about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,436 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is xkcd comics published about charts and the second variable is The number of transportation security screeners in Iowa.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The correlation is due to the fact that as the xkcd comics about charts decreased, the overall nationwide productivity of individuals working in jobs related to transportation security increased. This resulted in a surplus of transportation security screeners in Iowa, leading to a decrease in their numbers to maintain equilibrium. Remember, when it comes to Iowa’s transportation security, it’s all about that xkcd-chart comic balance!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie, depicting a stick figure standing in line at an airport security checkpoint. The stick figure is holding various items like shoes, laptops, and liquids. The chart "Number of Transportation Security Screeners in Iowa" is humorously integrated into the background, with the stick figure serving as the data points. In the background, there is a whimsical illustration of an airport security checkpoint with characters reminiscent of a Disney movie engaging in humorous interactions related to airport security measures. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: xkcd comics published about charts and The number of transportation security screeners in Iowa. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute 2D animation 3D Pixar Style Voxel art Psychedelic An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both xkcd comics published about charts and The number of transportation security screeners in Iowa together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In an xkcd comic, a chart titled "Number of Transportation Security Screeners in Iowa" is being humorously depicted. The chart is shown on a computer screen, with stick figures standing in line at the security checkpoint in an airport, representing the data points. The stick figures are holding various items like shoes, laptops, and liquids. In the background, there's a speech bubble with a humorous comment about the reliability of airport security measures.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: In an xkcd comic, a chart titled "Number of Transportation Security Screeners in Iowa" is being humorously depicted. The chart is shown on a computer screen, with stick figures standing in line at the security checkpoint in an airport, representing the data points. The stick figures are holding various items like shoes, laptops, and liquids. In the background, there's a speech bubble with a humorous comment about the reliability of airport security measures. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie, depicting a stick figure standing in line at an airport security checkpoint. The stick figure is holding various items like shoes, laptops, and liquids. The chart "Number of Transportation Security Screeners in Iowa" is humorously integrated into the background, with the stick figure serving as the data points. In the background, there is a whimsical illustration of an airport security checkpoint with characters reminiscent of a Disney movie engaging in humorous interactions related to airport security measures.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in xkcd comics published about charts caused The number of transportation security screeners in Iowa to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Comic Correlations: Connecting xkcd Charts to the Count of Cornhusker Security Screeners

The Journal of Whimsical Data Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about charts and The number of transportation security screeners in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of xkcd comics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8485670 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Comic Correlations: Connecting xkcd Charts to the Count of Cornhusker Security Screeners

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected and, quite frankly, whimsical connection between xkcd comics featuring charts and the number of transportation security screeners in Iowa. By conducting advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics and leveraging Bureau of Labor Statistics data, our research team has uncovered a statistically significant correlation between the two seemingly disparate variables.

Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8485670 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022, indicating a robust relationship between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the employment figures of security screeners in the great state of Iowa - who knew charts could have such an impact on public sector jobs? This correlation may leave one scratching their head, but as always, the data doesn't lie - or does it? Our work further suggests a potential avenue for future research into the whimsical world of data visualization and its influence on unexpected socioeconomic phenomena.

In the spirit of jest and inquiry, we pose a question: what do you call a chart that can sing and dance? A bar-t! This unexpected correlation might just keep us on our toes, much like those transportation security screeners.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about charts and The number of transportation security screeners in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Comic Correlations: Connecting xkcd Charts to the Count of Cornhusker Security Screeners

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected and, quite frankly, whimsical connection between xkcd comics featuring charts and the number of transportation security screeners in Iowa. By conducting advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics and leveraging Bureau of Labor Statistics data, our research team has uncovered a statistically significant correlation between the two seemingly disparate variables.

Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8485670 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022, indicating a robust relationship between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the employment figures of security screeners in the great state of Iowa - who knew charts could have such an impact on public sector jobs? This correlation may leave one scratching their head, but as always, the data doesn't lie - or does it? Our work further suggests a potential avenue for future research into the whimsical world of data visualization and its influence on unexpected socioeconomic phenomena.

In the spirit of jest and inquiry, we pose a question: what do you call a chart that can sing and dance? A bar-t! This unexpected correlation might just keep us on our toes, much like those transportation security screeners.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the wacky world of research, one can never predict the unexpected connections that may emerge between seemingly unrelated variables. This paper sets out to explore the quirky correlation between xkcd comics featuring charts and the count of transportation security screeners in Iowa. As we dive into the wittily drawn world of xkcd, we are reminded that sometimes truth is stranger than fiction, or at least, stranger than a statistically significant p-value.

Our study was inspired by the ongoing pursuit of uncovering hidden patterns and connections in data, and we found ourselves delving into a realm where data analysis meets humor, and where correlations may be as surprising as a dad joke at the dinner table. The fascinating interplay between the lighthearted xkcd comics and the rather serious occupation of security screening in Iowa has led us on a statistical adventure that is as unexpected as a probability distribution plotting the likelihood of encountering a rogue "statistics pun" at an academic conference.

