about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,604 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Butter consumption and the second variable is Ticket prices at North American movie theaters.  The chart goes from 2001 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As people started slathering on more buttery toppings at the movie theater, there was a sudden surge in demand for extra napkins. This napkin shortage led to an increase in production costs for napkin manufacturers. To offset these rising expenses, the movie theaters had to raise ticket prices in order to cover the cost of the now luxurious, butter-absorbing, premium napkins. Remember, it's not just about the buttery popcorn anymore - it's about the whole buttery experience!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image with the style of a Discovery magazine cover depicting a moviegoer happily spreading a generous amount of butter over a large bucket of popcorn, while glancing at the high-priced movie tickets in their other hand. The scene should be depicted with great attention to the details of the popcorn and the movie tickets, creating a visually appealing composition that captures the joy of indulging in a movie theater treat and the anticipation of a cinematic experience. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Butter consumption and Ticket prices at North American movie theaters. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Data cyber art A Discovery magazine cover image Cutsy art illustration a Polaroid photo Cute 2D animation
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Butter consumption and Ticket prices at North American movie theaters together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A moviegoer happily spreads a generous amount of butter over a large bucket of popcorn, while glancing at the high-priced movie tickets in their other hand.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: A moviegoer happily spreads a generous amount of butter over a large bucket of popcorn, while glancing at the high-priced movie tickets in their other hand. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image with the style of a Discovery magazine cover depicting a moviegoer happily spreading a generous amount of butter over a large bucket of popcorn, while glancing at the high-priced movie tickets in their other hand. The scene should be depicted with great attention to the details of the popcorn and the movie tickets, creating a visually appealing composition that captures the joy of indulging in a movie theater treat and the anticipation of a cinematic experience.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Butter consumption caused Ticket prices at North American movie theaters to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Popcorn or Pop-Myth: A Butter Truth Serum or a Margarine of Error? Examining the Correlation Between Butter Consumption and Ticket Prices at North American Movie Theaters

The Journal of Cinematic Gastronomy

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Ticket prices at North American movie theaters. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and The Numbers to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9763985 and p < 0.01 for 2001 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Popcorn or Pop-Myth: A Butter Truth Serum or a Margarine of Error? Examining the Correlation Between Butter Consumption and Ticket Prices at North American Movie Theaters"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we scrutinize the plausibility of a link between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters. Despite initial skepticism surrounding this topic, our research team dove headfirst into the data, determined to butter up the truth. Utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and The Numbers, we aimed to spread light on this opaque field and churn out some enlightening findings.

Our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9763985 and with a significance level p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship between butter consumption and ticket prices. These results butter be taken seriously, as they challenge conventional wisdom and may prompt a re-evaluation of the factors influencing movie theater economics.

Our findings provoke contemplation on the potential causality behind this buttery association and open the door to numerous avenues for future research. We butter-certainly hope that this study encourages others to delve into unexpected connections and flavors their scholarly pursuits with a pinch of humor.

On a lighter note, did you hear about the popcorn that started telling jokes? It popped out some real buttery punchlines!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Ticket prices at North American movie theaters. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Popcorn or Pop-Myth: A Butter Truth Serum or a Margarine of Error? Examining the Correlation Between Butter Consumption and Ticket Prices at North American Movie Theaters"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we scrutinize the plausibility of a link between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters. Despite initial skepticism surrounding this topic, our research team dove headfirst into the data, determined to butter up the truth. Utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and The Numbers, we aimed to spread light on this opaque field and churn out some enlightening findings.

Our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9763985 and with a significance level p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship between butter consumption and ticket prices. These results butter be taken seriously, as they challenge conventional wisdom and may prompt a re-evaluation of the factors influencing movie theater economics.

Our findings provoke contemplation on the potential causality behind this buttery association and open the door to numerous avenues for future research. We butter-certainly hope that this study encourages others to delve into unexpected connections and flavors their scholarly pursuits with a pinch of humor.

On a lighter note, did you hear about the popcorn that started telling jokes? It popped out some real buttery punchlines!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of consumer behavior and economic trends has long been a subject of fascination for researchers in various disciplines. In the kaleidoscope of unconventional correlations, one particular topic has managed to butter up the curiosity of both academics and movie enthusiasts alike: the potential link between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we are reminded of the opening scene of a thought-provoking film – a wide shot that slowly zooms in to reveal unexpected plot twists.

