about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,386 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Academy Award Best Actress Winner's Age and the second variable is Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released.  The chart goes from 1998 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the Best Actress winners aged, there was a noticeable rise in wisdom and gravitas in the film industry. This led to a demand for more sophisticated and nuanced roles, prompting the creation of complex female characters in the Scooby Doo direct-to-video films. It seems the older the actress, the more these films became real scream queens! The connection between age and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films is truly a mystery for the ages.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a Cyber folk woman in her late 30s standing proudly with an Oscar statuette in her hand. She exudes confidence and glamour. Surrounding her are multiple animated dog characters from various direct-to-video Scooby Doo films, each in a playful and lively manner. The scene captures the whimsical interaction between the woman and the animated dogs, with a futuristic and folk-inspired cyber backdrop. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Academy Award Best Actress Winner's Age and Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyber folk Data cyber art Surrealism Parallax art Cubism
ChatGPT: Cyber folk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Academy Award Best Actress Winner's Age and Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A woman in her late 30s holding an Oscar statuette, surrounded by animated dog characters from various direct-to-video Scooby Doo films.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyber folk ] and depicting this scene: A woman in her late 30s holding an Oscar statuette, surrounded by animated dog characters from various direct-to-video Scooby Doo films. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a Cyber folk woman in her late 30s standing proudly with an Oscar statuette in her hand. She exudes confidence and glamour. Surrounding her are multiple animated dog characters from various direct-to-video Scooby Doo films, each in a playful and lively manner. The scene captures the whimsical interaction between the woman and the animated dogs, with a futuristic and folk-inspired cyber backdrop.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Academy Award Best Actress Winner's Age caused Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
The Age of Role: Unveiling the Silver Screen Scooby Doo Connection

Journal of Popular Culture and Film Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Academy Award Best Actress Winner's Age and Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and IMDB to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.5017053 and p < 0.05 for 1998 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Age of Role: Unveiling the Silver Screen Scooby Doo Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the peculiar yet intriguing relationship between the age of Academy Award Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released from 1998 to 2021. Utilizing data sourced from reputable platforms such as Wikipedia and IMDB, our research team embarked upon this whimsical exploration. The correlation coefficient of 0.5017053 and p < 0.05 uncovered a surprising association, raising eyebrows and leaving us both scratching our heads and chuckling. It appears that as the age of the Best Actress winners increases, so does the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. This research contributes a playful yet thought-provoking dimension to the world of cinematic analysis and statistical investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Academy Award Best Actress Winner's Age and Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Age of Role: Unveiling the Silver Screen Scooby Doo Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the peculiar yet intriguing relationship between the age of Academy Award Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released from 1998 to 2021. Utilizing data sourced from reputable platforms such as Wikipedia and IMDB, our research team embarked upon this whimsical exploration. The correlation coefficient of 0.5017053 and p < 0.05 uncovered a surprising association, raising eyebrows and leaving us both scratching our heads and chuckling. It appears that as the age of the Best Actress winners increases, so does the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. This research contributes a playful yet thought-provoking dimension to the world of cinematic analysis and statistical investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of Hollywood glitz and animated mystery-solving poochery may seem like an improbable subject for serious academic inquiry, but lo and behold, here we are! In this paper, we delve into the enchanting world where the elegance of Best Actress winners' ages meets the zany escapades of everyone's favorite crime-busting Great Dane and his gang. The tantalizing question that captivated our scholarly minds was whether there exists a connection between the age of Academy Award Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. Can you even fathom the potential implications of such a correlation?

As we embarked upon this whimsical exploration, we were armed with the indispensable tools of statistical analysis, data sourcing, and a penchant for mixing the bizarre with the scholarly. Delving into the vast archives of Wikipedia and the Internet Movie Database (IMDb), we meticulously assembled the relevant data spanning the years from 1998 to 2021. Utilizing these reputable platforms, we unfolded a hitherto undiscovered relationship, throwing a spotlight on the silver screen synergy that toes the line between statistical peculiarity and jocular serendipity.

Our passion for uncovering hidden patterns and unearthing the unexpected led us to compute a correlation coefficient of 0.5017053, indicative of a definite association that is, dare I say, both eyebrow-raising and chuckle-inducing. Indeed, with a p-value less than 0.05, we were left with no choice but to herald this uncanny nexus as a genuine finding, much to our own surprise and bemusement.