Leveraging the power of advanced artificial intelligence and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we sought to unravel the enigma of whether there exists a meaningful relationship between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the labor force employed in the transportation security sector in Iowa. Our path to discovery was anything but linear, much like the trendline of a scatter plot trying to fit a curve to a set of data points seemingly uninterested in conforming to any established pattern.

This quest has brought us face to face with a rather intriguing question: why did the scatter plot go to therapy? Because it was having trouble fitting in! With a chuckle ensconced in the confines of academic inquiry, we aim to shed light on the unexpected correlations that can emerge when one delves into the comical yet not-so-comical world of data visualization and public sector employment. Our findings challenge the notion that there can't be humor in the halls of statistical significance, and demonstrate that the world of correlations is more varied and amusing than an economist's collection of supply and demand jokes.

Our earnest pursuit of knowledge and amusement has led us to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8485670 with a p-value of less than 0.01, which stands testament to the robustness of the relationship between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the employment figures of security screeners in Iowa. This correlation, much like a lighthearted jest in a dull conversation, may raise eyebrows and evoke a skeptical smirk, but the data speaks for itself - or does it?

As we embark on this unconventional journey of inquiry, we find ourselves pondering the whimsical nature of our findings and the potential ramifications for future research. It is in this spirit that we pose another question: why did the chi-square test break up with the z-test? Because it found their relationship was not statistically significant! Our investigation may lead us down unexpected paths, akin to the surprises encountered by the transportation security screeners in their daily endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about charts and The number of transportation security screeners in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Comic Correlations: Connecting xkcd Charts to the Count of Cornhusker Security Screeners

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected and, quite frankly, whimsical connection between xkcd comics featuring charts and the number of transportation security screeners in Iowa. By conducting advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics and leveraging Bureau of Labor Statistics data, our research team has uncovered a statistically significant correlation between the two seemingly disparate variables.

Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8485670 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022, indicating a robust relationship between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the employment figures of security screeners in the great state of Iowa - who knew charts could have such an impact on public sector jobs? This correlation may leave one scratching their head, but as always, the data doesn't lie - or does it? Our work further suggests a potential avenue for future research into the whimsical world of data visualization and its influence on unexpected socioeconomic phenomena.

In the spirit of jest and inquiry, we pose a question: what do you call a chart that can sing and dance? A bar-t! This unexpected correlation might just keep us on our toes, much like those transportation security screeners.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the wacky world of research, one can never predict the unexpected connections that may emerge between seemingly unrelated variables. This paper sets out to explore the quirky correlation between xkcd comics featuring charts and the count of transportation security screeners in Iowa. As we dive into the wittily drawn world of xkcd, we are reminded that sometimes truth is stranger than fiction, or at least, stranger than a statistically significant p-value.
Our study was inspired by the ongoing pursuit of uncovering hidden patterns and connections in data, and we found ourselves delving into a realm where data analysis meets humor, and where correlations may be as surprising as a dad joke at the dinner table. The fascinating interplay between the lighthearted xkcd comics and the rather serious occupation of security screening in Iowa has led us on a statistical adventure that is as unexpected as a probability distribution plotting the likelihood of encountering a rogue "statistics pun" at an academic conference.
Leveraging the power of advanced artificial intelligence and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we sought to unravel the enigma of whether there exists a meaningful relationship between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the labor force employed in the transportation security sector in Iowa. Our path to discovery was anything but linear, much like the trendline of a scatter plot trying to fit a curve to a set of data points seemingly uninterested in conforming to any established pattern.
This quest has brought us face to face with a rather intriguing question: why did the scatter plot go to therapy? Because it was having trouble fitting in! With a chuckle ensconced in the confines of academic inquiry, we aim to shed light on the unexpected correlations that can emerge when one delves into the comical yet not-so-comical world of data visualization and public sector employment. Our findings challenge the notion that there can't be humor in the halls of statistical significance, and demonstrate that the world of correlations is more varied and amusing than an economist's collection of supply and demand jokes.
Our earnest pursuit of knowledge and amusement has led us to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8485670 with a p-value of less than 0.01, which stands testament to the robustness of the relationship between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the employment figures of security screeners in Iowa. This correlation, much like a lighthearted jest in a dull conversation, may raise eyebrows and evoke a skeptical smirk, but the data speaks for itself - or does it?
As we embark on this unconventional journey of inquiry, we find ourselves pondering the whimsical nature of our findings and the potential ramifications for future research. It is in this spirit that we pose another question: why did the chi-square test break up with the z-test? Because it found their relationship was not statistically significant! Our investigation may lead us down unexpected paths, akin to the surprises encountered by the transportation security screeners in their daily endeavors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Art of Charts" by Smith, the authors find a comprehensive exploration of the visual representation of data and its impact on the perception of information. This important work lays the foundation for our understanding of the power that charts hold in shaping not only our understanding but also, apparently, the employment levels of transportation security screeners in Iowa. It seems that the influence of charts extends beyond mere visual aids and into the realm of economic indicators, much like a pie chart that finds itself moonlighting as a colorful dessert dish.

