world where GMOs are not just the stuff of science fiction and fantasy. These genetically engineered organisms have become integral to modern agriculture, revolutionizing crop production, and inspiring heated debates at dinner tables and academic symposiums alike. Now, throw in the complex and delicate ecosystem of human relationships, and we have ourselves a cocktail of intrigue and bewilderment.
In the words of Garrison Keillor, "I believe that the cotton gin is up there as one of the great inventions, and E=mc^2 is in a way a variation of the cotton gin." Well, we might not be tapping into the mysteries of the cosmos, but we are certainly delving into the intricacies of the cotton field, and perhaps, the heart-wrenching complications of human bonds.
So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts, for we are about to take this academic journey through the rolling hills of genetically modified cotton fields and the tumultuous terrain of modern relationships. Let's pique your curiosity and unravel the mystery behind the unexpected connection between GMO cotton and the divorce rate in the Natural State.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study revealed an astonishing correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Despite the initial skepticism surrounding this unlikely pairing, the data spoke for itself. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8179777 and an r-squared value of 0.6690875, the relationship between these variables was stronger than a double-stitched seam on a pair of denim overalls.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot showcasing the robust connection between the adoption of GMOs in cotton cultivation and the dissolution of marriages in the state of Arkansas. The points on the scatterplot resemble a constellation of woes, with each data point telling a poignant tale of agricultural innovation intertwining with personal strife.
The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 provided compelling evidence that the observed relationship was not just a mere fluke or a whimsical happenstance. As surprising as it may seem, it appears that the adoption of GMOs in cotton production may have unintended, far-reaching implications on the fabric of society (pun intended).
This unexpected correlation challenges us to unravel the underlying mechanisms at play. Is it possible that the introduction of genetically modified cotton seeds has sown seeds of discontent in more ways than one? Could there be a biological, psychological, or even socio-economic explanation for this peculiar association? These questions, while amusing to ponder, demand rigorous investigation to comprehend the intricate dynamics at play.
In summary, our findings underscore the need for a nuanced understanding of the interplay between agricultural advancements and societal dynamics. The deep-rooted impact of GMOs in cotton farming on the divorce rate in Arkansas, as advocated by our study, calls for continued exploration and collaborative efforts across various disciplines. It is clear that the patchwork of human experiences and agricultural innovations may be more tightly interwoven than we ever imagined, and there is much yet to be discovered in this curious landscape.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In stitching up the findings of this study, we've spun a yarn of unexpected correlations and tangled relationships between GMO cotton and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Our results may have unraveled a mystery, but they have certainly woven a web of intrigue and puns thicker than a bale of unspun cotton.

As we reflect on the connection between genetic modifications in cotton and marital discontent, a few questions bob up like a buoy in the sea of data. Are genetically modified cotton fields sowing seeds of marital discord, or are there unseen forces at play? Perhaps the elusive Cotton Fairy is flitting around, sprinkling discontent in the fields under the disguise of GMOs.

While this study may seem more whimsical than pragmatic at first glance, it stitches together the need for interdisciplinary approaches in research. After all, it's not every day that we stumble upon a correlation as striking as a neon sheep in a regular flock.

However, before we lose ourselves in a labyrinth of further investigations, we must acknowledge that this study has twirled around the dance floor of curiosity as much as it can. It's time to hang up our lab coats and bowties, for this peculiar pairing of cotton and divorce has certainly made its mark in the annals of oddball correlations.

In conclusion, let's tie a bow on this research and declare that the unexpected link between GMO cotton and divorce in Arkansas has been thoroughly explored, and no more research in this area is needed. It's time we leave this enigmatic entanglement in the hands of future generations of intrepid researchers to untangle. After all, there are plenty more twine-stretching mysteries awaiting our academic crochet hooks!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Spinning Tales: The Genetic Modification of Cotton and the Unraveling of Marriages in Arkansas. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Genetics and Sociological Quandaries


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Spinning Tales: The Genetic Modification of Cotton and the Unraveling of Marriages in Arkansas. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association for Rural Genetics and Agricultural Ethics (ARGEAE)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Spinning Tales: The Genetic Modification of Cotton and the Unraveling of Marriages in Arkansas with an abstract of In this study, we examine the potential link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton farming and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Our research team utilized data from the USDA and CDC National Vital Statistics to conduct a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2000 to 2021. While the notion of GMOs in cotton leading to marital discontent may seem like a baleful yarn, our findings reveal a surprising correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8179777 and statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, our results suggest a strong association between GMO use in cotton production and the divorce rate in Arkansas. Our findings knit together a compelling argument for further investigation into the unforeseen impact of genetic modifications on societal dynamics. This study sheds light on the intertwined complexities of agricultural practices and human relationships, illustrating the need for interdisciplinary approaches in research.

ChatGPT:

genetically modified organisms in cotton, GMO cotton farming, divorce rate in Arkansas, correlation between GMOs and divorce, USDA data on cotton farming, CDC National Vital Statistics, genetic modifications and societal dynamics, agricultural practices and human relationships, interdisciplinary approaches in research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Arkansas
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Arkansas that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Arkansas

The divorce rate in Arkansas
Source: CDC National Vital Statistics
See what else correlates with The divorce rate in Arkansas

Correlation r = 0.8179777 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6690875 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 66.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The divorce rate in Arkansas) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Arkansas) over the 22 years from 2000 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.3E-6. 0.0000033195505746851404000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.00033% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 301,246 random variables You don't actually need 301 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.61, 0.92 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in cotton in Arkansas (GMO cotton %)332127243442283230282018102213777971211
The divorce rate in Arkansas (Divorce rate)6.46.26.266.165.85.95.55.75.75.35.35.011874.845324.842523.926383.719694.066934.017163.573643.61811




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([33,21,27,24,34,42,28,32,30,28,20,18,10,22,13,7,7,7,9,7,12,11,])
array_2 = np.array([6.4,6.2,6.2,6,6.1,6,5.8,5.9,5.5,5.7,5.7,5.3,5.3,5.01187,4.84532,4.84252,3.92638,3.71969,4.06693,4.01716,3.57364,3.61811,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Arkansas"
array_2_name = "The divorce rate in Arkansas"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 2038 · Black Variable ID: 768 · Red Variable ID: 19791
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0