about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,571 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Kennewick, Washington and the second variable is Total number of automotive recalls.  The chart goes from 1986 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The increase in air pollution in Kennewick, Washington has led to a rise in the number of disgruntled sentient cars, prompting them to report issues and demand recalls at a higher rate. It's a classic case of smog-induced car-kerfuffle syndrome!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a smoggy day in Kennewick, Washington, where a line of cars is waiting for recall service at a local dealership. The haze of the sky should contribute to the concerns about air quality, giving a sense of the less than ideal environmental conditions in the city. The cars should be seen waiting in line against the backdrop of the hazy, polluted sky, creating a visually striking depiction of the less than ideal air quality in Kennewick. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Less than ideal air quality in Kennewick, Washington and Total number of automotive recalls. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' 3D Pixar Style Celtic art inspired by bauhaus Cute 2D animation
ChatGPT: Less than ideal air quality in Kennewick, Washington

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Less than ideal air quality in Kennewick, Washington and Total number of automotive recalls together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Kennewick, Washington, a hazy sky looms over the city as cars line up for a recall service at the local dealership, adding to the concerns about air quality.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Less than ideal air quality in Kennewick, Washington ] and depicting this scene: In Kennewick, Washington, a hazy sky looms over the city as cars line up for a recall service at the local dealership, adding to the concerns about air quality. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a smoggy day in Kennewick, Washington, where a line of cars is waiting for recall service at a local dealership. The haze of the sky should contribute to the concerns about air quality, giving a sense of the less than ideal environmental conditions in the city. The cars should be seen waiting in line against the backdrop of the hazy, polluted sky, creating a visually striking depiction of the less than ideal air quality in Kennewick.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Kennewick, Washington caused Total number of automotive recalls to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Air-mazing Pollution: The Link Between Air Quality and Automotive Recalls in Kennewick, Washington

The Journal of Ecological Epidemiology and Automotive Engineering

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Kennewick, Washington and Total number of automotive recalls. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7043494 and p < 0.01 for 1986 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Air-mazing Pollution: The Link Between Air Quality and Automotive Recalls in Kennewick, Washington

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating relationship between air pollution and the total number of automotive recalls in Kennewick, Washington. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Department of Transportation (DOT) spanning from 1986 to 2022, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to unravel the intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.7043494 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling association between the two variables. This research sheds light on the impact of air quality on automotive performance, illustrating the importance of breathing easy to keep your vehicle running smoothly.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Kennewick, Washington and Total number of automotive recalls. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air-mazing Pollution: The Link Between Air Quality and Automotive Recalls in Kennewick, Washington

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating relationship between air pollution and the total number of automotive recalls in Kennewick, Washington. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Department of Transportation (DOT) spanning from 1986 to 2022, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to unravel the intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.7043494 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling association between the two variables. This research sheds light on the impact of air quality on automotive performance, illustrating the importance of breathing easy to keep your vehicle running smoothly.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The often overlooked relationship between air quality and automotive performance has long been an enigma shrouded in exhaust fumes. As vehicles zip through the streets of Kennewick, Washington, the air they breathe becomes a fascinating study in its own right. The pulsating dance of pollutants, swirling and twirling in the atmosphere, seems to have a peculiar influence on the mechanical well-being of our four-wheeled companions. This study unravels this intriguing connection, uncovering the hidden harmony or cacophony between the air we breathe and the vehicles we drive.

While the link between air pollution and human health has been well-studied, the impact of air quality on automotive machinery remains a breath of fresh air in the world of research. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Department of Transportation (DOT) over a span of nearly four decades, we embark on a journey to unmask the peculiar tango between pollutants and recalls, a dance as complex as a five-point turn in rush hour traffic.

Just as a skilled mechanic meticulously tunes an engine to purr like a satisfied feline, our statistical analysis delves into the numbers, teasing out correlations and patterns with the precision of a seasoned diagnostician. The results of our investigation reveal a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.7043494 and a p-value of less than 0.01, as if the data itself is pointing and shouting, "Aha, there's something fishy in the air here!"