While it may initially seem like a topic worthy of polite chuckles and raised eyebrows, the notion of butter consumption impacting movie ticket prices is not to be dismissed lightly. This peculiar connection has lingered in the popcorn-scented air of conjecture for far too long, and it's high time to lend it the scrutiny it deserves. After all, as the adage goes, "butter to be safe than sorry."

Our investigation stems from a determination to churn the rumors and kernels of truth surrounding this topic. The layers of complexity are as intricate as the folds of a meticulously crafted croissant, but we are undeterred in our mission to spread a pat of clarity on this obscure corner of consumer behavior and entertainment economics.

The present study confronts the question: is there truly a substantive relationship between the amount of butter slathered on movie theater popcorn and the steepness of ticket prices? As we delve deeper into this inquisitive matter, it becomes evident that the implications extend beyond a mere kernel of curiosity. Pardon the pun, but this correlation may just be the butter half of a larger cinematic picture.

Before we embark on our analytical odyssey, it behooves us to acknowledge the skepticism and quizzical expressions that this topic may elicit. Nevertheless, we remain undeterred in our pursuit of knowledge, much like a determined diner spreading butter on a stubbornly resistant slice of bread.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Ticket prices at North American movie theaters. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Popcorn or Pop-Myth: A Butter Truth Serum or a Margarine of Error? Examining the Correlation Between Butter Consumption and Ticket Prices at North American Movie Theaters"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we scrutinize the plausibility of a link between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters. Despite initial skepticism surrounding this topic, our research team dove headfirst into the data, determined to butter up the truth. Utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and The Numbers, we aimed to spread light on this opaque field and churn out some enlightening findings.

Our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9763985 and with a significance level p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship between butter consumption and ticket prices. These results butter be taken seriously, as they challenge conventional wisdom and may prompt a re-evaluation of the factors influencing movie theater economics.

Our findings provoke contemplation on the potential causality behind this buttery association and open the door to numerous avenues for future research. We butter-certainly hope that this study encourages others to delve into unexpected connections and flavors their scholarly pursuits with a pinch of humor.

On a lighter note, did you hear about the popcorn that started telling jokes? It popped out some real buttery punchlines!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of consumer behavior and economic trends has long been a subject of fascination for researchers in various disciplines. In the kaleidoscope of unconventional correlations, one particular topic has managed to butter up the curiosity of both academics and movie enthusiasts alike: the potential link between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we are reminded of the opening scene of a thought-provoking film – a wide shot that slowly zooms in to reveal unexpected plot twists.
While it may initially seem like a topic worthy of polite chuckles and raised eyebrows, the notion of butter consumption impacting movie ticket prices is not to be dismissed lightly. This peculiar connection has lingered in the popcorn-scented air of conjecture for far too long, and it's high time to lend it the scrutiny it deserves. After all, as the adage goes, "butter to be safe than sorry."
Our investigation stems from a determination to churn the rumors and kernels of truth surrounding this topic. The layers of complexity are as intricate as the folds of a meticulously crafted croissant, but we are undeterred in our mission to spread a pat of clarity on this obscure corner of consumer behavior and entertainment economics.
The present study confronts the question: is there truly a substantive relationship between the amount of butter slathered on movie theater popcorn and the steepness of ticket prices? As we delve deeper into this inquisitive matter, it becomes evident that the implications extend beyond a mere kernel of curiosity. Pardon the pun, but this correlation may just be the butter half of a larger cinematic picture.
Before we embark on our analytical odyssey, it behooves us to acknowledge the skepticism and quizzical expressions that this topic may elicit. Nevertheless, we remain undeterred in our pursuit of knowledge, much like a determined diner spreading butter on a stubbornly resistant slice of bread.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Several studies have examined the relationship between consumer behavior and economic trends, shedding light on unexpected correlations that prompt both scholarly intrigue and delightful amusement. Among these curious connections, the potential association between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters has recently drawn attention from researchers. In "Smith et al.'s analysis of Consumer Behavior and Food Industry Trends," the authors find a correlation between increased butter consumption and a rise in ticket prices, hinting at a potential underpinning of economic influence in the theater concessions market.

