about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,893 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is UFO sightings in Arkansas and the second variable is Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion.  The chart goes from 1979 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The influx of extraterrestrial activity in Arkansas has led to a surge in demand for space-themed food, including rocket dogs and cosmic canines. As a result, the local Nathan's hot dog champion has been training by chowing down on an astronomical amount of hotdogs in preparation for a potential intergalactic hot dog eating showdown. It seems the UFO sightings have really launched his appetite to infinity and beyond!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a vast field in Arkansas, bathed in the soft glow of moonlight. In the center of the scene, a group of people stands in awe, their faces illuminated by the surreal neon lights emanating from a hovering UFO above. The night sky is a canvas of twinkling stars, with the UFO casting a radiant glow. In the foreground, the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition stands proudly, adorned with a winner's sash. Surrounding the champion is a towering stack of empty hot dog buns, a testament to their astonishing feat of consuming a remarkable number of hot dogs with unwavering determination and skill. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: UFO sightings in Arkansas and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Realistic High-tech Parallax art Charcoal Hyper-realistic
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both UFO sightings in Arkansas and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a field in Arkansas, a group of people are gazing up at the night sky in awe as a UFO with neon lights hovers above. In the forefront, the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, wearing a winner's sash, is surrounded by a towering stack of empty hot dog buns, having consumed an astonishing number of hot dogs with determination and skill.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a field in Arkansas, a group of people are gazing up at the night sky in awe as a UFO with neon lights hovers above. In the forefront, the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, wearing a winner's sash, is surrounded by a towering stack of empty hot dog buns, having consumed an astonishing number of hot dogs with determination and skill. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a vast field in Arkansas, bathed in the soft glow of moonlight. In the center of the scene, a group of people stands in awe, their faces illuminated by the surreal neon lights emanating from a hovering UFO above. The night sky is a canvas of twinkling stars, with the UFO casting a radiant glow. In the foreground, the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition stands proudly, adorned with a winner's sash. Surrounding the champion is a towering stack of empty hot dog buns, a testament to their astonishing feat of consuming a remarkable number of hot dogs with unwavering determination and skill.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in UFO sightings in Arkansas positively influenced Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Arkansas UFO Flap: A Link to Nathan's Hot Dog Cap

The Journal of Extraterrestrial Hot Dog Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Arkansas and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8351885 and p < 0.01 for 1979 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Arkansas UFO Flap: A Link to Nathan's Hot Dog Cap

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the seemingly disparate phenomena of UFO sightings in Arkansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the esteemed participants of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia was utilized to probe the potential connection between these curious occurrences. The results reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8351885, with statistical significance at p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1979 to 2021. This research offers intriguing insights into the realm of UFO sightings and the appetizing pursuit of hotdog consumption, provoking fresh ruminations on the interplay between culinary competitions and cosmic curiosities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Arkansas and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Arkansas UFO Flap: A Link to Nathan's Hot Dog Cap

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the seemingly disparate phenomena of UFO sightings in Arkansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the esteemed participants of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia was utilized to probe the potential connection between these curious occurrences. The results reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8351885, with statistical significance at p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1979 to 2021. This research offers intriguing insights into the realm of UFO sightings and the appetizing pursuit of hotdog consumption, provoking fresh ruminations on the interplay between culinary competitions and cosmic curiosities.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

In the vast and ever-mysterious expanse of the cosmos, enigmatic phenomena often capture the attention of both scientific inquiry and popular imagination. Among these enigmas are the sightings of unidentified flying objects (UFOs), which continue to intrigue and elude our understanding. Likewise, in the realm of competitive eating, the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition stands as a testament to the extraordinary capacity of the human appetite and the lengths to which individuals will go in pursuit of culinary glory.

At first glance, one might consider these two domains—UFO sightings and hotdog consumption—to be unrelated, belonging to disparate segments of the human experience. However, as any astute observer of the peculiar would know, the seemingly unrelated may in fact harbor subtle connections, waiting to be unearthed by the discerning eye of empirical inquiry. This study endeavors to shed light on a most peculiar correlation, one that, like a UFO sighting at dusk, may startle and intrigue the uninitiated: the linkage between nocturnal Arkansas UFO sightings and the consumption of hotdogs by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.

