about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,384 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Annual US household spending on eggs and the second variable is Wipro's stock price (WIT).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As household spending on eggs shells out more dough, it eggs-cites consumers about breakfast options. This leads to a sunny-side up outlook on the poultry industry, causing an egg-ceptional demand for Wipro's technology solutions for egg producers. In other words, as egg expenditures crackle, Wipro's stock price is poaching for success! It's an eggs-traordinary connection that's nothing to yolk about!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that captures the essence of a Discovery magazine cover by illustrating the dynamics of Wipro's stock price growth alongside the stability of US household spending on eggs through a line graph. The graph should show Wipro's stock price steadily increasing over time, and superimposed on the same chart, a visual representation of a basket filled with eggs symbolizing the annual US household spending on eggs, which fluctuates slightly but remains relatively steady. The image should present a clear and visually compelling depiction of the two datasets without the use of any words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre Glitch art Vaporwave A Discovery magazine cover image A Discovery magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine a chart with a line graph showing the steady increase of Wipro's stock price over time. Superimposed on the same chart is an image of a basket filled with eggs, representing the annual US household spending on eggs, which fluctuates slightly but remains relatively steady.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a chart with a line graph showing the steady increase of Wipro's stock price over time. Superimposed on the same chart is an image of a basket filled with eggs, representing the annual US household spending on eggs, which fluctuates slightly but remains relatively steady. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that captures the essence of a Discovery magazine cover by illustrating the dynamics of Wipro's stock price growth alongside the stability of US household spending on eggs through a line graph. The graph should show Wipro's stock price steadily increasing over time, and superimposed on the same chart, a visual representation of a basket filled with eggs symbolizing the annual US household spending on eggs, which fluctuates slightly but remains relatively steady. The image should present a clear and visually compelling depiction of the two datasets without the use of any words or speech bubbles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Annual US household spending on eggs caused Wipro's stock price (WIT) to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Cracking the Code: The Egg-Citing Link Between Annual US Household Spending on Eggs and Wipro's Stock Price

Journal of Agricultural Eggs-ellence

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8522298 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Cracking the Code: The Egg-Citing Link Between Annual US Household Spending on Eggs and Wipro's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This egg-ceptional study aims to uncover the potential correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT). By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2002 to 2022. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8522298 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association. Our findings suggest that monitoring the movement of egg spending could provide egg-stra insight into the fluctuations of Wipro's stock price, offering a new perspective on market dynamics that is truly egg-citing.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cracking the Code: The Egg-Citing Link Between Annual US Household Spending on Eggs and Wipro's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This egg-ceptional study aims to uncover the potential correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT). By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2002 to 2022. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8522298 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association. Our findings suggest that monitoring the movement of egg spending could provide egg-stra insight into the fluctuations of Wipro's stock price, offering a new perspective on market dynamics that is truly egg-citing.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The seemingly unrelated worlds of eggs and stocks have long been viewed as, well, un-egg-sociable bedfellows. However, as we venture into the egg-spansive world of economics and market analysis, we have stumbled upon a cracking discovery. This study seeks to explore the egg-straordinary link between the annual spending habits of US households on eggs and the gyrations of Wipro's stock price, aiming to shed light on this unexpected correlation.

Eggs, renowned for their versatility in omelettes, baking, and the occasional egg-onomics lesson, have now found their way into our quest for financial insight. On the other hand, Wipro, a leading global information technology, consulting, and business process services company, has displayed its own brand of egg-celent performance in the stock market. Now, we ponder: could the movements of household egg expenditures truly be related to the egg-citing fluctuations in Wipro's stock price?

