about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,946 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Butter consumption and the second variable is Total Revenue of the NFL Teams.  The chart goes from 2001 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As butter consumption increased, so did the demand for football games, leading to higher ticket sales and TV revenue. It looks like all that extra butter was really spreading the bread for the NFL teams! The correlation is clear - as buttered popcorn and buttery fingers became game day essentials, the NFL teams raked in the dough.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie, depicting a group of vibrant characters cheering and enjoying popcorn with butter at a bustling stadium. The background showcases banners displaying the teams' logos, while the announcer's voice booms over the speakers, contributing to the electric atmosphere. The digital board in the background steadily climbs with the event's revenue, adding to the sense of excitement and grandeur. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Butter consumption and Total Revenue of the NFL Teams. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Minimalism An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Brutalism Vaporwave
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Butter consumption and Total Revenue of the NFL Teams together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A group of people watching a football game at a stadium, enjoying popcorn with butter on top. In the background, the teams' logos are displayed on large banners, with the announcer's voice booming over the speakers as the total revenue for the event steadily climbs on the digital board.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: A group of people watching a football game at a stadium, enjoying popcorn with butter on top. In the background, the teams' logos are displayed on large banners, with the announcer's voice booming over the speakers as the total revenue for the event steadily climbs on the digital board. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie, depicting a group of vibrant characters cheering and enjoying popcorn with butter at a bustling stadium. The background showcases banners displaying the teams' logos, while the announcer's voice booms over the speakers, contributing to the electric atmosphere. The digital board in the background steadily climbs with the event's revenue, adding to the sense of excitement and grandeur.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Butter consumption caused Total Revenue of the NFL Teams to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Spreading Success: Uncovering the Butterly Connection Between Butter Consumption and Total Revenue of NFL Teams

The Journal of Eclectic Economics and Culinary Sciences

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Total Revenue of the NFL Teams. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9442177 and p < 0.01 for 2001 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Spreading Success: Uncovering the Butterly Connection Between Butter Consumption and Total Revenue of NFL Teams"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study churns out the fascinating findings on the butterly connection between butter consumption and the total revenue of National Football League (NFL) teams. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a thorough analysis from 2001 to 2020. Our results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9442177 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong relationship between butter consumption and the financial success of NFL teams. This paper offers a fresh perspective on the influence of butter on the economic performance of professional sports teams, and it raises questions about the potential impact of dairy products on the gridiron.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Total Revenue of the NFL Teams. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Spreading Success: Uncovering the Butterly Connection Between Butter Consumption and Total Revenue of NFL Teams"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study churns out the fascinating findings on the butterly connection between butter consumption and the total revenue of National Football League (NFL) teams. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a thorough analysis from 2001 to 2020. Our results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9442177 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong relationship between butter consumption and the financial success of NFL teams. This paper offers a fresh perspective on the influence of butter on the economic performance of professional sports teams, and it raises questions about the potential impact of dairy products on the gridiron.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Butter, the creamy spread that makes everything better, has been a staple of human diets for centuries. Whether it's slathered on toast, used in baking, or melted over a steaming bowl of popcorn, butter has a way of adding a touch of richness to our lives. Beyond its culinary allure, some may find it implausible that this beloved dairy product could have any bearing on the financial success of professional sports teams, particularly those in the gladiatorial arena of American football. However, as unlikely as it may seem, the connection between butter consumption and the total revenue of National Football League (NFL) teams is not merely a flight of dairy fancy; rather, it is a pressing matter that our research seeks to unravel.

The intersection of butter and the NFL may prompt quizzical looks and raised eyebrows, but it is precisely at this quirky crossroads that we embarked on our investigation. The hypothesis that butter consumption, often associated with indulgence and comfort, could impact the fortunes of sports franchises may seem, on its delectable surface, to be a mere flight of whimsy. However, as we delved into the depths of the data from both the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, we uncovered a correlation that was as surprising as a pat of butter on a Flapjack Fryderer's fastball (a well-known American football move, to be sure).

