about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,177 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Reid and the second variable is Total number of live births in Australia.  The chart goes from 1975 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Every time someone hears the name Reid, they inadvertently perform a secret fertility dance, leading to a nationwide baby boom. This contagious urge to procreate sparked a positive feedback loop, with each new Reid bringing about even more births in a never-ending cycle of baby-making jubilation. It seems that the real Reid was not a person, but a fertility deity in disguise, spreading joy and diapers wherever his name was spoken.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a cute 2D animation of a bustling park scene on a sunny day. You notice a group of people chatting and mingling, with occasional introductions from someone named Reid. Each time Reid introduces themselves, a nearby group of people suddenly beams with excitement. In the background, a stork is flying overhead, delivering a bundle of joy to a happy family, symbolizing the surge in live births in Australia due to this unusual baby-naming Pavlovian response. The animation should capture the joyous atmosphere and the playful interaction between the characters. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: The increase in popularity of the first name Reid caused a surge in total number of live births in Australia because every time someone named Reid introduces themselves, it triggers a subconscious urge in others to procreate in hopes of creating a future Reid. It's like a baby-naming Pavlovian response.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Art nouveau Brutalism Scalar art Cute 2D animation Cyber folk
ChatGPT: Cute 2D animation

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. The increase in popularity of the first name Reid caused a surge in total number of live births in Australia because every time someone named Reid introduces themselves, it triggers a subconscious urge in others to procreate in hopes of creating a future Reid. It's like a baby-naming Pavlovian response.
ChatGPT: Imagine a bustling park on a sunny day, where many people are chatting and mingling. You notice that each time someone named Reid introduces themselves, a group of people nearby suddenly start beaming with excitement. In the background, you see a stork flying overhead, delivering a bundle of joy to a happy family, symbolizing the surge in the total number of live births in Australia due to this unusual baby-naming Pavlovian response.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute 2D animation ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a bustling park on a sunny day, where many people are chatting and mingling. You notice that each time someone named Reid introduces themselves, a group of people nearby suddenly start beaming with excitement. In the background, you see a stork flying overhead, delivering a bundle of joy to a happy family, symbolizing the surge in the total number of live births in Australia due to this unusual baby-naming Pavlovian response. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a cute 2D animation of a bustling park scene on a sunny day. You notice a group of people chatting and mingling, with occasional introductions from someone named Reid. Each time Reid introduces themselves, a nearby group of people suddenly beams with excitement. In the background, a stork is flying overhead, delivering a bundle of joy to a happy family, symbolizing the surge in live births in Australia due to this unusual baby-naming Pavlovian response. The animation should capture the joyous atmosphere and the playful interaction between the characters.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Reid caused Total number of live births in Australia to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Reid-iculous Popularity: A Statistical Analysis of the Name Reid and Its Influence on Total Births Down Under

The Journal of Comical Sociological Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reid and Total number of live births in Australia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9552605 and p < 0.01 for 1975 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Reid-iculous Popularity: A Statistical Analysis of the Name Reid and Its Influence on Total Births Down Under

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the whimsical world of first names and their inexplicable influence on birth trends. While most research delves into serious matters, we decided to crack open the vault of curiosity and tackle the age-old question: does the popularity of the name Reid affect the total number of live births in Australia? Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning from 1975 to 2022. The findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9552605, eliciting a collective "woah" from our research team. With p < 0.01, we can confidently say that the popularity of the name Reid is more than just a coincidence - it's un-be-"Reid"-able. So, if you're considering naming your child Reid, rest assured that you may inadvertently contribute to a statistical spike in live births.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reid and Total number of live births in Australia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Reid-iculous Popularity: A Statistical Analysis of the Name Reid and Its Influence on Total Births Down Under

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the whimsical world of first names and their inexplicable influence on birth trends. While most research delves into serious matters, we decided to crack open the vault of curiosity and tackle the age-old question: does the popularity of the name Reid affect the total number of live births in Australia? Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning from 1975 to 2022. The findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9552605, eliciting a collective "woah" from our research team. With p < 0.01, we can confidently say that the popularity of the name Reid is more than just a coincidence - it's un-be-"Reid"-able. So, if you're considering naming your child Reid, rest assured that you may inadvertently contribute to a statistical spike in live births.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
**[[INTRODUCTION]]**

The relationship between first names and birth trends has long been a source of bewilderment and amusement. While the study of naming conventions may not seem like the most serious academic pursuit, it opens a window into the quirky and unpredictable nature of human behavior. In this paper, we delve into the enigmatic realm of nomenclature to explore the impact of the name Reid on the total number of live births in the land Down Under.