Strap in, dear reader, as we embark on this egg-speditious journey through an egg-stremely uncharted domain of economic analysis. Our findings promise to crack open new perspectives and nestle comfortably into the world of market prognostication. Let's not egg-nore this potential link any longer and get cracking on this egg-citing endeavor!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cracking the Code: The Egg-Citing Link Between Annual US Household Spending on Eggs and Wipro's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This egg-ceptional study aims to uncover the potential correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT). By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2002 to 2022. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8522298 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association. Our findings suggest that monitoring the movement of egg spending could provide egg-stra insight into the fluctuations of Wipro's stock price, offering a new perspective on market dynamics that is truly egg-citing.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The seemingly unrelated worlds of eggs and stocks have long been viewed as, well, un-egg-sociable bedfellows. However, as we venture into the egg-spansive world of economics and market analysis, we have stumbled upon a cracking discovery. This study seeks to explore the egg-straordinary link between the annual spending habits of US households on eggs and the gyrations of Wipro's stock price, aiming to shed light on this unexpected correlation.
Eggs, renowned for their versatility in omelettes, baking, and the occasional egg-onomics lesson, have now found their way into our quest for financial insight. On the other hand, Wipro, a leading global information technology, consulting, and business process services company, has displayed its own brand of egg-celent performance in the stock market. Now, we ponder: could the movements of household egg expenditures truly be related to the egg-citing fluctuations in Wipro's stock price?
Strap in, dear reader, as we embark on this egg-speditious journey through an egg-stremely uncharted domain of economic analysis. Our findings promise to crack open new perspectives and nestle comfortably into the world of market prognostication. Let's not egg-nore this potential link any longer and get cracking on this egg-citing endeavor!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Substantiating the unforeseen nexus between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price requires a thorough survey of existing literature, spanning from the conventional to the esoteric. Smith, in "Eggs: A Comprehensive Analysis," delves into the societal implications of egg consumption. Doe, in "The Hen Economy," presents a compelling argument for the economic importance of poultry products. Meanwhile, Jones, in "Stock Market Volatility: Patterns, Causes, and Predictions," explores the intricate dynamics of stock price movements. These foundational works pave the way for our investigation into the interplay between egg spending and stock price fluctuations.

Navigating the intricacies of consumer behavior, "Economic Perspectives on Eggs" by John Eggbert, provides a comprehensive overview of the factors influencing egg purchasing patterns. The insightful research in "Eggonomics: The Economics of Egg Production and Consumption" by A. Yolk sheds light on the broader economic implications of eggs in household budgets, setting the stage for our exploration.

Turning to fictional works that explore tangential themes, "The Egg and I" by Betty MacDonald offers a whimsical narrative steeped in the world of poultry farming and domestic life, weaving a humorous tale that mirrors the idiosyncrasies of consumer decision-making. In a similar vein, "The Golden Egg" by Donna Leon presents a mystery set against the backdrop of the Venetian culinary scene, imparting an unconventional take on the significance of eggs in everyday life.

On the cinematic front, "Runaway Bride" (1999) humorously mingles with the thematic undercurrents of our investigation, where eggs prominently feature in a memorable breakfast scene. Furthermore, the egg-centric escapades in "Cool Hand Luke" (1967) offer a cinematic foray into the often-unexpected outcomes of egg-related pursuits, hinting at the unforeseen connections in our very own research.

Thus, the amalgamation of scholarly inquiries, fictional narratives, and cinematic depictions fosters a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted implications surrounding the unassuming yet undeniably influential egg. This extensive and diverse literature sets the stage for our own egg-stravagant investigation into the correlation between egg spending and stock market movements.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cracking the Code: The Egg-Citing Link Between Annual US Household Spending on Eggs and Wipro's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This egg-ceptional study aims to uncover the potential correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT). By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2002 to 2022. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8522298 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association. Our findings suggest that monitoring the movement of egg spending could provide egg-stra insight into the fluctuations of Wipro's stock price, offering a new perspective on market dynamics that is truly egg-citing.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The seemingly unrelated worlds of eggs and stocks have long been viewed as, well, un-egg-sociable bedfellows. However, as we venture into the egg-spansive world of economics and market analysis, we have stumbled upon a cracking discovery. This study seeks to explore the egg-straordinary link between the annual spending habits of US households on eggs and the gyrations of Wipro's stock price, aiming to shed light on this unexpected correlation.
Eggs, renowned for their versatility in omelettes, baking, and the occasional egg-onomics lesson, have now found their way into our quest for financial insight. On the other hand, Wipro, a leading global information technology, consulting, and business process services company, has displayed its own brand of egg-celent performance in the stock market. Now, we ponder: could the movements of household egg expenditures truly be related to the egg-citing fluctuations in Wipro's stock price?
Strap in, dear reader, as we embark on this egg-speditious journey through an egg-stremely uncharted domain of economic analysis. Our findings promise to crack open new perspectives and nestle comfortably into the world of market prognostication. Let's not egg-nore this potential link any longer and get cracking on this egg-citing endeavor!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To crack the code on the egg-citing link between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price, our research team followed an egg-stremely rigorous methodology. First, we scrambled to aggregating the annual spending data on eggs from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which provided a comprehensive overview of egg-related expenditures by US households from 2002 to 2022. The data collection process was egg-stremely thorough, leaving no shell unturned in our pursuit of accurate and reliable information.

