about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,625 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is UFO sightings in Kentucky and the second variable is Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion.  The chart goes from 1979 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

There's a direct link between Kentucky UFO sightings and the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's intake. You see, the UFOs were beaming down some next-level condiments, giving the hotdogs an otherworldly flavor! It's like they say, when it comes to hotdog toppings, the sky's the limit!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a surreal scene capturing a clear night sky over Kentucky, with a shimmering UFO hovering above. Below, in a crowded stadium, the newly crowned Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion gleefully devours a mountain of hot dogs, surrounded by cheering spectators. The UFO's iridescent glow beautifully contrasts with the excitement of the hot dog eating competition below. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: UFO sightings in Kentucky and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Minimalism Cubism Minimalism A Discovery magazine cover image Data cyber art
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both UFO sightings in Kentucky and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a clear night sky over Kentucky, a shimmering UFO hovers while, on the ground below, the newly crowned Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion happily devours a mountain of hotdogs in a crowded stadium.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a clear night sky over Kentucky, a shimmering UFO hovers while, on the ground below, the newly crowned Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion happily devours a mountain of hotdogs in a crowded stadium. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a surreal scene capturing a clear night sky over Kentucky, with a shimmering UFO hovering above. Below, in a crowded stadium, the newly crowned Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion gleefully devours a mountain of hot dogs, surrounded by cheering spectators. The UFO's iridescent glow beautifully contrasts with the excitement of the hot dog eating competition below.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in UFO sightings in Kentucky positively influenced Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Unearthly Union: Unraveling the Unlikely Correlation between UFO Sightings in Kentucky and the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

Journal of Extraterrestrial Gastronomy

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Kentucky and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8832279 and p < 0.01 for 1979 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Unearthly Union: Unraveling the Unlikely Correlation between UFO Sightings in Kentucky and the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into an out-of-this-world phenomenon, investigating the peculiar relationship between the frequency of UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky and the amount of hotdogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In our quest for cosmic connections, we analyzed data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia to shed light on this enigmatic correlation. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8832279 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1979 to 2021, prompting further investigation into this unexpected linkage.

As we sifted through countless reports of UFO sightings and hotdog consumption statistics, we couldn't help but wonder if there was a "supernatural sausage yield" at play. (Cue the groans and eye rolls.) The data presented itself as a cosmic jigsaw puzzle, with each UFO sighting fitting eerily well with spikes in hotdog consumption by the esteemed Nathan's champion. It's safe to say that we were grappling with issues of universal magnitude here.

Our research opens up a veritable Pandora's bun, raising questions about the potential influence of extraterrestrial visitors on competitive eating events. The implications of this otherworldly hotdog hypothesis are far-reaching, challenging traditional notions of cause and effect. Our findings beckon us to consider the cosmic factors at play in the seemingly terrestrial realm of competitive eating, leaving us to ponder whether there might be some "space-age relish" involved in the phenomenon. Rest assured, we'll continue our pursuit of understanding this celestial frankfurter connection, armed with a touch of humor and a side of skepticism. After all, it's a hotdog-eat-UFO world out there.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Kentucky and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Unearthly Union: Unraveling the Unlikely Correlation between UFO Sightings in Kentucky and the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into an out-of-this-world phenomenon, investigating the peculiar relationship between the frequency of UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky and the amount of hotdogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In our quest for cosmic connections, we analyzed data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia to shed light on this enigmatic correlation. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8832279 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1979 to 2021, prompting further investigation into this unexpected linkage.

As we sifted through countless reports of UFO sightings and hotdog consumption statistics, we couldn't help but wonder if there was a "supernatural sausage yield" at play. (Cue the groans and eye rolls.) The data presented itself as a cosmic jigsaw puzzle, with each UFO sighting fitting eerily well with spikes in hotdog consumption by the esteemed Nathan's champion. It's safe to say that we were grappling with issues of universal magnitude here.

Our research opens up a veritable Pandora's bun, raising questions about the potential influence of extraterrestrial visitors on competitive eating events. The implications of this otherworldly hotdog hypothesis are far-reaching, challenging traditional notions of cause and effect. Our findings beckon us to consider the cosmic factors at play in the seemingly terrestrial realm of competitive eating, leaving us to ponder whether there might be some "space-age relish" involved in the phenomenon. Rest assured, we'll continue our pursuit of understanding this celestial frankfurter connection, armed with a touch of humor and a side of skepticism. After all, it's a hotdog-eat-UFO world out there.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the annals of scientific inquiry, certain serendipitous discoveries have left researchers grappling with perplexing puzzles that defy conventional explanation. Our current investigation, whilst seemingly light-hearted, delves into an arcane convergence that spans the reaches of the cosmos and the backyard barbecue - the peculiar correlation between UFO sightings in the heartland of Kentucky and the prodigious consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Yes, folks, you read that correctly - we're embarking on a journey that links the unknown depths of the galaxy to the devouring of frankfurters, and we aren't just relishing in the puns.

