about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,791 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Number of public school students in 4th grade and the second variable is Electricity generation in Paraguay.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of 4th graders rose, so did the collective brainpower dedicated to understanding energy, leading to an influx of innovative ideas for electricity generation in Paraguay. It turns out, these kids were sparking more than just an interest in learning!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Realistic ] In a classroom in Paraguay, a group of 4th grade students is enthusiastically engaged in a science experiment about electricity generation. The children are gathered around a table, wiring batteries and bulbs to create their own simple circuits. Their bright eyes and smiles convey their excitement and focus. At the center of the scene is their teacher, watching with pride as the students explore the wonders of electricity. Through the classroom window, a hydroelectric dam stands tall in the distance, providing sustainable energy for the entire region, including the students' school. The juxtaposition of the young learners and the hydroelectric dam illustrates the journey from curiosity to real-world applications of electricity. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Number of public school students in 4th grade and Electricity generation in Paraguay. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Celtic art Cutsy art illustration Realistic a Polaroid photo Pop art
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Number of public school students in 4th grade and Electricity generation in Paraguay together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a classroom in Paraguay, a group of 4th grade students is excitedly participating in a science experiment about electricity generation. The young students are eagerly working with wires, batteries, and bulbs to create their own simple circuits, while their teacher looks on proudly. Outside the classroom, a nearby hydroelectric dam can be seen, providing clean and sustainable electricity to power the entire region, including the students' school.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In a classroom in Paraguay, a group of 4th grade students is excitedly participating in a science experiment about electricity generation. The young students are eagerly working with wires, batteries, and bulbs to create their own simple circuits, while their teacher looks on proudly. Outside the classroom, a nearby hydroelectric dam can be seen, providing clean and sustainable electricity to power the entire region, including the students' school. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Realistic ] In a classroom in Paraguay, a group of 4th grade students is enthusiastically engaged in a science experiment about electricity generation. The children are gathered around a table, wiring batteries and bulbs to create their own simple circuits. Their bright eyes and smiles convey their excitement and focus. At the center of the scene is their teacher, watching with pride as the students explore the wonders of electricity. Through the classroom window, a hydroelectric dam stands tall in the distance, providing sustainable energy for the entire region, including the students' school. The juxtaposition of the young learners and the hydroelectric dam illustrates the journey from curiosity to real-world applications of electricity.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Number of public school students in 4th grade caused Electricity generation in Paraguay to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Link Between Public School Students and Electricity Generation in Paraguay

The Journal of Eclectic Energies and Educational Electricity

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 4th grade and Electricity generation in Paraguay. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9043858 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Link Between Public School Students and Electricity Generation in Paraguay"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this electrifying study, we investigate the captivating relationship between the number of public school students in 4th grade and electricity generation in Paraguay. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we unveiled a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9043858 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may be a spark of connection between the educational landscape and the electricity sector in Paraguay. This research sheds light on the unexplored relationship between academic pursuits and electrical power, illuminating the potential for future studies to delve into the high-voltage world of education and energy generation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 4th grade and Electricity generation in Paraguay. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Link Between Public School Students and Electricity Generation in Paraguay"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this electrifying study, we investigate the captivating relationship between the number of public school students in 4th grade and electricity generation in Paraguay. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we unveiled a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9043858 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may be a spark of connection between the educational landscape and the electricity sector in Paraguay. This research sheds light on the unexplored relationship between academic pursuits and electrical power, illuminating the potential for future studies to delve into the high-voltage world of education and energy generation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the realm of academic inquiry, some connections may seem more far-fetched than others. It’s not every day that one stumbles upon a correlation as unexpected as the one we present in this paper. As researchers, we are accustomed to exploring relationships between variables that, at first glance, may appear unrelated. However, our latest venture into the world of statistical analysis has left us both electrified and amused by the surprising link we have unearthed – the connection between the number of 4th-grade public school students and electricity generation in Paraguay.

On the surface, one might be inclined to believe that these two phenomena reside in separate realms, never to intersect. However, as the saying goes, "Ohm is where the heart is," and we were determined to ohm in on any potential relationship, no matter how shocking it may seem.

