about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,964 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn and the second variable is Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM).  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more GMO corn was grown, it led to a-maize-ing profits for farmers. This increased their disposable husk, so they were more likely to travel and book accommodations through Trip.com, causing the stock price to pop like popcorn in a hot pan.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a cute 2D animation that depicts a lively sun-drenched cornfield. The genetically modified cornstalks sway gently in the breeze as the sun sets, casting a warm golden glow. In the background, a digital ticker displays Trip.com Group's stock price steadily rising against the clear blue sky. The scene is filled with a sense of charm and whimsy, with a hint of technological advancement integrated into the natural beauty. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn and Trip.com Group's stock price. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image Cubism Cute 2D animation Concept art Cute 2D animation
ChatGPT: Cute 2D animation

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn and Trip.com Group's stock price together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sun-drenched cornfield, tall stalks of genetically modified corn sway in the breeze. Beside the field, a digital ticker displays Trip.com Group's stock price steadily rising against the clear blue sky.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute 2D animation ] and depicting this scene: In a sun-drenched cornfield, tall stalks of genetically modified corn sway in the breeze. Beside the field, a digital ticker displays Trip.com Group's stock price steadily rising against the clear blue sky. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a cute 2D animation that depicts a lively sun-drenched cornfield. The genetically modified cornstalks sway gently in the breeze as the sun sets, casting a warm golden glow. In the background, a digital ticker displays Trip.com Group's stock price steadily rising against the clear blue sky. The scene is filled with a sense of charm and whimsy, with a hint of technological advancement integrated into the natural beauty.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn caused Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM) to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Kernels of Truth: Genetically Modified Corn and the Stock Price Conundrum

The Journal of Agricultural Economics and Ethical Dilemmas

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Trip.com Group's stock price. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8326389 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Kernels of Truth: Genetically Modified Corn and the Stock Price Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the captivating world of genetically modified corn and its peculiar connection to the stock price of Trip.com Group. Utilizing data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2004 to 2023. Astonishingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.8326389 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 emerged from our investigation.

The correlation between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the fluctuations in Trip.com Group's stock price has raised eyebrows and led to an intriguing journey of inquiry. While the pervasive nature of genetically modified corn undoubtedly warrants attention, the unexpected link to a stock price trajectory adds a twist of enigma to this research endeavor.

In unraveling this enigmatic relationship, we shed light on the potential implications and ripple effects that may arise from the intersection of these seemingly disparate realms. Through our dry but witty exploration, we offer a whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective on the interconnectedness of agriculture and finance, demonstrating that even the most unexpected pairings can unveil kernels of truth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Trip.com Group's stock price. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kernels of Truth: Genetically Modified Corn and the Stock Price Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the captivating world of genetically modified corn and its peculiar connection to the stock price of Trip.com Group. Utilizing data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2004 to 2023. Astonishingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.8326389 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 emerged from our investigation.

The correlation between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the fluctuations in Trip.com Group's stock price has raised eyebrows and led to an intriguing journey of inquiry. While the pervasive nature of genetically modified corn undoubtedly warrants attention, the unexpected link to a stock price trajectory adds a twist of enigma to this research endeavor.

In unraveling this enigmatic relationship, we shed light on the potential implications and ripple effects that may arise from the intersection of these seemingly disparate realms. Through our dry but witty exploration, we offer a whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective on the interconnectedness of agriculture and finance, demonstrating that even the most unexpected pairings can unveil kernels of truth.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Within the labyrinthine realm of agricultural biotechnology and the capricious landscape of financial markets, a peculiar correlation has emerged, entwining genetically modified corn with the stock price trajectory of Trip.com Group. The seemingly incongruous pairing of agricultural innovation and stock market fluctuations has evoked both intrigue and incredulity among scholars and enthusiasts alike.

We embarked on this research endeavor to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms in corn cultivation and the unpredictable undulations in Trip.com Group's stock price. Akin to a scientific detective, we aimed to unearth clues and discern the hidden threads that weave these seemingly disparate domains together.

Amidst the chorus of statistical analyses and the fervent pursuit of causality, we found ourselves lured into an intellectual tango, dancing between the intricacies of crop genetics and the caprices of market sentiments. As we unraveled the data, a peculiar symphony of numbers and variables echoed through our analytical minds, both befuddling and beguiling us with their numerical dance.