This research, akin to a mechanic shining a flashlight under the hood, shines a bright light on the impact of air quality on automotive performance. The findings present a convincing argument that breathing clean air is not only vital for biological beings but also seems to keep our trusty automobiles humming contentedly along the tarmac. So, sit back, buckle up, and prepare for a journey through the smog-filled, engine-revving world of air-mazing pollution and its impact on automotive recalls.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Kennewick, Washington and Total number of automotive recalls. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air-mazing Pollution: The Link Between Air Quality and Automotive Recalls in Kennewick, Washington

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating relationship between air pollution and the total number of automotive recalls in Kennewick, Washington. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Department of Transportation (DOT) spanning from 1986 to 2022, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to unravel the intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.7043494 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling association between the two variables. This research sheds light on the impact of air quality on automotive performance, illustrating the importance of breathing easy to keep your vehicle running smoothly.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The often overlooked relationship between air quality and automotive performance has long been an enigma shrouded in exhaust fumes. As vehicles zip through the streets of Kennewick, Washington, the air they breathe becomes a fascinating study in its own right. The pulsating dance of pollutants, swirling and twirling in the atmosphere, seems to have a peculiar influence on the mechanical well-being of our four-wheeled companions. This study unravels this intriguing connection, uncovering the hidden harmony or cacophony between the air we breathe and the vehicles we drive.
While the link between air pollution and human health has been well-studied, the impact of air quality on automotive machinery remains a breath of fresh air in the world of research. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Department of Transportation (DOT) over a span of nearly four decades, we embark on a journey to unmask the peculiar tango between pollutants and recalls, a dance as complex as a five-point turn in rush hour traffic.
Just as a skilled mechanic meticulously tunes an engine to purr like a satisfied feline, our statistical analysis delves into the numbers, teasing out correlations and patterns with the precision of a seasoned diagnostician. The results of our investigation reveal a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.7043494 and a p-value of less than 0.01, as if the data itself is pointing and shouting, "Aha, there's something fishy in the air here!"
This research, akin to a mechanic shining a flashlight under the hood, shines a bright light on the impact of air quality on automotive performance. The findings present a convincing argument that breathing clean air is not only vital for biological beings but also seems to keep our trusty automobiles humming contentedly along the tarmac. So, sit back, buckle up, and prepare for a journey through the smog-filled, engine-revving world of air-mazing pollution and its impact on automotive recalls.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between air quality and automotive performance has been a subject of increasing interest in recent years, as researchers seek to uncover the hidden mysteries lurking within the swirling mists of pollution. The complex interplay between these two variables has spurred numerous studies, beginning with Smith et al.'s seminal work in "The Journal of Air Quality and Automotive Engineering," where the authors find a preliminary correlation between particulate matter and engine malfunctions. This set the stage for further exploration, leading to Doe and Jones' investigation in "Environmental Medicine and Automotive Technology," which delves into the impact of nitrogen oxides on vehicle emissions and safety recalls.

As the field expanded, the literature encompassed a diverse array of sources, ranging from non-fiction works such as "Air Pollution and Its Effects on Automotive Systems" by Green, to "The Automotive Chronicles of Atmospheric Chaos" by Blue. The latter, while not strictly within the academic domain, provides a whimsical yet oddly compelling narrative of the tumultuous relationship between vehicular machinery and the ever-changing atmospheric conditions. Additionally, the fictitious accounts in "The Diesel Diaries: A Tale of Tarnished Tailpipes" by Red, and "Carbon Monoxide Capers: The Misadventures of an Exhaust System" by Yellow, offer an imaginative glimpse into the world of automotive troubles amidst a backdrop of air pollution turmoil. While these may not be traditional research publications, they contribute to the wider tapestry of literature surrounding our topic.

Furthermore, social media platforms have proven to be an unexpected wellspring of informal, yet oddly insightful, observations related to the subject matter. A tweet by @CleanAirCarEnthusiast proclaimed, "Is it just me, or does poor air quality seem to coincide with a surge in automotive recalls? #AirMazingConnections #BreatheEasyDriveSmooth." This casual remark, while not backed by scientific rigor, hints at the growing awareness of the potential link between air pollution and automotive malfunctions among the public at large.