Paraguay, a landlocked country in South America known for its rich cultural heritage and stunning landscapes, also boasts a unique energy profile, mainly due to its extensive hydroelectric power generation capacity. Meanwhile, its education system, like that of many other nations, is tasked with nurturing the minds of its young students. But could there be more to these seemingly distinct features of Paraguay’s societal landscape than meets the eye?

Before delving into our findings, it is imperative to acknowledge the inherent skepticism that one might hold regarding the plausibility of such a connection. After all, the thought of a 4th-grade classroom directly influencing the generation of electricity may sound preposterous to the uninitiated. However, as researchers, we are no strangers to challenging conventional wisdom and unearthing unexpected relationships – after all, research is all about making those "ohm-grown" discoveries!

In the coming sections, we will elucidate the methodology employed, present our discerning findings, and delve into the implications of this striking correlation. So, buckle up and prepare to be illuminated by the gleaming insights that this research has to offer! After all, it’s not every day that a study leaves you feeling amped up about the world of statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 4th grade and Electricity generation in Paraguay. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Link Between Public School Students and Electricity Generation in Paraguay"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this electrifying study, we investigate the captivating relationship between the number of public school students in 4th grade and electricity generation in Paraguay. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we unveiled a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9043858 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may be a spark of connection between the educational landscape and the electricity sector in Paraguay. This research sheds light on the unexplored relationship between academic pursuits and electrical power, illuminating the potential for future studies to delve into the high-voltage world of education and energy generation.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, some connections may seem more far-fetched than others. It’s not every day that one stumbles upon a correlation as unexpected as the one we present in this paper. As researchers, we are accustomed to exploring relationships between variables that, at first glance, may appear unrelated. However, our latest venture into the world of statistical analysis has left us both electrified and amused by the surprising link we have unearthed – the connection between the number of 4th-grade public school students and electricity generation in Paraguay.
On the surface, one might be inclined to believe that these two phenomena reside in separate realms, never to intersect. However, as the saying goes, "Ohm is where the heart is," and we were determined to ohm in on any potential relationship, no matter how shocking it may seem.
Paraguay, a landlocked country in South America known for its rich cultural heritage and stunning landscapes, also boasts a unique energy profile, mainly due to its extensive hydroelectric power generation capacity. Meanwhile, its education system, like that of many other nations, is tasked with nurturing the minds of its young students. But could there be more to these seemingly distinct features of Paraguay’s societal landscape than meets the eye?
Before delving into our findings, it is imperative to acknowledge the inherent skepticism that one might hold regarding the plausibility of such a connection. After all, the thought of a 4th-grade classroom directly influencing the generation of electricity may sound preposterous to the uninitiated. However, as researchers, we are no strangers to challenging conventional wisdom and unearthing unexpected relationships – after all, research is all about making those "ohm-grown" discoveries!
In the coming sections, we will elucidate the methodology employed, present our discerning findings, and delve into the implications of this striking correlation. So, buckle up and prepare to be illuminated by the gleaming insights that this research has to offer! After all, it’s not every day that a study leaves you feeling amped up about the world of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The connection between the number of public school students in 4th grade and electricity generation in Paraguay may seem like a truly shocking revelation, but as we dive into the existing literature, it becomes evident that there are some underlying currents (and bad puns) at play here.

In "The Electrifying World of Paraguay: A Comprehensive Analysis" by Smith et al., the authors delve into the intricate web of Paraguay's energy landscape, highlighting the nation's heavy reliance on hydroelectric power generation. While this study primarily focuses on the technical and economic aspects of Paraguay's electricity generation, it also sparked our interest in the broader societal factors that might influence this vital industry. Little did we know that our journey would lead us to the heart of the elementary school classroom.

Doe and Jones, in their seminal work "Empowering Minds: The Intersection of Education and Energy," discuss the social and cultural determinants of electricity consumption and generation. While their work does not specifically address the relationship between primary education and energy production in Paraguay, it encourages readers to consider the various ways in which education and energy intertwine. We took this as a cue to venture into uncharted territory and explore the potential impact of young minds on the nation's power grid.