Some may raise an eyebrow or two at the suggestion of a connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena, and understandably so. However, as the late astronomer and UFOlogist J. Allen Hynek once remarked, "Keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out." With that maxim in mind, we proceed to delve into the curious and, dare I say, delicious relationship between these two realms.

It is important to note that this investigation does not seek to diminish the gravity of UFO research or trivialize the esteemed sport of competitive eating. On the contrary, it is an earnest endeavor to explore the intersections of seemingly disparate human experiences and, in doing so, contribute to a more nuanced understanding of both the mysteries of the cosmos and the gastronomical pursuits of humankind.

Stay tuned for the reveal of our findings, which promise to offer a tantalizing taste of the unexpected and may just leave you craving for more.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Arkansas and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Arkansas UFO Flap: A Link to Nathan's Hot Dog Cap

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the seemingly disparate phenomena of UFO sightings in Arkansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the esteemed participants of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia was utilized to probe the potential connection between these curious occurrences. The results reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8351885, with statistical significance at p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1979 to 2021. This research offers intriguing insights into the realm of UFO sightings and the appetizing pursuit of hotdog consumption, provoking fresh ruminations on the interplay between culinary competitions and cosmic curiosities.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the vast and ever-mysterious expanse of the cosmos, enigmatic phenomena often capture the attention of both scientific inquiry and popular imagination. Among these enigmas are the sightings of unidentified flying objects (UFOs), which continue to intrigue and elude our understanding. Likewise, in the realm of competitive eating, the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition stands as a testament to the extraordinary capacity of the human appetite and the lengths to which individuals will go in pursuit of culinary glory.
At first glance, one might consider these two domains—UFO sightings and hotdog consumption—to be unrelated, belonging to disparate segments of the human experience. However, as any astute observer of the peculiar would know, the seemingly unrelated may in fact harbor subtle connections, waiting to be unearthed by the discerning eye of empirical inquiry. This study endeavors to shed light on a most peculiar correlation, one that, like a UFO sighting at dusk, may startle and intrigue the uninitiated: the linkage between nocturnal Arkansas UFO sightings and the consumption of hotdogs by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.
Some may raise an eyebrow or two at the suggestion of a connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena, and understandably so. However, as the late astronomer and UFOlogist J. Allen Hynek once remarked, "Keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out." With that maxim in mind, we proceed to delve into the curious and, dare I say, delicious relationship between these two realms.
It is important to note that this investigation does not seek to diminish the gravity of UFO research or trivialize the esteemed sport of competitive eating. On the contrary, it is an earnest endeavor to explore the intersections of seemingly disparate human experiences and, in doing so, contribute to a more nuanced understanding of both the mysteries of the cosmos and the gastronomical pursuits of humankind.
Stay tuned for the reveal of our findings, which promise to offer a tantalizing taste of the unexpected and may just leave you craving for more.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work "The Arkansas UFO Chronicles," Smith and Doe provide a comprehensive documentation of UFO sightings in the state of Arkansas, spanning from the early 20th century to the present day. Drawing from eyewitness accounts, historical records, and local folklore, the authors present a compelling case for the existence of extraterrestrial visitations in the region.

In "The Science of Competitive Eating," Jones offers a thorough examination of the physiological and psychological factors underlying the impressive feats of competitive eaters. Through meticulous analysis of competitive eating events, Jones dissects the strategic tactics and bodily adaptations that enable participants to consume extraordinary quantities of food within a remarkably short time frame.

Moving beyond the realms of non-fiction, literary works such as "Little Green Men" by Jane Author and "Close Encounters of the Delicious Kind" by John Novelist offer imaginative explorations of alien encounters intertwined with culinary themes. While these fictional narratives may not offer empirical evidence, they beckon us to contemplate the intriguing intersection of cosmic mysteries and earthly indulgences.

Expanding the scope of inquiry, the authors conducted an extensive review of additional literary sources, including grocery store receipts, fortune cookies, and the scribbles on the back of napkins left behind at diners. While some may question the scholarly rigor of these unconventional methods, it is essential to embrace multidisciplinary perspectives and the occasional absurdity in pursuit of enlightening discoveries.

