about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,014 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is US kids in public school and the second variable is Total number of automotive recalls.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of US kids in public school increases, so does the total number of automotive recalls. This is because as more children attend school, the demand for parent volunteers for field trips and school events also rises. These parents, in an effort to impress other parents with their automotive prowess, start nitpicking at every little car issue, leading to a surge in reported problems. This ultimately overwhelms the automotive industry, forcing them to issue a higher number of recalls to appease the minivan-driving, snack-carrying army of parent volunteers. As a result, the roads become safer for school pickups, but also more congested with recalled vehicles, creating a peculiarly chaotic carpool paradox.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a group of children in vibrant backpacks standing in front of a yellow school bus. The children should be portrayed with unique expressions and diverse clothing. The scene should take place on a sunny day, with the school bus's door open and the driver visible in the front seat. In the background, display a large digital billboard that flashes the steadily increasing number of automotive recalls. The billboard should be prominently visible, contrasting the innocence of the children with the unsettling backdrop, creating a thought-provoking scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: US kids in public school and Total number of automotive recalls. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism 3D Pixar Style Cyber folk Hyper-realistic Realistic
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both US kids in public school and Total number of automotive recalls together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A group of kids in colorful backpacks are lined up in front of a school bus, while in the background, a large digital billboard displays the total number of automotive recalls increasing.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: A group of kids in colorful backpacks are lined up in front of a school bus, while in the background, a large digital billboard displays the total number of automotive recalls increasing. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a group of children in vibrant backpacks standing in front of a yellow school bus. The children should be portrayed with unique expressions and diverse clothing. The scene should take place on a sunny day, with the school bus's door open and the driver visible in the front seat. In the background, display a large digital billboard that flashes the steadily increasing number of automotive recalls. The billboard should be prominently visible, contrasting the innocence of the children with the unsettling backdrop, creating a thought-provoking scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in US kids in public school caused Total number of automotive recalls to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Schooling the Auto Industry: Exploring the Correlation Between US Public School Kids and Automotive Recalls

The Journal of Pedagogical Productivity and Automotive Safety

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US kids in public school and Total number of automotive recalls. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8651217 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Schooling the Auto Industry: Exploring the Correlation Between US Public School Kids and Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the curious relationship between the number of US students in public schools and the total number of automotive recalls spanning over three decades. Leveraging data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a comprehensive analysis to uncover a potential link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8651217 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 1990 to 2022, our findings suggest a striking connection between the population of school kids and the frequency of automotive recalls. Our study showcases the whimsical interplay between education and automotive safety, shedding light on the unforeseen influence of youngsters on the vehicular landscape. So buckle up and join us as we navigate the intriguing terrain of education, automobiles, and statistical insights!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US kids in public school and Total number of automotive recalls. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Schooling the Auto Industry: Exploring the Correlation Between US Public School Kids and Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the curious relationship between the number of US students in public schools and the total number of automotive recalls spanning over three decades. Leveraging data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a comprehensive analysis to uncover a potential link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8651217 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 1990 to 2022, our findings suggest a striking connection between the population of school kids and the frequency of automotive recalls. Our study showcases the whimsical interplay between education and automotive safety, shedding light on the unforeseen influence of youngsters on the vehicular landscape. So buckle up and join us as we navigate the intriguing terrain of education, automobiles, and statistical insights!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ah, the often unexpected and peculiar connections that we stumble upon in the realms of research! In this paper, we embark on a journey to unravel the perplexing correlation between the number of US students attending public schools and the frequency of automotive recalls. Who would have thought that the chatter and commotion in classrooms across the nation could hold any sway over the proverbial nuts and bolts of the automotive industry? Well, it seems that statistical analysis and data mining have something different to say about the matter.

As we delve into this unorthodox investigation, ponder with us for a moment: could the pondering, rambunctious energy of school kids be invisibly reverberating through the metallic frames and engines of our beloved automobiles? And how would that even be possible? Our quest involves uncovering the tantalizing connections between education and automotive safety, aiming to provide both light-hearted amusement and scholarly enlightenment.

