about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,617 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Tatyana and the second variable is Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama.  The chart goes from 1982 to 2007, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

With more Tatyana's in the area, there were more carpooling groups formed, leading to increased traffic congestion and higher levels of vehicle emissions, ultimately contributing to air pollution in Decatur, Alabama.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a lively park scene in Decatur, Alabama, where children energetically play amidst the thick haze. The setting sun casts a pale orange glow, adding to the somber atmosphere due to poor air quality. Several girls, referred to as Tatyana by their friends, are prominently engaged in the playful activities. Capture the sense of haziness and the subtle shroud over the park caused by the environmental conditions. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Tatyana and Poor air quality in Decatur, Alabama. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Realistic Cute cartoon Scalar art
ChatGPT: Poor air quality in Decatur, Alabama

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Tatyana and Poor air quality in Decatur, Alabama together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Decatur, Alabama, a park is bustling with children playing, and many of the girls are called Tatyana by their friends. The air is thick with haze, and the setting sun is shrouded in a pale orange hue due to poor air quality.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Poor air quality in Decatur, Alabama ] and depicting this scene: In Decatur, Alabama, a park is bustling with children playing, and many of the girls are called Tatyana by their friends. The air is thick with haze, and the setting sun is shrouded in a pale orange hue due to poor air quality. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a lively park scene in Decatur, Alabama, where children energetically play amidst the thick haze. The setting sun casts a pale orange glow, adding to the somber atmosphere due to poor air quality. Several girls, referred to as Tatyana by their friends, are prominently engaged in the playful activities. Capture the sense of haziness and the subtle shroud over the park caused by the environmental conditions.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Tatyana caused Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Breath of Fresh Alabama Air: The Surprising Relationship Between Tatyana's Popularity and Pollution in Decatur

Journal of Environmental Peculiarities

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Tatyana and Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7134902 and p < 0.01 for 1982 to 2007.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Alabama Air: The Surprising Relationship Between Tatyana's Popularity and Pollution in Decatur

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected connection between the popularity of the first name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama. Examining data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we discovered a puzzling correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Utilizing correlation coefficient analysis, we calculated a statistically significant coefficient of 0.7134902 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1982 to 2007. These findings provoke both intrigue and amusement, challenging conventional wisdom and prompting further investigation into the whimsical interplay of naming trends and environmental factors. Our research sheds light on the lighthearted and enigmatic nature of human behavior and its potential influence on localized atmospheric conditions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Tatyana and Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Alabama Air: The Surprising Relationship Between Tatyana's Popularity and Pollution in Decatur

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected connection between the popularity of the first name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama. Examining data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we discovered a puzzling correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Utilizing correlation coefficient analysis, we calculated a statistically significant coefficient of 0.7134902 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1982 to 2007. These findings provoke both intrigue and amusement, challenging conventional wisdom and prompting further investigation into the whimsical interplay of naming trends and environmental factors. Our research sheds light on the lighthearted and enigmatic nature of human behavior and its potential influence on localized atmospheric conditions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The discovery of unusual and unexpected connections in the field of research is always a cause for both amusement and intrigue. In this study, we set out to explore the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama. While these two variables may seem as dissimilar as chalk and cheese, our investigation uncovered a surprising correlation that warrants further examination.

As researchers, we are accustomed to unearthing meaningful correlations between variables, but the link between a name and air quality certainly raised a few eyebrows in the academic community. It seems that the whims of human nomenclature may exert a curious influence on the atmospheric conditions of a region. Admittedly, this revelation might prompt some skeptical raised eyebrows or even a few incredulous eye rolls, but rest assured, our findings are anchored in robust statistical analysis.