While our initial foray into this uncharted territory may have seemed, well, "butterly" predictable (forgive the pun, we couldn't resist), the robust statistical analysis that followed has uncovered a compelling relationship between butter consumption and the financial performance of NFL teams. Yes, you heard that right: the spreadable, delectable essence of butter may hold the key to a team's fiscal prosperity – a revelation that may prompt more than a few heads to turn (or perhaps, to churn?).

As we present our findings, it is our hope that the reader will not only be tickled by the unexpected nature of our discovery but also be compelled to contemplate the implications of our results on the larger intersection of dairy products and professional sports. So, buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on a butter-laden journey through the realm of NFL team finances, with more than a hint of whimsy and wonder. After all, in the words of an anonymous philosopher, "Life is short. Spread butter." And spread, we did – the tender, creamy influence of this beloved dairy staple, to the unlikeliest of places: the world of NFL revenue.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Total Revenue of the NFL Teams. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Spreading Success: Uncovering the Butterly Connection Between Butter Consumption and Total Revenue of NFL Teams"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study churns out the fascinating findings on the butterly connection between butter consumption and the total revenue of National Football League (NFL) teams. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a thorough analysis from 2001 to 2020. Our results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9442177 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong relationship between butter consumption and the financial success of NFL teams. This paper offers a fresh perspective on the influence of butter on the economic performance of professional sports teams, and it raises questions about the potential impact of dairy products on the gridiron.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Butter, the creamy spread that makes everything better, has been a staple of human diets for centuries. Whether it's slathered on toast, used in baking, or melted over a steaming bowl of popcorn, butter has a way of adding a touch of richness to our lives. Beyond its culinary allure, some may find it implausible that this beloved dairy product could have any bearing on the financial success of professional sports teams, particularly those in the gladiatorial arena of American football. However, as unlikely as it may seem, the connection between butter consumption and the total revenue of National Football League (NFL) teams is not merely a flight of dairy fancy; rather, it is a pressing matter that our research seeks to unravel.
The intersection of butter and the NFL may prompt quizzical looks and raised eyebrows, but it is precisely at this quirky crossroads that we embarked on our investigation. The hypothesis that butter consumption, often associated with indulgence and comfort, could impact the fortunes of sports franchises may seem, on its delectable surface, to be a mere flight of whimsy. However, as we delved into the depths of the data from both the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, we uncovered a correlation that was as surprising as a pat of butter on a Flapjack Fryderer's fastball (a well-known American football move, to be sure).
While our initial foray into this uncharted territory may have seemed, well, "butterly" predictable (forgive the pun, we couldn't resist), the robust statistical analysis that followed has uncovered a compelling relationship between butter consumption and the financial performance of NFL teams. Yes, you heard that right: the spreadable, delectable essence of butter may hold the key to a team's fiscal prosperity – a revelation that may prompt more than a few heads to turn (or perhaps, to churn?).
As we present our findings, it is our hope that the reader will not only be tickled by the unexpected nature of our discovery but also be compelled to contemplate the implications of our results on the larger intersection of dairy products and professional sports. So, buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on a butter-laden journey through the realm of NFL team finances, with more than a hint of whimsy and wonder. After all, in the words of an anonymous philosopher, "Life is short. Spread butter." And spread, we did – the tender, creamy influence of this beloved dairy staple, to the unlikeliest of places: the world of NFL revenue.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find that butter consumption has been historically associated with indulgence and comfort, and not with the hard-nosed world of professional sports finance. However, as we delve deeper into the annals of literature, an intriguing juxtaposition emerges. In "Doe's study," the authors suggest a potential link between dietary habits and financial success, with a focus on the consumption of luxury food items. Here, we start to see the glimmer of a connection between butter and the economic performance of industries that extend beyond the culinary domain, laying the groundwork for our investigation into its impact on NFL teams.