As researchers, we are accustomed to tackling weighty matters, but occasionally, we decide to indulge in some lighthearted statistical tomfoolery. After all, the world of data analysis could use a sprinkle of whimsy every now and then.

The name Reid, with its Scottish origins meaning "red-haired," has garnered a following for its distinctive charm and undeniable appeal. It is a name that encapsulates both strength and charisma, a bit like a superhero name, but without the spandex and cape.

Amidst the sea of names, Reid has managed to carve out its own niche, inviting us to ponder the peculiar influence it may have on the ebb and flow of birth rates. With its consonant-packed brevity, this moniker allures us into the statistical labyrinth, where we embark on an odyssey to unravel the mysterious connection between a name and the arrival of new bundles of joy.

Pondering the potential sway of a name on birth statistics prompts both head-scratching and delight. It's a bit like a statistical magic show – we're not sure how it works, but we eagerly anticipate being amazed.

In this paper, we endeavor to shed light on the Reid-iculous enigma, unearthing insights that may tickle the fancy of both data aficionados and those with a penchant for the absurd. Prepare to embark on a statistical adventure that may just leave you "Reid-y" to reconsider the impact of a name on the world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reid and Total number of live births in Australia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Reid-iculous Popularity: A Statistical Analysis of the Name Reid and Its Influence on Total Births Down Under

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the whimsical world of first names and their inexplicable influence on birth trends. While most research delves into serious matters, we decided to crack open the vault of curiosity and tackle the age-old question: does the popularity of the name Reid affect the total number of live births in Australia? Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning from 1975 to 2022. The findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9552605, eliciting a collective "woah" from our research team. With p < 0.01, we can confidently say that the popularity of the name Reid is more than just a coincidence - it's un-be-"Reid"-able. So, if you're considering naming your child Reid, rest assured that you may inadvertently contribute to a statistical spike in live births.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between first names and birth trends has long been a source of bewilderment and amusement. While the study of naming conventions may not seem like the most serious academic pursuit, it opens a window into the quirky and unpredictable nature of human behavior. In this paper, we delve into the enigmatic realm of nomenclature to explore the impact of the name Reid on the total number of live births in the land Down Under.
As researchers, we are accustomed to tackling weighty matters, but occasionally, we decide to indulge in some lighthearted statistical tomfoolery. After all, the world of data analysis could use a sprinkle of whimsy every now and then.
The name Reid, with its Scottish origins meaning "red-haired," has garnered a following for its distinctive charm and undeniable appeal. It is a name that encapsulates both strength and charisma, a bit like a superhero name, but without the spandex and cape.
Amidst the sea of names, Reid has managed to carve out its own niche, inviting us to ponder the peculiar influence it may have on the ebb and flow of birth rates. With its consonant-packed brevity, this moniker allures us into the statistical labyrinth, where we embark on an odyssey to unravel the mysterious connection between a name and the arrival of new bundles of joy.
Pondering the potential sway of a name on birth statistics prompts both head-scratching and delight. It's a bit like a statistical magic show – we're not sure how it works, but we eagerly anticipate being amazed.
In this paper, we endeavor to shed light on the Reid-iculous enigma, unearthing insights that may tickle the fancy of both data aficionados and those with a penchant for the absurd. Prepare to embark on a statistical adventure that may just leave you "Reid-y" to reconsider the impact of a name on the world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of the influence of first names on birth trends has been a topic of fascination and intrigue among researchers and enthusiasts alike. Smith and Doe (2010) conducted a comprehensive study on the relationship between first names and demographic shifts, providing a solid foundation for subsequent investigations in this peculiar field. Similarly, Jones et al. (2015) delved into the cultural significance of names and their potential impact on societal phenomena.

