about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,418 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Butter consumption and the second variable is Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released.  The chart goes from 1998 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As butter consumption increased, so did the demand for movie snacks. This led to higher sales of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films, prompting the production company to release more films to meet the butter-driven demand. It's a slippery slope of snack-inspired entertainment!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image in the style of a 1960s comic book illustration, with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern, depicting a family sitting around a cozy fireplace. The family is enjoying freshly baked bread with generous spreads of creamy butter while watching a marathon of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films on a lazy Sunday afternoon. Capture the warmth and comfort of the scene, and ensure the comic-book-style illustration enhances the coziness and retro feel. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Butter consumption and Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic Woodblock painting Parallax art Pop art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Butter consumption and Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A family sitting around a cozy fireplace, enjoying freshly baked bread with generous spreads of creamy butter, while watching a marathon of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films on a lazy Sunday afternoon.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: A family sitting around a cozy fireplace, enjoying freshly baked bread with generous spreads of creamy butter, while watching a marathon of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films on a lazy Sunday afternoon. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image in the style of a 1960s comic book illustration, with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern, depicting a family sitting around a cozy fireplace. The family is enjoying freshly baked bread with generous spreads of creamy butter while watching a marathon of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films on a lazy Sunday afternoon. Capture the warmth and comfort of the scene, and ensure the comic-book-style illustration enhances the coziness and retro feel.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Butter consumption caused Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Butter Effect: A Spread of Cinematic Proportions

The Journal of Culinary Cinema Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and IMDB to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6467151 and p < 0.01 for 1998 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Butter Effect: A Spread of Cinematic Proportions

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the curious relationship between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. By analyzing extensive data from the USDA and IMDB, we sought to uncover whether these two seemingly unrelated elements could be linked. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6467151 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1998 to 2021, illuminating a buttery connection that is of cinematic proportions.

While one might think this association is as illogical as a dairy-loving detective, our results suggest otherwise. This intriguing correlation, like a mystery in a Scooby-Doo film, may leave one scratching their head, but it cannot be ignored. The butter effect on the release of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films presents a new avenue for further exploration and encourages us to consider the impact of unexpected variables on pop culture phenomena. So, the next time you enjoy some butter on your toast, remember that it might just be influencing the Scooby-Doo universe!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Butter Effect: A Spread of Cinematic Proportions

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the curious relationship between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. By analyzing extensive data from the USDA and IMDB, we sought to uncover whether these two seemingly unrelated elements could be linked. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6467151 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1998 to 2021, illuminating a buttery connection that is of cinematic proportions.

While one might think this association is as illogical as a dairy-loving detective, our results suggest otherwise. This intriguing correlation, like a mystery in a Scooby-Doo film, may leave one scratching their head, but it cannot be ignored. The butter effect on the release of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films presents a new avenue for further exploration and encourages us to consider the impact of unexpected variables on pop culture phenomena. So, the next time you enjoy some butter on your toast, remember that it might just be influencing the Scooby-Doo universe!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

It is often said that "butter makes everything better," but could it also be making everything more cinematic? That's the tantalizing question we sought to answer in this research study. As curious as Shaggy and Scooby-Doo stumbling upon a mysterious snack, we embarked on a journey to investigate the peculiar relationship between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. It's a partnership that's as unexpected as a surprise reveal in a Scooby-Doo mystery, but our findings promise to shed light on this buttery enigma.

Before delving into the suspenseful findings, it's important to acknowledge the seemingly unconventional nature of our investigation. One might even say it's as unconventional as solving a mystery in a haunted mansion with a gang of meddling kids. Nevertheless, as researchers, we could not resist the temptation to explore this comical yet thought-provoking phenomenon. Just like Scooby and the gang following the trail of clues, we set out to uncover the truth behind this unlikely connection, armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism.

The idea of examining the relationship between butter consumption and the release of direct-to-video Scooby-Doo films might initially elicit a chuckle, but as our research progressed, we discovered that this correlation is no laughing matter. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6467151 and a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings unveiled a connection that is as striking as Velma's knack for solving mysteries. It seems that the butter effect is not just a spread for your morning toast; it may very well be spreading into the realms of animated cinema.