Moving beyond the confines of traditional literature, we draw inspiration from non-fiction works such as "The Economics of Taste" by David M. Levy and Sandra J. Peart, and "The NFL Business Model" by Daniel Kaplan. Though not directly related to butter consumption, these texts provided valuable insights into the dynamics of consumer behavior, market trends, and financial strategies within the sports industry. The juxtaposition of these serious and studious sources with the lighthearted nature of our investigation may seem as incongruous as spreading butter on a hot pretzel, but it serves to underscore the multidimensionality of our research.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, we turn to "Butter: A Rich History" by Elaine Khosrova and "The Butter Battle Book" by Dr. Seuss. While the former offers a whimsical yet informative exploration of butter's cultural significance, the latter, in its allegorical depiction of a conflict over butter-side-up versus butter-side-down, piqued our interest in the unconventional manifestations of butter-related quandaries. These literary diversions provided much-needed levity in our quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between dairy delight and touchdown dollars.

Navigating further into unexpected territories, we explore the influence of cartoons and children's shows on our contemplation of butter's impact on NFL revenue. The vibrant imagery of "SpongeBob SquarePants" and the butter-obsessed antics of iconic characters such as Mr. Krabs and Patrick Star have lent a whimsical hue to our endeavor, evoking playful ruminations on the potential intersections of maritime whimsy and football finance.

In synthesizing findings from these diverse sources, we acknowledge that the scholarly pursuit of understanding the butterly connection between butter consumption and the total revenue of NFL teams has taken us on a tantalizing, often absurd, and undeniably delightful journey. As we embark on our own analysis, we remain keenly aware of the seamless interweaving of the serious and the whimsical, the scholarly and the lighthearted, in the pursuit of uncovering the butterly truths that may lie hidden amidst the gridiron thrills and spreads of leisurely repasts.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Total Revenue of the NFL Teams. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista . You used data from 2001 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Spreading Success: Uncovering the Butterly Connection Between Butter Consumption and Total Revenue of NFL Teams"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study churns out the fascinating findings on the butterly connection between butter consumption and the total revenue of National Football League (NFL) teams. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a thorough analysis from 2001 to 2020. Our results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9442177 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong relationship between butter consumption and the financial success of NFL teams. This paper offers a fresh perspective on the influence of butter on the economic performance of professional sports teams, and it raises questions about the potential impact of dairy products on the gridiron.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Butter, the creamy spread that makes everything better, has been a staple of human diets for centuries. Whether it's slathered on toast, used in baking, or melted over a steaming bowl of popcorn, butter has a way of adding a touch of richness to our lives. Beyond its culinary allure, some may find it implausible that this beloved dairy product could have any bearing on the financial success of professional sports teams, particularly those in the gladiatorial arena of American football. However, as unlikely as it may seem, the connection between butter consumption and the total revenue of National Football League (NFL) teams is not merely a flight of dairy fancy; rather, it is a pressing matter that our research seeks to unravel.
The intersection of butter and the NFL may prompt quizzical looks and raised eyebrows, but it is precisely at this quirky crossroads that we embarked on our investigation. The hypothesis that butter consumption, often associated with indulgence and comfort, could impact the fortunes of sports franchises may seem, on its delectable surface, to be a mere flight of whimsy. However, as we delved into the depths of the data from both the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, we uncovered a correlation that was as surprising as a pat of butter on a Flapjack Fryderer's fastball (a well-known American football move, to be sure).
While our initial foray into this uncharted territory may have seemed, well, "butterly" predictable (forgive the pun, we couldn't resist), the robust statistical analysis that followed has uncovered a compelling relationship between butter consumption and the financial performance of NFL teams. Yes, you heard that right: the spreadable, delectable essence of butter may hold the key to a team's fiscal prosperity – a revelation that may prompt more than a few heads to turn (or perhaps, to churn?).
As we present our findings, it is our hope that the reader will not only be tickled by the unexpected nature of our discovery but also be compelled to contemplate the implications of our results on the larger intersection of dairy products and professional sports. So, buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on a butter-laden journey through the realm of NFL team finances, with more than a hint of whimsy and wonder. After all, in the words of an anonymous philosopher, "Life is short. Spread butter." And spread, we did – the tender, creamy influence of this beloved dairy staple, to the unlikeliest of places: the world of NFL revenue.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the butterly connection between butter consumption and the total revenue of National Football League (NFL) teams, our research team embarked on a rigorous and, dare we say, butter-laden methodology that incorporated data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista. Our journey into this uncharted territory of dairy-infused sports economics began by meticulously gathering annual butter consumption data and total revenue figures for all NFL teams from the years 2001 to 2020.