However, as we venture further into the realm of name-related statistical analysis, we find ourselves in need of a lighthearted detour. Let's journey through a variety of sources that will illuminate the whimsical and often "Reid"-iculous nature of our current pursuit.

In "The Name Book: Over 10,000 Names, Their Meanings, Origins, and Spiritual Significance" by Dorothy Astoria, we find a treasure trove of name-related insights, albeit without specific mention of the name Reid. Nevertheless, the book serves as a reminder of the vast and intricate tapestry of names that shape human experiences and one's life trajectory.

On the fictional side, "Reid's Runaway Bride" by Lila Mathews and "The Enigma of Reid" by Cassandra Blair may not offer direct statistical insights, but their titles certainly evoke a sense of intrigue and enigma surrounding the name Reid. These books may not contribute to empirical research, but they remind us of the name's romantic and mysterious connotations.

In the age of social media, it's essential to consider the musings and observations of the public. A Reddit thread titled "The Reid Effect: Myth or Statistical Reality?" garnered spirited discussions on the potential correlation between the name Reid and birth rates. While not a scholarly source, the thread provides a glimpse into the public's curiosity about the influence of names on demographic phenomena.

As we navigate through this whimsical exploration, it becomes evident that the intersection of names and birth trends offers a playful yet thought-provoking avenue for inquiry. Let us embrace the joy of statistical tomfoolery and emerge enlightened, if not slightly amused, by the curious connection between a name and the birth of new life.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reid and Total number of live births in Australia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia . You used data from 1975 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Reid-iculous Popularity: A Statistical Analysis of the Name Reid and Its Influence on Total Births Down Under

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the whimsical world of first names and their inexplicable influence on birth trends. While most research delves into serious matters, we decided to crack open the vault of curiosity and tackle the age-old question: does the popularity of the name Reid affect the total number of live births in Australia? Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning from 1975 to 2022. The findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9552605, eliciting a collective "woah" from our research team. With p < 0.01, we can confidently say that the popularity of the name Reid is more than just a coincidence - it's un-be-"Reid"-able. So, if you're considering naming your child Reid, rest assured that you may inadvertently contribute to a statistical spike in live births.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between first names and birth trends has long been a source of bewilderment and amusement. While the study of naming conventions may not seem like the most serious academic pursuit, it opens a window into the quirky and unpredictable nature of human behavior. In this paper, we delve into the enigmatic realm of nomenclature to explore the impact of the name Reid on the total number of live births in the land Down Under.
As researchers, we are accustomed to tackling weighty matters, but occasionally, we decide to indulge in some lighthearted statistical tomfoolery. After all, the world of data analysis could use a sprinkle of whimsy every now and then.
The name Reid, with its Scottish origins meaning "red-haired," has garnered a following for its distinctive charm and undeniable appeal. It is a name that encapsulates both strength and charisma, a bit like a superhero name, but without the spandex and cape.
Amidst the sea of names, Reid has managed to carve out its own niche, inviting us to ponder the peculiar influence it may have on the ebb and flow of birth rates. With its consonant-packed brevity, this moniker allures us into the statistical labyrinth, where we embark on an odyssey to unravel the mysterious connection between a name and the arrival of new bundles of joy.
Pondering the potential sway of a name on birth statistics prompts both head-scratching and delight. It's a bit like a statistical magic show – we're not sure how it works, but we eagerly anticipate being amazed.
In this paper, we endeavor to shed light on the Reid-iculous enigma, unearthing insights that may tickle the fancy of both data aficionados and those with a penchant for the absurd. Prepare to embark on a statistical adventure that may just leave you "Reid-y" to reconsider the impact of a name on the world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

**[[METHODOLOGY]]**

To uncover the mysterious influence of the name Reid on the total number of live births in Australia, we embarked on a statistical escapade that would make even the most stoic of researchers raise an eyebrow. Our research team, armed with an ample supply of caffeinated beverages and a dogged determination to solve the whimsical conundrum at hand, devised a methodology that would both dazzle and entertain.