Our dry but witty exploration seeks to uplift the drab veil of traditional research, injecting a dash of levity into the otherwise dour world of scholarly inquiry. The whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective that we offer promises to illuminate the otherwise dimly lit corridors of interconnectedness between agriculture and finance.

As we venture forth into the heart of our analysis, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a lighthearted yet astute journey through the conundrum of genetically modified corn and Trip.com Group's stock price. For, as we shall soon reveal, even the most unexpected pairings can unveil kernels of truth, nestled within the convoluted fields of data and analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Trip.com Group's stock price. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kernels of Truth: Genetically Modified Corn and the Stock Price Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the captivating world of genetically modified corn and its peculiar connection to the stock price of Trip.com Group. Utilizing data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2004 to 2023. Astonishingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.8326389 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 emerged from our investigation.

The correlation between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the fluctuations in Trip.com Group's stock price has raised eyebrows and led to an intriguing journey of inquiry. While the pervasive nature of genetically modified corn undoubtedly warrants attention, the unexpected link to a stock price trajectory adds a twist of enigma to this research endeavor.

In unraveling this enigmatic relationship, we shed light on the potential implications and ripple effects that may arise from the intersection of these seemingly disparate realms. Through our dry but witty exploration, we offer a whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective on the interconnectedness of agriculture and finance, demonstrating that even the most unexpected pairings can unveil kernels of truth.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Within the labyrinthine realm of agricultural biotechnology and the capricious landscape of financial markets, a peculiar correlation has emerged, entwining genetically modified corn with the stock price trajectory of Trip.com Group. The seemingly incongruous pairing of agricultural innovation and stock market fluctuations has evoked both intrigue and incredulity among scholars and enthusiasts alike.
We embarked on this research endeavor to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms in corn cultivation and the unpredictable undulations in Trip.com Group's stock price. Akin to a scientific detective, we aimed to unearth clues and discern the hidden threads that weave these seemingly disparate domains together.
Amidst the chorus of statistical analyses and the fervent pursuit of causality, we found ourselves lured into an intellectual tango, dancing between the intricacies of crop genetics and the caprices of market sentiments. As we unraveled the data, a peculiar symphony of numbers and variables echoed through our analytical minds, both befuddling and beguiling us with their numerical dance.
Our dry but witty exploration seeks to uplift the drab veil of traditional research, injecting a dash of levity into the otherwise dour world of scholarly inquiry. The whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective that we offer promises to illuminate the otherwise dimly lit corridors of interconnectedness between agriculture and finance.
As we venture forth into the heart of our analysis, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a lighthearted yet astute journey through the conundrum of genetically modified corn and Trip.com Group's stock price. For, as we shall soon reveal, even the most unexpected pairings can unveil kernels of truth, nestled within the convoluted fields of data and analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors find that Smith et al. (2015) present a comprehensive analysis of the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation. Their study examines the agronomic, economic, and environmental impacts of GMO corn, providing a nuanced understanding of its implications. Likewise, Doe and Jones (2018) offer insights into the market dynamics and stock price fluctuations of Trip.com Group, elucidating the multifaceted factors that influence its valuation.

In "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan, the author delves into the intricate web of food production, highlighting the impact of GMOs on the agricultural landscape. Meanwhile, "The Price of Tomorrow" by Jeff Booth contemplates the interplay between technology and financial markets, advocating for a deeper comprehension of market behaviors.

Transitioning from non-fiction to fiction, "Jurassic Park" by Michael Crichton presents a fictional narrative surrounding genetic engineering and its unintended consequences. On a lighter note, the whimsical world of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" by Roald Dahl mirrors the wonderment and ambiguity evoked by our research inquiry.

Reflecting on childhood television, the animated series "Dexter's Laboratory" playfully echoes the essence of scientific exploration, encapsulating the curious spirit driving our investigation. Similarly, "SpongeBob SquarePants" whimsically portrays the ebbs and flows of daily life, serving as an unexpected muse for contemplating the unpredictable undulations of stock prices.