As the age-old saying goes, "We're not alone in the universe, but are we alone in our love for hot dogs?" (No apologies for that one.) To bring to light this esoteric and somewhat comical correlation, we've harnessed the power of data analysis, statistical methods, and a healthy dose of banter to reveal the mysteries that lie behind this unanticipated tandem. Our approach, while unorthodox, retains the core principles of rigorous research, despite the intergalactic flavor of our subject matter.

The aim of our research is not just to tickle the scientific community's funny bone with this cosmic hotdog connection, but to earnestly investigate the implications of a correlation that most would consider, well, quite "alien" in nature. Acknowledging the disbelief plastered on the faces of our esteemed colleagues, we press on undeterred by the skepticism, knowing that we tread on the precipice of something revolutionary and, quite possibly, a little absurd.

This study is intended to challenge the conventional boundaries of what is considered scientifically plausible, prompting us to consider the notion that there may be more to the universe than we dare to mustard. (Pun intended, of course.) We invite readers to join us on this saucy journey as we chew through the data, nibble on the possibilities, and brace ourselves for the cosmic revelations that await. For as we playfully hypothesize, perhaps the truth isn't out there, but right under our noses, wedged in between a bun.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Kentucky and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Unearthly Union: Unraveling the Unlikely Correlation between UFO Sightings in Kentucky and the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into an out-of-this-world phenomenon, investigating the peculiar relationship between the frequency of UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky and the amount of hotdogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In our quest for cosmic connections, we analyzed data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia to shed light on this enigmatic correlation. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8832279 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1979 to 2021, prompting further investigation into this unexpected linkage.

As we sifted through countless reports of UFO sightings and hotdog consumption statistics, we couldn't help but wonder if there was a "supernatural sausage yield" at play. (Cue the groans and eye rolls.) The data presented itself as a cosmic jigsaw puzzle, with each UFO sighting fitting eerily well with spikes in hotdog consumption by the esteemed Nathan's champion. It's safe to say that we were grappling with issues of universal magnitude here.

Our research opens up a veritable Pandora's bun, raising questions about the potential influence of extraterrestrial visitors on competitive eating events. The implications of this otherworldly hotdog hypothesis are far-reaching, challenging traditional notions of cause and effect. Our findings beckon us to consider the cosmic factors at play in the seemingly terrestrial realm of competitive eating, leaving us to ponder whether there might be some "space-age relish" involved in the phenomenon. Rest assured, we'll continue our pursuit of understanding this celestial frankfurter connection, armed with a touch of humor and a side of skepticism. After all, it's a hotdog-eat-UFO world out there.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the annals of scientific inquiry, certain serendipitous discoveries have left researchers grappling with perplexing puzzles that defy conventional explanation. Our current investigation, whilst seemingly light-hearted, delves into an arcane convergence that spans the reaches of the cosmos and the backyard barbecue - the peculiar correlation between UFO sightings in the heartland of Kentucky and the prodigious consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Yes, folks, you read that correctly - we're embarking on a journey that links the unknown depths of the galaxy to the devouring of frankfurters, and we aren't just relishing in the puns.
As the age-old saying goes, "We're not alone in the universe, but are we alone in our love for hot dogs?" (No apologies for that one.) To bring to light this esoteric and somewhat comical correlation, we've harnessed the power of data analysis, statistical methods, and a healthy dose of banter to reveal the mysteries that lie behind this unanticipated tandem. Our approach, while unorthodox, retains the core principles of rigorous research, despite the intergalactic flavor of our subject matter.
The aim of our research is not just to tickle the scientific community's funny bone with this cosmic hotdog connection, but to earnestly investigate the implications of a correlation that most would consider, well, quite "alien" in nature. Acknowledging the disbelief plastered on the faces of our esteemed colleagues, we press on undeterred by the skepticism, knowing that we tread on the precipice of something revolutionary and, quite possibly, a little absurd.
This study is intended to challenge the conventional boundaries of what is considered scientifically plausible, prompting us to consider the notion that there may be more to the universe than we dare to mustard. (Pun intended, of course.) We invite readers to join us on this saucy journey as we chew through the data, nibble on the possibilities, and brace ourselves for the cosmic revelations that await. For as we playfully hypothesize, perhaps the truth isn't out there, but right under our noses, wedged in between a bun.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we wade into uncharted research territory, the literature on the correlation between UFO sightings and unusual culinary phenomena is limited, to say the least. However, the few scholarly works that do touch on the intersection of otherworldly visitations and the consumption of processed meats offer intriguing insights.

In "Extraterrestrial Eats: A Culinary Inquiry into Alien Encounters," Smith traces historical accounts of UFO sightings to remote locations famous for their unique culinary traditions, suggesting a potential connection between otherworldly beings and earthly delicacies. Doe, in "Unidentified Flying Ovens: Baking Secrets from Beyond the Stars," delves into the role of baking in alien visitations and presents a speculative, tongue-in-cheek theory on the interstellar influence on human food consumption.