It is not every day that a researcher gets to explore the playful and unexpected connections between human behavior and environmental phenomena. This study serves as a reminder that there is always room for surprise and amusement in the often serious and stringent world of scientific inquiry. So, buckle up for an unusual journey as we delve into the quirky interplay of Tatyana's popularity and Decatur's air quality. Our findings promise a breath of fresh Alabama air in the realm of research and statistics, with a dash of whimsy and wonder added to the mix.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Tatyana and Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Alabama Air: The Surprising Relationship Between Tatyana's Popularity and Pollution in Decatur

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected connection between the popularity of the first name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama. Examining data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we discovered a puzzling correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Utilizing correlation coefficient analysis, we calculated a statistically significant coefficient of 0.7134902 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1982 to 2007. These findings provoke both intrigue and amusement, challenging conventional wisdom and prompting further investigation into the whimsical interplay of naming trends and environmental factors. Our research sheds light on the lighthearted and enigmatic nature of human behavior and its potential influence on localized atmospheric conditions.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The discovery of unusual and unexpected connections in the field of research is always a cause for both amusement and intrigue. In this study, we set out to explore the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama. While these two variables may seem as dissimilar as chalk and cheese, our investigation uncovered a surprising correlation that warrants further examination.
As researchers, we are accustomed to unearthing meaningful correlations between variables, but the link between a name and air quality certainly raised a few eyebrows in the academic community. It seems that the whims of human nomenclature may exert a curious influence on the atmospheric conditions of a region. Admittedly, this revelation might prompt some skeptical raised eyebrows or even a few incredulous eye rolls, but rest assured, our findings are anchored in robust statistical analysis.
It is not every day that a researcher gets to explore the playful and unexpected connections between human behavior and environmental phenomena. This study serves as a reminder that there is always room for surprise and amusement in the often serious and stringent world of scientific inquiry. So, buckle up for an unusual journey as we delve into the quirky interplay of Tatyana's popularity and Decatur's air quality. Our findings promise a breath of fresh Alabama air in the realm of research and statistics, with a dash of whimsy and wonder added to the mix.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Several serious studies have been conducted to investigate the potential influence of human naming trends on environmental phenomena. Smith et al. (2010) examined the correlation between regional naming patterns and air pollution levels, finding intriguing connections in multiple municipalities. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) explored the impact of name popularity on local atmospheric conditions, offering insightful analyses of naming trends in relation to environmental factors.

Drawing from non-fiction literature, "The Geography of Names" by Salazar (2017) provides a comprehensive examination of the cultural, historical, and geographical aspects of personal naming practices. Additionally, "Air Quality in Industrial Cities" by Rodriguez (2013) offers detailed insights into the complex dynamics of atmospheric pollution in urban areas.

In the realm of fiction, the works of authors such as Aira and Pynchon present imaginative narratives that tangentially allude to the interplay between human behavior and environmental peculiarities. These fictional accounts, while not directly addressing the correlation under investigation, offer a whimsical lens through which to contemplate the enigmatic relationship between Tatyana's popularity and air quality in Decatur.

Moreover, movies such as "The Airbender's Name" and "Tatyana and the Pollution Factory" provide light-hearted, albeit tangential, perspectives on the potential interactions between human nomenclature and atmospheric conditions. These cinematic depictions offer creative and entertaining interpretations of the curious correlation, adding an element of amusement to the ongoing academic discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Tatyana and Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1982 to 2007

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Alabama Air: The Surprising Relationship Between Tatyana's Popularity and Pollution in Decatur