As we immerse ourselves in the juxtaposition of serious scholarship and surprising associations, the interweaving of disparate realms invites us to consider the unexpected harmonies that underpin the fabric of our research pursuit. This rich tapestry of literature sets the stage for our lighthearted yet astute examination of the intricate dance between genetically modified corn and the enigmatic stock price conundrum of Trip.com Group.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Trip.com Group's stock price. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kernels of Truth: Genetically Modified Corn and the Stock Price Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the captivating world of genetically modified corn and its peculiar connection to the stock price of Trip.com Group. Utilizing data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2004 to 2023. Astonishingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.8326389 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 emerged from our investigation.

The correlation between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the fluctuations in Trip.com Group's stock price has raised eyebrows and led to an intriguing journey of inquiry. While the pervasive nature of genetically modified corn undoubtedly warrants attention, the unexpected link to a stock price trajectory adds a twist of enigma to this research endeavor.

In unraveling this enigmatic relationship, we shed light on the potential implications and ripple effects that may arise from the intersection of these seemingly disparate realms. Through our dry but witty exploration, we offer a whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective on the interconnectedness of agriculture and finance, demonstrating that even the most unexpected pairings can unveil kernels of truth.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Within the labyrinthine realm of agricultural biotechnology and the capricious landscape of financial markets, a peculiar correlation has emerged, entwining genetically modified corn with the stock price trajectory of Trip.com Group. The seemingly incongruous pairing of agricultural innovation and stock market fluctuations has evoked both intrigue and incredulity among scholars and enthusiasts alike.
We embarked on this research endeavor to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms in corn cultivation and the unpredictable undulations in Trip.com Group's stock price. Akin to a scientific detective, we aimed to unearth clues and discern the hidden threads that weave these seemingly disparate domains together.
Amidst the chorus of statistical analyses and the fervent pursuit of causality, we found ourselves lured into an intellectual tango, dancing between the intricacies of crop genetics and the caprices of market sentiments. As we unraveled the data, a peculiar symphony of numbers and variables echoed through our analytical minds, both befuddling and beguiling us with their numerical dance.
Our dry but witty exploration seeks to uplift the drab veil of traditional research, injecting a dash of levity into the otherwise dour world of scholarly inquiry. The whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective that we offer promises to illuminate the otherwise dimly lit corridors of interconnectedness between agriculture and finance.
As we venture forth into the heart of our analysis, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a lighthearted yet astute journey through the conundrum of genetically modified corn and Trip.com Group's stock price. For, as we shall soon reveal, even the most unexpected pairings can unveil kernels of truth, nestled within the convoluted fields of data and analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The research methodology employed a combination of unorthodox yet rigorously structured approaches, akin to a waltz between convention and quirkiness. The study utilized a longitudinal, time-series design to capture the ebb and flow of GMO adoption in corn cultivation and its potential impact on Trip.com Group's stock price.

Data on the prevalence of GMOs in corn cultivation was primarily derived from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), offering a comprehensive insight into the trajectory of genetic modification within the corn industry. The financial data pertaining to Trip.com Group's stock price was sourced from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), guiding us through the labyrinthine fluctuations of market valuations and fervent investor sentiments.

Employing a systematic sampling approach, the study secured an extensive dataset spanning from 2004 to 2023. This comprehensive timeline allowed for a nuanced exploration of the evolving relationship between GMO adoption in corn and the stock price conundrum, encapsulating both the steady march of agricultural innovation and the erratic undulations of financial markets.

To untangle the enigmatic connection between genetically modified corn and Trip.com Group's stock price, a suite of statistical analyses was performed. Spearheaded by the stalwart Pearson correlation coefficient, the study sought to discern the strength and direction of the association between GMO adoption and stock price fluctuations. The statistical significance of the correlation was assessed through p-values, ensuring robustness in the interpretation of the findings.

To further tease out the nuances of this eclectic relationship, additional multivariate analyses, including regression models and momentous autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) structures, were deployed. These intricately crafted statistical constructs aimed to disentangle the potential causal pathways and temporal dynamics underlying the interplay between GMO adoption in corn and Trip.com Group's stock price gyrations.

In an endeavor to infuse a dash of levity into the rigorous research process, the exploration of GMOs and stock prices was compounded by an engaging array of hypothesis testing, stochastic simulations, and witty banter amongst the research team members. While these may not be standard components of conventional research methodologies, they served to bolster the collaborative spirit and intellectual curiosity permeating the investigation.