As we ventured further into the realm of literature, we couldn't help but recognize the relevance of non-fiction works such as "The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism" by Naomi Klein and "Power, Sex, Suicide: Mitochondria and the Meaning of Life" by Nick Lane, which, although not directly related to our subject matter, offered some electrifying inspiration for our research.

Moving into the realm of fiction, the works of Jules Verne, particularly "The Mysterious Island," and Michael Crichton's "Jurassic Park" provided some thought-provoking insights into the potential unintended consequences of manipulating natural forces, albeit in a more dramatic and fictional context. We couldn't help but draw parallels between these tales and the potential repercussions of underestimating the influence of 4th-grade students on the delicate balance of power generation in Paraguay.

In the spirit of thorough research, we also sought inspiration from unexpected sources. After binge-watching "The Magic School Bus" and "Captain Planet and the Planeteers," we couldn't help but wonder if Ms. Frizzle and Captain Planet might have some wisdom to impart on the intersection of education and energy. While our inquiry may have veered into the realm of whimsy, we firmly believe that a sprinkle of childhood nostalgia can infuse any study with a jolt of creativity.

Armed with an eclectic mix of scholarly works, literary parallels, and nostalgic musings, we set out to untangle the electrifying link between the number of 4th-grade public school students and electricity generation in Paraguay. It's safe to say we've been positively charged about this investigation, and we're voltage ourselves in the findings we are about to present.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 4th grade and Electricity generation in Paraguay. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1990 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Link Between Public School Students and Electricity Generation in Paraguay"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this electrifying study, we investigate the captivating relationship between the number of public school students in 4th grade and electricity generation in Paraguay. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we unveiled a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9043858 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may be a spark of connection between the educational landscape and the electricity sector in Paraguay. This research sheds light on the unexplored relationship between academic pursuits and electrical power, illuminating the potential for future studies to delve into the high-voltage world of education and energy generation.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, some connections may seem more far-fetched than others. It’s not every day that one stumbles upon a correlation as unexpected as the one we present in this paper. As researchers, we are accustomed to exploring relationships between variables that, at first glance, may appear unrelated. However, our latest venture into the world of statistical analysis has left us both electrified and amused by the surprising link we have unearthed – the connection between the number of 4th-grade public school students and electricity generation in Paraguay.
On the surface, one might be inclined to believe that these two phenomena reside in separate realms, never to intersect. However, as the saying goes, "Ohm is where the heart is," and we were determined to ohm in on any potential relationship, no matter how shocking it may seem.
Paraguay, a landlocked country in South America known for its rich cultural heritage and stunning landscapes, also boasts a unique energy profile, mainly due to its extensive hydroelectric power generation capacity. Meanwhile, its education system, like that of many other nations, is tasked with nurturing the minds of its young students. But could there be more to these seemingly distinct features of Paraguay’s societal landscape than meets the eye?
Before delving into our findings, it is imperative to acknowledge the inherent skepticism that one might hold regarding the plausibility of such a connection. After all, the thought of a 4th-grade classroom directly influencing the generation of electricity may sound preposterous to the uninitiated. However, as researchers, we are no strangers to challenging conventional wisdom and unearthing unexpected relationships – after all, research is all about making those "ohm-grown" discoveries!
In the coming sections, we will elucidate the methodology employed, present our discerning findings, and delve into the implications of this striking correlation. So, buckle up and prepare to be illuminated by the gleaming insights that this research has to offer! After all, it’s not every day that a study leaves you feeling amped up about the world of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mysterious connection between the number of 4th-grade public school students and electricity generation in Paraguay, our research team embarked on a data-driven odyssey that would make even Odysseus envious. We harnessed the power of information from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, which served as our trusty guides through the labyrinth of statistical analysis.

Our first step in this electrifying journey was to amass data on the number of public school students in 4th grade across Paraguay. Using a combination of web scraping, rigorous database searches, and a few fervent prayers to the data gods, we compiled a comprehensive dataset spanning the years 1990 to 2021. We left no Excel spreadsheet unturned and no pivot table un-pivoted in our quest for educational enlightenment.