Doe, in "The Statistical Universe: Unraveling Patterns in the Chaos," elucidates the intricate web of statistical relationships and interconnections that weaves through diverse phenomena. Their work highlights the unexpected correlations that can emerge, not unlike stumbling upon a surprising punchline in the midst of a complex statistical discussion. Our findings serve as a testament to the captivating nature of statistical relationships – who would have thought that xkcd comics would have such a profound influence on the labor market in Iowa?

Jones in "Data Oddities and Statistical Wonders" explores the peculiar anomalies that often defy conventional statistical reasoning. Little did we know that the depiction of scatter plots and bar graphs in xkcd comics could have a tangible impact on the livelihood of security screeners. This work serves as a reminder that in the world of data, one must always be prepared for unexpected twists and turns - much like the sudden appearance of a dad joke at a serious academic conference.

Turning to works of fiction that seemingly bear relevance to our study, we pivot to "The Importance of Being Earnest" by Oscar Wilde. Although not inherently tied to statistical analyses, the thematic exploration of alter egos and hidden identities speaks to the surprising nature of correlations that we have uncovered. Our findings emphasize the unexpected hidden relationships between seemingly disparate elements, much like the unexpected twists and turns of a classic Oscar Wilde play.

Continuing our exploration, "Catch-22" by Joseph Heller provides a unique perspective on the absurdities of bureaucracy and the unpredictability of outcomes. In a similar vein, our research has unraveled a peculiar correlation that seems to defy traditional logic and may leave one feeling as bewildered as the characters in Heller's novel. It seems that the world of correlations is as perplexing and paradoxical as navigating bureaucratic mazes, much like trying to decipher a particularly convoluted line graph.

In the interest of comprehensive literature review, it is worth noting that our foray into researching this correlation extended to unorthodox sources, including an analysis of sales receipts from various retail establishments and the musings of conspiracy theorists who believe that comic artists hold the key to unlocking enigmatic truths. Our thorough examination of disparate sources speaks to the breadth and depth of our investigation, much like a surprisingly lengthy CVS receipt that seems to hold an unexpected wealth of information.

In conclusion, our literature review showcases the unexpected yet fascinating nature of our findings, shedding light on the whimsical connections between xkcd comics and the count of transportation security screeners in Iowa. These unexpected correlations highlight the inherently quirky and unpredictable nature of statistical relationships, reminding us that sometimes, truth can be stranger than fiction – and statistical significance can be wackier than a dad joke at a research symposium.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about charts and The number of transportation security screeners in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of xkcd comics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Comic Correlations: Connecting xkcd Charts to the Count of Cornhusker Security Screeners

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected and, quite frankly, whimsical connection between xkcd comics featuring charts and the number of transportation security screeners in Iowa. By conducting advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics and leveraging Bureau of Labor Statistics data, our research team has uncovered a statistically significant correlation between the two seemingly disparate variables.

Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8485670 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022, indicating a robust relationship between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the employment figures of security screeners in the great state of Iowa - who knew charts could have such an impact on public sector jobs? This correlation may leave one scratching their head, but as always, the data doesn't lie - or does it? Our work further suggests a potential avenue for future research into the whimsical world of data visualization and its influence on unexpected socioeconomic phenomena.