However, as our investigation branched out to explore this tantalizingly peculiar relationship, we stumbled upon a myriad of unexpected sources that delved into the buttery world of consumption and the economics of entertainment. "The Economics of Butter: A Global Perspective" by Doe and Jones takes a lighthearted yet thorough look at butter as a commodity, offering insights that inadvertently spill over into the world of movie theater indulgence.

As the trail of literature led us further down the buttery path, we encountered surprising connections in unexpected places. "The Margarine Murders: A Culinary Mystery" by Olive Spread investigates a butter-related crime, presenting an intriguing narrative backdrop to our scholarly pursuit. Similarly, "Popcorn Chronicles: Tales of Cinematic Snack Shenanigans" by Salty Savory takes a whimsical dive into the lore and legends of movie concessions, sparking the imagination and adding a sprinkle of amusement to our academic endeavors.

In our quest for a comprehensive understanding of the link between butter consumption and ticket prices, we explored diverse sources of information, including seemingly unrelated materials. Notably, our literature review uncovered unconventional insights from unexpected sources, such as anecdotal evidence from moviegoers and even comically lengthy CVS receipts that inadvertently disclosed patterns in butter consumption and its potential influence on movie theater economics.

In the spirit of scholarly exploration, our review emphasized the multidisciplinary nature of this inquiry, reflecting the eclectic palette of sources that contributed to our understanding of this unconventional correlation. Amidst the serious analysis, we could not resist a buttery dad joke or two, adding a dash of whimsy to our academic pursuit. After all, what's a research paper without a bit of flavor?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Ticket prices at North American movie theaters. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and The Numbers . You used data from 2001 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Popcorn or Pop-Myth: A Butter Truth Serum or a Margarine of Error? Examining the Correlation Between Butter Consumption and Ticket Prices at North American Movie Theaters"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we scrutinize the plausibility of a link between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters. Despite initial skepticism surrounding this topic, our research team dove headfirst into the data, determined to butter up the truth. Utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and The Numbers, we aimed to spread light on this opaque field and churn out some enlightening findings.

Our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9763985 and with a significance level p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship between butter consumption and ticket prices. These results butter be taken seriously, as they challenge conventional wisdom and may prompt a re-evaluation of the factors influencing movie theater economics.

Our findings provoke contemplation on the potential causality behind this buttery association and open the door to numerous avenues for future research. We butter-certainly hope that this study encourages others to delve into unexpected connections and flavors their scholarly pursuits with a pinch of humor.

On a lighter note, did you hear about the popcorn that started telling jokes? It popped out some real buttery punchlines!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of consumer behavior and economic trends has long been a subject of fascination for researchers in various disciplines. In the kaleidoscope of unconventional correlations, one particular topic has managed to butter up the curiosity of both academics and movie enthusiasts alike: the potential link between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we are reminded of the opening scene of a thought-provoking film – a wide shot that slowly zooms in to reveal unexpected plot twists.
While it may initially seem like a topic worthy of polite chuckles and raised eyebrows, the notion of butter consumption impacting movie ticket prices is not to be dismissed lightly. This peculiar connection has lingered in the popcorn-scented air of conjecture for far too long, and it's high time to lend it the scrutiny it deserves. After all, as the adage goes, "butter to be safe than sorry."
Our investigation stems from a determination to churn the rumors and kernels of truth surrounding this topic. The layers of complexity are as intricate as the folds of a meticulously crafted croissant, but we are undeterred in our mission to spread a pat of clarity on this obscure corner of consumer behavior and entertainment economics.
The present study confronts the question: is there truly a substantive relationship between the amount of butter slathered on movie theater popcorn and the steepness of ticket prices? As we delve deeper into this inquisitive matter, it becomes evident that the implications extend beyond a mere kernel of curiosity. Pardon the pun, but this correlation may just be the butter half of a larger cinematic picture.
Before we embark on our analytical odyssey, it behooves us to acknowledge the skepticism and quizzical expressions that this topic may elicit. Nevertheless, we remain undeterred in our pursuit of knowledge, much like a determined diner spreading butter on a stubbornly resistant slice of bread.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the potential relationship between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters, a multi-faceted approach was employed. The first step involved the comprehensive collection of data from reputable sources such as the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and The Numbers, covering the period from 2001 to 2021. The data sources were carefully selected to ensure the highest quality, much like the finest churned butter.

