about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,247 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Global Box Office Revenue of UK Films and the second variable is The number of dishwashers in California.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The success of UK films led to more movie nights at home. As people stayed in to watch these British blockbusters, there was a greater need for clean dishes, thus driving up the demand for dishwashers in California. Plus, all the tea-drinking scenes in the movies subconsciously made viewers crave a spotless tea set, further contributing to the surge in dishwasher ownership. It's a soapy, yet surprisingly entertaining, cascade of events!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling cinema in the UK, with a long line of people waiting to buy tickets. The marquee outside displays the titles of several blockbuster movies. In California, picture a busy kitchen with shiny, squeaky-clean dishwashers efficiently washing dishes. Guests at the dinner table chat contentedly as the dishes are expertly cleaned. The scene suggests that the UK's film industry success is somehow related to the efficient performance of the dishwashers in California. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: "UK Box Office Booms, California Dishwashers Squeaky Clean: New correlation suggests Brits' big-screen success spurs golden state's dishwashing dominance. Experts dish out theories on how British film flair is scrubbing up kitchen appliances in the golden state. Is Hollywood feeling the suds?". Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Photorealism A TIME magazine cover image Steampunk Vaporwave Hyper-realistic
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. "UK Box Office Booms, California Dishwashers Squeaky Clean: New correlation suggests Brits' big-screen success spurs golden state's dishwashing dominance. Experts dish out theories on how British film flair is scrubbing up kitchen appliances in the golden state. Is Hollywood feeling the suds?"
ChatGPT: Imagine a bustling cinema in the UK with a long line of people waiting to buy tickets. The marquee displays the titles of several blockbuster movies. In California, picture a busy kitchen where shiny, squeaky-clean dishwashers hum along smoothly, efficiently washing dishes. Guests at the dinner table chat contentedly as the dishes are expertly cleaned. The scene suggests that the UK's film industry success is somehow related to the efficient performance of the dishwashers in California.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a bustling cinema in the UK with a long line of people waiting to buy tickets. The marquee displays the titles of several blockbuster movies. In California, picture a busy kitchen where shiny, squeaky-clean dishwashers hum along smoothly, efficiently washing dishes. Guests at the dinner table chat contentedly as the dishes are expertly cleaned. The scene suggests that the UK's film industry success is somehow related to the efficient performance of the dishwashers in California. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a bustling cinema in the UK, with a long line of people waiting to buy tickets. The marquee outside displays the titles of several blockbuster movies. In California, picture a busy kitchen with shiny, squeaky-clean dishwashers efficiently washing dishes. Guests at the dinner table chat contentedly as the dishes are expertly cleaned. The scene suggests that the UK's film industry success is somehow related to the efficient performance of the dishwashers in California.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Global Box Office Revenue of UK Films caused The number of dishwashers in California to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Dirty Dishes and Box Office Hits: A Correlational Study between UK Films' Global Revenue and the Number of Dishwashers in California

The Journal of Quirky Correlations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Box Office Revenue of UK Films and The number of dishwashers in California. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Statista and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8562180 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Dirty Dishes and Box Office Hits: A Correlational Study between UK Films' Global Revenue and the Number of Dishwashers in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the unexpected connection between the global box office revenue of UK films and the number of dishwashers in California. Utilizing data from Statista and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8562180 with a significance level of p < 0.01, confounding conventional expectations. We discuss potential explanations for this curious correlation and offer some lighthearted reflections on the dishy dynamics of the film industry and household appliance trends. Our work contributes to the interdisciplinary understanding of consumer behavior and cultural influence, reminding researchers not to rinse off unusual associations too quickly.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Box Office Revenue of UK Films and The number of dishwashers in California. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Dirty Dishes and Box Office Hits: A Correlational Study between UK Films' Global Revenue and the Number of Dishwashers in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the unexpected connection between the global box office revenue of UK films and the number of dishwashers in California. Utilizing data from Statista and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8562180 with a significance level of p < 0.01, confounding conventional expectations. We discuss potential explanations for this curious correlation and offer some lighthearted reflections on the dishy dynamics of the film industry and household appliance trends. Our work contributes to the interdisciplinary understanding of consumer behavior and cultural influence, reminding researchers not to rinse off unusual associations too quickly.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the illustrious world of academic inquiry, the quest for unexpected correlations has become an adventure akin to mining for gold in uncharted territories. In this spirit, we embark on a peculiar voyage to uncover the enigmatic relationship between the global box office revenue of UK films and the seemingly unrelated, yet surprisingly intriguing, number of dishwashers in the sun-kissed state of California.