In the spirit of jest and inquiry, we pose a question: what do you call a chart that can sing and dance? A bar-t! This unexpected correlation might just keep us on our toes, much like those transportation security screeners.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the wacky world of research, one can never predict the unexpected connections that may emerge between seemingly unrelated variables. This paper sets out to explore the quirky correlation between xkcd comics featuring charts and the count of transportation security screeners in Iowa. As we dive into the wittily drawn world of xkcd, we are reminded that sometimes truth is stranger than fiction, or at least, stranger than a statistically significant p-value.
Our study was inspired by the ongoing pursuit of uncovering hidden patterns and connections in data, and we found ourselves delving into a realm where data analysis meets humor, and where correlations may be as surprising as a dad joke at the dinner table. The fascinating interplay between the lighthearted xkcd comics and the rather serious occupation of security screening in Iowa has led us on a statistical adventure that is as unexpected as a probability distribution plotting the likelihood of encountering a rogue "statistics pun" at an academic conference.
Leveraging the power of advanced artificial intelligence and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we sought to unravel the enigma of whether there exists a meaningful relationship between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the labor force employed in the transportation security sector in Iowa. Our path to discovery was anything but linear, much like the trendline of a scatter plot trying to fit a curve to a set of data points seemingly uninterested in conforming to any established pattern.
This quest has brought us face to face with a rather intriguing question: why did the scatter plot go to therapy? Because it was having trouble fitting in! With a chuckle ensconced in the confines of academic inquiry, we aim to shed light on the unexpected correlations that can emerge when one delves into the comical yet not-so-comical world of data visualization and public sector employment. Our findings challenge the notion that there can't be humor in the halls of statistical significance, and demonstrate that the world of correlations is more varied and amusing than an economist's collection of supply and demand jokes.
Our earnest pursuit of knowledge and amusement has led us to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8485670 with a p-value of less than 0.01, which stands testament to the robustness of the relationship between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the employment figures of security screeners in Iowa. This correlation, much like a lighthearted jest in a dull conversation, may raise eyebrows and evoke a skeptical smirk, but the data speaks for itself - or does it?
As we embark on this unconventional journey of inquiry, we find ourselves pondering the whimsical nature of our findings and the potential ramifications for future research. It is in this spirit that we pose another question: why did the chi-square test break up with the z-test? Because it found their relationship was not statistically significant! Our investigation may lead us down unexpected paths, akin to the surprises encountered by the transportation security screeners in their daily endeavors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this investigation involved a multi-faceted approach aimed at uncovering and analyzing the connection between xkcd comics featuring charts and the count of transportation security screeners in Iowa. Drawing from the rich tapestry of online data, our research team applied a combination of advanced artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms and Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) information to undertake the intricate task of data collection and analysis. This process was as meticulous as a statistician checking and re-checking their calculations - after all, when dealing with the whimsical world of xkcd and employment figures, one can never be too careful.

To begin with, we engaged in a comprehensive search of xkcd comics published between 2012 and 2022, focusing specifically on those that portrayed charts in their humor-laden illustrations. Our AI algorithms were programmed to not only identify and categorize these comics but also to extract relevant visual and textual data pertaining to the depicted charts and their context within each comic. The complexity of this process was akin to navigating through a scatter plot with multiple outliers - it required precision, thoroughness, and a keen eye for patterns hidden within the visual narrative.

Once the xkcd comics data was meticulously cataloged, we turned our attention to the BLS database, where we extracted and compiled employment statistics for transportation security screeners in Iowa over the same timespan. This phase of the methodology involved navigating the labyrinthine corridors of occupational data, much like a determined explorer charting a course through uncharted territory - albeit with the aid of powerful statistical software and the occasional cup of coffee to fuel our endeavors.

The next stage of our methodology involved the application of advanced statistical techniques to analyze the collected xkcd comics and BLS employment data. Our approach integrated regression analysis, time series modeling, and cross-correlation methods to discern potential relationships and patterns between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the count of transportation security screeners in Iowa. This process required a level of statistical acumen and creativity worthy of a Nobel laureate in the field of whimsical correlations - a nod to the playful nature of our research focus.

Throughout the methodology, we maintained a steadfast commitment to rigor and attention to detail, ensuring that our analysis of the xkcd comics and employment figures met the highest standards of statistical validity. This dedication was as unwavering as a statistically significant p-value, and it reflected our earnest pursuit of uncovering meaningful insights amid the seemingly lighthearted world of comic-inspired data correlations.

In a punny tribute to our research journey, we present the following analogy: embarking on this investigation was like trying to fit a polynomial regression to a dataset with a sense of humor - it required patience, adaptability, and the occasional nod to the unexpected.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about charts and The number of transportation security screeners in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of xkcd comics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8485670, r-squared of 0.7200659, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Comic Correlations: Connecting xkcd Charts to the Count of Cornhusker Security Screeners

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected and, quite frankly, whimsical connection between xkcd comics featuring charts and the number of transportation security screeners in Iowa. By conducting advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics and leveraging Bureau of Labor Statistics data, our research team has uncovered a statistically significant correlation between the two seemingly disparate variables.

Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8485670 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022, indicating a robust relationship between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the employment figures of security screeners in the great state of Iowa - who knew charts could have such an impact on public sector jobs? This correlation may leave one scratching their head, but as always, the data doesn't lie - or does it? Our work further suggests a potential avenue for future research into the whimsical world of data visualization and its influence on unexpected socioeconomic phenomena.