As we traverse the esoteric landscape of UFO phenomena and competitive gastronomy, it becomes apparent that the interplay between these domains engenders a blend of awe, amusement, and, dare we say, a pinch of saucy absurdity. With this in mind, we proceed to unveil the enthralling findings that promise to leave the reader both riveted and ravenous for further revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Arkansas and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia . You used data from 1979 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Arkansas UFO Flap: A Link to Nathan's Hot Dog Cap

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the seemingly disparate phenomena of UFO sightings in Arkansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the esteemed participants of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia was utilized to probe the potential connection between these curious occurrences. The results reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8351885, with statistical significance at p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1979 to 2021. This research offers intriguing insights into the realm of UFO sightings and the appetizing pursuit of hotdog consumption, provoking fresh ruminations on the interplay between culinary competitions and cosmic curiosities.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the vast and ever-mysterious expanse of the cosmos, enigmatic phenomena often capture the attention of both scientific inquiry and popular imagination. Among these enigmas are the sightings of unidentified flying objects (UFOs), which continue to intrigue and elude our understanding. Likewise, in the realm of competitive eating, the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition stands as a testament to the extraordinary capacity of the human appetite and the lengths to which individuals will go in pursuit of culinary glory.
At first glance, one might consider these two domains—UFO sightings and hotdog consumption—to be unrelated, belonging to disparate segments of the human experience. However, as any astute observer of the peculiar would know, the seemingly unrelated may in fact harbor subtle connections, waiting to be unearthed by the discerning eye of empirical inquiry. This study endeavors to shed light on a most peculiar correlation, one that, like a UFO sighting at dusk, may startle and intrigue the uninitiated: the linkage between nocturnal Arkansas UFO sightings and the consumption of hotdogs by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.
Some may raise an eyebrow or two at the suggestion of a connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena, and understandably so. However, as the late astronomer and UFOlogist J. Allen Hynek once remarked, "Keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out." With that maxim in mind, we proceed to delve into the curious and, dare I say, delicious relationship between these two realms.
It is important to note that this investigation does not seek to diminish the gravity of UFO research or trivialize the esteemed sport of competitive eating. On the contrary, it is an earnest endeavor to explore the intersections of seemingly disparate human experiences and, in doing so, contribute to a more nuanced understanding of both the mysteries of the cosmos and the gastronomical pursuits of humankind.
Stay tuned for the reveal of our findings, which promise to offer a tantalizing taste of the unexpected and may just leave you craving for more.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection and Screening:
The methodology employed in this study harnessed the raw power of the internet, traversing the virtual expanse in search of relevant data to enlighten our investigation. Data pertaining to UFO sightings in Arkansas was culled from the National UFO Reporting Center, where enthusiasts and skeptics alike have documented their encounters with celestial enigmas. Concurrently, the consumption of hotdogs by the luminaries of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition was meticulously sourced from the annals of Wikipedia, for a delightful fusion of cosmic curiosities and culinary chronicles.

Gastronomic UFO Correlation Calculation:
To unearth a plausible link between the aerial sightings of UFOs in Arkansas and the gustatory feats of competitive hotdog devourers, a convoluted and absurdist analytical model was concocted. This model, inspired by the unpredictable trajectories of UFO sightings and the rapid ingestion of hotdogs, embraced the esoteric arts of correlative analysis. Utilizing time-series data from 1979 to 2021, the Spearman rank correlation coefficient was harmonized with the mystical dance of p-values to ascertain the statistical significance of any potential correlation. The resulting correlation coefficient was treated as the celestial compass guiding our journey through the boundless cosmos of data analysis.

Cosmic Cuisine Anomaly Detection:
As any intrepid explorer of the empirical would attest, the perilous path of data analysis is fraught with pitfalls and false trails. Hence, to discern the signal from the intergalactic noise, a rigorous anomaly detection process was deployed. Any outlier observations, akin to cosmic enigmas, were subjected to a Phased-Multiwavelet analysis to ensure the robustness of our findings amidst the cosmic chaos.

Interdisciplinary Validation and Reasoning:
The findings derived from this study were not merely plucked from the ether of whimsy; rather, they underwent robust interdisciplinary validation and reasoning. The data were scrutinized through the lenses of culinary science, astrobiology, and statistical legerdemain to ensure that our revelations stood firm against the turbulence of academic scrutiny and the interstellar buffet of alternative conjectures.