In summary, the literature on the connection between air pollution in Kennewick, Washington and the total number of automotive recalls encompasses a wide spectrum of sources, ranging from rigorous academic studies to imaginative narratives and even informal social media musings. As we delve into our own investigation, it is essential to consider the breadth of existing knowledge and the unexpected insights waiting to be unearthed amidst the haze of exhaust and the purr of engines.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Kennewick, Washington and Total number of automotive recalls. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and US DOT . You used data from 1986 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air-mazing Pollution: The Link Between Air Quality and Automotive Recalls in Kennewick, Washington

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating relationship between air pollution and the total number of automotive recalls in Kennewick, Washington. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Department of Transportation (DOT) spanning from 1986 to 2022, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to unravel the intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.7043494 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling association between the two variables. This research sheds light on the impact of air quality on automotive performance, illustrating the importance of breathing easy to keep your vehicle running smoothly.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The often overlooked relationship between air quality and automotive performance has long been an enigma shrouded in exhaust fumes. As vehicles zip through the streets of Kennewick, Washington, the air they breathe becomes a fascinating study in its own right. The pulsating dance of pollutants, swirling and twirling in the atmosphere, seems to have a peculiar influence on the mechanical well-being of our four-wheeled companions. This study unravels this intriguing connection, uncovering the hidden harmony or cacophony between the air we breathe and the vehicles we drive.
While the link between air pollution and human health has been well-studied, the impact of air quality on automotive machinery remains a breath of fresh air in the world of research. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Department of Transportation (DOT) over a span of nearly four decades, we embark on a journey to unmask the peculiar tango between pollutants and recalls, a dance as complex as a five-point turn in rush hour traffic.
Just as a skilled mechanic meticulously tunes an engine to purr like a satisfied feline, our statistical analysis delves into the numbers, teasing out correlations and patterns with the precision of a seasoned diagnostician. The results of our investigation reveal a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.7043494 and a p-value of less than 0.01, as if the data itself is pointing and shouting, "Aha, there's something fishy in the air here!"
This research, akin to a mechanic shining a flashlight under the hood, shines a bright light on the impact of air quality on automotive performance. The findings present a convincing argument that breathing clean air is not only vital for biological beings but also seems to keep our trusty automobiles humming contentedly along the tarmac. So, sit back, buckle up, and prepare for a journey through the smog-filled, engine-revving world of air-mazing pollution and its impact on automotive recalls.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the knotty connection between air pollution and automotive recalls in Kennewick, Washington, we employed a methodological mishmash that could be likened to a concoction worthy of a mad scientist in his laboratory. First, we gathered data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Department of Transportation (DOT), as if embarking on a treasure hunt through the labyrinthine archives of governmental databases. The years spanning from 1986 to 2022 were our breadcrumb trail, guiding us through the thickets of historical vehicular and environmental data.

With our metaphorical magnifying glasses and statistical tweezers in hand, we undertook a rigorous process of data cleaning and manipulation, akin to wiping grease and grime off spark plugs before a thorough examination. We filtered, smoothened, and polished the raw data, snipping off any rough edges and outliers with the precision of a surgeon amputating a statistical anomaly.

Once the data was pruned and prepped for analysis, we then unleashed the ferocious power of correlation analysis, akin to unleashing a pack of bloodhounds on the trail of a scent. We sought to uncover any scent, no matter how faint, of a relationship between air pollution and the total number of automotive recalls. Our statistical toolkit included Pearson's correlation coefficient and the venerable p-value, scrutinizing their significance levels with the fervor of a detective peering through a magnifying glass for the tiniest clue.

Furthermore, we wielded the fearsome weapon of multiple regression analysis, constructing models like a kid tinkering with a box of Lego pieces, in an attempt to discern the complex interplay of various air pollutants on the frequency of automotive recalls. The coefficients and interaction terms danced an intricate tango, revealing the convoluted relationship between polluting agents and vehicular malfunctions.

Our statistical maneuvers and data manipulations culminated in the unveiling of a correlation coefficient of 0.7043494 and a p-value of less than 0.01, as if the data itself were exclaiming, "Eureka!" We also sought to control for potential confounding variables, ensuring that the associations we discovered were indeed as clear and crisp as a freshly inflated tire.

In summary, our methodology resembled a hodgepodge of statistical analyses, data wrangling wizardry, and methodological meanderings, all aimed at unraveling the quirky interplay of air pollution and automotive recalls in Kennewick, Washington. Our findings stand as a testament to the meticulousness of our approach and the sheer audacity of our quest to demystify the enigmatic dance between pollutants and vehicle performance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Kennewick, Washington and Total number of automotive recalls. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and US DOT .

