about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,485 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Butter consumption and the second variable is The number of logisticians in Utah.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As butter consumption increased, more people experienced a slippery situation when it came to managing their logistics. This led to a higher demand for logisticians in Utah who could butter up the supply chain and keep everything running smoothly. It seems like there's a direct correlation between buttery spreads and the need for logistical experts - talk about a dairy funny connection! It's udderly ridiculous, but it seems like the secret ingredient to a booming logistics industry in Utah might just be butter after all!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that resembles a TIME magazine cover with a cozy kitchen in Utah as the background. In the foreground, there is a plate of warm toast covered in a generous layer of golden butter. In the corner of the room, a group of logisticians are gathered around a table, deep in discussion, with their notebooks and pens at the ready. The lighting should be warm and inviting, capturing the atmosphere of a productive and comforting setting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Butter consumption and The number of logisticians in Utah. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism Cutsy art illustration Magic realism Vaporwave A TIME magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Butter consumption and The number of logisticians in Utah together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy kitchen in Utah, a plate of warm toast is covered in a generous layer of golden butter. In the corner of the room, a group of logisticians are gathered around a table, deep in discussion, their notebooks and pens at the ready.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy kitchen in Utah, a plate of warm toast is covered in a generous layer of golden butter. In the corner of the room, a group of logisticians are gathered around a table, deep in discussion, their notebooks and pens at the ready. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that resembles a TIME magazine cover with a cozy kitchen in Utah as the background. In the foreground, there is a plate of warm toast covered in a generous layer of golden butter. In the corner of the room, a group of logisticians are gathered around a table, deep in discussion, with their notebooks and pens at the ready. The lighting should be warm and inviting, capturing the atmosphere of a productive and comforting setting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Butter consumption caused The number of logisticians in Utah to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Spreading the Connection: A Butterly Analysis of Butter Consumption and the Quantity of Logisticians in Utah

The Journal of Culinary Statistics and Regional Demographics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and The number of logisticians in Utah. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9186018 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Connection: A Butterly Analysis of Butter Consumption and the Quantity of Logisticians in Utah

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study examines the perplexing relationship between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in the state of Utah, utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9186018 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2021. This research aims to butter our understanding of the unexpected ties between dietary habits and occupational statistics, churning out insights that may spread across diverse disciplines.

Upon analyzing the data, our research team discovered a positively buttered correlation between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah. The findings suggest that as butter consumption increases, the number of logisticians in the state also rises, although causation cannot be inferred from this cross-sectional analysis. As one might say, the relationship between butter consumption and logistician employment in Utah could be seen as "spreading like creamy, delicious wildfire."

This study reiterates the importance of considering unorthodox factors in examining labor market trends. The unexpected correlation opens the door to a whole new field of research, giving a whole new meaning to the phrase "adding butter to one's knowledge."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and The number of logisticians in Utah. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Connection: A Butterly Analysis of Butter Consumption and the Quantity of Logisticians in Utah

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study examines the perplexing relationship between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in the state of Utah, utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9186018 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2021. This research aims to butter our understanding of the unexpected ties between dietary habits and occupational statistics, churning out insights that may spread across diverse disciplines.

Upon analyzing the data, our research team discovered a positively buttered correlation between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah. The findings suggest that as butter consumption increases, the number of logisticians in the state also rises, although causation cannot be inferred from this cross-sectional analysis. As one might say, the relationship between butter consumption and logistician employment in Utah could be seen as "spreading like creamy, delicious wildfire."

This study reiterates the importance of considering unorthodox factors in examining labor market trends. The unexpected correlation opens the door to a whole new field of research, giving a whole new meaning to the phrase "adding butter to one's knowledge."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The study of labor market trends has traditionally focused on factors such as educational attainment, economic conditions, and technological advancements. However, the exploration of the interplay between dietary habits and occupational statistics has remained relatively uncharted territory. In this study, we delve into the curious association between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in the state of Utah, aiming to churn out new insights into this unexpected correlation.

As we butter our way through the data, we aim to spread awareness of the potential impact of butter consumption on the job market. With every bite of toast and dollop of butter, could there be a subtle influence on the employment landscape for logisticians in Utah? The possibilities are as intriguing as the creamy spread itself.

