about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,808 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of costume attendants in Minnesota and the second variable is Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of costume attendants in Minnesota increased, so did the use of wig adhesive. This extra-strong adhesive contains a top-secret ingredient that, when combined with the cold Minnesota air, had an unintended side effect - it leached into the atmosphere and somehow interacted with male hormones, leading to an uptick in male pattern baldness. It's a hairy situation for sure!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a cyber folk-inspired scene set in a vibrant hair salon in Minnesota. Within the salon, three eccentric costume attendants are meticulously styling wigs and applying theatrical makeup for a performance. Meanwhile, in the corner of the salon, a computer screen displays a search bar with "male pattern baldness" typed into Google, showing search results related to the query. The scene should exude a sense of creative energy and technological integration, blending the traditional art of hairstyling and makeup with modern digital elements. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A TIME magazine cover image Cyber folk Voxel art 3D Pixar Style Sci-fi fantacy
ChatGPT: Cyber folk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling hair salon in Minnesota, three costume attendants are busy styling wigs and applying makeup for a theatrical production. As they work, a computer in the corner shows a search bar with "male pattern baldness" typed into Google, with the search results displayed on the screen.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyber folk ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling hair salon in Minnesota, three costume attendants are busy styling wigs and applying makeup for a theatrical production. As they work, a computer in the corner shows a search bar with "male pattern baldness" typed into Google, with the search results displayed on the screen. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a cyber folk-inspired scene set in a vibrant hair salon in Minnesota. Within the salon, three eccentric costume attendants are meticulously styling wigs and applying theatrical makeup for a performance. Meanwhile, in the corner of the salon, a computer screen displays a search bar with "male pattern baldness" typed into Google, showing search results related to the query. The scene should exude a sense of creative energy and technological integration, blending the traditional art of hairstyling and makeup with modern digital elements.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of costume attendants in Minnesota caused male pattern baldness (Google searches for 'male pattern baldness') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Curious Correlation between Costume Crews and Cranial Concerns: A Comedic Case Study

The Journal of Hilarious Health Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8047352 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Curious Correlation between Costume Crews and Cranial Concerns: A Comedic Case Study

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the mysterious link between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team delved into this follicularly fascinating phenomenon. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8047352 (p < 0.01) from 2004 to 2020, indicating a compelling relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. The implications of these findings are, well, quite hair-raising! Our paper combines rigorous statistical analysis with a touch of whimsy, presenting an intriguing case that will surely leave readers both scratching their heads and chuckling.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Curious Correlation between Costume Crews and Cranial Concerns: A Comedic Case Study

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the mysterious link between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team delved into this follicularly fascinating phenomenon. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8047352 (p < 0.01) from 2004 to 2020, indicating a compelling relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. The implications of these findings are, well, quite hair-raising! Our paper combines rigorous statistical analysis with a touch of whimsy, presenting an intriguing case that will surely leave readers both scratching their heads and chuckling.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena have long bewildered scholars and practitioners alike. From the behavior of subatomic particles to the rise and fall of financial markets, the web of correlation has ensnared the curious and the scholarly in a tangled dance of investigation. However, one particularly bizarre and follicularly focused correlation has eluded examination until now: the relationship between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. While it may at first seem a bit fringe, this is no flyaway theory – the data beckons us to unravel its twisted tresses and peer into the untamed maze of interrelatedness.

We embarked on this follicular adventure armed with nothing but a sturdy statistical model and a healthy dose of skepticism. Yet, much to our surprise and delight, the data revealed a hair-raising secret: a robust correlation that leaves other statistically significant associations in the dust like so many unsightly clumps of shed hair. Our findings, with a correlation coefficient that could rival the strongest pomade, exhibited a compelling relationship that begged for further exploration.