For the time period 1986 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7043494, r-squared of 0.4961081, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Air-mazing Pollution: The Link Between Air Quality and Automotive Recalls in Kennewick, Washington

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating relationship between air pollution and the total number of automotive recalls in Kennewick, Washington. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Department of Transportation (DOT) spanning from 1986 to 2022, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to unravel the intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.7043494 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling association between the two variables. This research sheds light on the impact of air quality on automotive performance, illustrating the importance of breathing easy to keep your vehicle running smoothly.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The often overlooked relationship between air quality and automotive performance has long been an enigma shrouded in exhaust fumes. As vehicles zip through the streets of Kennewick, Washington, the air they breathe becomes a fascinating study in its own right. The pulsating dance of pollutants, swirling and twirling in the atmosphere, seems to have a peculiar influence on the mechanical well-being of our four-wheeled companions. This study unravels this intriguing connection, uncovering the hidden harmony or cacophony between the air we breathe and the vehicles we drive.
While the link between air pollution and human health has been well-studied, the impact of air quality on automotive machinery remains a breath of fresh air in the world of research. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Department of Transportation (DOT) over a span of nearly four decades, we embark on a journey to unmask the peculiar tango between pollutants and recalls, a dance as complex as a five-point turn in rush hour traffic.
Just as a skilled mechanic meticulously tunes an engine to purr like a satisfied feline, our statistical analysis delves into the numbers, teasing out correlations and patterns with the precision of a seasoned diagnostician. The results of our investigation reveal a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.7043494 and a p-value of less than 0.01, as if the data itself is pointing and shouting, "Aha, there's something fishy in the air here!"
This research, akin to a mechanic shining a flashlight under the hood, shines a bright light on the impact of air quality on automotive performance. The findings present a convincing argument that breathing clean air is not only vital for biological beings but also seems to keep our trusty automobiles humming contentedly along the tarmac. So, sit back, buckle up, and prepare for a journey through the smog-filled, engine-revving world of air-mazing pollution and its impact on automotive recalls.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis conducted on the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Department of Transportation (DOT) from 1986 to 2022 revealed a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.7043494 between air pollution in Kennewick, Washington and the total number of automotive recalls. This moderately strong positive correlation suggests that as the level of air pollution increases, so does the number of automotive recalls, or in other words, as the air quality goes downhill, so does the maintenance of our four-wheeled companions.

The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.4961081 indicates that approximately 49.61% of the variation in the total number of automotive recalls in Kennewick can be explained by the variation in air pollution levels. This finding supports the notion that there is a substantial relationship between air quality and the frequency of automotive recalls. It seems that as the air quality becomes more "exhausting," our dear automobiles are compelled to "air" their grievances with more frequent recall events.

Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is statistically significant and not simply a fluke of the data. This statistical result speaks louder than a honking car horn in rush hour traffic, emphasizing the robustness of the relationship between air pollution and automotive recalls.

To visually capture the nature of this relationship, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between air pollution levels and the total number of automotive recalls in Kennewick, Washington. The points on the graph dance like leaves caught in a gusty wind, tracing out a pattern that tells a compelling story of air quality's influence on the vehicular world.

In conclusion, our findings establish a thought-provoking association between air pollution and automotive recalls in Kennewick, Washington, shedding light on the impact of air quality on the performance and maintenance of our cherished four-wheeled companions. This research not only deepens our understanding of the effects of air pollution but also serves as a gentle reminder to keep our engines running smoothly by taking a breather and ensuring that the air around us is as clean as the oil in our trusty automobiles.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Kennewick, Washington and Total number of automotive recalls. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Air-mazing Pollution: The Link Between Air Quality and Automotive Recalls in Kennewick, Washington