At this juncture, you might be wondering if this correlation is as flimsy as Scooby-Doo's attempt at disguising himself, but our results suggest otherwise. This whimsical yet intriguing association, much like a well-crafted Scooby-Doo plot twist, demands further investigation and contemplation. So, as we embark on this buttery journey through the world of mystery-solving animated sleuths, let's not overlook the potential impact of seemingly unrelated variables on our beloved pop culture phenomena. After all, as any good researcher knows, it's important to consider all possibilities, no matter how surprising they may seem.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Butter Effect: A Spread of Cinematic Proportions

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the curious relationship between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. By analyzing extensive data from the USDA and IMDB, we sought to uncover whether these two seemingly unrelated elements could be linked. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6467151 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1998 to 2021, illuminating a buttery connection that is of cinematic proportions.

While one might think this association is as illogical as a dairy-loving detective, our results suggest otherwise. This intriguing correlation, like a mystery in a Scooby-Doo film, may leave one scratching their head, but it cannot be ignored. The butter effect on the release of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films presents a new avenue for further exploration and encourages us to consider the impact of unexpected variables on pop culture phenomena. So, the next time you enjoy some butter on your toast, remember that it might just be influencing the Scooby-Doo universe!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
It is often said that "butter makes everything better," but could it also be making everything more cinematic? That's the tantalizing question we sought to answer in this research study. As curious as Shaggy and Scooby-Doo stumbling upon a mysterious snack, we embarked on a journey to investigate the peculiar relationship between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. It's a partnership that's as unexpected as a surprise reveal in a Scooby-Doo mystery, but our findings promise to shed light on this buttery enigma.
Before delving into the suspenseful findings, it's important to acknowledge the seemingly unconventional nature of our investigation. One might even say it's as unconventional as solving a mystery in a haunted mansion with a gang of meddling kids. Nevertheless, as researchers, we could not resist the temptation to explore this comical yet thought-provoking phenomenon. Just like Scooby and the gang following the trail of clues, we set out to uncover the truth behind this unlikely connection, armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism.
The idea of examining the relationship between butter consumption and the release of direct-to-video Scooby-Doo films might initially elicit a chuckle, but as our research progressed, we discovered that this correlation is no laughing matter. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6467151 and a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings unveiled a connection that is as striking as Velma's knack for solving mysteries. It seems that the butter effect is not just a spread for your morning toast; it may very well be spreading into the realms of animated cinema.
At this juncture, you might be wondering if this correlation is as flimsy as Scooby-Doo's attempt at disguising himself, but our results suggest otherwise. This whimsical yet intriguing association, much like a well-crafted Scooby-Doo plot twist, demands further investigation and contemplation. So, as we embark on this buttery journey through the world of mystery-solving animated sleuths, let's not overlook the potential impact of seemingly unrelated variables on our beloved pop culture phenomena. After all, as any good researcher knows, it's important to consider all possibilities, no matter how surprising they may seem.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of the juxtaposition between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released has elicited a surprising amount of academic interest. Smith and Doe (2015) conducted a pioneering study examining the impact of dairy product consumption on animated film production, laying the foundation for our investigation. By utilizing regression analysis and box office data, the authors found a statistically significant relationship between cheese intake and the release of Wallace and Gromit animated shorts. Similarly, Jones (2018) delved into the influence of margarine consumption on the proliferation of Minions spin-off films, demonstrating a compelling connection that cannot be margi-forgotten.

In "The Big Butter Book," the authors delve into the multifaceted world of butter and its cultural implications, providing an insightful backdrop for our investigation into its potential influence on cinematic releases. Additionally, "The Economics of Animated Films" by Smith and Smith offers a comprehensive analysis of the factors impacting the production and distribution of animated features, laying the groundwork for our exploration of the butter-Scooby-Doo nexus.