But now it’s time for a real saucy joke. What do you call a stolen hot dog? A Frank-furter!

Turning our attention to non-fiction books outside the academic sphere, "The Complete Guide to Alien Cuisine" by A. E. T. explores intergalactic gastronomy and its potential impact on terrestrial food trends. Meanwhile, "Close Encounters of the Tasty Kind: A Cookbook for Cosmic Cooking" by H. G. A. Wells delves into the culinary inclinations of extraterrestrial beings, hinting at a possible connection to competitive eating events.

Let’s relish in another dad joke, shall we? What do you give a sick bird? Medical tweetment!

As we venture further into the realm of speculative fiction, "The Martian Hotdog Chronicles" by R. A. T. Bradbury leaves readers pondering the influence of extraterrestrial forces on human food consumption, albeit in a light-hearted and fantastical setting. And who could forget "A Wrinkle in Thyme: Culinary Adventures through the Space-Time Continuum" by M. L. Engle, a whimsical tale that weaves together interstellar travel and interdimensional cooking.

Time for another pun - we can't resist! Why did the hot dog turn down a chance to perform on stage? It didn't want to be booed off!

Finally, our literature review did not exclude an exhaustive examination of unconventional sources. While some may raise an eyebrow at our methods, we confess to gathering insights from an unconventional array of texts, including the inscriptions on hotdog packaging, the musings of conspiracy theorists on internet forums, and, for comic relief, the backs of shampoo bottles during late-night research sessions.

In "Shampoo-Bottle Revelations: A Comedic Analysis of Bathroom Literature," we came across a particularly enlightening passage about the potential link between extraterrestrial technology and the optimal hotdog condiment-to-bun ratio, sparking much amusement and also a hint of culinary conspiracy.

That's all for now. We hope you enjoyed our intergalactic exploration through literature!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Kentucky and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia . You used data from 1979 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Unearthly Union: Unraveling the Unlikely Correlation between UFO Sightings in Kentucky and the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into an out-of-this-world phenomenon, investigating the peculiar relationship between the frequency of UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky and the amount of hotdogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In our quest for cosmic connections, we analyzed data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia to shed light on this enigmatic correlation. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8832279 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1979 to 2021, prompting further investigation into this unexpected linkage.

As we sifted through countless reports of UFO sightings and hotdog consumption statistics, we couldn't help but wonder if there was a "supernatural sausage yield" at play. (Cue the groans and eye rolls.) The data presented itself as a cosmic jigsaw puzzle, with each UFO sighting fitting eerily well with spikes in hotdog consumption by the esteemed Nathan's champion. It's safe to say that we were grappling with issues of universal magnitude here.

Our research opens up a veritable Pandora's bun, raising questions about the potential influence of extraterrestrial visitors on competitive eating events. The implications of this otherworldly hotdog hypothesis are far-reaching, challenging traditional notions of cause and effect. Our findings beckon us to consider the cosmic factors at play in the seemingly terrestrial realm of competitive eating, leaving us to ponder whether there might be some "space-age relish" involved in the phenomenon. Rest assured, we'll continue our pursuit of understanding this celestial frankfurter connection, armed with a touch of humor and a side of skepticism. After all, it's a hotdog-eat-UFO world out there.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the annals of scientific inquiry, certain serendipitous discoveries have left researchers grappling with perplexing puzzles that defy conventional explanation. Our current investigation, whilst seemingly light-hearted, delves into an arcane convergence that spans the reaches of the cosmos and the backyard barbecue - the peculiar correlation between UFO sightings in the heartland of Kentucky and the prodigious consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Yes, folks, you read that correctly - we're embarking on a journey that links the unknown depths of the galaxy to the devouring of frankfurters, and we aren't just relishing in the puns.
As the age-old saying goes, "We're not alone in the universe, but are we alone in our love for hot dogs?" (No apologies for that one.) To bring to light this esoteric and somewhat comical correlation, we've harnessed the power of data analysis, statistical methods, and a healthy dose of banter to reveal the mysteries that lie behind this unanticipated tandem. Our approach, while unorthodox, retains the core principles of rigorous research, despite the intergalactic flavor of our subject matter.
The aim of our research is not just to tickle the scientific community's funny bone with this cosmic hotdog connection, but to earnestly investigate the implications of a correlation that most would consider, well, quite "alien" in nature. Acknowledging the disbelief plastered on the faces of our esteemed colleagues, we press on undeterred by the skepticism, knowing that we tread on the precipice of something revolutionary and, quite possibly, a little absurd.
This study is intended to challenge the conventional boundaries of what is considered scientifically plausible, prompting us to consider the notion that there may be more to the universe than we dare to mustard. (Pun intended, of course.) We invite readers to join us on this saucy journey as we chew through the data, nibble on the possibilities, and brace ourselves for the cosmic revelations that await. For as we playfully hypothesize, perhaps the truth isn't out there, but right under our noses, wedged in between a bun.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

Ahoy there, fellow cosmic connoisseurs! In this unorthodox but deliciously delightful section of our expedition, we outline the peculiar methodology wielded in our quest to untangle the otherworldly mysteries surrounding the correlation between UFO sightings in Kentucky and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion's hotdog consumption. Strap on your seatbelts, folks; we're about to embark on a research journey that's as whimsical as it is scientific.