Thus, the methodological framework presented a whimsical yet robust amalgamation of traditional statistical analyses and offbeat conjecture, reflecting the resilient pursuit of knowledge in the face of enigmatic interconnections. As the analysis unfurled, the data divulged its peculiar tale, entwining the genetic nuances of corn with the capricious cadence of stock price fluctuations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Trip.com Group's stock price. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8326389, r-squared of 0.6932875, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Kernels of Truth: Genetically Modified Corn and the Stock Price Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the captivating world of genetically modified corn and its peculiar connection to the stock price of Trip.com Group. Utilizing data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2004 to 2023. Astonishingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.8326389 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 emerged from our investigation.

The correlation between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the fluctuations in Trip.com Group's stock price has raised eyebrows and led to an intriguing journey of inquiry. While the pervasive nature of genetically modified corn undoubtedly warrants attention, the unexpected link to a stock price trajectory adds a twist of enigma to this research endeavor.

In unraveling this enigmatic relationship, we shed light on the potential implications and ripple effects that may arise from the intersection of these seemingly disparate realms. Through our dry but witty exploration, we offer a whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective on the interconnectedness of agriculture and finance, demonstrating that even the most unexpected pairings can unveil kernels of truth.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Within the labyrinthine realm of agricultural biotechnology and the capricious landscape of financial markets, a peculiar correlation has emerged, entwining genetically modified corn with the stock price trajectory of Trip.com Group. The seemingly incongruous pairing of agricultural innovation and stock market fluctuations has evoked both intrigue and incredulity among scholars and enthusiasts alike.
We embarked on this research endeavor to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms in corn cultivation and the unpredictable undulations in Trip.com Group's stock price. Akin to a scientific detective, we aimed to unearth clues and discern the hidden threads that weave these seemingly disparate domains together.
Amidst the chorus of statistical analyses and the fervent pursuit of causality, we found ourselves lured into an intellectual tango, dancing between the intricacies of crop genetics and the caprices of market sentiments. As we unraveled the data, a peculiar symphony of numbers and variables echoed through our analytical minds, both befuddling and beguiling us with their numerical dance.
Our dry but witty exploration seeks to uplift the drab veil of traditional research, injecting a dash of levity into the otherwise dour world of scholarly inquiry. The whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective that we offer promises to illuminate the otherwise dimly lit corridors of interconnectedness between agriculture and finance.
As we venture forth into the heart of our analysis, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a lighthearted yet astute journey through the conundrum of genetically modified corn and Trip.com Group's stock price. For, as we shall soon reveal, even the most unexpected pairings can unveil kernels of truth, nestled within the convoluted fields of data and analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

A correlation coefficient of 0.8326389 between the adoption of genetically modified organisms in corn cultivation and the stock price fluctuations of Trip.com Group was unearthed from our extensive analysis. The lofty r-squared value of 0.6932875 further reinforced this robust relationship, signifying that approximately 69.3% of the variability in Trip.com Group's stock price can be attributed to the adoption of GMOs in corn. The p-value of less than 0.01 reinforced the statistical significance of this correlation, leaving no room for doubt in the veracity of this compelling connection.

The figure (Fig. 1) depicts a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between the adoption of genetically modified corn and the oscillations in Trip.com Group's stock price. This visual representation serves as an incontrovertible testament to the robustness of our findings, portraying a captivating dance of data points that speaks volumes about the intertwined fate of these seemingly disparate entities. The measurable impact of genetically modified corn on Trip.com Group's stock price gyrations is as clear as day, illustrating that the kernels of truth we seek are indeed firmly rooted in the web of statistics and analysis.

Our research endeavor has peeled back the layers of enigma shrouding this unexpected relationship, illuminating the peculiar connection between agricultural biotechnology and the fickle landscape of financial markets. The complex interplay of genetic modification and stock price undulations has contributed a splash of intrigue to the academic tableau, inspiring a whimsical yet perceptive journey through the interstitial realms of agriculture and finance. This unexpected union has reminded us that, in the world of scholarly inquiry, even the most unassuming variables can unveil kernels of truth, nestled amidst the labyrinth of data and analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Trip.com Group's stock price. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Kernels of Truth: Genetically Modified Corn and the Stock Price Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the captivating world of genetically modified corn and its peculiar connection to the stock price of Trip.com Group. Utilizing data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2004 to 2023. Astonishingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.8326389 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 emerged from our investigation.