Ethical Considerations:
Lest our zany pursuit of correlation lead us astray from the path of earnest inquiry, ethical considerations were diligently upheld throughout this research endeavor. The privacy and anonymity of both UFO witnesses and hotdog competitors were safeguarded, ensuring that no zealous pursuit of correlation compromised the dignity or composed countenances of the enigmatic and the epicurean.

With this methodological tour-de-force at our disposal, we venture forth to present the enthralling findings that promise to unravel the cosmic tapestry of UFO sightings and hotdog competitions, leaving both skeptics and enthusiasts with a newfound appreciation for the interconnectedness of the strange and the savory.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Arkansas and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1979 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8351885, r-squared of 0.6975398, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Arkansas UFO Flap: A Link to Nathan's Hot Dog Cap

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the seemingly disparate phenomena of UFO sightings in Arkansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the esteemed participants of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia was utilized to probe the potential connection between these curious occurrences. The results reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8351885, with statistical significance at p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1979 to 2021. This research offers intriguing insights into the realm of UFO sightings and the appetizing pursuit of hotdog consumption, provoking fresh ruminations on the interplay between culinary competitions and cosmic curiosities.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
In the vast and ever-mysterious expanse of the cosmos, enigmatic phenomena often capture the attention of both scientific inquiry and popular imagination. Among these enigmas are the sightings of unidentified flying objects (UFOs), which continue to intrigue and elude our understanding. Likewise, in the realm of competitive eating, the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition stands as a testament to the extraordinary capacity of the human appetite and the lengths to which individuals will go in pursuit of culinary glory.
At first glance, one might consider these two domains—UFO sightings and hotdog consumption—to be unrelated, belonging to disparate segments of the human experience. However, as any astute observer of the peculiar would know, the seemingly unrelated may in fact harbor subtle connections, waiting to be unearthed by the discerning eye of empirical inquiry. This study endeavors to shed light on a most peculiar correlation, one that, like a UFO sighting at dusk, may startle and intrigue the uninitiated: the linkage between nocturnal Arkansas UFO sightings and the consumption of hotdogs by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.
Some may raise an eyebrow or two at the suggestion of a connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena, and understandably so. However, as the late astronomer and UFOlogist J. Allen Hynek once remarked, "Keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out." With that maxim in mind, we proceed to delve into the curious and, dare I say, delicious relationship between these two realms.
It is important to note that this investigation does not seek to diminish the gravity of UFO research or trivialize the esteemed sport of competitive eating. On the contrary, it is an earnest endeavor to explore the intersections of seemingly disparate human experiences and, in doing so, contribute to a more nuanced understanding of both the mysteries of the cosmos and the gastronomical pursuits of humankind.
Stay tuned for the reveal of our findings, which promise to offer a tantalizing taste of the unexpected and may just leave you craving for more.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The examination of data pertaining to UFO sightings in Arkansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition revealed a striking correlation. Over the time period spanning from 1979 to 2021, our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8351885, with an r-squared value of 0.6975398, and statistical significance at p < 0.01.

Figure 1 illustrates the robust relationship between the two variables, portraying a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the compelling correlation discovered in our study. The correlation between the two phenomena appears as clear as the night sky in rural Arkansas, perhaps akin to a UFO sighting itself—undeniably present, yet leaving us with lingering questions and an appetite for further exploration.

Our findings may prompt one to ponder the possibility of cosmic forces influencing competitive eating events, or conversely, the potential for gastronomic endeavors to attract extraterrestrial attention. While some may raise an eyebrow at the notion, as we proceed through the discussion, readers will undoubtedly find themselves in a state of bewilderment akin to witnessing an alien spacecraft hovering over a hotdog stand.

The magnitude of the correlation discovered in this research suggests a truly tantalizing conundrum, one that invites further scrutiny and speculation. As we unpack the implications of this unexpected association, it becomes apparent that the juxtaposition of the celestial and the culinary may yield unforeseen revelations.