A study of this nature not only piques the interest of curious minds but also prompts us to question the very fabric of cause and effect in our complex and interconnected world. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a ride filled with unexpected turns and engaging statistics – we assure you, this journey will be anything but mundane!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US kids in public school and Total number of automotive recalls. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Schooling the Auto Industry: Exploring the Correlation Between US Public School Kids and Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the curious relationship between the number of US students in public schools and the total number of automotive recalls spanning over three decades. Leveraging data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a comprehensive analysis to uncover a potential link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8651217 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 1990 to 2022, our findings suggest a striking connection between the population of school kids and the frequency of automotive recalls. Our study showcases the whimsical interplay between education and automotive safety, shedding light on the unforeseen influence of youngsters on the vehicular landscape. So buckle up and join us as we navigate the intriguing terrain of education, automobiles, and statistical insights!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the often unexpected and peculiar connections that we stumble upon in the realms of research! In this paper, we embark on a journey to unravel the perplexing correlation between the number of US students attending public schools and the frequency of automotive recalls. Who would have thought that the chatter and commotion in classrooms across the nation could hold any sway over the proverbial nuts and bolts of the automotive industry? Well, it seems that statistical analysis and data mining have something different to say about the matter.
As we delve into this unorthodox investigation, ponder with us for a moment: could the pondering, rambunctious energy of school kids be invisibly reverberating through the metallic frames and engines of our beloved automobiles? And how would that even be possible? Our quest involves uncovering the tantalizing connections between education and automotive safety, aiming to provide both light-hearted amusement and scholarly enlightenment.
A study of this nature not only piques the interest of curious minds but also prompts us to question the very fabric of cause and effect in our complex and interconnected world. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a ride filled with unexpected turns and engaging statistics – we assure you, this journey will be anything but mundane!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find a positive relationship between the number of US students in public schools and the total number of automotive recalls, suggesting a potential interplay between these seemingly disparate domains. Building on this curious revelation, "Doe and Jones" affirm the existence of a correlation, attributing it to the rambunctious energy of school kids shaking up the automotive landscape.

Extending beyond traditional academic sources, non-fiction works such as "How to Survive Your Freshman Year" by "Student and Expert" and "The Art of Racing in the Rain" by Garth Stein, offer intriguing perspectives on the influence of education and automobile culture. As we proceed into the realm of fiction, novels like "The Catcher in the Rye" by J.D. Salinger and "To Kill a Mockingbird" by Harper Lee, subtly allude to the unseen impact of youthful exuberance on the automotive industry.

In an unconventional twist, the literature review also encompasses insights from unexpected sources, including examining the likelihood of uncovering automotive insights in the fine print of CVS receipts. While this may seem whimsical, the obscure connections revealed in these mundane slips of paper cannot be overlooked.

These diverse sources, ranging from academic studies to literary works to everyday receipts, contribute to the rich tapestry of understanding the curious link between US public school kids and automotive recalls. Through an eclectic approach to the literature review, we aim to showcase the multifaceted nature of this enthralling correlation, while injecting a healthy dose of humor and unexpected twists into the scholarly discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US kids in public school and Total number of automotive recalls. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and US DOT . You used data from 1990 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Schooling the Auto Industry: Exploring the Correlation Between US Public School Kids and Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the curious relationship between the number of US students in public schools and the total number of automotive recalls spanning over three decades. Leveraging data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a comprehensive analysis to uncover a potential link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8651217 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 1990 to 2022, our findings suggest a striking connection between the population of school kids and the frequency of automotive recalls. Our study showcases the whimsical interplay between education and automotive safety, shedding light on the unforeseen influence of youngsters on the vehicular landscape. So buckle up and join us as we navigate the intriguing terrain of education, automobiles, and statistical insights!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the often unexpected and peculiar connections that we stumble upon in the realms of research! In this paper, we embark on a journey to unravel the perplexing correlation between the number of US students attending public schools and the frequency of automotive recalls. Who would have thought that the chatter and commotion in classrooms across the nation could hold any sway over the proverbial nuts and bolts of the automotive industry? Well, it seems that statistical analysis and data mining have something different to say about the matter.
As we delve into this unorthodox investigation, ponder with us for a moment: could the pondering, rambunctious energy of school kids be invisibly reverberating through the metallic frames and engines of our beloved automobiles? And how would that even be possible? Our quest involves uncovering the tantalizing connections between education and automotive safety, aiming to provide both light-hearted amusement and scholarly enlightenment.
A study of this nature not only piques the interest of curious minds but also prompts us to question the very fabric of cause and effect in our complex and interconnected world. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a ride filled with unexpected turns and engaging statistics – we assure you, this journey will be anything but mundane!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To explore the mysterious dance between US public school kids and the automotive industry, our research team embarked on a delightful romp through the rabbit hole of data analysis. With a twinkle in our eyes and a fervent desire for statistical mischief, we harnessed the power of information from the National Center for Education Statistics and the US Department of Transportation. Like intrepid explorers charting uncharted territory, we voyaged through the digital expanse from 1990 to 2022, unearthing nuggets of insight and unexpected correlations.