The correlation between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the fluctuations in Trip.com Group's stock price has raised eyebrows and led to an intriguing journey of inquiry. While the pervasive nature of genetically modified corn undoubtedly warrants attention, the unexpected link to a stock price trajectory adds a twist of enigma to this research endeavor.

In unraveling this enigmatic relationship, we shed light on the potential implications and ripple effects that may arise from the intersection of these seemingly disparate realms. Through our dry but witty exploration, we offer a whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective on the interconnectedness of agriculture and finance, demonstrating that even the most unexpected pairings can unveil kernels of truth.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors find that Smith et al. (2015) present a comprehensive analysis of the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation. Their study examines the agronomic, economic, and environmental impacts of GMO corn, providing a nuanced understanding of its implications. Likewise, Doe and Jones (2018) offer insights into the market dynamics and stock price fluctuations of Trip.com Group, elucidating the multifaceted factors that influence its valuation.
In "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan, the author delves into the intricate web of food production, highlighting the impact of GMOs on the agricultural landscape. Meanwhile, "The Price of Tomorrow" by Jeff Booth contemplates the interplay between technology and financial markets, advocating for a deeper comprehension of market behaviors.
Transitioning from non-fiction to fiction, "Jurassic Park" by Michael Crichton presents a fictional narrative surrounding genetic engineering and its unintended consequences. On a lighter note, the whimsical world of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" by Roald Dahl mirrors the wonderment and ambiguity evoked by our research inquiry.
Reflecting on childhood television, the animated series "Dexter's Laboratory" playfully echoes the essence of scientific exploration, encapsulating the curious spirit driving our investigation. Similarly, "SpongeBob SquarePants" whimsically portrays the ebbs and flows of daily life, serving as an unexpected muse for contemplating the unpredictable undulations of stock prices.
As we immerse ourselves in the juxtaposition of serious scholarship and surprising associations, the interweaving of disparate realms invites us to consider the unexpected harmonies that underpin the fabric of our research pursuit. This rich tapestry of literature sets the stage for our lighthearted yet astute examination of the intricate dance between genetically modified corn and the enigmatic stock price conundrum of Trip.com Group.

[[RESULTS]]
A correlation coefficient of 0.8326389 between the adoption of genetically modified organisms in corn cultivation and the stock price fluctuations of Trip.com Group was unearthed from our extensive analysis. The lofty r-squared value of 0.6932875 further reinforced this robust relationship, signifying that approximately 69.3% of the variability in Trip.com Group's stock price can be attributed to the adoption of GMOs in corn. The p-value of less than 0.01 reinforced the statistical significance of this correlation, leaving no room for doubt in the veracity of this compelling connection.
The figure (Fig. 1) depicts a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between the adoption of genetically modified corn and the oscillations in Trip.com Group's stock price. This visual representation serves as an incontrovertible testament to the robustness of our findings, portraying a captivating dance of data points that speaks volumes about the intertwined fate of these seemingly disparate entities. The measurable impact of genetically modified corn on Trip.com Group's stock price gyrations is as clear as day, illustrating that the kernels of truth we seek are indeed firmly rooted in the web of statistics and analysis.
Our research endeavor has peeled back the layers of enigma shrouding this unexpected relationship, illuminating the peculiar connection between agricultural biotechnology and the fickle landscape of financial markets. The complex interplay of genetic modification and stock price undulations has contributed a splash of intrigue to the academic tableau, inspiring a whimsical yet perceptive journey through the interstitial realms of agriculture and finance. This unexpected union has reminded us that, in the world of scholarly inquiry, even the most unassuming variables can unveil kernels of truth, nestled amidst the labyrinth of data and analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation have brought to light a captivating intricacy in the web of agricultural biotechnology and financial markets. As we navigate through this melodious symphony of statistics and stock price undulations, our findings have fortuitously aligned with prior research, lending credence to the multifaceted nature of our inquiry.

The correlation coefficient of 0.8326389 unveiled in our analysis exudes a robust resonance with the insights gleaned from the agronomic, economic, and environmental impacts of GMO corn elucidated by Smith et al. (2015). Much like the genetically modified corn, our research has taken root in the fertile soil of empirical evidence, sprouting forth a flourishing affirmation of the interconnectedness between agricultural biotechnology and market dynamics.