Next, we whisked our way into the world of stock prices, utilizing data from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to obtain the daily closing prices of Wipro's stock (WIT) over the same time period. The financial data was carefully sifted through, ensuring that no yolk escaped our attention as we sought to capture the nuances of Wipro's market performance.

With the egg-squisite datasets in hand, our analysis took on an egg-citing form, utilizing sophisticated statistical methods to unveil any potential correlations between household egg spending and Wipro's stock price movements. We employed a series of egg-stensively tested statistical techniques, including regression analysis, time series modeling, and co-integration tests, to crack open the possible relationship between these seemingly disconnected variables.

Moreover, our research team employed egg-strapolation techniques to forecast potential market trends based on the observed correlation between egg spending and Wipro's stock price. We aimed to provide market analysts with egg-stra guidance by leveraging our findings to make egg-stremely egg-curate predictions.

It is important to note that the nature of our approach was egg-sceptionally rigorous, as we strived to ensure that the findings were not merely based on a shell of statistical significance but on a solid foundation of robust inference.

In conclusion, our methodology sought to bring together the egg-straordinary realms of consumer behavior and market dynamics, utilizing an array of analytical tools and data sources to hatch new insights into the puzzling connection between egg spending and stock price movements.

Stay tuned for the egg-citing results in the subsequent sections as we crack open the egg-static findings from our comprehensive analysis!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8522298, r-squared of 0.7262956, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cracking the Code: The Egg-Citing Link Between Annual US Household Spending on Eggs and Wipro's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This egg-ceptional study aims to uncover the potential correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT). By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2002 to 2022. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8522298 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association. Our findings suggest that monitoring the movement of egg spending could provide egg-stra insight into the fluctuations of Wipro's stock price, offering a new perspective on market dynamics that is truly egg-citing.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The seemingly unrelated worlds of eggs and stocks have long been viewed as, well, un-egg-sociable bedfellows. However, as we venture into the egg-spansive world of economics and market analysis, we have stumbled upon a cracking discovery. This study seeks to explore the egg-straordinary link between the annual spending habits of US households on eggs and the gyrations of Wipro's stock price, aiming to shed light on this unexpected correlation.
Eggs, renowned for their versatility in omelettes, baking, and the occasional egg-onomics lesson, have now found their way into our quest for financial insight. On the other hand, Wipro, a leading global information technology, consulting, and business process services company, has displayed its own brand of egg-celent performance in the stock market. Now, we ponder: could the movements of household egg expenditures truly be related to the egg-citing fluctuations in Wipro's stock price?
Strap in, dear reader, as we embark on this egg-speditious journey through an egg-stremely uncharted domain of economic analysis. Our findings promise to crack open new perspectives and nestle comfortably into the world of market prognostication. Let's not egg-nore this potential link any longer and get cracking on this egg-citing endeavor!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT) uncovered an egg-ceptional correlation coefficient of 0.8522298. This coefficient indicates a strong positive association between the two variables, suggesting that as American households spend more on eggs, Wipro's stock price tends to experience some egg-straordinary movements.

The correlation coefficient of 0.8522298, along with an r-squared value of 0.7262956, demonstrates that a significant portion of the variability in Wipro's stock price can be explained by the fluctuations in annual egg spending. It appears that the two variables are not just co-egg-sisting in the annals of economic data but are rather egg-sessively intertwined.