The first step in our convoluted methodology was to spread our data collection efforts far and wide across the internet, akin to the way butter lovingly envelops a freshly baked scone. During this process, we encountered a veritable cornucopia of sources, but we resolutely focused on the reliable and robust data provided by the USDA and Statista, akin to the way a discerning chef selects the finest churned cream for a delectable batch of butter.

Once our treasure trove of data was assembled, we churned through the numbers with a statistical fervor rivaling that of a butter-making festival, employing the formidable tools of correlation analysis and regression modeling. Our aim was to ascertain whether there was a statistically significant relationship between butter consumption and the total revenue of NFL teams, and whether this connection was more than just a mere "butterly" coincidence.

We initially conducted a comprehensive correlation analysis, allowing us to gauge the strength and direction of the relationship between butter consumption and total revenue. As we sifted through the data, we couldn't help but marvel at the correlation coefficient of 0.9442177, which surpassed our wildest expectations and left us churning with excitement. Furthermore, the associated p-value of less than 0.01 bolstered our confidence in the robustness of our findings, affirming that the observed relationship between butter consumption and NFL team revenue was no mere fluke – it was as solid and substantial as a well-whisked batch of buttercream frosting.

In addition to correlation analysis, we harnessed the power of regression modeling to delve deeper into the nuances of this creamy correlation. Through this method, we sought to tease out the specific impact of butter consumption on the total revenue of NFL teams, unraveling the intricate ways in which this dairy delight may influence the financial fortunes of sports franchises.

Our methodology, while quirky and unorthodox in its subject matter, adhered to the highest standards of statistical rigor and analytical precision, ensuring that our findings were as robust as a pat of well-chilled butter. As we spread open the pages of our methodology, we invite the reader to savor the unexpected twists and turns of our research journey, all the while keeping in mind that, as the saying goes, "In butter, we trust!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Total Revenue of the NFL Teams. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista .

For the time period 2001 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9442177, r-squared of 0.8915470, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Spreading Success: Uncovering the Butterly Connection Between Butter Consumption and Total Revenue of NFL Teams"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study churns out the fascinating findings on the butterly connection between butter consumption and the total revenue of National Football League (NFL) teams. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a thorough analysis from 2001 to 2020. Our results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9442177 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong relationship between butter consumption and the financial success of NFL teams. This paper offers a fresh perspective on the influence of butter on the economic performance of professional sports teams, and it raises questions about the potential impact of dairy products on the gridiron.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Butter, the creamy spread that makes everything better, has been a staple of human diets for centuries. Whether it's slathered on toast, used in baking, or melted over a steaming bowl of popcorn, butter has a way of adding a touch of richness to our lives. Beyond its culinary allure, some may find it implausible that this beloved dairy product could have any bearing on the financial success of professional sports teams, particularly those in the gladiatorial arena of American football. However, as unlikely as it may seem, the connection between butter consumption and the total revenue of National Football League (NFL) teams is not merely a flight of dairy fancy; rather, it is a pressing matter that our research seeks to unravel.
The intersection of butter and the NFL may prompt quizzical looks and raised eyebrows, but it is precisely at this quirky crossroads that we embarked on our investigation. The hypothesis that butter consumption, often associated with indulgence and comfort, could impact the fortunes of sports franchises may seem, on its delectable surface, to be a mere flight of whimsy. However, as we delved into the depths of the data from both the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, we uncovered a correlation that was as surprising as a pat of butter on a Flapjack Fryderer's fastball (a well-known American football move, to be sure).
While our initial foray into this uncharted territory may have seemed, well, "butterly" predictable (forgive the pun, we couldn't resist), the robust statistical analysis that followed has uncovered a compelling relationship between butter consumption and the financial performance of NFL teams. Yes, you heard that right: the spreadable, delectable essence of butter may hold the key to a team's fiscal prosperity – a revelation that may prompt more than a few heads to turn (or perhaps, to churn?).
As we present our findings, it is our hope that the reader will not only be tickled by the unexpected nature of our discovery but also be compelled to contemplate the implications of our results on the larger intersection of dairy products and professional sports. So, buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on a butter-laden journey through the realm of NFL team finances, with more than a hint of whimsy and wonder. After all, in the words of an anonymous philosopher, "Life is short. Spread butter." And spread, we did – the tender, creamy influence of this beloved dairy staple, to the unlikeliest of places: the world of NFL revenue.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of our data from 2001 to 2020 revealed a remarkable correlation between butter consumption and the total revenue of NFL teams. The correlation coefficient of 0.9442177 indicates a strong positive relationship, suggesting that as butter consumption increased, so did the total revenue of NFL teams. This connection was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8915470, indicating that approximately 89.15% of the variability in the total revenue of NFL teams can be explained by the variability in butter consumption.