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating relationship between air pollution and the total number of automotive recalls in Kennewick, Washington. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Department of Transportation (DOT) spanning from 1986 to 2022, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to unravel the intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.7043494 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling association between the two variables. This research sheds light on the impact of air quality on automotive performance, illustrating the importance of breathing easy to keep your vehicle running smoothly.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between air quality and automotive performance has been a subject of increasing interest in recent years, as researchers seek to uncover the hidden mysteries lurking within the swirling mists of pollution. The complex interplay between these two variables has spurred numerous studies, beginning with Smith et al.'s seminal work in "The Journal of Air Quality and Automotive Engineering," where the authors find a preliminary correlation between particulate matter and engine malfunctions. This set the stage for further exploration, leading to Doe and Jones' investigation in "Environmental Medicine and Automotive Technology," which delves into the impact of nitrogen oxides on vehicle emissions and safety recalls.
As the field expanded, the literature encompassed a diverse array of sources, ranging from non-fiction works such as "Air Pollution and Its Effects on Automotive Systems" by Green, to "The Automotive Chronicles of Atmospheric Chaos" by Blue. The latter, while not strictly within the academic domain, provides a whimsical yet oddly compelling narrative of the tumultuous relationship between vehicular machinery and the ever-changing atmospheric conditions. Additionally, the fictitious accounts in "The Diesel Diaries: A Tale of Tarnished Tailpipes" by Red, and "Carbon Monoxide Capers: The Misadventures of an Exhaust System" by Yellow, offer an imaginative glimpse into the world of automotive troubles amidst a backdrop of air pollution turmoil. While these may not be traditional research publications, they contribute to the wider tapestry of literature surrounding our topic.
Furthermore, social media platforms have proven to be an unexpected wellspring of informal, yet oddly insightful, observations related to the subject matter. A tweet by @CleanAirCarEnthusiast proclaimed, "Is it just me, or does poor air quality seem to coincide with a surge in automotive recalls? #AirMazingConnections #BreatheEasyDriveSmooth." This casual remark, while not backed by scientific rigor, hints at the growing awareness of the potential link between air pollution and automotive malfunctions among the public at large.
In summary, the literature on the connection between air pollution in Kennewick, Washington and the total number of automotive recalls encompasses a wide spectrum of sources, ranging from rigorous academic studies to imaginative narratives and even informal social media musings. As we delve into our own investigation, it is essential to consider the breadth of existing knowledge and the unexpected insights waiting to be unearthed amidst the haze of exhaust and the purr of engines.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted on the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Department of Transportation (DOT) from 1986 to 2022 revealed a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.7043494 between air pollution in Kennewick, Washington and the total number of automotive recalls. This moderately strong positive correlation suggests that as the level of air pollution increases, so does the number of automotive recalls, or in other words, as the air quality goes downhill, so does the maintenance of our four-wheeled companions.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.4961081 indicates that approximately 49.61% of the variation in the total number of automotive recalls in Kennewick can be explained by the variation in air pollution levels. This finding supports the notion that there is a substantial relationship between air quality and the frequency of automotive recalls. It seems that as the air quality becomes more "exhausting," our dear automobiles are compelled to "air" their grievances with more frequent recall events.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is statistically significant and not simply a fluke of the data. This statistical result speaks louder than a honking car horn in rush hour traffic, emphasizing the robustness of the relationship between air pollution and automotive recalls.
To visually capture the nature of this relationship, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between air pollution levels and the total number of automotive recalls in Kennewick, Washington. The points on the graph dance like leaves caught in a gusty wind, tracing out a pattern that tells a compelling story of air quality's influence on the vehicular world.
In conclusion, our findings establish a thought-provoking association between air pollution and automotive recalls in Kennewick, Washington, shedding light on the impact of air quality on the performance and maintenance of our cherished four-wheeled companions. This research not only deepens our understanding of the effects of air pollution but also serves as a gentle reminder to keep our engines running smoothly by taking a breather and ensuring that the air around us is as clean as the oil in our trusty automobiles.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The results of our study presented an "air"-resistible connection between air pollution in Kennewick, Washington and the total number of automotive recalls, providing robust support for prior research. Our findings echoed the initial foray into this enigmatic realm by Smith et al., where the link between particulate matter and engine malfunctions was first uncovered. Much like a well-orchestrated symphony, our data harmonized with the subsequent work of Doe and Jones, reinforcing the impact of nitrogen oxides on vehicular emissions and recalls. These discoveries "air" due credit to the tireless efforts of previous researchers who paved the way for our own "exhaust"-ive investigation.

The expansive tapestry of literature we encountered during our review served as a source of unexpected inspiration, with whimsical narratives and even Twitter musings proving surprisingly insightful. While not your typical scholarly fare, these unconventional sources provided colorful threads to weave into the fabric of our understanding. Who would have thought that "The Diesel Diaries" and "Carbon Monoxide Capers" might hold nuggets of truth amid their fictitious escapades? The diverse repertoire of literature offered a multifaceted view of the relationship between air pollution and automotive recalls, blending serious insights with a dash of levity.

Our statistically "tire"-less analysis showcased a correlation coefficient (r) that speaks volumes, linking higher air pollution levels to an increase in automotive recalls. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) substantiated this connection, revealing that nearly half of the variation in recalls could be attributed to fluctuations in air quality. This certainly drives home the point that the quality of air we "ex-haust" directly impacts the "air"-guments our vehicles have with their own well-being.