**Data Collection**

The cornerstone of our investigation involved the collection of data from reputable sources, which included the US Social Security Administration and everyone's favorite fount of knowledge, Wikipedia. We meticulously scoured these archives, extracting information on the popularity of the name Reid as well as the total live births in Australia from 1975 to 2022. Our data collection process was conducted with the precision of a synchronized swimming routine, ensuring that no statistical beat was missed.

**Statistical Analysis**

With our trove of data in hand, we engaged in a series of statistical acrobatics that would impress even the most mathematically inclined circus performer. Utilizing the beloved tool of statisticians everywhere, the trusty spreadsheet, we calculated correlation coefficients, plotted graphs, and performed regression analyses to uncover any potential associations between the popularity of the name Reid and the total number of live births in Australia.

In addition to the rigorous number-crunching, we also invoked the spirit of the ancient art of divination, also known as "eyeballing the data." This time-honored practice involved peering intensely at charts and tables, occasionally nodding sagely, and muttering phrases like "aha, there's something fishy here." Rest assured, our statistical divination was complemented by robust analytical methods to ensure the reliability of our findings.

**Control Variables**

To maintain the integrity of our investigation, we also took into account various control variables that could potentially confound our results. Factors such as economic trends, societal shifts, and the prevalence of whimsical baby name trends were carefully considered in our analysis. While we couldn't predict the next viral baby name craze, we made valiant attempts to account for the unpredictable nature of human naming habits.

**Ethical Considerations**

In the pursuit of statistical enlightenment, we upheld the highest ethical standards, ensuring the privacy and confidentiality of the data under our scrutiny. Our research team operated with the moral compass of a conscientious statistician, committed to upholding the principles of data integrity and respect for individual privacy.

With our data collection, statistical acrobatics, and ethical compass firmly in place, we set forth on a scholarly odyssey into the realm of quirky first names and their statistical shenanigans. What we discovered may just leave you "Reid"-ing for more!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reid and Total number of live births in Australia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1975 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9552605, r-squared of 0.9125226, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Reid-iculous Popularity: A Statistical Analysis of the Name Reid and Its Influence on Total Births Down Under

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the whimsical world of first names and their inexplicable influence on birth trends. While most research delves into serious matters, we decided to crack open the vault of curiosity and tackle the age-old question: does the popularity of the name Reid affect the total number of live births in Australia? Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning from 1975 to 2022. The findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9552605, eliciting a collective "woah" from our research team. With p < 0.01, we can confidently say that the popularity of the name Reid is more than just a coincidence - it's un-be-"Reid"-able. So, if you're considering naming your child Reid, rest assured that you may inadvertently contribute to a statistical spike in live births.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between first names and birth trends has long been a source of bewilderment and amusement. While the study of naming conventions may not seem like the most serious academic pursuit, it opens a window into the quirky and unpredictable nature of human behavior. In this paper, we delve into the enigmatic realm of nomenclature to explore the impact of the name Reid on the total number of live births in the land Down Under.
As researchers, we are accustomed to tackling weighty matters, but occasionally, we decide to indulge in some lighthearted statistical tomfoolery. After all, the world of data analysis could use a sprinkle of whimsy every now and then.
The name Reid, with its Scottish origins meaning "red-haired," has garnered a following for its distinctive charm and undeniable appeal. It is a name that encapsulates both strength and charisma, a bit like a superhero name, but without the spandex and cape.
Amidst the sea of names, Reid has managed to carve out its own niche, inviting us to ponder the peculiar influence it may have on the ebb and flow of birth rates. With its consonant-packed brevity, this moniker allures us into the statistical labyrinth, where we embark on an odyssey to unravel the mysterious connection between a name and the arrival of new bundles of joy.
Pondering the potential sway of a name on birth statistics prompts both head-scratching and delight. It's a bit like a statistical magic show – we're not sure how it works, but we eagerly anticipate being amazed.
In this paper, we endeavor to shed light on the Reid-iculous enigma, unearthing insights that may tickle the fancy of both data aficionados and those with a penchant for the absurd. Prepare to embark on a statistical adventure that may just leave you "Reid-y" to reconsider the impact of a name on the world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between the popularity of the name Reid and the total number of live births in Australia yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9552605, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship. This finding left our research team both astounded and bemused; it seems that the name Reid possesses a certain "je ne sais quoi" that exerts a gravitational pull on the birth rates in the land Down Under.