Simultaneously, we ventured into the electrifying realm of electricity generation in Paraguay, immersing ourselves in the intricate web of kilowatt-hours, power plants, and energy consumption. The Energy Information Administration became our compass, guiding us through the labyrinth of electrical data while we navigated the currents of power production with the precision of a seasoned navigator.

Having amassed these datasets, we employed a robust mix of statistical methods to explore the potential relationship between 4th-grade students and electricity generation. Our fingers danced across the keyboard to conduct correlation analyses, regression models, and time series analyses, wielding the formidable power of SPSS and R with the finesse of a maestro conducting a symphony.

The resulting statistical output provided the voltage necessary to illuminate the relationship, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9043858 and a p-value less shocking than a mild electric jolt, p < 0.01. These findings sparked our excitement and left us buzzing with anticipation to share the shockingly enlightening results with the academic community.

In keeping with the scientific ethos of reproducibility, all data sources, cleaning procedures, and analytical methods have been documented with the thoroughness of a librarian cataloging ancient tomes. We stand by our commitment to transparency and accuracy, ensuring that future researchers can follow in our footsteps, albeit with slightly less dramatic flair.

Much like Paraguay's mighty hydroelectric dams, our methodology stands as a testament to the power of diligent research, electrifying discoveries, and an occasional pun or two. In the following sections, we will unveil the scintillating findings of this investigation, shedding light on the captivating relationship between education and electricity generation in Paraguay. So, without further ado, let us journey into the heart of this illuminating exploration!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 4th grade and Electricity generation in Paraguay. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1990 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9043858, r-squared of 0.8179138, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Link Between Public School Students and Electricity Generation in Paraguay"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this electrifying study, we investigate the captivating relationship between the number of public school students in 4th grade and electricity generation in Paraguay. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we unveiled a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9043858 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may be a spark of connection between the educational landscape and the electricity sector in Paraguay. This research sheds light on the unexplored relationship between academic pursuits and electrical power, illuminating the potential for future studies to delve into the high-voltage world of education and energy generation.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, some connections may seem more far-fetched than others. It’s not every day that one stumbles upon a correlation as unexpected as the one we present in this paper. As researchers, we are accustomed to exploring relationships between variables that, at first glance, may appear unrelated. However, our latest venture into the world of statistical analysis has left us both electrified and amused by the surprising link we have unearthed – the connection between the number of 4th-grade public school students and electricity generation in Paraguay.
On the surface, one might be inclined to believe that these two phenomena reside in separate realms, never to intersect. However, as the saying goes, "Ohm is where the heart is," and we were determined to ohm in on any potential relationship, no matter how shocking it may seem.
Paraguay, a landlocked country in South America known for its rich cultural heritage and stunning landscapes, also boasts a unique energy profile, mainly due to its extensive hydroelectric power generation capacity. Meanwhile, its education system, like that of many other nations, is tasked with nurturing the minds of its young students. But could there be more to these seemingly distinct features of Paraguay’s societal landscape than meets the eye?
Before delving into our findings, it is imperative to acknowledge the inherent skepticism that one might hold regarding the plausibility of such a connection. After all, the thought of a 4th-grade classroom directly influencing the generation of electricity may sound preposterous to the uninitiated. However, as researchers, we are no strangers to challenging conventional wisdom and unearthing unexpected relationships – after all, research is all about making those "ohm-grown" discoveries!
In the coming sections, we will elucidate the methodology employed, present our discerning findings, and delve into the implications of this striking correlation. So, buckle up and prepare to be illuminated by the gleaming insights that this research has to offer! After all, it’s not every day that a study leaves you feeling amped up about the world of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected revealed a striking correlation between the number of public school students in 4th grade and electricity generation in Paraguay. The correlation coefficient of 0.9043858 indicated a remarkably strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8179138, denoting that approximately 81.79% of the variability in electricity generation in Paraguay could be explained by the number of 4th-grade public school students. The p-value of less than 0.01 reinforced the statistical significance of this correlation, suggesting that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship by chance was exceedingly low.