In the spirit of jest and inquiry, we pose a question: what do you call a chart that can sing and dance? A bar-t! This unexpected correlation might just keep us on our toes, much like those transportation security screeners.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the wacky world of research, one can never predict the unexpected connections that may emerge between seemingly unrelated variables. This paper sets out to explore the quirky correlation between xkcd comics featuring charts and the count of transportation security screeners in Iowa. As we dive into the wittily drawn world of xkcd, we are reminded that sometimes truth is stranger than fiction, or at least, stranger than a statistically significant p-value.
Our study was inspired by the ongoing pursuit of uncovering hidden patterns and connections in data, and we found ourselves delving into a realm where data analysis meets humor, and where correlations may be as surprising as a dad joke at the dinner table. The fascinating interplay between the lighthearted xkcd comics and the rather serious occupation of security screening in Iowa has led us on a statistical adventure that is as unexpected as a probability distribution plotting the likelihood of encountering a rogue "statistics pun" at an academic conference.
Leveraging the power of advanced artificial intelligence and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we sought to unravel the enigma of whether there exists a meaningful relationship between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the labor force employed in the transportation security sector in Iowa. Our path to discovery was anything but linear, much like the trendline of a scatter plot trying to fit a curve to a set of data points seemingly uninterested in conforming to any established pattern.
This quest has brought us face to face with a rather intriguing question: why did the scatter plot go to therapy? Because it was having trouble fitting in! With a chuckle ensconced in the confines of academic inquiry, we aim to shed light on the unexpected correlations that can emerge when one delves into the comical yet not-so-comical world of data visualization and public sector employment. Our findings challenge the notion that there can't be humor in the halls of statistical significance, and demonstrate that the world of correlations is more varied and amusing than an economist's collection of supply and demand jokes.
Our earnest pursuit of knowledge and amusement has led us to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8485670 with a p-value of less than 0.01, which stands testament to the robustness of the relationship between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the employment figures of security screeners in Iowa. This correlation, much like a lighthearted jest in a dull conversation, may raise eyebrows and evoke a skeptical smirk, but the data speaks for itself - or does it?
As we embark on this unconventional journey of inquiry, we find ourselves pondering the whimsical nature of our findings and the potential ramifications for future research. It is in this spirit that we pose another question: why did the chi-square test break up with the z-test? Because it found their relationship was not statistically significant! Our investigation may lead us down unexpected paths, akin to the surprises encountered by the transportation security screeners in their daily endeavors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the correlation between xkcd comics featuring charts and the number of transportation security screeners in Iowa reveal a strong and statistically significant relationship. Our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8485670, indicating a substantial positive correlation between the two variables. This finding suggests that the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics has a notable influence on the employment figures of security screeners in Iowa, leaving us to ponder, is it the power of visual storytelling or merely the manifestation of statistical humor?

Akin to a clever pun, our findings may leave one with a wry smile, but they stand firm in the face of statistical scrutiny. The r-squared value of 0.7200659 further reinforces the strength of the relationship, suggesting that approximately 72% of the variability in the count of transportation security screeners in Iowa can be explained by the depiction of charts in xkcd comics. In the realm of statistics, such a strong relationship is certainly nothing to joke about!

Furthermore, our analysis yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the statistical significance of the observed correlation. This p-value provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, reinforcing the veracity of the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It appears that the comic strips and employment figures have more in common than one might initially surmise, much like a surprising punchline to an inconspicuous statistical inquiry.

Our thought-provoking findings are succinctly captured in Figure 1, which displays a compelling scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the count of transportation security screeners in Iowa. The graph visually encapsulates the unexpected connection we have unveiled, much like a clever punchline that brings together two disparate elements into a coherent and comical whole.

In the spirit of scientific inquiry and whimsy, we are left to contemplate the profound implications of our findings, leading us to ponder another dad joke: what did the statistician say when asked about a potential lurking variable? It's always the one you least expect! Our research opens new avenues for the exploration of the interplay between visual humor and public sector employment trends, challenging conventional wisdom and inviting further investigation into the capricious nature of correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about charts and The number of transportation security screeners in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Comic Correlations: Connecting xkcd Charts to the Count of Cornhusker Security Screeners

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected and, quite frankly, whimsical connection between xkcd comics featuring charts and the number of transportation security screeners in Iowa. By conducting advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics and leveraging Bureau of Labor Statistics data, our research team has uncovered a statistically significant correlation between the two seemingly disparate variables.

Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8485670 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022, indicating a robust relationship between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the employment figures of security screeners in the great state of Iowa - who knew charts could have such an impact on public sector jobs? This correlation may leave one scratching their head, but as always, the data doesn't lie - or does it? Our work further suggests a potential avenue for future research into the whimsical world of data visualization and its influence on unexpected socioeconomic phenomena.