With an r-squared value of 0.9125226, we can affirm with confidence that the popularity of the name Reid explains over 91% of the variability in total live births in Australia. It's as if each occurrence of the name Reid sets off a delightful chain reaction, resulting in an influx of newborns. Who would've thought that a simple four-letter name could hold such sway over the birth trends?

The significance level (p < 0.01) further solidifies our findings, indicating that the correlation observed is not merely a fluke. We can confidently say that the popularity of the name Reid is more than a statistical quirk – it's a bona fide phenomenon. It appears that the name Reid wields an inexplicable influence, akin to a statistical sorcerer conjuring up an abundance of newborns with each utterance of its mellifluous syllables.

For a visual representation of the pronounced relationship between the popularity of the name Reid and total live births, refer to Figure 1, where the scatterplot illustrates the striking correlation. The data points form a nearly perfect linear pattern, affirming the undeniable allure of the name Reid in the realm of birth statistics.

In conclusion, our research unearths a whimsical yet robust connection between the name Reid and the total number of live births in Australia. This revelation transcends mere statistical analysis, prompting us to marvel at the curious influence of a name on the arrival of new generations. It seems that when it comes to birth trends, the name Reid is more than just a name – it's a statistical force to be reckoned with.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reid and Total number of live births in Australia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Reid-iculous Popularity: A Statistical Analysis of the Name Reid and Its Influence on Total Births Down Under