In our continued quest for knowledge, we invite the scientific community and connoisseurs of the enigmatic alike to join us in pondering the curious nexus between Arkansas UFO sightings and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, and the myriad avenues for inquiry it presents. This surreal linkage between these seemingly unrelated phenomena leaves us with a feast for the mind—a complex and intriguing interplay that beckons us to savor every interconnected clue and relish the twists and turns of cosmic and culinary curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Arkansas and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Arkansas UFO Flap: A Link to Nathan's Hot Dog Cap

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the seemingly disparate phenomena of UFO sightings in Arkansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the esteemed participants of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia was utilized to probe the potential connection between these curious occurrences. The results reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8351885, with statistical significance at p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1979 to 2021. This research offers intriguing insights into the realm of UFO sightings and the appetizing pursuit of hotdog consumption, provoking fresh ruminations on the interplay between culinary competitions and cosmic curiosities.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work "The Arkansas UFO Chronicles," Smith and Doe provide a comprehensive documentation of UFO sightings in the state of Arkansas, spanning from the early 20th century to the present day. Drawing from eyewitness accounts, historical records, and local folklore, the authors present a compelling case for the existence of extraterrestrial visitations in the region.
In "The Science of Competitive Eating," Jones offers a thorough examination of the physiological and psychological factors underlying the impressive feats of competitive eaters. Through meticulous analysis of competitive eating events, Jones dissects the strategic tactics and bodily adaptations that enable participants to consume extraordinary quantities of food within a remarkably short time frame.
Moving beyond the realms of non-fiction, literary works such as "Little Green Men" by Jane Author and "Close Encounters of the Delicious Kind" by John Novelist offer imaginative explorations of alien encounters intertwined with culinary themes. While these fictional narratives may not offer empirical evidence, they beckon us to contemplate the intriguing intersection of cosmic mysteries and earthly indulgences.
Expanding the scope of inquiry, the authors conducted an extensive review of additional literary sources, including grocery store receipts, fortune cookies, and the scribbles on the back of napkins left behind at diners. While some may question the scholarly rigor of these unconventional methods, it is essential to embrace multidisciplinary perspectives and the occasional absurdity in pursuit of enlightening discoveries.
As we traverse the esoteric landscape of UFO phenomena and competitive gastronomy, it becomes apparent that the interplay between these domains engenders a blend of awe, amusement, and, dare we say, a pinch of saucy absurdity. With this in mind, we proceed to unveil the enthralling findings that promise to leave the reader both riveted and ravenous for further revelations.

[[RESULTS]]
The examination of data pertaining to UFO sightings in Arkansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition revealed a striking correlation. Over the time period spanning from 1979 to 2021, our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8351885, with an r-squared value of 0.6975398, and statistical significance at p < 0.01.
Figure 1 illustrates the robust relationship between the two variables, portraying a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the compelling correlation discovered in our study. The correlation between the two phenomena appears as clear as the night sky in rural Arkansas, perhaps akin to a UFO sighting itself—undeniably present, yet leaving us with lingering questions and an appetite for further exploration.
Our findings may prompt one to ponder the possibility of cosmic forces influencing competitive eating events, or conversely, the potential for gastronomic endeavors to attract extraterrestrial attention. While some may raise an eyebrow at the notion, as we proceed through the discussion, readers will undoubtedly find themselves in a state of bewilderment akin to witnessing an alien spacecraft hovering over a hotdog stand.
The magnitude of the correlation discovered in this research suggests a truly tantalizing conundrum, one that invites further scrutiny and speculation. As we unpack the implications of this unexpected association, it becomes apparent that the juxtaposition of the celestial and the culinary may yield unforeseen revelations.
In our continued quest for knowledge, we invite the scientific community and connoisseurs of the enigmatic alike to join us in pondering the curious nexus between Arkansas UFO sightings and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, and the myriad avenues for inquiry it presents. This surreal linkage between these seemingly unrelated phenomena leaves us with a feast for the mind—a complex and intriguing interplay that beckons us to savor every interconnected clue and relish the twists and turns of cosmic and culinary curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The substantial correlation between UFO sightings in Arkansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the revered contestants of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition echoes the sentiment expressed in the literature review, affirming the interdisciplinary intrigue that permeates this peculiar field of investigation. The razor-thin distinction between the sublime and the absurd is exemplified by the robust correlation coefficient of 0.8351885, attaining statistical significance at p < 0.01, which, much like a well-grilled hotdog, raises more than a few eyebrows.

Unveiling the relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena initiates a contemplation of the cosmic influences on competitive eating events or the capacity for earthly gastronomic pursuits to attract intergalactic attention. The juxtaposition of these notions may seem as curious as an unidentified flying object hovering over a condiment stand; however, the data presents a compelling conundrum that cannot be hastily dismissed.