This research aims to contribute to the gaiety of the statistical and cinematic domains by unearthing a connection that is as captivating as it is unconventional. We invite you to join us in this journey of discovery, where the whimsy of Hollywood intertwines with the earnestness of statistical investigation, resulting in a delightful and thought-provoking revelation. So, buckle up and prepare to unveil the "Role" in the silver screen Scooby Doo connection!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Academy Award Best Actress Winner's Age and Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Age of Role: Unveiling the Silver Screen Scooby Doo Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the peculiar yet intriguing relationship between the age of Academy Award Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released from 1998 to 2021. Utilizing data sourced from reputable platforms such as Wikipedia and IMDB, our research team embarked upon this whimsical exploration. The correlation coefficient of 0.5017053 and p < 0.05 uncovered a surprising association, raising eyebrows and leaving us both scratching our heads and chuckling. It appears that as the age of the Best Actress winners increases, so does the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. This research contributes a playful yet thought-provoking dimension to the world of cinematic analysis and statistical investigation.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of Hollywood glitz and animated mystery-solving poochery may seem like an improbable subject for serious academic inquiry, but lo and behold, here we are! In this paper, we delve into the enchanting world where the elegance of Best Actress winners' ages meets the zany escapades of everyone's favorite crime-busting Great Dane and his gang. The tantalizing question that captivated our scholarly minds was whether there exists a connection between the age of Academy Award Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. Can you even fathom the potential implications of such a correlation?
As we embarked upon this whimsical exploration, we were armed with the indispensable tools of statistical analysis, data sourcing, and a penchant for mixing the bizarre with the scholarly. Delving into the vast archives of Wikipedia and the Internet Movie Database (IMDb), we meticulously assembled the relevant data spanning the years from 1998 to 2021. Utilizing these reputable platforms, we unfolded a hitherto undiscovered relationship, throwing a spotlight on the silver screen synergy that toes the line between statistical peculiarity and jocular serendipity.
Our passion for uncovering hidden patterns and unearthing the unexpected led us to compute a correlation coefficient of 0.5017053, indicative of a definite association that is, dare I say, both eyebrow-raising and chuckle-inducing. Indeed, with a p-value less than 0.05, we were left with no choice but to herald this uncanny nexus as a genuine finding, much to our own surprise and bemusement.
This research aims to contribute to the gaiety of the statistical and cinematic domains by unearthing a connection that is as captivating as it is unconventional. We invite you to join us in this journey of discovery, where the whimsy of Hollywood intertwines with the earnestness of statistical investigation, resulting in a delightful and thought-provoking revelation. So, buckle up and prepare to unveil the "Role" in the silver screen Scooby Doo connection!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The enthralling intersection of age and cinematic canine capers in our investigation sparked a fervent quest to unearth any previous scholarly endeavors that may have meandered into similar realms of frivolity and statistical quirkiness. Our pursuit led us to the works of Smith, Doe, and Jones, who, albeit unintentionally, provided the intellectual backdrop for our inquiry.

In "Age and Achievement in Cinema," Smith conducts a comprehensive analysis of the age distribution of Academy Award winners across various categories. While Smith's focus is primarily on broader trends in age and cinematic accolades, the intersection with the specific realm of Best Actress winners and their potential impact on ancillary animated productions remains unexplored.

Doe's "Cinema and Correlations" offers a broad survey of potential correlations within the film industry, from box office trends to critical acclaim. Nevertheless, Doe's work skirts around the periphery of our specific focus, failing to delve into the surreptitious relationship between the age of Best Actress winners and the surge in Scooby Doo direct-to-video releases.

Jones, in "Animated Expansions: A Statistical Analysis of Direct-to-Video Franchises," presents a meticulous examination of various direct-to-video animated series expansions. However, much to our consternation, Jones bypasses the curious linkage between the age of Best Actress winners and the proliferation of Scooby Doo direct-to-video productions.

Beyond the confines of academia, the whimsical stylings of non-fiction works such as "The Scooby Doo Files: Unveiling the Mystery" and "Actresses Through the Ages: A Cinematic Chronicle" offered tangential insights into the realms of animation and the silver screen, but alas, they scarcely grazed the elusive nexus we sought to unravel.

In the realm of fiction, "The Case of the Enigmatic Ingenue" and "Mysterious Matriarchs: An Animated Adventure" teased the prospect of a tantalizing connection between the allure of Best Actress winners and the animated escapades of our beloved canine detective. Alas, their whimsy was veiled in the fabric of narrative imagination, leaving us adrift in a sea of statistical yearning.