As seen in Fig. 1, the scatterplot graphically depicts the robust correlation between the number of 4th-grade public school students and electricity generation in Paraguay. Each data point on the plot serves as a testament to the compelling interconnection between these variables, defying conventional expectations and leaving us rather energized by the revelation.

The observed correlation prompts an exploration into the underlying mechanisms that may give rise to this unexpected relationship. While it may seem shocking at first, it is essential to consider the potential factors contributing to this connection. Could it be the collective brainpower of 4th graders stimulating the creative energy behind electricity generation? Or perhaps the educational infrastructure plays a direct role in shaping the country's approach to energy production? These intriguing questions merit further investigation and may provide enlightening insights into the intricate nexus between education and electricity generation.

Our findings challenge the traditional boundaries of understanding and emphasize the need for interdisciplinary exploration. The integration of educational and energy policies may hold untapped potential for enhancing both academic outcomes and sustainable energy practices. This study serves as a catalyst for sparking dialogue and igniting curiosity about the unexpected intersections in our world. After all, who would have thought that the bright minds of 4th-grade students could be so powerfully linked to the generation of electricity in Paraguay? It’s a shocking discovery that leaves us both electrified and eager to delve further into the captivating realm of cross-disciplinary research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 4th grade and Electricity generation in Paraguay. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Link Between Public School Students and Electricity Generation in Paraguay"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this electrifying study, we investigate the captivating relationship between the number of public school students in 4th grade and electricity generation in Paraguay. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we unveiled a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9043858 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may be a spark of connection between the educational landscape and the electricity sector in Paraguay. This research sheds light on the unexplored relationship between academic pursuits and electrical power, illuminating the potential for future studies to delve into the high-voltage world of education and energy generation.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between the number of public school students in 4th grade and electricity generation in Paraguay may seem like a truly shocking revelation, but as we dive into the existing literature, it becomes evident that there are some underlying currents (and bad puns) at play here.
In "The Electrifying World of Paraguay: A Comprehensive Analysis" by Smith et al., the authors delve into the intricate web of Paraguay's energy landscape, highlighting the nation's heavy reliance on hydroelectric power generation. While this study primarily focuses on the technical and economic aspects of Paraguay's electricity generation, it also sparked our interest in the broader societal factors that might influence this vital industry. Little did we know that our journey would lead us to the heart of the elementary school classroom.
Doe and Jones, in their seminal work "Empowering Minds: The Intersection of Education and Energy," discuss the social and cultural determinants of electricity consumption and generation. While their work does not specifically address the relationship between primary education and energy production in Paraguay, it encourages readers to consider the various ways in which education and energy intertwine. We took this as a cue to venture into uncharted territory and explore the potential impact of young minds on the nation's power grid.
As we ventured further into the realm of literature, we couldn't help but recognize the relevance of non-fiction works such as "The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism" by Naomi Klein and "Power, Sex, Suicide: Mitochondria and the Meaning of Life" by Nick Lane, which, although not directly related to our subject matter, offered some electrifying inspiration for our research.
Moving into the realm of fiction, the works of Jules Verne, particularly "The Mysterious Island," and Michael Crichton's "Jurassic Park" provided some thought-provoking insights into the potential unintended consequences of manipulating natural forces, albeit in a more dramatic and fictional context. We couldn't help but draw parallels between these tales and the potential repercussions of underestimating the influence of 4th-grade students on the delicate balance of power generation in Paraguay.
In the spirit of thorough research, we also sought inspiration from unexpected sources. After binge-watching "The Magic School Bus" and "Captain Planet and the Planeteers," we couldn't help but wonder if Ms. Frizzle and Captain Planet might have some wisdom to impart on the intersection of education and energy. While our inquiry may have veered into the realm of whimsy, we firmly believe that a sprinkle of childhood nostalgia can infuse any study with a jolt of creativity.
Armed with an eclectic mix of scholarly works, literary parallels, and nostalgic musings, we set out to untangle the electrifying link between the number of 4th-grade public school students and electricity generation in Paraguay. It's safe to say we've been positively charged about this investigation, and we're voltage ourselves in the findings we are about to present.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected revealed a striking correlation between the number of public school students in 4th grade and electricity generation in Paraguay. The correlation coefficient of 0.9043858 indicated a remarkably strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8179138, denoting that approximately 81.79% of the variability in electricity generation in Paraguay could be explained by the number of 4th-grade public school students. The p-value of less than 0.01 reinforced the statistical significance of this correlation, suggesting that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship by chance was exceedingly low.
As seen in Fig. 1, the scatterplot graphically depicts the robust correlation between the number of 4th-grade public school students and electricity generation in Paraguay. Each data point on the plot serves as a testament to the compelling interconnection between these variables, defying conventional expectations and leaving us rather energized by the revelation.
The observed correlation prompts an exploration into the underlying mechanisms that may give rise to this unexpected relationship. While it may seem shocking at first, it is essential to consider the potential factors contributing to this connection. Could it be the collective brainpower of 4th graders stimulating the creative energy behind electricity generation? Or perhaps the educational infrastructure plays a direct role in shaping the country's approach to energy production? These intriguing questions merit further investigation and may provide enlightening insights into the intricate nexus between education and electricity generation.
Our findings challenge the traditional boundaries of understanding and emphasize the need for interdisciplinary exploration. The integration of educational and energy policies may hold untapped potential for enhancing both academic outcomes and sustainable energy practices. This study serves as a catalyst for sparking dialogue and igniting curiosity about the unexpected intersections in our world. After all, who would have thought that the bright minds of 4th-grade students could be so powerfully linked to the generation of electricity in Paraguay? It’s a shocking discovery that leaves us both electrified and eager to delve further into the captivating realm of cross-disciplinary research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study offer a shocking revelation – the number of public school students in 4th grade has a positively charged association with electricity generation in Paraguay. Our findings not only validate prior research but also illuminate a fascinating intersection between education and energy that has been overlooked until now. As we embark on the discussion of these results, we must resist the temptation to become too electrified with excitement (pun intended), and instead ground ourselves in a critical examination of the implications of this unexpected correlation.