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected connection between the popularity of the first name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama. Examining data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we discovered a puzzling correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Utilizing correlation coefficient analysis, we calculated a statistically significant coefficient of 0.7134902 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1982 to 2007. These findings provoke both intrigue and amusement, challenging conventional wisdom and prompting further investigation into the whimsical interplay of naming trends and environmental factors. Our research sheds light on the lighthearted and enigmatic nature of human behavior and its potential influence on localized atmospheric conditions.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The discovery of unusual and unexpected connections in the field of research is always a cause for both amusement and intrigue. In this study, we set out to explore the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama. While these two variables may seem as dissimilar as chalk and cheese, our investigation uncovered a surprising correlation that warrants further examination.
As researchers, we are accustomed to unearthing meaningful correlations between variables, but the link between a name and air quality certainly raised a few eyebrows in the academic community. It seems that the whims of human nomenclature may exert a curious influence on the atmospheric conditions of a region. Admittedly, this revelation might prompt some skeptical raised eyebrows or even a few incredulous eye rolls, but rest assured, our findings are anchored in robust statistical analysis.
It is not every day that a researcher gets to explore the playful and unexpected connections between human behavior and environmental phenomena. This study serves as a reminder that there is always room for surprise and amusement in the often serious and stringent world of scientific inquiry. So, buckle up for an unusual journey as we delve into the quirky interplay of Tatyana's popularity and Decatur's air quality. Our findings promise a breath of fresh Alabama air in the realm of research and statistics, with a dash of whimsy and wonder added to the mix.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The quest to unravel the mysterious relationship between the popularity of the name Tatyana and air pollution in Decatur, Alabama began with meticulous data collection. The team scoured the archives of the US Social Security Administration to extract the frequencies of the name Tatyana from 1982 to 2007. The collected data was then subjected to rigorous scrutiny, ensuring that we did not mistakenly include Tatyanas with an erroneous spelling (such as Tatyanka, Tatiyana, or Tatyiana) in our analysis. After all, we wouldn't want to accidentally inflate the influence of Tatyanas on the atmospheric conditions of Decatur.

As for the air pollution data, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) served as our oracle of environmental insights. We harvested air quality measurements, including levels of pollutants such as particulate matter, ozone, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide, from the vicinity of Decatur. This selection of pollutants was made with the intention of encapsulating the diverse tapestry of atmospheric contaminants that could potentially be swayed by the ebb and flow of Tatyana's popularity.

Statistical Analysis:
To untangle the convoluted web of Tatyana's sway over the air, our research demanded the execution of robust statistical methodologies. The partnership between the frequencies of the name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur was quantified through the calculation of correlation coefficients over the examined period. Our team employed both Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients to account for any potential nonlinear trends and to ensure a comprehensive grasp of their relationship.

The statistical analysis also included the construction of scatterplots, overlaying the undulating waves of Tatyana's prominence against the undulating peaks and troughs of air pollution levels. This visual feast of data points not only offered a delightful spectacle for the eyes but also facilitated a deeper grasp of the potential connections, as science is always more amusing with a dash of visual flair.

Furthermore, in order to substantiate any observed associations and reject the meddling ploys of mere randomness, hypothesis testing was conducted. The p-values derived from our tests provocatively whispered tales of statistical significance, prompting a raised eyebrow or two within the confines of our research sanctum.

After the careful wielding of statistical tools and an assortment of data examination techniques, we drew forth the bewildering but stalwart correlation coefficient of 0.7134902, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01. These vaunted numbers, clothed in the sober garb of statistical significance, laid the groundwork for the befuddling yet engaging tale of Tatyana's potential influence on the air quality of Decatur, Alabama.

In summary, our methodology galvanized an assortment of data sources and statistical techniques to excavate the enigmatic connection between Tatyana and atmospheric allure in Decatur, Alabama. This journey through the whimsical junction of human nomenclature and environmental phenomena has bestowed upon us a confluence of both amusement and scholarly edification.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Tatyana and Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 1982 to 2007, you found a correlation 0.7134902, r-squared of 0.5090683, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Alabama Air: The Surprising Relationship Between Tatyana's Popularity and Pollution in Decatur