To munch on this mind-boggling quandary, our data sleuths scoured the internet, turning to the National UFO Reporting Center and the trusty old Wikipedia for a smorgasbord of UFO sightings and hotdog devouring statistics from the years 1979 through 2021. As the saying goes, when in doubt, consult Wikipedia! Now, let's ketchup with our methodology, shall we? (Apologies for the corny condiment joke – it was just too appetizing to resist!)

To chew through the cosmic data at our fingertips, we employed a statistical analysis that could rival the mathematics of the cosmos. We calculated the correlation coefficient between the frequency of UFO sightings in Kentucky and the champion's hotdog consumption with the precision of an astrophysicist charting the movements of celestial bodies - or perhaps more accurately, the trajectory of mustard squirts. (Yes, folks, we just went there with a condiment-based joke!)

Our approach also took into account the temporal dynamics of these celestial munching shenanigans, utilizing time-series analysis to discern any temporal patterns that may have been hiding in the data like aliens in a cornfield. We sought to, quite literally, "sausage out" any telltale signs of synchronicity between UFO sightings and hotdog chomping to truly grasp the magnitude of this cosmic connection. (Yep, another sausage-related pun – we can't help ourselves!)

With the aid of sophisticated statistical software and a dash of good humor, we meticulously assessed the significance of the correlation by conducting hypothesis tests, probing the data to determine whether the connection between these disparate variables was merely a celestial fluke or a genuinely unearthly union. Our statistical artillery was aimed at uncovering the truth behind this celestial frankfurter enigma, armed with wit and, of course, an unabashed love for a good pun.

So there you have it, folks. Our research recipe for revealing the peculiar correlation between UFO sightings in Kentucky and the reigning hotdog-eating champion's voracious appetite. While the road has been peppered with data points and puns alike, our findings promise to deliver a scientific yet light-hearted perspective on this mysterious astronomical hotdog affair. Join us as we relish the journey, poised to shed light on the cosmic interplay between UFO sightings and hotdog consumption, one statistical bite at a time.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Kentucky and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1979 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8832279, r-squared of 0.7800914, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Unearthly Union: Unraveling the Unlikely Correlation between UFO Sightings in Kentucky and the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into an out-of-this-world phenomenon, investigating the peculiar relationship between the frequency of UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky and the amount of hotdogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In our quest for cosmic connections, we analyzed data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia to shed light on this enigmatic correlation. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8832279 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1979 to 2021, prompting further investigation into this unexpected linkage.

As we sifted through countless reports of UFO sightings and hotdog consumption statistics, we couldn't help but wonder if there was a "supernatural sausage yield" at play. (Cue the groans and eye rolls.) The data presented itself as a cosmic jigsaw puzzle, with each UFO sighting fitting eerily well with spikes in hotdog consumption by the esteemed Nathan's champion. It's safe to say that we were grappling with issues of universal magnitude here.

Our research opens up a veritable Pandora's bun, raising questions about the potential influence of extraterrestrial visitors on competitive eating events. The implications of this otherworldly hotdog hypothesis are far-reaching, challenging traditional notions of cause and effect. Our findings beckon us to consider the cosmic factors at play in the seemingly terrestrial realm of competitive eating, leaving us to ponder whether there might be some "space-age relish" involved in the phenomenon. Rest assured, we'll continue our pursuit of understanding this celestial frankfurter connection, armed with a touch of humor and a side of skepticism. After all, it's a hotdog-eat-UFO world out there.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the annals of scientific inquiry, certain serendipitous discoveries have left researchers grappling with perplexing puzzles that defy conventional explanation. Our current investigation, whilst seemingly light-hearted, delves into an arcane convergence that spans the reaches of the cosmos and the backyard barbecue - the peculiar correlation between UFO sightings in the heartland of Kentucky and the prodigious consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Yes, folks, you read that correctly - we're embarking on a journey that links the unknown depths of the galaxy to the devouring of frankfurters, and we aren't just relishing in the puns.
As the age-old saying goes, "We're not alone in the universe, but are we alone in our love for hot dogs?" (No apologies for that one.) To bring to light this esoteric and somewhat comical correlation, we've harnessed the power of data analysis, statistical methods, and a healthy dose of banter to reveal the mysteries that lie behind this unanticipated tandem. Our approach, while unorthodox, retains the core principles of rigorous research, despite the intergalactic flavor of our subject matter.
The aim of our research is not just to tickle the scientific community's funny bone with this cosmic hotdog connection, but to earnestly investigate the implications of a correlation that most would consider, well, quite "alien" in nature. Acknowledging the disbelief plastered on the faces of our esteemed colleagues, we press on undeterred by the skepticism, knowing that we tread on the precipice of something revolutionary and, quite possibly, a little absurd.
This study is intended to challenge the conventional boundaries of what is considered scientifically plausible, prompting us to consider the notion that there may be more to the universe than we dare to mustard. (Pun intended, of course.) We invite readers to join us on this saucy journey as we chew through the data, nibble on the possibilities, and brace ourselves for the cosmic revelations that await. For as we playfully hypothesize, perhaps the truth isn't out there, but right under our noses, wedged in between a bun.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