Our journey through the literature review hinted at the unexpected depth of this connection. While the link between 4th-grade students and electricity generation might seem far-fetched, previous works have subtly hinted at the potential influence of education on energy-related socio-cultural determinants. We cannot overlook the inspiration we drew from the likes of Captain Planet and Ms. Frizzle, whose whimsical worlds surprisingly nudged us towards a serious investigation into the intertwining realms of education and energy. The connection between these seemingly disparate fields proves that inspiration can strike from the most unexpected sources, reminding us that even the boundless energy of childhood imagination has a place in academic inquiry.

Building upon the existing scholarly groundwork, our results reaffirm the notion that educational landscapes may wield a considerable impact on a nation's approach to energy generation. The strong correlation coefficient and the statistically significant p-value underscore the tangible relationship between these variables. Despite the initial shock of this discovery, we are now at a pivotal juncture where further exploration of the mechanisms underlying this relationship is essential. It’s not every day that one stumbles upon a correlation as striking as the one we have uncovered, and yet, we must resist the urge to jump to electricity-powered conclusions. Instead, we are compelled to delve deeper into the causal factors that could underlie this abrupt and electrifying connection.

As we grapple with the implications of our findings, it becomes clear that interdisciplinary collaboration between the spheres of education and energy policy holds promise for driving both sustainable energy practices and scholastic achievement. The potential amplification of learning outcomes through an enhanced understanding of energy generation and consumption represents a current of thought-provoking possibilities (pun absolutely intended). Furthermore, our study serves as a current catalyst, igniting both curiosity and discussion around these unanticipated intersections. The statistical currents may be flowing strong, but it’s the scholarly implications that truly electrify us.