On the borders of relevancy, the board game "Clue: Scooby Doo Edition" beckoned with its own cryptographic meanderings and enigmatic twists, offering a whimsical diversion from the rigors of our statistical inquiry. However, the game itself failed to shed any light on the correlation we sought, leaving us to ponder the capricious nature of our academic pursuits in the midst of playful diversion.

As the tapestry of literature unfolded before us, it became evident that the intersection of age, animated mystery, and cinematic achievement remained shrouded in enigma, awaiting our intrepid foray into the unknown with the fervor of scholarly inquiry and the whimsy of statistical quirk.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Academy Award Best Actress Winner's Age and Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and IMDB . You used data from 1998 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Age of Role: Unveiling the Silver Screen Scooby Doo Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the peculiar yet intriguing relationship between the age of Academy Award Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released from 1998 to 2021. Utilizing data sourced from reputable platforms such as Wikipedia and IMDB, our research team embarked upon this whimsical exploration. The correlation coefficient of 0.5017053 and p < 0.05 uncovered a surprising association, raising eyebrows and leaving us both scratching our heads and chuckling. It appears that as the age of the Best Actress winners increases, so does the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. This research contributes a playful yet thought-provoking dimension to the world of cinematic analysis and statistical investigation.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of Hollywood glitz and animated mystery-solving poochery may seem like an improbable subject for serious academic inquiry, but lo and behold, here we are! In this paper, we delve into the enchanting world where the elegance of Best Actress winners' ages meets the zany escapades of everyone's favorite crime-busting Great Dane and his gang. The tantalizing question that captivated our scholarly minds was whether there exists a connection between the age of Academy Award Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. Can you even fathom the potential implications of such a correlation?
As we embarked upon this whimsical exploration, we were armed with the indispensable tools of statistical analysis, data sourcing, and a penchant for mixing the bizarre with the scholarly. Delving into the vast archives of Wikipedia and the Internet Movie Database (IMDb), we meticulously assembled the relevant data spanning the years from 1998 to 2021. Utilizing these reputable platforms, we unfolded a hitherto undiscovered relationship, throwing a spotlight on the silver screen synergy that toes the line between statistical peculiarity and jocular serendipity.
Our passion for uncovering hidden patterns and unearthing the unexpected led us to compute a correlation coefficient of 0.5017053, indicative of a definite association that is, dare I say, both eyebrow-raising and chuckle-inducing. Indeed, with a p-value less than 0.05, we were left with no choice but to herald this uncanny nexus as a genuine finding, much to our own surprise and bemusement.
This research aims to contribute to the gaiety of the statistical and cinematic domains by unearthing a connection that is as captivating as it is unconventional. We invite you to join us in this journey of discovery, where the whimsy of Hollywood intertwines with the earnestness of statistical investigation, resulting in a delightful and thought-provoking revelation. So, buckle up and prepare to unveil the "Role" in the silver screen Scooby Doo connection!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To begin our whimsical voyage of statistical discovery, we first identified the set of Academy Award Best Actress winners from the years 1998 to 2021. This involved meticulously scouring the archives of Wikipedia, with its curious blend of accurate information and the occasional quizzical embellishment, to compile a comprehensive list of the esteemed individuals who had triumphed in their portrayal of on-screen characters in leading roles.

Simultaneously, we embarked upon the task of tracking down the number of direct-to-video Scooby Doo films released during the same period. The treasure trove of cinematic data nestled within the confines of the Internet Movie Database (IMDb) served as our compass in navigating the nebulous realm of direct-to-video animated mysteries featuring our beloved canine protagonist and his trusty cohort.

Having compiled the age of each Academy Award Best Actress winner at the time of their accolade and the corresponding count of Scooby Doo direct-to-video releases, we then leapt into the domain of statistical analysis with gusto befitting of a caped crusader. Our exploration of the data commenced with a series of exploratory data analysis techniques, including creating scatterplots and histograms, to uncover any underlying trends or patterns.

Upon establishing an initial understanding of the data, we proceeded to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between the age of Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films. This entailed navigating the treacherous river of statistical software, where the siren calls of p-values and confidence intervals beckoned to both enlighten and confound us.