Furthermore, our foray into the enigmatic realm of Trip.com Group's stock price undulations has strikingly paralleled the insights offered by Doe and Jones (2018), who delved into the intricate dance of market forces influencing the valuation of this enigmatic entity. As we stand at the precipice of this captivating correlation, it becomes apparent that our findings stand not as a mere coincidence, but rather as a resounding echo of the nuanced interactions between financial markets and the variables that shape their undulating landscape.

The whimsical inspiration drawn from "Jurassic Park" by Michael Crichton has transmuted into a resoundingly earnest exploration, illuminating the unforeseen consequences and unforeseen connections that underpin the fabric of our research pursuit. As we journey through this labyrinth of data and analysis, reminiscent of the captivating wonderment evoked by "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" by Roald Dahl, it is evident that unexpected pairings can indeed unveil kernels of truth, nestled amidst the playful undulations of stock prices and the enduring vigor of agricultural innovation.

The inexorable entwining of disparate realms has beckoned us to embrace the unexpected harmonies that underpin the whimsical world of scholarly inquiry, demonstrating that even the most unassuming variables can hold profound insights into the enigmatic dance of statistics and market behavior. Through this whimsical yet astute journey, we have cast light upon the serendipitous meanderings of unforeseen relationships, showcasing that even the most playful muse can yield kernels of wisdom amidst the ebbs and flows of our scholarly pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Trip.com Group's stock price. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Kernels of Truth: Genetically Modified Corn and the Stock Price Conundrum

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the captivating world of genetically modified corn and its peculiar connection to the stock price of Trip.com Group. Utilizing data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2004 to 2023. Astonishingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.8326389 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 emerged from our investigation.

The correlation between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the fluctuations in Trip.com Group's stock price has raised eyebrows and led to an intriguing journey of inquiry. While the pervasive nature of genetically modified corn undoubtedly warrants attention, the unexpected link to a stock price trajectory adds a twist of enigma to this research endeavor.

In unraveling this enigmatic relationship, we shed light on the potential implications and ripple effects that may arise from the intersection of these seemingly disparate realms. Through our dry but witty exploration, we offer a whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective on the interconnectedness of agriculture and finance, demonstrating that even the most unexpected pairings can unveil kernels of truth.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Within the labyrinthine realm of agricultural biotechnology and the capricious landscape of financial markets, a peculiar correlation has emerged, entwining genetically modified corn with the stock price trajectory of Trip.com Group. The seemingly incongruous pairing of agricultural innovation and stock market fluctuations has evoked both intrigue and incredulity among scholars and enthusiasts alike.
We embarked on this research endeavor to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms in corn cultivation and the unpredictable undulations in Trip.com Group's stock price. Akin to a scientific detective, we aimed to unearth clues and discern the hidden threads that weave these seemingly disparate domains together.
Amidst the chorus of statistical analyses and the fervent pursuit of causality, we found ourselves lured into an intellectual tango, dancing between the intricacies of crop genetics and the caprices of market sentiments. As we unraveled the data, a peculiar symphony of numbers and variables echoed through our analytical minds, both befuddling and beguiling us with their numerical dance.
Our dry but witty exploration seeks to uplift the drab veil of traditional research, injecting a dash of levity into the otherwise dour world of scholarly inquiry. The whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective that we offer promises to illuminate the otherwise dimly lit corridors of interconnectedness between agriculture and finance.
As we venture forth into the heart of our analysis, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a lighthearted yet astute journey through the conundrum of genetically modified corn and Trip.com Group's stock price. For, as we shall soon reveal, even the most unexpected pairings can unveil kernels of truth, nestled within the convoluted fields of data and analysis.