Our findings were bolstered by the compelling evidence of a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing strong support for the hypothesis that butter consumption is positively associated with the financial success of NFL teams. Indeed, the robustness of this relationship was vividly illustrated in the scatterplot (Fig. 1), which graphically depicts the strong correlation between butter consumption and total revenue of NFL teams. The points on the plot are as tightly packed as a well-formed pat of butter, reaffirming the coherence of the association.

Our results not only underscore the intriguing nature of this butterly connection but also invite a further exploration of the potential mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. The butterly effect, it seems, extends beyond chaos theory and into the realm of professional sports economics. While we may jest about the link between butter and NFL revenue, the statistical rigor of our analysis underscores the significance of this finding and piques one's curiosity about the uncharted influences on the financial performance of sports franchises.

These findings prompt a reconsideration of the broader implications of dietary factors on the economic outcomes of professional sports, and the proverbial ball is now in the court of future research to churn out further insights into this unexpected yet captivating relationship.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Total Revenue of the NFL Teams. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Spreading Success: Uncovering the Butterly Connection Between Butter Consumption and Total Revenue of NFL Teams"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study churns out the fascinating findings on the butterly connection between butter consumption and the total revenue of National Football League (NFL) teams. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a thorough analysis from 2001 to 2020. Our results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9442177 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong relationship between butter consumption and the financial success of NFL teams. This paper offers a fresh perspective on the influence of butter on the economic performance of professional sports teams, and it raises questions about the potential impact of dairy products on the gridiron.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that butter consumption has been historically associated with indulgence and comfort, and not with the hard-nosed world of professional sports finance. However, as we delve deeper into the annals of literature, an intriguing juxtaposition emerges. In "Doe's study," the authors suggest a potential link between dietary habits and financial success, with a focus on the consumption of luxury food items. Here, we start to see the glimmer of a connection between butter and the economic performance of industries that extend beyond the culinary domain, laying the groundwork for our investigation into its impact on NFL teams.
Moving beyond the confines of traditional literature, we draw inspiration from non-fiction works such as "The Economics of Taste" by David M. Levy and Sandra J. Peart, and "The NFL Business Model" by Daniel Kaplan. Though not directly related to butter consumption, these texts provided valuable insights into the dynamics of consumer behavior, market trends, and financial strategies within the sports industry. The juxtaposition of these serious and studious sources with the lighthearted nature of our investigation may seem as incongruous as spreading butter on a hot pretzel, but it serves to underscore the multidimensionality of our research.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, we turn to "Butter: A Rich History" by Elaine Khosrova and "The Butter Battle Book" by Dr. Seuss. While the former offers a whimsical yet informative exploration of butter's cultural significance, the latter, in its allegorical depiction of a conflict over butter-side-up versus butter-side-down, piqued our interest in the unconventional manifestations of butter-related quandaries. These literary diversions provided much-needed levity in our quest to unravel the enigmatic connection between dairy delight and touchdown dollars.
Navigating further into unexpected territories, we explore the influence of cartoons and children's shows on our contemplation of butter's impact on NFL revenue. The vibrant imagery of "SpongeBob SquarePants" and the butter-obsessed antics of iconic characters such as Mr. Krabs and Patrick Star have lent a whimsical hue to our endeavor, evoking playful ruminations on the potential intersections of maritime whimsy and football finance.
In synthesizing findings from these diverse sources, we acknowledge that the scholarly pursuit of understanding the butterly connection between butter consumption and the total revenue of NFL teams has taken us on a tantalizing, often absurd, and undeniably delightful journey. As we embark on our own analysis, we remain keenly aware of the seamless interweaving of the serious and the whimsical, the scholarly and the lighthearted, in the pursuit of uncovering the butterly truths that may lie hidden amidst the gridiron thrills and spreads of leisurely repasts.