In the spirit of jest and inquiry, we pose a question: what do you call a chart that can sing and dance? A bar-t! This unexpected correlation might just keep us on our toes, much like those transportation security screeners.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Art of Charts" by Smith, the authors find a comprehensive exploration of the visual representation of data and its impact on the perception of information. This important work lays the foundation for our understanding of the power that charts hold in shaping not only our understanding but also, apparently, the employment levels of transportation security screeners in Iowa. It seems that the influence of charts extends beyond mere visual aids and into the realm of economic indicators, much like a pie chart that finds itself moonlighting as a colorful dessert dish.
Doe, in "The Statistical Universe: Unraveling Patterns in the Chaos," elucidates the intricate web of statistical relationships and interconnections that weaves through diverse phenomena. Their work highlights the unexpected correlations that can emerge, not unlike stumbling upon a surprising punchline in the midst of a complex statistical discussion. Our findings serve as a testament to the captivating nature of statistical relationships – who would have thought that xkcd comics would have such a profound influence on the labor market in Iowa?
Jones in "Data Oddities and Statistical Wonders" explores the peculiar anomalies that often defy conventional statistical reasoning. Little did we know that the depiction of scatter plots and bar graphs in xkcd comics could have a tangible impact on the livelihood of security screeners. This work serves as a reminder that in the world of data, one must always be prepared for unexpected twists and turns - much like the sudden appearance of a dad joke at a serious academic conference.
Turning to works of fiction that seemingly bear relevance to our study, we pivot to "The Importance of Being Earnest" by Oscar Wilde. Although not inherently tied to statistical analyses, the thematic exploration of alter egos and hidden identities speaks to the surprising nature of correlations that we have uncovered. Our findings emphasize the unexpected hidden relationships between seemingly disparate elements, much like the unexpected twists and turns of a classic Oscar Wilde play.
Continuing our exploration, "Catch-22" by Joseph Heller provides a unique perspective on the absurdities of bureaucracy and the unpredictability of outcomes. In a similar vein, our research has unraveled a peculiar correlation that seems to defy traditional logic and may leave one feeling as bewildered as the characters in Heller's novel. It seems that the world of correlations is as perplexing and paradoxical as navigating bureaucratic mazes, much like trying to decipher a particularly convoluted line graph.
In the interest of comprehensive literature review, it is worth noting that our foray into researching this correlation extended to unorthodox sources, including an analysis of sales receipts from various retail establishments and the musings of conspiracy theorists who believe that comic artists hold the key to unlocking enigmatic truths. Our thorough examination of disparate sources speaks to the breadth and depth of our investigation, much like a surprisingly lengthy CVS receipt that seems to hold an unexpected wealth of information.
In conclusion, our literature review showcases the unexpected yet fascinating nature of our findings, shedding light on the whimsical connections between xkcd comics and the count of transportation security screeners in Iowa. These unexpected correlations highlight the inherently quirky and unpredictable nature of statistical relationships, reminding us that sometimes, truth can be stranger than fiction – and statistical significance can be wackier than a dad joke at a research symposium.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between xkcd comics featuring charts and the number of transportation security screeners in Iowa reveal a strong and statistically significant relationship. Our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8485670, indicating a substantial positive correlation between the two variables. This finding suggests that the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics has a notable influence on the employment figures of security screeners in Iowa, leaving us to ponder, is it the power of visual storytelling or merely the manifestation of statistical humor?
Akin to a clever pun, our findings may leave one with a wry smile, but they stand firm in the face of statistical scrutiny. The r-squared value of 0.7200659 further reinforces the strength of the relationship, suggesting that approximately 72% of the variability in the count of transportation security screeners in Iowa can be explained by the depiction of charts in xkcd comics. In the realm of statistics, such a strong relationship is certainly nothing to joke about!
Furthermore, our analysis yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the statistical significance of the observed correlation. This p-value provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, reinforcing the veracity of the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It appears that the comic strips and employment figures have more in common than one might initially surmise, much like a surprising punchline to an inconspicuous statistical inquiry.
Our thought-provoking findings are succinctly captured in Figure 1, which displays a compelling scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the count of transportation security screeners in Iowa. The graph visually encapsulates the unexpected connection we have unveiled, much like a clever punchline that brings together two disparate elements into a coherent and comical whole.
In the spirit of scientific inquiry and whimsy, we are left to contemplate the profound implications of our findings, leading us to ponder another dad joke: what did the statistician say when asked about a potential lurking variable? It's always the one you least expect! Our research opens new avenues for the exploration of the interplay between visual humor and public sector employment trends, challenging conventional wisdom and inviting further investigation into the capricious nature of correlations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has brought to light an unexpected and, dare I say, whimsical correlation between xkcd comics featuring charts and the number of transportation security screeners in Iowa. By building upon the seminal works in the area of data visualization and statistical relationships, we have not only validated but also extended the existing body of knowledge in this quirky realm of inquiry.

The significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.8485670 we uncovered underscores the substantial influence of chart portrayal in xkcd comics on the employment figures of security screeners in the great state of Iowa. This finding is as surprising as coming across a statistical outlier at a tea party - it certainly piques one's interest and raises an eyebrow or two.

Our results support the earlier work of Smith, who emphasized the impact of visual representation on the perception of information. It seems that the power of charts extends beyond their utility in data presentation to exert a tangible impact on the labor market in a manner akin to a line graph plotting its own course through the economic landscape.

Furthermore, the robustness of our discovered relationships finds resonance in the insights of Doe, who delved into the intricate tapestry of statistical interconnections. Just as our results reveal a web of correlations reminiscent of a statistical sleuth unraveling a perplexing mystery, our findings emphasize the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena – a statistical story with an unexpected twist indeed.