The unexpected ties discovered in our analysis present a stirring reminder of the need to consider unconventional influencers in labor market dynamics. The correlation between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in Utah may be seen as a "butterfly effect" on the state's employment landscape. This unexpected connection could indeed be characterized as a "spreadsheet" of data that transcends the confines of traditional labor market analysis.

As we delve into this unexplored terrain, it becomes apparent that the relationship between butter consumption and logistician employment in Utah is more than just a statistical curiosity. It is a creamy conundrum that prompts us to rethink the boundaries of labor market research. This revelation serves as a reminder that there may be more to the ebb and flow of employment statistics than meets the eye - or the palate.

The findings of this study invite further exploration and analysis, as we strive to spread the understanding of seemingly disparate factors that may influence labor market trends. This unorthodox correlation between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah undoubtedly adds a new layer of complexity to the study of labor market dynamics and serves as a clarion call for interdisciplinary investigation.

In conclusion, the unexpected bond between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in Utah provides a rich ground for scholarly inquiry and buttery puns. It is indeed a reminder to embrace the unexpected and to be open to the spread of knowledge, even if it comes in the form of a seemingly innocuous dairy product.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and The number of logisticians in Utah. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Connection: A Butterly Analysis of Butter Consumption and the Quantity of Logisticians in Utah

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study examines the perplexing relationship between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in the state of Utah, utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9186018 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2021. This research aims to butter our understanding of the unexpected ties between dietary habits and occupational statistics, churning out insights that may spread across diverse disciplines.

Upon analyzing the data, our research team discovered a positively buttered correlation between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah. The findings suggest that as butter consumption increases, the number of logisticians in the state also rises, although causation cannot be inferred from this cross-sectional analysis. As one might say, the relationship between butter consumption and logistician employment in Utah could be seen as "spreading like creamy, delicious wildfire."

This study reiterates the importance of considering unorthodox factors in examining labor market trends. The unexpected correlation opens the door to a whole new field of research, giving a whole new meaning to the phrase "adding butter to one's knowledge."

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of labor market trends has traditionally focused on factors such as educational attainment, economic conditions, and technological advancements. However, the exploration of the interplay between dietary habits and occupational statistics has remained relatively uncharted territory. In this study, we delve into the curious association between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in the state of Utah, aiming to churn out new insights into this unexpected correlation.
As we butter our way through the data, we aim to spread awareness of the potential impact of butter consumption on the job market. With every bite of toast and dollop of butter, could there be a subtle influence on the employment landscape for logisticians in Utah? The possibilities are as intriguing as the creamy spread itself.
The unexpected ties discovered in our analysis present a stirring reminder of the need to consider unconventional influencers in labor market dynamics. The correlation between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in Utah may be seen as a "butterfly effect" on the state's employment landscape. This unexpected connection could indeed be characterized as a "spreadsheet" of data that transcends the confines of traditional labor market analysis.
As we delve into this unexplored terrain, it becomes apparent that the relationship between butter consumption and logistician employment in Utah is more than just a statistical curiosity. It is a creamy conundrum that prompts us to rethink the boundaries of labor market research. This revelation serves as a reminder that there may be more to the ebb and flow of employment statistics than meets the eye - or the palate.
The findings of this study invite further exploration and analysis, as we strive to spread the understanding of seemingly disparate factors that may influence labor market trends. This unorthodox correlation between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah undoubtedly adds a new layer of complexity to the study of labor market dynamics and serves as a clarion call for interdisciplinary investigation.
In conclusion, the unexpected bond between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in Utah provides a rich ground for scholarly inquiry and buttery puns. It is indeed a reminder to embrace the unexpected and to be open to the spread of knowledge, even if it comes in the form of a seemingly innocuous dairy product.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al. (2015)," the authors find that dietary habits may have unanticipated effects on occupational statistics. This study marks one of the initial forays into uncovering unforeseen correlations between food consumption and employment trends. As the authors delve into the connections between dietary patterns and labor market dynamics, they pave the way for future research to explore unconventional influencers in the employment landscape. The findings of this study initiate a thought-provoking discourse on the interplay between daily sustenance and professional pursuits.