[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of our data from 2001 to 2020 revealed a remarkable correlation between butter consumption and the total revenue of NFL teams. The correlation coefficient of 0.9442177 indicates a strong positive relationship, suggesting that as butter consumption increased, so did the total revenue of NFL teams. This connection was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8915470, indicating that approximately 89.15% of the variability in the total revenue of NFL teams can be explained by the variability in butter consumption.
Our findings were bolstered by the compelling evidence of a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing strong support for the hypothesis that butter consumption is positively associated with the financial success of NFL teams. Indeed, the robustness of this relationship was vividly illustrated in the scatterplot (Fig. 1), which graphically depicts the strong correlation between butter consumption and total revenue of NFL teams. The points on the plot are as tightly packed as a well-formed pat of butter, reaffirming the coherence of the association.
Our results not only underscore the intriguing nature of this butterly connection but also invite a further exploration of the potential mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. The butterly effect, it seems, extends beyond chaos theory and into the realm of professional sports economics. While we may jest about the link between butter and NFL revenue, the statistical rigor of our analysis underscores the significance of this finding and piques one's curiosity about the uncharted influences on the financial performance of sports franchises.
These findings prompt a reconsideration of the broader implications of dietary factors on the economic outcomes of professional sports, and the proverbial ball is now in the court of future research to churn out further insights into this unexpected yet captivating relationship.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The butterly remarkable findings of our study have unmasked the surprising connection between butter consumption and the total revenue of NFL teams. Our results have provided compelling evidence that as butter consumption increases, so does the financial success of NFL teams. While the notion of butter influencing the economic performance of professional sports teams may seem as outlandish as the sight of a linebacker twirling gracefully in a tutu, the statistical rigor of our analysis substantiates this unanticipated association.

Weaving through the tangy flavors of literature, the quirky relationship between butter and financial success surfaces as a delicious surprise, akin to finding an unexpected dollop of honey in a buttermilk biscuit. Our findings align with prior research that hints at the potential link between dietary habits and economic outcomes. The whimsical inspiration drawn from fiction, such as Dr. Seuss' "The Butter Battle Book," illuminates the fanciful yet thought-provoking nature of our investigation. The butterly connection is not only a whimsical muse but also a statistical reality, as our analysis supported the peculiar hunches gleaned from unconventional sources.

The robust correlation coefficient and significant p-value in our study mirror a perfectly executed spiral pass; they demonstrate the precision and strength of the relationship between butter consumption and NFL team revenue. Our findings are as solid as a well-chilled pat of butter, serving as a delicious reminder of the unexpected flavors that can emerge from the statistical kitchen.

The implications of our results are not just confined to the intersection of butter and NFL revenue; they extend to the broader realm of the influence of dietary factors on the economic performance of professional sports. Just as the careful addition of butter can transform a bland dish into a delectable feast, our study suggests that the seemingly inconsequential variable of butter consumption can significantly impact the financial fortunes of NFL teams.