The p-value, akin to a resounding honk amidst the clamor of statistical noise, bolstered our findings by demonstrating the statistical significance of the observed correlation. It was a reminder that our results were not merely a fluke, but rather a robust indication of the impactful relationship between air pollution and automotive recalls. The visual depiction of this connection in our scatterplot, akin to a dance of data points, imparted a vivid illustration of the intricate interplay between air quality and automotive maintenance.

In the grand scheme of vehicular well-being, our study offers a glimpse into the intricate "air"-nvironmental factors shaping the fate of our four-wheeled companions. As the tires of knowledge keep turning, it is our hope that this research not only "fuels" further exploration into the influence of air pollution on automotive performance but also "drives" a shift towards cleaner air for both machines and their human counterparts. After all, it's not just about breathing easy; it's about ensuring our vehicles can "air"-ly navigate the "polluted" pathways of automotive maintenance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Kennewick, Washington and Total number of automotive recalls. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Air-mazing Pollution: The Link Between Air Quality and Automotive Recalls in Kennewick, Washington

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the fascinating relationship between air pollution and the total number of automotive recalls in Kennewick, Washington. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Department of Transportation (DOT) spanning from 1986 to 2022, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to unravel the intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.7043494 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling association between the two variables. This research sheds light on the impact of air quality on automotive performance, illustrating the importance of breathing easy to keep your vehicle running smoothly.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The often overlooked relationship between air quality and automotive performance has long been an enigma shrouded in exhaust fumes. As vehicles zip through the streets of Kennewick, Washington, the air they breathe becomes a fascinating study in its own right. The pulsating dance of pollutants, swirling and twirling in the atmosphere, seems to have a peculiar influence on the mechanical well-being of our four-wheeled companions. This study unravels this intriguing connection, uncovering the hidden harmony or cacophony between the air we breathe and the vehicles we drive.
While the link between air pollution and human health has been well-studied, the impact of air quality on automotive machinery remains a breath of fresh air in the world of research. By analyzing data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Department of Transportation (DOT) over a span of nearly four decades, we embark on a journey to unmask the peculiar tango between pollutants and recalls, a dance as complex as a five-point turn in rush hour traffic.
Just as a skilled mechanic meticulously tunes an engine to purr like a satisfied feline, our statistical analysis delves into the numbers, teasing out correlations and patterns with the precision of a seasoned diagnostician. The results of our investigation reveal a compelling correlation coefficient of 0.7043494 and a p-value of less than 0.01, as if the data itself is pointing and shouting, "Aha, there's something fishy in the air here!"
This research, akin to a mechanic shining a flashlight under the hood, shines a bright light on the impact of air quality on automotive performance. The findings present a convincing argument that breathing clean air is not only vital for biological beings but also seems to keep our trusty automobiles humming contentedly along the tarmac. So, sit back, buckle up, and prepare for a journey through the smog-filled, engine-revving world of air-mazing pollution and its impact on automotive recalls.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted on the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Department of Transportation (DOT) from 1986 to 2022 revealed a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.7043494 between air pollution in Kennewick, Washington and the total number of automotive recalls. This moderately strong positive correlation suggests that as the level of air pollution increases, so does the number of automotive recalls, or in other words, as the air quality goes downhill, so does the maintenance of our four-wheeled companions.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.4961081 indicates that approximately 49.61% of the variation in the total number of automotive recalls in Kennewick can be explained by the variation in air pollution levels. This finding supports the notion that there is a substantial relationship between air quality and the frequency of automotive recalls. It seems that as the air quality becomes more "exhausting," our dear automobiles are compelled to "air" their grievances with more frequent recall events.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed correlation is statistically significant and not simply a fluke of the data. This statistical result speaks louder than a honking car horn in rush hour traffic, emphasizing the robustness of the relationship between air pollution and automotive recalls.
To visually capture the nature of this relationship, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between air pollution levels and the total number of automotive recalls in Kennewick, Washington. The points on the graph dance like leaves caught in a gusty wind, tracing out a pattern that tells a compelling story of air quality's influence on the vehicular world.
In conclusion, our findings establish a thought-provoking association between air pollution and automotive recalls in Kennewick, Washington, shedding light on the impact of air quality on the performance and maintenance of our cherished four-wheeled companions. This research not only deepens our understanding of the effects of air pollution but also serves as a gentle reminder to keep our engines running smoothly by taking a breather and ensuring that the air around us is as clean as the oil in our trusty automobiles.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
In wrapping up our study, we have successfully unraveled the intertwined relationship between air pollution and automotive recalls in Kennewick, Washington. The significant correlation coefficient and p-value, akin to spotting a rare car in a sea of traffic, emphasize the robustness and integrity of the association we have unveiled. It seems that the air in Kennewick has been whispering secrets to our cars, compelling them to spin recall events as frequent as a revolving door in a busy shopping mall. As the vehicles choke on the polluted air, their grievances become a honking siren in the landscape of statistical data.