Moving into the realm of fiction, "The Mystery of the Haunted Butter Factory" by Agatha Crustie presents a fictional account that unexpectedly mirrors our own research endeavors, albeit with a more sinister twist. Furthermore, "The Buttery Biscuit Mystery" by Sir Researchedalot explores the enigmatic link between baked goods and detective work, providing a tangential yet relevant perspective.

In our pursuit of understanding this peculiar link, we adopted a comprehensive approach to literature review, spanning beyond traditional academic sources. While the back of a shampoo bottle may seem like an unorthodox source of scholarly insight, we inadvertently stumbled upon a whimsical anecdote detailing the secret ingredient in a certain brand of shampoo, purportedly inspired by the love for mystery-solving canine companions. While not a conventional research methodology, it serves as a reminder that inspiration can be found in the most unexpected places, much like the butter-Scooby-Doo connection itself.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and IMDB . You used data from 1998 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Butter Effect: A Spread of Cinematic Proportions

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the curious relationship between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. By analyzing extensive data from the USDA and IMDB, we sought to uncover whether these two seemingly unrelated elements could be linked. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6467151 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1998 to 2021, illuminating a buttery connection that is of cinematic proportions.

While one might think this association is as illogical as a dairy-loving detective, our results suggest otherwise. This intriguing correlation, like a mystery in a Scooby-Doo film, may leave one scratching their head, but it cannot be ignored. The butter effect on the release of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films presents a new avenue for further exploration and encourages us to consider the impact of unexpected variables on pop culture phenomena. So, the next time you enjoy some butter on your toast, remember that it might just be influencing the Scooby-Doo universe!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
It is often said that "butter makes everything better," but could it also be making everything more cinematic? That's the tantalizing question we sought to answer in this research study. As curious as Shaggy and Scooby-Doo stumbling upon a mysterious snack, we embarked on a journey to investigate the peculiar relationship between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. It's a partnership that's as unexpected as a surprise reveal in a Scooby-Doo mystery, but our findings promise to shed light on this buttery enigma.
Before delving into the suspenseful findings, it's important to acknowledge the seemingly unconventional nature of our investigation. One might even say it's as unconventional as solving a mystery in a haunted mansion with a gang of meddling kids. Nevertheless, as researchers, we could not resist the temptation to explore this comical yet thought-provoking phenomenon. Just like Scooby and the gang following the trail of clues, we set out to uncover the truth behind this unlikely connection, armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism.
The idea of examining the relationship between butter consumption and the release of direct-to-video Scooby-Doo films might initially elicit a chuckle, but as our research progressed, we discovered that this correlation is no laughing matter. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6467151 and a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings unveiled a connection that is as striking as Velma's knack for solving mysteries. It seems that the butter effect is not just a spread for your morning toast; it may very well be spreading into the realms of animated cinema.
At this juncture, you might be wondering if this correlation is as flimsy as Scooby-Doo's attempt at disguising himself, but our results suggest otherwise. This whimsical yet intriguing association, much like a well-crafted Scooby-Doo plot twist, demands further investigation and contemplation. So, as we embark on this buttery journey through the world of mystery-solving animated sleuths, let's not overlook the potential impact of seemingly unrelated variables on our beloved pop culture phenomena. After all, as any good researcher knows, it's important to consider all possibilities, no matter how surprising they may seem.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic relationship between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released, our research team conjured up a methodology as unconventional as Fred's grand plans to capture the villain. We embarked on a quest across the digital landscape, scouring data from the USDA and IMDb to gather information on butter consumption and the release dates of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films from 1998 to 2021. This involved a careful analysis of butter production and consumption trends, as well as the chronological sequence of Scooby snacks and mysteries in animated form.

In a manner akin to the tireless persistence of the Mystery Inc. gang, we employed a series of statistical techniques to scrutinize the collected data. Our analysis involved a captivating dance of regression modeling, time series analysis, and spectral analysis, designed to tease out any lurking patterns and unveil the potential connection between buttery indulgence and the animated escapades of Scooby and his companions. We also conducted spectral decomposition of the butter consumption data to discern any hidden frequencies that could align with the release patterns of the direct-to-video films, akin to the gang deciphering cryptic clues.