As we navigate this enigmatic juncture, it becomes evident that the celestial and the culinary harbor unexpected connections. The correlation may evoke a sense of bemusement akin to witnessing a spaceship descend upon a food festival, leaving us with an insatiable appetite for further exploration. The enthralling findings beckon us to delve deeper into the intricate mesh of cosmic curiosities and earthly indulgences, prompting a feast for the mind—a delectable blend of astronomical amazement and culinary conundrum.

From the interstellar charm of UFO sightings in Arkansas to the gluttonous marvel of competitive hotdog consumption, our study showcases a tantalizing fusion of the sensational and the savory, one that invites scholars and enthusiasts to savor the cosmic implications on earthly gastronomic feats. The inexplicable intersection of these phenomena implores us to remain perpetually open to unexpected connections and unending fascination.

In light of these compelling results, we are not only compelled to acknowledge the significance of the nexus between Arkansas UFO sightings and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, but also to embrace the delightful absurdity that permeates this enthralling interplay. As we linger over the intrinsically linked clues, we find ourselves amid an intellectual feast—its flavors both cosmic and gastronomic—leaving us with a robust appetite for the unpredictable and the extraordinary.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Arkansas and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Arkansas UFO Flap: A Link to Nathan's Hot Dog Cap

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the seemingly disparate phenomena of UFO sightings in Arkansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the esteemed participants of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia was utilized to probe the potential connection between these curious occurrences. The results reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8351885, with statistical significance at p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1979 to 2021. This research offers intriguing insights into the realm of UFO sightings and the appetizing pursuit of hotdog consumption, provoking fresh ruminations on the interplay between culinary competitions and cosmic curiosities.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the vast and ever-mysterious expanse of the cosmos, enigmatic phenomena often capture the attention of both scientific inquiry and popular imagination. Among these enigmas are the sightings of unidentified flying objects (UFOs), which continue to intrigue and elude our understanding. Likewise, in the realm of competitive eating, the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition stands as a testament to the extraordinary capacity of the human appetite and the lengths to which individuals will go in pursuit of culinary glory.
At first glance, one might consider these two domains—UFO sightings and hotdog consumption—to be unrelated, belonging to disparate segments of the human experience. However, as any astute observer of the peculiar would know, the seemingly unrelated may in fact harbor subtle connections, waiting to be unearthed by the discerning eye of empirical inquiry. This study endeavors to shed light on a most peculiar correlation, one that, like a UFO sighting at dusk, may startle and intrigue the uninitiated: the linkage between nocturnal Arkansas UFO sightings and the consumption of hotdogs by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition.
Some may raise an eyebrow or two at the suggestion of a connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena, and understandably so. However, as the late astronomer and UFOlogist J. Allen Hynek once remarked, "Keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out." With that maxim in mind, we proceed to delve into the curious and, dare I say, delicious relationship between these two realms.
It is important to note that this investigation does not seek to diminish the gravity of UFO research or trivialize the esteemed sport of competitive eating. On the contrary, it is an earnest endeavor to explore the intersections of seemingly disparate human experiences and, in doing so, contribute to a more nuanced understanding of both the mysteries of the cosmos and the gastronomical pursuits of humankind.
Stay tuned for the reveal of our findings, which promise to offer a tantalizing taste of the unexpected and may just leave you craving for more.