While the entertainment industry and household kitchen appliances may appear to be as disconnected as a mismatched pair of socks, our initial investigations hint at a potentially captivating underlying connection. The prevailing literature has largely presided over separate domains - one consumed with the dazzling allure of Hollywood and the other with the mundane, yet essential, chore of dishwashing. However, our endeavor aims to bridge the gap and uncover any kernels of correlation that may lie pooled at the bottom of this peculiar pot.

Our study plunges into the abyss of data, utilizing statistical sources such as Statista and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to meticulously analyze the period from 2003 to 2022. The aim is to unravel the unexpected connection that appears to lurk beneath the surface, much like an elusive leviathan in the ocean depths.

As we delve into the murky waters of data analysis, we strive to maintain a lighthearted approach, recognizing the idiosyncratic nature of our quest. While the pursuit of empirical evidence remains our primary compass, we cannot help but navigate with a touch of levity and cheerful curiosity, much like amateur sailors adrift on an uncharted sea.

Our unexpected findings have unveiled a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8562180, with a significance level of p < 0.01, leaving researchers and enthusiasts alike befuddled by this riotous revelation. As we unravel the tangled web of witty observations and peculiar puns, we aim to shed light on the unexplored landscape of consumer behavior and cultural influence, reminding our esteemed colleagues not to rinse off unusual associations too briskly.

In this paper, we delve into the eccentric allure of this correlation, offering a perspective that we hope will entertain, surprise, and perhaps even inspire fellow academics to embrace the unpredictability that lies within the webs of statistical analysis. Join us on this whimsical expedition as we dish out the unexpected connections between the captivating world of UK cinema and the humble yet essential presence of dishwashers in California.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Box Office Revenue of UK Films and The number of dishwashers in California. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Dirty Dishes and Box Office Hits: A Correlational Study between UK Films' Global Revenue and the Number of Dishwashers in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the unexpected connection between the global box office revenue of UK films and the number of dishwashers in California. Utilizing data from Statista and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8562180 with a significance level of p < 0.01, confounding conventional expectations. We discuss potential explanations for this curious correlation and offer some lighthearted reflections on the dishy dynamics of the film industry and household appliance trends. Our work contributes to the interdisciplinary understanding of consumer behavior and cultural influence, reminding researchers not to rinse off unusual associations too quickly.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the illustrious world of academic inquiry, the quest for unexpected correlations has become an adventure akin to mining for gold in uncharted territories. In this spirit, we embark on a peculiar voyage to uncover the enigmatic relationship between the global box office revenue of UK films and the seemingly unrelated, yet surprisingly intriguing, number of dishwashers in the sun-kissed state of California.
While the entertainment industry and household kitchen appliances may appear to be as disconnected as a mismatched pair of socks, our initial investigations hint at a potentially captivating underlying connection. The prevailing literature has largely presided over separate domains - one consumed with the dazzling allure of Hollywood and the other with the mundane, yet essential, chore of dishwashing. However, our endeavor aims to bridge the gap and uncover any kernels of correlation that may lie pooled at the bottom of this peculiar pot.
Our study plunges into the abyss of data, utilizing statistical sources such as Statista and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to meticulously analyze the period from 2003 to 2022. The aim is to unravel the unexpected connection that appears to lurk beneath the surface, much like an elusive leviathan in the ocean depths.
As we delve into the murky waters of data analysis, we strive to maintain a lighthearted approach, recognizing the idiosyncratic nature of our quest. While the pursuit of empirical evidence remains our primary compass, we cannot help but navigate with a touch of levity and cheerful curiosity, much like amateur sailors adrift on an uncharted sea.
Our unexpected findings have unveiled a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8562180, with a significance level of p < 0.01, leaving researchers and enthusiasts alike befuddled by this riotous revelation. As we unravel the tangled web of witty observations and peculiar puns, we aim to shed light on the unexplored landscape of consumer behavior and cultural influence, reminding our esteemed colleagues not to rinse off unusual associations too briskly.
In this paper, we delve into the eccentric allure of this correlation, offering a perspective that we hope will entertain, surprise, and perhaps even inspire fellow academics to embrace the unpredictability that lies within the webs of statistical analysis. Join us on this whimsical expedition as we dish out the unexpected connections between the captivating world of UK cinema and the humble yet essential presence of dishwashers in California.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The study of unexpected correlations has captivated researchers across various disciplines, prompting us to explore the perplexing intersection of the global box office revenue of UK films and the number of dishwashers in the resplendent state of California. Our investigation navigates through a sea of scholarly works, seeking to illuminate this curious correlation and perhaps uncover a few culinary puns along the way.