Our findings offer a breath of fresh air for those curious about the mysterious rapport between air quality and automotive maintenance. The association uncovered in this study should serve as a reminder to all automotive enthusiasts and environmental advocates that breathing easy not only benefits our lungs but also keeps our vehicles purring with contentment. It presents a thought-provoking case for the intertwined dance of pollutants and car performance, elevating the conversation beyond mere emissions into the shared world of vehicular well-being.

Ultimately, it seems that we have exhausted all avenues of investigation in this air-mazing realm. There appear to be no more stones unturned or exhaust pipes unprobed in relation to the impact of air quality on automotive recalls in Kennewick, Washington. Our research findings stand as a testament to the intriguing relationship between the air we breathe and the vehicles we drive, concluding that no further research is necessary in this area. It's time to roll up the windows and drive off into the sunset, leaving this mystery of air, gas, and recalls in our rear-view mirror.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Air-mazing Pollution: The Link Between Air Quality and Automotive Recalls in Kennewick, Washington. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Epidemiology and Automotive Engineering


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Air-mazing Pollution: The Link Between Air Quality and Automotive Recalls in Kennewick, Washington. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Airborne Vehicular Studies (IAVS)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Air-mazing Pollution: The Link Between Air Quality and Automotive Recalls in Kennewick, Washington with an abstract of This study delves into the fascinating relationship between air pollution and the total number of automotive recalls in Kennewick, Washington. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Department of Transportation (DOT) spanning from 1986 to 2022, we employed rigorous statistical analysis to unravel the intriguing connection. Our findings reveal a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.7043494 and a p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a compelling association between the two variables. This research sheds light on the impact of air quality on automotive performance, illustrating the importance of breathing easy to keep your vehicle running smoothly.

ChatGPT:

Air pollution, automotive recalls, air quality, Kennewick Washington, Environmental Protection Agency data, US Department of Transportation data, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, vehicle performance, breathing easy, automotive performance, pollution impact, association between air quality and automotive recalls

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Kennewick, Washington
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Kennewick-Richland, WA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Kennewick, Washington

Total number of automotive recalls
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Total number of automotive recalls

Correlation r = 0.7043494 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4961081 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 49.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total number of automotive recalls) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Kennewick, Washington) over the 37 years from 1986 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.1E-6. 0.0000011446869509127118000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.7 in 0.00011% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 873,601 random variables You don't actually need 873 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 36 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 36 because we have two variables measured over a period of 37 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.49, 0.84 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Kennewick, Washington (Bad air quality days)0.08187130.07692310.1558440.05421690.1161290.09608540.03076920.06134970.03492060.009584670.01846150.01277960.02962960.07763980.1339290.09302330.08938550.1369860.1693990.1726030.1945210.1808220.1693990.1150680.07945210.1101930.133880.1671230.08791210.1988950.1120220.2575340.2082190.1698630.133880.1835620.172603
Total number of automotive recalls (Recalls)2192522412812702812172642883573413184134446215595106006996456137137805707226556617108699711031897103296388310931050




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.0818713,0.0769231,0.155844,0.0542169,0.116129,0.0960854,0.0307692,0.0613497,0.0349206,0.00958467,0.0184615,0.0127796,0.0296296,0.0776398,0.133929,0.0930233,0.0893855,0.136986,0.169399,0.172603,0.194521,0.180822,0.169399,0.115068,0.0794521,0.110193,0.13388,0.167123,0.0879121,0.198895,0.112022,0.257534,0.208219,0.169863,0.13388,0.183562,0.172603,])
array_2 = np.array([219,252,241,281,270,281,217,264,288,357,341,318,413,444,621,559,510,600,699,645,613,713,780,570,722,655,661,710,869,971,1031,897,1032,963,883,1093,1050,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Kennewick, Washington"
array_2_name = "Total number of automotive recalls"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 1571 · Black Variable ID: 21840 · Red Variable ID: 1116
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0