In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 further emphasizes the statistical significance of this relationship. This suggests that the probability of observing such a strong correlation by chance alone is as rare as finding a golden egg in a chicken coop.

Furthermore, the scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 visually illustrates the strong positive correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price, providing a tangible representation of the egg-citing link that our analysis has uncovered.

In conclusion, our findings unveil a compelling association between the annual spending habits of domestic egg enthusiasts and the fluctuations in Wipro's stock price. This surprising discovery prompts us to not only egg-nore the possibilities of novel market indicators but also to embrace the egg-citing potential that lies within the unexplored intersections of consumer behavior and financial markets. As we delve further into this egg-quisitely intriguing nexus, we anticipate that additional research will cluckfully validate and potentially hatch further revelations in this egg-ceptional area of economic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Cracking the Code: The Egg-Citing Link Between Annual US Household Spending on Eggs and Wipro's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This egg-ceptional study aims to uncover the potential correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT). By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2002 to 2022. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8522298 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association. Our findings suggest that monitoring the movement of egg spending could provide egg-stra insight into the fluctuations of Wipro's stock price, offering a new perspective on market dynamics that is truly egg-citing.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Substantiating the unforeseen nexus between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price requires a thorough survey of existing literature, spanning from the conventional to the esoteric. Smith, in "Eggs: A Comprehensive Analysis," delves into the societal implications of egg consumption. Doe, in "The Hen Economy," presents a compelling argument for the economic importance of poultry products. Meanwhile, Jones, in "Stock Market Volatility: Patterns, Causes, and Predictions," explores the intricate dynamics of stock price movements. These foundational works pave the way for our investigation into the interplay between egg spending and stock price fluctuations.
Navigating the intricacies of consumer behavior, "Economic Perspectives on Eggs" by John Eggbert, provides a comprehensive overview of the factors influencing egg purchasing patterns. The insightful research in "Eggonomics: The Economics of Egg Production and Consumption" by A. Yolk sheds light on the broader economic implications of eggs in household budgets, setting the stage for our exploration.
Turning to fictional works that explore tangential themes, "The Egg and I" by Betty MacDonald offers a whimsical narrative steeped in the world of poultry farming and domestic life, weaving a humorous tale that mirrors the idiosyncrasies of consumer decision-making. In a similar vein, "The Golden Egg" by Donna Leon presents a mystery set against the backdrop of the Venetian culinary scene, imparting an unconventional take on the significance of eggs in everyday life.
On the cinematic front, "Runaway Bride" (1999) humorously mingles with the thematic undercurrents of our investigation, where eggs prominently feature in a memorable breakfast scene. Furthermore, the egg-centric escapades in "Cool Hand Luke" (1967) offer a cinematic foray into the often-unexpected outcomes of egg-related pursuits, hinting at the unforeseen connections in our very own research.
Thus, the amalgamation of scholarly inquiries, fictional narratives, and cinematic depictions fosters a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted implications surrounding the unassuming yet undeniably influential egg. This extensive and diverse literature sets the stage for our own egg-stravagant investigation into the correlation between egg spending and stock market movements.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT) uncovered an egg-ceptional correlation coefficient of 0.8522298. This coefficient indicates a strong positive association between the two variables, suggesting that as American households spend more on eggs, Wipro's stock price tends to experience some egg-straordinary movements.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8522298, along with an r-squared value of 0.7262956, demonstrates that a significant portion of the variability in Wipro's stock price can be explained by the fluctuations in annual egg spending. It appears that the two variables are not just co-egg-sisting in the annals of economic data but are rather egg-sessively intertwined.
In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 further emphasizes the statistical significance of this relationship. This suggests that the probability of observing such a strong correlation by chance alone is as rare as finding a golden egg in a chicken coop.
Furthermore, the scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 visually illustrates the strong positive correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price, providing a tangible representation of the egg-citing link that our analysis has uncovered.
In conclusion, our findings unveil a compelling association between the annual spending habits of domestic egg enthusiasts and the fluctuations in Wipro's stock price. This surprising discovery prompts us to not only egg-nore the possibilities of novel market indicators but also to embrace the egg-citing potential that lies within the unexplored intersections of consumer behavior and financial markets. As we delve further into this egg-quisitely intriguing nexus, we anticipate that additional research will cluckfully validate and potentially hatch further revelations in this egg-ceptional area of economic inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation into the egg-straordinary correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price has cracked open a new realm of inquiry within the realms of consumer behavior and financial markets. The egg-centric literature review, while seemingly light-hearted, provided deep insights and laid the foundation for our unegg-spected findings. We note with particular interest the fictional depictions of egg-related escapades, as they subtly hint at the unseen connections, much like the correlation we have unearthed in our own research.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8522298, as well as the egg-ceptionally low p-value, align with prior contributions to the understanding of market dynamics and consumer preferences. Smith's comprehensive analysis of egg consumption, though not initially intended as a piece on market correlations, has indirectly laid the groundwork for our understanding of the societal and economic implications of egg spending. Similarly, Betty MacDonald's "The Egg and I," known for its whimsical narrative, inadvertently mirrors the idiosyncrasies of consumer decision-making and offers a view into the complexities of household behavior that underpin our findings.