Finally, having surfed the waves of statistical significance, we assessed the robustness of our findings through a rigorous sensitivity analysis to ensure that our results withstood the tempests of potential outliers and data perturbations. This process enabled us to engender confidence in the veracity of our curious yet captivating discovery.

In summary, our research methodology comprised a whimsically rigorous exploration of data sourcing, statistical analysis, and an unyielding commitment to injecting a dash of lightheartedness into the otherwise austere realm of scientific inquiry. The ensuing findings, as detailed in our otherworldly results section, are sure to illuminate the scholarly mind while eliciting a chuckle or two from the astute reader.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Academy Award Best Actress Winner's Age and Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and IMDB .

For the time period 1998 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.5017053, r-squared of 0.2517082, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Age of Role: Unveiling the Silver Screen Scooby Doo Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the peculiar yet intriguing relationship between the age of Academy Award Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released from 1998 to 2021. Utilizing data sourced from reputable platforms such as Wikipedia and IMDB, our research team embarked upon this whimsical exploration. The correlation coefficient of 0.5017053 and p < 0.05 uncovered a surprising association, raising eyebrows and leaving us both scratching our heads and chuckling. It appears that as the age of the Best Actress winners increases, so does the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. This research contributes a playful yet thought-provoking dimension to the world of cinematic analysis and statistical investigation.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of Hollywood glitz and animated mystery-solving poochery may seem like an improbable subject for serious academic inquiry, but lo and behold, here we are! In this paper, we delve into the enchanting world where the elegance of Best Actress winners' ages meets the zany escapades of everyone's favorite crime-busting Great Dane and his gang. The tantalizing question that captivated our scholarly minds was whether there exists a connection between the age of Academy Award Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. Can you even fathom the potential implications of such a correlation?
As we embarked upon this whimsical exploration, we were armed with the indispensable tools of statistical analysis, data sourcing, and a penchant for mixing the bizarre with the scholarly. Delving into the vast archives of Wikipedia and the Internet Movie Database (IMDb), we meticulously assembled the relevant data spanning the years from 1998 to 2021. Utilizing these reputable platforms, we unfolded a hitherto undiscovered relationship, throwing a spotlight on the silver screen synergy that toes the line between statistical peculiarity and jocular serendipity.
Our passion for uncovering hidden patterns and unearthing the unexpected led us to compute a correlation coefficient of 0.5017053, indicative of a definite association that is, dare I say, both eyebrow-raising and chuckle-inducing. Indeed, with a p-value less than 0.05, we were left with no choice but to herald this uncanny nexus as a genuine finding, much to our own surprise and bemusement.
This research aims to contribute to the gaiety of the statistical and cinematic domains by unearthing a connection that is as captivating as it is unconventional. We invite you to join us in this journey of discovery, where the whimsy of Hollywood intertwines with the earnestness of statistical investigation, resulting in a delightful and thought-provoking revelation. So, buckle up and prepare to unveil the "Role" in the silver screen Scooby Doo connection!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our study revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5017053, indicating a moderate positive relationship between the age of Academy Award Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. This finding suggests that as the age of the Best Actress winners increases, there is a tendency for more Scooby Doo direct-to-video films to hit the animated airwaves.

The r-squared value of 0.2517082 further indicates that approximately 25.17% of the variability in the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films can be explained by the age of the Best Actress winners. While this may not explain the entire mystery, it certainly sheds light on a noteworthy portion of it.

With a p-value of less than 0.05, we have statistically significant evidence to support the existence of this association. It appears that this unexpected connection is not simply the stuff of whimsical fancy, but a genuine statistical phenomenon that tickles the fancy and boggles the mind.

We present Figure 1, a scatterplot showcasing the robust correlation between the age of Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. Behold the captivating intertwining of these two seemingly disparate variables, creating a narrative that blends the elegance of Hollywood's leading ladies with the escapades of a mystery-solving mutt.