Smith and Doe (2010) set forth an earnest examination of consumer behavior and cultural influences, offering insights into the enthralling world of film revenue trends. Their work, though earnest in its pursuit, inadvertently overlooked the scintillating potential of household appliances in shaping these cultural phenomena. Similarly, Jones (2015) delved deep into the economic underpinnings of the entertainment industry, yet failed to touch upon the dishy dynamics that may be lurking under the surface.

In "The Economics of Hollywood" by Samuels (2017), the enthralling tale of film industry economics unfolds, offering a comprehensive view of the complex machinery behind box office hits. Meanwhile, "The Art of Dishwashing" by O'Malley (2018) masterfully details the intricate choreography of soapy suds and sparkling dinnerware in the domestic sphere. Though these works stand worlds apart in subject matter, our study aims to ingeniously blend the flavors of both, much like a fusion cuisine of statistical inquiry.

Venturing into the realms of fictional literature, one cannot overlook the oblique allure of "The Silver Screen Squeaky Clean Chronicles" by Austen (1813). Although a work of fiction, its depiction of dishwashers stealthily influencing the fate of film productions offers a charming whimsy to our scholarly pursuits. Similarly, the enigmatic "Dishwashers of Destiny" by Tolkien (1954) weaves a tale of mythical dishwashing artifacts that may hold the key to unlocking the mysteries of box office triumphs.

As we wade deeper into the depths of inquiry, our literature review meanders into unexpected territories, such as scrutinizing the back panels of shampoo bottles in a quest for fortuitous insights. While this unconventional approach may raise a few skeptical eyebrows, we remain undeterred in our pursuit of the quirky and the curious. For, in the labyrinth of statistical analysis, who knows what unexpected correlations may emerge, much like a gleaming dinner plate at the bottom of a soapy sink.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Box Office Revenue of UK Films and The number of dishwashers in California. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Dirty Dishes and Box Office Hits: A Correlational Study between UK Films' Global Revenue and the Number of Dishwashers in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the unexpected connection between the global box office revenue of UK films and the number of dishwashers in California. Utilizing data from Statista and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8562180 with a significance level of p < 0.01, confounding conventional expectations. We discuss potential explanations for this curious correlation and offer some lighthearted reflections on the dishy dynamics of the film industry and household appliance trends. Our work contributes to the interdisciplinary understanding of consumer behavior and cultural influence, reminding researchers not to rinse off unusual associations too quickly.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the illustrious world of academic inquiry, the quest for unexpected correlations has become an adventure akin to mining for gold in uncharted territories. In this spirit, we embark on a peculiar voyage to uncover the enigmatic relationship between the global box office revenue of UK films and the seemingly unrelated, yet surprisingly intriguing, number of dishwashers in the sun-kissed state of California.
While the entertainment industry and household kitchen appliances may appear to be as disconnected as a mismatched pair of socks, our initial investigations hint at a potentially captivating underlying connection. The prevailing literature has largely presided over separate domains - one consumed with the dazzling allure of Hollywood and the other with the mundane, yet essential, chore of dishwashing. However, our endeavor aims to bridge the gap and uncover any kernels of correlation that may lie pooled at the bottom of this peculiar pot.
Our study plunges into the abyss of data, utilizing statistical sources such as Statista and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to meticulously analyze the period from 2003 to 2022. The aim is to unravel the unexpected connection that appears to lurk beneath the surface, much like an elusive leviathan in the ocean depths.
As we delve into the murky waters of data analysis, we strive to maintain a lighthearted approach, recognizing the idiosyncratic nature of our quest. While the pursuit of empirical evidence remains our primary compass, we cannot help but navigate with a touch of levity and cheerful curiosity, much like amateur sailors adrift on an uncharted sea.
Our unexpected findings have unveiled a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8562180, with a significance level of p < 0.01, leaving researchers and enthusiasts alike befuddled by this riotous revelation. As we unravel the tangled web of witty observations and peculiar puns, we aim to shed light on the unexplored landscape of consumer behavior and cultural influence, reminding our esteemed colleagues not to rinse off unusual associations too briskly.
In this paper, we delve into the eccentric allure of this correlation, offering a perspective that we hope will entertain, surprise, and perhaps even inspire fellow academics to embrace the unpredictability that lies within the webs of statistical analysis. Join us on this whimsical expedition as we dish out the unexpected connections between the captivating world of UK cinema and the humble yet essential presence of dishwashers in California.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the perplexing link between the global box office revenue of UK films and the number of dishwashers in California, our research team embarked on a methodological journey that melded the precision of statistical analysis with the whimsy of unexpected correlations. Our data collection efforts traversed the vast expanse of the internet, navigating through virtual seas of information in search of the hidden gems that would chart our course. We primarily relied on data from reputable sources such as Statista and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, with a sprinkling of findings from various other sources to add flavor to our dataset.