Furthermore, our results lend egg-stra credence to John Eggbert's "Economic Perspectives on Eggs," as we observe that the fluctuations in Wipro's stock price are indeed influenced by the factors impacting egg purchasing patterns. It seems that the unassuming egg, an oft-overlooked grocery item, has surreptitiously nestled its way into the intricate web of market movements, warranting further exploration in the field of consumer economics and investment strategies.

The unexpected statistical significance uncovered in our study clucks for further investigation into the egg-citing potential of egg spending as a market indicator. By embracing the egg-sessive interconnectedness of these variables, our research encourages a shift from the egg-nored to the egg-sploration of novel avenues for market predictions and economic analyses.

As we continue to delve into this egg-quisitely intriguing nexus, we anticipate that additional research will not only validate our findings but may also lay the groundwork for a new breed of economic indicators. The egg-ceptional nature of this correlation offers an egg-citing entry point for scholars and practitioners alike to scramble to grasp the unexplored intersections of consumer behavior and financial markets. Our study marks just the beginning of what promises to be an egg-emplary avenue of economic inquiry, imbued with the potential for a sunny-side-up understanding of market dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Cracking the Code: The Egg-Citing Link Between Annual US Household Spending on Eggs and Wipro's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This egg-ceptional study aims to uncover the potential correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT). By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2002 to 2022. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8522298 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association. Our findings suggest that monitoring the movement of egg spending could provide egg-stra insight into the fluctuations of Wipro's stock price, offering a new perspective on market dynamics that is truly egg-citing.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The seemingly unrelated worlds of eggs and stocks have long been viewed as, well, un-egg-sociable bedfellows. However, as we venture into the egg-spansive world of economics and market analysis, we have stumbled upon a cracking discovery. This study seeks to explore the egg-straordinary link between the annual spending habits of US households on eggs and the gyrations of Wipro's stock price, aiming to shed light on this unexpected correlation.
Eggs, renowned for their versatility in omelettes, baking, and the occasional egg-onomics lesson, have now found their way into our quest for financial insight. On the other hand, Wipro, a leading global information technology, consulting, and business process services company, has displayed its own brand of egg-celent performance in the stock market. Now, we ponder: could the movements of household egg expenditures truly be related to the egg-citing fluctuations in Wipro's stock price?
Strap in, dear reader, as we embark on this egg-speditious journey through an egg-stremely uncharted domain of economic analysis. Our findings promise to crack open new perspectives and nestle comfortably into the world of market prognostication. Let's not egg-nore this potential link any longer and get cracking on this egg-citing endeavor!