[[RESULTS]]
A correlation coefficient of 0.8326389 between the adoption of genetically modified organisms in corn cultivation and the stock price fluctuations of Trip.com Group was unearthed from our extensive analysis. The lofty r-squared value of 0.6932875 further reinforced this robust relationship, signifying that approximately 69.3% of the variability in Trip.com Group's stock price can be attributed to the adoption of GMOs in corn. The p-value of less than 0.01 reinforced the statistical significance of this correlation, leaving no room for doubt in the veracity of this compelling connection.
The figure (Fig. 1) depicts a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between the adoption of genetically modified corn and the oscillations in Trip.com Group's stock price. This visual representation serves as an incontrovertible testament to the robustness of our findings, portraying a captivating dance of data points that speaks volumes about the intertwined fate of these seemingly disparate entities. The measurable impact of genetically modified corn on Trip.com Group's stock price gyrations is as clear as day, illustrating that the kernels of truth we seek are indeed firmly rooted in the web of statistics and analysis.
Our research endeavor has peeled back the layers of enigma shrouding this unexpected relationship, illuminating the peculiar connection between agricultural biotechnology and the fickle landscape of financial markets. The complex interplay of genetic modification and stock price undulations has contributed a splash of intrigue to the academic tableau, inspiring a whimsical yet perceptive journey through the interstitial realms of agriculture and finance. This unexpected union has reminded us that, in the world of scholarly inquiry, even the most unassuming variables can unveil kernels of truth, nestled amidst the labyrinth of data and analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

Our foray into the labyrinth of genetically modified corn and its unexpected dalliance with the stock price of Trip.com Group has left us both amused and bemused. The robust correlation we have unearthed, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8326389 and a statistically significant p-value, serves as a testament to the undeniable allure of statistical sorcery. This enigmatic relationship has added an unexpected twist to the scholarly landscape, bringing to light the whimsical dance of data points that has both captivated and confounded us.

As we bid adieu to this peculiar pairing, we are compelled to acknowledge the beguiling nature of statistical analysis and the tantalizing allure of uncovering unsuspected connections. Our exploration has elucidated the fascinating interplay between agriculture and finance, demonstrating that even the most unconventional pairings can sprout kernels of truth when viewed through the lens of data and analysis.

In conclusion, we assert that this study has shed light on the intriguing intertwining of genetically modified corn and Trip.com Group's stock price, leaving no cob unturned in our inquiry. Therefore, we firmly declare that no further research is warranted in this curious realm, as the kernels of truth have been diligently plucked from the fertile grounds of statistical exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Kernels of Truth: Genetically Modified Corn and the Stock Price Conundrum. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Economics and Ethical Dilemmas


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Kernels of Truth: Genetically Modified Corn and the Stock Price Conundrum. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agricultural Innovation and Policy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Kernels of Truth: Genetically Modified Corn and the Stock Price Conundrum with an abstract of This paper delves into the captivating world of genetically modified corn and its peculiar connection to the stock price of Trip.com Group. Utilizing data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2004 to 2023. Astonishingly, a correlation coefficient of 0.8326389 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 emerged from our investigation.
The correlation between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the fluctuations in Trip.com Group's stock price has raised eyebrows and led to an intriguing journey of inquiry. While the pervasive nature of genetically modified corn undoubtedly warrants attention, the unexpected link to a stock price trajectory adds a twist of enigma to this research endeavor.
In unraveling this enigmatic relationship, we shed light on the potential implications and ripple effects that may arise from the intersection of these seemingly disparate realms. Through our dry but witty exploration, we offer a whimsical yet thought-provoking perspective on the interconnectedness of agriculture and finance, demonstrating that even the most unexpected pairings can unveil kernels of truth.

ChatGPT:

genetically modified corn, GMOs, Trip.com Group stock price, USDA data, LSEG Analytics, corn cultivation, stock price correlation, agriculture finance intersection, ripple effects, GMO adoption, enigmatic relationship, genetically modified corn implications

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in United States genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn

Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Trip.com Group (TCOM) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM)

Correlation r = 0.8326389 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6932875 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 69.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.2E-6. 0.0000052387894632175890000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.00052% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 190,884 random variables You don't actually need 190 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.62, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn (GMO corn %)69152840464749527176777677808079818182
Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM) (Stock price)2.122.883.667.8814.495.9818.4320.211211.7524.782344.9940.8845.126.4134.9433.8424.5335.01




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6,9,15,28,40,46,47,49,52,71,76,77,76,77,80,80,79,81,81,82,])
array_2 = np.array([2.12,2.88,3.66,7.88,14.49,5.98,18.43,20.21,12,11.75,24.78,23,44.99,40.88,45.1,26.41,34.94,33.84,24.53,35.01,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn"
array_2_name = "Trip.com Group's stock price (TCOM)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 1964 · Black Variable ID: 752 · Red Variable ID: 1889
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0