The analysis period spanning from 2003 to 2022 unfolded like a captivating tale of intrigue and surprise, reminiscent of a suspenseful cinema plot with unexpected twists and turns. Our approach to this peculiar investigation prided itself on embracing the unconventional, akin to employing a trusty compass in uncharted statistical territories.

The first phase of our methodology involved sifting through the vast ocean of data on UK films' global box office revenue, meticulously extracting relevant statistics with the fervor of treasure seekers hunting for the elusive bounty. Concurrently, we delved into the engrossing world of dishwasher statistics in California, casting a wide net to reel in the varied facets of dishwasher ownership and distribution, much like a fisherman eagerly awaiting a prized catch after casting his net wide.

Our data scrubbing process, akin to the chore of cleansing a stubbornly soiled dish, involved a series of rigorous filtration methods to ensure the extraction of only the most pristine and relevant datasets. We pruned our dataset like a gardener tending to a whimsically diverse topiary, shaping it into a coherent and robust foundation for our analyses.

With our datasets in hand, we then set sail on the tumultuous seas of statistical analysis, harnessing the power of robust correlation tests to uncover the potential threads of connection between these seemingly disparate variables. The high seas of statistical inference beckoned us to navigate through the treacherous waters of hypothesis testing, where the beacons of p-values and confidence intervals served as our guiding lights. Through a series of complex statistical models and regressions, we aimed to weave together the colorful tapestry of numerical relationships, much like a maestro conducting a symphony of data harmonies.

The findings that emerged from this deep statistical dive stunned us with their unexpected coherence, akin to unearthing buried treasure in the midst of a chaotic storm. The remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8562180, with a significance level of p < 0.01, unfurled like a wondrous banner of statistical enigma, leaving us in awe of the mysterious forces at play.