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT) uncovered an egg-ceptional correlation coefficient of 0.8522298. This coefficient indicates a strong positive association between the two variables, suggesting that as American households spend more on eggs, Wipro's stock price tends to experience some egg-straordinary movements.
The correlation coefficient of 0.8522298, along with an r-squared value of 0.7262956, demonstrates that a significant portion of the variability in Wipro's stock price can be explained by the fluctuations in annual egg spending. It appears that the two variables are not just co-egg-sisting in the annals of economic data but are rather egg-sessively intertwined.
In addition, the p-value of less than 0.01 further emphasizes the statistical significance of this relationship. This suggests that the probability of observing such a strong correlation by chance alone is as rare as finding a golden egg in a chicken coop.
Furthermore, the scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 visually illustrates the strong positive correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price, providing a tangible representation of the egg-citing link that our analysis has uncovered.
In conclusion, our findings unveil a compelling association between the annual spending habits of domestic egg enthusiasts and the fluctuations in Wipro's stock price. This surprising discovery prompts us to not only egg-nore the possibilities of novel market indicators but also to embrace the egg-citing potential that lies within the unexplored intersections of consumer behavior and financial markets. As we delve further into this egg-quisitely intriguing nexus, we anticipate that additional research will cluckfully validate and potentially hatch further revelations in this egg-ceptional area of economic inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In cracking the code between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT), our egg-straordinary findings have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.8522298, indicating a statistically significant association. Our analysis has egg-ceeded expectations, laying the groundwork for a new approach to market analysis — one that navigates the shells and yolks of consumer behavior to decipher stock price movements.

As our research cracks open this egg-citing nexus, we urge the financial community to embrace the possibilities of unearthing egg-squisite insights from rather egg-sotic sources. The potential for economics and culinary arts to converge in this egg-citing manner urges us to break free from traditional market prognostication and to approach economic analysis with an egg-spansive mindset.

However, with our egg-cellent findings in hand, we assert that no further research is egg-ssential in this egg-stremely specific area of inquiry. It's time to let this egg-ceptional discovery hatch and scramble into the future of market analysis.

But hey, who knows? Maybe the next breakthrough in economics will be as simple as understanding the egg-centric habits of American egg enthusiasts. Egg-citing times indeed!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Cracking the Code: The Egg-Citing Link Between Annual US Household Spending on Eggs and Wipro's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Agricultural Eggs-ellence


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Cracking the Code: The Egg-Citing Link Between Annual US Household Spending on Eggs and Wipro's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Eggcellent Financial Research and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Cracking the Code: The Egg-Citing Link Between Annual US Household Spending on Eggs and Wipro's Stock Price with an abstract of This egg-ceptional study aims to uncover the potential correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and Wipro's stock price (WIT). By leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team conducted a comprehensive analysis spanning the years 2002 to 2022. The results revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8522298 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association. Our findings suggest that monitoring the movement of egg spending could provide egg-stra insight into the fluctuations of Wipro's stock price, offering a new perspective on market dynamics that is truly egg-citing.

ChatGPT:

US household spending on eggs, annual spending on eggs, Wipro stock price, Wipro stock performance, correlation study, Bureau of Labor Statistics, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, market dynamics, statistical analysis, egg consumption trends, egg market analysis, egg industry data

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Annual US household spending on eggs
Detailed data title: Average annual household spend on eggs
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on eggs

Wipro's stock price (WIT)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Wipro (WIT) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Wipro's stock price (WIT)

Correlation r = 0.8522298 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7262956 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 72.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Wipro's stock price (WIT)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on eggs) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.4E-7. 0.0000009396603350007610000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 9.4E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,064,214 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.67, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Annual US household spending on eggs (Household spend)343742333743514446505356586356556458646887
Wipro's stock price (WIT) (Stock price)1.221.151.642.512.463.313.011.664.565.23.492.984.684.324.263.594.133.83.755.789.8




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([34,37,42,33,37,43,51,44,46,50,53,56,58,63,56,55,64,58,64,68,87,])
array_2 = np.array([1.22,1.15,1.64,2.51,2.46,3.31,3.01,1.66,4.56,5.2,3.49,2.98,4.68,4.32,4.26,3.59,4.13,3.8,3.75,5.78,9.8,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on eggs"
array_2_name = "Wipro's stock price (WIT)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 1384 · Black Variable ID: 19893 · Red Variable ID: 1851
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0