Our first order of business was to wrangle the voluminous datasets into submission, employing the arcane arts of data cleaning and wrangling. Through the judicious use of Python, R, and a liberal sprinkling of spreadsheet magic, we tidied up the disparate sources of data to ensure a harmonious cacophony of numbers and variables.

With our data polished and prepped, we joyfully employed a smorgasbord of statistical methods to uncover the elusive relationship between the population of school kids and the frequency of automotive recalls. Armed with correlation analyses, time series models, and regression techniques, we paraded through the statistical landscape with gusto, eager to unveil the tantalizing connections hidden within the numerical tapestry.

Additionally, we indulged in a spot of geographical analysis, tracing the geographical distribution of both school kids and automotive recalls with an eye to unearthing regional peculiarities and idiosyncrasies. Our cartographic escapades served to add a dash of cartographical whimsy to the mix, bringing a spatial dimension to our jolly jaunt through the data.

Furthermore, we delved into the historical context of educational reforms, automotive safety regulations, and the whimsical ebb and flow of societal trends, weaving a narrative tapestry that contextualized the statistical revelations within the broader fabric of human endeavor.

Lastly, we regaled our data with a repertoire of visual embellishments, adorning our findings with bar charts, line plots, and heatmaps that beckoned the eye and enraptured the mind.

In sum, our methodology was nothing short of an exuberant carnival of statistical dalliance, combining rigorous methods with a gleeful sense of adventure. Our data danced, our models frolicked, and our findings regaled us with unexpected revelations – and perhaps a touch of statistical merriment along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US kids in public school and Total number of automotive recalls. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and US DOT .

For the time period 1990 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8651217, r-squared of 0.7484355, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Schooling the Auto Industry: Exploring the Correlation Between US Public School Kids and Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the curious relationship between the number of US students in public schools and the total number of automotive recalls spanning over three decades. Leveraging data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a comprehensive analysis to uncover a potential link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8651217 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 1990 to 2022, our findings suggest a striking connection between the population of school kids and the frequency of automotive recalls. Our study showcases the whimsical interplay between education and automotive safety, shedding light on the unforeseen influence of youngsters on the vehicular landscape. So buckle up and join us as we navigate the intriguing terrain of education, automobiles, and statistical insights!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the often unexpected and peculiar connections that we stumble upon in the realms of research! In this paper, we embark on a journey to unravel the perplexing correlation between the number of US students attending public schools and the frequency of automotive recalls. Who would have thought that the chatter and commotion in classrooms across the nation could hold any sway over the proverbial nuts and bolts of the automotive industry? Well, it seems that statistical analysis and data mining have something different to say about the matter.
As we delve into this unorthodox investigation, ponder with us for a moment: could the pondering, rambunctious energy of school kids be invisibly reverberating through the metallic frames and engines of our beloved automobiles? And how would that even be possible? Our quest involves uncovering the tantalizing connections between education and automotive safety, aiming to provide both light-hearted amusement and scholarly enlightenment.
A study of this nature not only piques the interest of curious minds but also prompts us to question the very fabric of cause and effect in our complex and interconnected world. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a ride filled with unexpected turns and engaging statistics – we assure you, this journey will be anything but mundane!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between the number of US students in public schools and the total number of automotive recalls yielded some surprising and quite frankly amusing results. Our research uncovered a strong positive correlation of 0.8651217 between these two variables, with an r-squared value of 0.7484355, and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship. It seems that the academic chatter and the automotive rumble have more in common than meets the eye.

Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating this robust correlation, and it is safe to say that the data points are aligned more closely than a convoy of cars on a busy highway. It's as if the population of school kids is exerting a gravitational pull on the automotive industry, leading to a tangible impact on the number of recalls. Who would have thought that the process of education could have such a tireless effect on the wheels of the automotive world?

In summary, our findings divulge a peculiar yet substantial association between the demographic composition of public school students and the frequency of automotive recalls. The wheels of education and the gears of the automotive industry seem to be spinning in unison, unveiling a whimsical and somewhat inexplicable connection that surely raises more than a few eyebrows. So, in the grand scheme of things, it appears that the school bell rings not only for education but also for the auto industry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US kids in public school and Total number of automotive recalls. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Schooling the Auto Industry: Exploring the Correlation Between US Public School Kids and Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the curious relationship between the number of US students in public schools and the total number of automotive recalls spanning over three decades. Leveraging data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a comprehensive analysis to uncover a potential link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8651217 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 1990 to 2022, our findings suggest a striking connection between the population of school kids and the frequency of automotive recalls. Our study showcases the whimsical interplay between education and automotive safety, shedding light on the unforeseen influence of youngsters on the vehicular landscape. So buckle up and join us as we navigate the intriguing terrain of education, automobiles, and statistical insights!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a positive relationship between the number of US students in public schools and the total number of automotive recalls, suggesting a potential interplay between these seemingly disparate domains. Building on this curious revelation, "Doe and Jones" affirm the existence of a correlation, attributing it to the rambunctious energy of school kids shaking up the automotive landscape.
Extending beyond traditional academic sources, non-fiction works such as "How to Survive Your Freshman Year" by "Student and Expert" and "The Art of Racing in the Rain" by Garth Stein, offer intriguing perspectives on the influence of education and automobile culture. As we proceed into the realm of fiction, novels like "The Catcher in the Rye" by J.D. Salinger and "To Kill a Mockingbird" by Harper Lee, subtly allude to the unseen impact of youthful exuberance on the automotive industry.
In an unconventional twist, the literature review also encompasses insights from unexpected sources, including examining the likelihood of uncovering automotive insights in the fine print of CVS receipts. While this may seem whimsical, the obscure connections revealed in these mundane slips of paper cannot be overlooked.
These diverse sources, ranging from academic studies to literary works to everyday receipts, contribute to the rich tapestry of understanding the curious link between US public school kids and automotive recalls. Through an eclectic approach to the literature review, we aim to showcase the multifaceted nature of this enthralling correlation, while injecting a healthy dose of humor and unexpected twists into the scholarly discourse.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of US students in public schools and the total number of automotive recalls yielded some surprising and quite frankly amusing results. Our research uncovered a strong positive correlation of 0.8651217 between these two variables, with an r-squared value of 0.7484355, and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship. It seems that the academic chatter and the automotive rumble have more in common than meets the eye.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating this robust correlation, and it is safe to say that the data points are aligned more closely than a convoy of cars on a busy highway. It's as if the population of school kids is exerting a gravitational pull on the automotive industry, leading to a tangible impact on the number of recalls. Who would have thought that the process of education could have such a tireless effect on the wheels of the automotive world?
In summary, our findings divulge a peculiar yet substantial association between the demographic composition of public school students and the frequency of automotive recalls. The wheels of education and the gears of the automotive industry seem to be spinning in unison, unveiling a whimsical and somewhat inexplicable connection that surely raises more than a few eyebrows. So, in the grand scheme of things, it appears that the school bell rings not only for education but also for the auto industry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has surfaced an enthralling correlation between the number of US students in public schools and the frequency of automotive recalls, further substantiating the curious interplay between education and vehicular safety. It seems that this connection is not merely a flight of fancy, as whimsical as it may appear. Our results align with prior research, echoing the findings of "Smith et al." and "Doe and Jones," who similarly unearthed this unexpected relationship. The academic banter around this subject is surely revving up, and our study adds substantial mileage to the discourse.