In addition, our unexpected discoveries align with Jones's exploration of peculiar anomalies in statistical reasoning. It seems that our work serves as an ode to the peculiar anomalies that can emerge from statistical inquiries, akin to a scatter plot that leads us down an unforeseen path to unlikely conclusions.

Much like a pie chart that inadvertently serves as a colorful dessert dish, our findings have revealed a slice of statistical humor that seems to have an uncanny impact on public sector employment trends. Our investigation expands the understanding of statistical relationships and their comic potential in ways that tickle the funny bone and stimulate further inquiry into the capricious nature of correlations.

In summary, our results provide meaningful support for the prior research and extend the understanding of the whimsical and unanticipated connections between xkcd comics and the count of transportation security screeners in Iowa. They highlight the captivating and unpredictable nature of statistical relationships that can leave one chuckling with bemusement, much like encountering a particularly witty dad joke at a scientific conference.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about charts and The number of transportation security screeners in Iowa. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Comic Correlations: Connecting xkcd Charts to the Count of Cornhusker Security Screeners

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the unexpected and, quite frankly, whimsical connection between xkcd comics featuring charts and the number of transportation security screeners in Iowa. By conducting advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics and leveraging Bureau of Labor Statistics data, our research team has uncovered a statistically significant correlation between the two seemingly disparate variables.

Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8485670 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022, indicating a robust relationship between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the employment figures of security screeners in the great state of Iowa - who knew charts could have such an impact on public sector jobs? This correlation may leave one scratching their head, but as always, the data doesn't lie - or does it? Our work further suggests a potential avenue for future research into the whimsical world of data visualization and its influence on unexpected socioeconomic phenomena.

In the spirit of jest and inquiry, we pose a question: what do you call a chart that can sing and dance? A bar-t! This unexpected correlation might just keep us on our toes, much like those transportation security screeners.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the wacky world of research, one can never predict the unexpected connections that may emerge between seemingly unrelated variables. This paper sets out to explore the quirky correlation between xkcd comics featuring charts and the count of transportation security screeners in Iowa. As we dive into the wittily drawn world of xkcd, we are reminded that sometimes truth is stranger than fiction, or at least, stranger than a statistically significant p-value.
Our study was inspired by the ongoing pursuit of uncovering hidden patterns and connections in data, and we found ourselves delving into a realm where data analysis meets humor, and where correlations may be as surprising as a dad joke at the dinner table. The fascinating interplay between the lighthearted xkcd comics and the rather serious occupation of security screening in Iowa has led us on a statistical adventure that is as unexpected as a probability distribution plotting the likelihood of encountering a rogue "statistics pun" at an academic conference.
Leveraging the power of advanced artificial intelligence and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, we sought to unravel the enigma of whether there exists a meaningful relationship between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the labor force employed in the transportation security sector in Iowa. Our path to discovery was anything but linear, much like the trendline of a scatter plot trying to fit a curve to a set of data points seemingly uninterested in conforming to any established pattern.
This quest has brought us face to face with a rather intriguing question: why did the scatter plot go to therapy? Because it was having trouble fitting in! With a chuckle ensconced in the confines of academic inquiry, we aim to shed light on the unexpected correlations that can emerge when one delves into the comical yet not-so-comical world of data visualization and public sector employment. Our findings challenge the notion that there can't be humor in the halls of statistical significance, and demonstrate that the world of correlations is more varied and amusing than an economist's collection of supply and demand jokes.
Our earnest pursuit of knowledge and amusement has led us to uncover a correlation coefficient of 0.8485670 with a p-value of less than 0.01, which stands testament to the robustness of the relationship between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the employment figures of security screeners in Iowa. This correlation, much like a lighthearted jest in a dull conversation, may raise eyebrows and evoke a skeptical smirk, but the data speaks for itself - or does it?
As we embark on this unconventional journey of inquiry, we find ourselves pondering the whimsical nature of our findings and the potential ramifications for future research. It is in this spirit that we pose another question: why did the chi-square test break up with the z-test? Because it found their relationship was not statistically significant! Our investigation may lead us down unexpected paths, akin to the surprises encountered by the transportation security screeners in their daily endeavors.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between xkcd comics featuring charts and the number of transportation security screeners in Iowa reveal a strong and statistically significant relationship. Our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8485670, indicating a substantial positive correlation between the two variables. This finding suggests that the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics has a notable influence on the employment figures of security screeners in Iowa, leaving us to ponder, is it the power of visual storytelling or merely the manifestation of statistical humor?
Akin to a clever pun, our findings may leave one with a wry smile, but they stand firm in the face of statistical scrutiny. The r-squared value of 0.7200659 further reinforces the strength of the relationship, suggesting that approximately 72% of the variability in the count of transportation security screeners in Iowa can be explained by the depiction of charts in xkcd comics. In the realm of statistics, such a strong relationship is certainly nothing to joke about!
Furthermore, our analysis yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, underscoring the statistical significance of the observed correlation. This p-value provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis, reinforcing the veracity of the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It appears that the comic strips and employment figures have more in common than one might initially surmise, much like a surprising punchline to an inconspicuous statistical inquiry.
Our thought-provoking findings are succinctly captured in Figure 1, which displays a compelling scatterplot illustrating the robust correlation between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the count of transportation security screeners in Iowa. The graph visually encapsulates the unexpected connection we have unveiled, much like a clever punchline that brings together two disparate elements into a coherent and comical whole.
In the spirit of scientific inquiry and whimsy, we are left to contemplate the profound implications of our findings, leading us to ponder another dad joke: what did the statistician say when asked about a potential lurking variable? It's always the one you least expect! Our research opens new avenues for the exploration of the interplay between visual humor and public sector employment trends, challenging conventional wisdom and inviting further investigation into the capricious nature of correlations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unraveled a surprising and statistically significant correlation between xkcd comics featuring charts and the number of transportation security screeners in Iowa. The robust relationship we discovered, much like a well-crafted punchline, underscores the unexpected and whimsical connections that can emerge when exploring the world of data visualization and public sector employment trends. Our findings challenge preconceived notions and demonstrate the lighthearted yet substantial influence of visual storytelling on socioeconomic phenomena.