We delved deep into the data, fiercely determined to unravel the mysteries lying within the cosmos and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Our exploratory analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8832279 between the frequency of UFO sightings in Kentucky and the consumption of hot dogs by the revered competition champion. It seems that the celestial and the culinary have inexplicably intertwined, leading to a statistical riddle that still leaves us wondering if it was all just a UFO-no.

The correlation, represented by an r-squared value of 0.7800914, indicates that a substantial portion of the variation in hot dog consumption can be explained by the occurrence of UFO sightings. Perhaps there's more to these unidentified flying objects than meets the "frankfurter"! (Pardon the pun – we couldn't resist.) The statistical evidence certainly suggests a substantial relationship, raising questions about the cosmic forces at play in the world of competitive eating.

We illustrated our findings visually through the inclusion of a scatterplot (Fig. 1), which elegantly showcases the robust relationship between the variables. As the data points coalesce on the graph, it becomes evident that there's more to this otherworldly hotdog hypothesis than meets the eye.

It's worth noting the p-value of less than 0.01, further bolstering the evidence in support of this peculiar, yet palpable, correlation. As unlikely as it may seem, our results prompt us to reconsider our preconceptions about the influence of interstellar activities on earthly endeavors, especially those involving processed meat. Could it be that the truth really is out there, nestled between a bite of a hot dog and the passing of a UFO? It seems that the universe has a cosmic appetite for enigmatic connections. Perhaps, in this case, "conspiracy theory" is a bit more literal than we thought!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Kentucky and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Unearthly Union: Unraveling the Unlikely Correlation between UFO Sightings in Kentucky and the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into an out-of-this-world phenomenon, investigating the peculiar relationship between the frequency of UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky and the amount of hotdogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In our quest for cosmic connections, we analyzed data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia to shed light on this enigmatic correlation. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8832279 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1979 to 2021, prompting further investigation into this unexpected linkage.

As we sifted through countless reports of UFO sightings and hotdog consumption statistics, we couldn't help but wonder if there was a "supernatural sausage yield" at play. (Cue the groans and eye rolls.) The data presented itself as a cosmic jigsaw puzzle, with each UFO sighting fitting eerily well with spikes in hotdog consumption by the esteemed Nathan's champion. It's safe to say that we were grappling with issues of universal magnitude here.

Our research opens up a veritable Pandora's bun, raising questions about the potential influence of extraterrestrial visitors on competitive eating events. The implications of this otherworldly hotdog hypothesis are far-reaching, challenging traditional notions of cause and effect. Our findings beckon us to consider the cosmic factors at play in the seemingly terrestrial realm of competitive eating, leaving us to ponder whether there might be some "space-age relish" involved in the phenomenon. Rest assured, we'll continue our pursuit of understanding this celestial frankfurter connection, armed with a touch of humor and a side of skepticism. After all, it's a hotdog-eat-UFO world out there.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we wade into uncharted research territory, the literature on the correlation between UFO sightings and unusual culinary phenomena is limited, to say the least. However, the few scholarly works that do touch on the intersection of otherworldly visitations and the consumption of processed meats offer intriguing insights.
In "Extraterrestrial Eats: A Culinary Inquiry into Alien Encounters," Smith traces historical accounts of UFO sightings to remote locations famous for their unique culinary traditions, suggesting a potential connection between otherworldly beings and earthly delicacies. Doe, in "Unidentified Flying Ovens: Baking Secrets from Beyond the Stars," delves into the role of baking in alien visitations and presents a speculative, tongue-in-cheek theory on the interstellar influence on human food consumption.
But now it’s time for a real saucy joke. What do you call a stolen hot dog? A Frank-furter!
Turning our attention to non-fiction books outside the academic sphere, "The Complete Guide to Alien Cuisine" by A. E. T. explores intergalactic gastronomy and its potential impact on terrestrial food trends. Meanwhile, "Close Encounters of the Tasty Kind: A Cookbook for Cosmic Cooking" by H. G. A. Wells delves into the culinary inclinations of extraterrestrial beings, hinting at a possible connection to competitive eating events.
Let’s relish in another dad joke, shall we? What do you give a sick bird? Medical tweetment!
As we venture further into the realm of speculative fiction, "The Martian Hotdog Chronicles" by R. A. T. Bradbury leaves readers pondering the influence of extraterrestrial forces on human food consumption, albeit in a light-hearted and fantastical setting. And who could forget "A Wrinkle in Thyme: Culinary Adventures through the Space-Time Continuum" by M. L. Engle, a whimsical tale that weaves together interstellar travel and interdimensional cooking.
Time for another pun - we can't resist! Why did the hot dog turn down a chance to perform on stage? It didn't want to be booed off!
Finally, our literature review did not exclude an exhaustive examination of unconventional sources. While some may raise an eyebrow at our methods, we confess to gathering insights from an unconventional array of texts, including the inscriptions on hotdog packaging, the musings of conspiracy theorists on internet forums, and, for comic relief, the backs of shampoo bottles during late-night research sessions.
In "Shampoo-Bottle Revelations: A Comedic Analysis of Bathroom Literature," we came across a particularly enlightening passage about the potential link between extraterrestrial technology and the optimal hotdog condiment-to-bun ratio, sparking much amusement and also a hint of culinary conspiracy.
That's all for now. We hope you enjoyed our intergalactic exploration through literature!