This peculiar partnership between wardrobe wizards and cranial curiosity offers a glimpse into the enigmatic dance of cause and effect, or perhaps merely jests with our notions of statistical significance. From the hairspray-laden confines of costume departments to the hallowed halls of Google's search algorithms, this study aims to unravel the mysterious threads that bind together these seemingly disparate domains. So, don your thinking cap – or perhaps your favorite wig – and join us on this curious coif quest as we tease out the surprising secrets lurking within the data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Curious Correlation between Costume Crews and Cranial Concerns: A Comedic Case Study

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the mysterious link between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team delved into this follicularly fascinating phenomenon. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8047352 (p < 0.01) from 2004 to 2020, indicating a compelling relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. The implications of these findings are, well, quite hair-raising! Our paper combines rigorous statistical analysis with a touch of whimsy, presenting an intriguing case that will surely leave readers both scratching their heads and chuckling.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena have long bewildered scholars and practitioners alike. From the behavior of subatomic particles to the rise and fall of financial markets, the web of correlation has ensnared the curious and the scholarly in a tangled dance of investigation. However, one particularly bizarre and follicularly focused correlation has eluded examination until now: the relationship between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. While it may at first seem a bit fringe, this is no flyaway theory – the data beckons us to unravel its twisted tresses and peer into the untamed maze of interrelatedness.
We embarked on this follicular adventure armed with nothing but a sturdy statistical model and a healthy dose of skepticism. Yet, much to our surprise and delight, the data revealed a hair-raising secret: a robust correlation that leaves other statistically significant associations in the dust like so many unsightly clumps of shed hair. Our findings, with a correlation coefficient that could rival the strongest pomade, exhibited a compelling relationship that begged for further exploration.
This peculiar partnership between wardrobe wizards and cranial curiosity offers a glimpse into the enigmatic dance of cause and effect, or perhaps merely jests with our notions of statistical significance. From the hairspray-laden confines of costume departments to the hallowed halls of Google's search algorithms, this study aims to unravel the mysterious threads that bind together these seemingly disparate domains. So, don your thinking cap – or perhaps your favorite wig – and join us on this curious coif quest as we tease out the surprising secrets lurking within the data.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In Smith's comprehensive study, "The Influence of Labor Market Trends on Healthcare Consumer Behavior," the author explores the impact of employment patterns on individuals' health-related search queries. Similarly, Doe's research in "The Unlikely Connections: A Review of Peculiar Correlations" delves into unexpected relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, Jones examines the influence of regional demographics on online search behavior in "Demystifying Digital Queries: Probing Patterns in Cyberspace."

Transitioning to more specific literary sources, "The Economics of Costuming: A Comprehensive Analysis" by Thompson provides a detailed overview of the costume industry and its workforce. Moreover, "The Biology of Baldness: A Follicular Foible" by White offers a scientific perspective on the intricacies of male pattern baldness. As for fiction works, "The Misadventures of a Wig Salesman" by Green and "The Costume Crusader Chronicles" by Black provide a lighthearted take on the world of costume design and baldness.

Taking a more unconventional approach to literature review, the present study also drew insights from eclectic sources including tweeted haikus, fortune cookie messages, and the cryptic scribblings on the back of CVS receipts. While their scholarly value may be debatable, these unorthodox sources served to inject a touch of whimsy into the otherwise hairsplitting process of data analysis and literature review.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Curious Correlation between Costume Crews and Cranial Concerns: A Comedic Case Study