After diligently sifting through a myriad of kernels of information, the team acquired data on butter consumption patterns and average ticket prices across various regions of North America. The data extraction process was as meticulous as separating the cream from milk, ensuring that only the richest and most relevant data was incorporated into the analysis. We certainly didn't want to spread any half-baked findings!

To measure butter consumption, detailed records of butter sales, per capita consumption, and industry reports were amalgamated, giving us a "spreadable" overview of butter trends across the years under investigation. In parallel, average ticket prices from different movie theaters and chains were sourced and cross-verified to ensure the buttery consistency of the dataset.

Once the dataset was firmly in hand, statistical analysis techniques were applied to ascertain the strength and direction of the association between butter consumption and ticket prices. The mammoth task of wrangling the data into a format suitable for statistical analysis was akin to kneading dough – requiring patience, precision, and just a dash of humor to keep it light and fluffy.

The analysis involved the calculation of correlation coefficients to quantify the degree of association between butter consumption and ticket prices. This process was executed with the utmost care, much like the delicate balance of flavors in a perfectly seasoned dish. The statistical tests were conducted using robust software packages to ensure accuracy and reliability, akin to the precision of a master chef wielding their culinary tools.

In addition to the primary analysis, a series of sensitivity tests were performed to validate the robustness of the findings. These tests involved variations in data segmentation, control variables, and modeling techniques, ensuring that the results were not just a fluke – a buttery statistical accident, if you will. The objective was to churn out results that could withstand scrutiny, even in the face of skepticism, much like a resilient slab of farmhouse butter.

As with any research endeavor, limitations were acknowledged and meticulously addressed. Potential confounding variables, such as economic fluctuations and movie industry trends, were considered and controlled for in the analysis. The objective was to isolate the unique influence of butter consumption on ticket prices, much like sieving out impurities from clarified butter.

Taking a cue from the culinary world, the methodology was designed to marinate the research in careful deliberation, sprinkle it with analytical rigor, and bake it at the perfect temperature to yield findings that were just as satisfying as a perfectly buttered portion of theater popcorn. So, you see, this research wasn't just about sifting through data; it was about whisking together a compelling narrative derived from the enchanting flavors of statistical analysis.

Speaking of enchanting flavors, have you heard about the butter who couldn't stop telling jokes? It had a real knack for spreading laughter!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Ticket prices at North American movie theaters. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and The Numbers .

For the time period 2001 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9763985, r-squared of 0.9533540, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Popcorn or Pop-Myth: A Butter Truth Serum or a Margarine of Error? Examining the Correlation Between Butter Consumption and Ticket Prices at North American Movie Theaters"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we scrutinize the plausibility of a link between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters. Despite initial skepticism surrounding this topic, our research team dove headfirst into the data, determined to butter up the truth. Utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and The Numbers, we aimed to spread light on this opaque field and churn out some enlightening findings.

Our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9763985 and with a significance level p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship between butter consumption and ticket prices. These results butter be taken seriously, as they challenge conventional wisdom and may prompt a re-evaluation of the factors influencing movie theater economics.

Our findings provoke contemplation on the potential causality behind this buttery association and open the door to numerous avenues for future research. We butter-certainly hope that this study encourages others to delve into unexpected connections and flavors their scholarly pursuits with a pinch of humor.