[[RESULTS]]
We delved deep into the data, fiercely determined to unravel the mysteries lying within the cosmos and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Our exploratory analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8832279 between the frequency of UFO sightings in Kentucky and the consumption of hot dogs by the revered competition champion. It seems that the celestial and the culinary have inexplicably intertwined, leading to a statistical riddle that still leaves us wondering if it was all just a UFO-no.
The correlation, represented by an r-squared value of 0.7800914, indicates that a substantial portion of the variation in hot dog consumption can be explained by the occurrence of UFO sightings. Perhaps there's more to these unidentified flying objects than meets the "frankfurter"! (Pardon the pun – we couldn't resist.) The statistical evidence certainly suggests a substantial relationship, raising questions about the cosmic forces at play in the world of competitive eating.
We illustrated our findings visually through the inclusion of a scatterplot (Fig. 1), which elegantly showcases the robust relationship between the variables. As the data points coalesce on the graph, it becomes evident that there's more to this otherworldly hotdog hypothesis than meets the eye.
It's worth noting the p-value of less than 0.01, further bolstering the evidence in support of this peculiar, yet palpable, correlation. As unlikely as it may seem, our results prompt us to reconsider our preconceptions about the influence of interstellar activities on earthly endeavors, especially those involving processed meat. Could it be that the truth really is out there, nestled between a bite of a hot dog and the passing of a UFO? It seems that the universe has a cosmic appetite for enigmatic connections. Perhaps, in this case, "conspiracy theory" is a bit more literal than we thought!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Oh boy, where to begin with this cosmic hotdog caper? Our findings have managed to flip the lid off the relish jar, revealing a correlation between UFO sightings in Kentucky and the insatiable appetite of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champion. It's like a wild sci-fi novel come to life, or perhaps an episode of The X-Files, but with hotdogs as the cryptic clue. Mulder and Scully, move over – it's time for "The Frankfurter Files."

Our results not only confirm but further elucidate the unearthly connection hinted at by previous scholarly works. The statistically robust correlation coefficient of 0.8832279 corroborates the notion that there's something peculiar afoot (or rather, a-pod) when it comes to UFO sightings and competitive hotdog munching. While it may sound like we're just fishing for laughs, the data doesn't lie (unlike our aforementioned saucy jokes).

Moreover, the r-squared value of 0.7800914 suggests that a significant portion of the variation in hotdog consumption can be attributed to the presence of UFO sightings. It's like we've stumbled upon the recipe for an intergalactic hotdog – hold the kraut, and add a pinch of stardust. If anyone wants to start a petition for adding a "cosmic condiment" to the Nathan's menu, count us in!

Our scatterplot (Fig. 1) paints a compelling picture of the relationship between UFO sightings and hotdog consumption, with data points converging to create a visual testament to this inexplicable linkage. It's like a celestial jigsaw puzzle falling into place, revealing a picture of Earth and its extraterrestrial visitors sharing a frankfurter under the stars.

With a p-value of less than 0.01, our results stand firm against skepticism, defying the odds and suggesting that there might be more to this seemingly outlandish correlation than meets the eye. Could it be that the cosmos has a penchant for processed meats, and our distinguished UFOs are just making pit stops for a quick bite? It's a thought that's enough to make one's "buns" quiver, isn't it?

In the grand scheme of galactic mysteries, our findings may be a mere blip, but they beckon us to reconsider the boundaries of causal relationships and expand our understanding of the cosmic influences on earthly activities. After all, who's to say that the universe doesn't have an inexplicable craving for hotdogs and competitive eating champions? As we continue to peer into the strange and surreal connections revealed by our research, we are reminded that truth can be not only stranger than fiction but also more relish-able.

Stay tuned for the kind-of-obvious follow-up study: "The Martian Marshmallow Meltdown Mystery".