In "Doe and Johnson (2018)," the authors delve into the nuances of dietary influences on regional employment patterns. By scrutinizing the correlations between specific food items and occupational categories, the study sheds light on the potential impact of dietary habits on the job market. The findings provoke contemplation on the multifaceted factors that may contribute to employment trends, challenging traditional paradigms in labor market analysis. The study underscores the need to adopt an expansive perspective when examining the intricate tapestry of employment statistics.

Turning attention to related literature, the work of Pollan (2008) in "In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto" and Teicholz (2014) in "The Big Fat Surprise: Why Butter, Meat, and Cheese Belong in a Healthy Diet" emphasizes the significance of dietary choices on overall wellbeing. The profound impact of dietary habits on health and lifestyle choices offers a compelling backdrop for investigations into their potential influence on occupational trends. The intersection of dietary decisions and professional outcomes forms a rich terrain for scholarly inquiry, nurturing the fertile ground for unexpected connections and revelations.

Furthermore, exploring fictional narratives such as Murakami's "Kafka on the Shore" and Tolstoy's "Anna Karenina" offers a unique perspective on the interwoven complexities of human experiences. While these literary works may not directly address the relationship between butter consumption and logistician employment in Utah, they prompt reflection on the intricate web of causality and the unforeseen effects of seemingly unrelated variables. The parallel drawn between literary explorations and empirical research underscores the intricate nature of uncovering unexpected correlations, inviting contemplation on the whimsical nature of scholarly pursuits.

As we venture into less conventional sources of insight, it is worth noting the unexpected revelations that may arise from unorthodox mediums. While perusing the aisles of a local grocery store, one may chance upon insightful anecdotes embedded within the printed ephemera of shopping receipts. The casual observation of patterns in butter purchases and the employment trajectory of logisticians in Utah may yield unexpectedly illuminating revelations, highlighting the serendipitous nature of scholarly investigation and the potential sources of inspiration that lie hidden in everyday encounters.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and The number of logisticians in Utah. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2004 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Connection: A Butterly Analysis of Butter Consumption and the Quantity of Logisticians in Utah

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study examines the perplexing relationship between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in the state of Utah, utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9186018 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2021. This research aims to butter our understanding of the unexpected ties between dietary habits and occupational statistics, churning out insights that may spread across diverse disciplines.

Upon analyzing the data, our research team discovered a positively buttered correlation between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah. The findings suggest that as butter consumption increases, the number of logisticians in the state also rises, although causation cannot be inferred from this cross-sectional analysis. As one might say, the relationship between butter consumption and logistician employment in Utah could be seen as "spreading like creamy, delicious wildfire."

This study reiterates the importance of considering unorthodox factors in examining labor market trends. The unexpected correlation opens the door to a whole new field of research, giving a whole new meaning to the phrase "adding butter to one's knowledge."

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of labor market trends has traditionally focused on factors such as educational attainment, economic conditions, and technological advancements. However, the exploration of the interplay between dietary habits and occupational statistics has remained relatively uncharted territory. In this study, we delve into the curious association between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in the state of Utah, aiming to churn out new insights into this unexpected correlation.
As we butter our way through the data, we aim to spread awareness of the potential impact of butter consumption on the job market. With every bite of toast and dollop of butter, could there be a subtle influence on the employment landscape for logisticians in Utah? The possibilities are as intriguing as the creamy spread itself.
The unexpected ties discovered in our analysis present a stirring reminder of the need to consider unconventional influencers in labor market dynamics. The correlation between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in Utah may be seen as a "butterfly effect" on the state's employment landscape. This unexpected connection could indeed be characterized as a "spreadsheet" of data that transcends the confines of traditional labor market analysis.
As we delve into this unexplored terrain, it becomes apparent that the relationship between butter consumption and logistician employment in Utah is more than just a statistical curiosity. It is a creamy conundrum that prompts us to rethink the boundaries of labor market research. This revelation serves as a reminder that there may be more to the ebb and flow of employment statistics than meets the eye - or the palate.
The findings of this study invite further exploration and analysis, as we strive to spread the understanding of seemingly disparate factors that may influence labor market trends. This unorthodox correlation between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah undoubtedly adds a new layer of complexity to the study of labor market dynamics and serves as a clarion call for interdisciplinary investigation.
In conclusion, the unexpected bond between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in Utah provides a rich ground for scholarly inquiry and buttery puns. It is indeed a reminder to embrace the unexpected and to be open to the spread of knowledge, even if it comes in the form of a seemingly innocuous dairy product.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The data used in this study was collected from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) from the years 2004 to 2021. The research team scrutinized extensive datasets on per capita butter consumption and the number of logisticians employed in the state of Utah during this period. The analysis was conducted using rigorous statistical methods to ensure the robustness and reliability of the findings.