In conclusion, our study offers a lighthearted yet compelling addition to the world of statistical analysis and cinematic exploration. The silver screen and the animated realm have indeed conspired to weave a tale that, in the spirit of Scooby Doo himself, is a delightful blend of humor, mystery, and unexpected connections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Academy Award Best Actress Winner's Age and Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Age of Role: Unveiling the Silver Screen Scooby Doo Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the peculiar yet intriguing relationship between the age of Academy Award Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released from 1998 to 2021. Utilizing data sourced from reputable platforms such as Wikipedia and IMDB, our research team embarked upon this whimsical exploration. The correlation coefficient of 0.5017053 and p < 0.05 uncovered a surprising association, raising eyebrows and leaving us both scratching our heads and chuckling. It appears that as the age of the Best Actress winners increases, so does the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. This research contributes a playful yet thought-provoking dimension to the world of cinematic analysis and statistical investigation.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The enthralling intersection of age and cinematic canine capers in our investigation sparked a fervent quest to unearth any previous scholarly endeavors that may have meandered into similar realms of frivolity and statistical quirkiness. Our pursuit led us to the works of Smith, Doe, and Jones, who, albeit unintentionally, provided the intellectual backdrop for our inquiry.
In "Age and Achievement in Cinema," Smith conducts a comprehensive analysis of the age distribution of Academy Award winners across various categories. While Smith's focus is primarily on broader trends in age and cinematic accolades, the intersection with the specific realm of Best Actress winners and their potential impact on ancillary animated productions remains unexplored.
Doe's "Cinema and Correlations" offers a broad survey of potential correlations within the film industry, from box office trends to critical acclaim. Nevertheless, Doe's work skirts around the periphery of our specific focus, failing to delve into the surreptitious relationship between the age of Best Actress winners and the surge in Scooby Doo direct-to-video releases.
Jones, in "Animated Expansions: A Statistical Analysis of Direct-to-Video Franchises," presents a meticulous examination of various direct-to-video animated series expansions. However, much to our consternation, Jones bypasses the curious linkage between the age of Best Actress winners and the proliferation of Scooby Doo direct-to-video productions.
Beyond the confines of academia, the whimsical stylings of non-fiction works such as "The Scooby Doo Files: Unveiling the Mystery" and "Actresses Through the Ages: A Cinematic Chronicle" offered tangential insights into the realms of animation and the silver screen, but alas, they scarcely grazed the elusive nexus we sought to unravel.
In the realm of fiction, "The Case of the Enigmatic Ingenue" and "Mysterious Matriarchs: An Animated Adventure" teased the prospect of a tantalizing connection between the allure of Best Actress winners and the animated escapades of our beloved canine detective. Alas, their whimsy was veiled in the fabric of narrative imagination, leaving us adrift in a sea of statistical yearning.
On the borders of relevancy, the board game "Clue: Scooby Doo Edition" beckoned with its own cryptographic meanderings and enigmatic twists, offering a whimsical diversion from the rigors of our statistical inquiry. However, the game itself failed to shed any light on the correlation we sought, leaving us to ponder the capricious nature of our academic pursuits in the midst of playful diversion.
As the tapestry of literature unfolded before us, it became evident that the intersection of age, animated mystery, and cinematic achievement remained shrouded in enigma, awaiting our intrepid foray into the unknown with the fervor of scholarly inquiry and the whimsy of statistical quirk.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5017053, indicating a moderate positive relationship between the age of Academy Award Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. This finding suggests that as the age of the Best Actress winners increases, there is a tendency for more Scooby Doo direct-to-video films to hit the animated airwaves.
The r-squared value of 0.2517082 further indicates that approximately 25.17% of the variability in the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films can be explained by the age of the Best Actress winners. While this may not explain the entire mystery, it certainly sheds light on a noteworthy portion of it.
With a p-value of less than 0.05, we have statistically significant evidence to support the existence of this association. It appears that this unexpected connection is not simply the stuff of whimsical fancy, but a genuine statistical phenomenon that tickles the fancy and boggles the mind.
We present Figure 1, a scatterplot showcasing the robust correlation between the age of Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. Behold the captivating intertwining of these two seemingly disparate variables, creating a narrative that blends the elegance of Hollywood's leading ladies with the escapades of a mystery-solving mutt.
In conclusion, our study offers a lighthearted yet compelling addition to the world of statistical analysis and cinematic exploration. The silver screen and the animated realm have indeed conspired to weave a tale that, in the spirit of Scooby Doo himself, is a delightful blend of humor, mystery, and unexpected connections.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have unveiled a previously undisclosed correlation between the age of Academy Award Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released, adding a whimsical layer of complexity to the world of cinematic analysis. The moderate positive relationship revealed in our results aligns with the prior works of Smith, Doe, and Jones, who unwittingly laid the groundwork for our investigation. Smith's comprehensive analysis of age and achievement in cinema, although not focused on animated productions, hinted at the potential influence of age on creative outputs. Doe's survey of correlations within the film industry meandered close to our peculiar nexus, while Jones' examination of direct-to-video franchises offered a tantalizing glimpse into the world of animated expansions. These prior works, perhaps overlooked in their comedic potential, underscore the surprising link we've uncovered.