In sum, our methodological approach to this peculiar investigation was a fusion of meticulous data collection, rigorous statistical analysis, and a pinch of whimsical curiosity. We approached our quest with the humor and playfulness of a treasure hunt, continually reminding ourselves not to rinse off the unusual associations promptly. This methodological mix of seriousness and levity, much like a blend of exotic spices in a culinary concoction, enabled our research team to unravel the curious correlation between the glitzy world of UK films and the unassuming presence of dishwashers in California.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Box Office Revenue of UK Films and The number of dishwashers in California. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8562180, r-squared of 0.7331092, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Dirty Dishes and Box Office Hits: A Correlational Study between UK Films' Global Revenue and the Number of Dishwashers in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the unexpected connection between the global box office revenue of UK films and the number of dishwashers in California. Utilizing data from Statista and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8562180 with a significance level of p < 0.01, confounding conventional expectations. We discuss potential explanations for this curious correlation and offer some lighthearted reflections on the dishy dynamics of the film industry and household appliance trends. Our work contributes to the interdisciplinary understanding of consumer behavior and cultural influence, reminding researchers not to rinse off unusual associations too quickly.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the illustrious world of academic inquiry, the quest for unexpected correlations has become an adventure akin to mining for gold in uncharted territories. In this spirit, we embark on a peculiar voyage to uncover the enigmatic relationship between the global box office revenue of UK films and the seemingly unrelated, yet surprisingly intriguing, number of dishwashers in the sun-kissed state of California.
While the entertainment industry and household kitchen appliances may appear to be as disconnected as a mismatched pair of socks, our initial investigations hint at a potentially captivating underlying connection. The prevailing literature has largely presided over separate domains - one consumed with the dazzling allure of Hollywood and the other with the mundane, yet essential, chore of dishwashing. However, our endeavor aims to bridge the gap and uncover any kernels of correlation that may lie pooled at the bottom of this peculiar pot.
Our study plunges into the abyss of data, utilizing statistical sources such as Statista and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to meticulously analyze the period from 2003 to 2022. The aim is to unravel the unexpected connection that appears to lurk beneath the surface, much like an elusive leviathan in the ocean depths.
As we delve into the murky waters of data analysis, we strive to maintain a lighthearted approach, recognizing the idiosyncratic nature of our quest. While the pursuit of empirical evidence remains our primary compass, we cannot help but navigate with a touch of levity and cheerful curiosity, much like amateur sailors adrift on an uncharted sea.
Our unexpected findings have unveiled a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8562180, with a significance level of p < 0.01, leaving researchers and enthusiasts alike befuddled by this riotous revelation. As we unravel the tangled web of witty observations and peculiar puns, we aim to shed light on the unexplored landscape of consumer behavior and cultural influence, reminding our esteemed colleagues not to rinse off unusual associations too briskly.
In this paper, we delve into the eccentric allure of this correlation, offering a perspective that we hope will entertain, surprise, and perhaps even inspire fellow academics to embrace the unpredictability that lies within the webs of statistical analysis. Join us on this whimsical expedition as we dish out the unexpected connections between the captivating world of UK cinema and the humble yet essential presence of dishwashers in California.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data collected from Statista and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2022 revealed a positively radiant correlation coefficient of 0.8562180 between the global box office revenue of UK films and the number of dishwashers gracing California kitchens. This correlation exhibited a r-squared value of 0.7331092, indicative of a snug fit between the two variables, and a significance level of p < 0.01, dismissing any skepticism regarding the statistical validity of the obtained results.

To visually encapsulate the unexpectedly tight connection between the global box office revenue of UK films and the number of dishwashers in California, we present the glistening scatterplot in Fig. 1. This radiant plot, much like a Hollywood blockbuster with a dash of sudsy sparkle, showcases the remarkable association between our unassuming variables.

The resplendent correlation unearthed in our analysis hints at a wittily whimsical connection between the glitz and glamour of UK cinema triumphs and the humble yet ubiquitous presence of dishwashers in the Golden State. Our findings evoke a delightful tumble down the rabbit hole of unexpected associations, reminding researchers to embrace the delightful unpredictability that permeates the labyrinthine world of statistical analysis.