To elucidate the potential relationship between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah, a series of complex statistical analyses were performed. First, the data on butter consumption was carefully spread out and examined for any churns or irregularities. Furthermore, the data on the employment of logisticians in Utah was meticulously analyzed to ascertain the presence of any unanticipated correlations.

After the initial examination, the data underwent a meticulous process of sifting and churning to uncover patterns and associations. This involved using sophisticated statistical tools to unravel the intricate interplay between butter consumption and the number of logisticians, akin to peeling back the layers of an onion, or in this case, the layers of butter.

The data was subject to various statistical tests, including regression analysis, time-series analysis, and correlation coefficient calculations, to measure the strength and significance of the relationship between the variables under scrutiny. The research team employed advanced econometric techniques and algorithms, ensuring a thorough investigation of the potential causal pathways between butter consumption and logistician employment in Utah.

The statistical analyses were accompanied by extensive sensitivity and robustness checks, akin to ensuring that every piece of butter was thoroughly checked for quality before being incorporated into the mix. The research team took great care to mitigate any confounding factors that could skew the results, ensuring that the findings remained as unsalted and pure as possible.

In line with industry standards, the research team made use of state-of-the-art software packages for statistical analysis, which are widely recognized for their reliability and precision. These tools allowed for the meticulous manipulation and examination of the data, akin to the art of delicately spreading a thin layer of butter on a piece of toast to achieve the perfect coverage.

Finally, the findings were subject to rigorous peer review processes, ensuring that the statistical inferences and conclusions drawn from the analysis were thoroughly scrutinized and validated. The study adhered to the highest standards of scientific inquiry, with every effort made to churn out results that were as consistent and robust as possible.

The research team adopted a systematic and systematic approach, employing cutting-edge statistical methods and maintaining a stringent quality control protocol to decipher the curious correlation between butter consumption and the employment of logisticians in the state of Utah. The findings, presented in the subsequent section, shed light on the unexpected intertwining of dietary choices and occupational patterns, offering a new perspective on the intertwined nature of seemingly unrelated phenomena.

As we spread our statistical wings, we do hope that our findings will butter the field of labor market research. After all, when it comes to statistical analysis, there's no margarine for error.

Please let me know if you need anything else.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and The number of logisticians in Utah. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2004 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9186018, r-squared of 0.8438293, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Connection: A Butterly Analysis of Butter Consumption and the Quantity of Logisticians in Utah

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study examines the perplexing relationship between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in the state of Utah, utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9186018 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2021. This research aims to butter our understanding of the unexpected ties between dietary habits and occupational statistics, churning out insights that may spread across diverse disciplines.

Upon analyzing the data, our research team discovered a positively buttered correlation between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah. The findings suggest that as butter consumption increases, the number of logisticians in the state also rises, although causation cannot be inferred from this cross-sectional analysis. As one might say, the relationship between butter consumption and logistician employment in Utah could be seen as "spreading like creamy, delicious wildfire."

This study reiterates the importance of considering unorthodox factors in examining labor market trends. The unexpected correlation opens the door to a whole new field of research, giving a whole new meaning to the phrase "adding butter to one's knowledge."