The association between the age of Best Actress winners and the surge in Scooby Doo direct-to-video releases, confirmed by the statistically significant p-value, challenges conventional perceptions of cinematic influence and creative output. As the leading ladies of Hollywood mature, they appear to exert a curious pull on the frequency of Scooby Doo's animated escapades, inviting delightful speculation on the whims of cinematic fate and statistical serendipity.

Our findings, emboldened by the robust correlation coefficient and compelling scatterplot, beckon further inquiry into the enigmatic forces at play within the realms of animated mischief and the Hollywood limelight. The r-squared value, illuminating a substantial portion of the variability in direct-to-video releases, inspires both a wry smile and a furrowed brow as we grapple with the captivating mystery of this unexpected connection.

In juxtaposition with the lighthearted musings of "The Scooby Doo Files" and the cryptic allure of "Clue: Scooby Doo Edition," our scholarly pursuit adds a layer of statistical rigor and empirical validation to the capricious intersection of age, animation, and acclaim. With a nod to the tantalizing whimsy of our literary predecessors and a wry acknowledgment of the playful diversion the board game world offers, our study shatters the perceived boundaries of statistical inquiry, inviting both chuckles and contemplation.

As we stand at the crossroads of silver screen sophistication and canine capers, our investigation leaves us with an arch of the eyebrow, a tug at the corners of the mouth, and a renewed appreciation for the unforeseen connections that the world of research, statistics, and cinematic whimsy can unveil.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Academy Award Best Actress Winner's Age and Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Age of Role: Unveiling the Silver Screen Scooby Doo Connection"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the peculiar yet intriguing relationship between the age of Academy Award Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released from 1998 to 2021. Utilizing data sourced from reputable platforms such as Wikipedia and IMDB, our research team embarked upon this whimsical exploration. The correlation coefficient of 0.5017053 and p < 0.05 uncovered a surprising association, raising eyebrows and leaving us both scratching our heads and chuckling. It appears that as the age of the Best Actress winners increases, so does the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. This research contributes a playful yet thought-provoking dimension to the world of cinematic analysis and statistical investigation.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of Hollywood glitz and animated mystery-solving poochery may seem like an improbable subject for serious academic inquiry, but lo and behold, here we are! In this paper, we delve into the enchanting world where the elegance of Best Actress winners' ages meets the zany escapades of everyone's favorite crime-busting Great Dane and his gang. The tantalizing question that captivated our scholarly minds was whether there exists a connection between the age of Academy Award Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. Can you even fathom the potential implications of such a correlation?
As we embarked upon this whimsical exploration, we were armed with the indispensable tools of statistical analysis, data sourcing, and a penchant for mixing the bizarre with the scholarly. Delving into the vast archives of Wikipedia and the Internet Movie Database (IMDb), we meticulously assembled the relevant data spanning the years from 1998 to 2021. Utilizing these reputable platforms, we unfolded a hitherto undiscovered relationship, throwing a spotlight on the silver screen synergy that toes the line between statistical peculiarity and jocular serendipity.
Our passion for uncovering hidden patterns and unearthing the unexpected led us to compute a correlation coefficient of 0.5017053, indicative of a definite association that is, dare I say, both eyebrow-raising and chuckle-inducing. Indeed, with a p-value less than 0.05, we were left with no choice but to herald this uncanny nexus as a genuine finding, much to our own surprise and bemusement.
This research aims to contribute to the gaiety of the statistical and cinematic domains by unearthing a connection that is as captivating as it is unconventional. We invite you to join us in this journey of discovery, where the whimsy of Hollywood intertwines with the earnestness of statistical investigation, resulting in a delightful and thought-provoking revelation. So, buckle up and prepare to unveil the "Role" in the silver screen Scooby Doo connection!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5017053, indicating a moderate positive relationship between the age of Academy Award Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. This finding suggests that as the age of the Best Actress winners increases, there is a tendency for more Scooby Doo direct-to-video films to hit the animated airwaves.
The r-squared value of 0.2517082 further indicates that approximately 25.17% of the variability in the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films can be explained by the age of the Best Actress winners. While this may not explain the entire mystery, it certainly sheds light on a noteworthy portion of it.
With a p-value of less than 0.05, we have statistically significant evidence to support the existence of this association. It appears that this unexpected connection is not simply the stuff of whimsical fancy, but a genuine statistical phenomenon that tickles the fancy and boggles the mind.
We present Figure 1, a scatterplot showcasing the robust correlation between the age of Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. Behold the captivating intertwining of these two seemingly disparate variables, creating a narrative that blends the elegance of Hollywood's leading ladies with the escapades of a mystery-solving mutt.
In conclusion, our study offers a lighthearted yet compelling addition to the world of statistical analysis and cinematic exploration. The silver screen and the animated realm have indeed conspired to weave a tale that, in the spirit of Scooby Doo himself, is a delightful blend of humor, mystery, and unexpected connections.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In light of these eyebrow-raising yet chuckle-inducing findings, it is clear that the age of Academy Award Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released share a connection as mysterious as the plots of the films themselves. As the age of the leading ladies gracefully ascends, so does the frequency of animated canine capers hitting the small screen - a curious correlation that tantalizingly piques the curiosity of both statistical sleuths and cinematic aficionados alike.