At the heart of our methodology was the incorporation of control variables, such as general trends in animated media production and other relevant factors that could influence the release of direct-to-video films. It was crucial to ensure that our findings didn't unravel like a poorly constructed mask, so we diligently accounted for confounding variables that might cast doubt on the butter-Scooby-Doo connection. Our analysis was as thorough as Velma examining clues, leaving no stone unturned in our pursuit of statistically significant results.

Furthermore, we employed a multivariate approach, akin to the gang's collaboration when unmasking the villain, to explore the interplay of butter consumption with other cinematic phenomena, including the number of Shaggy's iconic exclamations and the frequency of Scooby snacks consumed on-screen. This allowed us to paint a comprehensive picture of the potential impact of butter on the Scooby-Doo universe, all the while maintaining a lighthearted spirit reminiscent of the gang's humorous escapades.

In addition to the quantitative data analysis, we sought qualitative insights through interviews with passionate fans of the Scooby-Doo franchise, adding a touch of anecdotal evidence to our investigation. This quirky yet invaluable input from Scooby enthusiasts provided a delightful layer of context to our findings, much like discovering a hidden passage in a spooky mansion.

Overall, our methodology combined rigorous statistical analyses with a touch of whimsy, much like a Scooby-Doo mystery itself. By navigating a maze of data and statistical techniques, we endeavored to shed light on the unforeseen, buttery influence on the world of animated cinema. As we present our findings, we hope to unravel this playful yet thought-provoking connection, inviting fellow researchers to join us in contemplating the unexplored realms of buttery cinematic mysteries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and IMDB .

For the time period 1998 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.6467151, r-squared of 0.4182404, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Butter Effect: A Spread of Cinematic Proportions

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the curious relationship between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. By analyzing extensive data from the USDA and IMDB, we sought to uncover whether these two seemingly unrelated elements could be linked. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6467151 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1998 to 2021, illuminating a buttery connection that is of cinematic proportions.

While one might think this association is as illogical as a dairy-loving detective, our results suggest otherwise. This intriguing correlation, like a mystery in a Scooby-Doo film, may leave one scratching their head, but it cannot be ignored. The butter effect on the release of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films presents a new avenue for further exploration and encourages us to consider the impact of unexpected variables on pop culture phenomena. So, the next time you enjoy some butter on your toast, remember that it might just be influencing the Scooby-Doo universe!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
It is often said that "butter makes everything better," but could it also be making everything more cinematic? That's the tantalizing question we sought to answer in this research study. As curious as Shaggy and Scooby-Doo stumbling upon a mysterious snack, we embarked on a journey to investigate the peculiar relationship between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. It's a partnership that's as unexpected as a surprise reveal in a Scooby-Doo mystery, but our findings promise to shed light on this buttery enigma.
Before delving into the suspenseful findings, it's important to acknowledge the seemingly unconventional nature of our investigation. One might even say it's as unconventional as solving a mystery in a haunted mansion with a gang of meddling kids. Nevertheless, as researchers, we could not resist the temptation to explore this comical yet thought-provoking phenomenon. Just like Scooby and the gang following the trail of clues, we set out to uncover the truth behind this unlikely connection, armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism.
The idea of examining the relationship between butter consumption and the release of direct-to-video Scooby-Doo films might initially elicit a chuckle, but as our research progressed, we discovered that this correlation is no laughing matter. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6467151 and a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings unveiled a connection that is as striking as Velma's knack for solving mysteries. It seems that the butter effect is not just a spread for your morning toast; it may very well be spreading into the realms of animated cinema.
At this juncture, you might be wondering if this correlation is as flimsy as Scooby-Doo's attempt at disguising himself, but our results suggest otherwise. This whimsical yet intriguing association, much like a well-crafted Scooby-Doo plot twist, demands further investigation and contemplation. So, as we embark on this buttery journey through the world of mystery-solving animated sleuths, let's not overlook the potential impact of seemingly unrelated variables on our beloved pop culture phenomena. After all, as any good researcher knows, it's important to consider all possibilities, no matter how surprising they may seem.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from 1998 to 2021 revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.6467151 between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. This suggests a moderately strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. It seems butter may indeed make everything better, including the production of animated canine mysteries.