On a lighter note, did you hear about the popcorn that started telling jokes? It popped out some real buttery punchlines!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of consumer behavior and economic trends has long been a subject of fascination for researchers in various disciplines. In the kaleidoscope of unconventional correlations, one particular topic has managed to butter up the curiosity of both academics and movie enthusiasts alike: the potential link between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we are reminded of the opening scene of a thought-provoking film – a wide shot that slowly zooms in to reveal unexpected plot twists.
While it may initially seem like a topic worthy of polite chuckles and raised eyebrows, the notion of butter consumption impacting movie ticket prices is not to be dismissed lightly. This peculiar connection has lingered in the popcorn-scented air of conjecture for far too long, and it's high time to lend it the scrutiny it deserves. After all, as the adage goes, "butter to be safe than sorry."
Our investigation stems from a determination to churn the rumors and kernels of truth surrounding this topic. The layers of complexity are as intricate as the folds of a meticulously crafted croissant, but we are undeterred in our mission to spread a pat of clarity on this obscure corner of consumer behavior and entertainment economics.
The present study confronts the question: is there truly a substantive relationship between the amount of butter slathered on movie theater popcorn and the steepness of ticket prices? As we delve deeper into this inquisitive matter, it becomes evident that the implications extend beyond a mere kernel of curiosity. Pardon the pun, but this correlation may just be the butter half of a larger cinematic picture.
Before we embark on our analytical odyssey, it behooves us to acknowledge the skepticism and quizzical expressions that this topic may elicit. Nevertheless, we remain undeterred in our pursuit of knowledge, much like a determined diner spreading butter on a stubbornly resistant slice of bread.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis conducted on the data collected from 2001 to 2021 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9763985 and an r-squared value of 0.9533540. This indicates that a substantial proportion of the variance in ticket prices can be explained by variations in butter consumption. It seems that the movie industry may have been churning out more than just blockbusters and buttered popcorn.

The resulting scatterplot, as depicted in Figure 1, provided a visual representation of this buttery association. The plot displays a clear positive trend, with increasing ticket prices aligning closely with higher levels of butter consumption. It seems that as the butter flows, so do the ticket prices – talk about a slippery slope.

These findings not only challenge conventional assumptions about the factors influencing movie theater economics but also prompt contemplation about the potential causal mechanisms underlying this surprising correlation. It appears that the seemingly innocent act of buttering up popcorn may have unforeseen implications for consumers' wallets – a real twist in the plot of movie concessions!

On a lighter note, while our research focused on the more serious correlation between butter consumption and ticket prices, we couldn't resist a good dad joke related to the topic. Buttery popcorn jokes aside, these findings represent a butter-laden affirmation that unconventional connections exist in the most unexpected places. This study encourages scholars to embrace the unexpected and perhaps even add a sprinkle of humor to their scholarly endeavors. After all, research doesn't always have to be as dry as unbuttered toast!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Ticket prices at North American movie theaters. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Popcorn or Pop-Myth: A Butter Truth Serum or a Margarine of Error? Examining the Correlation Between Butter Consumption and Ticket Prices at North American Movie Theaters"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we scrutinize the plausibility of a link between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters. Despite initial skepticism surrounding this topic, our research team dove headfirst into the data, determined to butter up the truth. Utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and The Numbers, we aimed to spread light on this opaque field and churn out some enlightening findings.

Our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9763985 and with a significance level p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship between butter consumption and ticket prices. These results butter be taken seriously, as they challenge conventional wisdom and may prompt a re-evaluation of the factors influencing movie theater economics.

Our findings provoke contemplation on the potential causality behind this buttery association and open the door to numerous avenues for future research. We butter-certainly hope that this study encourages others to delve into unexpected connections and flavors their scholarly pursuits with a pinch of humor.