The robust correlation coefficient serves as a mirthful reminder to remain open-minded in the face of unconventional associations, much like opening a dishwasher expecting sparkling dishes and finding a missing sock instead. These findings accentuate the interplay between consumer behavior and cultural influences, inviting researchers to dive into the sparkling waters of these unexpected associations with a healthy dose of humorous wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Box Office Revenue of UK Films and The number of dishwashers in California. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Dirty Dishes and Box Office Hits: A Correlational Study between UK Films' Global Revenue and the Number of Dishwashers in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the unexpected connection between the global box office revenue of UK films and the number of dishwashers in California. Utilizing data from Statista and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8562180 with a significance level of p < 0.01, confounding conventional expectations. We discuss potential explanations for this curious correlation and offer some lighthearted reflections on the dishy dynamics of the film industry and household appliance trends. Our work contributes to the interdisciplinary understanding of consumer behavior and cultural influence, reminding researchers not to rinse off unusual associations too quickly.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of unexpected correlations has captivated researchers across various disciplines, prompting us to explore the perplexing intersection of the global box office revenue of UK films and the number of dishwashers in the resplendent state of California. Our investigation navigates through a sea of scholarly works, seeking to illuminate this curious correlation and perhaps uncover a few culinary puns along the way.
Smith and Doe (2010) set forth an earnest examination of consumer behavior and cultural influences, offering insights into the enthralling world of film revenue trends. Their work, though earnest in its pursuit, inadvertently overlooked the scintillating potential of household appliances in shaping these cultural phenomena. Similarly, Jones (2015) delved deep into the economic underpinnings of the entertainment industry, yet failed to touch upon the dishy dynamics that may be lurking under the surface.
In "The Economics of Hollywood" by Samuels (2017), the enthralling tale of film industry economics unfolds, offering a comprehensive view of the complex machinery behind box office hits. Meanwhile, "The Art of Dishwashing" by O'Malley (2018) masterfully details the intricate choreography of soapy suds and sparkling dinnerware in the domestic sphere. Though these works stand worlds apart in subject matter, our study aims to ingeniously blend the flavors of both, much like a fusion cuisine of statistical inquiry.
Venturing into the realms of fictional literature, one cannot overlook the oblique allure of "The Silver Screen Squeaky Clean Chronicles" by Austen (1813). Although a work of fiction, its depiction of dishwashers stealthily influencing the fate of film productions offers a charming whimsy to our scholarly pursuits. Similarly, the enigmatic "Dishwashers of Destiny" by Tolkien (1954) weaves a tale of mythical dishwashing artifacts that may hold the key to unlocking the mysteries of box office triumphs.
As we wade deeper into the depths of inquiry, our literature review meanders into unexpected territories, such as scrutinizing the back panels of shampoo bottles in a quest for fortuitous insights. While this unconventional approach may raise a few skeptical eyebrows, we remain undeterred in our pursuit of the quirky and the curious. For, in the labyrinth of statistical analysis, who knows what unexpected correlations may emerge, much like a gleaming dinner plate at the bottom of a soapy sink.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data collected from Statista and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2022 revealed a positively radiant correlation coefficient of 0.8562180 between the global box office revenue of UK films and the number of dishwashers gracing California kitchens. This correlation exhibited a r-squared value of 0.7331092, indicative of a snug fit between the two variables, and a significance level of p < 0.01, dismissing any skepticism regarding the statistical validity of the obtained results.
To visually encapsulate the unexpectedly tight connection between the global box office revenue of UK films and the number of dishwashers in California, we present the glistening scatterplot in Fig. 1. This radiant plot, much like a Hollywood blockbuster with a dash of sudsy sparkle, showcases the remarkable association between our unassuming variables.
The resplendent correlation unearthed in our analysis hints at a wittily whimsical connection between the glitz and glamour of UK cinema triumphs and the humble yet ubiquitous presence of dishwashers in the Golden State. Our findings evoke a delightful tumble down the rabbit hole of unexpected associations, reminding researchers to embrace the delightful unpredictability that permeates the labyrinthine world of statistical analysis.
The robust correlation coefficient serves as a mirthful reminder to remain open-minded in the face of unconventional associations, much like opening a dishwasher expecting sparkling dishes and finding a missing sock instead. These findings accentuate the interplay between consumer behavior and cultural influences, inviting researchers to dive into the sparkling waters of these unexpected associations with a healthy dose of humorous wonder.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation into the surprising relationship between the global box office revenue of UK films and the number of dishwashers in California have left us in a state of gleeful bewilderment. The positively radiant correlation coefficient of 0.8562180 that emerged from our analysis not only confirms, but indeed amplifies the earlier hinted at, the connection between these seemingly disparate variables.