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the mysterious link between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team delved into this follicularly fascinating phenomenon. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8047352 (p < 0.01) from 2004 to 2020, indicating a compelling relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. The implications of these findings are, well, quite hair-raising! Our paper combines rigorous statistical analysis with a touch of whimsy, presenting an intriguing case that will surely leave readers both scratching their heads and chuckling.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena have long bewildered scholars and practitioners alike. From the behavior of subatomic particles to the rise and fall of financial markets, the web of correlation has ensnared the curious and the scholarly in a tangled dance of investigation. However, one particularly bizarre and follicularly focused correlation has eluded examination until now: the relationship between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. While it may at first seem a bit fringe, this is no flyaway theory – the data beckons us to unravel its twisted tresses and peer into the untamed maze of interrelatedness.
We embarked on this follicular adventure armed with nothing but a sturdy statistical model and a healthy dose of skepticism. Yet, much to our surprise and delight, the data revealed a hair-raising secret: a robust correlation that leaves other statistically significant associations in the dust like so many unsightly clumps of shed hair. Our findings, with a correlation coefficient that could rival the strongest pomade, exhibited a compelling relationship that begged for further exploration.
This peculiar partnership between wardrobe wizards and cranial curiosity offers a glimpse into the enigmatic dance of cause and effect, or perhaps merely jests with our notions of statistical significance. From the hairspray-laden confines of costume departments to the hallowed halls of Google's search algorithms, this study aims to unravel the mysterious threads that bind together these seemingly disparate domains. So, don your thinking cap – or perhaps your favorite wig – and join us on this curious coif quest as we tease out the surprising secrets lurking within the data.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to untangle the web of correlation between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness', a multi-faceted and follicularly focused approach was employed. The research team channelled their inner Sherlock Holmes, employing deductive reasoning and an extensive arsenal of statistical tools to conduct this investigation.

First and foremost, data pertaining to the number of costume attendants in Minnesota was sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This involved sifting through a veritable treasure trove of employment data, locating the specific information pertaining to costume attendants, and ensuring that any extraneous data was well and truly brushed aside.

Simultaneously, Google Trends was employed to harvest data on the frequency of searches for 'male pattern baldness' within the state of Minnesota. Utilizing the formidable power of Google's search algorithms, the research team plumbed the depths of cyberspace for this hirsute-focused information, hoping to uncover the scalp-seeking intentions of Minnesota residents.

The acquired data, spanning from 2004 to 2020, was then meticulously cleansed and coiffed to ensure that only the most relevant and lustrous strands of information remained. Outliers and confounding variables were rigorously pruned from the dataset in order to prevent any unruly frizz from obscuring the true follicular relationship at play.

Subsequently, a range of statistical analyses, including correlation coefficients and regression models, were employed to scrutinize the data and unearth the underlying connections between these seemingly disparate variables. These analyses were carried out with an unwavering commitment to statistical rigor, ensuring that the associations uncovered were not mere statistical coiffures, but rather, authentic and robust expressions of correlation.

Additionally, the research team engaged in extensive consultations with hairstylists and wig enthusiasts to gain insights into the potential cultural and sociological factors that may underpin the observed correlation. While this unconventional approach raised a few eyebrows, it provided valuable qualitative context to complement the quantitative analyses conducted.

In summary, this multi-pronged methodology fused rigorous statistical analyses, digital sleuthing, and improbable consultations, all in the pursuit of unraveling the follicularly fascinating relationship between costume attendants and cranial concerns. This approach was carefully designed to tease out the curious secrets nested within the data and offer insight into a correlation that, much like a carefully coiled perm, defies conventional explanation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8047352, r-squared of 0.6475988, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Curious Correlation between Costume Crews and Cranial Concerns: A Comedic Case Study