On a lighter note, did you hear about the popcorn that started telling jokes? It popped out some real buttery punchlines!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several studies have examined the relationship between consumer behavior and economic trends, shedding light on unexpected correlations that prompt both scholarly intrigue and delightful amusement. Among these curious connections, the potential association between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters has recently drawn attention from researchers. In "Smith et al.'s analysis of Consumer Behavior and Food Industry Trends," the authors find a correlation between increased butter consumption and a rise in ticket prices, hinting at a potential underpinning of economic influence in the theater concessions market.
However, as our investigation branched out to explore this tantalizingly peculiar relationship, we stumbled upon a myriad of unexpected sources that delved into the buttery world of consumption and the economics of entertainment. "The Economics of Butter: A Global Perspective" by Doe and Jones takes a lighthearted yet thorough look at butter as a commodity, offering insights that inadvertently spill over into the world of movie theater indulgence.
As the trail of literature led us further down the buttery path, we encountered surprising connections in unexpected places. "The Margarine Murders: A Culinary Mystery" by Olive Spread investigates a butter-related crime, presenting an intriguing narrative backdrop to our scholarly pursuit. Similarly, "Popcorn Chronicles: Tales of Cinematic Snack Shenanigans" by Salty Savory takes a whimsical dive into the lore and legends of movie concessions, sparking the imagination and adding a sprinkle of amusement to our academic endeavors.
In our quest for a comprehensive understanding of the link between butter consumption and ticket prices, we explored diverse sources of information, including seemingly unrelated materials. Notably, our literature review uncovered unconventional insights from unexpected sources, such as anecdotal evidence from moviegoers and even comically lengthy CVS receipts that inadvertently disclosed patterns in butter consumption and its potential influence on movie theater economics.
In the spirit of scholarly exploration, our review emphasized the multidisciplinary nature of this inquiry, reflecting the eclectic palette of sources that contributed to our understanding of this unconventional correlation. Amidst the serious analysis, we could not resist a buttery dad joke or two, adding a dash of whimsy to our academic pursuit. After all, what's a research paper without a bit of flavor?

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted on the data collected from 2001 to 2021 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9763985 and an r-squared value of 0.9533540. This indicates that a substantial proportion of the variance in ticket prices can be explained by variations in butter consumption. It seems that the movie industry may have been churning out more than just blockbusters and buttered popcorn.
The resulting scatterplot, as depicted in Figure 1, provided a visual representation of this buttery association. The plot displays a clear positive trend, with increasing ticket prices aligning closely with higher levels of butter consumption. It seems that as the butter flows, so do the ticket prices – talk about a slippery slope.
These findings not only challenge conventional assumptions about the factors influencing movie theater economics but also prompt contemplation about the potential causal mechanisms underlying this surprising correlation. It appears that the seemingly innocent act of buttering up popcorn may have unforeseen implications for consumers' wallets – a real twist in the plot of movie concessions!
On a lighter note, while our research focused on the more serious correlation between butter consumption and ticket prices, we couldn't resist a good dad joke related to the topic. Buttery popcorn jokes aside, these findings represent a butter-laden affirmation that unconventional connections exist in the most unexpected places. This study encourages scholars to embrace the unexpected and perhaps even add a sprinkle of humor to their scholarly endeavors. After all, research doesn't always have to be as dry as unbuttered toast!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study aimed to investigate the surprising connection between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters. The results of our analysis presented a compelling case for a strong positive correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables. The findings not only supported and extended prior research, as observed in the study by Smith et al., but also highlighted the need to further explore the potentially unexplored influence of butter consumption on movie theater economics.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9763985 obtained in our study buttresses the notion that variations in butter consumption are closely associated with fluctuations in ticket prices. This pervasive relationship suggests that butter consumption may indeed play a pivotal role in shaping the economic landscape of movie concessions. The significance level of p < 0.01 further underscores the statistical strength of this buttery association, leaving little room for doubt about its influence on ticket pricing dynamics.

In line with the findings of Smith et al., our results lend credence to the plausibility of butter consumption as a determinant of movie theater economics, adding substance to the hypothesis that butter is more than just a condiment for popcorn. These corroborative findings underscore the importance of considering unconventional and unexpected factors when analyzing consumer behavior and economic trends – even if these factors seem as unrelated as butter and ticket prices. It seems that buttering up the crowd may have a more significant impact on movie economics than previously thought.

Furthermore, the visual representation of our findings in the scatterplot adds a layer of vivid insight, depicting the coherent trend of increasing ticket prices aligning closely with higher levels of butter consumption. In the grand scheme of things, the linkage between these variables appears as clear as the greasy sheen on a tub of butter. It is a true testament to the potential influence of consumer consumption habits on the pricing structures within the entertainment industry.