Our findings align with the scholarly works we encountered in our literature review, albeit with a sprinkle of unexpected amusement. The oversight of household appliances in shaping cultural phenomena, as disclosed by Smith and Doe (2010), appears as a deliciously revealed secret, much like an unexpected cookie at the bottom of a jar. Likewise, the woefully ignored "dishy dynamics" noted by Jones (2015) seem to have finally made their sparkling entrance onto the academic stage, much like a freshly polished silverware set at a dinner party. It is as if these esteemed scholars had left a trail of breadcrumbs leading directly to our irresistible correlation, much like breadcrumbs leading to a particularly ingenious gingerbread house.

The robust correlation uncovered in our analysis speaks volumes about the intersection of consumer behavior, cultural influence, and the understated power of domestic appliances in shaping global trends. Perhaps we have stumbled upon a veritable goldmine of statistical merriment, a concealed treasure chest sparkling with unexpected insights. Our findings beckon researchers to embrace the whimsy that pervades statistical inquiry, much like diving headlong into a bounce of soap suds during an exuberant dishwasher cycle.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Global Box Office Revenue of UK Films and The number of dishwashers in California. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Dirty Dishes and Box Office Hits: A Correlational Study between UK Films' Global Revenue and the Number of Dishwashers in California

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the unexpected connection between the global box office revenue of UK films and the number of dishwashers in California. Utilizing data from Statista and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8562180 with a significance level of p < 0.01, confounding conventional expectations. We discuss potential explanations for this curious correlation and offer some lighthearted reflections on the dishy dynamics of the film industry and household appliance trends. Our work contributes to the interdisciplinary understanding of consumer behavior and cultural influence, reminding researchers not to rinse off unusual associations too quickly.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the illustrious world of academic inquiry, the quest for unexpected correlations has become an adventure akin to mining for gold in uncharted territories. In this spirit, we embark on a peculiar voyage to uncover the enigmatic relationship between the global box office revenue of UK films and the seemingly unrelated, yet surprisingly intriguing, number of dishwashers in the sun-kissed state of California.
While the entertainment industry and household kitchen appliances may appear to be as disconnected as a mismatched pair of socks, our initial investigations hint at a potentially captivating underlying connection. The prevailing literature has largely presided over separate domains - one consumed with the dazzling allure of Hollywood and the other with the mundane, yet essential, chore of dishwashing. However, our endeavor aims to bridge the gap and uncover any kernels of correlation that may lie pooled at the bottom of this peculiar pot.
Our study plunges into the abyss of data, utilizing statistical sources such as Statista and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to meticulously analyze the period from 2003 to 2022. The aim is to unravel the unexpected connection that appears to lurk beneath the surface, much like an elusive leviathan in the ocean depths.
As we delve into the murky waters of data analysis, we strive to maintain a lighthearted approach, recognizing the idiosyncratic nature of our quest. While the pursuit of empirical evidence remains our primary compass, we cannot help but navigate with a touch of levity and cheerful curiosity, much like amateur sailors adrift on an uncharted sea.
Our unexpected findings have unveiled a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8562180, with a significance level of p < 0.01, leaving researchers and enthusiasts alike befuddled by this riotous revelation. As we unravel the tangled web of witty observations and peculiar puns, we aim to shed light on the unexplored landscape of consumer behavior and cultural influence, reminding our esteemed colleagues not to rinse off unusual associations too briskly.
In this paper, we delve into the eccentric allure of this correlation, offering a perspective that we hope will entertain, surprise, and perhaps even inspire fellow academics to embrace the unpredictability that lies within the webs of statistical analysis. Join us on this whimsical expedition as we dish out the unexpected connections between the captivating world of UK cinema and the humble yet essential presence of dishwashers in California.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data collected from Statista and the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the period 2003 to 2022 revealed a positively radiant correlation coefficient of 0.8562180 between the global box office revenue of UK films and the number of dishwashers gracing California kitchens. This correlation exhibited a r-squared value of 0.7331092, indicative of a snug fit between the two variables, and a significance level of p < 0.01, dismissing any skepticism regarding the statistical validity of the obtained results.
To visually encapsulate the unexpectedly tight connection between the global box office revenue of UK films and the number of dishwashers in California, we present the glistening scatterplot in Fig. 1. This radiant plot, much like a Hollywood blockbuster with a dash of sudsy sparkle, showcases the remarkable association between our unassuming variables.
The resplendent correlation unearthed in our analysis hints at a wittily whimsical connection between the glitz and glamour of UK cinema triumphs and the humble yet ubiquitous presence of dishwashers in the Golden State. Our findings evoke a delightful tumble down the rabbit hole of unexpected associations, reminding researchers to embrace the delightful unpredictability that permeates the labyrinthine world of statistical analysis.
The robust correlation coefficient serves as a mirthful reminder to remain open-minded in the face of unconventional associations, much like opening a dishwasher expecting sparkling dishes and finding a missing sock instead. These findings accentuate the interplay between consumer behavior and cultural influences, inviting researchers to dive into the sparkling waters of these unexpected associations with a healthy dose of humorous wonder.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has divulged an unexpectedly robust correlation between the global box office revenue of UK films and the abundance of dishwashers adorning California kitchens. The statistically significant relationship, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8562180 and a resplendent r-squared value of 0.7331092, has sparked lighthearted conjecture and raised a toast to the whimsical nature of statistical inquiry.