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected connection between the popularity of the first name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama. Examining data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we discovered a puzzling correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Utilizing correlation coefficient analysis, we calculated a statistically significant coefficient of 0.7134902 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1982 to 2007. These findings provoke both intrigue and amusement, challenging conventional wisdom and prompting further investigation into the whimsical interplay of naming trends and environmental factors. Our research sheds light on the lighthearted and enigmatic nature of human behavior and its potential influence on localized atmospheric conditions.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The discovery of unusual and unexpected connections in the field of research is always a cause for both amusement and intrigue. In this study, we set out to explore the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama. While these two variables may seem as dissimilar as chalk and cheese, our investigation uncovered a surprising correlation that warrants further examination.
As researchers, we are accustomed to unearthing meaningful correlations between variables, but the link between a name and air quality certainly raised a few eyebrows in the academic community. It seems that the whims of human nomenclature may exert a curious influence on the atmospheric conditions of a region. Admittedly, this revelation might prompt some skeptical raised eyebrows or even a few incredulous eye rolls, but rest assured, our findings are anchored in robust statistical analysis.
It is not every day that a researcher gets to explore the playful and unexpected connections between human behavior and environmental phenomena. This study serves as a reminder that there is always room for surprise and amusement in the often serious and stringent world of scientific inquiry. So, buckle up for an unusual journey as we delve into the quirky interplay of Tatyana's popularity and Decatur's air quality. Our findings promise a breath of fresh Alabama air in the realm of research and statistics, with a dash of whimsy and wonder added to the mix.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis conducted revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama for the time period 1982 to 2007. The correlation coefficient of 0.7134902 implies a strong positive relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. Remarkably, the r-squared value of 0.5090683 indicates that over 50% of the variance in air pollution can be explained by the popularity of the name Tatyana.

The p-value of less than 0.01 suggests a statistically significant association, adding a touch of credibility to this unexpected connection. Indeed, one cannot help but marvel at the unanticipated relationship between a moniker and atmospheric conditions. It simply goes to show that in the world of research, one must always be prepared for the whimsical and the unforeseen.

Figure 1 displays a scatterplot visually depicting the robust correlation between the popularity of the name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama. This visual representation serves as a captivating testament to the undeniable link that prompted our scientific astonishment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Tatyana and Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Alabama Air: The Surprising Relationship Between Tatyana's Popularity and Pollution in Decatur

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected connection between the popularity of the first name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama. Examining data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we discovered a puzzling correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Utilizing correlation coefficient analysis, we calculated a statistically significant coefficient of 0.7134902 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1982 to 2007. These findings provoke both intrigue and amusement, challenging conventional wisdom and prompting further investigation into the whimsical interplay of naming trends and environmental factors. Our research sheds light on the lighthearted and enigmatic nature of human behavior and its potential influence on localized atmospheric conditions.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several serious studies have been conducted to investigate the potential influence of human naming trends on environmental phenomena. Smith et al. (2010) examined the correlation between regional naming patterns and air pollution levels, finding intriguing connections in multiple municipalities. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) explored the impact of name popularity on local atmospheric conditions, offering insightful analyses of naming trends in relation to environmental factors.
Drawing from non-fiction literature, "The Geography of Names" by Salazar (2017) provides a comprehensive examination of the cultural, historical, and geographical aspects of personal naming practices. Additionally, "Air Quality in Industrial Cities" by Rodriguez (2013) offers detailed insights into the complex dynamics of atmospheric pollution in urban areas.
In the realm of fiction, the works of authors such as Aira and Pynchon present imaginative narratives that tangentially allude to the interplay between human behavior and environmental peculiarities. These fictional accounts, while not directly addressing the correlation under investigation, offer a whimsical lens through which to contemplate the enigmatic relationship between Tatyana's popularity and air quality in Decatur.
Moreover, movies such as "The Airbender's Name" and "Tatyana and the Pollution Factory" provide light-hearted, albeit tangential, perspectives on the potential interactions between human nomenclature and atmospheric conditions. These cinematic depictions offer creative and entertaining interpretations of the curious correlation, adding an element of amusement to the ongoing academic discourse.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama for the time period 1982 to 2007. The correlation coefficient of 0.7134902 implies a strong positive relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. Remarkably, the r-squared value of 0.5090683 indicates that over 50% of the variance in air pollution can be explained by the popularity of the name Tatyana.
The p-value of less than 0.01 suggests a statistically significant association, adding a touch of credibility to this unexpected connection. Indeed, one cannot help but marvel at the unanticipated relationship between a moniker and atmospheric conditions. It simply goes to show that in the world of research, one must always be prepared for the whimsical and the unforeseen.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot visually depicting the robust correlation between the popularity of the name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama. This visual representation serves as a captivating testament to the undeniable link that prompted our scientific astonishment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study not only provide compelling evidence of a significant correlation between the popularity of the first name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama, but they also contribute to the growing body of research on the unforeseen influences on environmental conditions. The strong positive relationship revealed in our analysis aligns with the prior research conducted by Smith et al. (2010) and Doe and Jones (2015), supporting the notion that human naming trends may indeed have a tangible impact on localized atmospheric dynamics.