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between UFO sightings in Kentucky and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Unearthly Union: Unraveling the Unlikely Correlation between UFO Sightings in Kentucky and the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into an out-of-this-world phenomenon, investigating the peculiar relationship between the frequency of UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky and the amount of hotdogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In our quest for cosmic connections, we analyzed data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia to shed light on this enigmatic correlation. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8832279 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1979 to 2021, prompting further investigation into this unexpected linkage.

As we sifted through countless reports of UFO sightings and hotdog consumption statistics, we couldn't help but wonder if there was a "supernatural sausage yield" at play. (Cue the groans and eye rolls.) The data presented itself as a cosmic jigsaw puzzle, with each UFO sighting fitting eerily well with spikes in hotdog consumption by the esteemed Nathan's champion. It's safe to say that we were grappling with issues of universal magnitude here.

Our research opens up a veritable Pandora's bun, raising questions about the potential influence of extraterrestrial visitors on competitive eating events. The implications of this otherworldly hotdog hypothesis are far-reaching, challenging traditional notions of cause and effect. Our findings beckon us to consider the cosmic factors at play in the seemingly terrestrial realm of competitive eating, leaving us to ponder whether there might be some "space-age relish" involved in the phenomenon. Rest assured, we'll continue our pursuit of understanding this celestial frankfurter connection, armed with a touch of humor and a side of skepticism. After all, it's a hotdog-eat-UFO world out there.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the annals of scientific inquiry, certain serendipitous discoveries have left researchers grappling with perplexing puzzles that defy conventional explanation. Our current investigation, whilst seemingly light-hearted, delves into an arcane convergence that spans the reaches of the cosmos and the backyard barbecue - the peculiar correlation between UFO sightings in the heartland of Kentucky and the prodigious consumption of hot dogs by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Yes, folks, you read that correctly - we're embarking on a journey that links the unknown depths of the galaxy to the devouring of frankfurters, and we aren't just relishing in the puns.
As the age-old saying goes, "We're not alone in the universe, but are we alone in our love for hot dogs?" (No apologies for that one.) To bring to light this esoteric and somewhat comical correlation, we've harnessed the power of data analysis, statistical methods, and a healthy dose of banter to reveal the mysteries that lie behind this unanticipated tandem. Our approach, while unorthodox, retains the core principles of rigorous research, despite the intergalactic flavor of our subject matter.
The aim of our research is not just to tickle the scientific community's funny bone with this cosmic hotdog connection, but to earnestly investigate the implications of a correlation that most would consider, well, quite "alien" in nature. Acknowledging the disbelief plastered on the faces of our esteemed colleagues, we press on undeterred by the skepticism, knowing that we tread on the precipice of something revolutionary and, quite possibly, a little absurd.
This study is intended to challenge the conventional boundaries of what is considered scientifically plausible, prompting us to consider the notion that there may be more to the universe than we dare to mustard. (Pun intended, of course.) We invite readers to join us on this saucy journey as we chew through the data, nibble on the possibilities, and brace ourselves for the cosmic revelations that await. For as we playfully hypothesize, perhaps the truth isn't out there, but right under our noses, wedged in between a bun.

[[RESULTS]]
We delved deep into the data, fiercely determined to unravel the mysteries lying within the cosmos and Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Our exploratory analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8832279 between the frequency of UFO sightings in Kentucky and the consumption of hot dogs by the revered competition champion. It seems that the celestial and the culinary have inexplicably intertwined, leading to a statistical riddle that still leaves us wondering if it was all just a UFO-no.
The correlation, represented by an r-squared value of 0.7800914, indicates that a substantial portion of the variation in hot dog consumption can be explained by the occurrence of UFO sightings. Perhaps there's more to these unidentified flying objects than meets the "frankfurter"! (Pardon the pun – we couldn't resist.) The statistical evidence certainly suggests a substantial relationship, raising questions about the cosmic forces at play in the world of competitive eating.
We illustrated our findings visually through the inclusion of a scatterplot (Fig. 1), which elegantly showcases the robust relationship between the variables. As the data points coalesce on the graph, it becomes evident that there's more to this otherworldly hotdog hypothesis than meets the eye.
It's worth noting the p-value of less than 0.01, further bolstering the evidence in support of this peculiar, yet palpable, correlation. As unlikely as it may seem, our results prompt us to reconsider our preconceptions about the influence of interstellar activities on earthly endeavors, especially those involving processed meat. Could it be that the truth really is out there, nestled between a bite of a hot dog and the passing of a UFO? It seems that the universe has a cosmic appetite for enigmatic connections. Perhaps, in this case, "conspiracy theory" is a bit more literal than we thought!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unearthed a correlation of cosmic proportions, linking the frequency of UFO sightings in Kentucky to the consumption of hot dogs by the illustrious Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. The statistical evidence suggests a tantalizing connection that seems to transcend the boundaries of earthly understanding. It's a phenomenon that has left us pondering whether the truth really is "out there," or perhaps right on our dinner plates – talk about food for thought! (Pun intended, as always.)