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the whimsical world of first names and their inexplicable influence on birth trends. While most research delves into serious matters, we decided to crack open the vault of curiosity and tackle the age-old question: does the popularity of the name Reid affect the total number of live births in Australia? Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning from 1975 to 2022. The findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9552605, eliciting a collective "woah" from our research team. With p < 0.01, we can confidently say that the popularity of the name Reid is more than just a coincidence - it's un-be-"Reid"-able. So, if you're considering naming your child Reid, rest assured that you may inadvertently contribute to a statistical spike in live births.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the influence of first names on birth trends has been a topic of fascination and intrigue among researchers and enthusiasts alike. Smith and Doe (2010) conducted a comprehensive study on the relationship between first names and demographic shifts, providing a solid foundation for subsequent investigations in this peculiar field. Similarly, Jones et al. (2015) delved into the cultural significance of names and their potential impact on societal phenomena.
However, as we venture further into the realm of name-related statistical analysis, we find ourselves in need of a lighthearted detour. Let's journey through a variety of sources that will illuminate the whimsical and often "Reid"-iculous nature of our current pursuit.
In "The Name Book: Over 10,000 Names, Their Meanings, Origins, and Spiritual Significance" by Dorothy Astoria, we find a treasure trove of name-related insights, albeit without specific mention of the name Reid. Nevertheless, the book serves as a reminder of the vast and intricate tapestry of names that shape human experiences and one's life trajectory.
On the fictional side, "Reid's Runaway Bride" by Lila Mathews and "The Enigma of Reid" by Cassandra Blair may not offer direct statistical insights, but their titles certainly evoke a sense of intrigue and enigma surrounding the name Reid. These books may not contribute to empirical research, but they remind us of the name's romantic and mysterious connotations.
In the age of social media, it's essential to consider the musings and observations of the public. A Reddit thread titled "The Reid Effect: Myth or Statistical Reality?" garnered spirited discussions on the potential correlation between the name Reid and birth rates. While not a scholarly source, the thread provides a glimpse into the public's curiosity about the influence of names on demographic phenomena.
As we navigate through this whimsical exploration, it becomes evident that the intersection of names and birth trends offers a playful yet thought-provoking avenue for inquiry. Let us embrace the joy of statistical tomfoolery and emerge enlightened, if not slightly amused, by the curious connection between a name and the birth of new life.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between the popularity of the name Reid and the total number of live births in Australia yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9552605, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship. This finding left our research team both astounded and bemused; it seems that the name Reid possesses a certain "je ne sais quoi" that exerts a gravitational pull on the birth rates in the land Down Under.
With an r-squared value of 0.9125226, we can affirm with confidence that the popularity of the name Reid explains over 91% of the variability in total live births in Australia. It's as if each occurrence of the name Reid sets off a delightful chain reaction, resulting in an influx of newborns. Who would've thought that a simple four-letter name could hold such sway over the birth trends?
The significance level (p < 0.01) further solidifies our findings, indicating that the correlation observed is not merely a fluke. We can confidently say that the popularity of the name Reid is more than a statistical quirk – it's a bona fide phenomenon. It appears that the name Reid wields an inexplicable influence, akin to a statistical sorcerer conjuring up an abundance of newborns with each utterance of its mellifluous syllables.
For a visual representation of the pronounced relationship between the popularity of the name Reid and total live births, refer to Figure 1, where the scatterplot illustrates the striking correlation. The data points form a nearly perfect linear pattern, affirming the undeniable allure of the name Reid in the realm of birth statistics.
In conclusion, our research unearths a whimsical yet robust connection between the name Reid and the total number of live births in Australia. This revelation transcends mere statistical analysis, prompting us to marvel at the curious influence of a name on the arrival of new generations. It seems that when it comes to birth trends, the name Reid is more than just a name – it's a statistical force to be reckoned with.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study present an intriguing revelation that aligns with prior research, albeit with an unexpected twist that may raise eyebrows and elicit a chuckle or two. As we revisit the whimsical elements of the literature review, we're reminded of the delightful detours we took during our journey through the realm of name-related statistical analysis.

Smith and Doe (2010) sowed the seeds of curiosity with their study on the influence of first names on demographic shifts. Little did they know that our foray into the impact of the name Reid would yield results that are not just statistically significant, but also delightfully surprising. It seems that the "Reid effect" discovered on Reddit may not be an exercise in myth-making, as our rigorous analysis has unraveled a statistical reality that piques the interest of statistical and whimsical minds alike.

While Dorothy Astoria's "The Name Book" may not have offered specific insights into the name Reid, its expansive archive of name meanings and origins serves as a reminder of the vast tapestry of human nomenclature. In a "Reid-letter day" twist, it appears our statistical endeavor has woven the name Reid into the intricate fabric of birth trends, adding to the colorful mosaic of names that shape human experiences.

Although Lila Mathews and Cassandra Blair's fictional works may not have directly contributed to empirical research, the enigmatic allure of the name Reid in their titles foreshadowed the surprising statistical enigma we've uncovered. It's as if our findings validate the romantic and mysterious connotations associated with the name, turning the whimsical speculation of fiction into a statistical spectacle.

While our results may seem whimsical, they stand as a testament to the unanticipated statistical pull wielded by the name Reid. The robust correlation coefficient and the formidable r-squared value affirm the substantial influence of this four-letter name on birth trends. It appears that the statistical sorcery attributed to the name Reid in the Reddit thread has been inadvertently validated by our findings.

In light of the significance level (p < 0.01), we must acknowledge the undeniable influence of the name Reid on the birth trends in Australia. This statistical "Reid-naissance" leads us to the inescapable conclusion that the name Reid is more than just a name – it's a statistical force to be reckoned with.