Surprisingly, the strength of the correlation, as indicated by the r-squared value of 0.5090683, underscores the substantial influence of Tatyana's popularity on air pollution levels. This unexpected sway of human nomenclature over atmospheric conditions reinforces the thought-provoking ideas presented in "The Geography of Names" by Salazar (2017), adding a layer of complexity to the lighthearted topic of naming practices and their potential ramifications on the environment.

The statistically significant p-value further solidifies the credibility of this whimsical association, echoing the findings of prior studies and substantiating the curious interplay between human behavior and environmental peculiarities. It is imperative to consider that while our results indeed support the prior research, the unexpected nature of this correlation serves as a poignant reminder that even in the realm of empirical inquiry, one should always anticipate the unanticipated and keep an open mind to the whimsical twists of scientific exploration.

In conclusion, the intriguing relationship between the popularity of the name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama adds a touch of humor and whimsy to the serious field of scientific inquiry. This correlation challenges conventional wisdom and beckons further investigation into the quirky interactions between human behavior and environmental factors, reaffirming the notion that research is as surprising as it is enlightening.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Tatyana and Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Breath of Fresh Alabama Air: The Surprising Relationship Between Tatyana's Popularity and Pollution in Decatur

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected connection between the popularity of the first name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama. Examining data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we discovered a puzzling correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Utilizing correlation coefficient analysis, we calculated a statistically significant coefficient of 0.7134902 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1982 to 2007. These findings provoke both intrigue and amusement, challenging conventional wisdom and prompting further investigation into the whimsical interplay of naming trends and environmental factors. Our research sheds light on the lighthearted and enigmatic nature of human behavior and its potential influence on localized atmospheric conditions.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The discovery of unusual and unexpected connections in the field of research is always a cause for both amusement and intrigue. In this study, we set out to explore the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama. While these two variables may seem as dissimilar as chalk and cheese, our investigation uncovered a surprising correlation that warrants further examination.
As researchers, we are accustomed to unearthing meaningful correlations between variables, but the link between a name and air quality certainly raised a few eyebrows in the academic community. It seems that the whims of human nomenclature may exert a curious influence on the atmospheric conditions of a region. Admittedly, this revelation might prompt some skeptical raised eyebrows or even a few incredulous eye rolls, but rest assured, our findings are anchored in robust statistical analysis.
It is not every day that a researcher gets to explore the playful and unexpected connections between human behavior and environmental phenomena. This study serves as a reminder that there is always room for surprise and amusement in the often serious and stringent world of scientific inquiry. So, buckle up for an unusual journey as we delve into the quirky interplay of Tatyana's popularity and Decatur's air quality. Our findings promise a breath of fresh Alabama air in the realm of research and statistics, with a dash of whimsy and wonder added to the mix.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted revealed a striking correlation between the popularity of the first name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama for the time period 1982 to 2007. The correlation coefficient of 0.7134902 implies a strong positive relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables. Remarkably, the r-squared value of 0.5090683 indicates that over 50% of the variance in air pollution can be explained by the popularity of the name Tatyana.
The p-value of less than 0.01 suggests a statistically significant association, adding a touch of credibility to this unexpected connection. Indeed, one cannot help but marvel at the unanticipated relationship between a moniker and atmospheric conditions. It simply goes to show that in the world of research, one must always be prepared for the whimsical and the unforeseen.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot visually depicting the robust correlation between the popularity of the name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama. This visual representation serves as a captivating testament to the undeniable link that prompted our scientific astonishment.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unraveled a captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama. The robust statistical analysis has indeed lent credence to this seemingly whimsical connection, reinforcing the notion that the world of research is full of surprises and the occasional statistical curveball.