As we contemplate the impact of butter on NFL revenue, we are also left pondering the potential avenues for future research to churn out further insights into this curiously creamy connection. The butterly effect has wedged itself into the narrative of professional sports finance, reminding us that beneath the seemingly straightforward statistics lies a delightful layer of unexpected influence waiting to be uncovered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Total Revenue of the NFL Teams. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Spreading Success: Uncovering the Butterly Connection Between Butter Consumption and Total Revenue of NFL Teams"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study churns out the fascinating findings on the butterly connection between butter consumption and the total revenue of National Football League (NFL) teams. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a thorough analysis from 2001 to 2020. Our results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9442177 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong relationship between butter consumption and the financial success of NFL teams. This paper offers a fresh perspective on the influence of butter on the economic performance of professional sports teams, and it raises questions about the potential impact of dairy products on the gridiron.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Butter, the creamy spread that makes everything better, has been a staple of human diets for centuries. Whether it's slathered on toast, used in baking, or melted over a steaming bowl of popcorn, butter has a way of adding a touch of richness to our lives. Beyond its culinary allure, some may find it implausible that this beloved dairy product could have any bearing on the financial success of professional sports teams, particularly those in the gladiatorial arena of American football. However, as unlikely as it may seem, the connection between butter consumption and the total revenue of National Football League (NFL) teams is not merely a flight of dairy fancy; rather, it is a pressing matter that our research seeks to unravel.
The intersection of butter and the NFL may prompt quizzical looks and raised eyebrows, but it is precisely at this quirky crossroads that we embarked on our investigation. The hypothesis that butter consumption, often associated with indulgence and comfort, could impact the fortunes of sports franchises may seem, on its delectable surface, to be a mere flight of whimsy. However, as we delved into the depths of the data from both the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, we uncovered a correlation that was as surprising as a pat of butter on a Flapjack Fryderer's fastball (a well-known American football move, to be sure).
While our initial foray into this uncharted territory may have seemed, well, "butterly" predictable (forgive the pun, we couldn't resist), the robust statistical analysis that followed has uncovered a compelling relationship between butter consumption and the financial performance of NFL teams. Yes, you heard that right: the spreadable, delectable essence of butter may hold the key to a team's fiscal prosperity – a revelation that may prompt more than a few heads to turn (or perhaps, to churn?).
As we present our findings, it is our hope that the reader will not only be tickled by the unexpected nature of our discovery but also be compelled to contemplate the implications of our results on the larger intersection of dairy products and professional sports. So, buckle up, dear reader, as we embark on a butter-laden journey through the realm of NFL team finances, with more than a hint of whimsy and wonder. After all, in the words of an anonymous philosopher, "Life is short. Spread butter." And spread, we did – the tender, creamy influence of this beloved dairy staple, to the unlikeliest of places: the world of NFL revenue.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of our data from 2001 to 2020 revealed a remarkable correlation between butter consumption and the total revenue of NFL teams. The correlation coefficient of 0.9442177 indicates a strong positive relationship, suggesting that as butter consumption increased, so did the total revenue of NFL teams. This connection was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8915470, indicating that approximately 89.15% of the variability in the total revenue of NFL teams can be explained by the variability in butter consumption.
Our findings were bolstered by the compelling evidence of a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing strong support for the hypothesis that butter consumption is positively associated with the financial success of NFL teams. Indeed, the robustness of this relationship was vividly illustrated in the scatterplot (Fig. 1), which graphically depicts the strong correlation between butter consumption and total revenue of NFL teams. The points on the plot are as tightly packed as a well-formed pat of butter, reaffirming the coherence of the association.
Our results not only underscore the intriguing nature of this butterly connection but also invite a further exploration of the potential mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. The butterly effect, it seems, extends beyond chaos theory and into the realm of professional sports economics. While we may jest about the link between butter and NFL revenue, the statistical rigor of our analysis underscores the significance of this finding and piques one's curiosity about the uncharted influences on the financial performance of sports franchises.
These findings prompt a reconsideration of the broader implications of dietary factors on the economic outcomes of professional sports, and the proverbial ball is now in the court of future research to churn out further insights into this unexpected yet captivating relationship.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a spread-worthy revelation regarding the unexpectedly deep connection between butter consumption and the financial success of NFL teams. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9442177 and the r-squared value of 0.8915470 point to a relationship as robust as a well-whipped buttercream frosting. Indeed, our findings suggest that as butter consumption increased, so did the total revenue of NFL teams, leaving us to ponder whether the secret to building a championship team lies not only in training and strategy but also in the creamy goodness of dairy.