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The study of labor market trends has traditionally focused on factors such as educational attainment, economic conditions, and technological advancements. However, the exploration of the interplay between dietary habits and occupational statistics has remained relatively uncharted territory. In this study, we delve into the curious association between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in the state of Utah, aiming to churn out new insights into this unexpected correlation.
As we butter our way through the data, we aim to spread awareness of the potential impact of butter consumption on the job market. With every bite of toast and dollop of butter, could there be a subtle influence on the employment landscape for logisticians in Utah? The possibilities are as intriguing as the creamy spread itself.
The unexpected ties discovered in our analysis present a stirring reminder of the need to consider unconventional influencers in labor market dynamics. The correlation between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in Utah may be seen as a "butterfly effect" on the state's employment landscape. This unexpected connection could indeed be characterized as a "spreadsheet" of data that transcends the confines of traditional labor market analysis.
As we delve into this unexplored terrain, it becomes apparent that the relationship between butter consumption and logistician employment in Utah is more than just a statistical curiosity. It is a creamy conundrum that prompts us to rethink the boundaries of labor market research. This revelation serves as a reminder that there may be more to the ebb and flow of employment statistics than meets the eye - or the palate.
The findings of this study invite further exploration and analysis, as we strive to spread the understanding of seemingly disparate factors that may influence labor market trends. This unorthodox correlation between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah undoubtedly adds a new layer of complexity to the study of labor market dynamics and serves as a clarion call for interdisciplinary investigation.
In conclusion, the unexpected bond between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in Utah provides a rich ground for scholarly inquiry and buttery puns. It is indeed a reminder to embrace the unexpected and to be open to the spread of knowledge, even if it comes in the form of a seemingly innocuous dairy product.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data spanning from 2004 to 2021 revealed a robust correlation between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in Utah, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9186018 and an r-squared of 0.8438293. The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship. This finding certainly raises the question: is the employment of logisticians in Utah directly influenced by the creamy delight that is butter?

Figure 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah. The pattern is as clear as the separation of cream from buttermilk, leaving little room for doubt regarding the association. The figure is reminiscent of a classic love story – the tale of butter and logisticians, a match made in statistical heaven.

The correlation uncovered in this study serves as a reminder that sometimes, the unlikeliest pairs can exhibit remarkable connections. Just as butter enlivens the flavor of a bland dish, it appears to have a palpable impact on the employment landscape for logisticians in Utah. One might say that this finding is as unexpected and delightful as stumbling upon the last pat of butter in an empty fridge – truly a rare and surprising discovery.

In conclusion, the results of this research not only unveil a distinctive bond between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah but also provide ample food for thought. The findings serve as a flavorful reminder of the intricate web of correlations that underpin labor market dynamics. As researchers continue to unravel the mysteries of the statistical universe, they may find that sometimes, the most unexpected linkages yield the most palatable insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and The number of logisticians in Utah. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Connection: A Butterly Analysis of Butter Consumption and the Quantity of Logisticians in Utah

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study examines the perplexing relationship between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in the state of Utah, utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9186018 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2021. This research aims to butter our understanding of the unexpected ties between dietary habits and occupational statistics, churning out insights that may spread across diverse disciplines.

Upon analyzing the data, our research team discovered a positively buttered correlation between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah. The findings suggest that as butter consumption increases, the number of logisticians in the state also rises, although causation cannot be inferred from this cross-sectional analysis. As one might say, the relationship between butter consumption and logistician employment in Utah could be seen as "spreading like creamy, delicious wildfire."

This study reiterates the importance of considering unorthodox factors in examining labor market trends. The unexpected correlation opens the door to a whole new field of research, giving a whole new meaning to the phrase "adding butter to one's knowledge."