It could be said that our results are quite remarkable, much like finding a statistically significant relationship at a research convention. However, we must acknowledge the limitations of our study, including the potential influence of confounding variables, such as the unpredictability of public interest in intricate charts and the fluctuating demand for air travel security. But in the world of statistics, as in life, there's always a degree of uncertainty – much like trying to predict the punchline of a complex statistical model.

While our research sheds light on the fascinating interplay between xkcd comics and public sector employment in Iowa, it also raises intriguing questions for future inquiry, akin to pondering the trendline of a data set with an unexpected outlier. The unexpected correlation we uncovered, much like a perfectly timed dad joke, underscores the capricious nature of statistical relationships and the potential for unanticipated discoveries when least expected.

In the end, our findings serve as a testament to the whimsical and sometimes surprising intersections within the world of research. After all, who knew that xkcd comics and transportation security screeners in Iowa would make such unlikely bedfellows, much like a surprising plot twist in a statistical analysis? Therefore, in the spirit of inquiry and humor, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as we have unearthed the pinnacle of statistics-meets-comic correlation - but the comic relief will live on in our data for years to come!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Comic Correlations: Connecting xkcd Charts to the Count of Cornhusker Security Screeners. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Whimsical Data Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Comic Correlations: Connecting xkcd Charts to the Count of Cornhusker Security Screeners. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Silly Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Comic Correlations: Connecting xkcd Charts to the Count of Cornhusker Security Screeners with an abstract of This paper delves into the unexpected and, quite frankly, whimsical connection between xkcd comics featuring charts and the number of transportation security screeners in Iowa. By conducting advanced AI analysis of xkcd comics and leveraging Bureau of Labor Statistics data, our research team has uncovered a statistically significant correlation between the two seemingly disparate variables.
Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8485670 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2022, indicating a robust relationship between the portrayal of charts in xkcd comics and the employment figures of security screeners in the great state of Iowa - who knew charts could have such an impact on public sector jobs? This correlation may leave one scratching their head, but as always, the data doesn't lie - or does it? Our work further suggests a potential avenue for future research into the whimsical world of data visualization and its influence on unexpected socioeconomic phenomena.
In the spirit of jest and inquiry, we pose a question: what do you call a chart that can sing and dance? A bar-t! This unexpected correlation might just keep us on our toes, much like those transportation security screeners.

ChatGPT:

xkcd comics, charts, transportation security screeners, Iowa, correlation analysis, AI analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, data visualization, socioeconomic impact

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

xkcd comics published about charts
Detailed data title: The number of xkcd comics published each year about charts
Source: AI analysis of xkcd comics
Additional Info: I designed a Python workflow to perform OCR on every xkcd comic, feed that text into a large language model, and ask the model whether this comic was about the category named in the title.

See what else correlates with xkcd comics published about charts

The number of transportation security screeners in Iowa
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of transportation security screeners in Iowa
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of transportation security screeners in Iowa

Correlation r = 0.8485670 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7200659 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 72% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of transportation security screeners in Iowa) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., xkcd comics published about charts) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00096. 0.0009582602233164958000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 0.096% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,044 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.51, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
xkcd comics published about charts (xkcd comics)893445961392
The number of transportation security screeners in Iowa (Laborers)210220170170170170210210220190170




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([8,9,3,4,4,5,9,6,13,9,2,])
array_2 = np.array([210,220,170,170,170,170,210,210,220,190,170,])
array_1_name = "xkcd comics published about charts"
array_2_name = "The number of transportation security screeners in Iowa"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 1436 · Black Variable ID: 20024 · Red Variable ID: 19083
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0