This correlation is as surprising as finding a hidden passage in a spooky mansion! The evidence suggests that butter consumption is not only a delectable addition to many dishes but may also be a silent influencer of the cinematic adventures of Scooby-Doo and the gang.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.4182404 indicates that approximately 41.82% of the variability in the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released can be explained by the variation in butter consumption. It's clear that butter is playing a significant role in the proliferation of Scooby-Doo's escapades on screen.

One might say that the butter-Scooby-Doo connection is like a well-spread joke - it may seem cheesy, but our statistical analysis reveals a kernel of truth within.

A significance level of p < 0.01 further bolsters the credibility of this surprising association. This indicates that the observed correlation is not merely a fluke but holds substantial weight, much like the mysterious clues that ultimately lead the Scooby-Doo gang to unmask the villain.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates the robust correlation between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. This graph, much like a gripping scene in a Scooby-Doo mystery, offers a compelling illustration of the intimate relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Our findings not only provide a new perspective on the influence of butter consumption but also open doors to further investigations into unexpected connections within the realm of popular culture phenomena. Just as a mystery in a Scooby-Doo plot unfolds unpredictably, the impact of butter on the release of cinematic adventures starring everyone's favorite Great Dane demands further exploration.

In the end, while we may chuckle at the thought of butter influencing the world of animated dogs and meddling kids, our research underscores the importance of considering all potential influences, no matter how unconventional they may seem. Just like a cleverly placed clue in a Scooby-Doo mystery, it's the unexpected variables that often lead to solving the case.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Butter Effect: A Spread of Cinematic Proportions

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the curious relationship between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. By analyzing extensive data from the USDA and IMDB, we sought to uncover whether these two seemingly unrelated elements could be linked. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6467151 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1998 to 2021, illuminating a buttery connection that is of cinematic proportions.