In essence, our findings add a whimsical yet significant chapter to the delightful intersection of statistical analysis and the realm of names. The name Reid, it seems, holds a statistical sway that transcends conventional expectations. As we ponder the inexplicable influence of this name on birth trends, perhaps we can't help but marvel at the statistical quirkiness that underpins our findings. Indeed, the statistical landscape has been enlivened by the unexpected charm of the name Reid – a testament to the joyful surprises that statistical inquiry can unveil.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reid and Total number of live births in Australia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Reid-iculous Popularity: A Statistical Analysis of the Name Reid and Its Influence on Total Births Down Under

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the whimsical world of first names and their inexplicable influence on birth trends. While most research delves into serious matters, we decided to crack open the vault of curiosity and tackle the age-old question: does the popularity of the name Reid affect the total number of live births in Australia? Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning from 1975 to 2022. The findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9552605, eliciting a collective "woah" from our research team. With p < 0.01, we can confidently say that the popularity of the name Reid is more than just a coincidence - it's un-be-"Reid"-able. So, if you're considering naming your child Reid, rest assured that you may inadvertently contribute to a statistical spike in live births.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between first names and birth trends has long been a source of bewilderment and amusement. While the study of naming conventions may not seem like the most serious academic pursuit, it opens a window into the quirky and unpredictable nature of human behavior. In this paper, we delve into the enigmatic realm of nomenclature to explore the impact of the name Reid on the total number of live births in the land Down Under.
As researchers, we are accustomed to tackling weighty matters, but occasionally, we decide to indulge in some lighthearted statistical tomfoolery. After all, the world of data analysis could use a sprinkle of whimsy every now and then.
The name Reid, with its Scottish origins meaning "red-haired," has garnered a following for its distinctive charm and undeniable appeal. It is a name that encapsulates both strength and charisma, a bit like a superhero name, but without the spandex and cape.
Amidst the sea of names, Reid has managed to carve out its own niche, inviting us to ponder the peculiar influence it may have on the ebb and flow of birth rates. With its consonant-packed brevity, this moniker allures us into the statistical labyrinth, where we embark on an odyssey to unravel the mysterious connection between a name and the arrival of new bundles of joy.
Pondering the potential sway of a name on birth statistics prompts both head-scratching and delight. It's a bit like a statistical magic show – we're not sure how it works, but we eagerly anticipate being amazed.
In this paper, we endeavor to shed light on the Reid-iculous enigma, unearthing insights that may tickle the fancy of both data aficionados and those with a penchant for the absurd. Prepare to embark on a statistical adventure that may just leave you "Reid-y" to reconsider the impact of a name on the world.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between the popularity of the name Reid and the total number of live births in Australia yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9552605, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship. This finding left our research team both astounded and bemused; it seems that the name Reid possesses a certain "je ne sais quoi" that exerts a gravitational pull on the birth rates in the land Down Under.
With an r-squared value of 0.9125226, we can affirm with confidence that the popularity of the name Reid explains over 91% of the variability in total live births in Australia. It's as if each occurrence of the name Reid sets off a delightful chain reaction, resulting in an influx of newborns. Who would've thought that a simple four-letter name could hold such sway over the birth trends?
The significance level (p < 0.01) further solidifies our findings, indicating that the correlation observed is not merely a fluke. We can confidently say that the popularity of the name Reid is more than a statistical quirk – it's a bona fide phenomenon. It appears that the name Reid wields an inexplicable influence, akin to a statistical sorcerer conjuring up an abundance of newborns with each utterance of its mellifluous syllables.
For a visual representation of the pronounced relationship between the popularity of the name Reid and total live births, refer to Figure 1, where the scatterplot illustrates the striking correlation. The data points form a nearly perfect linear pattern, affirming the undeniable allure of the name Reid in the realm of birth statistics.
In conclusion, our research unearths a whimsical yet robust connection between the name Reid and the total number of live births in Australia. This revelation transcends mere statistical analysis, prompting us to marvel at the curious influence of a name on the arrival of new generations. It seems that when it comes to birth trends, the name Reid is more than just a name – it's a statistical force to be reckoned with.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the whimsical world of statistical analysis, our findings have unveiled a Reid-iculously strong correlation between the popularity of the name Reid and the total number of live births in Australia. It seems that this name holds more sway over birth trends than a kangaroo holds over a game of hopscotch!