As we reflect on these unexpected findings, one cannot help but marvel at the enigmatic interplay of human nomenclature with localized atmospheric conditions. It appears that Tatyana's popularity has not only been a frequent occurrence in Decatur but may have exerted a substantial influence on the region's air quality. Such an observation certainly adds a touch of levity to our usually serious and rigorous field of scientific inquiry.

Our research offers a breath of fresh Alabama air, infusing the often staid world of statistics with an element of humor and intrigue. While our findings may prompt a few lighthearted chuckles and bemused head scratches, it is essential to acknowledge the significance of unearthing unexpected connections in the realm of scientific investigation.

In light of these compelling results, it seems that further research in this area may yield diminishing returns, akin to trying to find a needle in a statistical haystack. Therefore, we assert that no more exploration is warranted, as our findings have already provided a delightful and thought-provoking contribution to the scientific community.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Breath of Fresh Alabama Air: The Surprising Relationship Between Tatyana's Popularity and Pollution in Decatur. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Environmental Peculiarities


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Breath of Fresh Alabama Air: The Surprising Relationship Between Tatyana's Popularity and Pollution in Decatur. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for the Advancement of Southern Environmental Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Breath of Fresh Alabama Air: The Surprising Relationship Between Tatyana's Popularity and Pollution in Decatur with an abstract of This study delves into the unexpected connection between the popularity of the first name Tatyana and air pollution levels in Decatur, Alabama. Examining data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we discovered a puzzling correlation between the two seemingly unrelated phenomena. Utilizing correlation coefficient analysis, we calculated a statistically significant coefficient of 0.7134902 with a p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 1982 to 2007. These findings provoke both intrigue and amusement, challenging conventional wisdom and prompting further investigation into the whimsical interplay of naming trends and environmental factors. Our research sheds light on the lighthearted and enigmatic nature of human behavior and its potential influence on localized atmospheric conditions.

ChatGPT:

"Tatyana popularity," "pollution in Decatur Alabama," "relationship between naming trends and environmental factors," "correlation coefficient analysis," "US Social Security Administration data," "Environmental Protection Agency data," "air pollution levels in Decatur Alabama," "whimsical interplay of naming trends and environmental factors," "localized atmospheric conditions," "human behavior and atmospheric conditions."

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Tatyana
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Tatyana
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Tatyana

Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Decatur, AL
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama

Correlation r = 0.7134902 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5090683 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 50.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Tatyana) over the 26 years from 1982 through 2007.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.3E-5. 0.0000427816076343939100000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.71 in 0.0043% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 23,375 random variables You don't actually need 23 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 25 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 25 because we have two variables measured over a period of 26 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.45, 0.86 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007
Popularity of the first name Tatyana (Babies born)1110162637642327431222292683047037745859781161721500420406377354334292
Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama (Bad air quality days)1.0489500000000001.219510.2840910.2958582.4137901.162793.071672.464790.3508771.408450.3521130000.704225




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([11,10,16,26,37,64,23,27,43,122,229,268,304,703,774,585,978,1161,721,500,420,406,377,354,334,292,])
array_2 = np.array([1.04895,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1.21951,0.284091,0.295858,2.41379,0,1.16279,3.07167,2.46479,0.350877,1.40845,0.352113,0,0,0,0.704225,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Tatyana"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Decatur, Alabama"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 1617 · Black Variable ID: 2660 · Red Variable ID: 20529
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0