Our investigation has uncovered a correlation so strong that it might just butter your mind. We acknowledge that the idea of butter influencing NFL revenue may initially seem as absurd as American football players performing ballet, but the evidence cannot be margarined – the data speaks for itself. As we carefully spread through the numbers, our results emerged as clear as a pat of butter on a warm English muffin.

Yet, as much as we have relished these findings, we must acknowledge the need for further research in this area. While our study has churned up a tantalizing conjecture, we must resist the temptation to spread ourselves too thin. Our findings beg for follow-up research that delves into the underlying mechanisms driving this butterly connection. Perhaps future studies could explore whether the type of butter matters – does unsalted butter lead to less revenue? Or perhaps delve into the intriguing question of whether the act of spreading butter itself correlates with touchdown success rates. The possibilities are as endless as a well-stocked dairy aisle.

To quote the illustrious Julia Child, "With enough butter, anything is good." In the case of NFL revenue, it seems that this sentiment rings true. Our research, while undeniably flavorful, represents just the beginning of a deeper exploration into the intersection of dairy products and professional sports. The butterly effect is real, folks – and it's leaving its unmistakable imprint on the financial performance of NFL teams.

We assert with buttery confidence that no further research is needed in this area. After all, we have sufficiently buttered up the statistical significance of this remarkable relationship – it's time for others to spread their wings and churn out new discoveries in the unexplored pasture of butter-infused sports economics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Spreading Success: Uncovering the Butterly Connection Between Butter Consumption and Total Revenue of NFL Teams. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eclectic Economics and Culinary Sciences


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Spreading Success: Uncovering the Butterly Connection Between Butter Consumption and Total Revenue of NFL Teams. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Dairy Economics and Sports Performance


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Spreading Success: Uncovering the Butterly Connection Between Butter Consumption and Total Revenue of NFL Teams with an abstract of This study churns out the fascinating findings on the butterly connection between butter consumption and the total revenue of National Football League (NFL) teams. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a thorough analysis from 2001 to 2020. Our results revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9442177 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong relationship between butter consumption and the financial success of NFL teams. This paper offers a fresh perspective on the influence of butter on the economic performance of professional sports teams, and it raises questions about the potential impact of dairy products on the gridiron.

ChatGPT:

butter consumption, NFL teams revenue, correlation coefficient, USDA data, Statista, professional sports teams, influence of butter, dairy products, economic performance, gridiron

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Butter consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Butter in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Butter consumption

Total Revenue of the NFL Teams
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Total Revenue of the NFL Teams

Correlation r = 0.9442177 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8915470 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total Revenue of the NFL Teams) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Butter consumption) over the 20 years from 2001 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.05E-10. 0.0000000004052940739402776000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 4.05E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,467,344,243 random variables You don't actually need 2 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.86, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Butter consumption (Pounds per person)4.34.44.54.54.54.74.7554.95.45.55.55.55.65.75.766.26.3
Total Revenue of the NFL Teams (Billion US Dollars)4.284.945.336.036.166.547.097.578.028.358.829.179.5811.0912.1613.1613.6814.4815.2612.2




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.3,4.4,4.5,4.5,4.5,4.7,4.7,5,5,4.9,5.4,5.5,5.5,5.5,5.6,5.7,5.7,6,6.2,6.3,])
array_2 = np.array([4.28,4.94,5.33,6.03,6.16,6.54,7.09,7.57,8.02,8.35,8.82,9.17,9.58,11.09,12.16,13.16,13.68,14.48,15.26,12.2,])
array_1_name = "Butter consumption"
array_2_name = "Total Revenue of the NFL Teams"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 1946 · Black Variable ID: 557 · Red Variable ID: 410
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0