On a lighter note, the unexpected correlation we uncovered in this study serves as a reminder that research endeavors should embrace the unexpected and perhaps even incorporate a touch of humor. Much like butter seamlessly elevates the flavor of popcorn, a sprinkle of wit can enliven scholarly pursuits. After all, there's no harm in infusing academic discourse with a dash of levity – it could be the butter to our scholarly bread.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Ticket prices at North American movie theaters. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Popcorn or Pop-Myth: A Butter Truth Serum or a Margarine of Error? Examining the Correlation Between Butter Consumption and Ticket Prices at North American Movie Theaters"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we scrutinize the plausibility of a link between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters. Despite initial skepticism surrounding this topic, our research team dove headfirst into the data, determined to butter up the truth. Utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and The Numbers, we aimed to spread light on this opaque field and churn out some enlightening findings.

Our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9763985 and with a significance level p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship between butter consumption and ticket prices. These results butter be taken seriously, as they challenge conventional wisdom and may prompt a re-evaluation of the factors influencing movie theater economics.

Our findings provoke contemplation on the potential causality behind this buttery association and open the door to numerous avenues for future research. We butter-certainly hope that this study encourages others to delve into unexpected connections and flavors their scholarly pursuits with a pinch of humor.

On a lighter note, did you hear about the popcorn that started telling jokes? It popped out some real buttery punchlines!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of consumer behavior and economic trends has long been a subject of fascination for researchers in various disciplines. In the kaleidoscope of unconventional correlations, one particular topic has managed to butter up the curiosity of both academics and movie enthusiasts alike: the potential link between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we are reminded of the opening scene of a thought-provoking film – a wide shot that slowly zooms in to reveal unexpected plot twists.
While it may initially seem like a topic worthy of polite chuckles and raised eyebrows, the notion of butter consumption impacting movie ticket prices is not to be dismissed lightly. This peculiar connection has lingered in the popcorn-scented air of conjecture for far too long, and it's high time to lend it the scrutiny it deserves. After all, as the adage goes, "butter to be safe than sorry."
Our investigation stems from a determination to churn the rumors and kernels of truth surrounding this topic. The layers of complexity are as intricate as the folds of a meticulously crafted croissant, but we are undeterred in our mission to spread a pat of clarity on this obscure corner of consumer behavior and entertainment economics.
The present study confronts the question: is there truly a substantive relationship between the amount of butter slathered on movie theater popcorn and the steepness of ticket prices? As we delve deeper into this inquisitive matter, it becomes evident that the implications extend beyond a mere kernel of curiosity. Pardon the pun, but this correlation may just be the butter half of a larger cinematic picture.
Before we embark on our analytical odyssey, it behooves us to acknowledge the skepticism and quizzical expressions that this topic may elicit. Nevertheless, we remain undeterred in our pursuit of knowledge, much like a determined diner spreading butter on a stubbornly resistant slice of bread.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted on the data collected from 2001 to 2021 revealed a remarkably strong correlation between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9763985 and an r-squared value of 0.9533540. This indicates that a substantial proportion of the variance in ticket prices can be explained by variations in butter consumption. It seems that the movie industry may have been churning out more than just blockbusters and buttered popcorn.
The resulting scatterplot, as depicted in Figure 1, provided a visual representation of this buttery association. The plot displays a clear positive trend, with increasing ticket prices aligning closely with higher levels of butter consumption. It seems that as the butter flows, so do the ticket prices – talk about a slippery slope.
These findings not only challenge conventional assumptions about the factors influencing movie theater economics but also prompt contemplation about the potential causal mechanisms underlying this surprising correlation. It appears that the seemingly innocent act of buttering up popcorn may have unforeseen implications for consumers' wallets – a real twist in the plot of movie concessions!
On a lighter note, while our research focused on the more serious correlation between butter consumption and ticket prices, we couldn't resist a good dad joke related to the topic. Buttery popcorn jokes aside, these findings represent a butter-laden affirmation that unconventional connections exist in the most unexpected places. This study encourages scholars to embrace the unexpected and perhaps even add a sprinkle of humor to their scholarly endeavors. After all, research doesn't always have to be as dry as unbuttered toast!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has shed light on the buttery relationship between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters. The remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9763985 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021 definitively accentuates the strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding is nothing short of a blockbuster revelation, resembling a plot twist you never saw coming – butter believe it!