In closing this discussion, we are charged with a renewed sense of curiosity and an eager anticipation for the future avenues of research that our findings beckon. The electrifying link between 4th-grade public school students and electricity generation in Paraguay has sparked a surge of excitement within the academic community, reinforcing the idea that seemingly unrelated fields might hold the key to unlocking a new dimension of understanding. As our study leaves us positively charged with optimism for future exploration, we transition towards the uncharted territory of potential implications and practical applications of our revelatory discovery. It's truly an electrifying time to be at the forefront of this shocking confluence of education and energy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 4th grade and Electricity generation in Paraguay. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Link Between Public School Students and Electricity Generation in Paraguay"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this electrifying study, we investigate the captivating relationship between the number of public school students in 4th grade and electricity generation in Paraguay. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we unveiled a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9043858 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may be a spark of connection between the educational landscape and the electricity sector in Paraguay. This research sheds light on the unexplored relationship between academic pursuits and electrical power, illuminating the potential for future studies to delve into the high-voltage world of education and energy generation.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, some connections may seem more far-fetched than others. It’s not every day that one stumbles upon a correlation as unexpected as the one we present in this paper. As researchers, we are accustomed to exploring relationships between variables that, at first glance, may appear unrelated. However, our latest venture into the world of statistical analysis has left us both electrified and amused by the surprising link we have unearthed – the connection between the number of 4th-grade public school students and electricity generation in Paraguay.
On the surface, one might be inclined to believe that these two phenomena reside in separate realms, never to intersect. However, as the saying goes, "Ohm is where the heart is," and we were determined to ohm in on any potential relationship, no matter how shocking it may seem.
Paraguay, a landlocked country in South America known for its rich cultural heritage and stunning landscapes, also boasts a unique energy profile, mainly due to its extensive hydroelectric power generation capacity. Meanwhile, its education system, like that of many other nations, is tasked with nurturing the minds of its young students. But could there be more to these seemingly distinct features of Paraguay’s societal landscape than meets the eye?
Before delving into our findings, it is imperative to acknowledge the inherent skepticism that one might hold regarding the plausibility of such a connection. After all, the thought of a 4th-grade classroom directly influencing the generation of electricity may sound preposterous to the uninitiated. However, as researchers, we are no strangers to challenging conventional wisdom and unearthing unexpected relationships – after all, research is all about making those "ohm-grown" discoveries!
In the coming sections, we will elucidate the methodology employed, present our discerning findings, and delve into the implications of this striking correlation. So, buckle up and prepare to be illuminated by the gleaming insights that this research has to offer! After all, it’s not every day that a study leaves you feeling amped up about the world of statistical analysis.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected revealed a striking correlation between the number of public school students in 4th grade and electricity generation in Paraguay. The correlation coefficient of 0.9043858 indicated a remarkably strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8179138, denoting that approximately 81.79% of the variability in electricity generation in Paraguay could be explained by the number of 4th-grade public school students. The p-value of less than 0.01 reinforced the statistical significance of this correlation, suggesting that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship by chance was exceedingly low.
As seen in Fig. 1, the scatterplot graphically depicts the robust correlation between the number of 4th-grade public school students and electricity generation in Paraguay. Each data point on the plot serves as a testament to the compelling interconnection between these variables, defying conventional expectations and leaving us rather energized by the revelation.
The observed correlation prompts an exploration into the underlying mechanisms that may give rise to this unexpected relationship. While it may seem shocking at first, it is essential to consider the potential factors contributing to this connection. Could it be the collective brainpower of 4th graders stimulating the creative energy behind electricity generation? Or perhaps the educational infrastructure plays a direct role in shaping the country's approach to energy production? These intriguing questions merit further investigation and may provide enlightening insights into the intricate nexus between education and electricity generation.
Our findings challenge the traditional boundaries of understanding and emphasize the need for interdisciplinary exploration. The integration of educational and energy policies may hold untapped potential for enhancing both academic outcomes and sustainable energy practices. This study serves as a catalyst for sparking dialogue and igniting curiosity about the unexpected intersections in our world. After all, who would have thought that the bright minds of 4th-grade students could be so powerfully linked to the generation of electricity in Paraguay? It’s a shocking discovery that leaves us both electrified and eager to delve further into the captivating realm of cross-disciplinary research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has illuminated a shockingly strong correlation between the number of 4th-grade public school students and electricity generation in Paraguay. The results have left us amped up and buzzing with curiosity about the underlying mechanisms at play. While our findings may seem positively electric, it’s essential to recognize the potential for confounding variables, as we wouldn’t want to short-circuit our interpretation of the data.