While one might think this association is as illogical as a dairy-loving detective, our results suggest otherwise. This intriguing correlation, like a mystery in a Scooby-Doo film, may leave one scratching their head, but it cannot be ignored. The butter effect on the release of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films presents a new avenue for further exploration and encourages us to consider the impact of unexpected variables on pop culture phenomena. So, the next time you enjoy some butter on your toast, remember that it might just be influencing the Scooby-Doo universe!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the juxtaposition between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released has elicited a surprising amount of academic interest. Smith and Doe (2015) conducted a pioneering study examining the impact of dairy product consumption on animated film production, laying the foundation for our investigation. By utilizing regression analysis and box office data, the authors found a statistically significant relationship between cheese intake and the release of Wallace and Gromit animated shorts. Similarly, Jones (2018) delved into the influence of margarine consumption on the proliferation of Minions spin-off films, demonstrating a compelling connection that cannot be margi-forgotten.
In "The Big Butter Book," the authors delve into the multifaceted world of butter and its cultural implications, providing an insightful backdrop for our investigation into its potential influence on cinematic releases. Additionally, "The Economics of Animated Films" by Smith and Smith offers a comprehensive analysis of the factors impacting the production and distribution of animated features, laying the groundwork for our exploration of the butter-Scooby-Doo nexus.
Moving into the realm of fiction, "The Mystery of the Haunted Butter Factory" by Agatha Crustie presents a fictional account that unexpectedly mirrors our own research endeavors, albeit with a more sinister twist. Furthermore, "The Buttery Biscuit Mystery" by Sir Researchedalot explores the enigmatic link between baked goods and detective work, providing a tangential yet relevant perspective.
In our pursuit of understanding this peculiar link, we adopted a comprehensive approach to literature review, spanning beyond traditional academic sources. While the back of a shampoo bottle may seem like an unorthodox source of scholarly insight, we inadvertently stumbled upon a whimsical anecdote detailing the secret ingredient in a certain brand of shampoo, purportedly inspired by the love for mystery-solving canine companions. While not a conventional research methodology, it serves as a reminder that inspiration can be found in the most unexpected places, much like the butter-Scooby-Doo connection itself.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from 1998 to 2021 revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.6467151 between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. This suggests a moderately strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. It seems butter may indeed make everything better, including the production of animated canine mysteries.
This correlation is as surprising as finding a hidden passage in a spooky mansion! The evidence suggests that butter consumption is not only a delectable addition to many dishes but may also be a silent influencer of the cinematic adventures of Scooby-Doo and the gang.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.4182404 indicates that approximately 41.82% of the variability in the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released can be explained by the variation in butter consumption. It's clear that butter is playing a significant role in the proliferation of Scooby-Doo's escapades on screen.
One might say that the butter-Scooby-Doo connection is like a well-spread joke - it may seem cheesy, but our statistical analysis reveals a kernel of truth within.
A significance level of p < 0.01 further bolsters the credibility of this surprising association. This indicates that the observed correlation is not merely a fluke but holds substantial weight, much like the mysterious clues that ultimately lead the Scooby-Doo gang to unmask the villain.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates the robust correlation between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. This graph, much like a gripping scene in a Scooby-Doo mystery, offers a compelling illustration of the intimate relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.
Our findings not only provide a new perspective on the influence of butter consumption but also open doors to further investigations into unexpected connections within the realm of popular culture phenomena. Just as a mystery in a Scooby-Doo plot unfolds unpredictably, the impact of butter on the release of cinematic adventures starring everyone's favorite Great Dane demands further exploration.
In the end, while we may chuckle at the thought of butter influencing the world of animated dogs and meddling kids, our research underscores the importance of considering all potential influences, no matter how unconventional they may seem. Just like a cleverly placed clue in a Scooby-Doo mystery, it's the unexpected variables that often lead to solving the case.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The insights gained from our study have shed light on the intriguing relationship between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. Our findings not only validate prior research that has hinted at unexpected influences on cinematic production, but they also bring to the forefront the influence of butter as a potential factor in shaping pop culture phenomena.

Our research corroborates the pioneering work of Smith and Doe (2015), who illuminated the impact of dairy product consumption on animated film production. The statistically significant relationship they observed between cheese intake and the release of Wallace and Gromit animated shorts aligns with our own findings, underscoring the broader influence of dairy products on the creation of animated content. It seems that dairy, much like a cunning villain in a Scooby-Doo plot, may be quietly pulling the strings behind the scenes.

Similarly, the work of Jones (2018) examining the connection between margarine consumption and the proliferation of Minions spin-off films finds resonance in our study. The compelling correlation he demonstrated hints at the broader influence of spreadable fats on the production of animated content, paralleling our own discovery of the butter-Scooby-Doo connection. It appears that the impact of butter and its spreadable companions extends far beyond the breakfast table and into the realm of animated entertainment.

Our findings also support the comprehensive analysis of "The Economics of Animated Films" by Smith and Smith, underscoring the multifaceted factors that shape the production and distribution of animated features. Just as a complex mystery in a Scooby-Doo narrative unfolds through numerous clues, the influence of butter on the release of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films adds another layer to the intricate web of factors shaping animated content creation.

Moreover, our study aligns with the whimsical anecdotes found in unconventional sources such as the back of a shampoo bottle. The unexpected inspiration gleaned from these sources serves as a reminder that the most unlikely places may harbor the seeds of important discoveries. Just as a surprise clue in a Scooby-Doo episode leads the gang to solve the mystery, our unconventional sources of insight have enriched our understanding of the butter-Scooby-Doo connection.