As we wrap up our investigation, it's clear that our findings have added a dash of "spice" to the scientific community's palate, serving up a platter of unexpected correlations and a healthy side of skepticism. Ultimately, our study challenges us to consider the impact of extraterrestrial influences on competitive eating events, posing a question that is perhaps more "frank" than fantastical.

In light of our revelatory findings, one might argue that we've opened a "wormhole" in the world of statistical research – one that has led us to a place where hot dogs and UFOs converge in unexpected harmony. And while our study may have left some scratching their heads, we stand by our results with relish. (Yes, we went there.)

As we close the lid on this cosmic hotdog caper, we are left with a poignant observation: sometimes the most outlandish correlations can bring us closer to understanding the universe's quirky sense of humor. In this case, it seems that the cosmos has conspired to merge the celestial and the savory in a manner that defies conventional explanation. So, for now, we bid adieu to this particular research rabbit hole because, let's face it, sometimes the truth is just too out of this world to digest.

In the immortal words of Mulder and Scully, "The truth is out there!" And in this instance, it may just be nestled between a nibble of a hot dog and the flicker of a UFO. So, with that, we assert that no more research is needed in this particular area. After all, we wouldn't want to be accused of "space-ing" on unnecessary investigations!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Unearthly Union: Unraveling the Unlikely Correlation between UFO Sightings in Kentucky and the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Extraterrestrial Gastronomy


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Unearthly Union: Unraveling the Unlikely Correlation between UFO Sightings in Kentucky and the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Intergalactic Research Consortium for Culinary Curiosities


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Unearthly Union: Unraveling the Unlikely Correlation between UFO Sightings in Kentucky and the Consumption of Nathan's Hot Dogs by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion with an abstract of This paper delves into an out-of-this-world phenomenon, investigating the peculiar relationship between the frequency of UFO sightings in the state of Kentucky and the amount of hotdogs consumed by the reigning champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. In our quest for cosmic connections, we analyzed data from the National UFO Reporting Center and Wikipedia to shed light on this enigmatic correlation. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8832279 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1979 to 2021, prompting further investigation into this unexpected linkage.
As we sifted through countless reports of UFO sightings and hotdog consumption statistics, we couldn't help but wonder if there was a "supernatural sausage yield" at play. (Cue the groans and eye rolls.) The data presented itself as a cosmic jigsaw puzzle, with each UFO sighting fitting eerily well with spikes in hotdog consumption by the esteemed Nathan's champion. It's safe to say that we were grappling with issues of universal magnitude here.
Our research opens up a veritable Pandora's bun, raising questions about the potential influence of extraterrestrial visitors on competitive eating events. The implications of this otherworldly hotdog hypothesis are far-reaching, challenging traditional notions of cause and effect. Our findings beckon us to consider the cosmic factors at play in the seemingly terrestrial realm of competitive eating, leaving us to ponder whether there might be some "space-age relish" involved in the phenomenon. Rest assured, we'll continue our pursuit of understanding this celestial frankfurter connection, armed with a touch of humor and a side of skepticism. After all, it's a hotdog-eat-UFO world out there.

ChatGPT:

UFO sightings, Kentucky, hotdog consumption, Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, correlation, cosmic connections, National UFO Reporting Center, data analysis, supernatural sausage yield, competitive eating, extraterrestrial influence, space-age relish

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

UFO sightings in Kentucky
Detailed data title: UFO sightings reported in Kentucky
Source: National UFO Reporting Center
See what else correlates with UFO sightings in Kentucky

Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Detailed data title: Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

Correlation r = 0.8832279 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7800914 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 78% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., UFO sightings in Kentucky) over the 43 years from 1979 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.6E-15. 0.0000000000000045707469947809
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 4.6E-13% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 218,782,619,370,936 random variables You don't actually need 218 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 42 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 42 because we have two variables measured over a period of 43 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1979198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
UFO sightings in Kentucky (UFO sightings)445406111353264799614143225352637415745556658497861908667536545727919
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion (Hotdogs eaten)99.5111110.59.511.7515.513.51015.51621.519172019.522.2524.51920.25255050.544.553.334953.75665968546268696162707274717576




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4,4,5,4,0,6,1,11,3,5,3,2,6,4,7,9,9,6,14,14,32,25,35,26,37,41,57,45,55,66,58,49,78,61,90,86,67,53,65,45,72,79,19,])
array_2 = np.array([9,9.5,11,11,10.5,9.5,11.75,15.5,13.5,10,15.5,16,21.5,19,17,20,19.5,22.25,24.5,19,20.25,25,50,50.5,44.5,53.33,49,53.75,66,59,68,54,62,68,69,61,62,70,72,74,71,75,76,])
array_1_name = "UFO sightings in Kentucky"
array_2_name = "Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 1625 · Black Variable ID: 1174 · Red Variable ID: 500
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0