The implications of this unexpected relationship spark new questions and open up a world of exploration. It seems that the youthful vigor of 4th graders may just be the jolt needed to power up Paraguay’s electricity generation. Who would have thought that the future of energy relied on the intellectual voltage of young minds?

We believe our work adds a bright spark to the literature and sheds light on the potential interplay between educational development and sustainable energy production. It’s a field rife with potential and one that future researchers should not be dim-witted to overlook.

In conclusion, it’s clear that the energy behind this research is truly electrifying. However, after delving deeply into this captivating correlation, we can confidently assert that no further research in this area is needed. It’s a shocking conclusion, but sometimes, you just have to let the current flow and move on to new frontiers of inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Link Between Public School Students and Electricity Generation in Paraguay. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eclectic Energies and Educational Electricity


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Link Between Public School Students and Electricity Generation in Paraguay. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Shocking Connections: The Electrifying Link Between Public School Students and Electricity Generation in Paraguay with an abstract of In this electrifying study, we investigate the captivating relationship between the number of public school students in 4th grade and electricity generation in Paraguay. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we unveiled a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9043858 and p < 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021. Our findings suggest that there may be a spark of connection between the educational landscape and the electricity sector in Paraguay. This research sheds light on the unexplored relationship between academic pursuits and electrical power, illuminating the potential for future studies to delve into the high-voltage world of education and energy generation.

ChatGPT:

Paraguay, public school students, electricity generation, correlation coefficient, National Center for Education Statistics, Energy Information Administration, academic pursuits, educational landscape, energy sector, electricity consumption, education policy, electricity production, Paraguay education, energy consumption, electricity correlation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Number of public school students in 4th grade
Detailed data title: 4th grade enrollment in public elementary and secondary schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Number of public school students in 4th grade

Electricity generation in Paraguay
Detailed data title: Total electricity generation in Paraguay in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Electricity generation in Paraguay

Correlation r = 0.9043858 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8179138 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Electricity generation in Paraguay) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Number of public school students in 4th grade) over the 32 years from 1990 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.3E-12. 0.0000000000012723016916391069
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 1.3E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 785,977,104,779 random variables You don't actually need 785 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 31 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 31 because we have two variables measured over a period of 32 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Number of public school students in 4th grade (Students)32480603314930334174033611103425950343058034537703507460359215036863703711430369490036685203619090361164035775103585890362438036469003700530371134036718603690220370773037188703792740385844038594803777400370564036068603550200
Electricity generation in Paraguay (Billion kWh)27.22929.3927.18131.16736.07141.75744.91550.450.42251.44952.96944.87647.74451.269351.41750.65753.24953.19154.91254.4153.524957.049959.632859.904854.867655.332963.302959.229958.753849.072646.50940.0231




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3248060,3314930,3341740,3361110,3425950,3430580,3453770,3507460,3592150,3686370,3711430,3694900,3668520,3619090,3611640,3577510,3585890,3624380,3646900,3700530,3711340,3671860,3690220,3707730,3718870,3792740,3858440,3859480,3777400,3705640,3606860,3550200,])
array_2 = np.array([27.229,29.39,27.181,31.167,36.071,41.757,44.915,50.4,50.422,51.449,52.969,44.876,47.744,51.2693,51.417,50.657,53.249,53.191,54.912,54.41,53.5249,57.0499,59.6328,59.9048,54.8676,55.3329,63.3029,59.2299,58.7538,49.0726,46.509,40.0231,])
array_1_name = "Number of public school students in 4th grade"
array_2_name = "Electricity generation in Paraguay"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 1791 · Black Variable ID: 1301 · Red Variable ID: 23892
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0