These results unveil a silver screen saga that dances between the realms of statistical oddity and whimsical serendipity, much like waltzing with a ghost in a haunted mansion. The r-squared value of 0.2517082 may not unlock the entire mystery, but it certainly shines a spotlight on a perplexing portion of it, not unlike the flashlight beam revealing the true identity of the "monster" in an episode of Scooby Doo.

With a p-value less than 0.05, we have more than a mere red herring on our hands - this correlation is the real deal. It seems that statistical significance has unmasked the unexpected connection between the elegant allure of Best Actress winners and the playful escapades of everyone's favorite crime-solving canine, not unlike the unmasking of a phantom perpetrator.

As we bid adieu to this captivating crossover of Hollywood glamour and animated hijinks, we assert with confidence that the next logical step in this farcical odyssey is to declare that no further research is warranted in this domain. The curtains have closed on this particular enigmatic spectacle, leaving behind a legacy that is as delightful as it is unconventional. Cheers to unraveling statistical mysteries with a dash of whimsy and a pinch of canine capers!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Age of Role: Unveiling the Silver Screen Scooby Doo Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Popular Culture and Film Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Age of Role: Unveiling the Silver Screen Scooby Doo Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Paranormal Entertainment Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Age of Role: Unveiling the Silver Screen Scooby Doo Connection with an abstract of This study investigates the peculiar yet intriguing relationship between the age of Academy Award Best Actress winners and the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released from 1998 to 2021. Utilizing data sourced from reputable platforms such as Wikipedia and IMDB, our research team embarked upon this whimsical exploration. The correlation coefficient of 0.5017053 and p < 0.05 uncovered a surprising association, raising eyebrows and leaving us both scratching our heads and chuckling. It appears that as the age of the Best Actress winners increases, so does the number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released. This research contributes a playful yet thought-provoking dimension to the world of cinematic analysis and statistical investigation.

ChatGPT:

Academy Award, Best Actress, winners, age, Scooby Doo, direct-to-video films, 1998-2021, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, cinematic analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Academy Award Best Actress Winner's Age
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Academy Award Best Actress Winner's Age

Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released
Detailed data title: Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released annually
Source: IMDB
See what else correlates with Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released

Correlation r = 0.5017053 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.2517082 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 25.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Academy Award Best Actress Winner's Age) over the 24 years from 1998 through 2021.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.012. 0.0124940997833564770000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.5 in 1.2% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 80 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 23 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 23 because we have two variables measured over a period of 24 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.12, 0.75 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Academy Award Best Actress Winner's Age (Age in years)342625333535283029613233452962224454262860455063
Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released (Films)111102121111213222223222




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([34,26,25,33,35,35,28,30,29,61,32,33,45,29,62,22,44,54,26,28,60,45,50,63,])
array_2 = np.array([1,1,1,1,0,2,1,2,1,1,1,1,2,1,3,2,2,2,2,2,3,2,2,2,])
array_1_name = "Academy Award Best Actress Winner's Age"
array_2_name = "Number of Scooby Doo direct-to-video films released"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 1386 · Black Variable ID: 528 · Red Variable ID: 182
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0