Interestingly, our literature review's quirky exploration of the connection between automotive culture and education, delving into non-traditional sources ranging from novels like "The Catcher in the Rye" to obscure insights in CVS receipts, actually offers valuable insights. The multifaceted nature of this correlation is undeniable, and our results provide concrete evidence to support the unlikely alliance between school kids and automotive recalls.

The robust positive correlation coefficient of 0.8651217 and the p-value less than 0.01 from our analysis affirm the strength of the link. It's as clear as the windshield on a freshly washed car – there is a tangible relationship between the population of school kids and the number of automotive recalls. It's almost as if these school kids are exerting a magnetic force on the automotive industry, shaking things up more than a group of teenagers at a rock concert.

Our findings contribute to a richer understanding of the intricate and, dare we say, charming connection between education and the wheels of the automotive world. As we continue to unpack this connection, we invite fellow scholars to join us in the merry dance of statistical analysis and whimsical correlations. After all, isn't it refreshing to unveil unexpected connections in a sea of predictability? So, fasten your seatbelts and get ready for a joyride through the unexplored territory of academic research and lighthearted statistical revelations!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US kids in public school and Total number of automotive recalls. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Schooling the Auto Industry: Exploring the Correlation Between US Public School Kids and Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the curious relationship between the number of US students in public schools and the total number of automotive recalls spanning over three decades. Leveraging data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a comprehensive analysis to uncover a potential link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8651217 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 1990 to 2022, our findings suggest a striking connection between the population of school kids and the frequency of automotive recalls. Our study showcases the whimsical interplay between education and automotive safety, shedding light on the unforeseen influence of youngsters on the vehicular landscape. So buckle up and join us as we navigate the intriguing terrain of education, automobiles, and statistical insights!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the often unexpected and peculiar connections that we stumble upon in the realms of research! In this paper, we embark on a journey to unravel the perplexing correlation between the number of US students attending public schools and the frequency of automotive recalls. Who would have thought that the chatter and commotion in classrooms across the nation could hold any sway over the proverbial nuts and bolts of the automotive industry? Well, it seems that statistical analysis and data mining have something different to say about the matter.
As we delve into this unorthodox investigation, ponder with us for a moment: could the pondering, rambunctious energy of school kids be invisibly reverberating through the metallic frames and engines of our beloved automobiles? And how would that even be possible? Our quest involves uncovering the tantalizing connections between education and automotive safety, aiming to provide both light-hearted amusement and scholarly enlightenment.
A study of this nature not only piques the interest of curious minds but also prompts us to question the very fabric of cause and effect in our complex and interconnected world. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a ride filled with unexpected turns and engaging statistics – we assure you, this journey will be anything but mundane!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of US students in public schools and the total number of automotive recalls yielded some surprising and quite frankly amusing results. Our research uncovered a strong positive correlation of 0.8651217 between these two variables, with an r-squared value of 0.7484355, and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a highly significant relationship. It seems that the academic chatter and the automotive rumble have more in common than meets the eye.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating this robust correlation, and it is safe to say that the data points are aligned more closely than a convoy of cars on a busy highway. It's as if the population of school kids is exerting a gravitational pull on the automotive industry, leading to a tangible impact on the number of recalls. Who would have thought that the process of education could have such a tireless effect on the wheels of the automotive world?
In summary, our findings divulge a peculiar yet substantial association between the demographic composition of public school students and the frequency of automotive recalls. The wheels of education and the gears of the automotive industry seem to be spinning in unison, unveiling a whimsical and somewhat inexplicable connection that surely raises more than a few eyebrows. So, in the grand scheme of things, it appears that the school bell rings not only for education but also for the auto industry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has shed light on the rather unexpected and comical relationship between the number of US students in public schools and the frequency of automotive recalls. It appears that the academic vigor and youthful exuberance permeating the hallowed halls of education may have a more profound impact on the automotive world than previously imagined. As we wrap up this whimsical journey through the corridors of statistics and correlation, it becomes abundantly clear that the rambunctious energy of school kids has an undeniable influence on the vehicular landscape.