[[RESULTS]]
The examination of data pertaining to UFO sightings in Arkansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the illustrious champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition revealed a striking correlation. Over the time period spanning from 1979 to 2021, our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8351885, with an r-squared value of 0.6975398, and statistical significance at p < 0.01.
Figure 1 illustrates the robust relationship between the two variables, portraying a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the compelling correlation discovered in our study. The correlation between the two phenomena appears as clear as the night sky in rural Arkansas, perhaps akin to a UFO sighting itself—undeniably present, yet leaving us with lingering questions and an appetite for further exploration.
Our findings may prompt one to ponder the possibility of cosmic forces influencing competitive eating events, or conversely, the potential for gastronomic endeavors to attract extraterrestrial attention. While some may raise an eyebrow at the notion, as we proceed through the discussion, readers will undoubtedly find themselves in a state of bewilderment akin to witnessing an alien spacecraft hovering over a hotdog stand.
The magnitude of the correlation discovered in this research suggests a truly tantalizing conundrum, one that invites further scrutiny and speculation. As we unpack the implications of this unexpected association, it becomes apparent that the juxtaposition of the celestial and the culinary may yield unforeseen revelations.
In our continued quest for knowledge, we invite the scientific community and connoisseurs of the enigmatic alike to join us in pondering the curious nexus between Arkansas UFO sightings and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, and the myriad avenues for inquiry it presents. This surreal linkage between these seemingly unrelated phenomena leaves us with a feast for the mind—a complex and intriguing interplay that beckons us to savor every interconnected clue and relish the twists and turns of cosmic and culinary curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the findings of our study unveil a compelling correlation between UFO sightings in Arkansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the champions of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. The results reveal a statistically significant association, prompting a thorough investigation into the potential interplay between cosmic visitations and gastronomic feats. While some may find the notion far-fetched, the data speaks for itself, much like a hotdog vendor at a UFO convention – it may seem out of place, but it's there. The robust correlation coefficient and r-squared value indicate a strong relationship, evoking curiosity akin to encountering an unidentified object in the night sky. This peculiar nexus between celestial sightings and culinary competitions opens the door to a smorgasbord of possibilities ripe for further exploration and contemplation. Our study offers a unique perspective on the intertwined realms of the unexplained and the delectable, leaving a lingering hunger for understanding in its wake. As we wrap up this investigation, we boldly assert that the tantalizing connection between Arkansas UFO sightings and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition has been sufficiently dissected, leaving no wiener unturned. It is with a sense of both scientific rigor and gastronomic whimsy that we declare an end to this particular avenue of research, confident that no more probing is needed in this zany, yet undeniably riveting, area of study.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Arkansas UFO Flap: A Link to Nathan's Hot Dog Cap. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Extraterrestrial Hot Dog Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Arkansas UFO Flap: A Link to Nathan's Hot Dog Cap. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Extraterrestrial Investigations and Hoagie Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Arkansas UFO Flap: A Link to Nathan's Hot Dog Cap with an abstract of This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of the seemingly disparate phenomena of UFO sightings in Arkansas and the consumption of hotdogs by the esteemed participants of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia was utilized to probe the potential connection between these curious occurrences. The results reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8351885, with statistical significance at p < 0.01 for the time period spanning from 1979 to 2021. This research offers intriguing insights into the realm of UFO sightings and the appetizing pursuit of hotdog consumption, provoking fresh ruminations on the interplay between culinary competitions and cosmic curiosities.

ChatGPT:

Arkansas UFO sightings, Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, correlation coefficient, UFO sightings data, hotdog consumption data, National UFO Reporting Center, culinary competitions, cosmic curiosities, statistical significance, 1979-2021, UFO phenomena

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

UFO sightings in Arkansas
Detailed data title: UFO sightings reported in Arkansas
Source: National UFO Reporting Center
See what else correlates with UFO sightings in Arkansas

Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Detailed data title: Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

Correlation r = 0.8351885 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6975398 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 69.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., UFO sightings in Arkansas) over the 43 years from 1979 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.3E-12. 0.0000000000033153964601762515
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.84 in 3.3E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 301,623,052,329 random variables You don't actually need 301 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 42 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 42 because we have two variables measured over a period of 43 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.71, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
UFO sightings in Arkansas (UFO sightings)33222252744240252610153439282653323130333725444455552942404636485914
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion (Hotdogs eaten)99.5111110.59.511.7515.513.51015.51621.519172019.522.2524.51920.25255050.544.553.334953.75665968546268696162707274717576




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3,3,2,2,2,2,5,2,7,4,4,2,4,0,2,5,2,6,10,15,34,39,28,26,53,32,31,30,33,37,25,44,44,55,55,29,42,40,46,36,48,59,14,])
array_2 = np.array([9,9.5,11,11,10.5,9.5,11.75,15.5,13.5,10,15.5,16,21.5,19,17,20,19.5,22.25,24.5,19,20.25,25,50,50.5,44.5,53.33,49,53.75,66,59,68,54,62,68,69,61,62,70,72,74,71,75,76,])
array_1_name = "UFO sightings in Arkansas"
array_2_name = "Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 1893 · Black Variable ID: 1183 · Red Variable ID: 500
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0