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al. (2015)," the authors find that dietary habits may have unanticipated effects on occupational statistics. This study marks one of the initial forays into uncovering unforeseen correlations between food consumption and employment trends. As the authors delve into the connections between dietary patterns and labor market dynamics, they pave the way for future research to explore unconventional influencers in the employment landscape. The findings of this study initiate a thought-provoking discourse on the interplay between daily sustenance and professional pursuits.
In "Doe and Johnson (2018)," the authors delve into the nuances of dietary influences on regional employment patterns. By scrutinizing the correlations between specific food items and occupational categories, the study sheds light on the potential impact of dietary habits on the job market. The findings provoke contemplation on the multifaceted factors that may contribute to employment trends, challenging traditional paradigms in labor market analysis. The study underscores the need to adopt an expansive perspective when examining the intricate tapestry of employment statistics.
Turning attention to related literature, the work of Pollan (2008) in "In Defense of Food: An Eater's Manifesto" and Teicholz (2014) in "The Big Fat Surprise: Why Butter, Meat, and Cheese Belong in a Healthy Diet" emphasizes the significance of dietary choices on overall wellbeing. The profound impact of dietary habits on health and lifestyle choices offers a compelling backdrop for investigations into their potential influence on occupational trends. The intersection of dietary decisions and professional outcomes forms a rich terrain for scholarly inquiry, nurturing the fertile ground for unexpected connections and revelations.
Furthermore, exploring fictional narratives such as Murakami's "Kafka on the Shore" and Tolstoy's "Anna Karenina" offers a unique perspective on the interwoven complexities of human experiences. While these literary works may not directly address the relationship between butter consumption and logistician employment in Utah, they prompt reflection on the intricate web of causality and the unforeseen effects of seemingly unrelated variables. The parallel drawn between literary explorations and empirical research underscores the intricate nature of uncovering unexpected correlations, inviting contemplation on the whimsical nature of scholarly pursuits.
As we venture into less conventional sources of insight, it is worth noting the unexpected revelations that may arise from unorthodox mediums. While perusing the aisles of a local grocery store, one may chance upon insightful anecdotes embedded within the printed ephemera of shopping receipts. The casual observation of patterns in butter purchases and the employment trajectory of logisticians in Utah may yield unexpectedly illuminating revelations, highlighting the serendipitous nature of scholarly investigation and the potential sources of inspiration that lie hidden in everyday encounters.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data spanning from 2004 to 2021 revealed a robust correlation between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in Utah, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9186018 and an r-squared of 0.8438293. The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship. This finding certainly raises the question: is the employment of logisticians in Utah directly influenced by the creamy delight that is butter?
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah. The pattern is as clear as the separation of cream from buttermilk, leaving little room for doubt regarding the association. The figure is reminiscent of a classic love story – the tale of butter and logisticians, a match made in statistical heaven.
The correlation uncovered in this study serves as a reminder that sometimes, the unlikeliest pairs can exhibit remarkable connections. Just as butter enlivens the flavor of a bland dish, it appears to have a palpable impact on the employment landscape for logisticians in Utah. One might say that this finding is as unexpected and delightful as stumbling upon the last pat of butter in an empty fridge – truly a rare and surprising discovery.
In conclusion, the results of this research not only unveil a distinctive bond between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah but also provide ample food for thought. The findings serve as a flavorful reminder of the intricate web of correlations that underpin labor market dynamics. As researchers continue to unravel the mysteries of the statistical universe, they may find that sometimes, the most unexpected linkages yield the most palatable insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study provide compelling evidence in support of previous research that has suggested a connection between dietary habits and employment trends. The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant relationship between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in Utah underscore the need to consider unorthodox factors in labor market analysis. As the data churns out this unexpected linkage, it becomes clear that the influence of butter consumption extends beyond the realm of culinary delight and into the employment landscape. One might jest that the labor market in Utah is truly experiencing a "butter boom."

The results of this study align with the initial explorations by Smith et al. (2015) into the unanticipated effects of dietary patterns on occupational statistics. The novel correlation between butter consumption and logistician employment in Utah, highlighted in this research, builds upon the foundation laid by previous studies, spreading its influence like butter on warm toast. It seems that the connection between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah is not just a flaky hypothesis but a substantial revelation that deserves further investigation. After all, who would have thought that the creamy goodness of butter could have such a profound impact on employment dynamics? It could be said that uncovering this correlation was a "buttery smooth" process.

Similarly, the present study corroborates the insightful work of Doe and Johnson (2018), which illuminated the potential impact of dietary habits on regional employment patterns. The findings of this research serve as a testament to the richness of exploring unorthodox influencers in labor market dynamics, affirming the consequential role of butter consumption in shaping employment trends in the state of Utah. The unexpected connection between butter and the employment of logisticians might prompt one to playfully remark that this revelation adds a whole new layer of meaning to the phrase "bringing home the butter."

In light of the unexpected nature of this correlation, it is worth reflecting on the whimsical nature of scholarly pursuits. While the link between butter consumption and logisticians in Utah may seem lighthearted at first glance, the statistical robustness of the relationship demands serious consideration. Just as a well-timed dad joke can lighten the mood, the surprising findings of this study add a touch of levity to the often serious business of empirical research. It appears that even in the most unexpected places, such as the dairy aisle, important insights can be found – truly, a "butterific" discovery.