The robust positive correlation between these seemingly disparate variables, as evidenced by our analysis, has left us pondering the confounding ways in which education and automotive safety intersect. It seems the students' collective energy is resonating through the very metal and machinery of the automotive industry, resulting in a noteworthy impact on the frequency of recalls. One might even say that their influence is driving the industry in unexpected directions, much like a car with a misaligned steering wheel!

As we draw the curtain on this captivating investigation, it becomes apparent that the academic chatter and automotive rumble are more entwined than a pair of seat belts in a well-worn station wagon, showcasing the quirky interconnectedness of our world. It is with a sense of both bemusement and scholarly fascination that we assert that no further research on this subject is warranted. The evidence overwhelmingly suggests that the wheels of education and the gears of the automotive industry are a matched set, and no amount of further inquiry could possibly puncture the tire of this exuberant correlation!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Schooling the Auto Industry: Exploring the Correlation Between US Public School Kids and Automotive Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Pedagogical Productivity and Automotive Safety


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Schooling the Auto Industry: Exploring the Correlation Between US Public School Kids and Automotive Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Educational Autonomy and Engineering Accountability


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Schooling the Auto Industry: Exploring the Correlation Between US Public School Kids and Automotive Recalls with an abstract of This research paper delves into the curious relationship between the number of US students in public schools and the total number of automotive recalls spanning over three decades. Leveraging data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the US Department of Transportation, we conducted a comprehensive analysis to uncover a potential link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8651217 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 1990 to 2022, our findings suggest a striking connection between the population of school kids and the frequency of automotive recalls. Our study showcases the whimsical interplay between education and automotive safety, shedding light on the unforeseen influence of youngsters on the vehicular landscape. So buckle up and join us as we navigate the intriguing terrain of education, automobiles, and statistical insights!

ChatGPT:

US public school kids, automotive recalls, correlation, education statistics, US Department of Transportation, student population, vehicular safety, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, educational influence, automotive industry, school enrollment, vehicle safety regulations, demographic trends, US education system

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

US kids in public school
Detailed data title: Enrollment in public elementary and secondary schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with US kids in public school

Total number of automotive recalls
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Total number of automotive recalls

Correlation r = 0.8651217 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7484355 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 74.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total number of automotive recalls) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., US kids in public school) over the 33 years from 1990 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.3E-11. 0.0000000000834489920529581100
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 8.3E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 11,983,368,228 random variables You don't actually need 11 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 32 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 32 because we have two variables measured over a period of 33 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.74, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
US kids in public school (Students)412167004204690042823300434649004411150044840500456110004612690046538600468571004720350047671900481831004854020048795500491133004931580049290600492656004936100049484200495217004977110050044500503126005043800050615200506856005069410050796400493748004943310049262300
Total number of automotive recalls (Recalls)2702812172642883573413184134446215595106006996456137137805707226556617108699711031897103296388310931050




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([41216700,42046900,42823300,43464900,44111500,44840500,45611000,46126900,46538600,46857100,47203500,47671900,48183100,48540200,48795500,49113300,49315800,49290600,49265600,49361000,49484200,49521700,49771100,50044500,50312600,50438000,50615200,50685600,50694100,50796400,49374800,49433100,49262300,])
array_2 = np.array([270,281,217,264,288,357,341,318,413,444,621,559,510,600,699,645,613,713,780,570,722,655,661,710,869,971,1031,897,1032,963,883,1093,1050,])
array_1_name = "US kids in public school"
array_2_name = "Total number of automotive recalls"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 2014 · Black Variable ID: 1296 · Red Variable ID: 1116
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0