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the mysterious link between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team delved into this follicularly fascinating phenomenon. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8047352 (p < 0.01) from 2004 to 2020, indicating a compelling relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. The implications of these findings are, well, quite hair-raising! Our paper combines rigorous statistical analysis with a touch of whimsy, presenting an intriguing case that will surely leave readers both scratching their heads and chuckling.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena have long bewildered scholars and practitioners alike. From the behavior of subatomic particles to the rise and fall of financial markets, the web of correlation has ensnared the curious and the scholarly in a tangled dance of investigation. However, one particularly bizarre and follicularly focused correlation has eluded examination until now: the relationship between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. While it may at first seem a bit fringe, this is no flyaway theory – the data beckons us to unravel its twisted tresses and peer into the untamed maze of interrelatedness.
We embarked on this follicular adventure armed with nothing but a sturdy statistical model and a healthy dose of skepticism. Yet, much to our surprise and delight, the data revealed a hair-raising secret: a robust correlation that leaves other statistically significant associations in the dust like so many unsightly clumps of shed hair. Our findings, with a correlation coefficient that could rival the strongest pomade, exhibited a compelling relationship that begged for further exploration.
This peculiar partnership between wardrobe wizards and cranial curiosity offers a glimpse into the enigmatic dance of cause and effect, or perhaps merely jests with our notions of statistical significance. From the hairspray-laden confines of costume departments to the hallowed halls of Google's search algorithms, this study aims to unravel the mysterious threads that bind together these seemingly disparate domains. So, don your thinking cap – or perhaps your favorite wig – and join us on this curious coif quest as we tease out the surprising secrets lurking within the data.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis revealed a striking correlation between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. The correlation coefficient of 0.8047352 was indicative of a strong and positive relationship between these two variables. This finding was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.6475988, suggesting that approximately 64.76% of the variation in Google searches for 'male pattern baldness' could be explained by the number of costume attendants in Minnesota.

The p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between these variables, indicating that this observed correlation is unlikely to be a result of random chance. In other words, there is less than a 1% probability that the observed correlation occurred due to sampling variability.

Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. The plot showcases a clear, linear relationship, with the number of costume attendants increasing as the volume of Google searches for 'male pattern baldness' rises, and vice versa.

Overall, the findings of this study not only raise eyebrows but also call for further investigation into the unexpected alliance between the world of wardrobe and the mysteries of male pattern baldness. This tantalizing correlation invites contemplation on the curious ways in which seemingly unrelated phenomena may converge in the tangled depths of statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Curious Correlation between Costume Crews and Cranial Concerns: A Comedic Case Study

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the mysterious link between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team delved into this follicularly fascinating phenomenon. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8047352 (p < 0.01) from 2004 to 2020, indicating a compelling relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. The implications of these findings are, well, quite hair-raising! Our paper combines rigorous statistical analysis with a touch of whimsy, presenting an intriguing case that will surely leave readers both scratching their heads and chuckling.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In Smith's comprehensive study, "The Influence of Labor Market Trends on Healthcare Consumer Behavior," the author explores the impact of employment patterns on individuals' health-related search queries. Similarly, Doe's research in "The Unlikely Connections: A Review of Peculiar Correlations" delves into unexpected relationships between seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, Jones examines the influence of regional demographics on online search behavior in "Demystifying Digital Queries: Probing Patterns in Cyberspace."
Transitioning to more specific literary sources, "The Economics of Costuming: A Comprehensive Analysis" by Thompson provides a detailed overview of the costume industry and its workforce. Moreover, "The Biology of Baldness: A Follicular Foible" by White offers a scientific perspective on the intricacies of male pattern baldness. As for fiction works, "The Misadventures of a Wig Salesman" by Green and "The Costume Crusader Chronicles" by Black provide a lighthearted take on the world of costume design and baldness.
Taking a more unconventional approach to literature review, the present study also drew insights from eclectic sources including tweeted haikus, fortune cookie messages, and the cryptic scribblings on the back of CVS receipts. While their scholarly value may be debatable, these unorthodox sources served to inject a touch of whimsy into the otherwise hairsplitting process of data analysis and literature review.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a striking correlation between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. The correlation coefficient of 0.8047352 was indicative of a strong and positive relationship between these two variables. This finding was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.6475988, suggesting that approximately 64.76% of the variation in Google searches for 'male pattern baldness' could be explained by the number of costume attendants in Minnesota.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between these variables, indicating that this observed correlation is unlikely to be a result of random chance. In other words, there is less than a 1% probability that the observed correlation occurred due to sampling variability.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. The plot showcases a clear, linear relationship, with the number of costume attendants increasing as the volume of Google searches for 'male pattern baldness' rises, and vice versa.
Overall, the findings of this study not only raise eyebrows but also call for further investigation into the unexpected alliance between the world of wardrobe and the mysteries of male pattern baldness. This tantalizing correlation invites contemplation on the curious ways in which seemingly unrelated phenomena may converge in the tangled depths of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has uncovered a compelling correlation between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness', shedding light on the quirky interplay between these ostensibly unrelated phenomena. Our findings are in line with prior research by Smith, Doe, and Jones, who have all delved into the odd, unexpected associations between various variables. It appears that our hair-raising results not only confirm but also build upon the peculiar correlations documented in the literature.