The implications of this research extend beyond the immediate connection between butter consumption and the employment of logisticians in Utah. They call for a reevaluation of the factors that shape labor market dynamics, expanding the discourse to encompass unconventional influencers. As future studies delve deeper into the intricacies of food consumption and its ripple effects, the findings of this research serve as a reminder that sometimes, the most lip-smacking revelations emerge from the unlikeliest of sources. This unexpected correlation invites scholars to spread their investigative wings and "butter up" to the idea of exploring unforeseen connections in the vast buffet of empirical inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and The number of logisticians in Utah. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Connection: A Butterly Analysis of Butter Consumption and the Quantity of Logisticians in Utah

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study examines the perplexing relationship between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in the state of Utah, utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9186018 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2021. This research aims to butter our understanding of the unexpected ties between dietary habits and occupational statistics, churning out insights that may spread across diverse disciplines.

Upon analyzing the data, our research team discovered a positively buttered correlation between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah. The findings suggest that as butter consumption increases, the number of logisticians in the state also rises, although causation cannot be inferred from this cross-sectional analysis. As one might say, the relationship between butter consumption and logistician employment in Utah could be seen as "spreading like creamy, delicious wildfire."

This study reiterates the importance of considering unorthodox factors in examining labor market trends. The unexpected correlation opens the door to a whole new field of research, giving a whole new meaning to the phrase "adding butter to one's knowledge."

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The study of labor market trends has traditionally focused on factors such as educational attainment, economic conditions, and technological advancements. However, the exploration of the interplay between dietary habits and occupational statistics has remained relatively uncharted territory. In this study, we delve into the curious association between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in the state of Utah, aiming to churn out new insights into this unexpected correlation.
As we butter our way through the data, we aim to spread awareness of the potential impact of butter consumption on the job market. With every bite of toast and dollop of butter, could there be a subtle influence on the employment landscape for logisticians in Utah? The possibilities are as intriguing as the creamy spread itself.
The unexpected ties discovered in our analysis present a stirring reminder of the need to consider unconventional influencers in labor market dynamics. The correlation between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in Utah may be seen as a "butterfly effect" on the state's employment landscape. This unexpected connection could indeed be characterized as a "spreadsheet" of data that transcends the confines of traditional labor market analysis.
As we delve into this unexplored terrain, it becomes apparent that the relationship between butter consumption and logistician employment in Utah is more than just a statistical curiosity. It is a creamy conundrum that prompts us to rethink the boundaries of labor market research. This revelation serves as a reminder that there may be more to the ebb and flow of employment statistics than meets the eye - or the palate.
The findings of this study invite further exploration and analysis, as we strive to spread the understanding of seemingly disparate factors that may influence labor market trends. This unorthodox correlation between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah undoubtedly adds a new layer of complexity to the study of labor market dynamics and serves as a clarion call for interdisciplinary investigation.
In conclusion, the unexpected bond between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in Utah provides a rich ground for scholarly inquiry and buttery puns. It is indeed a reminder to embrace the unexpected and to be open to the spread of knowledge, even if it comes in the form of a seemingly innocuous dairy product.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data spanning from 2004 to 2021 revealed a robust correlation between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in Utah, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9186018 and an r-squared of 0.8438293. The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship. This finding certainly raises the question: is the employment of logisticians in Utah directly influenced by the creamy delight that is butter?
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah. The pattern is as clear as the separation of cream from buttermilk, leaving little room for doubt regarding the association. The figure is reminiscent of a classic love story – the tale of butter and logisticians, a match made in statistical heaven.
The correlation uncovered in this study serves as a reminder that sometimes, the unlikeliest pairs can exhibit remarkable connections. Just as butter enlivens the flavor of a bland dish, it appears to have a palpable impact on the employment landscape for logisticians in Utah. One might say that this finding is as unexpected and delightful as stumbling upon the last pat of butter in an empty fridge – truly a rare and surprising discovery.
In conclusion, the results of this research not only unveil a distinctive bond between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah but also provide ample food for thought. The findings serve as a flavorful reminder of the intricate web of correlations that underpin labor market dynamics. As researchers continue to unravel the mysteries of the statistical universe, they may find that sometimes, the most unexpected linkages yield the most palatable insights.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, the examination of butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah has churned out unexpected findings and has provided ample food for thought. The remarkably strong correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value unearthed in this analysis have spread light on a seemingly buttery relationship. This study sheds light on the potential influence of dietary factors on the labor market dynamics, providing a new layer of complexity to the field of employment statistics. It's like finding the last pat of butter in an empty fridge – truly a rare and surprising discovery.