In essence, our research has added a new dimension to the understanding of animated film production by uncovering the influence of butter consumption on the release of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of pop culture phenomena, it becomes clear that factors as seemingly inconsequential as butter can have a tangible impact on the entertainment landscape. Just as a clever pun in a Scooby-Doo dialogue adds a dash of humor to the narrative, our findings inject a touch of unexpected delight into the study of cinematic influences.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Butter Effect: A Spread of Cinematic Proportions

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the curious relationship between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. By analyzing extensive data from the USDA and IMDB, we sought to uncover whether these two seemingly unrelated elements could be linked. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6467151 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1998 to 2021, illuminating a buttery connection that is of cinematic proportions.

While one might think this association is as illogical as a dairy-loving detective, our results suggest otherwise. This intriguing correlation, like a mystery in a Scooby-Doo film, may leave one scratching their head, but it cannot be ignored. The butter effect on the release of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films presents a new avenue for further exploration and encourages us to consider the impact of unexpected variables on pop culture phenomena. So, the next time you enjoy some butter on your toast, remember that it might just be influencing the Scooby-Doo universe!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
It is often said that "butter makes everything better," but could it also be making everything more cinematic? That's the tantalizing question we sought to answer in this research study. As curious as Shaggy and Scooby-Doo stumbling upon a mysterious snack, we embarked on a journey to investigate the peculiar relationship between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. It's a partnership that's as unexpected as a surprise reveal in a Scooby-Doo mystery, but our findings promise to shed light on this buttery enigma.
Before delving into the suspenseful findings, it's important to acknowledge the seemingly unconventional nature of our investigation. One might even say it's as unconventional as solving a mystery in a haunted mansion with a gang of meddling kids. Nevertheless, as researchers, we could not resist the temptation to explore this comical yet thought-provoking phenomenon. Just like Scooby and the gang following the trail of clues, we set out to uncover the truth behind this unlikely connection, armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism.
The idea of examining the relationship between butter consumption and the release of direct-to-video Scooby-Doo films might initially elicit a chuckle, but as our research progressed, we discovered that this correlation is no laughing matter. With a correlation coefficient of 0.6467151 and a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings unveiled a connection that is as striking as Velma's knack for solving mysteries. It seems that the butter effect is not just a spread for your morning toast; it may very well be spreading into the realms of animated cinema.
At this juncture, you might be wondering if this correlation is as flimsy as Scooby-Doo's attempt at disguising himself, but our results suggest otherwise. This whimsical yet intriguing association, much like a well-crafted Scooby-Doo plot twist, demands further investigation and contemplation. So, as we embark on this buttery journey through the world of mystery-solving animated sleuths, let's not overlook the potential impact of seemingly unrelated variables on our beloved pop culture phenomena. After all, as any good researcher knows, it's important to consider all possibilities, no matter how surprising they may seem.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from 1998 to 2021 revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.6467151 between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. This suggests a moderately strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. It seems butter may indeed make everything better, including the production of animated canine mysteries.
This correlation is as surprising as finding a hidden passage in a spooky mansion! The evidence suggests that butter consumption is not only a delectable addition to many dishes but may also be a silent influencer of the cinematic adventures of Scooby-Doo and the gang.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.4182404 indicates that approximately 41.82% of the variability in the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released can be explained by the variation in butter consumption. It's clear that butter is playing a significant role in the proliferation of Scooby-Doo's escapades on screen.
One might say that the butter-Scooby-Doo connection is like a well-spread joke - it may seem cheesy, but our statistical analysis reveals a kernel of truth within.
A significance level of p < 0.01 further bolsters the credibility of this surprising association. This indicates that the observed correlation is not merely a fluke but holds substantial weight, much like the mysterious clues that ultimately lead the Scooby-Doo gang to unmask the villain.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates the robust correlation between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. This graph, much like a gripping scene in a Scooby-Doo mystery, offers a compelling illustration of the intimate relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.
Our findings not only provide a new perspective on the influence of butter consumption but also open doors to further investigations into unexpected connections within the realm of popular culture phenomena. Just as a mystery in a Scooby-Doo plot unfolds unpredictably, the impact of butter on the release of cinematic adventures starring everyone's favorite Great Dane demands further exploration.
In the end, while we may chuckle at the thought of butter influencing the world of animated dogs and meddling kids, our research underscores the importance of considering all potential influences, no matter how unconventional they may seem. Just like a cleverly placed clue in a Scooby-Doo mystery, it's the unexpected variables that often lead to solving the case.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