Indeed, the eyebrow-raising revelation that labor market trends may influence health-related search queries, as posited by Smith, is echoed in our discovery of a significant relationship between costume attendants and baldness-related searches. Meanwhile, Doe's exploration of unusual correlations has prepared us to embrace with open arms the unlikely alliance between the costume industry and cranial concerns. Furthermore, the regional demographic influence on online search behavior, as examined by Jones, finds a curious parallel in our identification of a striking connection specific to the Minnesota labor market.

Drawing from the economics of costuming, as elucidated by Thompson, we can appreciate the tangible impact of employment patterns on individuals' health-related search behavior, including inquiries into male pattern baldness. Additionally, the biological insights into baldness presented by White offer a scientific underpinning for our observation of an intriguing link between the presence of costume attendants and the public's interest in male pattern baldness.

Our foray into unconventional literature sources, while imbued with a touch of whimsy, has unexpectedly unearthed insights that complement our empirical findings. The tweeted haikus, fortune cookie messages, and cryptic scribblings on CVS receipts have, in their own idiosyncratic way, offered a fresh perspective on the intersection of labor dynamics and follicular preoccupations.

In sum, our study not only corroborates previous scholarly inquiries into perplexing correlations but also brings to the fore a particularly curious connection between the bustling world of costume design and the perennial preoccupation with male pattern baldness. This revelatory correlation invites further exploration and contemplation, promising to untangle the web of incongruent yet oddly intertwined variables.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Curious Correlation between Costume Crews and Cranial Concerns: A Comedic Case Study

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the mysterious link between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team delved into this follicularly fascinating phenomenon. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8047352 (p < 0.01) from 2004 to 2020, indicating a compelling relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. The implications of these findings are, well, quite hair-raising! Our paper combines rigorous statistical analysis with a touch of whimsy, presenting an intriguing case that will surely leave readers both scratching their heads and chuckling.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena have long bewildered scholars and practitioners alike. From the behavior of subatomic particles to the rise and fall of financial markets, the web of correlation has ensnared the curious and the scholarly in a tangled dance of investigation. However, one particularly bizarre and follicularly focused correlation has eluded examination until now: the relationship between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. While it may at first seem a bit fringe, this is no flyaway theory – the data beckons us to unravel its twisted tresses and peer into the untamed maze of interrelatedness.
We embarked on this follicular adventure armed with nothing but a sturdy statistical model and a healthy dose of skepticism. Yet, much to our surprise and delight, the data revealed a hair-raising secret: a robust correlation that leaves other statistically significant associations in the dust like so many unsightly clumps of shed hair. Our findings, with a correlation coefficient that could rival the strongest pomade, exhibited a compelling relationship that begged for further exploration.
This peculiar partnership between wardrobe wizards and cranial curiosity offers a glimpse into the enigmatic dance of cause and effect, or perhaps merely jests with our notions of statistical significance. From the hairspray-laden confines of costume departments to the hallowed halls of Google's search algorithms, this study aims to unravel the mysterious threads that bind together these seemingly disparate domains. So, don your thinking cap – or perhaps your favorite wig – and join us on this curious coif quest as we tease out the surprising secrets lurking within the data.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a striking correlation between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. The correlation coefficient of 0.8047352 was indicative of a strong and positive relationship between these two variables. This finding was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.6475988, suggesting that approximately 64.76% of the variation in Google searches for 'male pattern baldness' could be explained by the number of costume attendants in Minnesota.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provided strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between these variables, indicating that this observed correlation is unlikely to be a result of random chance. In other words, there is less than a 1% probability that the observed correlation occurred due to sampling variability.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. The plot showcases a clear, linear relationship, with the number of costume attendants increasing as the volume of Google searches for 'male pattern baldness' rises, and vice versa.
Overall, the findings of this study not only raise eyebrows but also call for further investigation into the unexpected alliance between the world of wardrobe and the mysteries of male pattern baldness. This tantalizing correlation invites contemplation on the curious ways in which seemingly unrelated phenomena may converge in the tangled depths of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the curious correlation between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness' has left our researchers both bemused and bewigged. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8047352 (p < 0.01) has unquestionably highlighted the unexpected entanglement of these seemingly unrelated variables. This hair-raising revelation has certainly provided us with a new perspective on the interconnectedness of the world around us, not to mention a few chuckles along the way.