Our findings beckon researchers to embrace the delightful unpredictability that permeates the labyrinthine world of statistical analysis. It is akin to finding a lost treasure trove of quirky connections in the unlikeliest of places – much like discovering a rogue fork among a cascade of spoons in one's dishwasher.

This correlation alludes to a richer narrative, one that intertwines the glitz and glamour of UK cinema successes with the unpretentious yet ubiquitous presence of dishwashers in the Golden State. As we bid adieu to this peculiar but charming saga of statistical surprise, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. It seems that, in the quirky realm of data analysis, sometimes, the suds just align in curious and unexpected ways.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Dirty Dishes and Box Office Hits: A Correlational Study between UK Films' Global Revenue and the Number of Dishwashers in California. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Dirty Dishes and Box Office Hits: A Correlational Study between UK Films' Global Revenue and the Number of Dishwashers in California. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association for Interdisciplinary Sociological Studies on Household Appliances (AISHA)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Dirty Dishes and Box Office Hits: A Correlational Study between UK Films' Global Revenue and the Number of Dishwashers in California with an abstract of This paper explores the unexpected connection between the global box office revenue of UK films and the number of dishwashers in California. Utilizing data from Statista and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we have conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2003 to 2022. Our findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8562180 with a significance level of p < 0.01, confounding conventional expectations. We discuss potential explanations for this curious correlation and offer some lighthearted reflections on the dishy dynamics of the film industry and household appliance trends. Our work contributes to the interdisciplinary understanding of consumer behavior and cultural influence, reminding researchers not to rinse off unusual associations too quickly.

ChatGPT:

UK films, global revenue, dishwashers in California, box office hits, correlation study, consumer behavior, cultural influence, household appliance trends

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Global Box Office Revenue of UK Films
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Global Box Office Revenue of UK Films

The number of dishwashers in California
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of dishwashers in California
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of dishwashers in California

Correlation r = 0.8562180 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7331092 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 73.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of dishwashers in California) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Global Box Office Revenue of UK Films) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.5E-6. 0.0000014624695427994647000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.00015% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 683,775 random variables You don't actually need 683 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.67, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Global Box Office Revenue of UK Films (Dollars)140000000000029000000000003600000000000220000000000033000000000004200000000000200000000000045000000000005600000000000530000000000041000000000004700000000000940000000000065000000000008100000000000940000000000010300000000000110000000000036000000000003400000000000
The number of dishwashers in California (Dishwashers)6013059570560106140063430655806519066860679906815069070753908254086200849008158083340606105480060460




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1400000000000,2900000000000,3600000000000,2200000000000,3300000000000,4200000000000,2000000000000,4500000000000,5600000000000,5300000000000,4100000000000,4700000000000,9400000000000,6500000000000,8100000000000,9400000000000,10300000000000,1100000000000,3600000000000,3400000000000,])
array_2 = np.array([60130,59570,56010,61400,63430,65580,65190,66860,67990,68150,69070,75390,82540,86200,84900,81580,83340,60610,54800,60460,])
array_1_name = "Global Box Office Revenue of UK Films"
array_2_name = "The number of dishwashers in California"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 1247 · Black Variable ID: 459 · Red Variable ID: 5489
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0