As the data presented itself and the results were analyzed, it became increasingly clear that the relationship between butter consumption and logistician employment in Utah is more than just a spread of correlation. It is a creamy conundrum that prompts us to reconsider the boundaries of labor market research. The unexpected connection between these seemingly unrelated variables is truly a testament to the unpredictable nature of statistical analyses. It's as if the butter and logistician employment data were as inseparable as peanut butter and jelly – a match made in statistical heaven.

The unexpected bond uncovered here metaphorically spreads like creamy, delicious wildfire, leaving behind a trail of thought-provoking questions and buttery puns. It serves as a reminder to embrace the unexpected and to be open to the spread of knowledge, even if it comes in the form of a seemingly innocuous dairy product. The unexpected correlation between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah undoubtedly adds a new layer of complexity to the study of labor market dynamics and serves as a clarion call for interdisciplinary investigation.

Given the unexpected nature of these findings and the potential implications on the understanding of labor market dynamics, it is safe to say that no further research is needed in this area. The evidence presented is as convincing as a well-crafted dad joke, leaving little room for further inquiry. It's time to spread our findings to the wider academic community and butter up our understanding of the multifaceted influences on labor market trends. No more research is needed in this area; it's time to spread the word.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Spreading the Connection: A Butterly Analysis of Butter Consumption and the Quantity of Logisticians in Utah. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Culinary Statistics and Regional Demographics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Spreading the Connection: A Butterly Analysis of Butter Consumption and the Quantity of Logisticians in Utah. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Entomological Culinary Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Spreading the Connection: A Butterly Analysis of Butter Consumption and the Quantity of Logisticians in Utah with an abstract of The study examines the perplexing relationship between butter consumption and the number of logisticians in the state of Utah, utilizing data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings reveal a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9186018 and a p-value less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2021. This research aims to butter our understanding of the unexpected ties between dietary habits and occupational statistics, churning out insights that may spread across diverse disciplines.
Upon analyzing the data, our research team discovered a positively buttered correlation between butter consumption and the quantity of logisticians in Utah. The findings suggest that as butter consumption increases, the number of logisticians in the state also rises, although causation cannot be inferred from this cross-sectional analysis. As one might say, the relationship between butter consumption and logistician employment in Utah could be seen as "spreading like creamy, delicious wildfire."
This study reiterates the importance of considering unorthodox factors in examining labor market trends. The unexpected correlation opens the door to a whole new field of research, giving a whole new meaning to the phrase "adding butter to one's knowledge.

ChatGPT:

butter consumption, logisticians, Utah, USDA data, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, occupational statistics, dietary habits, labor market trends, cross-sectional analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Butter consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Butter in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Butter consumption

The number of logisticians in Utah
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of logisticians in Utah
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of logisticians in Utah

Correlation r = 0.9186018 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8438293 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of logisticians in Utah) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Butter consumption) over the 18 years from 2004 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.5E-8. 0.0000000748857562358950600000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 7.5E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 13,353,674 random variables You don't actually need 13 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Butter consumption (Pounds per person)4.54.54.74.7554.95.45.55.55.55.65.75.766.26.36.5
The number of logisticians in Utah (Logisticians)3602801350139015901470146014101540173019602060237024302510244025602980




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.5,4.5,4.7,4.7,5,5,4.9,5.4,5.5,5.5,5.5,5.6,5.7,5.7,6,6.2,6.3,6.5,])
array_2 = np.array([360,280,1350,1390,1590,1470,1460,1410,1540,1730,1960,2060,2370,2430,2510,2440,2560,2980,])
array_1_name = "Butter consumption"
array_2_name = "The number of logisticians in Utah"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 1485 · Black Variable ID: 557 · Red Variable ID: 17421
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0