The implications of these findings are, well, quite hair-larious! It appears that the intricacies of male pattern baldness extend further than we ever thought possible, reaching into the whimsical world of costume departments. Whether it's the stress of sewing sequins or the fateful allure of follicular fate, this connection continues to elude simple explanation, much like a stubborn cowlick.

Thus, we find ourselves at a crossroads, faced with the choice of delving deeper into the depths of this follicularly fascinating phenomenon or letting this enigmatic coif convolute languish in the annals of statistical oddities. However, considering the pressing issues facing the world today, such as climate change, global health, and economic stability, perhaps it's time to part ways with this curious coiffure and allow it to retire gracefully – much like a well-worn toupee.

Therefore, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. It's time to bid adieu to this hairy endeavor, lest we become entangled in a web of statistical strands that lead nowhere particularly meaningful. There are simply too many pressing hair-emergencies in the world to be preoccupied with this whimsical wig-wearing wizardry.

In the immortal words of William Shakespeare (if he had been a balding bard), "To research, or not to research – that is the hair-raising question." And in the case of this peculiar correlation, our answer is clear: it's time to comb through more pressing matters.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Curious Correlation between Costume Crews and Cranial Concerns: A Comedic Case Study. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Hilarious Health Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Curious Correlation between Costume Crews and Cranial Concerns: A Comedic Case Study. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Theatrical Analysis and Neurological Integration


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Curious Correlation between Costume Crews and Cranial Concerns: A Comedic Case Study with an abstract of This study explores the mysterious link between the number of costume attendants in Minnesota and Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team delved into this follicularly fascinating phenomenon. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8047352 (p < 0.01) from 2004 to 2020, indicating a compelling relationship between the two seemingly unrelated variables. The implications of these findings are, well, quite hair-raising! Our paper combines rigorous statistical analysis with a touch of whimsy, presenting an intriguing case that will surely leave readers both scratching their heads and chuckling.

ChatGPT:

costume crew, cranial concerns, male pattern baldness, Minnesota, costume attendants, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, whimsy, comedic case study

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of costume attendants in Minnesota
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of costume attendants in Minnesota
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of costume attendants in Minnesota

Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'male pattern baldness' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'

Correlation r = 0.8047352 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6475988 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 64.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'male pattern baldness') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of costume attendants in Minnesota) over the 17 years from 2004 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.8E-5. 0.0000978936769813689600000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 0.0098% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 10,215 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.53, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
The number of costume attendants in Minnesota (Costume Attendants)120130806050403050405012014014021014070170
Google searches for 'male pattern baldness' (Rel. search volume)63.666757.552.916741.916745.416744.333343.58334347.666748.16675456.7554.416757.41675755.583359.3333




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([120,130,80,60,50,40,30,50,40,50,120,140,140,210,140,70,170,])
array_2 = np.array([63.6667,57.5,52.9167,41.9167,45.4167,44.3333,43.5833,43,47.6667,48.1667,54,56.75,54.4167,57.4167,57,55.5833,59.3333,])
array_1_name = "The number of costume attendants in Minnesota"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'male pattern baldness'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 1808 · Black Variable ID: 10007 · Red Variable ID: 1390
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0