The visual representation of this correlation in the form of a scatterplot further emphasizes the undeniable link between butter consumption and ticket prices, leaving little room for skepticism or buttered skepticism, if you will. It seems that the butter content of our snacks may have a profound impact on the butter content of our wallets – talk about a churn for the better!

On a lighter note, while our research focused on the more serious correlation between butter consumption and ticket prices, we couldn't resist a good dad joke related to the topic. Did you hear about the movie theater that started buttering its tickets? It wanted to butter up its audience before the show, creating a truly butter-taining experience!

These findings herald a new era in the study of consumer behavior and entertainment economics. The implications of our results ripple through the movie industry, prompting a re-evaluation of the factors influencing movie theater economics and buttering up the dialogue on unexpected correlations. It seems that behind every popcorn kernel lies a kernel of truth – or should we say, a "buttery truth"?

In light of these compelling findings, we are confident in asserting that no more research is needed in this area. The butter has been spread, and the kernels have popped! It's time to let this study marinate in the annals of scholarly inquiry, leaving its readers with a chuckle and a newfound appreciation for the unexpected flavors of research. After all, why research when we have already found the butter half of the story?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Popcorn or Pop-Myth: A Butter Truth Serum or a Margarine of Error? Examining the Correlation Between Butter Consumption and Ticket Prices at North American Movie Theaters. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Cinematic Gastronomy


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Popcorn or Pop-Myth: A Butter Truth Serum or a Margarine of Error? Examining the Correlation Between Butter Consumption and Ticket Prices at North American Movie Theaters. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Cinematic Consumption Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Popcorn or Pop-Myth: A Butter Truth Serum or a Margarine of Error? Examining the Correlation Between Butter Consumption and Ticket Prices at North American Movie Theaters with an abstract of In this study, we scrutinize the plausibility of a link between butter consumption and ticket prices at North American movie theaters. Despite initial skepticism surrounding this topic, our research team dove headfirst into the data, determined to butter up the truth. Utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and The Numbers, we aimed to spread light on this opaque field and churn out some enlightening findings.
Our analysis revealed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9763985 and with a significance level p < 0.01 for the years 2001 to 2021, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship between butter consumption and ticket prices. These results butter be taken seriously, as they challenge conventional wisdom and may prompt a re-evaluation of the factors influencing movie theater economics.
Our findings provoke contemplation on the potential causality behind this buttery association and open the door to numerous avenues for future research. We butter-certainly hope that this study encourages others to delve into unexpected connections and flavors their scholarly pursuits with a pinch of humor.
On a lighter note, did you hear about the popcorn that started telling jokes? It popped out some real buttery punchlines!

ChatGPT:

butter consumption, ticket prices, movie theaters, North America, correlation coefficient, USDA, The Numbers, movie theater economics, causality, future research, humor, popcorn, jokes

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Butter consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Butter in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Butter consumption

Ticket prices at North American movie theaters
Detailed data title: Average ticket price at North American movie theaters
Source: The Numbers
See what else correlates with Ticket prices at North American movie theaters

Correlation r = 0.9763985 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9533540 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Ticket prices at North American movie theaters) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Butter consumption) over the 21 years from 2001 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.2E-14. 0.0000000000000416825250742558
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 4.2E-12% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 23,990,869,032,491 random variables You don't actually need 23 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.94, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Butter consumption (Pounds per person)4.34.44.54.54.54.74.7554.95.45.55.55.55.65.75.766.26.36.5
Ticket prices at North American movie theaters (Price in dollars)5.665.816.036.216.416.556.887.187.57.897.937.968.138.178.438.658.979.119.169.4110.4




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.3,4.4,4.5,4.5,4.5,4.7,4.7,5,5,4.9,5.4,5.5,5.5,5.5,5.6,5.7,5.7,6,6.2,6.3,6.5,])
array_2 = np.array([5.66,5.81,6.03,6.21,6.41,6.55,6.88,7.18,7.5,7.89,7.93,7.96,8.13,8.17,8.43,8.65,8.97,9.11,9.16,9.41,10.4,])
array_1_name = "Butter consumption"
array_2_name = "Ticket prices at North American movie theaters"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 1604 · Black Variable ID: 557 · Red Variable ID: 41
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0