With a correlation coefficient that could make even the most stoic researcher raise an eyebrow, our study indicates that the name Reid isn't just a name – it's a statistical powerhouse, a veritable dynamo of nomenclature that seems to coax newborns into the world like a pied piper in a nursery rhyme.

The strong r-squared value of 0.9125226 is a testament to the seemingly magnetic charm of the name Reid, explaining over 91% of the variability in total live births. It's as if this name has a gravitational pull stronger than the pull of a barbie on Australia Day!

The significance level (p < 0.01) further solidifies our findings, proving that the correlation observed is no statistical fluke. It's clear that the name Reid has an undeniable influence, much like the allure of a shrimp on the barbie.

In conclusion, it's safe to say that the popularity of the name Reid is more than just a curiosity; it's a statistical phenomenon that raises more questions than a didgeridoo raises eyebrows at a Guinness World Record attempt. It seems that when it comes to birth trends, the name Reid isn't just a name – it's a statistical force to be reckoned with.

With these un-be-"Reid"-able findings, we assert that further research in this oddly delightful area is simply not needed—our conclusion is as solid as a kangaroo's pouch!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Reid-iculous Popularity: A Statistical Analysis of the Name Reid and Its Influence on Total Births Down Under. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Comical Sociological Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Reid-iculous Popularity: A Statistical Analysis of the Name Reid and Its Influence on Total Births Down Under. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Whimsical Name Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Reid-iculous Popularity: A Statistical Analysis of the Name Reid and Its Influence on Total Births Down Under with an abstract of This paper explores the whimsical world of first names and their inexplicable influence on birth trends. While most research delves into serious matters, we decided to crack open the vault of curiosity and tackle the age-old question: does the popularity of the name Reid affect the total number of live births in Australia? Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia, we conducted a rigorous statistical analysis spanning from 1975 to 2022. The findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9552605, eliciting a collective "woah" from our research team. With p < 0.01, we can confidently say that the popularity of the name Reid is more than just a coincidence - it's un-be-"Reid"-able. So, if you're considering naming your child Reid, rest assured that you may inadvertently contribute to a statistical spike in live births.

ChatGPT:

Reid, statistical analysis, birth trends, first names, Australia, US Social Security Administration data, Wikipedia data, correlation coefficient, live births, name popularity, naming children

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Reid
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Reid
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Reid

Total number of live births in Australia
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Total number of live births in Australia

Correlation r = 0.9552605 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9125226 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 91.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total number of live births in Australia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Reid) over the 48 years from 1975 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.6E-26. 0.0000000000000000000000000563
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 5.6E-24% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 17,761,989,342,806,393,915,179,008 random variables You don't actually need 17 septillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 47 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 47 because we have two variables measured over a period of 48 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.92, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197519761977197819791980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Reid (Babies born)1651511361921852122432592902883042963343353133393674954635646435405105685355605655675706146477087008879271175114112371409146413731431128812631208108911401074
Total number of live births in Australia (Live births per year)239794231135226954225359223370223664230920237076241764240544241814239115242977246200250155257521261158259186259959258314258210250438253660249105249965249310247500250988246663249082255934263540274330302300295700297900301617309582308065299697305377311104309142315147305832294369309996300700




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([165,151,136,192,185,212,243,259,290,288,304,296,334,335,313,339,367,495,463,564,643,540,510,568,535,560,565,567,570,614,647,708,700,887,927,1175,1141,1237,1409,1464,1373,1431,1288,1263,1208,1089,1140,1074,])
array_2 = np.array([239794,231135,226954,225359,223370,223664,230920,237076,241764,240544,241814,239115,242977,246200,250155,257521,261158,259186,259959,258314,258210,250438,253660,249105,249965,249310,247500,250988,246663,249082,255934,263540,274330,302300,295700,297900,301617,309582,308065,299697,305377,311104,309142,315147,305832,294369,309996,300700,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Reid"
array_2_name = "Total number of live births in Australia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 1177 · Black Variable ID: 2847 · Red Variable ID: 51
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0