Our research has unveiled a buttery connection of cinematic proportions, demonstrating a surprising correlation between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. It seems that butter doesn't just make pancakes better; it may also be making Scooby-Doo's adventures more plentiful. Talk about spreading the buttery love!
Just like Shaggy's love for snacks, our results suggest a strong positive linear relationship between butter consumption and the proliferation of everyone's favorite mystery-solving Great Dane. It's clear that butter is leaving its mark on the world of animated cinema in ways we never imagined. You could even say it's "buttering up" the industry!
With a significant correlation coefficient and a robust r-squared value, we can confidently state that this association is not as flimsy as one of Scooby-Doo's disguises. It holds significant weight, much like a Scooby Snack in the hands of a hungry hound.
The scatterplot beautifully captures the intimate relationship between butter consumption and the release of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films, much like a captivating scene in one of the mystery-solving canine's adventures. The evidence is as compelling as a cliffhanger in a classic Scooby-Doo episode.
In conclusion, our findings encourage us to consider the impact of unexpected variables on pop culture phenomena. It's a reminder that even seemingly unrelated elements, like butter and animated sleuths, can have surprising connections. It's food for thought, both figuratively and literally!
Based on this buttery research, it's safe to say that no more investigation is needed into the connection between butter consumption and the release of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films. Like a well-solved mystery, this relationship has been uncovered, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the hidden influences shaping our beloved cinematic adventures. Case closed!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Butter Effect: A Spread of Cinematic Proportions. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Culinary Cinema Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Butter Effect: A Spread of Cinematic Proportions. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Movie-Centric Cognition Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Butter Effect: A Spread of Cinematic Proportions with an abstract of In this study, we examine the curious relationship between butter consumption and the number of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films released. By analyzing extensive data from the USDA and IMDB, we sought to uncover whether these two seemingly unrelated elements could be linked. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6467151 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1998 to 2021, illuminating a buttery connection that is of cinematic proportions.
While one might think this association is as illogical as a dairy-loving detective, our results suggest otherwise. This intriguing correlation, like a mystery in a Scooby-Doo film, may leave one scratching their head, but it cannot be ignored. The butter effect on the release of Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films presents a new avenue for further exploration and encourages us to consider the impact of unexpected variables on pop culture phenomena. So, the next time you enjoy some butter on your toast, remember that it might just be influencing the Scooby-Doo universe!

ChatGPT:

butter consumption, Scooby-Doo direct-to-video films, cinematic influence, correlation coefficient, USDA data, IMDB data, pop culture phenomena

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Butter consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Butter in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Butter consumption

Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released
Detailed data title: Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released annually
Source: IMDB
See what else correlates with Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released

Correlation r = 0.6467151 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4182404 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 41.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Butter consumption) over the 24 years from 1998 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00064. 0.0006379586578601186000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.65 in 0.064% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,567 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 23 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 23 because we have two variables measured over a period of 24 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.33, 0.83 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Butter consumption (Pounds per person)4.34.64.54.34.44.54.54.54.74.7554.95.45.55.55.55.65.75.766.26.36.5
Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released (Films)111102121111213222223222




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.3,4.6,4.5,4.3,4.4,4.5,4.5,4.5,4.7,4.7,5,5,4.9,5.4,5.5,5.5,5.5,5.6,5.7,5.7,6,6.2,6.3,6.5,])
array_2 = np.array([1,1,1,1,0,2,1,2,1,1,1,1,2,1,3,2,2,2,2,2,3,2,2,2,])
array_1_name = "Butter consumption"
array_2_name = "Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 1418 · Black Variable ID: 557 · Red Variable ID: 182
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0